Watching this stupid lady commenting without knowing the facts make me thinking that you create more problems to the environment. Get a life stupid and ugly glassed b""tch!!!
0:38 "Its not carbon neutral, its worse than coal"
The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, in their 2004 report Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source, estimate coal’s emissions to be 1,054gCO2/kWh. Note that this is “lifecycle emissions”, i.e. including mining, transport, building the plant and burning and since it is measured in “CO2eq” it includes all greenhouse gases. However the same source puts a figure of 77gCO2eq/kWh for biomass electricity.
Even allowing for differences in the specifics of this plant in question and where it sources its fuel from the statement the protestor makes at 0:38, "Its not carbon neutral, its worse than coal" is either grossly misinformed or deliberately misleading. According to the figures above biomass is 92.5% less carbon intensive the coal.
Who do YOU believe a protester chained to a gate or the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution?
1:50 "World leaders are meeting in Copenhagen to find the solution to stopping long term climate change... large scale biomass shouldn't be part of their answer".
According to a study (Lettens et al., 2003) published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Biomass and Bioenergy "Several studies have examined the possibilities of bio-energy crops to mitigate the greenhouse effect. Their overall assessment tends to be that bio-energy does indeed lower the GHG emissions compared to fossil power"
1:11 "Campaigners climbed the towers to drop their banners and say biomass was a dirty joke".
The European Environment Agency's 2006 report "How much bioenergy can Europe Produce Without Harming the Environment?" said:
"The study concludes that significant amounts of biomass can technically be available to support ambitious renewable energy targets, even if strict environmental constraints are applied".
The same study also ranked the UK 6th out of the EU25 for biomass potential by 2030.
1:23 " Really large scale biomass like this is a really unsustainable way of generating electricity".
According to a study (Demirbas et al., 2009) published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Energy Conservation and Management "Utilization of biomass resources will be one of the most important factors for environmental protection in the 21st century" and "biomass helps the atmospheric CO2 recycling and does not contribute to the greenhouse effect".
1:40 " We feel we should be investing all the money we are investing in these [biomass plants] in reliable renewables like offshore wind and wave and tidal".
According to a study (Demirbas et al., 2009) published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Energy Conservation and Management:
"Biomass is considered the renewable energy source with the highest potential to contribute to the energy needs of modern society for both the industrialized and developing countries worldwide."
South Wales is a particularly appropriate location for a biomass power plant. According to a report by IPA Energy Consulting and the Scottish Agricultural College for the Scottish Executive South and West Wales has, compared to the rest of the UK " the highest availability of woodfuel per square kilometre" AND out of 11 UK regions the study evaluated Wales has the 3rd best potential yields of energy crop.
no, i only asked you a question, my view on the matter is that "man made climate change" is a fraudulently FRAMED debate and instead of looking at temperature change due to CO2, the only relevant variables in that version of the debate, we could look at desertification due to arrogant imperial mentality. The Roman's managed it in North Africa without any need for fossil fuels
as if you know the correct view LOL! -Do you realize that this planet supports your life? THAT WE TAKE TAKE TAKE? CAUSE WE NEED NEED NEED.... Oh no its a fraud to care for the environment but its legal to pay hockey players millions to shoot a puck around on ice. THIS WORLD ORDER IS FkD. CLIMATE CHANGE HAPPENS WITH OR WITHOUT HUMAN INVOLVEMENT.WE SPED UP THE NATURAL PROCESS BY FILLING OUR BREATHING BUBBLE WITH CO2. People who just dismiss what could be the truth are so very stupid.
They are burning logs lol. This is a step back to pre-industrial energy generaton technology. How anyone in government can seriously beleive that this is viable is beyond me. My guess is that this is all heavily subsidised by central government to meet arbitrary targets for carbon neutral electricity generation.
Its not just government that believes this, and its likes is practical its a significant number in the scientific community too.
"You GUESS that this is all heavily subsidised". Guessing isn't good enough. Refrain from giving an opinion until you either know one way or the other.
@yeahwotevaman Its a shame you have to resort to being arrogantly dismissive and childishly insulting. Perhaps you do so because of your paper thin knowledge of issues such as those you commented on in the this video?
shut up you stupid bitch
panther590 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
Watching this stupid lady commenting without knowing the facts make me thinking that you create more problems to the environment. Get a life stupid and ugly glassed b""tch!!!
yokijc 1 year ago
0:38 "Its not carbon neutral, its worse than coal"
The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, in their 2004 report Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source, estimate coal’s emissions to be 1,054gCO2/kWh. Note that this is “lifecycle emissions”, i.e. including mining, transport, building the plant and burning and since it is measured in “CO2eq” it includes all greenhouse gases. However the same source puts a figure of 77gCO2eq/kWh for biomass electricity.
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
Even allowing for differences in the specifics of this plant in question and where it sources its fuel from the statement the protestor makes at 0:38, "Its not carbon neutral, its worse than coal" is either grossly misinformed or deliberately misleading. According to the figures above biomass is 92.5% less carbon intensive the coal.
Who do YOU believe a protester chained to a gate or the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution?
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
1:50 "World leaders are meeting in Copenhagen to find the solution to stopping long term climate change... large scale biomass shouldn't be part of their answer".
According to a study (Lettens et al., 2003) published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Biomass and Bioenergy "Several studies have examined the possibilities of bio-energy crops to mitigate the greenhouse effect. Their overall assessment tends to be that bio-energy does indeed lower the GHG emissions compared to fossil power"
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
1:11 "Campaigners climbed the towers to drop their banners and say biomass was a dirty joke".
The European Environment Agency's 2006 report "How much bioenergy can Europe Produce Without Harming the Environment?" said:
"The study concludes that significant amounts of biomass can technically be available to support ambitious renewable energy targets, even if strict environmental constraints are applied".
The same study also ranked the UK 6th out of the EU25 for biomass potential by 2030.
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
1:23 " Really large scale biomass like this is a really unsustainable way of generating electricity".
According to a study (Demirbas et al., 2009) published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Energy Conservation and Management "Utilization of biomass resources will be one of the most important factors for environmental protection in the 21st century" and "biomass helps the atmospheric CO2 recycling and does not contribute to the greenhouse effect".
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
1:40 " We feel we should be investing all the money we are investing in these [biomass plants] in reliable renewables like offshore wind and wave and tidal".
According to a study (Demirbas et al., 2009) published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Energy Conservation and Management:
"Biomass is considered the renewable energy source with the highest potential to contribute to the energy needs of modern society for both the industrialized and developing countries worldwide."
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
South Wales is a particularly appropriate location for a biomass power plant. According to a report by IPA Energy Consulting and the Scottish Agricultural College for the Scottish Executive South and West Wales has, compared to the rest of the UK " the highest availability of woodfuel per square kilometre" AND out of 11 UK regions the study evaluated Wales has the 3rd best potential yields of energy crop.
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
Comment removed
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
Comment removed
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
Not one of you lot are Welsh!
swanziegirl 2 years ago
THANK GOD TOO! LOL
MasterVeggie 2 years ago
Comment removed
taolun88 2 years ago
@taolun88 Do you really think the mass media outlets would broadcast it with the money of corporations behind them?
MinimoviesInc 2 years ago
You do realize that man made climate change is a fraud, right? Ever heard of 'climategate'?
Permaculturist 2 years ago
are you sure of that?
robtherub 2 years ago
are you blind?
Permaculturist 2 years ago
no, i only asked you a question, my view on the matter is that "man made climate change" is a fraudulently FRAMED debate and instead of looking at temperature change due to CO2, the only relevant variables in that version of the debate, we could look at desertification due to arrogant imperial mentality. The Roman's managed it in North Africa without any need for fossil fuels
robtherub 2 years ago
as if you know the correct view LOL! -Do you realize that this planet supports your life? THAT WE TAKE TAKE TAKE? CAUSE WE NEED NEED NEED.... Oh no its a fraud to care for the environment but its legal to pay hockey players millions to shoot a puck around on ice. THIS WORLD ORDER IS FkD. CLIMATE CHANGE HAPPENS WITH OR WITHOUT HUMAN INVOLVEMENT.WE SPED UP THE NATURAL PROCESS BY FILLING OUR BREATHING BUBBLE WITH CO2. People who just dismiss what could be the truth are so very stupid.
MasterVeggie 2 years ago
as if you know the correct view LOL!
TrollCatcher2010 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch this series from the Professor.
David Bellamy - Challenging Orthodoxy
/watch?v=Qm1kFY8BpS8
Google or YT search
"Climategate"
PikeSdream 2 years ago
They are burning logs lol. This is a step back to pre-industrial energy generaton technology. How anyone in government can seriously beleive that this is viable is beyond me. My guess is that this is all heavily subsidised by central government to meet arbitrary targets for carbon neutral electricity generation.
yeahwotevaman 2 years ago 5
a step back, or two, seems inevitable, what with the peak of oil production occuring and everything
robtherub 2 years ago
but burning logs have no net impact on global CO2 if they come from responsible forestry
robtherub 2 years ago
@yeahwotevaman
Its not just government that believes this, and its likes is practical its a significant number in the scientific community too.
"You GUESS that this is all heavily subsidised". Guessing isn't good enough. Refrain from giving an opinion until you either know one way or the other.
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
@WockneysRedBarrel Whatever you say, chump.
yeahwotevaman 1 year ago
@yeahwotevaman Its a shame you have to resort to being arrogantly dismissive and childishly insulting. Perhaps you do so because of your paper thin knowledge of issues such as those you commented on in the this video?
WockneysRedBarrel 1 year ago
@WockneysRedBarrel Yeah... you win.
yeahwotevaman 1 year ago