The Pizza crust is the absolute perfect vessel for carrying tomatoe sauce, cheese, salami etc etc etc, even banana, if you pregnant ladies have got any weird cravings. Creating what is commonly known today as The Pizza. It comes in thick or thin crust, you can even get it with cheese stuffed into the crust, and it can even be folded over and called a calzonne.
Therefore, evolution is wrong, god created everything and you atheists fail again. Amen.
the site name "pulltheplugonatheism" is as rediculous as if there was a site "pulltheplugonreligion". Let's face it there will always be atheists and theists. I myself am an atheist and think Ray and any of his ilk(spelling) are narrowminded thoughtless sheep whose blind faith will hold them back as people. Live and let live. Don't attack us and we will leave you alone.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed in design or useless
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!
NOT ALL EVOLUTIONISTS even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. The bones are incomplete. There's no certainty of the bones belonging to the same creature. They can reconstruct whatever they want from these bones, and they have. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read my article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article that examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms and lack of sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
5:38 o, it okayz, afeeist hyoomanz... ceiling cat beeleebs in joo.
...
but yeah, seriously, christians. Sign up for the weekly email updates on whether or not Richard Dawkins has agreed to this thing. Remember to hold your breath while you wait or your wish won't come true!
Why do people still bother arging with bible thumping morons? Do they not get that it's a story book written by sheppards. Holy shit people are stupid.
The 4 dislikes must be for the editing of this video, you have to admit it is pretty sloppy. I dont see how any sane person could disagree with the content of the video.
My videos do get a bit better as they go along. To tell you the truth, I only joined youtube to comment on other people's videos. The ones I made are either out of boredom or just because I felt like making one.
@alienisuntverus I didnt mean anything bad by that. If i tried to make a video it would be unwatchable. haha I was just trying to find a reason why there would be any dislikes on the video. :D
Ray Comfort really did miss the point about banana hybridisation and it is an important point not even many evolutionists pick up on. Mankind adapted the living environment of the banana and they adapted to that environment. And that, by its very essence, IS evolution.
He he... I wonder what is Mr Comfort's 'explanation' for a coconut or walnuts or a jackfruit for that matter! .. if everything around us was made for our benefit, I guess God got a kick out of making poisonous mushrooms that look just like edible ones!
Thank you for your enlightenment. We all appreciate your basic understanding of mathematics and your will to inform the masses. You can be proud of yourself. You are a good person.
Dawkins went through years of studying evolutionary biology and it would seriously damage is reputation if he were to debate a 5 year old in a 50 year old body.
Also even though our fists form a sextagonal shape, it has nothing to do with the coincidence of the shape of the banana. But if we were all idiots it would clearly show that we derived not from a common ancestor of apes and humans but APES THEMSELVES AHAHAHAH!
Every time I think creationists can't get any stupider, someone like Ben Stein or Ray Comfort steps up and proves me wrong. I'm sure Richard Dawkins has mush better things to do then to explain basic things to an idiot. Richard Dawkins is much smarter then Ray will ever be, and Ray insists on debating him. Ray loses every argument on that subject, but he ignores it and continues to believe nonsence.
The full title of the book has been released. 'You can lead an atheist to half arsed bullshit anecdotal evidence but you can't make him think that your supernatural belief in fairies unicorns or sky-daddies is in any way a serious topic to be taught to our children as anything other than religious studies or that you 'believers' arenothing short of retarded.'
The title was a little less catchy like this but less likely to get you sued for false advertising
And I bet half the people that bought Ray's book were atheists that wanted a good laugh. Who needs comedy books when you have Ray Comfort? Although it irritates me that people believe that crap.
I've seen him. The video pales in comparison to Ray Comfort's though. Apparently Banana's are better for unintentional homo-eroticicm than peanut butter.
I think this bananaman is an atheist infiltrated among Christians in order to make them look like a bunch of stupid (Although I must accept they were already doing an excellent job without this guy)I will support you Ray! The atheist cause needs you.
These creationists need to begin thinking about their holy book, and the commandment "thou shalt not bear false witness". If they want people to continue taking the book seriously, they should begin adhering to it's tenets themselves.
@HimmiJoe Those people are called Apologists. They'll say anything they can if it defends their imaginary friend. Whether it's true or not is irrelevant to them as long as it has the potential to convert people to their bronze age beliefs.
Dawkins doesn't debate creationists because it is like playing chess with a pidgeon, it only knocks over all the pieces, shits on the board and then flies away with his friends claiming victory
hahaha, did the banana guy actually say big dogs designed to fit in a mans car. HA, if god does exists when he designed dogs (which were actually TAMED and BREEDED by MAN) cars weren't around, he needs to think before he speaks.
Any one who isn't familiar with the creation/evolution debate would be surprised. Especially when they are reassured by the creationists that the evolutionists are the frauds.
I don't see why Dawkins is so scared of Comfort, I have exactly the problem Ray Comfort has, I don't have a relevant PhD, or any relevant qualifications for that matter, I know nothing about any of the subjects I try to argue about, I can't be bothered to research anything properly, and I won't listen to anyone's arguments if they contradict my beliefs, but will Stephen Hawking debate me on singularity theory?
Dawkins isn't scared of Ray, he doesn't want to waste his time with someone who thought that bananas were created by God when when humans had well documented evidence of their domestication and inserted 50 pages of creationists bullshit into Darwin's Origin of Species and took out half of the chapters.
In other words, Dawkins doesn't want to debate an arrogant fool. On the other hand, there's a great video of Thunderf00t debating him!
nope, ray still looks like a retard. Sorry, you failed at your attempt to make him look better ... oh and by the way, we know ray is here to make money, and dumb ass christians buy up his bull shit
The Pizza crust is the absolute perfect vessel for carrying tomatoe sauce, cheese, salami etc etc etc, even banana, if you pregnant ladies have got any weird cravings. Creating what is commonly known today as The Pizza. It comes in thick or thin crust, you can even get it with cheese stuffed into the crust, and it can even be folded over and called a calzonne.
Therefore, evolution is wrong, god created everything and you atheists fail again. Amen.
Next week i will talk about hot dogs.
MrHaggis03 1 week ago
the site name "pulltheplugonatheism" is as rediculous as if there was a site "pulltheplugonreligion". Let's face it there will always be atheists and theists. I myself am an atheist and think Ray and any of his ilk(spelling) are narrowminded thoughtless sheep whose blind faith will hold them back as people. Live and let live. Don't attack us and we will leave you alone.
71TheHeretic 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed in design or useless
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE!
Mogley52 6 months ago
NOT ALL EVOLUTIONISTS even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. The bones are incomplete. There's no certainty of the bones belonging to the same creature. They can reconstruct whatever they want from these bones, and they have. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read my article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
Mogley52 6 months ago
@Mogley52 apes did evolve from a four legged creature
stoltobot 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article that examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms and lack of sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 6 months ago
you just cannot debate with someone who is absolutely ignorant of the topic they say they want to debate
comfort already proved he doesn't research - with his banana fiasco
GodsArePeopleToo 8 months ago
5:38 o, it okayz, afeeist hyoomanz... ceiling cat beeleebs in joo.
...
but yeah, seriously, christians. Sign up for the weekly email updates on whether or not Richard Dawkins has agreed to this thing. Remember to hold your breath while you wait or your wish won't come true!
zEropoint68 8 months ago
Why do people still bother arging with bible thumping morons? Do they not get that it's a story book written by sheppards. Holy shit people are stupid.
MrJIMMY3009 9 months ago
The 4 dislikes must be for the editing of this video, you have to admit it is pretty sloppy. I dont see how any sane person could disagree with the content of the video.
Chilldudeski 9 months ago 3
@Chilldudeski
My videos do get a bit better as they go along. To tell you the truth, I only joined youtube to comment on other people's videos. The ones I made are either out of boredom or just because I felt like making one.
alienisuntverus 9 months ago
@alienisuntverus I didnt mean anything bad by that. If i tried to make a video it would be unwatchable. haha I was just trying to find a reason why there would be any dislikes on the video. :D
Chilldudeski 9 months ago
Ray Comfort really did miss the point about banana hybridisation and it is an important point not even many evolutionists pick up on. Mankind adapted the living environment of the banana and they adapted to that environment. And that, by its very essence, IS evolution.
ThomasTrue 9 months ago
The shape of a banana??? You have got to be kidding me. What does he say about the shape of a penis?
cochranexyz 9 months ago 2
@cochranexyz
I'd like to see him explain coconuts.
alienisuntverus 9 months ago 6
@alienisuntverus LOL. Bring tears your eyes.
cochranexyz 9 months ago
@alienisuntverus Or durian, he’d probably say they are the devils fruit or something stupid like that
foiran 9 months ago
@alienisuntverus Shit, try a watermelon or cherries, the one with the seeds.
HimesInu 8 months ago
@cochranexyz
the shape of a penis
erect or flaccid?
proof there is no god surely as an inteliigent designer would surely have placed it in a less vulnerable place
unless of course 'god' had people evolve from something that walked on all fours
whitesquirrel7 6 months ago
thunderfoot pwned this retard
bellyzbad 10 months ago
If god really truly existed. Then their would be no atheist.
bottlecapbill19 11 months ago
The banana: Prove that Eru Ilúvatar created the world from the song of the Valor. Repent! and travel west to the undieing lands!
Felhaven 11 months ago
He he... I wonder what is Mr Comfort's 'explanation' for a coconut or walnuts or a jackfruit for that matter! .. if everything around us was made for our benefit, I guess God got a kick out of making poisonous mushrooms that look just like edible ones!
tuhinz 11 months ago
0:25 is that thunderf00t?
MrAwesomesauce101 1 year ago
@MrAwesomesauce101
It is.
Quintinohthree 10 months ago
The coconut is proof that the Almighty God wants us to starve.
torchss 1 year ago 2
@torchss Coconut juice is actually very healthy but coconut juice without any food=the shits.
lilsm555 1 year ago
1:18 x= -2, -3. Sorry, couldn't resist.
Gerstein1 1 year ago
@Gerstein1
Thank you for your enlightenment. We all appreciate your basic understanding of mathematics and your will to inform the masses. You can be proud of yourself. You are a good person.
klootzakisme 1 year ago
This is sad. After accusing Dawkins of quote mining, he quote mines Dawkins. What a retard
AboyNAmEDsued 1 year ago
@AboyNAmEDsued Yes, he is a sad little man with no abilites in reason.
ETericET 1 year ago
1:08 that women is smarter then ALL creationists combined, i mean just look at the moon and a elephant, its obvious that the elephant is bigger
blazereef 1 year ago
Dawkins went through years of studying evolutionary biology and it would seriously damage is reputation if he were to debate a 5 year old in a 50 year old body.
Also even though our fists form a sextagonal shape, it has nothing to do with the coincidence of the shape of the banana. But if we were all idiots it would clearly show that we derived not from a common ancestor of apes and humans but APES THEMSELVES AHAHAHAH!
hanarky 1 year ago
okay please now stop with your cuts in the video, that's really annoying.
jeanbaboul 1 year ago
Arrrggghh!!!!!!
Every time I think creationists can't get any stupider, someone like Ben Stein or Ray Comfort steps up and proves me wrong. I'm sure Richard Dawkins has mush better things to do then to explain basic things to an idiot. Richard Dawkins is much smarter then Ray will ever be, and Ray insists on debating him. Ray loses every argument on that subject, but he ignores it and continues to believe nonsence.
uncr3ativename 1 year ago
The full title of the book has been released. 'You can lead an atheist to half arsed bullshit anecdotal evidence but you can't make him think that your supernatural belief in fairies unicorns or sky-daddies is in any way a serious topic to be taught to our children as anything other than religious studies or that you 'believers' arenothing short of retarded.'
The title was a little less catchy like this but less likely to get you sued for false advertising
sum1otosh1 1 year ago
@sum1otosh1 I think that title is really catchy.
And I bet half the people that bought Ray's book were atheists that wanted a good laugh. Who needs comedy books when you have Ray Comfort? Although it irritates me that people believe that crap.
uncr3ativename 1 year ago
lol, the title of the website at the end just guarantees that any debate to follow would be free of any bias to a particular side
bobplatypus 1 year ago
@TheMrDeist I think it'd actually be more like Comfort is a piñata, and Dawkins is a kid with access to nukes.
UnderlordZ 1 year ago
JUST PLAY THE FUCKING VIDEO
ChrisWales22 1 year ago
@squeezycheeseypeas
Never underestimate the stupidity of creationists.
alienisuntverus 1 year ago 18
@alienisuntverus seen the peanut butter guy lol? watch?v=LrLFHghgdh4&feature=related
riskingeuphoria 8 months ago
@riskingeuphoria
I've seen him. The video pales in comparison to Ray Comfort's though. Apparently Banana's are better for unintentional homo-eroticicm than peanut butter.
alienisuntverus 8 months ago
I think this bananaman is an atheist infiltrated among Christians in order to make them look like a bunch of stupid (Although I must accept they were already doing an excellent job without this guy)I will support you Ray! The atheist cause needs you.
reker64 1 year ago 2
goddamn when will creationist and religious people learn
patrickledford420 1 year ago
These creationists need to begin thinking about their holy book, and the commandment "thou shalt not bear false witness". If they want people to continue taking the book seriously, they should begin adhering to it's tenets themselves.
HimmiJoe 1 year ago
@HimmiJoe Those people are called Apologists. They'll say anything they can if it defends their imaginary friend. Whether it's true or not is irrelevant to them as long as it has the potential to convert people to their bronze age beliefs.
TheHomelessCripple 1 year ago
Dawkins doesn't debate creationists because it is like playing chess with a pidgeon, it only knocks over all the pieces, shits on the board and then flies away with his friends claiming victory
Piersmaru 1 year ago
hahaha, did the banana guy actually say big dogs designed to fit in a mans car. HA, if god does exists when he designed dogs (which were actually TAMED and BREEDED by MAN) cars weren't around, he needs to think before he speaks.
imthecaptainofabus 2 years ago 6
@imthecaptainofabus
Hey now, remember. This is coming from a guy who said bananas were designed by god for your hand, mouth,...and ass.
alienisuntverus 2 years ago 3
@imthecaptainofabus its physically impossible for creationist to think
patrickledford420 1 year ago
@imthecaptainofabus
he needs to think before he speaks,
so we can expect total silence from him then
whitesquirrel7 1 year ago
Is anyone really surprised when a creationist lies?
Jonnarra 2 years ago 15
Any one who isn't familiar with the creation/evolution debate would be surprised. Especially when they are reassured by the creationists that the evolutionists are the frauds.
alienisuntverus 2 years ago
They`re avin a laugh ain`t they?
peteq1972 2 years ago
I don't see why Dawkins is so scared of Comfort, I have exactly the problem Ray Comfort has, I don't have a relevant PhD, or any relevant qualifications for that matter, I know nothing about any of the subjects I try to argue about, I can't be bothered to research anything properly, and I won't listen to anyone's arguments if they contradict my beliefs, but will Stephen Hawking debate me on singularity theory?
WaIterEgo 2 years ago 2
Dawkins isn't scared of Ray, he doesn't want to waste his time with someone who thought that bananas were created by God when when humans had well documented evidence of their domestication and inserted 50 pages of creationists bullshit into Darwin's Origin of Species and took out half of the chapters.
In other words, Dawkins doesn't want to debate an arrogant fool. On the other hand, there's a great video of Thunderf00t debating him!
alienisuntverus 2 years ago
Yeah! well Ray comfort talks so much bull shit maybe his 'new' chapter should be dubed 'the origin of feces"
WaIterEgo 2 years ago
nope, ray still looks like a retard. Sorry, you failed at your attempt to make him look better ... oh and by the way, we know ray is here to make money, and dumb ass christians buy up his bull shit
givingmantoo 2 years ago
He always looked like a retard.
alienisuntverus 2 years ago
why did you take the video off
Leeroypwns 2 years ago
I had to fix a few minor problems like the speed of the text and stuff like that.
alienisuntverus 2 years ago