By the way I was being sarcastic of course there are no references because the dinosaurs died out at least 65 million years before the human race evolved.
How come there are no references to dinosaurs in ancient art? Aka the ancient egyptians? The ancient civilizations recorded all aspects of their lives so dinosaurs would have featured right net to the oxen, sheep, baboons camels the list goes on. I guess these civilizations came after the flood?
@SLMF: Is that the depth and breath of your argument? If so, it's irrelevant. It's not the amount of time that is required for fossilization, nor for oil to form. It's the geologic context in which these elements are found. Perhaps at one time you might have been able to say it's circular thinking. However, modern radioisotope dating methods disprove that with great accuracy. And dendrochronolgy alone shows an earth aged in excess of the genesis account.
I'm a Christian, (and currently a young earth creationist), but i guess the guy was a bit nervous (considering might be consider quite a intellectually/socially confrontational situation) and so i guess why He made that point of what he believed very quickly and didn't think of saying any younger.
and thier beliefs (as shown here) rather than present their own "facts" for subject for debate. ck out Maluina Lak of the Univeristy of Rennes in France study of Translucent Amber pics of insects "100 million yrs old"
but there is no change in the insects found there. futher more if an insect cant change in 100 million years how long does it take. thats a hell of alot of environmental change
Some Christians attack people who believe in evolution too. Both of us (Christians and non Christians) do it. I believe in evolution, but i wouldn't verbally attack anyone who disagrees with my point of view.
environment was completly differant In The Beginning which there was more water in our atmosphere "the firmament above" when taken
in context of todays current techniques of dating would explain why so little radaition in fossils using radiometric dating. So the Earth is younger than she appears. Trust the One who was there. The Alpha and Omega.
The bible does cover a lot of history.....including parts that COULD be interpreted as "super string theory" quantum physics (pseudotruth) however...if you "literally" interpret the bible....it says that a day to God is like a 1000 years...hmmm...4500 years times 365 days times a 1000 years....well seems like the fossils are, according to God's literal word, much older than 4500 years! More like 164,250,000!
According to Genesis God means a day to be a "DAY" not 1000 years other wise God would not have said for example Gen 1:13 and the evening and the morning were the third day. Verse 14 let there be lights in the firmament of heaven to divide the day from the night and let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years.
Indeed, and the Bible recognises such geological events.
But the matter still remains that the Bible doesn't say the Earth is flat. Not unless one dissects verses from context, from a poetical context or a poorly translated text.
The bible doesn't say it's a sphere either. (unless freely translated with current knowledge, but not in most versions)
It does refer to events only possible on a flat earth such as trees AND mountains so high the whole world can see them (only possible on a flat earth)
Falling off the edge, same thing.
If you claim that's poetical context, then -in my view- you should see the bible as bad poetry.
The bible also supports an earth centric 'solar' system.
Creationists always claim that the Flood is responsible for land fossils, but why would the Flood be responsible for shark fossils? Those shold have been laid down at the same rate during the flood. Hell the sharks were having a great time, you know gobling up all those drowning land animals!
Joe, Have you really ever taken a critical look at the assumptions and problems with the molecules-to-man evolution model or investigated the claims of the alternative creation model of origins? Also, did you take and read any of the free information at the dinosaur booth while you shot your video? I will send a packet to anyone with an open mind for free. Just email me.
Well, you could start with almost any biology book. Or, where I started, read: "On the origin of species" by Charles Darwin. If you only read the Bible, you willonly get one answer -- ever.
By the way I was being sarcastic of course there are no references because the dinosaurs died out at least 65 million years before the human race evolved.
truthseeker7899 2 years ago
How come there are no references to dinosaurs in ancient art? Aka the ancient egyptians? The ancient civilizations recorded all aspects of their lives so dinosaurs would have featured right net to the oxen, sheep, baboons camels the list goes on. I guess these civilizations came after the flood?
truthseeker7899 2 years ago
It only takes 50 years or less to fossilise something, proven!
SevenLivesManyFaces 2 years ago
@SLMF: Is that the depth and breath of your argument? If so, it's irrelevant. It's not the amount of time that is required for fossilization, nor for oil to form. It's the geologic context in which these elements are found. Perhaps at one time you might have been able to say it's circular thinking. However, modern radioisotope dating methods disprove that with great accuracy. And dendrochronolgy alone shows an earth aged in excess of the genesis account.
magick205 2 years ago
That guy is literally selling ignorance.
tehsma 3 years ago
I'm a Christian, (and currently a young earth creationist), but i guess the guy was a bit nervous (considering might be consider quite a intellectually/socially confrontational situation) and so i guess why He made that point of what he believed very quickly and didn't think of saying any younger.
MatthewHudghton 3 years ago
I have debated many evolutionist and athist.
and what i have found that they attack people
and thier beliefs (as shown here) rather than present their own "facts" for subject for debate. ck out Maluina Lak of the Univeristy of Rennes in France study of Translucent Amber pics of insects "100 million yrs old"
but there is no change in the insects found there. futher more if an insect cant change in 100 million years how long does it take. thats a hell of alot of environmental change
lizaleon 3 years ago 2
Dear lizaleon,
There is no attack here; the video is the creationist just explaining his views.
luczkovichj 3 years ago
Some Christians attack people who believe in evolution too. Both of us (Christians and non Christians) do it. I believe in evolution, but i wouldn't verbally attack anyone who disagrees with my point of view.
grahamnachos 3 years ago
@lizaleon No change? How so? Have you consulted an entomologist on this or are you just making a broad comparison.
BravoSquirrel 1 year ago
The Bible clearly states In Genesis that the
environment was completly differant In The Beginning which there was more water in our atmosphere "the firmament above" when taken
in context of todays current techniques of dating would explain why so little radaition in fossils using radiometric dating. So the Earth is younger than she appears. Trust the One who was there. The Alpha and Omega.
lizaleon 3 years ago
There are no science lessons in any part of the Bible .Why would lifes origins be any diffrent .
flyingscience 4 years ago
The bible does cover a lot of history.....including parts that COULD be interpreted as "super string theory" quantum physics (pseudotruth) however...if you "literally" interpret the bible....it says that a day to God is like a 1000 years...hmmm...4500 years times 365 days times a 1000 years....well seems like the fossils are, according to God's literal word, much older than 4500 years! More like 164,250,000!
aikensatlas 4 years ago
According to Genesis God means a day to be a "DAY" not 1000 years other wise God would not have said for example Gen 1:13 and the evening and the morning were the third day. Verse 14 let there be lights in the firmament of heaven to divide the day from the night and let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years.
Bonigee 4 years ago
Since the bible has all the answers, why can't I find anything in it about quantum theory or even how my cellphone works?
It doesn't say much about string theory or black holes either.
But it does say lots about rape, child & gang-rape, abortion, murder, slavery, and other nasty things.
Seems god has his little hobbies.
But science isn't one of them!
pseudotruth 4 years ago 6
The Bible doesn't mention chemical compounds either.
Trees and mountains so high the whole world can see them? at once, everyone can see them all at one time?
Falling of the edge? Space has no up or down, falling is merely relative.
Bad poetry? perhaps
Earth centric 'solar' system?
All your claims must be backed up by verses. Otherwise you could say anything (e.g. The Bible says pigs can fly.)
Dihydrousoxide 4 years ago
So sad.
sp00n3d 4 years ago
hehe great video
Hez1337 4 years ago
Well that was certainly an opinion.
But 'evidence' or 'fact'?
Definitely not.
ziomikey 4 years ago
Evolution is a religion.
XsSword 4 years ago
Religion is about faith with no evidence. That, in no way, describes evolution, quite the opposite.
rkzenrage 4 years ago
"XsSword Evolution is a religion. "
Evidence for science not called religion.
Intranetusa 4 years ago
Hi intranetusa,
Nevermind XsSword, he takes the bible literally ;)
mindwis3 4 years ago
or the Koran...lol
Intranetusa 4 years ago
The bible is literal, so the Earth stands still and is flat? How fun!
rkzenrage 4 years ago
Where is that?...no argument just wondering.
XsSword 4 years ago
Where does it say that in the Bible?
Dihydrousoxide 4 years ago
1 Chronicles 16:30: "He has fixed the earth firm, immovable."
Psalm 93:1: "Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm ..."
Psalm 96:10: "He has fixed the earth firm, immovable ..."
Psalm 104:5: "Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation so that it never can be shaken."
Isaiah 45:18: "...who made the earth and fashioned it, and himself fixed it fast..."
rkzenrage 4 years ago
Immovable in the relative term to the point of view to the writer.
Dihydrousoxide 4 years ago
Post hoc rationalization.
zakiechan 4 years ago
Earthquakes, volcanoes, faults, and the mid-ocean ridges all seem to counter these claims of a "fixed Earth".
luczkovichj 4 years ago
Indeed, and the Bible recognises such geological events.
But the matter still remains that the Bible doesn't say the Earth is flat. Not unless one dissects verses from context, from a poetical context or a poorly translated text.
Dihydrousoxide 4 years ago
DiHydrousOxide:
The bible doesn't say it's a sphere either. (unless freely translated with current knowledge, but not in most versions)
It does refer to events only possible on a flat earth such as trees AND mountains so high the whole world can see them (only possible on a flat earth)
Falling off the edge, same thing.
If you claim that's poetical context, then -in my view- you should see the bible as bad poetry.
The bible also supports an earth centric 'solar' system.
mindwis3 4 years ago
Creationists always claim that the Flood is responsible for land fossils, but why would the Flood be responsible for shark fossils? Those shold have been laid down at the same rate during the flood. Hell the sharks were having a great time, you know gobling up all those drowning land animals!
KidDirty333 4 years ago
Joe, Have you really ever taken a critical look at the assumptions and problems with the molecules-to-man evolution model or investigated the claims of the alternative creation model of origins? Also, did you take and read any of the free information at the dinosaur booth while you shot your video? I will send a packet to anyone with an open mind for free. Just email me.
bdobler 4 years ago
Well, you could start with almost any biology book. Or, where I started, read: "On the origin of species" by Charles Darwin. If you only read the Bible, you willonly get one answer -- ever.
luczkovichj 4 years ago
I believe that no matter what I say you would renounce with some witty comment so...we'll just see when we die I guess...Agree.?
XsSword 4 years ago
This is my dad's friend. I respect him for standing on the Word of God. So, what's your evidence for evolution? :)
rachelcbryant 4 years ago
This is my dad's friend. I respect him for standing on the Word of God. So, what's your evidence for evolution? :)
rachelcbryant 4 years ago
Creationists like precision, it seems. There is no variation or error in their measurements. Thus, they must be always right! :)
luczkovichj 5 years ago
On the plus side, creationists are never out by more than 4.5 thousand years :)
spaceagebachelor 5 years ago