Not 100% sure, but it looks like the SRT here did about a 14.3, and the Magnum did about a 14.74.
Thos are slow times for both of them, if bone stock. The SRT should be about mid 13's, completely stock, I've seen many run that. The Magnum R/T should be mid to low 14's. I have an R/T. It was doing 14.5 before any mods. So, about the SRT costing more, you will almost ALWAYS get 1 full second faster with the SRT. Again, talking stock.
@7car7 Most people forget to figure in elevation and that not everyone is at sea level, these guys could be running at like 4000-5000ft, and if thats the case then they would run a full second slower than at sea level, and then that would put them at about what stock times should be of slightly quicker.
Ya, I hear ya, that may be. I guess my comment was really more so about these 2 cars times not being that much different from each other. Even at high altitude, I'd think there should still be about 1 second difference. We're talking .44 here, that's too close - to "dcxsucks", that .44 for stock cars is NOT typical.
not 100, about 70 more. RTs are pretty underrated from the factory, as are the SRTs, but not as much as RTs. But still, it is quite a bit faster. you'll get an extra second bone stock.
wow, the SRT8, cost a lot more and has about 100 more HP but isn't that much faster.
dcxsucks 3 years ago
Not 100% sure, but it looks like the SRT here did about a 14.3, and the Magnum did about a 14.74.
Thos are slow times for both of them, if bone stock. The SRT should be about mid 13's, completely stock, I've seen many run that. The Magnum R/T should be mid to low 14's. I have an R/T. It was doing 14.5 before any mods. So, about the SRT costing more, you will almost ALWAYS get 1 full second faster with the SRT. Again, talking stock.
7car7 3 years ago
@7car7 Most people forget to figure in elevation and that not everyone is at sea level, these guys could be running at like 4000-5000ft, and if thats the case then they would run a full second slower than at sea level, and then that would put them at about what stock times should be of slightly quicker.
circlelt1 11 months ago
@circlelt1
Ya, I hear ya, that may be. I guess my comment was really more so about these 2 cars times not being that much different from each other. Even at high altitude, I'd think there should still be about 1 second difference. We're talking .44 here, that's too close - to "dcxsucks", that .44 for stock cars is NOT typical.
7car7 11 months ago
@dcxsucks
not 100, about 70 more. RTs are pretty underrated from the factory, as are the SRTs, but not as much as RTs. But still, it is quite a bit faster. you'll get an extra second bone stock.
JIMMYJIBLETS 1 year ago
@JIMMYJIBLETS
Exactly.
7car7 11 months ago