Consider this. There is no dark energy because the universe is not expanding, ie there is no big bang theory. Dark matter exists, and the Opera experiment not only confirms this but provides us with the index of refraction for dark matter in this area of the galaxy.
@DiogenesofCalgary Unfortunately for that thought, there's a great deal of experimental evidence suggesting that the universe is expanding. To have a cosmological theory that doesn't have an expanding universe, you'll need a way to explain that evidence in terms of something else that you can test.
@Nyphur Sorry I'm sort of new to this. I have pretty well all the proof that any person would want. I'm going to change the name of dark matter to Claire matter. If you want I can demonstrate it for you. Easy smeasy.
@DiogenesofCalgary I don't want to seem mean, but you can't overturn the big bang theory by posting youtube videos of an idea about refraction causing redshift, and you don't get to name stuff after yourself. To prove the idea is even plausible, you need to come up with a mathematical model of it and prove that it accurately predicts all current observations. If that's easy smeasy, then go right ahead. Hell, can you even prove that refraction can cause an effect like redshift?
@Nyphur Take a look at this galaxy.NGC 7603 Red shift doesn't rationalize this but having the light being refracted by perhaps two intervening layers of dark matter, one in the main galaxy and one in the proto galaxy will.
hubble-photo-brightest-galaxy-gravitational-lens
This galaxy is so bright because it is so close the the galaxy that is lensing it yet is supposed to be twice as far away. Double lensing again. Occam's razor.
@DiogenesofCalgary To be useful and successful, a new theory needs to explain ALL the observations the current theories predict, and then predict something as-yet unobserved or something observed that the current theory doesn't explain. You can't just pick out examples that support your idea and ignore the millions of observations that might disprove it. The burden of proof is on you, and that proof must be in mathematically derived predictions consistent with observation.
@Nyphur I agree with what you are saying and when Doppler red shift fails to explain NGC7603 I think you at least have to start to question it. I'm too lazy to give you mathematical proof and perhaps it's beyond my capabilities. Also with only 500 characters at my disposal it's hard to give a meaningful explanation. But there are several ways of testing this, but I don't have a telescope or a way to measure "red shift". Do you?
@DiogenesofCalgary I doubt you're too lazy to provide the maths, I just don't think you have any. And if you haven't got the maths, you haven't got a theory. A physical theory is not a collection of vague ideas that someone has a hunch might be right, written in plain english. It's a set of rules written in mathematics that makes observable predictions about the world, and when any observation contradicts it, the theory is wrong. The burden of proof is on you.
@Nyphur I understand you view in that you want proof. I however regard this as a public forum for thought and discussion. I did try to work on the geometry and if you search for "The Effects of an Index of Refraction for Dark Matter.xlsx" perhaps it will show up. You can take it or leave it.
Couldn't it be more easily said thus: While the matter and space of the universe is expanding, the dark matter is contracting? Doesn't it then lend to the idea of equal and opposite reactions?
Having just watched 6 Dimensions, Extra Dimensions, and Dark Matter back-to-back, it seems an obvious suggestion that the anomalies we see in gravity distribution would be caused by something going on outside of our 4 observable time-space dimensions. Perhaps a video to explain how this compares to the hunt for exotic "dark matter" particles?
I have one problem with the theory of dark matter existing while interacting with itself and with gravity. The problem is that it would, in the same way as with regular matter, converge in very small spaces and form dark matter back holes. Now if those existed we would be able to observe them in much the same way we observe black holes consisting of matter, and with the ratio of darkmatter to matter being so high you'd think they'd be more commonly observable, and also by conventional methods.
There almost certainly *is* dark matter in black holes; there's no reason for black holes to be made purely of normal or dark matter; they'll all have some quantity of each. But a black hole has exactly 3 properties: it has mass, it has electric charge, and it has angular momentum. Electric charge is likely neutral as it is with any large concentration of matter; this leaves mass and angular momentum, neither of which distinguish between dark and ordinary matter.
I have one problem with the theory of dark matter existing while interacting with itself and with gravity. The problem is that it would, in the same way as with regular matter, converge in very small spaces and form dark matter back holes. Now if those existed we would be able to observe them in much the same way we observe black holes consisting of matter, and with the ratio of darkmatter to matter being so high you'd think they'd be more commonly observable, and also by conventional methods.
I have one problem with the theory of dark matter existing while interacting with itself and with gravity. The problem is that it would, in the same way as with regular matter, converge in very small spaces and form dark matter back holes. Now if those existed we would be able to observe them in much the same way we observe black holes consisting of matter, and with the ratio of darkmatter to matter being so high you'd think they'd be more commonly observable, and also by conventional methods.
I have one problem with the theory of dark matter existing while interacting with itself and with gravity. The problem is that it would, in the same way as with regular matter, converge in very small spaces and form dark matter back holes. Now if those existed we would be able to observe them in much the same way we observe black holes consisting of matter, and with the ratio of darkmatter to matter being so high you'd think they'd be more commonly observable, and also by conventional methods.
Whenever I think about dark matter I think something simple but not yet understood might be the explanation. People thought a substance called phogiston is the source of combustion. That electromagnetic waves used to travel in a strange medium called the "ether".
I bet dark matter and dark energy are like those two.
I want the brightest minds to keep poking at the problem untill they find out what is most likely to be going on.
The radio active are like purest energy of acid that liquified hard materials like a stomach acid reaction. So the universe are begining to look like that we are all inside Zeus digestionsystem that repeated again and again without end.
This is nothing more than Theoretical Physics and if it isn't it should be.
These people present no obversation or experimentation for dark matter/dark energy theory. My theory on this subject is just as valid as dark matter/energy, is mine taught as fact in schools, colleges and other learning centers ?
This isn't education it's indoctrination, teach our beliefs and we'll reward you.
@HubsNetwork can u explain something that is not made up of atoms ? that cannot be seen or felt , If we ignore science , We won't even know that Dark matter exist :D If we ignore science , we would have never known the earth was round , the gravity , vaccines , nothing :D Talk of the great life science has gives you as a theory lol
Internet is a theory right ? :P Computers and AI and robots are a theory right ? our brain is a theory right ? lol
@djay00009 Years ago people would have argued that the speed of light couldnt be broken, we would have had these people saying it was impossible to break the speed of light and teaching it as fact.
This, infact, holds up the advancement of the science, because people don't question it or challenge it, they just nod and get brainwashed, then go and teach others the same rubbish.
@HubsNetwork Tell me something , Okay , Science does question itself , but you are saying Science is wrong and we should not teach it , Okay , I get it, If we do not teach science , then What do you suppose we teach Religion ? What do you think children should be taught about the origin of life ? What do you think we should teach people about Dark matter and periodic table ? Tell me, I wanna know what do you think should we teach people ?
@djay00009 Physics is my passion, I'm not saying don't teach science, I'm saying teach all the theories, not just 1 as fact.
20 years ago you would have been laughed out of a job if you wanted to study time travel for example, this is very wrong and very damaging to the advancement of science.
I would teach that we are all 1, that the universe is fractal in nature and like a chaos pattern, change 1 tiny point and the whole is changed. I would teach that you are God because of this.
@HubsNetwork we are god ? hmm , Well , the universe keeps changing, Even if a bit is changed , doesn't mean the whole is changed , but if you ask me , We should teach them science , but we should also illustrate that :
1) This is what we know till the present moment , and it might be wrong , but atleast it gives us a platform to think ahead
2) Darwin's theory of life was not perfect but it gave people an idea and basis to research ahead to find the rights and wrong of the specific theory
@HubsNetwork Darwin's theory was made long ago , I think i can give him credit for what he did, but i agree there must be many errors with it , Thats why we have modern evolutionary theories
Also we are god , hopefully in a few thousand years when we can change the planets around us and extend far in space :D Interesting concept , A lot like Buddha
@djay00009 Pitty the world isn't awake. Sadly, I agree, people just don't understand even the basics.
I'm sure even the presenters of these videos get frustrated they can't share their personal opinions or theories with students, I'm sure they're under a strict curriculum with little spare time. But with the internet we're in the information age, global knowledge should be increasing exponentially. Let's explore some of the more exotic theories.
@HubsNetwork and if you ask me, they are not saying that Dark matter is this and that , They are not teaching you that it has a property or it behaves in a certain , but they are trying to find out what they really are . I think Dark matter should be taught cause most people in the world don't even know that there are things other than Atoms in the universe or the matter we see . Somewhere in the future the dark matter theory will be experimented,I don't think we have the technology
@HubsNetwork Also I think Dark matter does exist , the thing she said about stars revolving around the center or core of the galaxy , and the ones on outer arms at different speeds is quite true , It should be that way , but if it is not , there must be something responsible for it , Call it dark matter or whatever , This is a very tough thing to study , in my opinion , it is theoretical physics , and just explains how less we know about the universe
@djay00009 I'll give you an example, Tesla, what were you taught about him in school? Anything about his ideas on free energy transmitted through the air ? I don't remember hearing his name at school ever.
I'm an electrical engineer by trade, I understand how a tesla coil works, I understand its circuitry and I understand how it could be used in reverse with slight modifcations to the circuitry to pull energy from the air.
I'd like to see the presenters explore these types of things.
@HubsNetwork spot on ,i agree about Tesla, Im a physics student, I just love Cosmology , Im a commerce student , but I studied Tesla a bit , And also The Tesla motor Cooperation :D they should teach about Tesla in schools definitely .
@HubsNetwork Seen vids here where they recharge mobiles non-contact. It's only viable as a "national grid" if you nationalise energy consumption..and meter it from a central source. where's the competition? Maybe if it was decentralised at first...like solar hot water on houses would it get a foothold in the market.
Interesting concept, do you have a link for these videos?
I don't think we should ever have to pay for utilities.
Utility companies shouldn't even be run for profit either, anything they do make should be reinvested in upgrades or new technology, which should be paid for from any tax we pay.
just recharging cell phones wirelessly by magnetic induction, but it's real tesla stuff and you can buy it. what if all your appliances were charged by induction in your house...say through the floor or ceiling like central heating? Would be cool huh!
i think.. its aliens on the other planets using graavitational wells to attract the other planets so thier trade routes don't get messed up.. yep.. definately that.
@neonphysics While MOND theories might have a chance at explaining the acceleration of universal expansion, they cannot replace DM. Modified gravity has been ruled out by solid observational evidence. e.g. the Bullet Cluster. A good explanation of why MOND theories can't work is here: /watch?v=SwyTaSt0XxE#t=37m0s
Even scientists working on MOND theories acknowledge that DM is necessary. And besides, we actually *map* DM with grav lensing. Gravity is a perfectly valid way of observing things.
If dark matter is just like normal matter (as in, gravitationally), but which doesn't interact with normal matter, wouldn't it clump together and form solar systems of orbiting spheres of dark matter just like normal matter does? If not, then why not?
In another video, I do not remember which one, a man was talking about how there could be parallel/extra dimensions, and the way we would notice these parallel/extra dimensions is the gravity they impart on our dimension. Seeing as how this dark matter is everywhere and imparts gravity on our matter, could it signify extra/parallel dimensions?
@damianpaz It represents dark energy (watch from 0:39). I hope the piece is going to be used for an other video about this mysterious part of the universe.
@Sachaztan Yes, the first time I saw the video was paying more attention to the cake than to the gal. Let's blame that english isn't my first language. lol
@kalekrug The video indicated that it is dark energy. Anti-matter makes up a negligible amount of the universe. Much much less than normal matter. Much less than the 3/4 it represents.
Is it just me, or did the thumbnail of this video have her touching her fingers together as if to say "I finally have you, batman!"? Of course, I believe there was a sinister smile included.
@hooloovoo1st it's just me saying when the universe was forming the first that was created is dark energy and that energy combined with it self creating dark matter the some of that dark matter became real matter that we know ....
@ma356289 My point was that there's no basis for saying that. Unless you can describe why and how something like this would occur, and why and how it would lead to the result you suggest, you're just pulling ideas out of thin air. What you're saying is way, way, way too vague to be meaningful.
Using only what I learned from this video I will explain why we can't find the dark matter in the room... It's because if you look at the pink colors on the computer you'll notice it's taking up a great deal of space compared to the "normal matter" i.e. stars, galaxies, etc. Therefore there will be a miniscule amount in the room compared to "normal" matter in the room. May I have a piece of pie then? ^_^
@happyemo4life She said neutralinos, not neutrinos. Neutrinos (and anti) are already understood pretty well insofar as their mass contribution. Dark matter/energy =/= antineutrinos.
Minor gripe here, I spent a long time not really getting the difference between The Universe and the The Observable Universe and I think this is quite common among non scientists. So it is good to hear the first Prof refer to the energy density of the universe but then we get the pie which represents the "entire matter and energy budget in the universe". This is exactly the sort thing that backs up confusion about the size of the universe - someone taking about it as if it is definitely finite.
@chrisofnottingham The "Universe" is the complete totality of all that exists. The "Observable Universe" is the portion of the Universe that humans are currently aware of. Anyhow, the Universe can neither be infinite nor finite. And yet, simultaneously it is both.
@itsMinuteMaid Actually the "Observable Universe" is the theoretical limit to what might be observed. But anyway, my point was referring to the "entire matter and energy budget in the universe" is a misleading thing to say. Referring to the energy density of the universe is so much better.
Since Meghan mentioned folding proteins, it might be a good time to mention Folding@Home by the University of Stanford. Google for Folding@Home for information on how you can help research in numerous diseases.
Shes so beautiful
MeloCloud 6 hours ago
smallest slice for the cameraman :D
d4v3tm 1 day ago
1:29 She is so urging to put it in her mouth :P
TheDigitalStone 4 days ago
I'm hungry right now
LutzDerLurch 1 week ago
Notice the fire installation at 11:24. It looks similar to the one the professor talks about at the RS!
Treenaks 1 week ago
Consider this. There is no dark energy because the universe is not expanding, ie there is no big bang theory. Dark matter exists, and the Opera experiment not only confirms this but provides us with the index of refraction for dark matter in this area of the galaxy.
DiogenesofCalgary 1 week ago
@DiogenesofCalgary Unfortunately for that thought, there's a great deal of experimental evidence suggesting that the universe is expanding. To have a cosmological theory that doesn't have an expanding universe, you'll need a way to explain that evidence in terms of something else that you can test.
Nyphur 1 week ago
@DiogenesofCalgary You should use the reply button next to a comment to discuss it. If you comment on someone's channel, they can't respond.
Nyphur 6 days ago
@Nyphur Sorry I'm sort of new to this. I have pretty well all the proof that any person would want. I'm going to change the name of dark matter to Claire matter. If you want I can demonstrate it for you. Easy smeasy.
DiogenesofCalgary 6 days ago
@DiogenesofCalgary I don't want to seem mean, but you can't overturn the big bang theory by posting youtube videos of an idea about refraction causing redshift, and you don't get to name stuff after yourself. To prove the idea is even plausible, you need to come up with a mathematical model of it and prove that it accurately predicts all current observations. If that's easy smeasy, then go right ahead. Hell, can you even prove that refraction can cause an effect like redshift?
Nyphur 5 days ago
@Nyphur Take a look at this galaxy.NGC 7603 Red shift doesn't rationalize this but having the light being refracted by perhaps two intervening layers of dark matter, one in the main galaxy and one in the proto galaxy will.
hubble-photo-brightest-galaxy-gravitational-lens
This galaxy is so bright because it is so close the the galaxy that is lensing it yet is supposed to be twice as far away. Double lensing again. Occam's razor.
DiogenesofCalgary 5 days ago
@DiogenesofCalgary To be useful and successful, a new theory needs to explain ALL the observations the current theories predict, and then predict something as-yet unobserved or something observed that the current theory doesn't explain. You can't just pick out examples that support your idea and ignore the millions of observations that might disprove it. The burden of proof is on you, and that proof must be in mathematically derived predictions consistent with observation.
Nyphur 5 days ago
@Nyphur I agree with what you are saying and when Doppler red shift fails to explain NGC7603 I think you at least have to start to question it. I'm too lazy to give you mathematical proof and perhaps it's beyond my capabilities. Also with only 500 characters at my disposal it's hard to give a meaningful explanation. But there are several ways of testing this, but I don't have a telescope or a way to measure "red shift". Do you?
DiogenesofCalgary 5 days ago
@DiogenesofCalgary I doubt you're too lazy to provide the maths, I just don't think you have any. And if you haven't got the maths, you haven't got a theory. A physical theory is not a collection of vague ideas that someone has a hunch might be right, written in plain english. It's a set of rules written in mathematics that makes observable predictions about the world, and when any observation contradicts it, the theory is wrong. The burden of proof is on you.
Nyphur 5 days ago
@Nyphur I understand you view in that you want proof. I however regard this as a public forum for thought and discussion. I did try to work on the geometry and if you search for "The Effects of an Index of Refraction for Dark Matter.xlsx" perhaps it will show up. You can take it or leave it.
DiogenesofCalgary 20 hours ago
Heheh, I laughed so hard at 5:17, because of "get bent". :D
antiHUMANDesigns 1 week ago
Came here for the physics, but stayed for the chocolate pie...
faer12 1 week ago
Did you use what you learned doing the vuvuzela video with Prof. Moriarty to enhance Megan's voice in this clip?
watermelonygoodness 2 weeks ago in playlist Autres vidéos de sixtysymbols
or matter makes space
masluxx 2 weeks ago
Couldn't it be more easily said thus: While the matter and space of the universe is expanding, the dark matter is contracting? Doesn't it then lend to the idea of equal and opposite reactions?
teknotoast 2 weeks ago
is it possible for dark matter to create its own dark matter planets and galaxies?
B2theYBroWny 3 weeks ago
I WANT PIE
munke2 3 weeks ago
Dark matter tastes nice
hackum1 3 weeks ago
Having just watched 6 Dimensions, Extra Dimensions, and Dark Matter back-to-back, it seems an obvious suggestion that the anomalies we see in gravity distribution would be caused by something going on outside of our 4 observable time-space dimensions. Perhaps a video to explain how this compares to the hunt for exotic "dark matter" particles?
MattStum 3 weeks ago
I have one problem with the theory of dark matter existing while interacting with itself and with gravity. The problem is that it would, in the same way as with regular matter, converge in very small spaces and form dark matter back holes. Now if those existed we would be able to observe them in much the same way we observe black holes consisting of matter, and with the ratio of darkmatter to matter being so high you'd think they'd be more commonly observable, and also by conventional methods.
mynameismatt2010 4 weeks ago
@mynameismatt2010
There almost certainly *is* dark matter in black holes; there's no reason for black holes to be made purely of normal or dark matter; they'll all have some quantity of each. But a black hole has exactly 3 properties: it has mass, it has electric charge, and it has angular momentum. Electric charge is likely neutral as it is with any large concentration of matter; this leaves mass and angular momentum, neither of which distinguish between dark and ordinary matter.
pseudorandomly 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have one problem with the theory of dark matter existing while interacting with itself and with gravity. The problem is that it would, in the same way as with regular matter, converge in very small spaces and form dark matter back holes. Now if those existed we would be able to observe them in much the same way we observe black holes consisting of matter, and with the ratio of darkmatter to matter being so high you'd think they'd be more commonly observable, and also by conventional methods.
mynameismatt2010 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have one problem with the theory of dark matter existing while interacting with itself and with gravity. The problem is that it would, in the same way as with regular matter, converge in very small spaces and form dark matter back holes. Now if those existed we would be able to observe them in much the same way we observe black holes consisting of matter, and with the ratio of darkmatter to matter being so high you'd think they'd be more commonly observable, and also by conventional methods.
mynameismatt2010 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have one problem with the theory of dark matter existing while interacting with itself and with gravity. The problem is that it would, in the same way as with regular matter, converge in very small spaces and form dark matter back holes. Now if those existed we would be able to observe them in much the same way we observe black holes consisting of matter, and with the ratio of darkmatter to matter being so high you'd think they'd be more commonly observable, and also by conventional methods.
mynameismatt2010 4 weeks ago
The aether, The Higgs field, dark matter...their probably all the same thing. see you in stockholm.
MindCrazedBanjo 1 month ago
5:00 ^_^
samanbandana 1 month ago
Comment removed
LaBderErste 1 month ago
did you get to eat the pie in the end?
slondsha 1 month ago
My Little Pony Physics Presentation.
yep, that's why I'm here.
MidnightRedemption 1 month ago
I need to borrow their computer for my chess program. :)
But seriously, I hope one day they will apply a supercomputer to help solve endgame chess tablebases. Could be very profitable for them too.
serendipicus 1 month ago
I CAME HERE FOR THE DARK MATTER AND WHO KNOWS THAT THE PIE WILL INTEREST ME MORE
TheJaws0413 1 month ago 16
mmm i want the pie
TheThereseee 1 month ago
Great video. If dark matter is here now and in our solar system, why isn't there evidence of planets not moving at the right speed around the sun?
cdmackay 1 month ago
Feynman would be able to find it if he was here.
saganemc2 1 month ago
Whenever I think about dark matter I think something simple but not yet understood might be the explanation. People thought a substance called phogiston is the source of combustion. That electromagnetic waves used to travel in a strange medium called the "ether".
I bet dark matter and dark energy are like those two.
I want the brightest minds to keep poking at the problem untill they find out what is most likely to be going on.
conoba 1 month ago 6
Is it just me or does dark matter remind you a bit of the old concept of ether?
aluisious 1 month ago
Hate to admit it, but when he said "hah, it's dark" it sounded a little like something Butthead would say.
aluisious 1 month ago
The radio active are like purest energy of acid that liquified hard materials like a stomach acid reaction. So the universe are begining to look like that we are all inside Zeus digestionsystem that repeated again and again without end.
Sonyoooo3 1 month ago
@labobo No, i don't think so. ; )
krapptacular 2 months ago
That dark matter simulation was truly awesome. The brief look at the supercomputer was pretty cool as well.
spawnfan101 2 months ago
I think we might have to get off this planet in order to solve this problem.
krapptacular 2 months ago
children are kept up at night by monsters
physicist are kept up by dark matter
elflordbob1 2 months ago
haha the guy with the glasses lokks like charlie from charlieissocoollike if he were old
101elchuy 2 months ago
Pie charts with actual pies!!!!
EPIC WIN
aureusyarara 2 months ago
i would love to marry her
smart with a stunning smile
654357 2 months ago
Am I the only one here thinking of the Dark Matter Ponies presentation?
EvilChicken666 2 months ago
I'm not sure why everyone is calling the chocolate pie a cake
ErizotDread 2 months ago
@ErizotDread Because its a cake
Gitars5 2 months ago
@sixtysymbols who is that woman shes beautiful :)
SPACEtimeContinumumb 3 months ago
shes sexy as fuck
SPACEtimeContinumumb 3 months ago
@lotmein20 i sense a bit of sarcasm
01rai01 3 months ago
I loled so hard when she places the cake on the table after she cut it.
mnathan88 3 months ago
Fritzicky Likes Chocolate Cake !
BarleyYorkshireMan 3 months ago
Is anybody else hungry now?
NictraSavios 3 months ago
bet the computer cant run crysis 2
01rai01 3 months ago
She looks into your soul at 3:50 :S
TheFaregas 4 months ago
the budget is only enough for a cake... sure :D
TheNachter 4 months ago
not the cake analogy
please
bluewhale18 4 months ago
I predict that in the next 20 years computers will be 10 times the size and so expensive that only the 3 richest kings can afford them.
JezaLoki 4 months ago
@JezaLoki LOL! gold plated and studded with jewels no doubt. ;) you funny-ass sarcastic fucker! thumbs up.
breaneainn 4 months ago
This is nothing more than Theoretical Physics and if it isn't it should be.
These people present no obversation or experimentation for dark matter/dark energy theory. My theory on this subject is just as valid as dark matter/energy, is mine taught as fact in schools, colleges and other learning centers ?
This isn't education it's indoctrination, teach our beliefs and we'll reward you.
HubsNetwork 4 months ago
This is science for you, they were missing 98% of the mass of the universe in their broken models, so they invented dark matter and dark energy.
Same for weak and strong for, just made it up...
This isnt science at all, this isnt education, this is all pure theory being taught as fact....
HubsNetwork 4 months ago
@HubsNetwork can u explain something that is not made up of atoms ? that cannot be seen or felt , If we ignore science , We won't even know that Dark matter exist :D If we ignore science , we would have never known the earth was round , the gravity , vaccines , nothing :D Talk of the great life science has gives you as a theory lol
Internet is a theory right ? :P Computers and AI and robots are a theory right ? our brain is a theory right ? lol
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 Years ago people would have argued that the speed of light couldnt be broken, we would have had these people saying it was impossible to break the speed of light and teaching it as fact.
This, infact, holds up the advancement of the science, because people don't question it or challenge it, they just nod and get brainwashed, then go and teach others the same rubbish.
HubsNetwork 4 months ago
@HubsNetwork Tell me something , Okay , Science does question itself , but you are saying Science is wrong and we should not teach it , Okay , I get it, If we do not teach science , then What do you suppose we teach Religion ? What do you think children should be taught about the origin of life ? What do you think we should teach people about Dark matter and periodic table ? Tell me, I wanna know what do you think should we teach people ?
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 Physics is my passion, I'm not saying don't teach science, I'm saying teach all the theories, not just 1 as fact.
20 years ago you would have been laughed out of a job if you wanted to study time travel for example, this is very wrong and very damaging to the advancement of science.
I would teach that we are all 1, that the universe is fractal in nature and like a chaos pattern, change 1 tiny point and the whole is changed. I would teach that you are God because of this.
HubsNetwork 4 months ago
@HubsNetwork we are god ? hmm , Well , the universe keeps changing, Even if a bit is changed , doesn't mean the whole is changed , but if you ask me , We should teach them science , but we should also illustrate that :
1) This is what we know till the present moment , and it might be wrong , but atleast it gives us a platform to think ahead
2) Darwin's theory of life was not perfect but it gave people an idea and basis to research ahead to find the rights and wrong of the specific theory
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 We have the power to shape the universe around us, so we are Gods.
1, I can agree with
2, hmmm, don't know about Darwin's theory of evolution. Rh- blood has no place on the planet according to Darwin.
HubsNetwork 4 months ago
@HubsNetwork Darwin's theory was made long ago , I think i can give him credit for what he did, but i agree there must be many errors with it , Thats why we have modern evolutionary theories
Also we are god , hopefully in a few thousand years when we can change the planets around us and extend far in space :D Interesting concept , A lot like Buddha
We are awakened :D
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 Pitty the world isn't awake. Sadly, I agree, people just don't understand even the basics.
I'm sure even the presenters of these videos get frustrated they can't share their personal opinions or theories with students, I'm sure they're under a strict curriculum with little spare time. But with the internet we're in the information age, global knowledge should be increasing exponentially. Let's explore some of the more exotic theories.
HubsNetwork 4 months ago
@HubsNetwork and if you ask me, they are not saying that Dark matter is this and that , They are not teaching you that it has a property or it behaves in a certain , but they are trying to find out what they really are . I think Dark matter should be taught cause most people in the world don't even know that there are things other than Atoms in the universe or the matter we see . Somewhere in the future the dark matter theory will be experimented,I don't think we have the technology
djay00009 4 months ago
@HubsNetwork Also I think Dark matter does exist , the thing she said about stars revolving around the center or core of the galaxy , and the ones on outer arms at different speeds is quite true , It should be that way , but if it is not , there must be something responsible for it , Call it dark matter or whatever , This is a very tough thing to study , in my opinion , it is theoretical physics , and just explains how less we know about the universe
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 I'll give you an example, Tesla, what were you taught about him in school? Anything about his ideas on free energy transmitted through the air ? I don't remember hearing his name at school ever.
I'm an electrical engineer by trade, I understand how a tesla coil works, I understand its circuitry and I understand how it could be used in reverse with slight modifcations to the circuitry to pull energy from the air.
I'd like to see the presenters explore these types of things.
HubsNetwork 4 months ago
@HubsNetwork spot on ,i agree about Tesla, Im a physics student, I just love Cosmology , Im a commerce student , but I studied Tesla a bit , And also The Tesla motor Cooperation :D they should teach about Tesla in schools definitely .
djay00009 4 months ago
@HubsNetwork Seen vids here where they recharge mobiles non-contact. It's only viable as a "national grid" if you nationalise energy consumption..and meter it from a central source. where's the competition? Maybe if it was decentralised at first...like solar hot water on houses would it get a foothold in the market.
Just an idea.
breaneainn 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Interesting concept, do you have a link for these videos?
I don't think we should ever have to pay for utilities.
Utility companies shouldn't even be run for profit either, anything they do make should be reinvested in upgrades or new technology, which should be paid for from any tax we pay.
I shouldn't have to pay simply to live.
HubsNetwork 4 months ago 11
@HubsNetwork youtube.com/watch?v=6lTdGyFxTbE&feature=related
just recharging cell phones wirelessly by magnetic induction, but it's real tesla stuff and you can buy it. what if all your appliances were charged by induction in your house...say through the floor or ceiling like central heating? Would be cool huh!
breaneainn 4 months ago
i think.. its aliens on the other planets using graavitational wells to attract the other planets so thier trade routes don't get messed up.. yep.. definately that.
Noximous 4 months ago
So she just ate about a- Wait! Where the fuck did my arm go?!
ZombieMonkeyNZ 4 months ago
it is a figment of a theorists imagination. we dont understand gravity at the galactic scale
neonphysics 4 months ago
@neonphysics While MOND theories might have a chance at explaining the acceleration of universal expansion, they cannot replace DM. Modified gravity has been ruled out by solid observational evidence. e.g. the Bullet Cluster. A good explanation of why MOND theories can't work is here: /watch?v=SwyTaSt0XxE#t=37m0s
Even scientists working on MOND theories acknowledge that DM is necessary. And besides, we actually *map* DM with grav lensing. Gravity is a perfectly valid way of observing things.
sbergman27 4 months ago
chocolate pie + CO2(in supercritical state) --------> (de-theobrominated)chocolate icecream
Damianingus 5 months ago
Comment removed
LeconsdAnalyse 5 months ago
What about that dark matter is made of Higg's bosons?
GumokCZ 5 months ago
Can anyone answer this?:
If dark matter is just like normal matter (as in, gravitationally), but which doesn't interact with normal matter, wouldn't it clump together and form solar systems of orbiting spheres of dark matter just like normal matter does? If not, then why not?
jamma246 5 months ago
Comment removed
LeconsdAnalyse 5 months ago
I know what dark matter is. Black paint.
Tridecalogism 5 months ago
hi
zeb120 5 months ago in playlist 2
invisible and everywhere .. sure you aren't talking about god? :p
kbhunl 5 months ago
Why don't you ask the prof from 0:03 questions anymore? He's my favorite!
ipodvidoe 5 months ago
THE PIE IS A LIE!!
scriptslayer 5 months ago
WIMP
2xsf 5 months ago
Wow she;s so hot! I'd like to give her a slice of my pie!!
CelticReject 5 months ago
Comment removed
zeb120 5 months ago
@zeb120 WHAT IS YOUR MAJOR MALFUNCTION NUMNUTS? DIDN'T MOMMY AND DADDY SHOW ENOUGH ATTENTION WHEN YOU WERE A CHILD?
TheRohBoat 5 months ago
Comment removed
zeb120 5 months ago
@zeb120 no
TheRohBoat 5 months ago
@TheRohBoat
yes u rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
zeb120 5 months ago
gosh, who would have thought that matter actually is so delicious? Damn, now i can't take a look on anything without getting hungry.
MattROFL 5 months ago
It's not a pie, it's a tart......
supermanondrugs1 6 months ago
i want some pie
Kraized 6 months ago
futurama
kingaxron 6 months ago
It was actually just a glimpse, but was Dr Gray in a blessed state? I bet the pie disappeared very quickly...
soberek 6 months ago
I refuse to make a portal joke about the cake.
suburiboy 6 months ago 5
@suburiboy Good thing, especially since it ain't a cake. It's a pie.
Sachaztan 6 months ago
LOL that cake looks amazing
phsycomusicpower 6 months ago
Is there Light Matter? ;D
DJBassEnergy 6 months ago
in 6 months my cellphone will have moore computing power, nice investment!
bemil 6 months ago
she is so beautiful and smart :)
kingkoopa11 7 months ago
Homer Simpson: "Dark matter, hummm!"
trespire 7 months ago
you cannot see the forest because of all these trees
TheNachter 7 months ago
that is nutella and bread...
TheNachter 7 months ago
In another video, I do not remember which one, a man was talking about how there could be parallel/extra dimensions, and the way we would notice these parallel/extra dimensions is the gravity they impart on our dimension. Seeing as how this dark matter is everywhere and imparts gravity on our matter, could it signify extra/parallel dimensions?
ishthealaskan 7 months ago
Dark matter went ninja mode.
Srjl 7 months ago
is dark matter influenced by temrature? like would it help to try find it in a zero. or near zero kelvin enviroment?
RandySilverWolf 7 months ago
could you play a video game on one of those super computers?
HectorL360 7 months ago
Your chocolate, and i bet u taste better than you smell... hmmm... pie...
CorusSasori 7 months ago
sixty symbols is awesome.
Gonko100 7 months ago
I wonder what the biggest slice hidden behind the laptop represents?
damianpaz 7 months ago 32
@damianpaz It represents dark energy (watch from 0:39). I hope the piece is going to be used for an other video about this mysterious part of the universe.
goldcup79 7 months ago
@goldcup79 me too!
damianpaz 7 months ago
@damianpaz the US defense budget
MrJimbob91389 7 months ago
@damianpaz If you listened you would know that the biggest slice was Dark Energy.
Sachaztan 6 months ago
@Sachaztan Yes, the first time I saw the video was paying more attention to the cake than to the gal. Let's blame that english isn't my first language. lol
damianpaz 6 months ago
@damianpaz anti matter i think... could be wrong
kalekrug 6 months ago
@kalekrug The video indicated that it is dark energy. Anti-matter makes up a negligible amount of the universe. Much much less than normal matter. Much less than the 3/4 it represents.
Aviatorsmith 6 months ago
@damianpaz Dark energy
grizzli1994 6 months ago 6
@damianpaz it's dark energy, the other unknown repulsive force that we attribute to the rapid expansion of the universe.
TheElephantShoe 5 months ago
@damianpaz Dark energy.
Ichvyenichalster 5 months ago
@damianpaz Dark energy? like she said?
emikochan13 5 months ago
@damianpaz her lunch :)
fmuldoony 5 months ago
@damianpaz she did mention it. its Dark Energy
demosthenets 5 months ago
@damianpaz Dark energy, and having unprotected sex with strangers...sorry didn't mean to put words in your mouth.
breaneainn 4 months ago
@damianpaz she just said dark energy
lefthandovRA 4 months ago
shocker she used baked goods to illustrate a point. women...
sschhuu 7 months ago 19
@sschhuu mmm baked goods...mmm women....mmm theoretical particle physics...ARE YOU GAY? SNAP OUT OF IT MAN! how good can it get?
breaneainn 4 months ago
@sschhuu the other GUY with the glasses did that too when explaining a quark
timewasteland 4 months ago
@sschhuu u mean just like the male professor used cheese to illustrate quraks ??
lefthandovRA 4 months ago
Imagne if everything we know about math and physichs is totaly wrong and dark matter/energy does not exist.
kravenraze 7 months ago
Let's see one about dark energy!
FooDanger 7 months ago
Is it just me, or did the thumbnail of this video have her touching her fingers together as if to say "I finally have you, batman!"? Of course, I believe there was a sinister smile included.
ludikalo 8 months ago
I WANT THAT PIE!!!!
TheIdealGasLaw 8 months ago 2
some physicist believe that sparticles (super particles) make up dark matter.
RAYtheIMAN 8 months ago
Anyone else want to find that supercomputer and play a crap load of games on it?
Ace31323 8 months ago
i think that matter is created from a complicated mixture dark matter and dark dark energy
ma356289 8 months ago
@ma356289 Why?
hooloovoo1st 8 months ago
@hooloovoo1st it's just me saying when the universe was forming the first that was created is dark energy and that energy combined with it self creating dark matter the some of that dark matter became real matter that we know ....
ma356289 8 months ago
@ma356289 My point was that there's no basis for saying that. Unless you can describe why and how something like this would occur, and why and how it would lead to the result you suggest, you're just pulling ideas out of thin air. What you're saying is way, way, way too vague to be meaningful.
hooloovoo1st 8 months ago
@sixtysymbols i agree with happyemo4life, is dark energy like anti-neutrinos?
AlexIsSmalll 8 months ago
Comment removed
SmartGuy55260 8 months ago
10:38 thug life lol
SmartGuy55260 8 months ago 2
Using only what I learned from this video I will explain why we can't find the dark matter in the room... It's because if you look at the pink colors on the computer you'll notice it's taking up a great deal of space compared to the "normal matter" i.e. stars, galaxies, etc. Therefore there will be a miniscule amount in the room compared to "normal" matter in the room. May I have a piece of pie then? ^_^
geniegogo 8 months ago
That does look awfully good...
tiger55331 9 months ago
you make me feel stupid
fanman293 9 months ago
hang on then, so if dark matter is akin to neutrinos, dark energy would be anti-neutrinos?
happyemo4life 9 months ago
@happyemo4life She said neutralinos, not neutrinos. Neutrinos (and anti) are already understood pretty well insofar as their mass contribution. Dark matter/energy =/= antineutrinos.
hooloovoo1st 8 months ago
Minor gripe here, I spent a long time not really getting the difference between The Universe and the The Observable Universe and I think this is quite common among non scientists. So it is good to hear the first Prof refer to the energy density of the universe but then we get the pie which represents the "entire matter and energy budget in the universe". This is exactly the sort thing that backs up confusion about the size of the universe - someone taking about it as if it is definitely finite.
chrisofnottingham 9 months ago
@chrisofnottingham The "Universe" is the complete totality of all that exists. The "Observable Universe" is the portion of the Universe that humans are currently aware of. Anyhow, the Universe can neither be infinite nor finite. And yet, simultaneously it is both.
itsMinuteMaid 9 months ago 2
@itsMinuteMaid Actually the "Observable Universe" is the theoretical limit to what might be observed. But anyway, my point was referring to the "entire matter and energy budget in the universe" is a misleading thing to say. Referring to the energy density of the universe is so much better.
chrisofnottingham 9 months ago
the cake is a lie.
MrSleepoholic 9 months ago
Good video, much more informative than other i viewed on dark matter on youtube.
Subscribing :)
anonymviolin 9 months ago
neptune is pootheling along. i love the technical terms
dannyb21892 9 months ago
DDON'T EAT IT!
RoGeorgeRoGeorge 9 months ago
@UserNamei5 Ok, thanks for the info
R4Z0RxTutorials 9 months ago
Boy... imagine how good Black Ops would run on that Supercomputer.. :D
robdotcom71 9 months ago
Since Meghan mentioned folding proteins, it might be a good time to mention Folding@Home by the University of Stanford. Google for Folding@Home for information on how you can help research in numerous diseases.
Muscleduck 10 months ago