USA used weak economic position of Yugoslavia to create chaos and destruction THAT is what USA is the most famous for.
NOW if you do not understand what happened in Yugoslavia or if you learned it from the NEWS Please do not post dumb Comments , Please , It will make my nervous system last longer.
He's like a thousand years old and he came from the Republican wing that emphasizes realpolitik, something not terribly in vogue with either Republicans or Democrats now. I don't think he has any kind of real influence on US foreign policy post-Reagan. I'd not take his words too seriously as he's not much more than just another foreign policy expert, there is abundance of them, that may talk about all kinds of stuff but usually fail to capture what the sitting administration really plans to do.
"People talk about reform in Russia... I don't think we have much of an opportunity to affect domestic politics in Moscow"...
And this is basically the essence of US foreign policymakers' measure of foreign country's democracy and liberty - if we can't affect the country's policy, the regime is dictatorial and it has to reform until it serves our best interests.
It's all about the imposition of laissez-faire through shock doctrine at global level.
Read the info to the video. He hints! He doesn't reveal anything here, but you can draw your own conclusions from what he says. Then you will understand the origin of both NATO wars against the Serbian people.
I don't dispute his "hints", as you call them, and certainly, you've been most informative in your description. However, the thing that I do argue about, is the fact that when someone (that's not from Bosnia like I am) watches this, he's not going to draw a parallel to the situation in Bosnia and Serbia, no matter what you write in the description.
Only solid words coming out of his mouth will suffice for people that don't know the root of the problem, so to speak. Do you understand?
Well, if anyone doubts that there was a crisis within NATO after the collpas of the Berlin Wall, this is ought to change their mind. In addition, here Kissinger explains why the organization is so crucial for the United States to survive. So it's no wonder how far the Americans would go to see that happen.
@mickeypopa NATO = American military occupation of Europe = selling arms to all their Satellites = Money = Empire = everything they want
How to justify a defensive pact against Communism that no longer existed? Bomb the shit out of the Serbs... see we do need Nato for something, bombing serbs!
Henry Kissinger is Jewish and a Zionist, and a member of the COMMIttE of 300.
belmordok 5 days ago
the u.s navy seals fucking sucks
ddd11236 2 months ago
Mrs mamu ti jebem kisindzersku u pizdu! MRS!
sagorevach 7 months ago
USA used weak economic position of Yugoslavia to create chaos and destruction THAT is what USA is the most famous for.
NOW if you do not understand what happened in Yugoslavia or if you learned it from the NEWS Please do not post dumb Comments , Please , It will make my nervous system last longer.
aviomaster 1 year ago
simplezzzz...kissinger is a war criminal...
lordfec 1 year ago
He's like a thousand years old and he came from the Republican wing that emphasizes realpolitik, something not terribly in vogue with either Republicans or Democrats now. I don't think he has any kind of real influence on US foreign policy post-Reagan. I'd not take his words too seriously as he's not much more than just another foreign policy expert, there is abundance of them, that may talk about all kinds of stuff but usually fail to capture what the sitting administration really plans to do.
eatfastnoodle 1 year ago
WHY did you bomb Serbia dirty imperialist scum bags ... We will return you a favour in WW-III which is coming very soon ...
aviomaster 1 year ago
UNITED NOTHING
dzexon 2 years ago
"People talk about reform in Russia... I don't think we have much of an opportunity to affect domestic politics in Moscow"...
And this is basically the essence of US foreign policymakers' measure of foreign country's democracy and liberty - if we can't affect the country's policy, the regime is dictatorial and it has to reform until it serves our best interests.
It's all about the imposition of laissez-faire through shock doctrine at global level.
Lillymill 2 years ago
I fail to see what this particular video has to do with NATO wars against Serbs...even the word "Serbs" isn't mentioned even once.
Your video description does indeed explain this matter, but this video is out of place, non-related to it's description.
I believe you've put the wrong title for this video.
mickeypopa 2 years ago
Read the info to the video. He hints! He doesn't reveal anything here, but you can draw your own conclusions from what he says. Then you will understand the origin of both NATO wars against the Serbian people.
YugoCast 2 years ago
@YugoCast
I don't dispute his "hints", as you call them, and certainly, you've been most informative in your description. However, the thing that I do argue about, is the fact that when someone (that's not from Bosnia like I am) watches this, he's not going to draw a parallel to the situation in Bosnia and Serbia, no matter what you write in the description.
Only solid words coming out of his mouth will suffice for people that don't know the root of the problem, so to speak. Do you understand?
mickeypopa 2 years ago
@mickeypopa
Well, if anyone doubts that there was a crisis within NATO after the collpas of the Berlin Wall, this is ought to change their mind. In addition, here Kissinger explains why the organization is so crucial for the United States to survive. So it's no wonder how far the Americans would go to see that happen.
YugoCast 2 years ago
@mickeypopa NATO = American military occupation of Europe = selling arms to all their Satellites = Money = Empire = everything they want
How to justify a defensive pact against Communism that no longer existed? Bomb the shit out of the Serbs... see we do need Nato for something, bombing serbs!
BezCiceNemaPrice 1 year ago