Okay but the chief accomplishment of the Ephtalites was to roll elephants down cliffs to watch their agony until the Khalsa peoples drove them out for their adharma crimes.
@Sob3r777 You are fucking idiot and blind too hahahaha This video made by a Turk and see how many likes it has.You are an idiot "troll".Go to your cave and stay there!hahahahaha
@podosfairofilos10 We gave justice to the world, with the help of the almighty.
Atilla and his Huns weakened the roman empire for good and someone else came and finished the job. The Selcuks and the Ottomans fought against the byzantinian opressors and the crusaders, eventually stopping further invasions of the crusaders and destroying the byzantium empire. I gotta say, God created us Turks as soldiers, that was our proffesion, back in the days.
justice??Turkey tried to conquer all Europe after that.Do you know why Turkey can't be part of Europe?Check it.Justice and bullshits..i think God left Turks to do that cause He wants to punish Romans for their sins..but that does not mean that barbarians are good for the world hehe.Anyway thank you for your reply,my friend.
@StreetLifeForEver no, they are other turkic people who don't agree with this video... all those empires were turkIC, not turkISH.. Huns, kyrgyz, uyghurs, khazars, avars, timurids(Central Asia+Iran), Golden Horde(turko-mongol khanate of RUS), Empire of Babur(Turko-mongols of India & Iran), Gokturks... & etc... they had nothing to do with modern day turkish people... they were another turkic people
even further back (ancient times) it was called "Attur-padegan" which means the same thing only in an older Eranian variant (Attur -> Attash, and another branch of fire is "Azar/Azer") and the -padegan suffix is the asame as "abadegan" -> land. the Firelands was the birthplace of the Eranian religion of Zardoshti with the birth of Zardusht, which may be way it was called "land of fire"; also the birthplace of the Eranian hero - Babak Khoramdin who defended Eran from those savage Arab muslims.
@yashil17 native american language atış-ka meaning fire...and turkish ateş meaning fire... ;) azer meaning hazar...azerbeycan=hazarbey bey...mr....ateş s turkish word...not iranian...
"native american language they say ..." there are over a hundred native languages, which one is this and where's its proof? like i know in Ojibiwa they call father - "Hodja" and in Turkish/Mongol/Uighyur its "Atta" which this documentry stated was related - "Atta = Hodja/Hodda/Hotta/Hatta/Atta..." but i specifically saw this professor stating that fire in Old Eranian langauges was two parts: Azar/Azer and Atash/Attur/Attar. and you say Azerbaijan means "hazarbey" whats bey"?
who's Lord Hazer? Hazara?! "can" pronouced "Jan" is an ancient Eranian word meaning "life" original pronouciation "Jaan"/"zhaan" (je) in Parsi, man = "Mard" derived from "Marg" = death thus "Margd" = bringer of death; women = "Zan" derived from "Jan" => "Jaan/Zhaan(je)" meaning bringer of life. the famous Persian name "bijan" (like the famous designer) is the Old Eranian name for "bizan" meaning "without wife". Jan is an Eranian word/vajue. how about "Yashasin"? isn't that life ...
... yash = life? also i don't mean to be rude, but can you show evidence for this theory of Azerbaijan meaning "lord hazer life" ?! for the relationship of Turks and Americans, did the DNA of only Turks have the same Ychromosome or all Uighuric peoples -Mongols, Tatars, etc.? also for your Turkish and american common words, which are the american ones? you only show Turkish ones and still it doesn't say which of american languages just - "native american languages". ..
@yashil17 Evidence from the Indians, and the relationship to Turkishness; 1 - DNA Findings 2 to 4 July 1999, the Fellowship of Friendship and Cooperation in Denizli, held the Seventh World Congress of Turkish-speaking M. Franklin Keel (Head of Department of East Indians of America), Indians and Turks, the DNA tests are the same and also the "Y" chromosome, only stating that the Turks and Indians. 2 - Cultural Similarities Indiana University Professor Denis Sinor Turks and the Americans
Turks are NOT neighbors to Americans geographically, but ethnically yes. we studied in American history class that thousands and thousands of yrs ago, when people were migrating to different lands - in Siberia moved to America through the "Bearing strait" between Siberia and America (at the time it was much closer) anyways, the Americans had to come from somewhere. and the ancient Siberians were the ancestors of the Mongols/Uighurs/ and Turks, etc. however...
Turks and Eranians are neighbors thus, we have many common words since your ancestors came from a different culture and language and mixed with Eranian, Arabic, Sumerian, etc. forming the modern Turkish language -> us like how Eran and Eranians were created, thousands of yrs ago, the Airiyans settled in the Eranian lands which had natives - >Semetic people and Elamites, and mixed with them forming Eranians and Eranian language. Thus you have many words that we have and we have yours
like "gol", "Calbas->gulbas" etc. and you have ours "Chang, atash/azar, jan/can, and "Hava/Hawa" which you stated was a native word and Turkish. Hava/Havva is an ancient word from Sanskrit and thus the Airiyan language which exist in Eran, Kurdistan (Havar/Hawar) and even Turkish, but it is from the Airiyan languages since the word has Airiyan traites -> "we" pronouciation is mainly in Kurdi, but in older Eranian it was more common; "-ar" (Hawar/Havar) is a sig. Airiyan traite and...
and a refernce to the Airiyan race. it includes "ar, er, ir, and or" such as "Er/Iraan meaning land of Airiyans. the natives have no original contact to the Airiyans specially in Eran or Sanskrit and if it did, havasu would mean "weather" + "wather -> water or weather?!" (keep in mind, we also associate "hava" with weather, so if it was Turkish this city would be "weather" + weather, or hava = weather and "su" = weather"?) how do you now its a native name? maybe its Spanish? ...
... and its meaning havasu = air weather? or air water?! its not even land?! and whats the native meaning with evidence?! where's this in? put more detail mate.
oh, and lastly "chengizkhan" or the original "chingiss Khaan" (Mongolian form) might be related to "cheng"/chang" since in Persian "chang" means the sharp tip of fingers (cats throw chang) it is a reference to the instrument "chang" = Harp which u use your chang to play. the word itself maybe of Turkic origin, but the ..
... Airiyan Eranic peoples but mixed with Turks and seperated from their original homeland - Eran. they both look different, they look more Eranian Airiyan rather Mongoloid, and they celeberate Nowrouz,aswell as many other steppe countries - Kazakistan, Uzbeks, W.China, etc. Azerbaijan is even an Eranian name which was originally Azarabadegan meaning Fire(Azar/Azer) abadegan (abaad -> land, street, place, etc.) therefore meaning "Land of Fire" or Fireland in the Eranian langauge...
nice video, but the pic at 5:12 is not Turkish/Mongol, they are Eranian/Iranian Saga/Scythians, and at 6:33, that does not look Turkic at all; red hair, pale skin, blue eyes, thick eye-bridge, flat chin, long jaw/facial structure, and further all of which are Airiyan traites that's very close to both E'ireann(Ireland) and Eraan. she's most likely E'ireann since they (Gaelic/Celt) have wolfs in their traditions aswell. Lastly Azerbaijan and Tajikistan aren't Turkic countries....
Мелезирани идиоти :) Добре, че сте въвели кръвния данък, иначе расовия ви облик и умствените ви капацитети щяха да са ви, както когато сте дошли в Европа и още щяхте да играете ''турко хоро''
Ahhh ok , Turkey Turks looking different from asian Turks , well you cant say "you are not Turk" or something like that , we are still Turk we can feel it , we are still proud people , we are still Turk like Kürshad , same people who conquered Istanbul , who win indepence war , and only Turks can do it , dont matter how our skin looking like , our culture same , our language same
@schattenfaust lol... only those who have sufficient percentage of mongoloid genes are turkic people. I don't think that it relates to so called tatars (as they are finno-ugric) or turkish people (as they are greek/arab/slavs etc.).
@aizhan1001 You obviously trolling,mongolid and turkic different families related but like english-france kind a different,we are talking almost same language even OUR people geographically is disconnected 1000 years still i can understand turkmen,uzbek even kazakh language,azari,uygur dialect perfectly,but i cant even understand a word from mongolian dialect.
@schattenfaust no, genetics is much stronger than language. I know English but my origin is not English. The ancient turks were mongoloid nomadic people. We have nomadic turkic culture, your culture is not the same as ours. Your look is completely different from our central asian looks. Sorry, we are related linguistically only.
@aizhan1001 No languages creates nations,not n GENETICS there is a huge amount of niation passed away because their language is assimilated and forgotten,sumerians?aztecs/mayans/rings any bell?
English is not your MOTHER LANGUAGE but turkish is my NATIVE LANGUAGE so,if you cant differentiate thoose terms we dont need to talk more.
Turkish people knows where they came from and no one can take this from them not even soviet russian propaganda which intend to torn apart turkic union.
@aizhan1001 Ok your argument is baseless,this is free world you can think whatever you want i respect that,but try to distort reality with bullshit is not a proper way to defend your case.
The Safavid Empire again forgotten!!! I think that some turkish brothers do not like to mention this empire, founded by Shach Ismail although it was founded by turks and its state language was turkish. :((
Does anyone know about the Ogusmane or Ousmane Turkish Chronicle from the 9th century ? Could anyone give me some lead / guide web sites in English or French where I can read about it ? Please answer me in case you have a clue about it.
@peywend Learn English.You're the animals sweetie,you cowards are hiding in caves -the place where you should be and the place you deserve- and trying to destroy us.But you won't make it.Tell us where you are and we'll come to fuck you.
Oh,by the way we kicked your ass like a boss for centuries.That's why you're so angry and jealous ;)
@tatarbulgar yes the bulgarians came from today's Turkie in around 522. AD but they were a small nation on a large territory and they soon accepted the slav language and their culture
Timur Khan and the golden Hord were not Turkish. they were Mongol. they are very close in the sense that the Turks were also a mongol tribe. but the golden Hord was not a tribe of the Turkish branch, i think it was the Tatar tribe. and Timor was a Mongol, Persian empire. a very large portion of his army were shi'aas from Iran. the Seljuk were a dominant Turkish tribe. the Mongols were made up of many different tribes and at the heart of it was the tribe of Genghis khan not the Turks
@good2goskee The Turkic peoples; Turkish,Azerbaijani,Chuvashes,Kazakhs,Tatars,Kyrgyzs,Turkmen,Uyghur,Uzbeks,Bashkirs,Qashqai, Gagauzs,Yakuts,Crimean Karaites,Krymchaks,Karakalpaks,Karachays,Nogais and past civilizations such as the Kumans,Kipchaks,Avars,Bulgars,Turgeshes,Seljuks,Khazars,Ottoman,Mamluks,Timurids,Oghuz,Xiongnu and Huns
'Main' part of historians concur that Huns=Turk and spoke Turkic language but few still debates tho..
Yet still Atilla = most racist Turk ever lived. <3
@werfirst111 THERE is zero proof that Atilla was Turkic. His Hunnic language was VERY different than Tukic languages. The info suggesting the Huns were Turks is highly challenged by experts. Huns are said to be classified as their own ethnic cultural group as Turkics and Mongols are related but separtate.
BTW this vid is flawed b/c Turks relates to Western Asians in Turkey. TURKICS are people that live in central Asia that have links in language/culture similar to relating Spanish and Italians
@good2goskee Huns occurred Tunguz, Oghur and other etnic group. Well, Do you know Who are Oghur/Tunguz? Tunguz registered in Ergenekon Epic. Ergenekon is Turkic Epic. Atilla's father was Muncuk (boncuk) This is Turkish name. This means that the ''beads''. And Tunguzes had Turkic Altaic Turk language and lived in Central Asia. Like Turks... And You should research Orkhon İnscription. It is old Turkic and It mention Tunguz/Nukuz.
@werfirst111 Dude...his name has many ethnic overlaps .. including turkic.Many experts see distinct Gothic connections 'atta' meaning father. Pritsak's theory of Bulgarian turkic connection has been thrown out. There are far too many experts in Asian history and linguistics that feel there is no clear turkic distinction and see the Huns as a distinct group. Their language is closest to Finnish.
@good2goskee@good2goskee 'atta&ata ' is a Turkish word. Go and research. Mean is father. The all Turkic language have this word.(Turkish, Azerbaijani, O'zbek) Atilla's father: 'Boncuk' is a Turkish word. The all sources mention Atilla as follows 'Flagellum Dei'. '' their language was a Turkic language'' (from Wikipedia) And They have Altaic language, like Turkish. Finnish is Uralic...
@werfirst111 On wiki it states there is great debate re. the origins and etymology of the word. Some scholars state it is GOTHIC and means "father". Altaic does not mean Turkic
@Regalya Atila was Hun. Turk is not Hun...many experts believe that they are their own ethnic cultural group. They are sepparate like Mongols to Turks to Huns. Hunnic is more similar to Finnish/Hungarian than Turkic language.
@Xxkingrx68 What I'm saying is that there is a lot of evidence that suggests Attila was not Turkic. There are many scholars that suggest the Huns were their own sepparate ethnic group such as, Mongols,and Turkics. His language is closest to Finnish. (I did not say he was Finnish)
@good2goskee Attila was Turk the name it self is Turkic. Me I am not Turkic or married to Turkic but if you do not believe me go and visit any Turkic countaries from Kyrgystan to Turkey then you will see men or boys named attila. If you go the remote villages of Turkmenistan, Kyrgystan, Uzbekistan you will find any body called Attila but you can not get This name any part of the world. the scholars you are mentioning never visted central Asia.
@good2goskee The name Attila come from the verb Attil means has broken when calling person Attila it means the man who borke( he has broken his enemy). the other evidence is the archiological evidence shows helmet of Hun soldier similar to helmet of early Seljuk soldier.also the Fossils of horses which was discovered in thier graveyard is same as that of Turkic horses. Also the DNA of Hun fossil that was discovered in Hungary shows that they are Turkic race.
@SAMAND33 simple search shows that his name means "father" in Gothic. There are only 2 credible scholars who promote Huns as Turkic.....many more are VERY dubious about it. However, funny how the Turks are so determined to find ways at attaching themselves to Huns. There are 6 other ethnic groups that claim the Huns as their ethnic cousins. Turks are just one....so stand in line
@good2goskee Man go and visit the villages of Turkey and central asia you will get names like Attila and if you ask these villagers about Attila we are talking about you will see they never heard of him sometimes they may think you are talking about attila in thier village. The DNA of Hun fossil found in Hungry shows thier Turkic origin and also one helmet of Hun soldier that was discovered shows similarity with a helmet of Seljuk worrior(Turk) So go and visit central Asia.
@SAMAND33 Look at the region of the Goths it completely encompasses the heartland area of the Huns. Like I said, the etymology has potentially 5-6 different origins-Turkic being only one. Goth for 'Father' is Atilla. Their are many artifacts that suggest heavy Germanic influences related to Hunnics. There is no clear Turkic connection. There are as many Persian connections to Atilla as there are Turkic
@good2goskee They are nothing to do with Goths. Goths amd other Europeans were not horse worriors but the Huns were horse worrior like the other Turkic tribes. Huns they fought their enemy like the other Turkic tribes. The traditional dress they took, is same as the Turkic. Go and visit central asia why are you hesitant?
@good2goskee look the tactics of fighting used by Huns nothing to do with Germanic Goths who used foot soldiers but the Huns used horse archery like the Turkic. The bons and the Helmets of Hun worriors were found in hungry and the DNA shows the come from central asia, similar to that Turkic.
@ratzP Huns is not Hungarians. Huns were people like Avars, Bulgars, East-Germanic, Iranian peoples. The Hungarians only came a couple of centuries later to Europe and conquored the Slavicized Turkic Bulgars in modern day Hungary.
@SAMAND33 There are artifacts that reflect an eastern germanic influence to the Huns. Suggesting that firing bows from horses is exclusively Turkic is funny. The fact is these stepp influences were many. The Rus, Persians and Mongols used similar tactics, weapons, and clothes to various degree. Please show me a NON-Turkic (bias) source that states the Huns were genetically Turks. Turks are as varied as Latins
@good2goskee Rus never Used but the Bulgars Turkeys were not Known but they had different names. Hun soldier dressed and fought like Turks huns nothing to do with eastern Germanic the Germanic tribes were foot soldiers. the names the Huns had you can find them in central asia. You mentioned mongol of course mongols share many genes with the Turks Because they were neighbours for long. conlutions Huns were from the steppes and they were Turks
@good2goskee What you are saying is not official but I know the Goths camefrom the island of Gotland which is now sweden and nothing to do with central asia central asia was inhappited by Turkic and Iranic tribes. Turkic huns invaded europe when they trying to push the Iranic tribes westward. Iranic tribes like Scytho-Sarmatian or Alans.
@SAMAND33 They origianally came from Sweden, into Russia, and into Western Asian covering areas north and around the Black Sea (my apologies I said Central Asia...I meant Western Asia). Where they conquered is consisered Cremia Tarter or Scythian territory in antiquity.As stated before there are strong lingusitic links to Huns
@good2goskee The way the historian described them is not the blondy swedish, specialy Greeks discribed them as The huns had wide shoulder and stretched small eyes typical early Turks and Mongol. Their bones were discored and genetically are Turk. Go to google look at genetic similarities between Turks and Huns the you will see. The way they fought is Turkic not Germanic. Tartars we the parts of Huns, dominated Eurasia until the Russians got gun powder technology.
@SAMAND33 have you seen Finns?....not all are blond....many have stretched eyes. Also, to be Goth (visigoth or ostrogoths) doesn't mean you are of pure nordic stock. They conqured and mixed with many people (Euro, Rus, Tartar and other Asians) over centuries changing their looks and strategies. Looking at the monument to Atila in 'HUN'gian parliment, he doesn't look Seljuk Asian but rather very Euro in features. The Goths and others adapt to their environment and mix over time as others did.
@good2goskee turkish-hungarian-english elma- alma- apple elmam- almám- my apple elmalarım- almáim- my apples ada- szige-t island adam- szigetem- my island adalarım- szigeteim- my islands Ev- ház- house evim- házam- my house evlerim- házaim- my houses çocuku- gyerek- child çocuğum- gyerekem- my child çocuklarım- gyerekeim- my children.
@SAMAND33 Isn't language cool! Turkic is Altaic & melds with part of the Indo-Germanic liguistic family link. Hunnic is considered its own ethnic branch just as Mongols and Turkics and is part of that meld. I'm not saying Huns are Goths. I am saying they appear to be a hybrid. Similar to Turkics and Mongols being related. To say a Mongol is Turkic is simply wrong. To say a Persian is Turkic is wrong, to say a Hun is Goth is wrong but they are individual ethnics with those cultural influences
@good2goskee Huns were Turks and in Chinesse were called Hsiognu= Hunu in Latin and in English Hun. They come from central asia they were Turkic tribes. After years of struggle with China they moved to the west. They called Hun or Gogturk.
@SAMAND33 That's great.....the reality is most Turks from Turkey will argue until they are blue in their face to convince themselves that somehow Huns and Ghengis Khan or anything that might be historically great &Turkic are direct reflections on Turkey. Its the Turkish education system that propogates this- I understand.
However, Turkic is as varied as being Latin (Romanian to Chilean). There are MANY credible easily found anthropologists & historians who challenge the Hunnic/Turkic notion
@good2goskee Turkish Education system is Good when it comes history. our system of education existed for many centuries since the seljuks and the ottomans. Come to Turkey bring your books and I am ready to show you many evidences. The Archiologist found corpses of Huns and Genetical are similar to that of the Turkic not Ugric or Germanic. Also the way their weopons designed is Turkic. Germanic swords were streight while huns swords were curved like that of the Turks.
@SAMAND33 you guys have history... but the distinctive spin that Turks seem to put on it is very suspect. I see it over and over that is why I come to this conclusion
@good2goskee In Hungarian also the vowels can be interconnected through the laws of vowel harmony, the affixes can take two or three forms, usually agree with the last vowel in stem:
a, e (-ban,ben in ) , ((v)al,(v)el with), (ba,be into),(ra-re onto) á,é (nál,nél at),((v)á,(v)é into a) ó,ő (ból,ből from) (tól,től from nearby)
@good2goskee Exemples: ház házban, kocsi kocsiban,mese mesében ,alma almában,víz vízben, film filmben tükör tükörben,kút kútban,
In Hungarian the possessive affix is –m, all stems with final a,e are altered in á,é before most affixes. The oblique stem is an exception : torok (throat) torkom (my throat) gyomor (stomach), gyomrom (my stomach),dal (song) dalom (my song),
@good2goskee In Hungarian two plural are used –k : gyerek, gyerekek , the other plural -i is used only with person affixes, gyerekeimet my children, in accusative.
@good2goskee Turkic People never came under thier enemy control . Finns and estonians are ural people and they were conquered by vikings. 90% of Finns are blond.
@SAMAND33 are we understanding eachother properly? Are you saying the Goths never conquered anyone or controlled territory that were in Western Asia in antiquity of Turkic nature? Not that it is relavant but there are parts of Finnland which are 80% or more blond and parts that are less. Goth transition into western asia was not immediate to say they are nordics is like saying Mexicans are Spaniards. Mexicans are influenced by Spain and have Spainish roots mixed with others
@good2goskee Goths never said foot in central asia. The Goths as refugee fllee from Huns and the Romans opened the door for them. The Goths were 2 Visigoths and ostorgoths. So the flee to the west and south where they can survive remaining became slaves of Hun Turk. read history.
@good2goskee Ostoro Goths felt to the south were they disappeared within Greek territory. and visigoths moved as far as west and reached spain and thier last king Redrique was slaughtered by the Arabs in 711 that is almost after 300 years of their exodus form east.
Chinese is the best race upon this earth, the chinese defeated the Hun and chased them out of china till where they reside now in modern day eastern europe...the roman empire were destroyed by the hun but the hun was thoroughly defeated by the chinese and were forced to abandon their homeland in the altaic mountain area.
Video ile ilgili bir kaç eleştirim var. Öncelikle Büyük Hun İmparatorluğu unutulmuş, Avrupa Hun İmparatorluğundan itibaren devletler sayılmaya başlanmış.Büyük hükümdarlar içinde de Mete Han yani Oğuz Kağan unutulmuş ki destan yazmışız hakkında. Bunları da eklesen daha iyi olur
guys don't get confused, Mongolia is a country but it is also a part of central Asia. and turks are also from same area, however if u say Turkestan it means all the central Asian countries. therefore people from central Asia share same gene same blood.Mongol fought Muslims and then later on they become Muslim after killing millions of Muslim they realize "ISLAM" is the way of life.however near about 70% of entire Asian populations are Muslim. So U can say it's a Muslim Continent.
Chengiz Khan was purest Turk, at least more purest than modern day Turkish people from Turkey. Did his name Cengiz Khan do not telling you anything about his nationality? the word mongol is the same as bingol. you seems do not knows your own turk history, and moreover you have europ-centric complex thats why you do not want to have purest turk as your relative, you prefered to have greek of kurd.
I don't see so much diffrent from the turkish islamists and the iranian regim, they both hide the truth. We KURDS will never give up matter what, you may call us terrorist, but for what?! For we fight to the right to speak our laguage,to have our right owned country?You mongols attacked the civilization while the world was calm. Mongols did nothing else than kill, ride horses and rape! For me thats barbarian,you steel others cultures.
@TheZagros3000 Turks did slave trade and fight to conquer on a era that those stuff were perfectly normal for every nation even the roman empire which is center of civilisation were running with slave trading but you Kurds claim we're barbarians ? Who raided raped and murdered over 60 tousand armenian when they banished from empire to the syria who's working as a follow up Asala the terrorist = PKK who killed tens of tousand civilians who's the biggest drug grp in the world its PKK again...
@Regalya First of all PKK is not the biggest drug group, it don't any thing whi drugs to do so i don't know where you got that false info.Yes we killed armenians coz you said if we would we wood get a country but you lied!. You did much more than slave trade!! You burned land, rape as i said and much more.
Turkic people aren`t Mongolia. Hunnu aren`t Turks. Hunnus are Mongols. They was living in Mongolia in 7,8 ceturies BC.
baroquemetal 2 days ago
Okay but the chief accomplishment of the Ephtalites was to roll elephants down cliffs to watch their agony until the Khalsa peoples drove them out for their adharma crimes.
IanHunedoara8 5 days ago
Comment removed
podosfairofilos10 1 week ago
Comment removed
Sob3r777 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Sob3r777 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
podosfairofilos10 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sob3r777 You are fucking idiot and blind too hahahaha This video made by a Turk and see how many likes it has.You are an idiot "troll".Go to your cave and stay there!hahahahaha
podosfairofilos10 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@podosfairofilos10 Everybody has there own hobby,right? I think u aint 100% ;) Crazy horse. Repeating my words is no answer TROLL!
Sob3r777 2 weeks ago
so..turks are mongols,right?i just saw Jenkis Hun.I can't understand why are you proud??
you are barbarians and stealers,you didn't made anything,only steal and destroy...i really can't understand..i don't hate you,i just ask.
podosfairofilos10 2 weeks ago
@podosfairofilos10 We gave justice to the world, with the help of the almighty.
Atilla and his Huns weakened the roman empire for good and someone else came and finished the job. The Selcuks and the Ottomans fought against the byzantinian opressors and the crusaders, eventually stopping further invasions of the crusaders and destroying the byzantium empire. I gotta say, God created us Turks as soldiers, that was our proffesion, back in the days.
AbdYam93 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
justice??Turkey tried to conquer all Europe after that.Do you know why Turkey can't be part of Europe?Check it.Justice and bullshits..i think God left Turks to do that cause He wants to punish Romans for their sins..but that does not mean that barbarians are good for the world hehe.Anyway thank you for your reply,my friend.
podosfairofilos10 1 week ago
@podosfairofilos10 turks arent mongols, turkics are from central asia, not mongol, but turkic. turkic existed before mongolians.
iSlash96 3 days ago
75 bulgarians :)) Hail Bulgaria Fail Turkish
StreetLifeForEver 3 weeks ago
@StreetLifeForEver no, they are other turkic people who don't agree with this video... all those empires were turkIC, not turkISH.. Huns, kyrgyz, uyghurs, khazars, avars, timurids(Central Asia+Iran), Golden Horde(turko-mongol khanate of RUS), Empire of Babur(Turko-mongols of India & Iran), Gokturks... & etc... they had nothing to do with modern day turkish people... they were another turkic people
Askar9992 3 weeks ago
@Askar9992 and the "modern day turkish people" came from where??i thought turks are mongols like Jenkis Hun.
podosfairofilos10 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
podosfairofilos10 2 weeks ago
hahaha bulshit!
shynizzl 4 weeks ago
u know havasu city in america...turkish meaning hava=air...su=wather...
havasu native american and turkish language in the same meaning...
burakkk55 1 month ago
even further back (ancient times) it was called "Attur-padegan" which means the same thing only in an older Eranian variant (Attur -> Attash, and another branch of fire is "Azar/Azer") and the -padegan suffix is the asame as "abadegan" -> land. the Firelands was the birthplace of the Eranian religion of Zardoshti with the birth of Zardusht, which may be way it was called "land of fire"; also the birthplace of the Eranian hero - Babak Khoramdin who defended Eran from those savage Arab muslims.
yashil17 1 month ago
@yashil17 native american language atış-ka meaning fire...and turkish ateş meaning fire... ;) azer meaning hazar...azerbeycan=hazarbey bey...mr....ateş s turkish word...not iranian...
burakkk55 1 month ago
@burakkk55
"native american language they say ..." there are over a hundred native languages, which one is this and where's its proof? like i know in Ojibiwa they call father - "Hodja" and in Turkish/Mongol/Uighyur its "Atta" which this documentry stated was related - "Atta = Hodja/Hodda/Hotta/Hatta/Atta..." but i specifically saw this professor stating that fire in Old Eranian langauges was two parts: Azar/Azer and Atash/Attur/Attar. and you say Azerbaijan means "hazarbey" whats bey"?
yashil17 1 month ago
@yashil17 bey meaning the lord...hazer or azer s a name...hazerbey meaning lord hazer...ok...this is turkish....azer-bey-can... can meaning life...
burakkk55 1 month ago
@burakkk55
who's Lord Hazer? Hazara?! "can" pronouced "Jan" is an ancient Eranian word meaning "life" original pronouciation "Jaan"/"zhaan" (je) in Parsi, man = "Mard" derived from "Marg" = death thus "Margd" = bringer of death; women = "Zan" derived from "Jan" => "Jaan/Zhaan(je)" meaning bringer of life. the famous Persian name "bijan" (like the famous designer) is the Old Eranian name for "bizan" meaning "without wife". Jan is an Eranian word/vajue. how about "Yashasin"? isn't that life ...
yashil17 1 month ago
@burakkk55
... yash = life? also i don't mean to be rude, but can you show evidence for this theory of Azerbaijan meaning "lord hazer life" ?! for the relationship of Turks and Americans, did the DNA of only Turks have the same Ychromosome or all Uighuric peoples -Mongols, Tatars, etc.? also for your Turkish and american common words, which are the american ones? you only show Turkish ones and still it doesn't say which of american languages just - "native american languages". ..
yashil17 1 month ago
burakkk55 1 month ago
@burakkk55
atash is a Eranian word passed to Turks, like Chang - Ceng, or many other ones.
yashil17 1 month ago
@yashil17 Evidence from the Indians, and the relationship to Turkishness; 1 - DNA Findings 2 to 4 July 1999, the Fellowship of Friendship and Cooperation in Denizli, held the Seventh World Congress of Turkish-speaking M. Franklin Keel (Head of Department of East Indians of America), Indians and Turks, the DNA tests are the same and also the "Y" chromosome, only stating that the Turks and Indians. 2 - Cultural Similarities Indiana University Professor Denis Sinor Turks and the Americans
burakkk55 1 month ago
Comment removed
burakkk55 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yashil17 u know...2000 Turkish and 409 mongolian word passed iranian language...???and arabic words in Persian words of 80%...
burakkk55 1 month ago
@yashil17 we are neighbors,there are words of common...this normal...but native american and Turkish r neighbors?????
burakkk55 1 month ago
@burakkk55
Turks are NOT neighbors to Americans geographically, but ethnically yes. we studied in American history class that thousands and thousands of yrs ago, when people were migrating to different lands - in Siberia moved to America through the "Bearing strait" between Siberia and America (at the time it was much closer) anyways, the Americans had to come from somewhere. and the ancient Siberians were the ancestors of the Mongols/Uighurs/ and Turks, etc. however...
yashil17 1 month ago
@burakkk55
Turks and Eranians are neighbors thus, we have many common words since your ancestors came from a different culture and language and mixed with Eranian, Arabic, Sumerian, etc. forming the modern Turkish language -> us like how Eran and Eranians were created, thousands of yrs ago, the Airiyans settled in the Eranian lands which had natives - >Semetic people and Elamites, and mixed with them forming Eranians and Eranian language. Thus you have many words that we have and we have yours
yashil17 1 month ago
@burakkk55
like "gol", "Calbas->gulbas" etc. and you have ours "Chang, atash/azar, jan/can, and "Hava/Hawa" which you stated was a native word and Turkish. Hava/Havva is an ancient word from Sanskrit and thus the Airiyan language which exist in Eran, Kurdistan (Havar/Hawar) and even Turkish, but it is from the Airiyan languages since the word has Airiyan traites -> "we" pronouciation is mainly in Kurdi, but in older Eranian it was more common; "-ar" (Hawar/Havar) is a sig. Airiyan traite and...
yashil17 1 month ago
@yashil17 Turkish history B.C 10.000...iranian history rich but compared with the history of Türks,iranian history very poor...thank you...
burakkk55 1 month ago
@yashil17 chengizkhan...cengizhan....warriorking...ceng turko-mongol common word...passed iranian language :)) nice example :))
burakkk55 1 month ago
@burakkk55
and a refernce to the Airiyan race. it includes "ar, er, ir, and or" such as "Er/Iraan meaning land of Airiyans. the natives have no original contact to the Airiyans specially in Eran or Sanskrit and if it did, havasu would mean "weather" + "wather -> water or weather?!" (keep in mind, we also associate "hava" with weather, so if it was Turkish this city would be "weather" + weather, or hava = weather and "su" = weather"?) how do you now its a native name? maybe its Spanish? ...
yashil17 1 month ago
@yashil17 you say maybe..this...maybe,maybe,maybe,maybe...:))maybe u r a bastard...maybe...
burakkk55 1 month ago
@burakkk55
... and its meaning havasu = air weather? or air water?! its not even land?! and whats the native meaning with evidence?! where's this in? put more detail mate.
oh, and lastly "chengizkhan" or the original "chingiss Khaan" (Mongolian form) might be related to "cheng"/chang" since in Persian "chang" means the sharp tip of fingers (cats throw chang) it is a reference to the instrument "chang" = Harp which u use your chang to play. the word itself maybe of Turkic origin, but the ..
yashil17 1 month ago
@burakkk55
instrument is known to be Eranian/Persian, since the oldest found harp was in Eran about 2,500yrs ago. thanks :))
yashil17 1 month ago
... Airiyan Eranic peoples but mixed with Turks and seperated from their original homeland - Eran. they both look different, they look more Eranian Airiyan rather Mongoloid, and they celeberate Nowrouz,aswell as many other steppe countries - Kazakistan, Uzbeks, W.China, etc. Azerbaijan is even an Eranian name which was originally Azarabadegan meaning Fire(Azar/Azer) abadegan (abaad -> land, street, place, etc.) therefore meaning "Land of Fire" or Fireland in the Eranian langauge...
yashil17 1 month ago
nice video, but the pic at 5:12 is not Turkish/Mongol, they are Eranian/Iranian Saga/Scythians, and at 6:33, that does not look Turkic at all; red hair, pale skin, blue eyes, thick eye-bridge, flat chin, long jaw/facial structure, and further all of which are Airiyan traites that's very close to both E'ireann(Ireland) and Eraan. she's most likely E'ireann since they (Gaelic/Celt) have wolfs in their traditions aswell. Lastly Azerbaijan and Tajikistan aren't Turkic countries....
yashil17 1 month ago
Мелезирани идиоти :) Добре, че сте въвели кръвния данък, иначе расовия ви облик и умствените ви капацитети щяха да са ви, както когато сте дошли в Европа и още щяхте да играете ''турко хоро''
geSStapo666 1 month ago
Ghengis Khan???? was'nt he from mongolia
lonsted123 2 months ago
@lonsted123
Ghengis khan was a Tatar Turk , and his most of men were Turk even commanders
ardaxoy 1 month ago
@ardaxoy In what dimension?
lonsted123 1 month ago
@lonsted123 8 Turk , 1 Mongolian
ardaxoy 1 month ago
Ahhh ok , Turkey Turks looking different from asian Turks , well you cant say "you are not Turk" or something like that , we are still Turk we can feel it , we are still proud people , we are still Turk like Kürshad , same people who conquered Istanbul , who win indepence war , and only Turks can do it , dont matter how our skin looking like , our culture same , our language same
ardaxoy 2 months ago
Turkish =/= Turkic
Turkish people want to be related to completely different people
Turkic people are mongoloid central asian nomads, Turkish people are not from our stock. No offence.
aizhan1001 2 months ago
@aizhan1001 To much russian bullshit ehh?,
kazakhs,uzbeks,azari,kirgiz,turkmen,anatolian turkmen(turkish),tatars is related like it or not i dont give a damn no offense
schattenfaust 2 months ago
@schattenfaust lol... only those who have sufficient percentage of mongoloid genes are turkic people. I don't think that it relates to so called tatars (as they are finno-ugric) or turkish people (as they are greek/arab/slavs etc.).
aizhan1001 2 months ago
@aizhan1001 You obviously trolling,mongolid and turkic different families related but like english-france kind a different,we are talking almost same language even OUR people geographically is disconnected 1000 years still i can understand turkmen,uzbek even kazakh language,azari,uygur dialect perfectly,but i cant even understand a word from mongolian dialect.
culture and language creates unity not DNA,
schattenfaust 2 months ago
@schattenfaust no, genetics is much stronger than language. I know English but my origin is not English. The ancient turks were mongoloid nomadic people. We have nomadic turkic culture, your culture is not the same as ours. Your look is completely different from our central asian looks. Sorry, we are related linguistically only.
aizhan1001 2 months ago
@aizhan1001 No languages creates nations,not n GENETICS there is a huge amount of niation passed away because their language is assimilated and forgotten,sumerians?aztecs/mayans/rings any bell?
English is not your MOTHER LANGUAGE but turkish is my NATIVE LANGUAGE so,if you cant differentiate thoose terms we dont need to talk more.
Turkish people knows where they came from and no one can take this from them not even soviet russian propaganda which intend to torn apart turkic union.
schattenfaust 2 months ago
@schattenfaust no problem, I just would not like to be in one union with your country. Turkey is good but please don't try to be closer.
aizhan1001 2 months ago
@aizhan1001 Ok your argument is baseless,this is free world you can think whatever you want i respect that,but try to distort reality with bullshit is not a proper way to defend your case.
Best Wishes
schattenfaust 2 months ago
Turkey fuck!!!GREECE FOR EVER!!!!GREEK PRIDE!!!!
123CePrin 3 months ago
@123CePrin you are checking turkish video and talking about greek pride:))))) irony ehhh
schattenfaust 2 months ago
@schattenfaust to go fuck yourself .. the Turks are proud .. the Greek Greece to win
123CePrin 2 months ago
@123CePrin No youı go fuckyourself to type your stupid option on Greek Greece win videos fucking retarded facist troll.
schattenfaust 2 months ago
@schattenfaust you mother fucker I fuck you and your country
123CePrin 2 months ago
@123CePrin Look Grik try to speak ENGRISH.fucking barbarian,to much 300 spartans?
schattenfaust 2 months ago
@schattenfaust I speak English well .. I did not understand anything .. anyway that Greece is Greece
123CePrin 1 month ago
@123CePrin Racist people are generaly retarded you are no exception:)
schattenfaust 1 month ago
@123CePrin hahahah..gamw tin mana sou malaka!!!
123CePrin 2 months ago
@peywend norwegian terrorist dog
keep on barking
yklocnykl 3 months ago
ha haahahhahaha hahah the analian 2= breds are sooooooooooooooooo joker lolz...
infiltratorr 3 months ago
The Safavid Empire again forgotten!!! I think that some turkish brothers do not like to mention this empire, founded by Shach Ismail although it was founded by turks and its state language was turkish. :((
kamran604 3 months ago
Does anyone know about the Ogusmane or Ousmane Turkish Chronicle from the 9th century ? Could anyone give me some lead / guide web sites in English or French where I can read about it ? Please answer me in case you have a clue about it.
ROMANABSOLUT 3 months ago
I love tukey history. I like FATIH SULTAN
samkanai92 4 months ago
TURKEY FOR EVER!!!
WE DESTROY ALL THAM!! RİSE OF TURKS!!
TaurusAnger 4 months ago
FUCKING MONGOLIAN HAVE TOK KURDISTAN FROM OSS GOOD MONGOLIAN IS A DEAD MONGOLTURK THEY SAME ANIMAL AND STOL CONTRY FROM KURDS, GREEK AND ARMENIAN.
peywend 4 months ago
@peywend Learn English.You're the animals sweetie,you cowards are hiding in caves -the place where you should be and the place you deserve- and trying to destroy us.But you won't make it.Tell us where you are and we'll come to fuck you.
Oh,by the way we kicked your ass like a boss for centuries.That's why you're so angry and jealous ;)
cryxannia 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mongol khans are not turks. turks stop making stupid videos!
Bultuush1 5 months ago
Comment removed
Bultuush1 5 months ago
FAKE WESTERN EDUCATION AGAINT TURKISH HISTORY AND ITS CULTURE,YOU IGNORENT WESTERNS YOU WERE MANIPULATED BY YOUR FAKE HISTORIANS.
yklocnykl 5 months ago
The Bulgarian Empire?
tatarbulgar 6 months ago
@tatarbulgar yes the bulgarians came from today's Turkie in around 522. AD but they were a small nation on a large territory and they soon accepted the slav language and their culture
TheSgtBlueberry 5 months ago
@TheSgtBlueberry I didnt know this, but for sure we are turkic people, who adopted the slavic languange.
tatarbulgar 5 months ago
Timur Khan and the golden Hord were not Turkish. they were Mongol. they are very close in the sense that the Turks were also a mongol tribe. but the golden Hord was not a tribe of the Turkish branch, i think it was the Tatar tribe. and Timor was a Mongol, Persian empire. a very large portion of his army were shi'aas from Iran. the Seljuk were a dominant Turkish tribe. the Mongols were made up of many different tribes and at the heart of it was the tribe of Genghis khan not the Turks
TheScienceofnature 6 months ago
hahaha. what a load of crap........never seen so much bullshit before in my life. Regards from Australia!!!!!
MrNMT69 6 months ago
oglum siz turkler yeni nesillersiniz.
peywend 7 months ago
All emperors are tyrant slayers...
Wants to invade and reach their dreams...
Can you count how many innocents are killed...?
Men are scavengers they never think...
Only they shout...drink...and sing
Destroying civilizations
Ignoring the lost lives...
Sylva-MD-Poetry
DrSylva22 7 months ago
sktr aq! temuchin de turkse... adam turklerin aq du...
de de japon imparatoru da turk de! herkes turk aq...
karteorhan 7 months ago
what is the point of the video!
RemoteControl99aJJI 8 months ago
And Cengiz Khan was a Turk. His real name was TEMÜRÇİN. Temürçin's root is TEMÜR. Temür is old Turkic word. Now DEMİR. i.e. iron.
werfirst111 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@good2goskee The Turkic peoples; Turkish,Azerbaijani,Chuvashes,Kazakhs,Tatars,Kyrgyzs,Turkmen,Uyghur,Uzbeks,Bashkirs,Qashqai, Gagauzs,Yakuts,Crimean Karaites,Krymchaks,Karakalpaks,Karachays,Nogais and past civilizations such as the Kumans,Kipchaks,Avars,Bulgars,Turgeshes,Seljuks,Khazars,Ottoman,Mamluks,Timurids,Oghuz,Xiongnu and Huns
'Main' part of historians concur that Huns=Turk and spoke Turkic language but few still debates tho..
Yet still Atilla = most racist Turk ever lived. <3
Regalya 8 months ago
HEY!! ATİLLA WAS A TURK: ATİLLA'S NAME İS TURK NAME. TARKAN İS TURK NAME.
werfirst111 8 months ago
@werfirst111 THERE is zero proof that Atilla was Turkic. His Hunnic language was VERY different than Tukic languages. The info suggesting the Huns were Turks is highly challenged by experts. Huns are said to be classified as their own ethnic cultural group as Turkics and Mongols are related but separtate.
BTW this vid is flawed b/c Turks relates to Western Asians in Turkey. TURKICS are people that live in central Asia that have links in language/culture similar to relating Spanish and Italians
good2goskee 8 months ago
@good2goskee Huns occurred Tunguz, Oghur and other etnic group. Well, Do you know Who are Oghur/Tunguz? Tunguz registered in Ergenekon Epic. Ergenekon is Turkic Epic. Atilla's father was Muncuk (boncuk) This is Turkish name. This means that the ''beads''. And Tunguzes had Turkic Altaic Turk language and lived in Central Asia. Like Turks... And You should research Orkhon İnscription. It is old Turkic and It mention Tunguz/Nukuz.
werfirst111 8 months ago
@werfirst111 Dude...his name has many ethnic overlaps .. including turkic.Many experts see distinct Gothic connections 'atta' meaning father. Pritsak's theory of Bulgarian turkic connection has been thrown out. There are far too many experts in Asian history and linguistics that feel there is no clear turkic distinction and see the Huns as a distinct group. Their language is closest to Finnish.
good2goskee 8 months ago
@good2goskee @good2goskee 'atta&ata ' is a Turkish word. Go and research. Mean is father. The all Turkic language have this word.(Turkish, Azerbaijani, O'zbek) Atilla's father: 'Boncuk' is a Turkish word. The all sources mention Atilla as follows 'Flagellum Dei'. '' their language was a Turkic language'' (from Wikipedia) And They have Altaic language, like Turkish. Finnish is Uralic...
werfirst111 8 months ago
@werfirst111 On wiki it states there is great debate re. the origins and etymology of the word. Some scholars state it is GOTHIC and means "father". Altaic does not mean Turkic
good2goskee 8 months ago
@good2goskee Ang Hun's religion was Tengriism, like Turks. But Hungarian or Finnish's religion was Christian.
werfirst111 8 months ago
@werfirst111 The Finns were not Christian in 400AD (the time of Attilla). The Christianization of Finland was more than 400years later
good2goskee 8 months ago
Attila is bulgarian.
geSStapo666 9 months ago
@geSStapo666
Hungarian
jmghun 9 months ago
@geSStapo666 Atilla was Hun turk also know most Racist Turk ever lived.
Regalya 9 months ago
@Regalya Atila was Hun. Turk is not Hun...many experts believe that they are their own ethnic cultural group. They are sepparate like Mongols to Turks to Huns. Hunnic is more similar to Finnish/Hungarian than Turkic language.
good2goskee 8 months ago
Comment removed
Regalya 8 months ago
@good2goskee wtf you talking about
huns are not finnish -,-
the huns were ancient turkic ..
Xxkingrx68 8 months ago
@Xxkingrx68 What I'm saying is that there is a lot of evidence that suggests Attila was not Turkic. There are many scholars that suggest the Huns were their own sepparate ethnic group such as, Mongols,and Turkics. His language is closest to Finnish. (I did not say he was Finnish)
good2goskee 8 months ago
@good2goskee Attila was Turk the name it self is Turkic. Me I am not Turkic or married to Turkic but if you do not believe me go and visit any Turkic countaries from Kyrgystan to Turkey then you will see men or boys named attila. If you go the remote villages of Turkmenistan, Kyrgystan, Uzbekistan you will find any body called Attila but you can not get This name any part of the world. the scholars you are mentioning never visted central Asia.
SAMAND33 8 months ago
@good2goskee The name Attila come from the verb Attil means has broken when calling person Attila it means the man who borke( he has broken his enemy). the other evidence is the archiological evidence shows helmet of Hun soldier similar to helmet of early Seljuk soldier.also the Fossils of horses which was discovered in thier graveyard is same as that of Turkic horses. Also the DNA of Hun fossil that was discovered in Hungary shows that they are Turkic race.
SAMAND33 8 months ago
@SAMAND33 simple search shows that his name means "father" in Gothic. There are only 2 credible scholars who promote Huns as Turkic.....many more are VERY dubious about it. However, funny how the Turks are so determined to find ways at attaching themselves to Huns. There are 6 other ethnic groups that claim the Huns as their ethnic cousins. Turks are just one....so stand in line
good2goskee 8 months ago
@good2goskee Man go and visit the villages of Turkey and central asia you will get names like Attila and if you ask these villagers about Attila we are talking about you will see they never heard of him sometimes they may think you are talking about attila in thier village. The DNA of Hun fossil found in Hungry shows thier Turkic origin and also one helmet of Hun soldier that was discovered shows similarity with a helmet of Seljuk worrior(Turk) So go and visit central Asia.
SAMAND33 8 months ago
Comment removed
good2goskee 8 months ago
@SAMAND33 Look at the region of the Goths it completely encompasses the heartland area of the Huns. Like I said, the etymology has potentially 5-6 different origins-Turkic being only one. Goth for 'Father' is Atilla. Their are many artifacts that suggest heavy Germanic influences related to Hunnics. There is no clear Turkic connection. There are as many Persian connections to Atilla as there are Turkic
good2goskee 8 months ago
@good2goskee They are nothing to do with Goths. Goths amd other Europeans were not horse worriors but the Huns were horse worrior like the other Turkic tribes. Huns they fought their enemy like the other Turkic tribes. The traditional dress they took, is same as the Turkic. Go and visit central asia why are you hesitant?
SAMAND33 8 months ago
@good2goskee look the tactics of fighting used by Huns nothing to do with Germanic Goths who used foot soldiers but the Huns used horse archery like the Turkic. The bons and the Helmets of Hun worriors were found in hungry and the DNA shows the come from central asia, similar to that Turkic.
SAMAND33 8 months ago
@SAMAND33 u mean the Hungarias r Turkic badasses ?? = BADass-NEWS
ratzP 8 months ago
@ratzP Huns is not Hungarians. Huns were people like Avars, Bulgars, East-Germanic, Iranian peoples. The Hungarians only came a couple of centuries later to Europe and conquored the Slavicized Turkic Bulgars in modern day Hungary.
MrReoNetro 8 months ago
@SAMAND33 There are artifacts that reflect an eastern germanic influence to the Huns. Suggesting that firing bows from horses is exclusively Turkic is funny. The fact is these stepp influences were many. The Rus, Persians and Mongols used similar tactics, weapons, and clothes to various degree. Please show me a NON-Turkic (bias) source that states the Huns were genetically Turks. Turks are as varied as Latins
good2goskee 7 months ago
@good2goskee Rus never Used but the Bulgars Turkeys were not Known but they had different names. Hun soldier dressed and fought like Turks huns nothing to do with eastern Germanic the Germanic tribes were foot soldiers. the names the Huns had you can find them in central asia. You mentioned mongol of course mongols share many genes with the Turks Because they were neighbours for long. conlutions Huns were from the steppes and they were Turks
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@SAMAND33 simply look at the relm of the Goths...it covers Central Asia right where the Huns were.
good2goskee 6 months ago
Comment removed
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@good2goskee The Hun Turks also invaded Afghanistan and Northen India(Pakistan Today) they were let by other men not Attlila.
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@good2goskee What you are saying is not official but I know the Goths camefrom the island of Gotland which is now sweden and nothing to do with central asia central asia was inhappited by Turkic and Iranic tribes. Turkic huns invaded europe when they trying to push the Iranic tribes westward. Iranic tribes like Scytho-Sarmatian or Alans.
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@SAMAND33 They origianally came from Sweden, into Russia, and into Western Asian covering areas north and around the Black Sea (my apologies I said Central Asia...I meant Western Asia). Where they conquered is consisered Cremia Tarter or Scythian territory in antiquity.As stated before there are strong lingusitic links to Huns
good2goskee 6 months ago
@good2goskee The way the historian described them is not the blondy swedish, specialy Greeks discribed them as The huns had wide shoulder and stretched small eyes typical early Turks and Mongol. Their bones were discored and genetically are Turk. Go to google look at genetic similarities between Turks and Huns the you will see. The way they fought is Turkic not Germanic. Tartars we the parts of Huns, dominated Eurasia until the Russians got gun powder technology.
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@SAMAND33 have you seen Finns?....not all are blond....many have stretched eyes. Also, to be Goth (visigoth or ostrogoths) doesn't mean you are of pure nordic stock. They conqured and mixed with many people (Euro, Rus, Tartar and other Asians) over centuries changing their looks and strategies. Looking at the monument to Atila in 'HUN'gian parliment, he doesn't look Seljuk Asian but rather very Euro in features. The Goths and others adapt to their environment and mix over time as others did.
good2goskee 6 months ago
Comment removed
SAMAND33 6 months ago
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@SAMAND33 Isn't language cool! Turkic is Altaic & melds with part of the Indo-Germanic liguistic family link. Hunnic is considered its own ethnic branch just as Mongols and Turkics and is part of that meld. I'm not saying Huns are Goths. I am saying they appear to be a hybrid. Similar to Turkics and Mongols being related. To say a Mongol is Turkic is simply wrong. To say a Persian is Turkic is wrong, to say a Hun is Goth is wrong but they are individual ethnics with those cultural influences
good2goskee 6 months ago
@good2goskee Huns were Turks and in Chinesse were called Hsiognu= Hunu in Latin and in English Hun. They come from central asia they were Turkic tribes. After years of struggle with China they moved to the west. They called Hun or Gogturk.
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@SAMAND33 That's great.....the reality is most Turks from Turkey will argue until they are blue in their face to convince themselves that somehow Huns and Ghengis Khan or anything that might be historically great &Turkic are direct reflections on Turkey. Its the Turkish education system that propogates this- I understand.
However, Turkic is as varied as being Latin (Romanian to Chilean). There are MANY credible easily found anthropologists & historians who challenge the Hunnic/Turkic notion
good2goskee 6 months ago
@good2goskee Turkish Education system is Good when it comes history. our system of education existed for many centuries since the seljuks and the ottomans. Come to Turkey bring your books and I am ready to show you many evidences. The Archiologist found corpses of Huns and Genetical are similar to that of the Turkic not Ugric or Germanic. Also the way their weopons designed is Turkic. Germanic swords were streight while huns swords were curved like that of the Turks.
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@SAMAND33 you guys have history... but the distinctive spin that Turks seem to put on it is very suspect. I see it over and over that is why I come to this conclusion
good2goskee 6 months ago
@good2goskee When you are doing history research you look many things in comparison .
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@good2goskee Magyars denied thier Turk origin but you can see my comment below that
In Turkish the possessive affix for the first person can take the following
forms after a consonant, abiding the vowel harmony with four forms:
-ım/im/üm/um
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@good2goskee
The vowel harmony or rule with four forms ( the affix vocal is set according to the vocal in the last syllable of the word) :
i type affix after e, i
ü after ö,ü
ı after a , ı
u after o,u
The sound harmony with two forms:
e after e, i, ö, ü
a after a, ı, o, u
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@good2goskee In Hungarian also the vowels can be interconnected through the laws of vowel harmony, the affixes can take two or three forms, usually agree with the last vowel in stem:
a, e (-ban,ben in ) , ((v)al,(v)el with), (ba,be into),(ra-re onto) á,é (nál,nél at),((v)á,(v)é into a) ó,ő (ból,ből from) (tól,től from nearby)
u,ü (ul,ül for ,by) o,e,ö (hoz,hez,höz to )
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@good2goskee Exemples: ház házban, kocsi kocsiban,mese mesében ,alma almában,víz vízben, film filmben tükör tükörben,kút kútban,
In Hungarian the possessive affix is –m, all stems with final a,e are altered in á,é before most affixes. The oblique stem is an exception : torok (throat) torkom (my throat) gyomor (stomach), gyomrom (my stomach),dal (song) dalom (my song),
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@good2goskee In Hungarian two plural are used –k : gyerek, gyerekek , the other plural -i is used only with person affixes, gyerekeimet my children, in accusative.
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@good2goskee Turkic People never came under thier enemy control . Finns and estonians are ural people and they were conquered by vikings. 90% of Finns are blond.
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@SAMAND33 are we understanding eachother properly? Are you saying the Goths never conquered anyone or controlled territory that were in Western Asia in antiquity of Turkic nature? Not that it is relavant but there are parts of Finnland which are 80% or more blond and parts that are less. Goth transition into western asia was not immediate to say they are nordics is like saying Mexicans are Spaniards. Mexicans are influenced by Spain and have Spainish roots mixed with others
good2goskee 6 months ago
@good2goskee Goths never said foot in central asia. The Goths as refugee fllee from Huns and the Romans opened the door for them. The Goths were 2 Visigoths and ostorgoths. So the flee to the west and south where they can survive remaining became slaves of Hun Turk. read history.
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@good2goskee Ostoro Goths felt to the south were they disappeared within Greek territory. and visigoths moved as far as west and reached spain and thier last king Redrique was slaughtered by the Arabs in 711 that is almost after 300 years of their exodus form east.
SAMAND33 6 months ago
@good2goskee My advice is go and visit cental Asia. You will find the evidence.
SAMAND33 8 months ago
Chinese is the best race upon this earth, the chinese defeated the Hun and chased them out of china till where they reside now in modern day eastern europe...the roman empire were destroyed by the hun but the hun was thoroughly defeated by the chinese and were forced to abandon their homeland in the altaic mountain area.
manchewl 9 months ago
Turkic slave! There is too great! Even their own home have been occupied by the Mongols and the Chinese people! Great stray dog!
ChineseHOME1 9 months ago
You call this history you mongolls you don't have history you are gayyyyy!!!!!
spirosmafia1 9 months ago
@spirosmafia1 your father is gay dumb fag what about your stupid xcountry's history?
huh
about stupid Spanish dick... travelling to america and killing inocent people there
dumb fag
Xxkingrx68 8 months ago
@spirosmafia1 your whole generation of family is gay
USA fag remember about the times you bitches made slaves of africans
you sons of a bitches racisst
Xxkingrx68 8 months ago
Video ile ilgili bir kaç eleştirim var. Öncelikle Büyük Hun İmparatorluğu unutulmuş, Avrupa Hun İmparatorluğundan itibaren devletler sayılmaya başlanmış.Büyük hükümdarlar içinde de Mete Han yani Oğuz Kağan unutulmuş ki destan yazmışız hakkında. Bunları da eklesen daha iyi olur
ssgkagan 10 months ago
guys don't get confused, Mongolia is a country but it is also a part of central Asia. and turks are also from same area, however if u say Turkestan it means all the central Asian countries. therefore people from central Asia share same gene same blood.Mongol fought Muslims and then later on they become Muslim after killing millions of Muslim they realize "ISLAM" is the way of life.however near about 70% of entire Asian populations are Muslim. So U can say it's a Muslim Continent.
PriceObAsia 10 months ago
Amir Temur was a Turk, the Barlas are a Turk clan, but part of Amir Temur maybe linked to the great khan.
papamiah 11 months ago
turks not mongol stupid....
thewoseone 11 months ago
Nationalist videos always amuse me no matter the country. They are always a mix of history turned into fairy tale, bad taste and hidden homophobia.
destihado1 11 months ago
nice video and world is waiting for you wake up again
shaair1 11 months ago
Chengiz Khan was purest Turk, at least more purest than modern day Turkish people from Turkey. Did his name Cengiz Khan do not telling you anything about his nationality? the word mongol is the same as bingol. you seems do not knows your own turk history, and moreover you have europ-centric complex thats why you do not want to have purest turk as your relative, you prefered to have greek of kurd.
MegaAmatullah 1 year ago
Ghengis khan was a Mongol & not a Turk.
lMitan 1 year ago
@lMitan is turk, we use this name often
xFantasyartx 1 year ago
@xFantasyartx Yes?
lMitan 1 year ago
@lMitan Mongols came from turks
MrThemartyr 11 months ago
@MrThemartyr u mean ''turks'' came from mongolia
lMitan 11 months ago
@MrThemartyr who cares both of same....
MrThemartyr 11 months ago
FUCK this video chingis haan is not fuckin turk!!!!!!!!!! he's a mongol
Chirkhai 1 year ago
@Chirkhai
yes he was
he was like 50/50 like many mongols and turks we are actually family from each other, that's why many turks in the north have chinese eyes
amjoi567890 1 year ago
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Chirkhai 1 year ago
Barbarian race!!!
badmatherfucker 1 year ago
HAIL PAN-TURKISHISM! THE TURK WILL COLLIDE WITH SHIITE IRANIAN... AND PAN IRANISM!!!
ELAZAR79
elazar79 1 year ago
Good music
TheZagros3000 1 year ago
Turkish Pride
molodoychelovek 1 year ago
I only have respect for Jingis khan, the rest is a bunch of wannabes,bllshit,asslickers
TheZagros3000 1 year ago
I don't see so much diffrent from the turkish islamists and the iranian regim, they both hide the truth. We KURDS will never give up matter what, you may call us terrorist, but for what?! For we fight to the right to speak our laguage,to have our right owned country?You mongols attacked the civilization while the world was calm. Mongols did nothing else than kill, ride horses and rape! For me thats barbarian,you steel others cultures.
TheZagros3000 1 year ago
@TheZagros3000 Turks did slave trade and fight to conquer on a era that those stuff were perfectly normal for every nation even the roman empire which is center of civilisation were running with slave trading but you Kurds claim we're barbarians ? Who raided raped and murdered over 60 tousand armenian when they banished from empire to the syria who's working as a follow up Asala the terrorist = PKK who killed tens of tousand civilians who's the biggest drug grp in the world its PKK again...
Regalya 1 year ago
@Regalya First of all PKK is not the biggest drug group, it don't any thing whi drugs to do so i don't know where you got that false info.Yes we killed armenians coz you said if we would we wood get a country but you lied!. You did much more than slave trade!! You burned land, rape as i said and much more.
TheZagros3000 1 year ago