I have sent links to someone was considering that the theory of "plonium halos" was true, but he goes on discussing the refutation.
He can't undesrtand that the theory of Gentry is made with unproven assumptions with plenty of flaws. He says "This is true", because Gentry of Joly said it; he doesn't understand it's just an assumption, he can't make the difference.
They don't get into peer review though. Unless it's creationist run, and nobody takes their bullshit seriously on an educational level. Thank you for the comments though, glad to have some activity again though I haven't done any real recent uploading.
I have sent links to someone was considering that the theory of "plonium halos" was true, but he goes on discussing the refutation.
He can't undesrtand that the theory of Gentry is made with unproven assumptions with plenty of flaws. He says "This is true", because Gentry of Joly said it; he doesn't understand it's just an assumption, he can't make the difference.
hunchbacked 3 years ago
I think that Aaronk1994 is just playing.
I can't take VenomFangX, coonkiller or AAronk1994 seriously.
They like playing the stars, they like the reactions they get.
I'm more concerned about pseudo-scientists like Rovert V Gentry who spread lies in scientific reviews.
hunchbacked 3 years ago
They don't get into peer review though. Unless it's creationist run, and nobody takes their bullshit seriously on an educational level. Thank you for the comments though, glad to have some activity again though I haven't done any real recent uploading.
AaronsBlackBox 3 years ago
He has since retracted that statement, completely.
ukchristian28 3 years ago
isn't an apology made null by inserting a but?
nadiaTeeze 3 years ago 2
or inserting a head into but.
unbeliever1000 3 years ago
Yes it is.
LittleTruckingBozo 3 years ago