Go look at Stellarium, August 3rd 1971 using the moon as the location, For the first image in the video, look roughly north west. You'll see they match.
@jcgmed: In short: since sixties we had accurate optical devices to show the stars, they only needed magnify negatives using sequence of several lens. This video is a great hoax.
@Leivinn20 You dont even know what kind of camera was used during Apollo's EVAS, as always all your arguments are based on imprecise statements, so I'll might say the hoax is only on your head. Misinformation is your way.
@jcgmed : It´s very simple: during 40 years the NASA never showed magnified images by optical devices, no matter how many times the public asked for them...these videos are hoax, they are a simple digital manipulation. Think about: pixilated stars without any optical evidences duting fourty years. Open your eyes please...the optical devices coming from sixties are still more accurate than current digital devices.
@Leivinn20 You have assumed the nonexistence for AS15-82-11091HR, and that image almost blinks in the corner of your eye.
There are tons of catalogs distributed by Nasa during and after the Apollo program finished, but of course, you will assume those catalogs doesnt exist, there is not consistent base for your arguments, you simply dont want to believe those missions were real.
@Leivinn20 All pictures used for this video are CLEARLY referred, if you cant spend a little time to go for them at Apollo Image Atlas, and face them with star charts, using the time of year and the coordinates from which those pictures were taken...your
intentions about making a mess from what should really happened if any guy from Apollo Mission's crews didnt realized of what any Apollo doubter would really say 40 years later of those missions are pretty clear, not only for me.
@Leivinn20: this video is hoax...come on!, do you want the world believes on pixelated stars?...and besides, that the astronauts never thought on take several accurate photos of the star during any trip, even they had a very sophisticated camera.
@jcgmed : come on!, Do you want convince to world the stars appeared after fourty years using digital processing?...-my answer: the optical devices coming from the sixties are more accurate.
@Leivinn20 Again, you have no checked my sources, so come on, if you dont want to dig a little more, well, its your problem, but it is a clear demonstration of basements for hoax theories, from which misinformation is the more notable of all.
@jcgmed: You are joker, or may be you´re very stupid. NASA can´t show digital evidence if before doesn´t show the physical evidence, obviously, they need optical device like microscopy apparatus .The class is finished. it´s was a free sample. By the way, I said:tThe videos are hoax, I didn´t said: the all evidence on the videos is false, it´s impossible for me to be sure about this. Bye.
Those images have clearly viewable stars at the naked eye, got it ? Naked Eye.
I've just enhanced brightness, contrast and gamma in order to make them appear clearer, but the fact is that such spots fits with a few stars as viewed from Hadley Rille's location in that time of year, July 30 - August 2, 1971, by taking into account camera's field of view, lens, and film.
@Leivinn20 Those equipments were not so sophisticated as you might think, and that leads me to realize that your research level reaches 0 in the best of cases.
Now I know you are not willing to take just a little time to compare such spots on images with a simple star chart, or check all Apollo's imagery catalog for the Apollo missions released by NASA at early 70's, or whatsoever related with your claims, in order to give a serious support to all of your statements.
@Leivinn20 Accusing without researching it's much easier so yeah, your stupidity golden lessons had reached too far, as any hoax believer.
Remember AS15-82-11091HR, you almost brayed all around, stating such picture is not available on the world wide web, but the fact is that the shot is there, a few steps away from your common sense, so anyone can realize that you do not want to believe Apollo missions were real, no matter how or what.
@jcgmed: It´s disgraceful, your science teachers were the mythbusters, and your classroom was Discovery Channel. Don´t bother me, throw away your garbage on other site.
@Leivinn20 Science is not supported by undocumented assumptions like yours, you have not provided even the tiniest CONCRETE evidence about NOTHING.
I shared all my sources and procedures at the very beginning of this video, but you keep refusing to research, over and over and over again, so I can assure you have not reviewed NOTHING of that stuff.
@Leivinn20 And yes, I have a CONCRETE evidence about your repetitive refusal to research: AS15-82-11091HR.. you have assumed that this picture remains unavailable on the world wide web...but there it is ! I told you WHERE !!
Read yourself: @jcgmed: Try to find this picture on the Internet: AS15-82-11091HR...OPEN YOUR AYES.
@jcgmed: AS15-84-11250HR image (1:33) shows erosion evidences and geologic layers, the Moon don´t has atmospheric factors, its geology is result of meteor impacts and igneous processes. You're misinforming.
@Leivinn20 Great, check the original picture, render a video with it and see what happens.
Oh, sorry, I've just remembered you have no posted videos, now I know why you see pixels after zooming-in on a picture with special brightness / contrast / gamma adjustments.
No videos and ghost pictures, remember AS15-82-11091HR, this is not a matter of faith, bud.
If you want put on test videos, follow this steps: 1) find a camera like the camera used on the Moon, after, 2) focuse it to any object on the horizon during a clear night, and then, 3) you use digital image processing for find star. It´s more probable is that you will note the exposure time don´t let you take images of stars, besides, the focal distance doesn´t let you do it neither.
@Leivinn20 you forgot the fact of being at moon's surface itself in order to match all your requirements.
Common sense in this case is supported by statistics, several spots matching with several stars in several pictures are too many coincidences in a row for randomly placed dust grains or tiny reflections.
@Leivinn20 All pictures used for this video are CLEARLY referred, if you cant spend a little time to go for them at Apollo Image Atlas, and face them with star charts, using the time of year and the coordinates from which those pictures were taken...your
intentions about making a mess from what should really happened if any guy from Apollo Mission's crews didnt realized of what any Apollo doubter would really say 40 years later of those missions are pretty clear, not only for me.
@jcgmed: Keep in mind, the stars shown on this video are pixelated. Don´t can be seen on the original image. Some one decided decided make fun of everybody. Even, it´s posible certain "stars" will appear in the long range due to damage of pictures.
@jcgmed If the stars are on the original pictures it isn`t necessary digital processing, using of magnifying glass or other kind of accurate optical device would be enough. This video is a hoax. During over 40 years NASA never showed pictures of star, however, they could have done when they feel like it. Still the optical devices have better resolution or definition than digital devices because they don´t need pixels and neither memory. The NASA defenders are making the role of stupid.
@Leivinn20@Leivinn20 Apparently you have no checked none of the sources I've included in this video, those are huge images on which no pixelation occurs.
You have demonstrated again that all your arguments are based in your incapacity to dig just a little beyond your prejudices, whereof your assumptions about the non existence for the AS15-82-11091HR picture are a good example.
This video is an intent to distract the attention on the real discussing point. The asking about photos of the stars is due to they are useful for dating and sitting of the events on the Moon. There were many opportunity for taking a lot of photos from the Orbiter when it was passing over the dark side of the Moon. If we use this video we never will know what point is dust or star.
@jcgmed: We never will know which point on the image is a star, or which one is a particle of dust. It was easier to take several photos well focused from the Orbiter, and other photos from the Moon surface for dating and locating (astronomical). It´s simple common sense.
@Raindarsus Ah. By checking color images with viewable blue points on sky, on which such points lined up with starts as viewed from Hadley Rille coordinates, from the july 30 to aug. 2 time period, to later implement blue hue shifting and brightness and contratst increment but prioritizing contrast to enhance differences with the surrounding area; and the same match criteria to b/w images
@WedidLandONtheMOON: The asking about photos of the stars is due to they are useful for dating and sitting of the events on the Moon. There were many opportunity for taking a lot of photos from the Orbiter when it was passing over the dark side of the Moon. If we use this video we never will know what point is dust or star.
@jcgmed: This video is an intent to distract the attention on the real discussing point. The asking about photos of the stars is due to they are useful for dating and sitting of the events on the Moon. There were many opportunity for taking a lot of photos from the Orbiter when it was passing over the dark side of the Moon. If we use this video we never will know what point is dust or star. Have more common sense.
@nasafaketits thought you were smart enough to realize that a camera working at moon's surface should be difficult to focuse, worst while wearing a presurized spacesuit and everything a moon landing could imply, so a...motorized camera could fix some problems.
@jcgmed : it´s issue of common sense, if someone has a camera accurate enough to take photo of stars, simply take the photos, it´s already done This video is a hoax.
Apollo 17 astronaut Gene Cernan said they had to shut the LM engine down before they faked the moon landing
Apollo 11 astronauts said they never shut the LM engine down
In 1969 Nasa did not know that the internet was coming to expose the Nasa Hoax
All NASA Fake footage was actually filmed off TV screens at Houston Mission Control for the TV coverage... No one in the media was given the raw footage
@nasafakedit Oh, I though all missions were true but not the windows from which 16mm footages were taken, as stated by some hoax theorist called Greenmagoos.
Of course all raw footages are available to whom it may concern, both kinds: the 16mm on-boards and the tv broadcasts ( also known as Complete Downlink Editions ).
the entire apollo missions were faked except for lift off and even then nasa faked the conversations with the astronauts when the rockets were screaming
@nasafakedit well, hope you understand the essence of incredibility in moon hoax theories: after the wires, fake moonscapes, studio lights and so on, quindar tones and so on, now you are claiming that the fake originals were deleted by Nasa, this is, everything was faked TWICE, read yourself:
nasafakedit (57 minutes ago) :
nasa erased the fake original footage, destroyed it, thats what they said
15th comment in this vlog, by clicking " show " in the spam row.
All 70mm scanned photographs has a 1:0060 factor between width and height, its diagonal from up-right and down-left vortex is always an excat multiple of such factor.
Such photographs were scanned in 1998 using Adobe Photoshop 3.0 under the IEC61966-2.1 color gamut, every edition procedure leaves a mark which indicates how to compile the photograph while being opened in any image viewer, and only " rsz ", this is, resize, mark is available when decompiling such photos.
God i swear, all the conspiracy theorists are virgins with no lives so they just argue on the internet all day. They dont have anything to lose because they have no life anyway :(
And still you used 1h to comment on the "stupid" video. I consider it having more of an answer to stupid comments about "not landing on the moon". Good vid 5*
you will find specs in any black surface that you apply high contrast. if those are real stars, then its time to name them, name the constellations and confirm a true and accurate depiction of those stars.
Orion? how convenient. LOL. do some research about Orion.
now let's map Orion and ALL the other constellations that are present. find the day, month, year the photos were taken, as well as the location on the moon, the direction of the camera, and let's see if the stars are accurate, or if they are just another backdrop.
Nope. That is not Orion's belt in AS14-66-9232HR. First, Orion was well below the lunar horizon at the Apollo 14 landing site. In fact, all stars "visible" in the photo above the horizon are pinholes in the film emulsion caused by lunar dust getting embedded into the film as the film was wound onto the takeup spool inside the lunar Hasselblad camera. This also is why the "stars" all appear blue since the dust punctured the blue film layer.
Well, I must admit that regolith is too fine to make a mess in a camera.
There are too many coincidences in a row, just by having 3 dust points in a film fitting with Alnitak, Alnilam and Mintaka coordinates and angles between them and respect the available Earth's phase ( waning crescent ) at such time ( feb 5, 1971 ).
The lunar dust on a near microscopic level is as sharp as glass. Sorry, but if you try to overlay the photo atop a photo of Orion's belt, you will find that Alnilam is displaced (aside from being too bright). And the image scale isn't correct. The 60mm Biogon lens has an exact focal length of 61.1mm. The reseau ticks are spaced exactly 20mm apart. Do the math. Use a program called Celestia to put you on the moon at the landing site on Feb 5, 1971 and see what constellations were visible.
By placing the a14's near-to-Fra Mauro landing site coordinates ( -3.6733 N, -17.4653 E ) in Celestia, and later, by turning the view 180 degrees on the E coordinate to the antipod in order to have the stars positions respect to the zenith on A13's landing site, and comparing such postion with earth's phase ( for which I used AS14-64-9189 to AS14-64-9197 )...
well, there's a slight deviation on the belt, but, well, Sheppard and Mitchell were not standing in perfect horizontal table to match every degree.
I've found another interesting views on the a14's stuff, I'm comparing that with Celestia and another astronomic stuff, I'll let you know more sooner than later my results...i meant: only a frame is not enuff evidence, if we can catch more stars, well, the probabilities becomes almost impossible for coincidences.
He he. I figured that you probably already have used Celestia to find out which constellations were visible above the lunar horizon, and their position angle and orientation.
I have worked up a simple spreadsheet which allows you to calculate position angles between any two points in any Apollo image with a reseau plate. I need to further enhance the spreadsheet in order to take into account any slight image rotation and to allow computation of precise angles between any two image points. :-)
I've heard about some pictures from lunar surface where the brightest stars were visible, but you pushed the envelope further and found the best images for us.
Go look at Stellarium, August 3rd 1971 using the moon as the location, For the first image in the video, look roughly north west. You'll see they match.
LizardOverlord 11 months ago
Comment removed
LizardOverlord 11 months ago
So how do we know these are actual stars?
tehbertl 11 months ago
@MetapshicLover Indeed. We've witnessed a brilliant demostration this day.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed: In short: since sixties we had accurate optical devices to show the stars, they only needed magnify negatives using sequence of several lens. This video is a great hoax.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 You dont even know what kind of camera was used during Apollo's EVAS, as always all your arguments are based on imprecise statements, so I'll might say the hoax is only on your head. Misinformation is your way.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed : It´s very simple: during 40 years the NASA never showed magnified images by optical devices, no matter how many times the public asked for them...these videos are hoax, they are a simple digital manipulation. Think about: pixilated stars without any optical evidences duting fourty years. Open your eyes please...the optical devices coming from sixties are still more accurate than current digital devices.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 You have assumed the nonexistence for AS15-82-11091HR, and that image almost blinks in the corner of your eye.
There are tons of catalogs distributed by Nasa during and after the Apollo program finished, but of course, you will assume those catalogs doesnt exist, there is not consistent base for your arguments, you simply dont want to believe those missions were real.
jcgmed 1 year ago
it´s issue of common sense, if someone has a camera accurate enough to take photo of stars, simply take the photos, it´s already done.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 All pictures used for this video are CLEARLY referred, if you cant spend a little time to go for them at Apollo Image Atlas, and face them with star charts, using the time of year and the coordinates from which those pictures were taken...your
intentions about making a mess from what should really happened if any guy from Apollo Mission's crews didnt realized of what any Apollo doubter would really say 40 years later of those missions are pretty clear, not only for me.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@Leivinn20: this video is hoax...come on!, do you want the world believes on pixelated stars?...and besides, that the astronauts never thought on take several accurate photos of the star during any trip, even they had a very sophisticated camera.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 very sophisticated, lol, another golden thought of yours, keep on with your amazing misinformation survey.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed : come on!, Do you want convince to world the stars appeared after fourty years using digital processing?...-my answer: the optical devices coming from the sixties are more accurate.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 Again, you have no checked my sources, so come on, if you dont want to dig a little more, well, its your problem, but it is a clear demonstration of basements for hoax theories, from which misinformation is the more notable of all.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed : I mean:...Think about: pixilated stars without any optical evidences DURING fourty years...
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 yep it's you, I know.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed: You are joker, or may be you´re very stupid. NASA can´t show digital evidence if before doesn´t show the physical evidence, obviously, they need optical device like microscopy apparatus .The class is finished. it´s was a free sample. By the way, I said:tThe videos are hoax, I didn´t said: the all evidence on the videos is false, it´s impossible for me to be sure about this. Bye.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 Thought you are the joker.
Those images have clearly viewable stars at the naked eye, got it ? Naked Eye.
I've just enhanced brightness, contrast and gamma in order to make them appear clearer, but the fact is that such spots fits with a few stars as viewed from Hadley Rille's location in that time of year, July 30 - August 2, 1971, by taking into account camera's field of view, lens, and film.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 Those equipments were not so sophisticated as you might think, and that leads me to realize that your research level reaches 0 in the best of cases.
Now I know you are not willing to take just a little time to compare such spots on images with a simple star chart, or check all Apollo's imagery catalog for the Apollo missions released by NASA at early 70's, or whatsoever related with your claims, in order to give a serious support to all of your statements.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 Accusing without researching it's much easier so yeah, your stupidity golden lessons had reached too far, as any hoax believer.
Remember AS15-82-11091HR, you almost brayed all around, stating such picture is not available on the world wide web, but the fact is that the shot is there, a few steps away from your common sense, so anyone can realize that you do not want to believe Apollo missions were real, no matter how or what.
Open your eyes.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed: It´s disgraceful, your science teachers were the mythbusters, and your classroom was Discovery Channel. Don´t bother me, throw away your garbage on other site.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 Science is not supported by undocumented assumptions like yours, you have not provided even the tiniest CONCRETE evidence about NOTHING.
I shared all my sources and procedures at the very beginning of this video, but you keep refusing to research, over and over and over again, so I can assure you have not reviewed NOTHING of that stuff.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 And yes, I have a CONCRETE evidence about your repetitive refusal to research: AS15-82-11091HR.. you have assumed that this picture remains unavailable on the world wide web...but there it is ! I told you WHERE !!
Read yourself: @jcgmed: Try to find this picture on the Internet: AS15-82-11091HR...OPEN YOUR AYES.
OPEN YOUR EYES !!
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed: AS15-84-11250HR image (1:33) shows erosion evidences and geologic layers, the Moon don´t has atmospheric factors, its geology is result of meteor impacts and igneous processes. You're misinforming.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 Great, check the original picture, render a video with it and see what happens.
Oh, sorry, I've just remembered you have no posted videos, now I know why you see pixels after zooming-in on a picture with special brightness / contrast / gamma adjustments.
No videos and ghost pictures, remember AS15-82-11091HR, this is not a matter of faith, bud.
Open your eyes.
jcgmed 1 year ago 4
If you want put on test videos, follow this steps: 1) find a camera like the camera used on the Moon, after, 2) focuse it to any object on the horizon during a clear night, and then, 3) you use digital image processing for find star. It´s more probable is that you will note the exposure time don´t let you take images of stars, besides, the focal distance doesn´t let you do it neither.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 you forgot the fact of being at moon's surface itself in order to match all your requirements.
Common sense in this case is supported by statistics, several spots matching with several stars in several pictures are too many coincidences in a row for randomly placed dust grains or tiny reflections.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed: Try to find this picture on the Internet: AS15-82-11091HR...OPEN YOUR AYES.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 Lol, it's a 2340px × 2355px picture from Apollo 15's SS magazine.
Just google Apollo Image Gallery, use 11091 as search topic at there it is.
Btw, thanks for sharing your chronical trends toward misinformation. Hold the line !
Open your eyes.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 All pictures used for this video are CLEARLY referred, if you cant spend a little time to go for them at Apollo Image Atlas, and face them with star charts, using the time of year and the coordinates from which those pictures were taken...your
intentions about making a mess from what should really happened if any guy from Apollo Mission's crews didnt realized of what any Apollo doubter would really say 40 years later of those missions are pretty clear, not only for me.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed: Keep in mind, the stars shown on this video are pixelated. Don´t can be seen on the original image. Some one decided decided make fun of everybody. Even, it´s posible certain "stars" will appear in the long range due to damage of pictures.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 reading star charts is boooring, I know.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed If the stars are on the original pictures it isn`t necessary digital processing, using of magnifying glass or other kind of accurate optical device would be enough. This video is a hoax. During over 40 years NASA never showed pictures of star, however, they could have done when they feel like it. Still the optical devices have better resolution or definition than digital devices because they don´t need pixels and neither memory. The NASA defenders are making the role of stupid.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 @Leivinn20 Apparently you have no checked none of the sources I've included in this video, those are huge images on which no pixelation occurs.
You have demonstrated again that all your arguments are based in your incapacity to dig just a little beyond your prejudices, whereof your assumptions about the non existence for the AS15-82-11091HR picture are a good example.
jcgmed 1 year ago
This video is an intent to distract the attention on the real discussing point. The asking about photos of the stars is due to they are useful for dating and sitting of the events on the Moon. There were many opportunity for taking a lot of photos from the Orbiter when it was passing over the dark side of the Moon. If we use this video we never will know what point is dust or star.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 So you assume I never did comparisons with star charts before posting this.
Thanks for missing the explanation on the beginning, and for asking before judging, thats the best way to classify distractions without facing them !
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed: We never will know which point on the image is a star, or which one is a particle of dust. It was easier to take several photos well focused from the Orbiter, and other photos from the Moon surface for dating and locating (astronomical). It´s simple common sense.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
I love the music on your video. Just to know, what is the process you used to do this?
Raindarsus 1 year ago
@Raindarsus Hi there. Do you mean music ? I didnt, It's from Liquid Tension, I have an original composition on another from my vids. Cheers.
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed Nah I meant for the stars. How did you manage to bring them out?
Raindarsus 1 year ago
@Raindarsus Ah. By checking color images with viewable blue points on sky, on which such points lined up with starts as viewed from Hadley Rille coordinates, from the july 30 to aug. 2 time period, to later implement blue hue shifting and brightness and contratst increment but prioritizing contrast to enhance differences with the surrounding area; and the same match criteria to b/w images
omitting the hue shift.
jcgmed 1 year ago
Another Video showing Proof Of the Moon Landing.
WedidLandONtheMOON 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WedidLandONtheMOON: The asking about photos of the stars is due to they are useful for dating and sitting of the events on the Moon. There were many opportunity for taking a lot of photos from the Orbiter when it was passing over the dark side of the Moon. If we use this video we never will know what point is dust or star.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
nasa is fake fake fake u cant take fotos withhout a vyewfinder is unpossible
nasafaketits 1 year ago
@nasafaketits who needs a viewfinder while using a lens full of quadrants ?
jcgmed 1 year ago
@jcgmed stop using big words to fool me monkeyboy
shill whores use cameras without vyewfynders
nasafaketits 1 year ago
@nasafaketits sorry, your assumptions are evidence of nothing. Learn to read star charts, be smarter.
jcgmed 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jcgmed: This video is an intent to distract the attention on the real discussing point. The asking about photos of the stars is due to they are useful for dating and sitting of the events on the Moon. There were many opportunity for taking a lot of photos from the Orbiter when it was passing over the dark side of the Moon. If we use this video we never will know what point is dust or star. Have more common sense.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@nasafaketits thought you were smart enough to realize that a camera working at moon's surface should be difficult to focuse, worst while wearing a presurized spacesuit and everything a moon landing could imply, so a...motorized camera could fix some problems.
Btw, it had viewfinder too.
jcgmed 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jcgmed : it´s issue of common sense, if someone has a camera accurate enough to take photo of stars, simply take the photos, it´s already done This video is a hoax.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
Reading star charts is boooring, I know.
jcgmed 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOAX OF THE CENTURY
Nasa are Liars
Nasa Astronauts are Traitors
Apollo 17 astronaut Gene Cernan said they had to shut the LM engine down before they faked the moon landing
Apollo 11 astronauts said they never shut the LM engine down
In 1969 Nasa did not know that the internet was coming to expose the Nasa Hoax
All NASA Fake footage was actually filmed off TV screens at Houston Mission Control for the TV coverage... No one in the media was given the raw footage
nasafakedit 2 years ago
@nasafakedit Oh, I though all missions were true but not the windows from which 16mm footages were taken, as stated by some hoax theorist called Greenmagoos.
Of course all raw footages are available to whom it may concern, both kinds: the 16mm on-boards and the tv broadcasts ( also known as Complete Downlink Editions ).
jcgmed 2 years ago
the entire apollo missions were faked except for lift off and even then nasa faked the conversations with the astronauts when the rockets were screaming
nasafakedit 2 years ago
@nasafakedit so a rocket screaming in Cape Kennedy can be heard from Houston, nice.
jcgmed 2 years ago
lmao are you for real?
nasa pretended to communicate with the astronauts during lift off
what a crock of shit
nasafakedit 2 years ago
@nasafakedit so what happened after lift offs ?
jcgmed 2 years ago
@jcgmed
dude don't act dumb
during lift off nasa pretended to be communicating with the astronauts when the rocket engines were screaming
after lift off the rocket went a few hundred miles up then dumped them in the sea
nasafakedit 2 years ago
@nasafakedit how much time after liftoffs ?
jcgmed 2 years ago
dude i wasn't there, were you?
come on and act you age
nasafakedit 2 years ago
@nasafakedit well, if you are claiming that you must have some accurate proofs...
jcgmed 2 years ago
@jcgmed like your TV proof monkey kid?
nasafakedit 2 years ago
@nasafakedit nope, like the one you must have.
jcgmed 2 years ago
@nasafakedit well, hope you understand the essence of incredibility in moon hoax theories: after the wires, fake moonscapes, studio lights and so on, quindar tones and so on, now you are claiming that the fake originals were deleted by Nasa, this is, everything was faked TWICE, read yourself:
nasafakedit (57 minutes ago) :
nasa erased the fake original footage, destroyed it, thats what they said
15th comment in this vlog, by clicking " show " in the spam row.
Nice to meet you.
jcgmed 2 years ago
nasa erased the fake original footage, destroyed it, thats what they said
nasafakedit 2 years ago
@nasafakedit so Nasa faked not one but twice everything ?
jcgmed 2 years ago
All 70mm scanned photographs has a 1:0060 factor between width and height, its diagonal from up-right and down-left vortex is always an excat multiple of such factor.
Such photographs were scanned in 1998 using Adobe Photoshop 3.0 under the IEC61966-2.1 color gamut, every edition procedure leaves a mark which indicates how to compile the photograph while being opened in any image viewer, and only " rsz ", this is, resize, mark is available when decompiling such photos.
jcgmed 2 years ago
Sure, no prob.
Just google this: as15-82-11091, check the first result, and you'll be on the Apollo Image Atlas, HR versions included.
Best regards.
jcgmed 2 years ago
God i swear, all the conspiracy theorists are virgins with no lives so they just argue on the internet all day. They dont have anything to lose because they have no life anyway :(
TonyRomoFan4EVER 2 years ago 7
No doubt.
jcgmed 2 years ago
And still you used 1h to comment on the "stupid" video. I consider it having more of an answer to stupid comments about "not landing on the moon". Good vid 5*
11DNA11 2 years ago
Juan Camilo, tks.
Ok, you asked for it, tks for showing how rational hoaxies can be.
Bye.
jcgmed 2 years ago
Only scientific, good-terms comments allowed.
One more, and you'll be blocked.
jcgmed 2 years ago
you will find specs in any black surface that you apply high contrast. if those are real stars, then its time to name them, name the constellations and confirm a true and accurate depiction of those stars.
wearechangela 2 years ago
Oh, I was waiting for this.
Orion, not only, appears a lot here. Do you want all the details or try it by yourself ?
jcgmed 2 years ago
Orion? how convenient. LOL. do some research about Orion.
now let's map Orion and ALL the other constellations that are present. find the day, month, year the photos were taken, as well as the location on the moon, the direction of the camera, and let's see if the stars are accurate, or if they are just another backdrop.
peace
wearechangela 2 years ago
Man, source names included.
Do it, and post it.
jcgmed 2 years ago
Curse, Orion constellation, have you seen its belt in as14-66-9232HR ?
jcgmed 2 years ago
Nope. That is not Orion's belt in AS14-66-9232HR. First, Orion was well below the lunar horizon at the Apollo 14 landing site. In fact, all stars "visible" in the photo above the horizon are pinholes in the film emulsion caused by lunar dust getting embedded into the film as the film was wound onto the takeup spool inside the lunar Hasselblad camera. This also is why the "stars" all appear blue since the dust punctured the blue film layer.
GoneToPlaid 2 years ago
Well, I must admit that regolith is too fine to make a mess in a camera.
There are too many coincidences in a row, just by having 3 dust points in a film fitting with Alnitak, Alnilam and Mintaka coordinates and angles between them and respect the available Earth's phase ( waning crescent ) at such time ( feb 5, 1971 ).
Best regards.
jcgmed 2 years ago
The lunar dust on a near microscopic level is as sharp as glass. Sorry, but if you try to overlay the photo atop a photo of Orion's belt, you will find that Alnilam is displaced (aside from being too bright). And the image scale isn't correct. The 60mm Biogon lens has an exact focal length of 61.1mm. The reseau ticks are spaced exactly 20mm apart. Do the math. Use a program called Celestia to put you on the moon at the landing site on Feb 5, 1971 and see what constellations were visible.
GoneToPlaid 2 years ago
Yup, I've done that research some weeks ago.
By placing the a14's near-to-Fra Mauro landing site coordinates ( -3.6733 N, -17.4653 E ) in Celestia, and later, by turning the view 180 degrees on the E coordinate to the antipod in order to have the stars positions respect to the zenith on A13's landing site, and comparing such postion with earth's phase ( for which I used AS14-64-9189 to AS14-64-9197 )...
jcgmed 2 years ago
well, there's a slight deviation on the belt, but, well, Sheppard and Mitchell were not standing in perfect horizontal table to match every degree.
I've found another interesting views on the a14's stuff, I'm comparing that with Celestia and another astronomic stuff, I'll let you know more sooner than later my results...i meant: only a frame is not enuff evidence, if we can catch more stars, well, the probabilities becomes almost impossible for coincidences.
Best regards.
jcgmed 2 years ago
He he. I figured that you probably already have used Celestia to find out which constellations were visible above the lunar horizon, and their position angle and orientation.
I have worked up a simple spreadsheet which allows you to calculate position angles between any two points in any Apollo image with a reseau plate. I need to further enhance the spreadsheet in order to take into account any slight image rotation and to allow computation of precise angles between any two image points. :-)
GoneToPlaid 2 years ago
Oh zoiks Scoob, we lost all the original Nasa Moon video tapes
immovable1 2 years ago
And thousands of people didn't recorded our open signal broadcast.
jcgmed 2 years ago
Good job jc!
I've heard about some pictures from lunar surface where the brightest stars were visible, but you pushed the envelope further and found the best images for us.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
Tks BH.
I realized that hoaxies are very, very lazy people.
jcgmed 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is lame. my lil sister could do better photo shop then that.
cornholio777 2 years ago
Source names included.
jcgmed 2 years ago