I have a question..... why is America going to use M4 series (Carbine series) rather than M 16? I googled it and the answer never came out... For the first time... google failed me.... In addition, what guns do you guys prefer (for eg I like G 36 and M 16A4... just ma style :P) ? Feel free to answer !!!
@TheZombieSasquatch And more luckily, this lovely rifle only appear on Real games like MGS4 and Battlefield. Never been on any single Call of Shit (Read: CoD) games (Except in its NDS version but that's out of factor)
The 2-round burst feature is not designed to penetrate armor, nor would it be particularly successful at this against the Interceptor or Dragonskin, for example. It's designed to allow the two rounds to be fired in the same time as one, and use recoil characteristics to ensure the two rounds are felt as only one long push after the bullets have already left the barrel. Thus you get semi-auto aimed fire (the backbone of infantry training) with more accuracy and twice the lead on target per pull.
@EntropicMisanthropic The 2 rounds hitting the same area would cause more damage than one individual round. If you got shot by this weapon, it would be twice as worst than getting hit by a single round from a AK-74. And Are you aware that the US army tested Pinnacle Armor's Dragon Skin and it was considered a failure?
@FiveTwoSevenTHR It looks fine. An-94 advantages in every aspect compared to other assault rifles. In mid & far ranges. The 2 shot burst mechanism will deal more damage when the shooter hits a target, compared to others who only will deal 1 round. An-94 also fires 600 RPM on full auto which is much easier to control than other assault rifles. It's also longer in design than bullpups meaning it will win in bayonet fights as well. An-94 makes the M4 look like a childs weapon.
@FiveTwoSevenTHR I honestly don't care what this weapon looks like, if this weapon is as resilient as the AK's are, the design and features of this weapon make it superior to all existing rifles today.
can anyone tell me if the higher rate of fire with burst mode is higher only during 2 shots or it can really fire faster than on full auto if we shoot during 1 minute??
@xxxCRAZYLOVExxx Well, the AN-94 reaches 1800 rounds/min in two-round burst mode but also during the two initial shots on selected fully automatic fire, with following rounds cycling down to 600 rounds/min.
@xPBTx so if someone shot the 2 burst mode next to someone with full auto, who would have shot more bullets in 60 seconds? because i believe there's gap between every 2 bursts that can reduce the total rounds fired in 60 seconds
@xxxCRAZYLOVExxx Well, I will explain you what is the point of this two-round burst mode on this weapon; the AN-94 is chambered for the 5.45x39 mm, aka " Poison Bullet " because the factor of lethality of this round is very high for its category, however, this one is made for body kill, not for armor piercing, that's why the AN-94 has a two-round burst mode which able the rate of fire climb up to 1800 rds/min, allowing the two shots to hit the same point in order to pierce body-armor.
@xPBTx u know, thats exactly why i thought it fired 2 rounds at 1800 rds/min so they can hit one after the other at the same spot to pierce armor :), but now u confirmed it for me ;)
@enamoev Ahh!!! I noticed after visiting your channel! xD Kinda stupid of me xD ...Thank you for uploading these videos of these awesome weapons! :D AN-94 is my favorite! It's really brilliant!
@1978atcarroll The narrator just said that it surpasses all other modern firearms in accuracy while shooting from unstable positions, that means in stable positions it is even more accurate.
@1978atcarroll yes of course its more accurate... not only cuz of the system but of the caliber too! the 5.45x39... <<< used in Ak-74 is better in characteristics than the 7.62x39... <<< used in Ak-47...
this gun is not only more accurate than the 47 its most accurate to my opinion... in range of 200 meters or so the 2 bullets hit the same spot! the reason for it was to penetrate body armor... just so everyone knows... cuz people just yap saying its pointless!
@enamoev It seems to be a damn good weapon, from what I've seen. I'm still undecided about whether or not it surpasses the M-16, though. (maybe I'm biased, being American).
@enamoev That two round burst function is amazing! I hope I live to see the day when civilians can purchase a version of the Nikonov Assault rifle (though I'm doubtful). This is likely to be my favorite dream gun of all time, along with the AEK-971. I would love to see the Nikonov in action with a sound suppressor instead of the advanced flash/recoil dampener, although I'm not sure how a silencer would fare with a recoiling barrel and two round burst. But nothing is impossible!
@enamoev That two round burst function is amazing! I hope I live to see the day when civilians can purchase a version of the Nikonov Assault rifle (though I'm doubtful). This is likely to be my favorite dream gun of all time, along with the AEK-971. I would love to see the Nikonov in action with a sound suppressor instead of the advanced flash/recoil dampener, although I'm not sure how a silencer would fare with a recoiling barrel and two round burst. But nothing is impossible!
@linuxpowerification lol u r the freaking retard by comparing this gun to any other gun in reliability...
have u shot the gun? have u been in the battle with the gun? how the fuck can u know what this gun is capable of? its like when some dickheads r saying AK variants r not reliable... but in all they know nothing about them! say something smarter...
here it comes the retardness... take your head out of your ass,or better put that gun up your ass and shoot.Like i would waste my time with you talking about something that is made to kill other people -.-
@linuxpowerification 1st of all guns dont kill people... people do! ever heard of this phrase dumb fuck? im talking about this gun not as a people killer but as a working mechanism... if u r being fed shit it doenst mean u can feed shit to others... keep ur shit ur self! and 2nd of all id bitch slap ur ass like a lil cunt for talking tough on here... winkstain;))
Guns are made to save lives. It is bad people who use them to kill people. Just as a steak knife is used to cut steak, but some use them to stab folks.
@rjrichar Did. It hoever applies only to double shot mode - all the shooting in this video is actually the double shot mode, not singleshots althru it looks and almost sounds as such. The rifle is said to cost five times the price of AK74, and for all the complicatedness of its design it offers little advantage, so the whole design is dubious (no mater how interesting it is). It is said to be used by special forces, but IMHO thats just PR.
@kop4321 It utilizes a very complicated feed mechanism with small tolerances, so yes, you heard right. It is too expensive for general military use (5-6 times the price of a new AK-74), so no worries there.
@GUNDAMZGOK Please, stop with these video game comments. Really, it is sick that hose MW2 fags already spammed their stupid ''knowledge'' about guns in other gun videos.
@mishgun420 LOL it's called 5.45x39 everywhere else. the U.S. seems stuck in its old "my way or the high way" style that they used in the cold war era.
@purplecurtisimo i realize that the entire world uses the metric system (besides America) and its much simpler then the american system, but i live in the states so i'm stuck using inches and feet :)
5.56x45 has the benefit of commercial loadings and better bullet construction. otherwise 5.45 and 5.56 are near identical in their external ballistics (most ballistic charts of 5.56 are from a 20" barrel) hornady is close to releasing their 5.45 vmax and it fragments pretty good from looking their gel tests. as far as mil-spec 5.45 goes.. it doesn't fragment, but it does begin to yaw very quickly.. not as lethal as fragmenting but still creates wound channels which are difficult to treat/probe
@jmk0309 thats why the russians had to downgrade to a smaller caliber.. 5.45 in the ak-74.. because of the ballistics, size. and what the bullets are made of, is what makes them more dangerous. 7.62 goes in, and threw, while the 5.56 goes inside of the body, splits and creates a heck of a mess. the reason they downgraded on size, is because not only is the 5.56 deadly accurate, but it is also more practical, and lethal.
I would choose the H&K G3 over any weapon on this planet. I'm sorry, but 5.56 just doesn't cut it when you shoot to kill. None of this shoot and wound soft garbage, because the terrorists sure don't care with bombs strapped on their chests. You must remember the terrorists in Iraq today are usually high on a drug, so I would much rather hit them once or twice with a 7.62, or you can go the 5.56 route and hit them 4-5 times before the target is dead. Your choice.
people have survived .50 bmg hits... point is, it's all about shot placement... otherwise you're arguing about which round will make you more dead... pretty moot point imo.
To be honest I like balanced gas system better then shifted pulse one. Simpler and no doubt almost equally effective and cheaper to make as well. Easier to understand too. AK-107/108 and AEK-971/972/973 are very stable weapons too.
When is Russia going to learn that low power cartridges were a mistake? US operators (and I'd assume their NATO counterparts) are dropping 5.56 for 6.8 SPC and 7.62 NATO No doubt Russia needs an improved round over the 7.62x39 because it's not terribly accurate, but they shouldn't accept higher accuracy at the cost of lesser stopping power. I'd almost guarantee when the US gets around to updating it's rifles (after the Iraq disaster is ended) it'll fire a heavier round.
Yeah, you don't know what you're talking about. Technically no rifle will fire full of water. Water doesn't compress, so a piston system won't be able to cycle with a rifle full of water. Rifles like the HK 416/417 and LWRC's range are meant to drain completely in about a second. An AK-47 will not drain so rapidly. Why don't you do the over the beach test with an AK-47/AKM and fire it after letting it drain approximately one second?
@varanid9 Why do you think the XM8 died a quick death? One of the reasons was it was 5.56. The US Army and Marines have produced very good marksmen. Guys that can hit targets beyond 400m with iron sights and out significantly further with something like an ACOG. Eventually some bullet bigger than 5.56mm but smaller than 7.62mm is going to become standard. It's just not going to be anytime soon since the US is dead broke from two wars.
@Nater245689 The XM8's death wasn't particularly "quick", and it had nothing to do with being a 5.56. The next service round will probably be less than 5mm.
@varanid9 Sub 5mm projectiles? Why would you even think this. 5.56mm doesn't have the stopping power, the range, or the penetration for current operational requirements so why would the DoD want an even smaller, less powerful cartridge? They wouldn't. Everything that's been learned from the last ten years or so points to a new catridge in the same catagory as 6.8 SPC, .280 British, or 7.62x39. Something along those lines, bigger than 5.56 and smaller than 7.62 NATO.
@Nater245689 Currently, the army is getting good results with heavy grain 5.56 bullets. Still doesn't have the range of .30 or 6.8, but most troops don't need it anyway (Afghanistan the exception cuz mountain and open terrain), anyway, "stopping power" is a myth. Statistically, .30 rounds also had many people recieve multiple shots and still recover, gun-geek magazine articles notwithstanding. Future infantry weapons seem to be going to high velocity sub-5mm projectiles (HK G-11 caseless ammo
@varanid9 The G11 was cancelled one, two it was designed during the Cold War. Cold War ballistics theory was all for smaller, faster rounds. Rifle engagements were to happen at short range while more powerful weapons (mortars, artillery) would destroy infantry at long range. What we 'learned' about ballistics in the Cold War is being unlearned now.
@Nater245689 The G11 was cancelled because the Bundeswehr couldn't justify the cost of such an expensive new weapons system when the fall of the GDR left so many unused AKs in their possession, while it seemed the Soviets were no longer such a threat. They were actually on the verge of perfecting it, the only issue remaining being one of overheating on extended full-auto fire.
@varanid9 Do you know what happens with caseless ammo when a gun overheats? It's a lot more dramatic than when a traditional gun overheats. They did play around with some higher temperature propellents, but this problem still haunts caseless weapons designers to this day.
So many unused AKs? No, they dropped the G11 for the more conventional G36.
@Nater245689 The AKs are in storage for issue in case of emergency, I know the G11 overheats, the project was killed, though last I heard, german SPECOPs still had them in inventory (they may no longer). It is just a matter of time before it is perfected, like everything else.
@varanid9 .30 rounds? What do you mean? 30-30? ..30-03? .300 Winchester Mag? .303 British? .300 Lapua Magnum? I'm guessing that you mean .30 carbine, in which case a very similar round in theory to 5.56mm. Basically a low powered cartridge with little recoil and little stopping power. You really need to pay attention to the other mm designation in rounds. I.E. 7.62x51mm, 7.62x63mm catridges (.308 Winchester and 30-06 Springfield) pack a lot more punch than something like 7.62x39mm.
@Nater245689 I meant .30 as in it really doesn't matter....most military issue FMJ zips through its target unless it happens to hit a few key spots of the body. The more powerful the round, the more energy it wastes beyond the target.
@varanid9 Maybe you should. I've fired quite a few rounds in my day. No, I was not in the Army, no I am not an 'arm chair Barney Fife'. The Army isn't too willing to take you if you have had two ACL ruptures and metal in your hand. That said, at least I'm not some 14-year-old brat that pretends I'm some legendary operator. I'm just someone who is interested in and knows a lot about the science of killing people. A subject you have much to learn about.
@Nater245689 I have, I've been in the military and law enforcement. I still have a close circle of military that actually does the room entries in Iraq, not truck drivers and prison guards. Also, I study real world surveys of shootings, not gun magazine hype. You may not be a 14 year old brat, but you sound just like one.
@Nater245689 Being a "killing scientist" that has never killed anybody is the same as being a chemist that has never mixed chemicals. They just repeat stuff that they read and take it as fact when for all they know it could be false information.
@Tippet76 John Garand, John Browning. They were never soldiers, yet they build some of the best firearms in history. As for Varnid's arguments, they're kinda hard to reason with when you see more guys carrying heavier caliber rifles into battle. But, he's just some 14-year-old Warsaw Pact fanboy who trolls Youtube. What can you expect?
@Nater245689 Also, electro-magnetic rifles and hand-held railguns also use sub-5mm rounds, and though I could be wrong on my next statement, I believe the "metalstorm" experiments are going more towards smaller, faster projectiles.
@varanid9 Hand-held rail guns? You just proved that you don't know anything. There are no hand held rail guns, there won't be for some time. The only 'rail guns' around are the size of a building and suck huge amounts of electricity. They have capacitor banks that would will dump trucks. They have to be rebuilt every few shots. The only field ready products from Metal Storm is a triple shot, semi-automatic under barrel grenade launcher. Your knowledge of weapons comes from video games.
@Nater245689 No, perhaps you should get your info from something other than magazine articles. Hand-held rail rifles have been experimented on since the 90s, but key word, experimental....so far. You can see solid projectile metalstorms on the history channel, for god's sake.
@varanid9 Wow, you've just proven your ignorance. Metal Storm isn't a 'rail gun'. It still uses powder just like a conventional firearm. The difference being the charge is ignited with an electrical pulse instead of a firing pin. Now you also could be mistaking coil guns for rail guns. Single stage coil guns have been made, but you'd need a multi-stage to do any damage and they are still very large. Maybe you should get some information, period.
If you're talking about the old-style direct impingement rifles, you are correct. If you're talking about the new short stroke gas piston rifles for Barrett, LWRC, and HK; you're dead wrong. I've seen the LWRC and HK rifles fired when full of mud, sand, and even water. If you tried to fire an AK full of water, it'd blow up in your face.
@varanid9 Yeah, that's why SOCOM itself requested the development of the 6.8 cartridge and rifle manufacturers like LWRC have received request after request for AR-pattern rifles in 7.62mm with barrel lengths ranging from 12 to 24 inches.
6.8 SPC was developed because US operators can shoot far beyond the effective range of the 5.55NATO round, even it's hotter Mk.262 variant. Even regular troops can now shoot beyond the effective range of 5.56 NATO.
@varanid9. What are you, 14? You make immature comments on weapons and karate (you have to spar with protection to prevent brain injury). If you fully submerged and AK47/AKM/AK-74 you'd have to spend considerable time draining it. You'd have to take the magazine out, open the bolt, and drain it for at least a minute. It's not going to drain in one second. They can take mud, sand, whatever. They don't do well full of water because that takes a lot of specific engineering.
@Nater245689 well acctully for ure information theres video on youtube of someone firing an ak that was just in water it only takes 2 or 3 secs to drain, the ak, like most Russian guns, has incredible reliability.
@tayatay5 3 seconds vs. >1 second is a big difference. The time it takes to pop out of the water, acquire a target, and shoot is around one second. If you had to wait three seconds, you'd be exposed to god knows what. for more than two seconds longer. Which would you rather have?
@Nater245689 You talk like an armchair barney fife. Let me guess....you've already proven your ignorance of reality with phrases like "stopping power", and the assumption that 5.56 is somehow a pimple-popper....I bet you also think that fast handgun magazine changes are a really big deal, don't you?
Dear Santa...
xxxCRAZYLOVExxx 1 week ago in playlist Favorite videos
is it only me or is the clip kinda of tilted to the side?
yahoodanilo 2 weeks ago
I have a question..... why is America going to use M4 series (Carbine series) rather than M 16? I googled it and the answer never came out... For the first time... google failed me.... In addition, what guns do you guys prefer (for eg I like G 36 and M 16A4... just ma style :P) ? Feel free to answer !!!
Ausfy 3 weeks ago
Since this isn't being exported atm, any companies make a high quality airsoft or BB replica?
Blackthorne32 1 month ago
is the weapon still able to shoot when a knife bajonett is mounted ?
lola2333332 1 month ago
Dear Santa....
swoldier1016 1 month ago
OH MY FUCKING GOD FINALLY I SEE A REAL RUSSIAN GUN VIDEO NOT CALL OFSHIT
TheZombieSasquatch 1 month ago in playlist Tactical Carbine
@TheZombieSasquatch And more luckily, this lovely rifle only appear on Real games like MGS4 and Battlefield. Never been on any single Call of Shit (Read: CoD) games (Except in its NDS version but that's out of factor)
COD04MW 1 month ago
but is it better than ak-74m in real world?
cardude1992 1 month ago
@cardude1992
Russian special forces wouldn't have adopted it as their standard rifle if it weren't better...
NailbombSurprise 1 month ago
@NailbombSurprise i guess youre right. but i still dont think its more reliable.
cardude1992 1 month ago
The 2-round burst feature is not designed to penetrate armor, nor would it be particularly successful at this against the Interceptor or Dragonskin, for example. It's designed to allow the two rounds to be fired in the same time as one, and use recoil characteristics to ensure the two rounds are felt as only one long push after the bullets have already left the barrel. Thus you get semi-auto aimed fire (the backbone of infantry training) with more accuracy and twice the lead on target per pull.
EntropicMisanthropic 2 months ago
@EntropicMisanthropic The 2 rounds hitting the same area would cause more damage than one individual round. If you got shot by this weapon, it would be twice as worst than getting hit by a single round from a AK-74. And Are you aware that the US army tested Pinnacle Armor's Dragon Skin and it was considered a failure?
Sun6Tzu 2 months ago
@Sun6Tzu becuz the ceramic plated were to heavy for us troops. it wud have saved 100s of lifes tho.
brakuda66 1 month ago
Абакан.Один из высокоточных автоматов.Лёгкий и просто шикарный.Состоит на вооружении войсковых спецподразделений.
FullExterminatus 2 months ago
Did anyone else notice that the magazine is skewered in a weird direction?
conick9599 2 months ago
@conick9599 Yeah, I still don't understand why.
FiveTwoSevenTHR 2 months ago
That Gp-25 looks terrible as a under-barrel.
Sun6Tzu 2 months ago
@Sun6Tzu The gun looks terrible period.
FiveTwoSevenTHR 2 months ago
@FiveTwoSevenTHR It looks fine. An-94 advantages in every aspect compared to other assault rifles. In mid & far ranges. The 2 shot burst mechanism will deal more damage when the shooter hits a target, compared to others who only will deal 1 round. An-94 also fires 600 RPM on full auto which is much easier to control than other assault rifles. It's also longer in design than bullpups meaning it will win in bayonet fights as well. An-94 makes the M4 look like a childs weapon.
Sun6Tzu 2 months ago
@Sun6Tzu I didn't say it was a bad weapon, just that it's fugly.
FiveTwoSevenTHR 2 months ago
@FiveTwoSevenTHR I honestly don't care what this weapon looks like, if this weapon is as resilient as the AK's are, the design and features of this weapon make it superior to all existing rifles today.
Sun6Tzu 2 months ago 4
Do you have an AEK 971 video?
MrEvilOwen 2 months ago
WHY BECAUSE OF BF3?
loismlsx 2 months ago
@loismlsx No. I knew about the AEK 971 before BF3. It is my fav assault rifle.
MrEvilOwen 2 months ago
Its not being exported, unfortunately.
xavier6757 3 months ago
@xavier6757 As someone living in a soon to be police state, I'm glad.
DamazViccar 3 months ago
Once I dreamed I had one of these.
damianfors 3 months ago
How much for the GUN?
OutlawSouljah89 3 months ago
@OutlawSouljah89 just a bottle of vodka at your local russian gun dealer...
softaapje 2 months ago
@OutlawSouljah89 Join the Russian Army and you might get to use one.
boredgunner 2 months ago
Wait wait wait...>So ur saying It ONLY 3 ROUND BERST....HOPE NOT!
LeapordSoldier 3 months ago
@LeapordSoldier its a 2 round burst...
enamoev 3 months ago 2
Battlefield bad company 2 brought me here
but it's a great gun
SouthEasternLoey 3 months ago
this gun is so fuckin sexy, i wonder if i can buy it
MrSantiago485 3 months ago
The hand guard makes the GP grenade launcher look akward.
psycobillysutter 4 months ago
this gun is ouaaaaaaaa
TATARSTAN59500 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the AN 94 operating mechanism
youtube.com/watch?v=3JxedhGg7z0
youtube.com/watch?v=Tfw4KIge_y0
If this link is not working, search for "AN 94 operating mechanism of two round burst" and click on the first and second results.
imalchanaka 5 months ago
Comment removed
imalchanaka 5 months ago
Thats 2 shots theyre shooting at the beginning ? wow seems like one bullet
Luger718A1 5 months ago
the only thing uglier then russian weapons is what the guns do to their victims
123SupArman123 5 months ago
can anyone tell me if the higher rate of fire with burst mode is higher only during 2 shots or it can really fire faster than on full auto if we shoot during 1 minute??
xxxCRAZYLOVExxx 5 months ago
@xxxCRAZYLOVExxx Well, the AN-94 reaches 1800 rounds/min in two-round burst mode but also during the two initial shots on selected fully automatic fire, with following rounds cycling down to 600 rounds/min.
xPBTx 4 months ago
@xPBTx so if someone shot the 2 burst mode next to someone with full auto, who would have shot more bullets in 60 seconds? because i believe there's gap between every 2 bursts that can reduce the total rounds fired in 60 seconds
xxxCRAZYLOVExxx 4 months ago
@xxxCRAZYLOVExxx Well, I will explain you what is the point of this two-round burst mode on this weapon; the AN-94 is chambered for the 5.45x39 mm, aka " Poison Bullet " because the factor of lethality of this round is very high for its category, however, this one is made for body kill, not for armor piercing, that's why the AN-94 has a two-round burst mode which able the rate of fire climb up to 1800 rds/min, allowing the two shots to hit the same point in order to pierce body-armor.
xPBTx 3 months ago
@xPBTx u know, thats exactly why i thought it fired 2 rounds at 1800 rds/min so they can hit one after the other at the same spot to pierce armor :), but now u confirmed it for me ;)
xxxCRAZYLOVExxx 3 months ago
Comment removed
imalchanaka 5 months ago
Comment removed
imalchanaka 5 months ago
Enamoev, I was wondering....WHen it says "3/10" , do you mean the rating or score of the gun?
kissmyasssuckers 6 months ago
@kissmyasssuckers it means 3rd vid out of 10 that i have posted of Izhmash weaponry!;)
enamoev 6 months ago
@enamoev Ahh!!! I noticed after visiting your channel! xD Kinda stupid of me xD ...Thank you for uploading these videos of these awesome weapons! :D AN-94 is my favorite! It's really brilliant!
kissmyasssuckers 6 months ago
@kissmyasssuckers u noob lol, its the third video
xxxCRAZYLOVExxx 1 week ago in playlist Favorite videos
@xxxCRAZYLOVExxx So did the uploader say, asshole.
kissmyasssuckers 1 week ago
@kissmyasssuckers dont get mad bro, was just teasing you, nice name btw lol
xxxCRAZYLOVExxx 1 week ago
@xxxCRAZYLOVExxx uh huh...? Yeah, my name is the living proof of no creativity at the time I made the channel. :P
kissmyasssuckers 1 week ago
2-round burst! So awesome!
I love 2-round burst.
SwaffyX 6 months ago
a higher fire rate then an MG3 is hard to believe
Xistanceowner 7 months ago
@Xistanceowner Only in two-round burst mode which is 1800 rounds/min, in auto mode it has 600 rounds/min.
xPBTx 6 months ago
its unique model of gun not for export by Izmash
SlavaSvarogu 7 months ago
Izemesh wouldn't let me see all the insides :( Their spokesman was an asshole. I want to take this thing apart! How does this BBSP system work?!?!
gaijinmodoki 7 months ago
is it more accurate at long distances than the ak-47?
1978atcarroll 7 months ago
@1978atcarroll yes,you can say AN-94,,Abakan,,its just perfect AK-47
SlavaSvarogu 7 months ago
@1978atcarroll The narrator just said that it surpasses all other modern firearms in accuracy while shooting from unstable positions, that means in stable positions it is even more accurate.
Unit987654321 6 months ago
@1978atcarroll yes of course its more accurate... not only cuz of the system but of the caliber too! the 5.45x39... <<< used in Ak-74 is better in characteristics than the 7.62x39... <<< used in Ak-47...
this gun is not only more accurate than the 47 its most accurate to my opinion... in range of 200 meters or so the 2 bullets hit the same spot! the reason for it was to penetrate body armor... just so everyone knows... cuz people just yap saying its pointless!
enamoev 6 months ago 6
@enamoev It seems to be a damn good weapon, from what I've seen. I'm still undecided about whether or not it surpasses the M-16, though. (maybe I'm biased, being American).
1978atcarroll 6 months ago
@enamoev That two round burst function is amazing! I hope I live to see the day when civilians can purchase a version of the Nikonov Assault rifle (though I'm doubtful). This is likely to be my favorite dream gun of all time, along with the AEK-971. I would love to see the Nikonov in action with a sound suppressor instead of the advanced flash/recoil dampener, although I'm not sure how a silencer would fare with a recoiling barrel and two round burst. But nothing is impossible!
imiritu 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@enamoev That two round burst function is amazing! I hope I live to see the day when civilians can purchase a version of the Nikonov Assault rifle (though I'm doubtful). This is likely to be my favorite dream gun of all time, along with the AEK-971. I would love to see the Nikonov in action with a sound suppressor instead of the advanced flash/recoil dampener, although I'm not sure how a silencer would fare with a recoiling barrel and two round burst. But nothing is impossible!
imiritu 4 months ago
watta a friggin awesome gun =D
7h3n00b7ha7pwn5 8 months ago
this weapon is just like the m16 from russia,its awesome,but jams like hell and the fiability is very bad.
linuxpowerification 8 months ago
@linuxpowerification where did you found that info ?
13thmistral 7 months ago
@linuxpowerification whata whata what? is just like an m-16??? how is it like an m-16 please describe!!!!!!?
enamoev 7 months ago
@enamoev
are you fucking retarded? im talking about reliability,its junk just like the M16.
linuxpowerification 7 months ago
@linuxpowerification lol u r the freaking retard by comparing this gun to any other gun in reliability...
have u shot the gun? have u been in the battle with the gun? how the fuck can u know what this gun is capable of? its like when some dickheads r saying AK variants r not reliable... but in all they know nothing about them! say something smarter...
enamoev 7 months ago
@enamoev
here it comes the retardness... take your head out of your ass,or better put that gun up your ass and shoot.Like i would waste my time with you talking about something that is made to kill other people -.-
linuxpowerification 7 months ago
@linuxpowerification 1st of all guns dont kill people... people do! ever heard of this phrase dumb fuck? im talking about this gun not as a people killer but as a working mechanism... if u r being fed shit it doenst mean u can feed shit to others... keep ur shit ur self! and 2nd of all id bitch slap ur ass like a lil cunt for talking tough on here... winkstain;))
enamoev 7 months ago
@enamoev
oohh dont give that crap psycho
linuxpowerification 7 months ago
@linuxpowerification ))))))))
enamoev 7 months ago
@linuxpowerification
Guns are made to save lives. It is bad people who use them to kill people. Just as a steak knife is used to cut steak, but some use them to stab folks.
BorislavX 7 months ago
@enamoev
Where do i get one?!
BorislavX 7 months ago
@linuxpowerification
LWRC > all
BorislavX 7 months ago
R.I.P. Gennady Nikonov ...
xPBTx 9 months ago
gimmick gun
GR3B3N 10 months ago
@GR3B3N hardly. when you fire a 3 round burst it feels like only one round and that is great for kill shots
padrinoel 8 months ago
@padrinoel it's shooting 2 round bursts
GR3B3N 8 months ago
@GR3B3N you can change that
TheGreenday0321 8 months ago
If only there were an airsoft version.
toni92768 10 months ago 8
Excellent for special forces...but it costs too much for your average soldier to be equipped with it.
AndyHanturd 11 months ago
In the capitalist USA people are plants
SibTender 11 months ago
nice weapon
weedcelso 1 year ago
best assault rifle I have ever seen. I wonder if it could be transformed into a light machine gun. did the guy in the video say 1800 rpm???
rjrichar 1 year ago
@rjrichar have you ever fired one? or even actually physically seen one?
imiritu 1 year ago
@rjrichar Did. It hoever applies only to double shot mode - all the shooting in this video is actually the double shot mode, not singleshots althru it looks and almost sounds as such. The rifle is said to cost five times the price of AK74, and for all the complicatedness of its design it offers little advantage, so the whole design is dubious (no mater how interesting it is). It is said to be used by special forces, but IMHO thats just PR.
DudeNumberOnePlus 1 year ago
@rjrichar Yes, It has a maximum rate of fire at 1800 RPM but only when firing the two-round burst.
durgymp 11 months ago
@rjrichar well, it is as it can go fullauto
harris3693 8 months ago
in soviet russia, guns fire you.
pianoxtreme 1 year ago
Does anyone actually know how effective the blow back shifted pulse technology is against body armor?
MephistonVMS 1 year ago
GET OUT OF HERE STALKER!
Ive heard this weapon is extremely unreliable compared to the Ak 74.
kop4321 1 year ago
@kop4321 anything is unreliable compared to an ak
spritegamer 1 year ago
@spritegamer Mosin Nagant beats it.
AdmiralGST 1 year ago
@kop4321 It utilizes a very complicated feed mechanism with small tolerances, so yes, you heard right. It is too expensive for general military use (5-6 times the price of a new AK-74), so no worries there.
DamazViccar 1 year ago
@DamazViccar And considering Russia has a conscript army, not smart to make it standard issue. But, its a leap forward in to small army technology.
kop4321 1 year ago
love this gun too much, have a style and poweful...I only choose this gun in BAD COMPANY 2....
GUNDAMZGOK 1 year ago
@GUNDAMZGOK Please, stop with these video game comments. Really, it is sick that hose MW2 fags already spammed their stupid ''knowledge'' about guns in other gun videos.
realIBeliX 1 year ago
this was made for muzziez. simply one of the best.
pimpleasy 1 year ago
sigh.. what a brilliant weapon.... typical izmash quality weapons.
yalefail 1 year ago
@BadCaseofFuck its 5.45x39 in the states its called a .22
mishgun420 1 year ago
@mishgun420
no.
.22 - 5.6 mm
mechdog 1 year ago
@mechdog ok then whats the 5.45 in the states?
mishgun420 1 year ago
@mishgun420 5.45x39...
e115x525 1 year ago
Comment removed
purplecurtisimo 1 year ago
@mishgun420 LOL it's called 5.45x39 everywhere else. the U.S. seems stuck in its old "my way or the high way" style that they used in the cold war era.
purplecurtisimo 1 year ago 3
@purplecurtisimo i realize that the entire world uses the metric system (besides America) and its much simpler then the american system, but i live in the states so i'm stuck using inches and feet :)
mishgun420 1 year ago 3
@mishgun420 You could un-stick yourself by using a revolutionary invention... it's called a calculator.
YoungGun243 3 months ago
@YoungGun243 dont need no calculator i can do the math in my head when needed
mishgun420 3 months ago
@mishgun420 Its smaller than a .22, I have the proof in front of me.
AdmiralGST 1 year ago
i looooove this gun .you people who thinks this gun is ugly,well u aint got no style
pkmgz 1 year ago
They say the design is more complex and unreliable than the AK line.
The AN94 has only been produced in small numbers and may never be supplied to the whole army.
In chechnya the spetsnaz went back to the (7.62) AK's
762full 1 year ago
That sliding barrel assembly is my idea.
LER77 1 year ago
An94 beast in bc2
Vernon682 1 year ago
i don't see why people think its ugly. personally i think its a sexy beast. 2 round burst recoil reducing barrel!?!
afrofin1 1 year ago
I'd Like to have a shoot with one of them any day of the week.....
MrMakk001 1 year ago
Accurate, Lightweight, Modifyable, Powerful, Accurate. A great weapon.
Catfood4Kids 1 year ago
They dont have an-94 in all call of duty series..haha.fail..i love Battlefield bad company. .
nil1230 1 year ago
@nil1230 this weapons sucks monkey balls in metal gear solid 4
stevengood12 1 year ago
@stevengood12 uh.... and why?
Kuwaga1 1 year ago
@Kuwaga1 the acerecy, damage, the sights look retarted, not a gun for mgs4
stevengood12 1 year ago
however...russian guns are awesome and the ak74 is one of my favorites... but most russian guns are really really really ugly
Askarion 1 year ago
@Askarion They dont really have to win a beauty contest, do they? xD
The looks are a matter of preference, highly subjective imo. What looks ugly to you might look great to others.
Buuub08 1 year ago
5.56x45 has the benefit of commercial loadings and better bullet construction. otherwise 5.45 and 5.56 are near identical in their external ballistics (most ballistic charts of 5.56 are from a 20" barrel) hornady is close to releasing their 5.45 vmax and it fragments pretty good from looking their gel tests. as far as mil-spec 5.45 goes.. it doesn't fragment, but it does begin to yaw very quickly.. not as lethal as fragmenting but still creates wound channels which are difficult to treat/probe
TX1790 1 year ago
Best gun !
5efyue 1 year ago
@jmk0309 thats why the russians had to downgrade to a smaller caliber.. 5.45 in the ak-74.. because of the ballistics, size. and what the bullets are made of, is what makes them more dangerous. 7.62 goes in, and threw, while the 5.56 goes inside of the body, splits and creates a heck of a mess. the reason they downgraded on size, is because not only is the 5.56 deadly accurate, but it is also more practical, and lethal.
paulbabbitt 1 year ago
just watching this makes me wanna pwn noobs in BFBC2 with this gun lol
richrocks95 1 year ago
I would choose the H&K G3 over any weapon on this planet. I'm sorry, but 5.56 just doesn't cut it when you shoot to kill. None of this shoot and wound soft garbage, because the terrorists sure don't care with bombs strapped on their chests. You must remember the terrorists in Iraq today are usually high on a drug, so I would much rather hit them once or twice with a 7.62, or you can go the 5.56 route and hit them 4-5 times before the target is dead. Your choice.
jmk0309 1 year ago
@jmk0309 What makes you think one or two hits from a 7.62 would do the trick?
varanid9 1 year ago
@jmk0309 this is 5.45... much deadlier than 5.56. besides, these days if you put a guy in a coma, he's more of a liability than another corpse.
purplecurtisimo 1 year ago
@purplecurtisimo
Please do your research, Dr. Fackler's ballistic study conclusively proved the 5.56 is the superior wounding round of the two.
Sephirius 1 year ago
@jmk0309 or just a solid round in the head would do the trick
funkytownchannel 1 year ago
@jmk0309
people have survived .50 bmg hits... point is, it's all about shot placement... otherwise you're arguing about which round will make you more dead... pretty moot point imo.
TX1790 1 year ago
this gun is so awesome i want one
crash6917 1 year ago
To be honest I like balanced gas system better then shifted pulse one. Simpler and no doubt almost equally effective and cheaper to make as well. Easier to understand too. AK-107/108 and AEK-971/972/973 are very stable weapons too.
Spetsnazovets 1 year ago
the best weapons!!!
MeneTPhoenix 1 year ago
When is Russia going to learn that low power cartridges were a mistake? US operators (and I'd assume their NATO counterparts) are dropping 5.56 for 6.8 SPC and 7.62 NATO No doubt Russia needs an improved round over the 7.62x39 because it's not terribly accurate, but they shouldn't accept higher accuracy at the cost of lesser stopping power. I'd almost guarantee when the US gets around to updating it's rifles (after the Iraq disaster is ended) it'll fire a heavier round.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 "US operators are dropping 5.56 for 6.8 SPC and 7.62 NATO" Bullshit.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9
Yeah, you don't know what you're talking about. Technically no rifle will fire full of water. Water doesn't compress, so a piston system won't be able to cycle with a rifle full of water. Rifles like the HK 416/417 and LWRC's range are meant to drain completely in about a second. An AK-47 will not drain so rapidly. Why don't you do the over the beach test with an AK-47/AKM and fire it after letting it drain approximately one second?
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 an AK drains fast enough.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 Why do you think the XM8 died a quick death? One of the reasons was it was 5.56. The US Army and Marines have produced very good marksmen. Guys that can hit targets beyond 400m with iron sights and out significantly further with something like an ACOG. Eventually some bullet bigger than 5.56mm but smaller than 7.62mm is going to become standard. It's just not going to be anytime soon since the US is dead broke from two wars.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 The XM8's death wasn't particularly "quick", and it had nothing to do with being a 5.56. The next service round will probably be less than 5mm.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 Sub 5mm projectiles? Why would you even think this. 5.56mm doesn't have the stopping power, the range, or the penetration for current operational requirements so why would the DoD want an even smaller, less powerful cartridge? They wouldn't. Everything that's been learned from the last ten years or so points to a new catridge in the same catagory as 6.8 SPC, .280 British, or 7.62x39. Something along those lines, bigger than 5.56 and smaller than 7.62 NATO.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 Currently, the army is getting good results with heavy grain 5.56 bullets. Still doesn't have the range of .30 or 6.8, but most troops don't need it anyway (Afghanistan the exception cuz mountain and open terrain), anyway, "stopping power" is a myth. Statistically, .30 rounds also had many people recieve multiple shots and still recover, gun-geek magazine articles notwithstanding. Future infantry weapons seem to be going to high velocity sub-5mm projectiles (HK G-11 caseless ammo
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 The G11 was cancelled one, two it was designed during the Cold War. Cold War ballistics theory was all for smaller, faster rounds. Rifle engagements were to happen at short range while more powerful weapons (mortars, artillery) would destroy infantry at long range. What we 'learned' about ballistics in the Cold War is being unlearned now.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 The G11 was cancelled because the Bundeswehr couldn't justify the cost of such an expensive new weapons system when the fall of the GDR left so many unused AKs in their possession, while it seemed the Soviets were no longer such a threat. They were actually on the verge of perfecting it, the only issue remaining being one of overheating on extended full-auto fire.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 Do you know what happens with caseless ammo when a gun overheats? It's a lot more dramatic than when a traditional gun overheats. They did play around with some higher temperature propellents, but this problem still haunts caseless weapons designers to this day.
So many unused AKs? No, they dropped the G11 for the more conventional G36.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 The AKs are in storage for issue in case of emergency, I know the G11 overheats, the project was killed, though last I heard, german SPECOPs still had them in inventory (they may no longer). It is just a matter of time before it is perfected, like everything else.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 .30 rounds? What do you mean? 30-30? ..30-03? .300 Winchester Mag? .303 British? .300 Lapua Magnum? I'm guessing that you mean .30 carbine, in which case a very similar round in theory to 5.56mm. Basically a low powered cartridge with little recoil and little stopping power. You really need to pay attention to the other mm designation in rounds. I.E. 7.62x51mm, 7.62x63mm catridges (.308 Winchester and 30-06 Springfield) pack a lot more punch than something like 7.62x39mm.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 I meant .30 as in it really doesn't matter....most military issue FMJ zips through its target unless it happens to hit a few key spots of the body. The more powerful the round, the more energy it wastes beyond the target.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 Oh, and Paul Howe doesn't think the lack of lethality is a myth. Maybe you should read what he has to say about it.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 And maybe you need to quit reading and go do.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 Maybe you should. I've fired quite a few rounds in my day. No, I was not in the Army, no I am not an 'arm chair Barney Fife'. The Army isn't too willing to take you if you have had two ACL ruptures and metal in your hand. That said, at least I'm not some 14-year-old brat that pretends I'm some legendary operator. I'm just someone who is interested in and knows a lot about the science of killing people. A subject you have much to learn about.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 I have, I've been in the military and law enforcement. I still have a close circle of military that actually does the room entries in Iraq, not truck drivers and prison guards. Also, I study real world surveys of shootings, not gun magazine hype. You may not be a 14 year old brat, but you sound just like one.
varanid9 1 year ago
@Nater245689 Being a "killing scientist" that has never killed anybody is the same as being a chemist that has never mixed chemicals. They just repeat stuff that they read and take it as fact when for all they know it could be false information.
Tippet76 1 year ago
@Tippet76 Yeah, sure it is. You're a fool. How many did Oppenheimer kill? Most of the people who design weapons aren't soldiers.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Tippet76 John Garand, John Browning. They were never soldiers, yet they build some of the best firearms in history. As for Varnid's arguments, they're kinda hard to reason with when you see more guys carrying heavier caliber rifles into battle. But, he's just some 14-year-old Warsaw Pact fanboy who trolls Youtube. What can you expect?
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 Also, electro-magnetic rifles and hand-held railguns also use sub-5mm rounds, and though I could be wrong on my next statement, I believe the "metalstorm" experiments are going more towards smaller, faster projectiles.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 Hand-held rail guns? You just proved that you don't know anything. There are no hand held rail guns, there won't be for some time. The only 'rail guns' around are the size of a building and suck huge amounts of electricity. They have capacitor banks that would will dump trucks. They have to be rebuilt every few shots. The only field ready products from Metal Storm is a triple shot, semi-automatic under barrel grenade launcher. Your knowledge of weapons comes from video games.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 No, perhaps you should get your info from something other than magazine articles. Hand-held rail rifles have been experimented on since the 90s, but key word, experimental....so far. You can see solid projectile metalstorms on the history channel, for god's sake.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 Wow, you've just proven your ignorance. Metal Storm isn't a 'rail gun'. It still uses powder just like a conventional firearm. The difference being the charge is ignited with an electrical pulse instead of a firing pin. Now you also could be mistaking coil guns for rail guns. Single stage coil guns have been made, but you'd need a multi-stage to do any damage and they are still very large. Maybe you should get some information, period.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 Never said Metalstorm was a railgun. You're right about me confusing the coil gun with a railgun, though. Gee, such terrible ignorance.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 Anything smaller than 5mm would be too ineffective.
jmk0309 1 year ago
The M-16 is not as reliable as the classic AK.
elmusulman1431 1 year ago
@elmusulman1431
If you're talking about the old-style direct impingement rifles, you are correct. If you're talking about the new short stroke gas piston rifles for Barrett, LWRC, and HK; you're dead wrong. I've seen the LWRC and HK rifles fired when full of mud, sand, and even water. If you tried to fire an AK full of water, it'd blow up in your face.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 "If you tried to fire an AK full of water, it'd blow up in your face." Bullshit.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9 Yeah, that's why SOCOM itself requested the development of the 6.8 cartridge and rifle manufacturers like LWRC have received request after request for AR-pattern rifles in 7.62mm with barrel lengths ranging from 12 to 24 inches.
6.8 SPC was developed because US operators can shoot far beyond the effective range of the 5.55NATO round, even it's hotter Mk.262 variant. Even regular troops can now shoot beyond the effective range of 5.56 NATO.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 The 6.8 is dead in the water. .All these "requests" are mostly from Barney Fife armchair warriors who've never fired a shot in anger.
varanid9 1 year ago
@varanid9. What are you, 14? You make immature comments on weapons and karate (you have to spar with protection to prevent brain injury). If you fully submerged and AK47/AKM/AK-74 you'd have to spend considerable time draining it. You'd have to take the magazine out, open the bolt, and drain it for at least a minute. It's not going to drain in one second. They can take mud, sand, whatever. They don't do well full of water because that takes a lot of specific engineering.
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 well acctully for ure information theres video on youtube of someone firing an ak that was just in water it only takes 2 or 3 secs to drain, the ak, like most Russian guns, has incredible reliability.
tayatay5 1 year ago
@tayatay5 3 seconds vs. >1 second is a big difference. The time it takes to pop out of the water, acquire a target, and shoot is around one second. If you had to wait three seconds, you'd be exposed to god knows what. for more than two seconds longer. Which would you rather have?
Nater245689 1 year ago
@Nater245689 You talk like an armchair barney fife. Let me guess....you've already proven your ignorance of reality with phrases like "stopping power", and the assumption that 5.56 is somehow a pimple-popper....I bet you also think that fast handgun magazine changes are a really big deal, don't you?
varanid9 1 year ago