Join the OBAMA CLUB over 30 million Members Strong. They call themselves the unemployed. We don't discriminate. All races are represented.Maybe you will be the next one to join!
It would have been so much greener if every one in the party drove up in their own Prius. I thought they did good, as I'm used to seeing SUVs, on dry pavement, with a max load of 1 driver.
hypocrisy by some does not negate the fact that man made climate change isn't a reality... Just like war profiteers is not proof that ww2 didn't need to be fought by America.
@emrei98 - Yeah, because its not like we will ever run out of fossil fuels or have to fight long protracted resource wars to keep up with our need for petrol.
@killerbandit : That is quite a non sequitur. You make an argument about hypocrisy not impacting the truthfullness of Global Warming and follow it up with being concerned with running out of fossil fuels. Despite what your brain may be telling you, these aren't the same topics.
@emrei98 - hate to break this to you but the two are directly related. If you don't think the fossil fuel industry is in large part responsible for the denial of the existence of global climate change, then I am not the least bit surprised that you don't think there is a problem with pumping millions of years worth of stored carbon into our atmosphere over the course of a few hundred years.
@killerbandit : Your 1st argument was about whether or not GW exists. The 2nd point you made was that we need to shouldn't be burning fossil fuels because we will run out and wars are being fought over them. If you’re worried about fossil fuels causing GW, then you really shouldn’t be concerned about running out of them. Please try to make logical connections between your arguments and not just throw every leftist meme that you can think of at the wall to see what sticks.
@emrei98 Climate change exists, and if we can agree on that we might stop using fossil fuels before we run out of them. Lets assume for a moment that we do agree on this premise, can you understand who might take issue with this. You can't see the connection of these two issues? I know you righties like to compartmentalize everything but this isn't how reality works.
The two issues are intertwined and you can't solve one without considering the other.
@killerbandit First of all there is no scientific evidence to support the anthropogenic global warming theory. Google the Petition Project for a list of 32,000 scientists who disagree with you. Second point is why do you think we are running out of carbon based fuels? Ever heard of the Russian/Ukrainian Oil theory? Even if it is not true we still have about a 1,000 year supply in the US. Ever heard of methane clathrates? Nuclear fuel will last for hundreds of thousands and is safe and clean.
@ShamgarOxgoad700 - No scientific evidence of Climate Change? I can't help you there if you insist on not looking.
Carbon based fuels aside from being toxic upon usage, are toxic when removed. Ever heard of fractal drilling for natural gas? The US already has water supply issues and you want to use more to drill and risk your existing water tables?
Nuclear fuel will last for hundreds of thousands of years? Really, considering our supply is limited and it is incredibly toxic and risky, no thx.
@killerbandit I did not say Climate Change. Everyone knows there is climate change. The climate changes every day. Even a third grader would know that.
@ShamgarOxgoad700 - ummm... thanks for displaying your lack of knowledge on this issue. Weather is not the same as climate. Global warming is a misnomer because altering the chemical balance of our atmosphere will not cause 'warming' everywhere and what it really does is amplify the changes in local weather.
@killerbandit a lot of climate-global-warming-cooling-change rhetoric, killer, but not one comment on you about one of your liberal heroes pulling up to a green jobs rally in a FLEET of SUVs. Should piss you off royally. But I doubt it does. You see, liberals are the champs of hypocrisy. Do as the limousine liberal SAYS, not what they DO. I bet you love Babs Streisand, too.
@Attitude88North - I know you think that Harry Reid is a liberal idol, but he isn't. He sold us out during the health care debates and showed his true colors. As is the case with most politicians, he is a corporatist. Sorry to break it to you.
@killerbandit Humans produce less then 6% of atmospheric CO2. Volcanism and even termites produce more. Also CO2 is the weakest of all greenhouse gasses. We simply do not produce enough to make any difference. Sure the climate is changing, please list any time in Earth's history that it hasn't. AGW is a hoax; A lie being used by the watermelons to destroy capitalist economies. It is nothing more then a money and power grab. Wake up dude!
Just like Al Gore driving an SUV and using tons of electricity in his Tennessee home. They don't really care about the environment. They only care about making money off of their carbon market and green tech investments.
you retards realize that's an armored suv right? lool - he's the leader of the senate, did you expect him to roll around in an unarmored prius?
.
lmao! God republicans are dumb
politburo 11 months ago
when Harry speaks into the device it should be called a bullsh*t horn
hihats 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Join the OBAMA CLUB over 30 million Members Strong. They call themselves the unemployed. We don't discriminate. All races are represented.Maybe you will be the next one to join!
mueygringo 1 year ago
Ironic.
Micheleeroo 1 year ago
Reid... one lying fucking idiot
Nincumpoopie 1 year ago 2
What a jackass.
Attitude88North 1 year ago
Its time to overthrow this illegal obama regime, and remove all the communists from congress. Obama must be tried for treason and punished.
Harry , Nancy, Cris, Waxman and the rest of the commies should be dealt with as a a taliban spy would be.
JAQUEOBAUER 1 year ago 2
Too funny.
JasonRP12NH 1 year ago
It would have been so much greener if every one in the party drove up in their own Prius. I thought they did good, as I'm used to seeing SUVs, on dry pavement, with a max load of 1 driver.
ralewi1 1 year ago 2
So how are the Dumbocrats going to explain this?
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
Dingy Harry at his democRat best!
SharpShootist 1 year ago
fucking democrats
Krupification 1 year ago
hypocrisy by some does not negate the fact that man made climate change isn't a reality... Just like war profiteers is not proof that ww2 didn't need to be fought by America.
killerbandit 1 year ago
@killerbandit : I'll believe that Global Warming is a problem when it's biggest promoters start acting like it's a problem.
emrei98 1 year ago
@emrei98 - Yeah, because its not like we will ever run out of fossil fuels or have to fight long protracted resource wars to keep up with our need for petrol.
killerbandit 1 year ago
@killerbandit : That is quite a non sequitur. You make an argument about hypocrisy not impacting the truthfullness of Global Warming and follow it up with being concerned with running out of fossil fuels. Despite what your brain may be telling you, these aren't the same topics.
emrei98 1 year ago
@emrei98 - hate to break this to you but the two are directly related. If you don't think the fossil fuel industry is in large part responsible for the denial of the existence of global climate change, then I am not the least bit surprised that you don't think there is a problem with pumping millions of years worth of stored carbon into our atmosphere over the course of a few hundred years.
killerbandit 1 year ago
@killerbandit : Your 1st argument was about whether or not GW exists. The 2nd point you made was that we need to shouldn't be burning fossil fuels because we will run out and wars are being fought over them. If you’re worried about fossil fuels causing GW, then you really shouldn’t be concerned about running out of them. Please try to make logical connections between your arguments and not just throw every leftist meme that you can think of at the wall to see what sticks.
emrei98 1 year ago
@emrei98 Climate change exists, and if we can agree on that we might stop using fossil fuels before we run out of them. Lets assume for a moment that we do agree on this premise, can you understand who might take issue with this. You can't see the connection of these two issues? I know you righties like to compartmentalize everything but this isn't how reality works.
The two issues are intertwined and you can't solve one without considering the other.
killerbandit 1 year ago
@killerbandit First of all there is no scientific evidence to support the anthropogenic global warming theory. Google the Petition Project for a list of 32,000 scientists who disagree with you. Second point is why do you think we are running out of carbon based fuels? Ever heard of the Russian/Ukrainian Oil theory? Even if it is not true we still have about a 1,000 year supply in the US. Ever heard of methane clathrates? Nuclear fuel will last for hundreds of thousands and is safe and clean.
ShamgarOxgoad700 1 year ago
@ShamgarOxgoad700 - No scientific evidence of Climate Change? I can't help you there if you insist on not looking.
Carbon based fuels aside from being toxic upon usage, are toxic when removed. Ever heard of fractal drilling for natural gas? The US already has water supply issues and you want to use more to drill and risk your existing water tables?
Nuclear fuel will last for hundreds of thousands of years? Really, considering our supply is limited and it is incredibly toxic and risky, no thx.
killerbandit 1 year ago
@killerbandit I did not say Climate Change. Everyone knows there is climate change. The climate changes every day. Even a third grader would know that.
ShamgarOxgoad700 1 year ago
@ShamgarOxgoad700 - ummm... thanks for displaying your lack of knowledge on this issue. Weather is not the same as climate. Global warming is a misnomer because altering the chemical balance of our atmosphere will not cause 'warming' everywhere and what it really does is amplify the changes in local weather.
killerbandit 1 year ago
@killerbandit a lot of climate-global-warming-cooling-change rhetoric, killer, but not one comment on you about one of your liberal heroes pulling up to a green jobs rally in a FLEET of SUVs. Should piss you off royally. But I doubt it does. You see, liberals are the champs of hypocrisy. Do as the limousine liberal SAYS, not what they DO. I bet you love Babs Streisand, too.
Shameful
Attitude88North 1 year ago
@Attitude88North - I know you think that Harry Reid is a liberal idol, but he isn't. He sold us out during the health care debates and showed his true colors. As is the case with most politicians, he is a corporatist. Sorry to break it to you.
killerbandit 1 year ago
@killerbandit Humans produce less then 6% of atmospheric CO2. Volcanism and even termites produce more. Also CO2 is the weakest of all greenhouse gasses. We simply do not produce enough to make any difference. Sure the climate is changing, please list any time in Earth's history that it hasn't. AGW is a hoax; A lie being used by the watermelons to destroy capitalist economies. It is nothing more then a money and power grab. Wake up dude!
blindavocado 1 year ago 3
@blindavocado Well said.
Attitude88North 1 year ago
Just like Al Gore driving an SUV and using tons of electricity in his Tennessee home. They don't really care about the environment. They only care about making money off of their carbon market and green tech investments.
xtreme1002003 1 year ago 3
it's not an environment they want to change...
it's a society. to breed a New Man and get rid of undesirables... always the same.
grraadd 1 year ago 2