This man is typical of many gay republicans. Very hypocritical, even willing to advance people that will discriminate against you for who you are. Anyway, they are the minority, albeit a considerable minority among gays.
In this case that gentleman was not the right person to have this type of argument with, instead the broadcasters, should had have a debate over the phone and himself from the studio with someone who he elected, who would be able to give better answers regarding this mattar, rather than a public embarrassment, instead of a exchange of ideas base on policies. english is not my first language.
They are people, who are just not well educated regarding politics or law, and when they have a argument against somebody that is educated in this issues, in this case the broadcaster, this is what happens, the none educated one plays a fool out of himself, for lack of knowledge and a very low understanding of social issues, and how the laws affect the culture of a country and the behaviour of the people in general.
They are people, who are just not well educated regarding politics or law, and when they have a argument against somebody that is educated in this issues, in this case the broadcaster, this is what happens, the none educated one plays a fool out of himself, for lack of knowledge and a very low understanding of social issues, and how the laws affect the culture of a country and the behaviour of the people in general.
What a stupid half-cast man. Clearly he lost the debate and instead of admitting he wasted his vote. He thought defending a point that was simailar to Hitler would be better.....stupid mulatto.
This man is a self-loathing queen. Michaelangelo, I am so glad to have found you on youtube. I remember your rantings from the days of Outweek magazine back in the 80s.
Thanks for continuing to be out there and be a great voice for the GLBT community.
Mike, thank you for pointing out the ridiculousness of the position of gay Republicans. (Not to mention the endemically discriminatory position of the Republican candidates.)
That caller is just sad and, frankly, pretty pathetic. He doesn't understand history or how much easier his life is due to the struggles of those in the civil rights movement. He takes many of his rights for granted because he doesn't understand they didn't just magically appear but had to be fought for.
He's just being consistent with his libertarian ideology in terms of accommodations (employment, hotels, etc.). Stupid but consistent. Where he's inconsistent is his reservation of the term marriage to man and woman. If we had non-discriminatory civil unions for everyone on the state level and then marriage as a religious institution, the fight would become intrademonational. But he wants het-only religious marriage besides his ridiculous idea that marriage should be only religious. My 2¢.
I was blue, just as blue as I could be Ev'ry day was a cloudy day for me Then good luck came a-knocking at my door Skies were gray but they're not gray anymore Blue skies Smiling at me Nothing but blue skies Do I see Bluebirds Singing a song Nothing but bluebirds All day long I should care if the wind blows east or west I should fret if the worst looks like the best I should mind if they say it can't be true I should smile, that's exactly what I do
This man is typical of many gay republicans. Very hypocritical, even willing to advance people that will discriminate against you for who you are. Anyway, they are the minority, albeit a considerable minority among gays.
phantomsuccour 10 months ago
In this case that gentleman was not the right person to have this type of argument with, instead the broadcasters, should had have a debate over the phone and himself from the studio with someone who he elected, who would be able to give better answers regarding this mattar, rather than a public embarrassment, instead of a exchange of ideas base on policies. english is not my first language.
panamanubian 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
They are people, who are just not well educated regarding politics or law, and when they have a argument against somebody that is educated in this issues, in this case the broadcaster, this is what happens, the none educated one plays a fool out of himself, for lack of knowledge and a very low understanding of social issues, and how the laws affect the culture of a country and the behaviour of the people in general.
panamanubian 2 years ago
They are people, who are just not well educated regarding politics or law, and when they have a argument against somebody that is educated in this issues, in this case the broadcaster, this is what happens, the none educated one plays a fool out of himself, for lack of knowledge and a very low understanding of social issues, and how the laws affect the culture of a country and the behaviour of the people in general.
panamanubian 2 years ago
What a stupid half-cast man. Clearly he lost the debate and instead of admitting he wasted his vote. He thought defending a point that was simailar to Hitler would be better.....stupid mulatto.
xxxxFootballxxxx 3 years ago
This man is a self-loathing queen. Michaelangelo, I am so glad to have found you on youtube. I remember your rantings from the days of Outweek magazine back in the 80s.
Thanks for continuing to be out there and be a great voice for the GLBT community.
LBoy3 3 years ago
he is a fucking moron, he makes gay look bad
doremon313 3 years ago
Mike, thank you for pointing out the ridiculousness of the position of gay Republicans. (Not to mention the endemically discriminatory position of the Republican candidates.)
vital427 3 years ago
OMG this guy is too much. SO much for an educated opinion. This guy doesn't even know what his vote means. Sad!!
GymProv 3 years ago
That caller is just sad and, frankly, pretty pathetic. He doesn't understand history or how much easier his life is due to the struggles of those in the civil rights movement. He takes many of his rights for granted because he doesn't understand they didn't just magically appear but had to be fought for.
UnionStayshyn 3 years ago
He's just being consistent with his libertarian ideology in terms of accommodations (employment, hotels, etc.). Stupid but consistent. Where he's inconsistent is his reservation of the term marriage to man and woman. If we had non-discriminatory civil unions for everyone on the state level and then marriage as a religious institution, the fight would become intrademonational. But he wants het-only religious marriage besides his ridiculous idea that marriage should be only religious. My 2¢.
abmindprof 3 years ago
Mike scares me more than McCain and Palin...and they scare the shit outta me!!
mrscani 3 years ago
This guy is certainly white,straight,racist and homophobic.......a true republican lol!
verybadtongue 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HomoGeneyes 3 years ago