If we believe what they tell us we might as well write a new set of physics books while were at it. The kind of reaction that causes concrete and steel to turn to dust comes at an atomic level.
What we fail to comprehend to this day is the enourmous cauldron of molten steel under every structure that lasted up to a month after and the numerous cancer deaths from first responders to date. I have only found one shocking and plausible explanation. Find Dimitri Kahlezov full vid and LISTEN !!
People just dont WANT belive what they see, only what politician tell them. World goes on WW3. 9/11 was only one part in this game. Still I cant stop wonder, how humans are so blind
@MrJulli74 Scratch ´politicians´, fill in ´mass-media´. Just like they believe the evolution theory. The answer is as simple as it has always been: people believe what they want to be true. Most don´t care about the truth. Sad but true.
@lapmarty sorry about your friends, especially since they were doing really unthankful work. i clean shit up as well, but nothing on this scale. it pisses me off that they were sent into an obviously unhealthy situation when "the powers" knew better. your compadre's illnesses are certainly proof that something more than jet fuel was at work that hideous day, but i'll leave it to others to parse out, or cover up.
what you do is a shame, for all of those who gave their life for this, you use little anecdotal evidence, video mainly and picture but failed to go at the source, go tak to the trick driver that day after day howled that shit, go talk to the people who spend 40 hours a week cutting steel colums for months, go do a real investigation and then come back here with your stupid theory of energy weapon turning steel into dust,
@lapmarty You're a nutter! I should be ashamed for trying to understand what happened?? Then the list you sum up.. What ARE you talking about? You have NO IDEA how I feel sorry for every common man and woman unwillingly involved in this mess. YOU should be ashamed for even doubting my sincerity!! DO you know me even a little bit? Go research Judy Wood for some ´little anecdotal evidence´ and stop bothering people who have serious questions about VERY serious matter.
@EdjeBos You put those video without even checking the fact, go check what happend to the steel, you are the morons that show a bit of dust hovering for a second in the air and asking people to beleive a energy beam that would require many time the entire energy produce on earth turn a building that was already collapsing into dust, but then thosand of people have seen that steel on ground, they have howled it in their truck, your not a truther, you are a nut, using those video to get hit, shame
@lapmarty Not to mention 500 miles of steel girders that composed the support structure of the WTC Towers. Show me even photographic or video evidence of 500 miles worth of steel beams.
@lapmarty. What is your theory on Where the buidlings went? They didnt go down basement was empty, except for people alive! Wasnt any rubble or debris left...where did they go? Yea thats right. fume, call names, repeat phoney cause lines....let me ask you a question though.
@lapmarty. You seem to believe you are a smart guy.....What is the result of the Trillions of dollars spent in military "black projects?" A better gun? IF you say the Active Denial System you would have a point. And that is a siniliar technology that could cause a building to turn to powder. Your problem is not with Judy Wood it is with the facts. You cant accept that there is something going on that you cant fit into your current paraidgm. Your square mind box cant accept a round idea.
i know personaly people who have died following working years at ground zero, from cancer, they were there everyday, this is real life not conspiracy shit, wake up man, do you really think all those guys were on it, they didnt report anything strange about the steel, in fact they report there was massive amount of steel for a long time, they had to cut it, howled it, they wouldve know if a laser beam turn that into dust before it it the floor, but you conspirationist nuts ignore that
the amount of energy in building like that is amaxingly hight, its 110 stories, i really think you should go read a bit and educate yourself on the matter, i use to beleive in a conspiracy but after much reading,about the fact, i can see clearly now,
Give me a photo with stacks of floors and I'll remove the vid. Deal?
well i dont know what is your assertation, pankake collapse dont mean your gonna find floor afterward, evrething broke on the way down, in many pieces,
@lapmarty Actually, pancake-collapse DOES mean that a stack of floors remains. That's how they came up with the term!! And you read? What, Donald Duck magazine? The photo´s you send me I have seen loads of times and yes, they show (only!!!) some steel bars. A mere fraction of what was used in these buildings. Sorry bro, you goggles are fogged up by the dust. A good excuse, because tháts what they turned into. So they just collapsed, did they? Then WHERE IS THE CONCRETE!!!!!
@EdjeBos first you were wrong about the basement showing in picture,sure dont admit it, pancake collapse is a term to explain the mecanics behind the collapse, you see it on video millions of time, the top of the building is pull down with is weight toward the bottom by his own weight, are you stupid not to see that? did we see a giant beam of energy transforming the 2 tower in dust, or did we see a burning damage building collapse from the top to the bottom turning concrete in dust is normal
do some research, the twin tower use approximaly 200000 tons of steel, the worker on ground zero howled 17 000 of debris daily, what do you think all those people were doing down there,?? man you make no sence, you can trace back 185 000 ofsteel to differentcompagny,24 tons went into a ship, and about
im sure you could track the 15 000 othe tons if you bother, some are here jfk storage of fbi in the end your energy beam turn what 3 steel pole into dust big deal that is so stupid, judy wood ha
yes we really do see two twoer turning into dust because a big invisible energy beam hit them, and they also use two holographic airplane, planted airplane pieces on ground zero, also body part from the plane passenger, in all over tenth of thosand of body pieces were found, and still today, your stupidity goes beyond loose change, at less they didnt invented a non existent technology to support the theory of a crack pot phd lady that didnt even look at one steel collum from the wtc,
the amount of energy in building like that is amaxingly hight, its 110 stories, i really think you should go read a bit and educate yourself on the matter, i use to beleive in a conspiracy but after much reading,about the fact, i can see clearly now,
first did you go to debunking 911 myth, i suggest you go there and read a bit,
the mecanic of the collapse is explain, this high energy stuff come from judy wood, and she is well known to be a bad researcher that didnt even examine any of the physical evidence, she use video and photo to base ``her science`:`method, you cant go on a case like this with only picture and video,
Why don't you see huge piles of concrete?well lots of concrete did turn into dust, no mystery there this is concrete
are you serious, cant you tell, even without a phd that the dust and smoke on it is floating in air when it fall before disipating?? my god that is stupid,
@lapmarty I can tell and yes, I'm dead serious. Tell me, if stuff didn't desintegrate, why do photo's shot right after the event show a clear view of the basements? Why don't you see huge piles of concrete? How big were those buildings? How much concrete went into making them? Pancake collapse?? The name is chosen because of the stack of floors you see with it. Not in this case bud. Give me a photo with stacks of floors and I'll remove the vid. Deal?
The first atomic bomb was detonated in the desert atop a 75 foot steel tower. 63/100 of a second after detonation, the steel tower the bomb was sitting on had VAPORIZED. That is to say, as the core temperature of the bomb became close to that of the surface of the sun, the tower turned to a liquid, then a gas. That's the kind of energy required to cause that kind of disintegration. There is no sign of that kind of force being unleashed here..
@freecanadianguy 'That's the kind of energy required'. As far as we know. There could be other kinds of energy we don't know about. I agree that that kind of energy was not used here. But it disintegrates none the less. I can see it crumble to dust. The question remains: how is that possible? I believe they could possess technologies not known to the public. Compare this with the aerial photo of the WTC-complex taken in the afternoon on 9/11. You can look straight into the basements. No piles.
• What you are seeing is a huge chunk of the metal facade fall away, leaving the dust and debris that has collected on it, to remain stationary due to the fact it's just dust, to blow away. You can clearly see the column begin to fall away just before it is obscured by the dust it leaves behind. As the dust disapates in the air around it, taa-daaa!! the column is no longer there! It's magic ! Pick a card, any card.....
0 kelvin = 273 c that is the neutral point and matter breaks to dust .. it cant be colder .. but to use it as a reaction or a weapon on this scale i think that it is not so strange that even firefighters where jumping even
i
i am just giving my example and i am not an expert
but if
i think if you let a albert einstein withis talent and nicolas tesla work togettter what
@dennisjo88 You are right. That's it! We just don't know. I don't know if this has anything to do with tempurature. Maybe there are other techniques with similar results that we don't know about, but is known to some people and kept secret. I don't know anything really. I don't claim to. I just believe my eyes when I see two buidlings of that size just blow away like that, leaving nothing but gaping holes. A free view of the basements. Nothing but the Hutchington-effect makes sense imo, so far.
@infoseeker264 Yup! Couple that with the holes left where moments before stood two of the largest buildings in the world. This is imo the only thing that makes sense of that. Both buildings left the scene of the crime in one big dustcloud. You tell me how this can happen..
@yurthammer You look but just don't see. Have you looked at the Hutchison video material yet? This will be my last attemps. I'm not trying to be 'right'. I'm not calling you stupid or anything (unlike yourself..). I just hope you may come to understand how far the US is in their technologies. Nobody has a doubt they are much farther then people know. What they tell us tomorrow is 20 years old for them. Watch this (or don't, I don't care): user/AnonymousTruther#p/c/34C2E8B79F1BFABA/0/nCwiLGQxE9E
@yurthammer When you look at the images, you don't see a building collapsing, you see a dustcloud settling. That's why you at first see the top of one of the towers toppling over. then just dissapearing in a cloud of dust. It should have just continued on falling. Believe me, I thought this was BS at first too. But when you objectively look at it all, what you see just doesn't make sense. Try it.
@yurthammer Yep, you're right. Silly me, what was I thinking, 90% of two buildings was airborne because of explosions. That must have ment that every 2 square ft was rigged with explosives. And nobody ever noticed anything.. You're right. Nothing out of the ordinary at all. So, 4" thick huh.. And um, how many floors were there again? No debrispiles and holes in basements are easy explained by.. How did you do this again?
"That must have ment that every 2 square ft was rigged with explosives."
Whatever you say troofie.
Its not as if a 30000 ton piledriver of collapsing building( I think thats a rough weight estimate of the upper block in wtc1) would be likely to break up drywall and 4" thick concrete floorpans below.
I mean those things were built for that kind of force hitting them arent they?
@yurthammer I see from your other comments that you're really a man of the world. You've seen it all, no one can tell you anything, can they. You don't believe in the NWO as well. You probably are convinced planes flew into the towers and the Pentagon. You've seen it on TV, so that is a fact, right? Well, you better grap yourself a Duff and park yourself in front of one again, before you're 'out of the loop'. Have a nice life.
@yurthammer Ah! Someone who doesn't believe his eyes! And fast with the insults! You must be a great thinker..
What you see is a piece of steel. The towers were surrounded by large beams of class-A steel. If you look closely, you will see it never reaches the ground. The other vid is more clear (upper related vids). But don't believe me, believe your eyes. Have a better explanation for two of the worlds largest buildings turning to almost nothing but dust? Let's hear it then..
@yurthammer If it isn't, it's not helping your case. The inner columns were much bigger, stronger. Yet it pulverizes before your very eyes. And try arguing without insults. Makes you appear older then 12..
@yurthammer Actually seen the debrisfield moments after the ´pancake-collapse´? Where´s the stack? Try looking for it here:
watch?v=709opQ7tyFM
from 3:47 to 4:00 for a birds-eye view and from 6:10 to 7:10 for a GROUND LEVEL view. If this is possible in your world, tell me how. TWO of the largest buildings of the world. Do you see a pile of some sort? Should be two big ones, no?
Can't wait for the debunkers to come along to work on this... should be entertaining.
It will go something like this: The ground caved in below this visible steel structure due to other debris landing. "The structure then accelerated, intact, quickly to the ground. This could not be clearly seen as the dust coating it before it fell was left behind in a cloud, masking its descent" etc. etc.....
This may also be accompanied by one of the usual nutjob-type insults.
If we believe what they tell us we might as well write a new set of physics books while were at it. The kind of reaction that causes concrete and steel to turn to dust comes at an atomic level.
What we fail to comprehend to this day is the enourmous cauldron of molten steel under every structure that lasted up to a month after and the numerous cancer deaths from first responders to date. I have only found one shocking and plausible explanation. Find Dimitri Kahlezov full vid and LISTEN !!
djcolourzone 3 days ago
People just dont WANT belive what they see, only what politician tell them. World goes on WW3. 9/11 was only one part in this game. Still I cant stop wonder, how humans are so blind
MrJulli74 3 weeks ago
@MrJulli74 Scratch ´politicians´, fill in ´mass-media´. Just like they believe the evolution theory. The answer is as simple as it has always been: people believe what they want to be true. Most don´t care about the truth. Sad but true.
EdjeBos 3 weeks ago
lapmarty flunked spelling, science, physics and mathematics.
NFLWINNERS 3 months ago
@lapmarty sorry about your friends, especially since they were doing really unthankful work. i clean shit up as well, but nothing on this scale. it pisses me off that they were sent into an obviously unhealthy situation when "the powers" knew better. your compadre's illnesses are certainly proof that something more than jet fuel was at work that hideous day, but i'll leave it to others to parse out, or cover up.
vinetwiner 3 months ago
what you do is a shame, for all of those who gave their life for this, you use little anecdotal evidence, video mainly and picture but failed to go at the source, go tak to the trick driver that day after day howled that shit, go talk to the people who spend 40 hours a week cutting steel colums for months, go do a real investigation and then come back here with your stupid theory of energy weapon turning steel into dust,
lapmarty 3 months ago
@lapmarty You're a nutter! I should be ashamed for trying to understand what happened?? Then the list you sum up.. What ARE you talking about? You have NO IDEA how I feel sorry for every common man and woman unwillingly involved in this mess. YOU should be ashamed for even doubting my sincerity!! DO you know me even a little bit? Go research Judy Wood for some ´little anecdotal evidence´ and stop bothering people who have serious questions about VERY serious matter.
EdjeBos 3 months ago
@EdjeBos You put those video without even checking the fact, go check what happend to the steel, you are the morons that show a bit of dust hovering for a second in the air and asking people to beleive a energy beam that would require many time the entire energy produce on earth turn a building that was already collapsing into dust, but then thosand of people have seen that steel on ground, they have howled it in their truck, your not a truther, you are a nut, using those video to get hit, shame
lapmarty 3 months ago
@lapmarty Not to mention 500 miles of steel girders that composed the support structure of the WTC Towers. Show me even photographic or video evidence of 500 miles worth of steel beams.
TruthNBible 3 months ago
@lapmarty. What is your theory on Where the buidlings went? They didnt go down basement was empty, except for people alive! Wasnt any rubble or debris left...where did they go? Yea thats right. fume, call names, repeat phoney cause lines....let me ask you a question though.
TruthNBible 3 months ago
@lapmarty. You seem to believe you are a smart guy.....What is the result of the Trillions of dollars spent in military "black projects?" A better gun? IF you say the Active Denial System you would have a point. And that is a siniliar technology that could cause a building to turn to powder. Your problem is not with Judy Wood it is with the facts. You cant accept that there is something going on that you cant fit into your current paraidgm. Your square mind box cant accept a round idea.
TruthNBible 3 months ago
i know personaly people who have died following working years at ground zero, from cancer, they were there everyday, this is real life not conspiracy shit, wake up man, do you really think all those guys were on it, they didnt report anything strange about the steel, in fact they report there was massive amount of steel for a long time, they had to cut it, howled it, they wouldve know if a laser beam turn that into dust before it it the floor, but you conspirationist nuts ignore that
lapmarty 3 months ago
the amount of energy in building like that is amaxingly hight, its 110 stories, i really think you should go read a bit and educate yourself on the matter, i use to beleive in a conspiracy but after much reading,about the fact, i can see clearly now,
Give me a photo with stacks of floors and I'll remove the vid. Deal?
well i dont know what is your assertation, pankake collapse dont mean your gonna find floor afterward, evrething broke on the way down, in many pieces,
this make no sence
lapmarty 3 months ago
@lapmarty Actually, pancake-collapse DOES mean that a stack of floors remains. That's how they came up with the term!! And you read? What, Donald Duck magazine? The photo´s you send me I have seen loads of times and yes, they show (only!!!) some steel bars. A mere fraction of what was used in these buildings. Sorry bro, you goggles are fogged up by the dust. A good excuse, because tháts what they turned into. So they just collapsed, did they? Then WHERE IS THE CONCRETE!!!!!
EdjeBos 3 months ago
@EdjeBos first you were wrong about the basement showing in picture,sure dont admit it, pancake collapse is a term to explain the mecanics behind the collapse, you see it on video millions of time, the top of the building is pull down with is weight toward the bottom by his own weight, are you stupid not to see that? did we see a giant beam of energy transforming the 2 tower in dust, or did we see a burning damage building collapse from the top to the bottom turning concrete in dust is normal
lapmarty 3 months ago
do some research, the twin tower use approximaly 200000 tons of steel, the worker on ground zero howled 17 000 of debris daily, what do you think all those people were doing down there,?? man you make no sence, you can trace back 185 000 ofsteel to differentcompagny,24 tons went into a ship, and about
im sure you could track the 15 000 othe tons if you bother, some are here jfk storage of fbi in the end your energy beam turn what 3 steel pole into dust big deal that is so stupid, judy wood ha
lapmarty 3 months ago
yes we really do see two twoer turning into dust because a big invisible energy beam hit them, and they also use two holographic airplane, planted airplane pieces on ground zero, also body part from the plane passenger, in all over tenth of thosand of body pieces were found, and still today, your stupidity goes beyond loose change, at less they didnt invented a non existent technology to support the theory of a crack pot phd lady that didnt even look at one steel collum from the wtc,
lapmarty 3 months ago
the amount of energy in building like that is amaxingly hight, its 110 stories, i really think you should go read a bit and educate yourself on the matter, i use to beleive in a conspiracy but after much reading,about the fact, i can see clearly now,
lapmarty 3 months ago
first did you go to debunking 911 myth, i suggest you go there and read a bit,
the mecanic of the collapse is explain, this high energy stuff come from judy wood, and she is well known to be a bad researcher that didnt even examine any of the physical evidence, she use video and photo to base ``her science`:`method, you cant go on a case like this with only picture and video,
Why don't you see huge piles of concrete?well lots of concrete did turn into dust, no mystery there this is concrete
lapmarty 3 months ago
are you serious, cant you tell, even without a phd that the dust and smoke on it is floating in air when it fall before disipating?? my god that is stupid,
lapmarty 3 months ago
@lapmarty I can tell and yes, I'm dead serious. Tell me, if stuff didn't desintegrate, why do photo's shot right after the event show a clear view of the basements? Why don't you see huge piles of concrete? How big were those buildings? How much concrete went into making them? Pancake collapse?? The name is chosen because of the stack of floors you see with it. Not in this case bud. Give me a photo with stacks of floors and I'll remove the vid. Deal?
EdjeBos 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Debunker: The collapse of the BOTH Towers can be explained by the two massive planes crashing into them at 500 mph.
Logic: But, there was no plane impact on WTC7 and it collapsed in the same manner in secs.
Debunker: Uhhhhh, wait. that's different. It was debris from the North Tower that caused the collapse of WTC7.
Logic: But WTC6 was in between the North Tower and WTC7, was damaged more than WTC7 and never collapsed??
Debunker: I hate you meddling twoofers!!!
DARKREAPINGJUGGALO 6 months ago
The first atomic bomb was detonated in the desert atop a 75 foot steel tower. 63/100 of a second after detonation, the steel tower the bomb was sitting on had VAPORIZED. That is to say, as the core temperature of the bomb became close to that of the surface of the sun, the tower turned to a liquid, then a gas. That's the kind of energy required to cause that kind of disintegration. There is no sign of that kind of force being unleashed here..
freecanadianguy 10 months ago
@freecanadianguy 'That's the kind of energy required'. As far as we know. There could be other kinds of energy we don't know about. I agree that that kind of energy was not used here. But it disintegrates none the less. I can see it crumble to dust. The question remains: how is that possible? I believe they could possess technologies not known to the public. Compare this with the aerial photo of the WTC-complex taken in the afternoon on 9/11. You can look straight into the basements. No piles.
EdjeBos 10 months ago
@freecanadianguy THIS was done by Energy Directed Weapons. Check out research done by Dr Judy Woods.
dspitfireb 7 months ago
• What you are seeing is a huge chunk of the metal facade fall away, leaving the dust and debris that has collected on it, to remain stationary due to the fact it's just dust, to blow away. You can clearly see the column begin to fall away just before it is obscured by the dust it leaves behind. As the dust disapates in the air around it, taa-daaa!! the column is no longer there! It's magic ! Pick a card, any card.....
freecanadianguy 10 months ago
THINK! If it didn't turn to dust it would have fallen like a tree, but it went straight down 60 stories!!! INTO WHAT?
1971SuperLead 11 months ago
than you can say that 0 point energy . ===
0 kelvin = 273 c that is the neutral point and matter breaks to dust .. it cant be colder .. but to use it as a reaction or a weapon on this scale i think that it is not so strange that even firefighters where jumping even
i
i am just giving my example and i am not an expert
but if
i think if you let a albert einstein withis talent and nicolas tesla work togettter what
i dont no if it
dennisjo88 1 year ago
@dennisjo88 You are right. That's it! We just don't know. I don't know if this has anything to do with tempurature. Maybe there are other techniques with similar results that we don't know about, but is known to some people and kept secret. I don't know anything really. I don't claim to. I just believe my eyes when I see two buidlings of that size just blow away like that, leaving nothing but gaping holes. A free view of the basements. Nothing but the Hutchington-effect makes sense imo, so far.
EdjeBos 1 year ago
It sure looks like that steel Spire turned into dust. Amazing!!!
infoseeker264 1 year ago
@infoseeker264 Yup! Couple that with the holes left where moments before stood two of the largest buildings in the world. This is imo the only thing that makes sense of that. Both buildings left the scene of the crime in one big dustcloud. You tell me how this can happen..
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@EdjeBos
There are countless photos of mountains of steel mixed with concrete, maybe Judy doesnt want to show you them?
I wonder why, sheeple?
yurthammer 1 year ago
@yurthammer You look but just don't see. Have you looked at the Hutchison video material yet? This will be my last attemps. I'm not trying to be 'right'. I'm not calling you stupid or anything (unlike yourself..). I just hope you may come to understand how far the US is in their technologies. Nobody has a doubt they are much farther then people know. What they tell us tomorrow is 20 years old for them. Watch this (or don't, I don't care): user/AnonymousTruther#p/c/34C2E8B79F1BFABA/0/nCwiLGQxE9E
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@EdjeBos
Thats hilarious, if you watch other parts of Judys insane presentation, you can see vast amounts of steel all over the site.
Duh?
yurthammer 1 year ago
@yurthammer When you look at the images, you don't see a building collapsing, you see a dustcloud settling. That's why you at first see the top of one of the towers toppling over. then just dissapearing in a cloud of dust. It should have just continued on falling. Believe me, I thought this was BS at first too. But when you objectively look at it all, what you see just doesn't make sense. Try it.
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@EdjeBos
I wonder where all those 4" thick concrete floor pans and rack loads of drywall went?
You dont think they could have produced the dustcloud.?
Maybe they were extra special drywall and concrete that doesnt make dust when pulverised?
LOL.
yurthammer 1 year ago
@yurthammer Yep, you're right. Silly me, what was I thinking, 90% of two buildings was airborne because of explosions. That must have ment that every 2 square ft was rigged with explosives. And nobody ever noticed anything.. You're right. Nothing out of the ordinary at all. So, 4" thick huh.. And um, how many floors were there again? No debrispiles and holes in basements are easy explained by.. How did you do this again?
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@EdjeBos
"That must have ment that every 2 square ft was rigged with explosives."
Whatever you say troofie.
Its not as if a 30000 ton piledriver of collapsing building( I think thats a rough weight estimate of the upper block in wtc1) would be likely to break up drywall and 4" thick concrete floorpans below.
I mean those things were built for that kind of force hitting them arent they?
yurthammer 1 year ago
@yurthammer I see from your other comments that you're really a man of the world. You've seen it all, no one can tell you anything, can they. You don't believe in the NWO as well. You probably are convinced planes flew into the towers and the Pentagon. You've seen it on TV, so that is a fact, right? Well, you better grap yourself a Duff and park yourself in front of one again, before you're 'out of the loop'. Have a nice life.
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@EdjeBos
"You don't believe in the NWO as well"
I dont believe in your made up bogeyman organisation?
Thats correct.
Children believe in Bogeymen.
yurthammer 1 year ago
LOL.
Who would have thought that a skyscraper full of thin concrete floor pans and drywall would have produced a lot of dust when it collapsed.
Nah it must have been space weapons!!!
Fucking retards.
yurthammer 1 year ago
@yurthammer Ah! Someone who doesn't believe his eyes! And fast with the insults! You must be a great thinker..
What you see is a piece of steel. The towers were surrounded by large beams of class-A steel. If you look closely, you will see it never reaches the ground. The other vid is more clear (upper related vids). But don't believe me, believe your eyes. Have a better explanation for two of the worlds largest buildings turning to almost nothing but dust? Let's hear it then..
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@EdjeBos
LOL you cant even identify that section can you???
Its not the perimeter columns, fuckwit.
Try again.
yurthammer 1 year ago
@yurthammer If it isn't, it's not helping your case. The inner columns were much bigger, stronger. Yet it pulverizes before your very eyes. And try arguing without insults. Makes you appear older then 12..
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@EdjeBos
Its the core columns, or whats left of them, and they fall down and become obscured in the dust below.
Do things cease to exist in your world, when you cant see them anymore?
Are you fucking retarded?
yurthammer 1 year ago
@yurthammer why "fuckwit" and "retard"?????????? a case of cognitive dissonance maybe. Google the term if you want to know what that means.
souplovesongs 1 year ago
@souplovesongs Don't bother with this guy. You see what garbage he spills. By the way, I googled the term.. Nice one! :)
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@souplovesongs Don't bother with this guy. You see what garbage he spills. By the way, I googled the term.. Nice one! :)
EdjeBos 1 year ago
@EdjeBos
"Have a better explanation for two of the worlds largest buildings turning to almost nothing but dust?"
LOLOLOLOL!!!
Tell that to the thousands of recovery workers who spent months removing vast piles of steel from that site.
yurthammer 1 year ago
@yurthammer Actually seen the debrisfield moments after the ´pancake-collapse´? Where´s the stack? Try looking for it here:
watch?v=709opQ7tyFM
from 3:47 to 4:00 for a birds-eye view and from 6:10 to 7:10 for a GROUND LEVEL view. If this is possible in your world, tell me how. TWO of the largest buildings of the world. Do you see a pile of some sort? Should be two big ones, no?
EdjeBos 1 year ago
Can't wait for the debunkers to come along to work on this... should be entertaining.
It will go something like this: The ground caved in below this visible steel structure due to other debris landing. "The structure then accelerated, intact, quickly to the ground. This could not be clearly seen as the dust coating it before it fell was left behind in a cloud, masking its descent" etc. etc.....
This may also be accompanied by one of the usual nutjob-type insults.
CodeTwo2 1 year ago
it turned to dust!
gordonculp 1 year ago