Added: 4 years ago
From: keuriseudo
Views: 90,048
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,182)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I like how Muslims think that the western society needs more fixing up than their society. Always talking about the women, as if they're possessions and as though human skin is something foreign and should be vilified. This just further proves their prehistoric mindset as well as the absence of any self control when it comes to women and sex.

  • Soldiers of allah will regret coming near me

  • "some of us just goes one God further"

    It's funny, because even religious people is almost as atheist as a non-believer. How many Gods are there? Thousands? And religious people only believes in one of them among thousands, atheist also do not believe in the thousands of Gods, they just include that last one too.

  • That man was raised in a secular family, but grew up to become a complete shithead. He is sexist, intolerant, bigoted, and generally hateful. I have to conclude that he is willingly ignorant. I will never understand the appeal of adopting such a fucked-up belief system becoming that kind of person.

  • Absolute equality is a foolish thought. Worth is not determined by race or sex, but by your actions. I refuse to see myself as equal to the pieces of shit like that Muslim or anybody who has the nerve to spew bullshit like that out.

  • lol at the jew-turned-muslim. What a coward! "Oh they hate Jews here? Allah is cool i'm a muslim now!" Sounds like a real stern believer. And saying you hate Atheists because they dont care if people fornicate in the street? How can you possibly assert that when there are plenty of atheists who care about things like that, especially when they're completely unrelated to religious such as the example he gave... Dumb bastard.

  • Wait a minute? We are all teapot agnostics, but we are practicing athiests? This is contradictory!

  • @coach8401 No, he said we are all teapot atheists but practicing agnostics.

  • @shrikechan No listen carefully starting at 6:18. "Maybe we have to be technically and strictly agnostic, but in practice we are all teapot athiests." This is completely contradictory to saying you are an athiest because there is no evidence. This go's contrary to that, leaving you at the point where there might or might not be a God.

  • @coach8401 you've missed the point...

    

  • @yigwhargoul1 Which is?

  • @coach8401 The point is that an Atheist does not believe in God. Quite simply; nothing more complicated than that. And the reason we're atheists is because there is no evidence for God. 0+0=0, no? If there's no evidence, why believe something's there?

    Technically, however, we can't prove - difinitively - that there is no God, so we're of course open to the possibility. God might be, God might not be. Nobody knows.

    Atheists, however, have no reason to believe that there is a God. So they don't.

  • @SeedsOfHatred Faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see Hebrews 11:1. As for your answer, not being able to prove that there is not a God, at best you are left with agnosticism, not athiesm, but you choose to say, there is no God, final answer! As for being open, what proof, would you as an athiest accept to believe that the Bible is correct and that Jesus Christ was the Son of God? I looking for a simple answer to what evidence you would accept.

  • @coach8401 Again, you've entirely missed the point. As Dawkins said in the video, we're all "technically and strictly Agnostic". This is true, and you are correct; it's what we're left with without evidence either way. But "Atheism" is - quite simply - a lack of belief that God exists. You can't prove fairies don't exist, but you don't believe in them, do you? The same with Santa or the Easter Bunny. That lack of belief is Atheism.

    It's really quite simple.

  • @SeedsOfHatred I understand, but you see you're only taking it so far! You only accept the saying that there is no proof for it, but you don't accept the proof that there is not proof against it. As for fairies, easter bunny, santa, there is a difference. These imaginary creatures are listed in fairy tales as Jesus and God are listed in a historical document accepted by historians. But just because you can't prove something, doesn't mean you can't rationally accept the thing described.

  • @coach8401 (Part 2) So no, Atheism is not "There is no God, final answer!" That would be just as absurd as Theism.

    As for what proof I would require, I honestly don't know. I'd say it would take a personal religious experience, but being a graduated student of psychology, I'm not sure I'd put much trust in that experience. So again, I don't know. Considering the Biblical myths that science has discredited, probably nothing.

    But Christianity isn't the only option, now is it?

  • @SeedsOfHatred I too just got done taking a psychological class studying criminals. So your answer is basically that you wouldn't give it a shot what so ever? So would you accept a psychological research of the top rehabilitations, historical data, or archaelogical data? See this is science and the bible get mixed up. Do you think the bible is there to tell us scientific facts and science to tell us morality and spiritual growth to God?

  • @SeedsOfHatred As for Christianity only? Of course! I was brought up as a Christian, but later became an agnostic when I stopped going to church, didn't read the bible, and just ignored God, which I became an agnostic accepting the evolutionary theory. Later I spoke with my brother who told me to check into it. So I not only checked into Chistianity, but I studied and checked out Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Greek mythology, JW's, LDS's, Catholicism, and Christianity.

  • @SeedsOfHatred So as I studied, I noticed there is a difference between faith and religion. I too am against religion. The difference is in Christianity, we followed the bible teachings only as all religions contained 1 thing, man made laws which contain rules, traditions, etc... which were not bible based, and having others tell others what to do. I can go more into it, but I'll end up writing a book, so if you have any questions to my belief, feel free to ask?

  • "atheists don't care if people fornicate in the street"? What an asshole. You know what? I might as well act the way his moronic ass thinks atheists act. I wish that he could have said that to my face so I could could have punched him in his. Fucking douchebag.

  • "We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in ... some of us just go one god further."

  • It's in the bible...FREE WILL.NO ONE "EVER" will prove that God exists no even in billion of years, if someone would prove that God exists, free will wouldn't make sense anymore, God gave us the chance to do what we want here, we pay the consequences later, only way to prove that God exists is through faith...

  • Atheism does not exclude morality

  • Men assert their power with physical prowess and/or control others by wealth, status, and authority. Women can assert their power through sex appeal and will dress as provocatively as the norms of society permit as this maximizes their power over others. Muslims restrict/control female dress because life is about who has power and control of scarce resources (including women) in the harsh Muslim world. Women who dress freely take power and control for themselves. Rape is a power thing too.

  • You can't reason with extreme religious zealots of any belief system...They are insane.

  • I could have argued that Muslim guy much better than Dawkins... I would have agreed with him about Israel's illegal actions, disagreed with him about Atheists not having any morals. I would have handled that confused tool.

  • @donluchitti I think he would have continued blathering on about incoherent nonsense. It's impossible to reason with people who are so blinded by faith that they will justify the killing of thousands of people as the "will of god/allah/yahweh". He spoke of having morality, but he obviously knows nothing.

  • Just watch all the vile Muslims try to defend this Jewish/Islamic /american/whatever

    He is an idiot. He was born an idiot. He will remain an idiot....

  • Thanks for uploading all of these!!

  • Not sure if this is the same documentary where Stephen Hawkin smirks when he asks Dawkins " Why are you obsessed by God?".... FANTASTIC MOMENT :-)

  • I want to ride around London sitting on the handlebars of Professor Dawkins' bicycle. :3 That would be a dream come true.

  • The muslims anger towards how women dress in the west is misplaced. Really, what he is supporting is sexual inequality. In reality, in the natural world, there would be nothing wrong with a women, or anyone, being stark naked in public. It is only cultural customs and differences that makes the issue so heated, so explicit. It all comes down to where decency and extreme compensation for said decency takes place. We all do not share the same opinion on decency, hence cultural dissonance.

  • i believe in aphrodite haha

  • I do mind myself when women walk about topless, because that would be indecent according to the way we've been raised. But these people are ofcourse on a whole other level.

  • Being a woman, and growing up in a world where I was never suppressed or controlled... it's scary to think how these men over there treat it like it's okay to control "their women". Makes me shudder.

  • Why do we allow our women to dress like whores? Sure, the solution to all the worlds problems is to oppress all women because men should be able to do whatever they want while women need to be controlled. How can anybody really believe this nonsense? Debasing or minimizing the value of certain people does NOT help anybody. This person has more clearly demonstrated the evils of religion than any non-believer ever could.

  • Never fall in logical discussion with religious people because they are suffering from logical mental disorder caused by brainwashing and lack of knowledge, thats why they

    kill in the name of GOD.

  • the muslim guy is a total hypocrite.we atheists care about alot of things we are against child abuse we are offend when people sat atheists are nazis or pedophiles, i'm an atheist i donate money to poor houses i have a jewish girlfriend and i'm pround to have her as my love of my life. we don't fly planes into buildings unlike your religion. we don't want atheists to take over the world. and we are among the most peaceful and gental people out there.

  • I wonder what the religions/people said of the invading muslims in the 400-600's CE who took over and exterminated them from their lands? Or are we going to play the relativist game again.

  • the way that guy talks about women as though they're objects, he makes me sick. it's so wrong. both sexes, and all races, are equal

  • I was bothered by many things the Muslim guy said but perhaps the thing that bothered me most was him saying "your woman" he thinks of them as possesions. This kind of thinking is wrong and just calliing it a religious belief does not change that.

  • @baxtersave96 Absolutely agree. That was my same impression as well.

  • @baxtersave96 yes,a and when hes speaking like that all of the western women dress like whores, is a bit dumb. All the women i know are decent women. Of course its up to his definition on what it is to dress like a whore.

  • @FuBarracuda but by 'dressing like whores' he means anything short of 10 blankets covering us with only our eyes poking out. I'm happy to have been born on Canadian soil because if I was over there i would have been stoned to death at the age of 5. I am an outspoken, loud mouthed woman that asks questions and fights for all human rights. just like my mama :)

  • @BlissfulPeacock thats what im talking about.

  • Those that hold God responsible for all of the good in the world and non of the bad sound like a battered wife making excuses for their abusive husband.To say God is the most powerful being in the world but is not responsible for any of the bad is like giving the coach of a winning team all the credit for the success but if that team went 0-16 you would put none of the blame on him.Can't you see the incosistency in that thought process? This is just one of the many things that bother me

  • The Bible is the mark of the Beast and written by beast offspring. These people who call themselves jews, the decedants of Abraham are the ones who wrote this book...their history, their agenda for total control over the masses.

  • Dawkins is very good at showing us exactly why religion in general ought to be tripped over, be held down, and ultimately have its throat cut before it's all too late. Let reason, logic and science take the lead within education and understanding. Let common sense and compassion be the source of morals.

    If you believe your morals come from "God", you ought to be locked up in an insane asylum. You're demented. No way around it.

  • Comment removed

  • I don't care if it rains or freezes! 'Long as I got my plastic jeezus!

  • It's funny that he isn't attacking Scientology - atheists just want to be "different." If the religious sector was atheist, atheists would be religious!

  • Comparing God to a tea pot is foolish at best. God is not an object that can be studied by science, God is an immaterial conscious being, so He can decide who He allows to know Him. I was a non-believer who kept looking and found the secrets of the universe. Dawkins stopped his quest when he was an adolescent and closed his mind. Someone who doesn't know God shouldn't have anything to say about the subject. Therefore his views can't be considered expert by any means. He should stick to science.

  • @dejesusluisx The point of the teapot analogy is not to compare god to a teapot, it is to demonstrate a supposition about the existence of an object or entity for which we have no tangible evidence, yet could conceivably believe in. In the case of a celestial teapot orbiting the sun, to believe such a thing exists seems illogical, even absurd. Atheists (and many agnostics) find belief in a god to be similarly illogical.

    You claim to have knowledge of god. My question to you is simply "how?"

  • @disappearingone11 ""supposition about the existence of an object or entity for which we have no tangible evidence"" an object and an entity (or conscious being) is not the same thing, is a bad analogy to compare one to the other. An object don't have free will so you can study it at will. Conscious being can't be studied without his consent. Is that so hard to grasp? Finding the existence of God as illogical as the existence of a celestial tea pot is an offense to the concept of logic.

  • @dejesusluisx All right, let's alter the analogy: replace the teapot with a conscious being. We can also move him around, placing no resitrictions on his movements. Having done so, if this being is still unobservable, along with any effects he may have, then what has changed? We can still believe in the being's existence, and we can still believe he affects us--perhaps the entire universe, but we still lack evidence. The analogy holds: its not dependent on the subject being conscious or not.

  • @disappearingone11 ""The analogy holds: its not dependent on the subject being conscious or not."" Fine, let me put you in an scenario. Imagine you meet a tribe isolated from civilization, without any gadget with you, how can you explain to them the existence of microwaves? or TV transmission? or radio?. They can only understand it if you give them a receiver and explain how to use it, right? Same with God. The receiver is our consciousness. The tuning is done by living in grace.

  • @disappearingone11 No one would ever prove to you empirically that God exists, and if I were you, I wouldn't ask for it either, because if it ever happen, it will be all over for the world as we know it. I was revealed a great secret on how all the universe came to be, but that also explained away God. I felt a weight in my shoulders because no one would believe me and I would be contributing to non-belief. Then, after praying for enlightenment I was given the passage 1Cor 1:21.Then I understood

  • @disappearingone11 ""You claim to have knowledge of god. My question to you is simply "how?""' The only way you can truly have real knowledge of God, by His divine revelation that can only come through being in His same wavelength.

  • @dejesusluisx You must first explain what this wavelength is: what is it, where is it, how does a person come to be on it, etc. Then, you have to explain divine relevation in the same way. I ask this in all seriousness because if such knowledge exists and is attainable by human beings, I would be very interested in knowing it, as I imagine most non-believers would. However, god's wavelength and divine revelation are abstract subjects which I cannot comprehend without further explanation.

  • @disappearingone11 God is energy. To be in tune with energy, you need to be in the same wavelength. The same with God, you need to be in His wavelength to know Him. Buddhists call it Nirvana or Enlightenment, Hindus call that moksha, Islam calls it Taubah and Christians call it living in Grace. There's only one divine consciousness with many names and dogmas, but just one reality. Is everywhere. The divine revelation is the outcome your your connection, it is simple if you're simple minded or...

  • @dejesusluisx God is not energy. He's not a spectral essence. Not a physical being. He's the same as the picture of the smiling goldfish in the childrens book, and he's the very same as the colours and things you see taking LSD or Ecstacy. God is the same as the pencil to colour the colourless landscape inside a colouring book. He's your imagination, he's an hallucination and he's the filler of the holes and gaps. God is not real.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""God is not real."" Do you have evidence for this affirmation? If not, you believe this from your own faith. That means atheism is your faith, your religion. Why changing one religion for another? As a result, all the assertions in your previous post apply similarly to your atheist delusions.

  • @dejesusluisx Yes, i do.. In the bible it states that "God is perfect". A perfect being would be a being with an infinite mind and body. A perfect being does not have feelings, because it's a weakness. That's a fact. The bible is said to be the word of god. The bible contradicts itself constantly. And God hates gays, yet he's perfect. Makes no sense. And also if he was perfect he didn't have had to rest on the seventh day nor did he have to create it in 6 days because he's perfect! [cont]

  • @MrCombineGuy "A perfect being does not have feelings, because it's a weakness" Love isn't a weakness, neither is kindness and mercy. The Bible isn't the word of God, is the inspired word of God written by many men over many centuries. In order to take out the message embedded in that inspiration, the Bible needs to be interpreted, not read literally. God doesn't hate, God rejects sin, precisely because He is perfect. God loves everyone, including gays, but sinful behaviors separate man from God

  • @MrCombineGuy All your examples are rejection of man made dogmas, you haven't presented any argument that disproves God's existence.

  • @dejesusluisx .. Hey. Let's reverse the situation here. Prove God! Go ahead.

  • @dejesusluisx (God) Oh and btw. How can you say that Gods time is not our time when the bible states that in 6 days and the bible is the WORD OF GOD? And since no one was there to count it, he had to have taken all of that time. And what about the seventh day, the sabbath. He rested. A god doesn't need to rest.. And why would he spread all of these barbaric thoughts about women, blacks and gays when they are his own creations. Why create a being only to banish them to hell right from the start!

  • @MrCombineGuy ""How can you say that Gods time is not our time"" 2Peter 3:8 ""with the Lord one day is like a thousand years and a thousand years like one day"" this means time has no meaning to God. First it could have been 6 days or 6 X 10^12 days, doesn't matter or could had been 6 days from God's perspective, not from ours, doesn't matter either. Second, the Bible isn't the word of God, is the inspired word from God, which means the Bible can't be understood literally. cont.

  • @dejesusluisx You do realise that the "Thousand is one day" wasn't there in the beginning. I can't take that seriously. And you're lieing. It's the word of God! It says so literally in the bible.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""I can't take that seriously"" You are closing you mind, the evidence is there, you just don't want to admit it because you're ashamed to look at God in the eye and say "God I'm sorry".

  • @dejesusluisx Oh... And one more thing. I was talking about the energy that was outside the universe ofcourse. Not the way the universe was created. Because that's obviously the BB, right?

  • @MrCombineGuy The consensus is the BB created the universe as we know it today, there are many theories as how the BB started, but no alternative to the BB. In fact the BB theory perfectly match the Genesis creation story, of course, metaphorically. That is why all intelligent religious scholars are in agreement with it, only narrow minded fundamentalists reject it.

  • @MrCombineGuy Your problem isn't with God, is with man made dogmas create in our desire to understand God. You are confused because you try to solve all problems at the same time. You need to solve one problem at a time. Solve the first one and then we can move to the others. Could an immaterial conscious being, or a form of conscious energy, created the universe? Is there a possibility for that? yes/no? If not, why not.

  • @dejesusluisx Ugh.. You make no sense. I didn't create the universe, and i'm not a scholar trying to solve every question. I'm sitting at home arguing with a retard. You have the wrong guy i tells ya! The wrong guy! And my problem is with idiots and the imaginary God. It's hurting our species.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""i'm not a scholar trying to solve every question."" you just need to solve the one question I proposed. Could an immaterial conscious being, or a form of conscious energy, created the universe? Is there a possibility for that? yes/no? If not, why not.

  • @dejesusluisx We don't know that. I'm sorry. But in all honesty i can't answer that question.. As for your theory for God. If you honestly wanna say that God was behind all of this, i don't think i can disprove you for now. But i don't believe it. But i don't believe that means just because it can be taken as a metaphor it means God exists because it's similar.. And i'm not closing my mind. I'm asking you to prove God for me. And if it seems valid i'll back down. And i don't fear God, honestly.

  • @MrCombineGuy "We don't know that" We have more than enough evidence to say a conscious energy is the best explanation to date for the origin of the universe, but admitting it seems to be the real problem. Goat herders living 3,000 yrs ago didn't know one thing about energy, and yet they gave God all the attributes of energy. The only difference is God description as a conscious being, and you have more chances to win every lottery on every state from now until you die, than it being false.

  • @dejesusluisx Well. Until science actually confirms that some sort of diety actually did create the universe then i'll still not see that as fact, because you bring only speculation to the table and not evidence. It could just be nature that is the energy. Does it have to be a God? The creation of animals wasn't God as we once thought. What makes you think that the creation of the universe is God yet there's no hard evidence of it. Just because science can't explain it it's automatically God?

  • @MrCombineGuy "Does it have to be a God?" What would you call an immaterial, powerful, eternal intelligence that created the universe? Johnny? "What makes you think that the creation of the universe is God yet there's no hard evidence of it." There can't be empirical evidence, there must be always a doubt, because of free will. We exists because God wanted conscious beings in this planet to be stewards of creation and conscious beings have free will. If God were obvious, it would take it away.

  • @dejesusluisx Does it have to be conscious? It could always be nature, like always. And sure, there is not a single argument that makes it true either. And theres no single argument that makes M Theory false. I haven't seen any theories that have been solid except for String or M theory. Well, it may fit the Genesis, but it's surely a coincidence. It doesn't mean because it's a coincidence it's true. It's similar to the real deal, but it's probably not what people think. We dont know yet.

  • @MrCombineGuy "Does it have to be conscious?" There is just one alternative around it. I was revealed this. This was a message I received along with all the clarity that helped me understand when I decided to accept God. This explained to me how everything came to be and God wasn't on the picture. I was troubled by it, since it could make people lose their faith, but when I prayed for direction, I was given a Biblical passage 1Cor 1:21. God can't be understood by reason, only by faith.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""And theres no single argument that makes M Theory false."" String theory doesn't explain how the energy arranged into tiny sting packets. So it has more holes in it than a Swiss cheese. There are no coincidences when the odd against it are greater than you winning the lottery very day, on every state until the day you die. I'm sue if that happens to anyone, no one will give him not even the benefit of the doubt, much less believing it the way they believe string theory.

  • @dejesusluisx Oh jeez. Hey, how about we call this off? I like debating, but i have my limits. And honestly. I am really getting tired of this debate. And i honestly hate it when i see a new comment on my homepage, because this has no point than who can look smartest. Since we both are stubborn and we'll probably never stop debating this, let's call it a draw? (Oh and by the way. The M theory isn't the string theory and there's a reason they are called theories.)

  • @MrCombineGuy My point is not to look smarter, my point is for you to realize there is a bigger truth, for you not to close your mind and keep looking. I was a non-believer who kept looking and found more than what I was bargaining for. God is real, He transformed my life, and I'll be forever in gratitude to Him for it. You can experience the truth, is a matter of free will. Don't lose your soul over a stubborn posture. Keep looking and you'll be rewarded with all the knowledge you seek.

  • @dejesusluisx Look, if God makes you happy, then that's fine, just don't try to convert people if they personally say that they think religion is bogus.. And it's not that i wont accept God. I just don't see any evidence for him. If i do see evidence that are well explained and not are superstitions and speculations then i will consider them with a fair and rational mind, and in some way i do believe you want to appear smarter than me. It's simple human ego, so relax. Let's not start this again.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""If i do see evidence that are well explained and not are superstitions"" God is a spirit, an immaterial conscious being. All things consists of matter and/or energy, so if God isn't matter, is energy by definition. Energy is the capacity to do work, is eternal, powerful, omnipresent, wasn't created and can't be destroyed, can create matter, and was the only thing present before the BB. All these match God. What about this definition? Is it superstitious? Can you believe now?

  • @dejesusluisx Not really. Because no matter if you're Matter or Energy, you are subject to physical laws and since this God is bound by physical law, miracles are impossible, for one. Because miracles are a violantion of physical laws. Likewise, the God cannot be all knowing and all powerful, which also is a violantion of physical laws. And you can not say that he's not bound by it since he created them, because if he is energy then he still is bound by those physical laws. It's science.

  • @MrCombineGuy "miracles are a violantion of physical laws" Not necessarily, things that appeared as supernatural 2,000 yrs ago are studied by science today. God might be "natural" but we are yet to discover His true nature. Is light supernatural? No, and God is described as light. Is Love supernatural? No, and God is described as Love. Is energy supernatural?. You call it supernatural because can't be explained, at least not yet. To move atoms to resurrect a body is science at it's best.

  • @dejesusluisx Well. They are actually a violantion of physical laws. Such as a mans severed leg growing back. That's a miracle and that violates the physical laws, for example. And being all powerful is also a violation of physical laws, so miracles just cant happend because he cannot interfere with us in any way because the physical laws prevents him from doing so. So, you know what i'd believe if i were you. I'd believe in a God that only, and i mean only created the Universe or something.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""a mans severed leg growing back"" is that an actual miracle? where did you get that? "being all powerful is also a violation of physical laws" how? "he cannot interfere with us in any way because the physical laws prevents him from doing so" really? where did you get that idea from? "I'd believe in a God that only, and i mean only created the Universe" well, that is a start. Let's take it one step at a time, believing God created the universe is better than not believing anything

  • @dejesusluisx No it's not a miracle, it's an example of a miracle, it could be in the bible for all i know. Being all powerful would violate the basics of physical laws. All powerful would require to be able to break the bounds of physical laws, which does not happend, because it's impossible, no matter how you look at it, since he is energy as you say, he is subject of physical laws, so no miracles. The previous question covers the next question. No. I don't ass any reason to believe in God.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""it's an example of a miracle"" the miracles I have been close to are miracles where God acts though his creation, not overriding it. God created natural laws so he follows them. If you were to design and build a pure air room, would you sit in the living room to smoke a cigar because you can? The same way it doesn't make sense for God to violate the laws He created. To move atoms a million miles away to resurrect a body isn't supernatural, is science at it's best.

  • @dejesusluisx Honestly. How do you know thats exactly what he does? If "you cannot explain God by reason and only faith". Then you are not worth my time. You still bring speculation to the table. The fact of the matter is that Science is far from discovering everything, and clinging to God to fill those gaps is foolish at best. As i said, Science have disproven God in so many places and they still will. And planets are not even close to the heaviest objects in space.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""clinging to God to fill those gaps is foolish at best"" I agree, as it is foolish to believe out of fear of eternal punishment. I don't believe in a God of the gaps, God has manifested in me, I know Him, so I don't need any other evidence than my own evidence. You can have that evidence too if you want it, you just have to keep looking with an open mind, pray and meditate and God, slowly and gradually, will show you the way.

  • @dejesusluisx Look, if you are happy with your God, then be so. But if you come and question us for not believing in God. We will question you. And try not to convert people. I'd rather burn in eternal agony with some intelligent and decent people other than kiss gods ass, surrounded by assholes, idiots and douchebags. And God is an asshole. Let's say a nice guy is born a muslim. And a douchebag is born a christian. The nice guy goes to hell and the douchebag goes to heaven. That's not fair!

  • @MrCombineGuy "The nice guy goes to hell and the douchebag goes to heaven. That's not fair!" Man, no wonder you're an atheist, you don't have a clue of God's plan. Our Soul, when we die, go to God or not. You're either in the light or in the dark. If you're in His same wavelength, you're attracted to the light, if not, you remain in the dark. The problem is that you're fully conscious while you're in the dark, and because of that, the anxiety feels like it burns you. You have to be one with God

  • @dejesusluisx Gods plan is ridiculous and impossible. First. Gos had pre-planned all abortions on Earth. According to Gods plan, he wants abortions to happen. This makes rapists and murderers a pawn in Gods plan. And murder is a sin, and so is rape. This makes murderers and rapists blameless and that rape should be rewarded for following God. God is an asshole. He uses you as a pawn, he makes you kill someone just to send you to hell for obeying him. Can you now see how Gods plan is impossible?

  • @MrCombineGuy ""Gos had pre-planned all abortions on Earth"" Human evil is product of human free will, were did you got the crazy idea that this is God's plan?? The problem is not with God's plan, the problem is with your wrong assumptions and misconceptions. God wants us to live a life of 100% love and 100% consciousness.

  • @dejesusluisx Then why does God punish people who live with 100% love and consciousness with eternal torment and suffering because they didn't believe in him? He is a twisted, maniacal asshat whos only goal is to make him feel good, he kills on a daily basis. He's worse than Satan. Acoording to the bible Satan only killed a few. While God killed over 50% of the population. Hell, even Satan gave us free will and knowledge, while God seems to control us through fear. Satan is the good guy in this.

  • @MrCombineGuy "Then why does God punish people who live with 100% love and consciousness with eternal torment and suffering because they didn't believe in him?"" First of all God doesn't punish anyone, is your choice not to be with God. Second if you're 100% love and 100% consciousness, you realize God is real, there is no other way. Third, given the remote possibility someone could achieve that state of consciousness and not believe (probably a Buddhist monk) he will go to heaven regardless.

  • @dejesusluisx You're completely making this up. It says nowhere in the bible about what you're saying. You are trying to protect some imaginary sand god, because you are afraid of the unknown. You're afraid of what actually is out there. What actually happends when you die, so you cling to a false hope that you know inside is impossible. I have nothing more to say to you. I've made my point, and if you wanna fumble in the darkness. Then go ahead. I will not respond to your comments anymore. Bye.

  • @MrCombineGuy We are in a crucial point in human evolution. Becoming completely spiritual by rejecting all animal behavior is the next step. Only our Free Will is in the way. Atheism rejects Jesus as a role model. This represents a step back in human evolution. I planted the seed; that was my mission, now is up to you. You will not hear a voice from heaven or see a light. You will only get this message. This is it. My job is done. You still have hope, don’t loose your soul. God Bless.

  • @dejesusluisx I would wanna hear a voice from God, but i don't. I try. But no. God doesn't exist.

    user/GIIVideo

  • @MrCombineGuy ""God doesn't exist."" you don't have evidence for that either, so is a faith claim. Why changing one faith for another? Let go your skepticism and you'll hear God.

  • @dejesusluisx So you're saying that believing in a scrapped up piece of scribbling from over 3000 years ago of a ruthless and murderous diety that no one has ever seen, that has never contacted us and their existence cannot be proven will push our evolution forward? You sir are an idiot. You expect more proof of the non existence of god while you people haven't even hinted at any evidence for god in over 2000 years, instead bring only speculations that you call evidence. I call bullshit.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""Can God make a rock that he finds too heavy,"" the premise is foolish because the heaviest rock would just be a floating planet, and there are plenty of those around.

  • @dejesusluisx And btw. Being all powerful makes no sense. Can God make a rock that he finds too heavy, if no. Then he is not all powerful enough to summon a rock so heavy. And if yes. He is not all powerful because he cannot carry the rock.

  • @dejesusluisx And let me add one more thing. It's the best explanation because it's the most popular and most simple explanation. "God created the universe". That's a popular and easy explanation. It doesn't not make it true, because there are no explanations other than complicated theories to accompany the God explanation there are only so many explanations at the moment.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""It doesn't not make it true"" of course it doesn't but there is not a single argument that can make it false either.

  • @dejesusluisx [cont] And also. People can prove that he is not real by looking at the titanic mountains of evidence supporting that the universe was created through the big bang. An expandation of a singularity. From the size of an atom to the size of an orange in less then a billionth of a second. And that then the gases of "whatever it was" clustered together withthe help of gravity to create stars. The universe (not including stars and such) was not created in 6 days. It was in a few minutes.

  • @MrCombineGuy "that the universe was created through the big bang"" indeed, what we call big bang God called "there be light". Is just semantics, we give fancy names to God's actions like big band or evolution, those are just ways to describe God's ways to achieve His means. God could have created the universe in 6 days from His perspective or in 6 x 10^12 days from our perspective, since for God time is not a constraint.

    Haven't seen any evidence for God's non-existence yet. Is atheism faith?

  • @dejesusluisx The [cont] suggest there was another part, btw. Down below. It makes no sense. You're ignoring all the evidence that points to that God did not create the universe. And these scientific evidence are not metaphors. No one's said they are metaphors you're just pulling this out of your ass. I am not impressed. Oh.. And why do you believe evolution is not real, despite the tons of evidence prove it's real? Have you not researched evolution and you're just agreeing to people like you?

  • @MrCombineGuy ""You're ignoring all the evidence that points to that God did not create the universe."" Actually the scientific evidence points more towards a conscious entity beginning the universe than any other thing. You can't disprove God even is a you see a billion universes pup-up every second on every star in the universe since the BB until this day. That is about 10^50 and you need about 10^500 universes according to string theory. Science makes God more plausible today than 100 yrs ago

  • @dejesusluisx (Universe) Well, not from what i've seen, no. The reason you might think so was because the creation of the universe was created so smoothly that it seemed like there was someone behind it. But still that's no proof of God. It was all the balance of nature. And the luck of unevenness. And if you really wanna know how the universe was created, check out Stephen Hawkings "Into the universe" And no. aatheism is not a faith. It's a lack of faith. We believe in evidence, no blind faith.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""But still that's no proof of God"" Cosmologists had already proven God, they say energy created the universe. All things in the universe consists of matter and/or energy, so if God isn't matter, is energy by definition. Energy is defined as the capacity to do work, is eternal, omnipresent, wasn't created and can't be destroyed, can create matter, was the only thing present before the BB, and the energy required to make the universe must had been powerful. All these match God.

  • @dejesusluisx You don't get it. Nothing.. And i mean NOTHING was after the big bang, not energy, not matter. Nothing, according to science. This doesn't prove God.. And i've given you evidence that God doesn't exist but you simply just plug your ears and go Lalala and go in rebudal with a theory that i can't use common sense to disprove and you have no evidence of, so no. It's not a faith. Just like not smoking is a habit. And if your God has changed you. Cool story bro. But please.. Prove god.

  • @MrCombineGuy "Nothing, according to science" ^nothing is nothing anymore^ according to atheist Dr. Krauss. The quantum vacuum is a sea of energy and particles. Gen 1:2 : "the earth was a formless wasteland (quantum vacuum), and darkness covered the abyss (nothing), while God' spirit (energy) swept over the waters (a sea of energy)". Cosmologists think a collision of energy created the BB, the Bible identify at least two different forms of energy in the beginning. Modern cosmology has proven God

  • @MrCombineGuy ""aatheism is not a faith. It's a lack of faith"" It is faith because the claim ""God doesn't exists"" can't be supported with evidence, any claim that can't be supported with evidence is a faith claim.

  • @MrCombineGuy ""why do you believe evolution is not real, despite the tons of evidence prove it's real?"" evolution is real, species evolve, that is the designed mechanism to assure species variability to enhance their survival. Evolution is God's mechanism to establish diversity and a robust biomass that can withstand environmental changes.

  • @dejesusluisx (Evolution) And how would you know this? Look. I see you're reasonable enough that you see evolution as real. But, i believe you cling to God because science has yet to explain everything. It's like flying. No one back in the day thought that humans would ever fly, but science proved them wrong. And so will they with the universe and its origin. Just wait, okay?

  • @MrCombineGuy "Just wait, okay" Why? My God isn't a God of the gaps, is a living God that has transformed my life. God had manifested in me, revealed his presence and gave me evidence in which I can be confident He's with us. You don't understand, I didn't either; I was a skeptic scientist and opened my mind to the possibility and got more than what I bargained for. God is as real as microwaves or gamma radiation, God is conscious energy and skeptics won't find Him because God won't allow it.

  • 1:06 He hates atheists? Well fuck him! I hate is ugly goat-faced ass!

  • I understand why the clever authors of the bible made christians and muslims paranoid of execution for their beliefs.. I very nearly see it as our only way free of them. When they are so certain, so absolute in their beliefs, their brain is dead. They do not learn, they do not think, they do not love, they do not care.

    Is there another way? Do we just have to wait for people like them to die and hope subsequent generations have a better grasp on reality?

  • 1:46 I would shit myself if I saw him on the street

  • Richard Dawkins burn in hell.

  • I agree with Dawkins on the whole religion thing, but he's utterly wrong when it comes to hobgoblins. They're real, and they're terrifying.

    :(

  • @SpaceDogGreen2

    lol!!!

  • @SpaceDogGreen2 i concur.

    

  • When asked about the 9/11 attacks he digresses into evolution...

    Huh?

  • That Muslim said " Islam going to take over the world, and it is " ....terrorist :O

  • Personally I didn't like this documentary. I'm a huge Dawkins fan but I prefer to listen to him speak about science. If I wanted to hear this I will read, and have read, The God Delusion. Most of this is just the same rhetoric. I'd much prefer to hear Richard Dawkins elaborate on biology and the process of evolution which he does in The Selfish Gene and The Greatest Show on Earth.

  • @TheManMostMysterious

    the reason he did this was to show how religion try's to trample over what he and many other scientist try to do...I think it's equally important to be outspoken against religious and political dogma that prohibits free thought....no matter who it offends

  • @Paletero336 Well I understand completley why he did. But he's said all this stuff before in the God Delusion. So its just kind of a re-hash of info for me which is why I wasn't overly impressed with this

  • @TheManMostMysterious

    wouldn't what he displays on television of biology and other sciences be kind of re-hash of what he has written about other sciences and biology?It's best he re-hash stuff like this that was once considered too offensive for T.V to sharply criticize religion....

    funny thing is I've never read the god delusion to realize the harmful effects of religion...rather I experienced them for myself.

  • @Paletero336 Well I disagree with that first part because science is always learning new things. Every time I've watched one of his biology lectures I've learned something new. Oh well, to each his own I guess

  • @TheManMostMysterious

    yeah I guess , we can both agree though that we should never let people blinded by superstition blind others who seek to learn for themselves

  • @Paletero336 I agree wholeheartedly

  • i wouldn't want to go there...

  • I would bang Aphrodite.  Nice.

  • @ 0:53 Notice he doesn't acknowledge any of Dr. Dawkins' questions and statements.

  • Thank you so much for uploading this, buddy.

  • Yeah? Well maybe I wanna dress like a whore.

  • here's how it will go...eventually

    Scientists and muslims will have a debate whether the Quran is true or not.

    Scientists prove using reason that it's just a work of fiction. Muslisms will NEVER listen to reason or evidence against their faith...and so another war begins...

    Why only muslims? Because jews and christians bow down to intellect,reason and evidence at some point...while these lunatics will not.

  • Warning/Example:

    In 21 century Trolls became proven!

  • All I heard was a bunch of sexism, anti-modernism, and arrogance...arrogance that his (The Muslim man) beliefs are correct and everyone opposed to them is wrong.

  • "Leave our homeland, convert to our religion, ect ect because we're right and you're wrong." thats basically what he said.

    How can anyone truly think like that? To beleive without doubt that what they are doing is just and right, and that therefore there is only 1 side to the issue?

    That level or arrogance astounds me.

  • I hate how people assume that anyone who isnt religious is automatically lawless and immoral. I beleive that humans are preprogramed with laws such as "do not kill" that have evolved in us for obvious reasons. Where athiests follow these universal, common sense laws, the religious follow whatever constructed laws their faith has turned out, like revenge and exclusion. Its just unnatural.

  • The world is going to be a dark place when this man dies. *sigh*

  • "fix your women." excuse me? fix your religion, by burning your churches, synagogues, temples and mosques, your religious texts, and finally, yourselves. the rest of humanity is waiting for you to fuck off so we can live in peace and reason.

  • Tho I have only recently discovered him I absolutely love Richard Dawkins.I deeply admire how he can talk to some one they can seem to want to become physically aggressive and what seems to me intimidating and he without even flinching come's right back at them with words. This part with the Muslim i would have been prompted to to get physical in defending myself. Truly a wise and educated man far superior to me in social skills.

  • Dawkings proves that all religions are dangerous and bad, however it is clear Islam is the most dangerous and extreme by far.

    The only proof I need is how the Quran is to be taken literally and that is 100% the words of God (Allah). If Muhammed tortured his enemies, why can't those who read it and believe in it literally do exactly the same to their "enemies"?

  • Jews, Arabs, Catholics, Muslims, Hindus, Budhhists.. whatever the name is..

    we are all just human beings u religious idiots..!!

  • Lol I'm athiest and don't wanna see 2 people having sex in the middle of the street wtf is this guy on about

  • @Bundyrumowns rofl ... "fix your women" what was that about the fix part is the part that got me ... yea the radiator on my woman broke now i got to take her to the local iman ROFL!

  • @cronos1188 idiots they sound like there afraid of women, why else try and keep something at bay :O

  • @Bundyrumowns probably b/c of mass paranoia of cuckoldry lol ...

  • @Bundyrumowns I think that would be a sight to see, quite entertaining I would imagine.

  • @bigflytrap Lol that's what porn is for I don't wanna be eating lunch turn around and see someones ass staring at me.

  • There are quite a few enlightened atheists in Israel, myself included.

  • There will be no peace in the middle east because those people are the retards of the world and that is why religion came from there. The only way to peace is to turn the middle east into glass.

  • @Realtruth666

    Here's an easier sollution, which is less bloody. End the western world's dependence of cheap oil from those countries. Many oil sheiks use their money to build mosques in countries with muslim minorities. As their main source of income disappears they will go right back to living in tents or suddenly realize how dependent they are on modern technology and a sustainable, modern society. So it will be adapt or perish in poverty for them.

    Lots of problems solved at once.

  • "you let your women go out looking like that and you accept that as a norm, what is going on with your society?"

    AUTONOMY!

  • Wait wait wait, At first the guy says: Look, 417 arab villages have been attacked or something by jews and now you atheists are sitting and drinking tea...

    THEN he says: "All we want are the non-muslims off the land of mohammed".

    So they want us to end a problem that they made big even though we aren't allowed to interfere? Ughhh?....

  • The United States should not have supported the formation of Israel in the first place, and should not continue to support the Jews. Am I Muslim? No. I am atheist. I think that both religions are equally ridiculous.