Added: 4 years ago
From: elohimyahuh
Views: 9,969
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (46)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • SHES HAWT! :)

  • wtf?

  • Damn, every comment here was a year ago...it really must have died around here.

  • i have a nvida geforce fx 5200 and its decent for gaming

  • not anymore :)

  • well a little below decent :(

  • Decent would probably be my 6100. xD

  • ya my nvidia blows XDDD

  • I had a 5200 before this, the 5200 was HORRIBLE. xD

  • well u can play games like wow, guild wars, counter strike source, halo, team fortress 2, and stuff like that. so its good for me haha

  • Though, Nvidia lied about it being good for Doom 3. Even on low, Doom 3 used to lag on me. 6100 has much better performance.

  • i hope it does coes im getting one =)

  • I was lucky and found a computer lying around in my house. It came with a better processor and a built in 6100. I plan to get something along the lines of a GeForce 8800. That should be able to run any game. The 6100 can run pretty much anything, including Crysis, but it lags horribly even on lowest.

  • how much are 88's?

  • I found one for $110, I can't get it for awhile.

  • not to cheap not too expensive i guess

    k i came up with something and tell me if this is a good point

    if u got a nvidia geforce 9900, would u ever have to upgrade your card again? it plays crysis without a problem, and crysis looks real so how can u go further than real right?

  • Obviously, graphics can always improve. More dynamic lights, more interaction in the environment (Though I imagine that would affect the CPU more), even higher res (It could perhaps go as high as atomic detail), more effects going on the screen at once, better shaders, etc.

  • by how much do u think. couldnt be alot

  • Well, not visibly. There are graphical ways it can improve below the surface. More reflective surfaces to make the skin reflect exactly where it would in real life, and when the player is dripping wet, a realistic looking particle system for water so it'll be realistically carried around, mud being dug through by walking on it, etc.

  • but really whos gonna take the time to do that

  • Someone going for 100% realism?

  • well id tell them good luck with that

  • Besides, even older games have more level of detail than Crysis in some ways. Half-Life 2 has massive item interaction which Crysis, in a way, doesn't and, on Red Faction, you can carve through walls, floors, and ceilings with explosives something you can't do on Crysis. They can always get more graphically realistic.

  • I dont give a crap about the video quality, that fairy has a nice ass and tits, is it legal to have sex with fairies i ponder, hope not, the wings would get in the way of course, but i recon i'd think of a way around that problem, why are fairies so sexy i wonder, could it be coz nvidia want to sell us more nvidia 5200 graphics cards, buy making us think with our dicks, suppose its the shortest way to a guys wallet,geewiz NVIDIA MUST ARE SMART GUYS AT MAKIN MONEY!!!!

  • She looks good on my EVGA 8800 Ultra KO!! Over 100 fps+ She looks very real at 1600x1200.

  • good for you

  • yes, thank you, she also looked great on my BFG 6800 GS OC AGP 8X.

  • I'd hit that.... j/j j/k

  • how do you take these tests

  • mines rally good i agree with mack069

  • things thing runs at like 60 fps on my 8800 ^_^

  • I have a geforce 6200, p4 2.80, 512mb RAM and this demo runs like crap, literaly 3 fps all the way through. Any help solving this would be appreciated :)

  • newer cards like the 6200 dont have very many vertex shaders, and this demo only uses vertex shaders.

  • its because this demo was designed for the fx 5 series, now the GeForce 6 series.....nvidia made a demo optimized for each new generation of cards that came out....trust me, the Nvidia 5200 is a shitty card, I have it, and it sucks! I can't run any new games on it, even at the lowest settings!

  • You sure it ain't your PC?

    I Have a 3ghz, 512 ram, FX5200 and i can play Ragnarok 2 and Half Life 2 on High Quality.

    It is a good graphics card, but you can't expect it to run Bioshock without a higher end pc.

  • hmm maybe I have a crappier version or something, I have an AMD dual core 2.0 ghz, 2 gb of ram, and an fx5200 and I couldn't even run HL2 on the lowest quality!

  • You guys complain about not being able to run any games. The 5200 / 6200 cards were never meant to play any games! They're low end cards, for office aplications!

  • LOL.. atleast I managed to complete STALKER of chernobyl with fx5200 (well with trainer...cuz the game lag heavily with many people around). back then I have a P4 2.6Ghz, 2GB DDR ram.

  • well i run far cry on max on a 6200 ( no aa, 1024/768 everyting else very high)

  • I don't think my pc can do that, even though I have the fastest (factory clock) Pentium III they made. This exact demo has a very low framerate because my cpu can't handle it

  • Awesome!

    Dawn demo run a little bit slow on my GeForce FX 5200 128MB /64 bits (ForceWare 77.72)...

    Config.: A7N8X-X, AMD Athlon XP 2600+, 1 GB RAM @ 333MHz, HD 80 GB.

  • whats your games

  • NFSU II

    Virtua Tennis

    Sonic Adventures II

    CoD 2

    (...)

  • i have virtua tennis 3

    NFSC

    NFSMW

    flatout 2

    silent hunter 4

    pro evolution soccer 2008

    tony hawk's pro skater 4 and 3

    tony hawk's underground 2 and 1

    (...)

    my card is a radeon x1650 pro 512 ram

  • wow awesome

  • wow crap

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more