One thing this pilot is not considering is if they lined up from further away at a slower speed like 400-450 MPH then full throttled the engines for the last mile or so what ever would be needed to bring up to speed (and you can hear the engines roaring full throttle on the 2nd plane that hits the south tower on multiple videos) Come on people think!! Nobody said the were making those turns and flew the planes at 550 MPH the entire trip. Even I know how to throttle up one of those planes!
paranoid idiots. people who actually want to think rationally about these consp theories should go to ItWasTyped. com .. the FACTS on conspiracy theories
The Pentagon wasnt hit by a 757. The second tower was hit by a military plane. Leaders of this country are fucking retards for trying to hide what really is going on. Bin Laden was obviously someone to blame for our governments stupid actions.
I totally believe this Pilot. I do think the terrorists were on the planes (some of them- obviously not the ones that are turning up alive) & once at a certain point the planes were guided by remote.(from people on the ground/ in d.c./ where-ever.) Remote/radio control (invented by Nikola Tesla) is very common w/planes these days. Landing a jumbo jet is now 3 buttons w/computer assist (from the ground).Test footage of plane crashes/cabin burning cameras w/dummies inside are done w/r.control.
I totally believe this Pilot. I do think the 'terrorists' were on the planes (some of them- obviously not the ones that are turning up alive) & once at a certain point the planes were guided by remote.(from people on the ground/ in d.c./ where-ever.) Remote/radio control (invented by Nikola Tesla) is very common w/planes these days. Landing a jumbo jet is now 3 buttons w/computer assist (from the ground).Test footage of plane crashes/cabin burning cameras w/dummies inside are done w/r.control.
The whole damn thing is one big set up from beggining to end. Are there people in this country still that dellusional and utterly nieve to believe the governments fairy tale for this evil satanic con job?
@AnAscendingAngel you cant land an aircraft going 500 mph, and what he is saying is you cant make a quick descend into the building going 500 mph, which is beyond the capable speed these commercial air craft can go
Pentagon hit by missile! WTC 1 and 2 hit by military craft fitted with incendiary devices on the bottom flown by RC! (flight 93) never crashed, it was diverted to and landed at an airforce base. WTC 7 hit by Nothing!
Some of you need to look at some of the videos and 'notice' the planes, they look like military planes from the bottom, check it out. We've been screwed over my friends and I was one who it took 10 years to believe this.
If an Airbus at take-off speed can perform like this, why couldn';t the planes on Sept 11th?!
The pilot being interviewed had years of flight and navigation training and was taught not to stress the aircraft.
The terrorists didn't care.
They didn't need to land, they didn't care about stressing the aircraft, and the buildings they hit were easily identifiable objects visible from many miles away and only needed basic navigation to get to the area and target visually.
@Cliffjumper24 /wiki/Airbus_A320_family third way down page """"operated with an Airbus A319-132 EI-EDM landed short of the runway and broke an undercarriage when the aircraft attempted landing at Palermo Airport, Italy."""" airplanes fall apart at the littlest of things and you think they can cut through steel building like butter, and hit the pentagon after sliding on the floor.
google bird damage to planes, and see what those feathery little soft objects can do to a plane.
As for Birdstrikes, they rarely do any serious damage.
Unless they hit windshields (which can blind pilots), or hit the radome (a fibreglass panel covering the radar), or worst of all, get ingested by the engines (such as caused the NYC Hudson river crash landing), birds do little more than leave a dent in an aircraft.
FUCK YOU. The fucking terrorists that flew those planes, learned how to fly at Briscoe Field; the airport for Gwinnett County in Georgia. I live 10 min away from there. I take lessons there. I've met the guy who taught those terrorists how to fly. He said he was great pilot and all you really need is to be good at flying a cessna to fly a 767/757, not like a pro but just enough to where you can bank and keep it level.
ah yeh, thousands of cameras directed to the manhattan skyline, even the government back then wouldnt be so stupid to fire a missile and then rely on the FBI collecting all videos , jesus christ, you guys crack me up
rumsfield reports 2.3 trillion dollars the pentagon cant account for on sept 10th, 2001. the next day guess what makes headlines. y9dnkbe is right. the missile took out the accounting dept and files of where our 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS of our tax payers money went., don't believe me? its on a lot of sites, google it. cbs even comes up
What is still up with Ameriduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh!!!! 10 yrs and still denial, you cannot debunk reality, not even in Ameriduh! 767 PILOT says no, sheeple with no clue say yes, pilot gets my vote, the one on here who actually knows what the fuck he is talking about.TtWwAaTtSs!!
@Sept11IsALie right, so let me get this straight this licensed trained pilot says no way, so do you think he can do it? interesting he didnt bring up the fact that the hijackers were trained pilots in 767 simulators and logged over 500 hrs of flight in 2000. so believe the licensed pilot or believe the hijacked licensed pilot? and were the sheep?
@Sept11IsALie Yeah, it's pretty discouraging that these "debunkers' still believe the official fairytale, despite the preponderance of evidence to the contrary. Even the speed of the 2nd "plane" is up for debate, as none of the official bodies who weighed in on the question, could agree on one speed! MIT, FBI, NIST, FAA, NTSB, etc.--none could agree on one speed!
Hell, they can't even agree on whether the plane was flying level, or dive bombing--and the fake pictures reflect that! FKN BULLSHIT!
what more evidence do u dumb fucks need it was an inside job!!! u dumbass's people are being brainwashed by our stupid government! people are just afraid of the turth!
All of the 9-11 pilots had valid FAA commercial licensence's and could have been hired by any carrier as a pilot. Flight 77 was witnessed crashing by hundreds and the supposed 'impossible' flight maneuvers are established from the recovered flight recorder, found at the pentagon. Truthers are morons...uninformed morons
The alleged hijackers flying the plane like this is the equivalent of me getting my learner's permit in a Honda with automatic transmission, and then the next day winning the Daytona 500. But hey, I guess this pilot is just a "kook" who "hates Amurika" and "wants to hug a terrorist".
Well, I don't think flying a jumbo jet can be so hard, especially if you have its pilot at gun point for any advice! Anyone ever tried to fly a jumbo on FSX? Trust me, if you like jets, or you think allah will like you more if you fly them, it's easy. It WOULD be difficult to land it, but that was not necessary after all...
oh yea.. right.. so The US Military just let... you know.. a few jet liners fly around the capitol for almost an hour without being intercepted at all.. .. yeah right.
I feel sorry for the brain washed thick heads - some will never wake up.
@merkabah2 This is a different conversation. I was only replying on the "is a jumbo jet easy to fly" thing. On the thick head case, I believe we all are kinda thick heads on 9/11 and other similar events because we will NEVER know EXACTLY what hapenned... Hell, we are not even sure about the circumstances surrounding Bin Laden's death... 2011? 2002? When did the man die? So we can only speculate.. :)
Get ready for the new false flag coming soon from the united states of america. Pakistan watch out because america want something. America fuck me your sick.
I saw someone land a plane in about 20 feet of space (viral video actually). These guys spent their life preparing. I know 14 year olds who can pull that off from years of Flight Simulator/video games.
From what I understand, that is what these guys did too.
How many times a day do people fly planes into buildings... But everybody seems to know exactly what should and shouldn't occur when somebody they don't know does.
@Bruinsrule100 Real question is.. How many times a day do ppl get billion dollar insurances for their buildings a week or 2 before they are hit with a plane? how many times a day do they change highjacking rules to where someon like bush has to make the call to shoot it down instead of the military? and why would they let a plane with 100 ppl fly into buildings with 10's of thousands of ppl? Its pretty obvious bush did it or you guys are by far the dumbest fkn ppl on earth to let that happen
Here here. Exactly what i been trying to tell people but they dont listen. Amature pilots with very little training could not have flown them planes that good.
@gentjt38 the other day i thought and said to my friend. 'do you really think some terrorists could have hijacked a plane and been able to drive it so accurately into the towers?' we thought NO. this is funny and america is a sick sick country.
The WTC complex was an enormous architectural white elephant filled with asbestos that needed removal and with far too few tenants. The WTC had been built too large & strong, the cost of deconstruction, an estimated 15 billion, far outweighed whatever profit an owner might gain from years of ownership. But a buyer did step forward. Larry Silverstein, and purchased the property, maybe with the foresight the towers would be a good target for a false flay operation - Like the USS LIBERTY
@wastedwasted3 -- NO, you don't understand the flight characteristics involved. 500 knots is like 150 knots OVER the design specs, the wings would fail. The 5 or 6-G banking turns are virtually impossible to execute. Those are SOME of the reasons most commercial pilots cannot accept the official narrative as given. The more one looks at the improbabilities, inconsistencies, quirks, impossibilities & unanswered qustions, the more one is forced to conclude the 911 official explanation is BULLSHIT.
@wastedwasted3 people like you always try to find some BS "rational" explaination for the unexplainable. you have no way of knowing what the truth is yet you've actually convinced yourself that your OPINION is an absolute fact. lmfao. those idiots could not have possibly set those plane to auto pilot. you, me nor any untrained person could never fly a plane that accurately even if auto-pilot was engaged and especially at those speeds. please go buy yourself a clue.
@jww312 they trained at flight school dick and had aircraft manuals. anyway we both agree we have no knowledge of how to pilot an aircraft - i was throwing some bait out to either be confirmed or disconfirmed
@wastedwasted3 if it were that easy, why do they pay pilots big money? Why wouldn't they just hire some kid out of highschool at Min. wage who played simulator on his computer for a couple of years? stop being a sellout, you sockpuppet.
Do people really think manipulating the controls of a jet requires skill??? When you're going to die anyway, a couple hours playing with flight simulator is all you need to prepare.
They weren't jet pilots, and they didn't have to be. In fact, they didn't have to know about a single system on those planes to simply steer them into the towers. Any student cessna pilot could pull it off.
@JP84CE1 = another sock puppet, you know when the sock puppets are spamming a vid, that it is real and is the truth. You guys are making this vid a no brainer, this guy is telling the truth and you sockpuppets are paid to discredit it, you dummies. You are making what he says TRUE and obviously TRUE with your poor deflunking. How dumb can you be?
Google Bertha Champagne and learn about her mysterious death, and the failure of the media to EVEN report it!
The Washington Post was the only newspaper to report it, and they waited almost a week to do so, and tried to bury the story on page 3 of the Metro section!
The Fairfax County, Virginia Police website didn't even mention Marvin Bush.
Bertha was the nanny to son Walker, and daughter Marshall...geez, if they'd had anymore kids, they probably would've named them Texas and Ranger!
@y9dnkbe It was a missile! If you look at the footage the FBI actually DID release...despite the numerous cameras on the Pentagon AND surrounding area (all video confiscated by the FBI)...you can see the telltale squiggle of a missile exhaust!
There is no freakin' way a 767 could crash into a building without scorching the ground (at least!), and without leaving any evidence of itself!
Just by coincidence, whatever punched that neat hole through several walls, took out the accounting dept.,
@Bongofury361 Really? Maybe you should let the C 130 pilot who was asked by air traffic control to look out for the plane (which he did). Then followed it as it banked and dove straight in to the Pentagon. And he reported it LIVE as it happened.
And its on Youtube!!
You might want to let him know that it was a missile.. Like HOLY SHIT. Who'd a thunk it??? Wow your amazing!!
@lingojac Wow, I know you debunkers are mentally challenged, but you are the FIRST person to suggest the impact was hundreds of feet in the air! What was hundreds of feet in the air...the pentagon?
You are talking about the pentagon, right?
Are you saying that missiles can't be programmed to explode later?
As for knowing it was the accounting department, it's called RESEARCH!
@Bongofury361 The WTC towers were around 1300 feet at their roofs, I don't think my estimation was that far off. But I guess some of us are pickier than others.
Yes, I'm sure missiles can be "programmed to explode later". That ability doesn't count as evidence, genius.
I don't care where the accounting department was, I was being sarcastic and disregarding that point of yours as irrelevant, because it is.
You don't know anything about structures and are resorting to missile theories. Idiot.
@lingojac How could the accounting dept be irrelevant? Rumsfeld said the day before 9/11 that 2.3 TRILLION was missing from the pentagon and that spot that was hit on 9/11 was where they were doing the accounting discovery to find out where that money went. Out of all the places the 'plane' could have hit the pentagon, it picks that spot? WOW, what another coincidence, huh? And you say it is irrelevant, I think your deflunking is irrelevant. Ya sockpuppet.
@lingojac Oh, you're talking about Flight 93 that allegedly crashed in Shanksville...but the impact was with the ground (that's the official story), not up in the air! Man, you are confused!
@Bongofury361 YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT! SHUT THE FUCK UP! IT WASNT A MISSLE YOU RETARD IT WAS A FUCKING PLANE! GROW THE FUCK UP AND REALIZE THAT 2000 PEOPLE DIED IN ONE MORNING. NO SHIT IT DESTROYED AN ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT, THE WHOLE FUCKING BUILDING COLLAPSED ALONG WITH 2000 LIVES! AND NO EVIDENCE? WE HAVE 2000 AMERICANS DEAD AND 4 HOLES IN THE GROUND! OUR GOVENMENT SHOULD KILL YOU AND EVERY OTHER RETARD INBRED INSECT LIKE YOU! YOUR JUST AS GOOD AS OSAMA BIN LADEN WHO CLAIMED RESPONSIBILITY!
@videocritic8888 Wow! First-of-all, you need to get your doc to up the strength of your meds, as they are obviously not working anymore! Secondly, you need to get your facts straight, as the official total of dead was closer to 3,000! Thirdly, the pentagon did NOT collapse completely, but the accounting dept. was taken out, destroying the evidence of the $2.3 trillion that went missing!
OBL never claimed responsibility for 911, only CIA faked videos did!
@GoPensGo377 Hey, what debunker did you parrot that bullshit statistic from? Since when is aluminum able to penetrate through several rings of steel re-enforced concrete, hmm? You're aware that planes are primarily aluminum, right? MAYBE NOT!
Tell you what...how about YOU grow a fucking brain, you dumb fucker!
It's assholes like you that are complicit in the Crime of The 21st century, because of your sheer stupidity!
Only an idiot in serious denial would believe the official fairytale!
@GoPensGo377 I'm sure the families are well aware of alternative theories, and don't have a problem with them. What does alternative theories have to do with the victims? NOTHING!
I'm sure they would want the REAL PERPETRATORS to be brought to justice, instead of the situation you have now---where NOBODY has been brought to justice--except Moussaoui--who was just a plant to corroborate the official fairytale!
Only you brain dead debunkers can compare apples to oranges--and come up with lemons!
@Bongofury361 please tell me your thoery?, apples to oranges and get lemons? seems the only people who cant agree on anything are the theorists, theorists are denying reports of other theorists beliefs, you could compare apples to oranges and get your elbow in your ass
@BoardFlipper5150 I believe drones or remote controlled military jets were used--disguised, of course--to strike the towers, hence the need for video fakery to cover that up.
Just because those who seek the truth have varying theories, it does not change the fact that the official fairytale is IMPOSSIBLE!
Since you (and all your other "debunker" friends) have intellectually lobotomized yourselves, why not ram 8 inch replicas of the towers up your noses, and do it right?
@Bongofury361 I never said it was impossible, i said not 1 theorist can present a solid case, all i've seen from theorists its twisting official storys, and misquoting constantly, in fact bermas and avery both on TV quoted then showed the video to suppor t their claim and not once in the video did the quoter ever say what avery quoted. You need facts, you need evidence and so far no theorists have come forward with any except misquotes and blasting expert testamony.
@Bongofury361 what video fakery? In order to use drones or military jets the cover up would go deeper, airports, citizens, customers who flew on that plane earlier in the day, bottom line how is the official fairytale impossible when credible experts support it, 800 (global)experts that dont believe is is less than 1% of the 1.2 million in the US alone not to mention international.NIST not a government supported company but contracted by the government no more than you or I could hire them for
@Bongofury361 do you know how far the cover up would have to go to use that? secret doesnt mean bringing airports and citizens into the cover up. I dont see how its impossible when multiple experts have supported the conclusion of NIST, which is not government operated but was contracted by gov't no more than you or I could hire them if we had the money. what TV fakery was there? cause im pretty sure i watched a 767 fly into a building, you say theres missle exhaust yet dont believe it could
@BoardFlipper5150 exhaust from anything else, like a plane maybe? or the 136 witnesses that saw the plane fly into the pentagon, citizens stuck in traffic lying? what citizen could live with the biggest event in US history knowing its a lie and his fellow citizens would not be brought justice, all for a tax break or a pay off? which makes the citizens who your tryin to bring to justice no different than the gov't, the truth is you have no facts or evidence to support your claims, we do
@BoardFlipper5150 Yeah, I've heard this argument many times...that the amount of people involved in a cover-up would number in the thousands, and would be impossible to keep secret, but...the Manhattan Project involved thousands and they kept that secret!
I think it would be pretty easy to keep people quiet if gov't types let it be known they know where you live, who your family is, etc.
Who were these experts that supported NISTs findings...Popular Mechanics? Don't make me laugh!
@BoardFlipper5150 "which is not government operated but was contracted by gov't no more than you or I could hire them if we had the money." What-the-hell were you saying here, as I can't make heads or tails of this statement?!
The NIST report is so severely flawed, it isn't worth the paper it was written on!
What is this conclusion you refer to? There was NO conclusion, as they didn't finish the job--their "investigation" only goes to the point of collapse, and that's it!
@BoardFlipper5150 Dude...do some REAL investigation...don't pull a NIST, a FEMA, or a 911 commission by ignoring the evidence!
Just ask yourself: why was there so much resistance to an investigation by the white house? Why were all the official "investigations" so obviously flawed, to the point of being laughable? Why did it take NIST so many years to complete their fiction, but they only allowed for 3 weeks of review? Why did NIST refuse to meet Dr. with Stephen Jones to address problems?
@Bongofury361 real investigation? there was no resistance into the investigation, NIST signed the contract less than a year after the attacks to investigate. NIST doesnt need to meet with mr. jones, why would they? Jones tests on aluminum were conducted at 800 degrees which aluminum does melt at a silver color, BUT in 1200 degrees aluminum melts to a yellow/red/orange. have a look for yourself drjudywooddotcom/articles/aluminum/Aluminum_Glows.html
@BoardFlipper5150 so ah there's my real investigation, your supporting someone that retracted his statement and said the molten metal could be aluminum, "Steven Jones identified this material as looking "silvery," implying that he, too, thought it could be aluminum.(mp3) However, the point is that no one is really sure. Can you tell by looking at it what metal it is, especially if you don't know the temperature of it? What has slopped over onto the sides and cooled does indeed look "silvery."
@GoPensGo377 Yeah, and according to you "debunkers", 95% of the "plane" alleged to have crashed in Shanksville was recovered! Gee, what a coincidence!
As far as growing up goes...you need to grow a brain and accept the fact that your gov't doesn't give a shit about it's people, especially as it has been hijacked by zionist jews who only care about israel!
All you fucking ostriches need to open your eyes, ears and minds to the preponderance of evidence that 911 was an israeli/mossad inside job!!!
It's disconcerting to see an airline pilot with no common sense. If the planes can't fly these so called impossible g turns he talks about then no one could fly them. They obvious did fly and didn't break up and were crashed into the building which means the g forces were not excessive. QED. Talking about 'vertical and lateral navigating' the plane (moving the wheel back forward, left or right ) as if this was some kind of high art is nonsense, doubly so coming from someone with his experience.
@cwlldoran I am not a pilot so do not claim expertise here. But a friend of mine took off, flew and landed a 737 (in a simulator mind you) with ZERO training!! Some crazed terrorist is not exactly worried about the airplanes "envelope". They are hell bent on hitting the target (which 40 videos clearly show). With GPS co ords put in to the computer how hard is it to punch the throttles to full power pick a line on VFR and its.. WTC dead ahead!! It CAN be done and was!!
@lingojac are you seriously fucking kidding me, ha, the NIST report is bullshit, no matter how many times you read it it will always be total utter bollocks, NIST= "Nothing Inside Spreads Truth" Listen to The PILOT who knows alot more than you about flying, get your head out your ass and wipe that shit out your eyes then you will see what we do, give your mouth a wipe aswell cause by fuck you talk shit, debunk that!
40 videos prove what? That planes hit the towers. We have no proof terrorists were on board unless you count Atta's miraculous passport found on the street near WTC. They used fucking drones and landed the people in Cleveland. Read about the social security index and the oddities of the passengers on those planes and have of those passengers were gov. employees or had affiliations. Check out the Mark Bingham bullshit story. "Hi Mom, This is Mark Bingham" lol
@DrugstoreCFH Oh really!! perhaps you might want to call up Lisa Frost's parents and tell them that. knowing she is safe and sound instead of being scraped up in bits from the WTC (which she was!!) is such a better ending than what happened. Oh.. and the terrorists were confirmed by the stewardesses on the planes..
While i respect this fellows opinions there are 50 videos that say he is wrong. And as far as flying goes the terrorists were trained on commercial jets and all passed. A friend of mine with ZERO pilot training was able to take off and land a 737 in a simulator. Whats the big deal about aiming the plane at the target and punching the throttles to full power? If you got GPS co ords (which I am sure they did) its POSSIBLE. And 40 videos prove it.
@roquefortfiles and 40 videos prove it? They prove that a plane (at least one) hit the WTC. They did not prove who drove them. In fact nothing proves who flewthem, except for the unharmed passport of one of the "terrorists" found in the reckage. As far as I'm concerned after about 20 hours of watching various videos over the last few days, 9/11 was an inside job and us trained pilots could well have flown the planes.
@ps2nolimits Well considering the hijackers were confirmed in their seat numbers by Stewardesses on board thru airfones (Betty Ong?) and Dave Bottiglia (air traffic controller) had on board transmissions from an Arabic guy in Capts seat several times. And Logan airport confirmed they boarded. Not sure why that is such a toughie for you. When you get cross referenced confirmations i think we are getting in to "unreasonable" arguments.
@ps2nolimits Inside job hm? Well. How would explain the following. I recently watched a very good documentary on the CBC of a guy who is now a cab driver in Yemen. Hard core Islamist, used to be Bin Laden's body guard and an Alqaida member. All the traditional robes and sandals type. He said he personally knew all the hijackers and held many dinners for them prior to them leaving on their mission.
Now. I don't see George Bush and Dick Cheney calling this guy up to "help out" on 911.
@roquefortfiles I've watched many good videos and documentaries on why 9/11 was not a "terrorist" attack as well....what makes "your" documentaries so truthful over the ones I've watched. It's more common sense than anything else anyways once you look at all the evidence. What are the odds some guy who happened to have dinner with all of the "hijackers" came forward and told CBS that he was bin laden's bodyguard and that he knew the "hijackers"...Frankly very slim...unless he was an actor
@ps2nolimits No no no no no!! The CBC does not work on BS documentaries for one. And they don't spend their time researching, traveling, and interviewing.. "ACTORS". Give me fucking break!! The CBC is one of the most HARDCORE doc producers!. All i can say is the overwhelming sense i got from it was.. "If this guy knows the hijackers how on EARTH can their be a conspiracy?" You are not going to have Islamic militants and the Bush government working together. Sorry that don't compute!!
@ps2nolimits Yes it is more common sense than anything!! The CBC are SCRUPULOUSLY picky about their documentaries. They do not produce "Puff" pieces. In fact much of their stuff leans toward being a little TOO bland at times. They showed him with Bin Laden!! He is an Alqaida member. Actor?? (come on!!).
So dismiss it all you want.. But think for JUST a second. Say the guy is the real deal. Kind of throws the whole conspiracy thing out the window!!
It would definitely be somewhat of a "blow" to the people who believe that 9/11 was an inside job. But not completely in my mind. You ever know if these "Al-Qaeda" members were really working for some terrorist group or the US itself. Personally I have very little faith in the government to give us the whole truth on anything and I believe with all their power, they can easily manipulate the minds of the majority and pull off a fake terrorist attack.
@ps2nolimits I kind of side with Richard Clarke on this when he said. "The government is not that organized". One or two people conspiracy sure that's believable. But not when it involves HUNDREDS. You would have to have Air traffic control, air controllers on and on all in on it. That is not reasonable or believable in the slightest.
@roquefortfiles Eh, I believe it can. I feel that if people are brainwashed enough/in fear of losing their job enough, masses of them will go along with corrupt ideas.
@ps2nolimits Whatever! You think that people like Ben Sliney (head of air traffic control) or Dave Bottiglia (Controller) don't understand when they are not talking to the pilot? Or an Arabic guy keying a mic and saying.. "Be quiet stay in your seats if you try to make any moves...". You think people like this are wrong or incorrect about doing their jobs?
I don't!!
And these people would HAVE to be in on it all. I think it is ridiculous personally.
@roquefortfiles I'm just saying I don't view that as ridiculous. The gov't has as IMMENSE amount of power over the people living under it, by its rules. If 9/11 was an inside job, the head of air traffic control in my opinion would have to be in on it and I don't see what is so far fetched about it. There's more evidence that 9/11 was a controlled demolition and that the investigation was half-assed than that it was simply a terrorist attack.
@ps2nolimits I have video taped a controlled demolition for a television station (the entire process) Let me tell you from experience that there is NO WAY!! NO WAY!! that anyone could possibly confuse a controlled demolition for something else. The cut charges going off are INCREDIBLY loud. I am not talking a few bangs here boom there. I am talking about MASSIVELY loud bangs that shake you to the core!! My camera audio that day could not be confused. And none of that happened at WTC!!
@ps2nolimits Ben Sliney?? come on!! That would then mean Dave Bottiglia is in it. All the controllers are in on it. They all work in the same space. These people show up to work and go home to families with this big dark ugly secret of "Helping out" 9/11? Come on!! Rubbish!! You believe that?? I sure as hell don't!!
The government can't even pass a bill without it leaking out.
@ps2nolimits Really? Kevin Cosgrove, who was killed, was recorded in the South tower on the 105th floor for almost 5 minutes prior to the collapse. The EMT dispatch recorded Kevin along with a few of his co workers in the room. When i video taped a controlled demo my audio needles overpeaked from 2 blocks away. Kevin continued talking unimpeded by any such noise (or even REACTION to noise) right to the point of collapse.
It is a theory so ridiculous it borders on Moronic!!
Hmm, can I have a link to this video? And explain how they managd to obtain the video after it collapsed with the building. Strangely unharmed in the rubble like that hijackers passport was?
@ps2nolimits Link? to the Kevin Cosgrove video? just type that in on the search bar. And how do they video after it collapses? He is on a cell phone or office phone talking to EMT. His audio and an external video (obviously shot concurrently) are put together following a basic time line of events. Just the towers smoking away as he speaks. Right at the end the South Tower collapses and you hear the rumble for a second or two and him screaming.. "Oh GOD Ooooooooooooohhhh!!!
2. If it isn't fake: You can hear a slight boom noise, but obviously it isn't that loud as you mentioned. But think about it, if he's on the 105th floor, he is pretty close to the top of the building. There are at least 20+ concrete floors between him and where the plane hit. If the building was brought down by a controlled demolition, the bombs would have been set off... (see next post)
...from the point where the plane hit to much lower on the building. So the noise of some bombs 20+ (probably 30+) CONCRETE floors beneath him most likely would not be that loud. Sound simply can't travel through that many layers without a serious lessening of the actual loudness.
@ps2nolimits BULLSHIT!!!!!! I was TWO BLOCKS away from a controlled demolition and the concussion from the charges shook my feet. The audio overpeaked on my sound meter. Like fella!! there is NO FUCKING WAY you would NOT HEAR those charges and there would be such a volley of them for a building that size... NO WAY!!! NOT EVEN CLOSE!! You are surmising. I KNOW what I am talking about!!
Faked phone call??????. For what?? An EMT is going to sit and talk to a guy for 5 mins and he dies??
@roquefortfiles where there 20-40 floors of concrete in between you and the explosion? I would assume no. And who said anything about not hearing anything? You CAN hear an explosion like sound before he screams "oh god" or whatever, it's just not that loud at all though (probably due to my given reason).
Just forget about the faked phone call for now. I'm leaving it open as a possibility to myself, but there is no use arguing about that because neither of us could prove it either way at all.
@ps2nolimits Come on!! A phone call that picks up a few lightly talking people in a room and shaped cut charges (supposedly) go off 180 feet below them? Charges that would sound like.. BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG!!! (and i might point out WOULD HAVE TO to bring that building down.. the rules do not suddenly change). Every camera running that day, and there were many, would have INCONTROVERTIBLE proof. One camera was DIRECTLY below the tower..
1. Stop ignoring that many layers of concrete floors in between the guy and the explosions.
2. The camera directly below the tower (I would like a link to this for confirmation that it is actually DIRECTLY under the tower and not a little ways away from it) is probably the only one where you'd be able to actually hear the explosions clearly. But the gov't could have Easily edited out those sounds.
3. Forget all this, just look at the way they fall!
WTC 2 collapse from the south, street level ABC news
What i think ANYONE would agree is virtually underneath the towers (within reason!!). Listen closely!!! NOT A SOUND!! NO DETONATIONS!! NOTHING!! NOT ONE BANG. The whole thing simply fails and collapses!!
EXACTLY as the audio on Kevin Cosgrove's video. And this can be corroborated from MANY other cameras.
Linear shape charges????? AS FUCKING IF!!! NO BLOODY WAY!!! NO WAY!!!! NO WAY NO HOW
@ps2nolimits I think things the firemen are saying are being USED to further this nonsense. If you bother to REALLY listen they describe as being "LIKE" a controlled demo. As for alleged "charges" going off.. NO they are not. What you see there is nothing but the upper floors compressing air in the building and it is being EJECTED out the sides. (this is expected!!) it is also noted by trained Engineers.
As for David R G. This guy is a tool with an agenda!! He spouts much nonsense!
@ps2nolimits Controlled demo thing is such crap. I will tell you why.
The prep time is an ABSURD assertion. Even demolition companies say so. It is not REMOTELY plausible. Secondary explosions? Of course there were!! its a huge fire (propane tanks??etc) But a CD has charges that go.. BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG.... IT NEVER OCCURRED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AS IN NEVVVVVVVVVVVVER!! and it would HAVE TO!!! CD have wiring and blasting caps all over afterward. NOT ONE WAS FOUND!!
@roquefortfiles Oh, yeah...prep time...as if "they" (the zionist motherfuckers loyal ONLY to israel) just threw the plan together at the last minute! LOL!
Dude, there were numerous power downs in the weeks and months prior to 911, mysterious workers (ostensibly) upgrading internet cables/doing elevator repairs, evidence of drilling into concrete, etc., so the prep wasn't done the day before!
You DO know who the head of Securacom was, don't you? Marvin Bush and cousin Wirt! RE: Bertha Champagne
@Bongofury361 You do know that both towers collapsed at exactly the points they were hit right? So, it is just SO BELIEVABLE that all this crap stays securely in place to function when its needed as the entire floor is obliterated. Not only that. But both collapses happen from SILENCE. Controlled Demolition Linear shaped charges would shatter your ear drums from the distance some news guys were shooting.
It is all a bunch of complete nonsense!!! Get real!!
@blite13 Well Mr Sock Puppet, Anyone who knows anything about aircraft can instantly tell there is a commercial jet at the Pentagon. There is EASILY identifiable wreckage there... IF.. you know what you are looking at. And most idiots don't!! So they scream MISSILE!!!. The very presence of BOEING GREEN!! (which is everywhere!! and I will bet you don't have a clue what I am talking about and I am not surprised!!).. is more than enough ALONE!! Oh.. and btw an EMT found the data recorder
This video possibly best demonstrates what EVERYONE would be hearing prior to the collapse.. HAD IT BEEN A CONTROLLED DEMO!! This is a far smaller building but just have a listen to this cacophony of sound!! There is NO WAY anyone is going to mistake this. And this would HAVE to take place.
You would not be having the tower standing in relative silence as it was then out of nowhere just collapse if explosives were used. NO WAY!!!
did he just say that he's absolutely positive they couldn't do it? THEY FUCKING DID DO IT. Go watch the plane bank hard right into the building you stupid shit. And for the record, if a person has the capability of building a plane, i think a towel head is capable of learning how to fly the stupid thing.
@zenoist2 That is a bunch of BS. I asked a friend of mine who flies a 757 and 747 (30 years experience) that question. He said altitude has nothing to do with the engine performance they are capable of full power, full speed at 2 feet off the ground.
I don't know what is so hard to understand about this day. Its fairly straightforward. And all laid out for you in audio from the planes and video from 40 different angles.
@zenoist2 That is a bunch of Youtube nonsense!! I asked a friend of mine who flies a 757 this question and this is what he said. "No.. not at all.. the altitude has nothing to do with the engines performance, it has no bearing what so ever on the engines. I can fly the plane at full speed at 10 feet if i wanted to". And he is a captain on a 757 and was on a 747 also with a military trained background.
Holes in the story? More like too much BS on line!!!
@zenoist2 ..... the pilot's opinion is certainly valid and reliable. However, if it could go to prove something, that would be that the planes were either flown by highly experience
This has been flagged as spam show
One thing this pilot is not considering is if they lined up from further away at a slower speed like 400-450 MPH then full throttled the engines for the last mile or so what ever would be needed to bring up to speed (and you can hear the engines roaring full throttle on the 2nd plane that hits the south tower on multiple videos) Come on people think!! Nobody said the were making those turns and flew the planes at 550 MPH the entire trip. Even I know how to throttle up one of those planes!
bubbasteve8 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
paranoid idiots. people who actually want to think rationally about these consp theories should go to ItWasTyped. com .. the FACTS on conspiracy theories
culturebully3 2 months ago
The Pentagon wasnt hit by a 757. The second tower was hit by a military plane. Leaders of this country are fucking retards for trying to hide what really is going on. Bin Laden was obviously someone to blame for our governments stupid actions.
DetroitGreasy 3 months ago
this pilot has my vote strange alien terroist r among us .....^^
char121214 4 months ago
I totally believe this Pilot. I do think the terrorists were on the planes (some of them- obviously not the ones that are turning up alive) & once at a certain point the planes were guided by remote.(from people on the ground/ in d.c./ where-ever.) Remote/radio control (invented by Nikola Tesla) is very common w/planes these days. Landing a jumbo jet is now 3 buttons w/computer assist (from the ground).Test footage of plane crashes/cabin burning cameras w/dummies inside are done w/r.control.
Echdrum 4 months ago
I totally believe this Pilot. I do think the 'terrorists' were on the planes (some of them- obviously not the ones that are turning up alive) & once at a certain point the planes were guided by remote.(from people on the ground/ in d.c./ where-ever.) Remote/radio control (invented by Nikola Tesla) is very common w/planes these days. Landing a jumbo jet is now 3 buttons w/computer assist (from the ground).Test footage of plane crashes/cabin burning cameras w/dummies inside are done w/r.control.
Echdrum 4 months ago
Then who flew the planes? You could not pay someone to do it, they'd be dead.
tybrady64 4 months ago
The whole damn thing is one big set up from beggining to end. Are there people in this country still that dellusional and utterly nieve to believe the governments fairy tale for this evil satanic con job?
Allanlegacy43 4 months ago 2
Nah, it was those towelhead muslim bastards.
9pt9 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (Donated) For Debates And Governance
Topics: THE WEAPON THAT CAN BREAK THE CYCLE OF WAR AND TERRORISM, Debated Issues, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
balanceddiet.yolasite.com
balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
SPREAD THIS BOOK AND CONQUER THE SPREADING EVIL BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE - FOR FREEDOM AND PEACE.
TheServiceWeb 4 months ago
9/11 is not an inside job. The sooner you accept that, the better.
Mike40135 4 months ago
Sooo this guy can land an aircraft but can't hit the pentagon? oooook
AnAscendingAngel 4 months ago
@AnAscendingAngel you cant land an aircraft going 500 mph, and what he is saying is you cant make a quick descend into the building going 500 mph, which is beyond the capable speed these commercial air craft can go
RVCAXD 4 months ago
Pentagon hit by missile! WTC 1 and 2 hit by military craft fitted with incendiary devices on the bottom flown by RC! (flight 93) never crashed, it was diverted to and landed at an airforce base. WTC 7 hit by Nothing!
galaxything 4 months ago
Comment removed
galaxything 4 months ago
Some of you need to look at some of the videos and 'notice' the planes, they look like military planes from the bottom, check it out. We've been screwed over my friends and I was one who it took 10 years to believe this.
ebertmadwoman 4 months ago
/watch?v=pDz6sEdrcfM
If an Airbus at take-off speed can perform like this, why couldn';t the planes on Sept 11th?!
The pilot being interviewed had years of flight and navigation training and was taught not to stress the aircraft.
The terrorists didn't care.
They didn't need to land, they didn't care about stressing the aircraft, and the buildings they hit were easily identifiable objects visible from many miles away and only needed basic navigation to get to the area and target visually.
Cliffjumper24 4 months ago
@Cliffjumper24 /wiki/Airbus_A320_family third way down page """"operated with an Airbus A319-132 EI-EDM landed short of the runway and broke an undercarriage when the aircraft attempted landing at Palermo Airport, Italy."""" airplanes fall apart at the littlest of things and you think they can cut through steel building like butter, and hit the pentagon after sliding on the floor.
google bird damage to planes, and see what those feathery little soft objects can do to a plane.
Anonymous124578 4 months ago
@Anonymous124578 EI-EDM landed on a rough surface and the undercarrage broke.....
I raise you "4 October 1992, Amsterdam. El Al Flight 1862 crashed into a building at low speed.
Or the concorde crash that hit a building as it came down.
Or even easier.... try the 2006 New York City plane crash, a little plane that entered a highride apartment block.
If a light plane can puncture a steel building (although not reinforced like the Pentagon), a larger plane at high speed can do more damage.
Cliffjumper24 4 months ago
As for Birdstrikes, they rarely do any serious damage.
Unless they hit windshields (which can blind pilots), or hit the radome (a fibreglass panel covering the radar), or worst of all, get ingested by the engines (such as caused the NYC Hudson river crash landing), birds do little more than leave a dent in an aircraft.
Cliffjumper24 4 months ago
FUCK YOU. The fucking terrorists that flew those planes, learned how to fly at Briscoe Field; the airport for Gwinnett County in Georgia. I live 10 min away from there. I take lessons there. I've met the guy who taught those terrorists how to fly. He said he was great pilot and all you really need is to be good at flying a cessna to fly a 767/757, not like a pro but just enough to where you can bank and keep it level.
cds587 5 months ago
@cds587 To bad our government ordered 9/11.
Snappedsoul 4 months ago
@Snappedsoul Dude where is the fucking proof?!?!?! 9/11 can never and will never be debunked.
cds587 4 months ago
ah yeh, thousands of cameras directed to the manhattan skyline, even the government back then wouldnt be so stupid to fire a missile and then rely on the FBI collecting all videos , jesus christ, you guys crack me up
lemplem1 5 months ago
this kinda stuff cant be debunked...how much proof do the ignorant need ffs ?
Emin7 5 months ago
Ur old u fought in in wwII no planes could fly that fast back then this is the modern world
jonathanrobles22 5 months ago
inside job
galaxian77 6 months ago
The WTC is like the Loch Ness Monster they never existed. Its just a tourist attraction.
TheCentralServices 6 months ago
rumsfield reports 2.3 trillion dollars the pentagon cant account for on sept 10th, 2001. the next day guess what makes headlines. y9dnkbe is right. the missile took out the accounting dept and files of where our 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS of our tax payers money went., don't believe me? its on a lot of sites, google it. cbs even comes up
TheUshijinx 6 months ago 3
@TheUshijinx ~ Rummsfeld also said that in interviews on Jan 12, 2001, April 7, 2001, May 23 2oo1, and August 15, 2001
LOLCATS3111 3 months ago
Troofers, being morons claim that pilots are on their side for 9-11 truth, despite pilots offering a reward for the capture of OBL.
dreadnaught2 7 months ago
@dreadnaught
the only morons i see are insulting people for asking questions about this whole story..
yes i believe the official version but im not gonna come on youtube and act like a childish cunt to other people
lonewolf2379 6 months ago
@dreadnaught2 You moron yourself.
Misstorys 6 months ago
What is still up with Ameriduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh!!!! 10 yrs and still denial, you cannot debunk reality, not even in Ameriduh! 767 PILOT says no, sheeple with no clue say yes, pilot gets my vote, the one on here who actually knows what the fuck he is talking about.TtWwAaTtSs!!
Sept11IsALie 7 months ago 13
@Sept11IsALie
the terrorists had maps and a compass.
xNAJAFx 5 months ago
@Sept11IsALie: Exactly! I am American, and I couldn't agree more.
erpuzzetta01 5 months ago
@Sept11IsALie right, so let me get this straight this licensed trained pilot says no way, so do you think he can do it? interesting he didnt bring up the fact that the hijackers were trained pilots in 767 simulators and logged over 500 hrs of flight in 2000. so believe the licensed pilot or believe the hijacked licensed pilot? and were the sheep?
BoardFlipper5150 4 months ago
@Sept11IsALie Yeah, it's pretty discouraging that these "debunkers' still believe the official fairytale, despite the preponderance of evidence to the contrary. Even the speed of the 2nd "plane" is up for debate, as none of the official bodies who weighed in on the question, could agree on one speed! MIT, FBI, NIST, FAA, NTSB, etc.--none could agree on one speed!
Hell, they can't even agree on whether the plane was flying level, or dive bombing--and the fake pictures reflect that! FKN BULLSHIT!
Bongofury361 4 months ago 2
what more evidence do u dumb fucks need it was an inside job!!! u dumbass's people are being brainwashed by our stupid government! people are just afraid of the turth!
B0rn2ball111 7 months ago
All of the 9-11 pilots had valid FAA commercial licensence's and could have been hired by any carrier as a pilot. Flight 77 was witnessed crashing by hundreds and the supposed 'impossible' flight maneuvers are established from the recovered flight recorder, found at the pentagon. Truthers are morons...uninformed morons
dreadnaught2 7 months ago
@dreadnaught2 still feeding bullshit like Ameri-cunt cakes i see!!!
Sept11IsALie 7 months ago
The alleged hijackers flying the plane like this is the equivalent of me getting my learner's permit in a Honda with automatic transmission, and then the next day winning the Daytona 500. But hey, I guess this pilot is just a "kook" who "hates Amurika" and "wants to hug a terrorist".
peterp21 7 months ago
He was probably blonde
zPeeNuT 7 months ago
Play 'Flight Simulation' long enough, you'll know how to fly
debunkerman 7 months ago
What bullshit. Class? Vertical navigate? Those aren't terms pilots use to describe their birds.
scaremenga 8 months ago
@scaremenga sock puppet
blite13 7 months ago
Well, I don't think flying a jumbo jet can be so hard, especially if you have its pilot at gun point for any advice! Anyone ever tried to fly a jumbo on FSX? Trust me, if you like jets, or you think allah will like you more if you fly them, it's easy. It WOULD be difficult to land it, but that was not necessary after all...
LastBornProductions 8 months ago
@LastBornProductions
oh yea.. right.. so The US Military just let... you know.. a few jet liners fly around the capitol for almost an hour without being intercepted at all.. .. yeah right.
I feel sorry for the brain washed thick heads - some will never wake up.
merkabah2 8 months ago
@merkabah2 This is a different conversation. I was only replying on the "is a jumbo jet easy to fly" thing. On the thick head case, I believe we all are kinda thick heads on 9/11 and other similar events because we will NEVER know EXACTLY what hapenned... Hell, we are not even sure about the circumstances surrounding Bin Laden's death... 2011? 2002? When did the man die? So we can only speculate.. :)
LastBornProductions 8 months ago
@LastBornProductions
heh..
merkabah2 8 months ago
@LastBornProductions = sockpuppet
blite13 7 months ago
@blite13 = immature and uneducated
LastBornProductions 7 months ago
Get ready for the new false flag coming soon from the united states of america. Pakistan watch out because america want something. America fuck me your sick.
theftrecordings 8 months ago
I saw someone land a plane in about 20 feet of space (viral video actually). These guys spent their life preparing. I know 14 year olds who can pull that off from years of Flight Simulator/video games.
From what I understand, that is what these guys did too.
brendanmcwilliams 9 months ago
@brendanmcwilliams
if you really think a 14 year old with a couple years of flight sim could pull of those maneuvers you need a psych analysis.
danny31235 8 months ago
@brendanmcwilliams rofl you're obv a dumb troll
kurij187 8 months ago
@brendanmcwilliams BAINWASHED VICTIM NUMBER 89938337488441
theftrecordings 8 months ago
@brendanmcwilliams you are retarded, clearly you have never flown a plane before.
boostedeghatch 8 months ago
@brendanmcwilliams = sock puppet
blite13 7 months ago
How many times a day do people fly planes into buildings... But everybody seems to know exactly what should and shouldn't occur when somebody they don't know does.
Bruinsrule100 9 months ago
@Bruinsrule100 Next time you watch this video.. pay attention.
TwiztedAnimator 9 months ago
@Bruinsrule100 Real question is.. How many times a day do ppl get billion dollar insurances for their buildings a week or 2 before they are hit with a plane? how many times a day do they change highjacking rules to where someon like bush has to make the call to shoot it down instead of the military? and why would they let a plane with 100 ppl fly into buildings with 10's of thousands of ppl? Its pretty obvious bush did it or you guys are by far the dumbest fkn ppl on earth to let that happen
kurij187 8 months ago
Here here. Exactly what i been trying to tell people but they dont listen. Amature pilots with very little training could not have flown them planes that good.
gentjt38 10 months ago
so true
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@gentjt38 the other day i thought and said to my friend. 'do you really think some terrorists could have hijacked a plane and been able to drive it so accurately into the towers?' we thought NO. this is funny and america is a sick sick country.
theftrecordings 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The WTC complex was an enormous architectural white elephant filled with asbestos that needed removal and with far too few tenants. The WTC had been built too large & strong, the cost of deconstruction, an estimated 15 billion, far outweighed whatever profit an owner might gain from years of ownership. But a buyer did step forward. Larry Silverstein, and purchased the property, maybe with the foresight the towers would be a good target for a false flay operation - Like the USS LIBERTY
MsNoKOOLaid 10 months ago
oh i thought he meant he drove both planes on the same day, i was gonna say... SAY WHAT?!?!
djphlange 11 months ago
they didnt train on a cessna. they trained using flight simulators. literally look it up.
burningsponge 11 months ago
Russ = truther
Truther= moron
Go figure
Gi0Piles 1 year ago
I know how to fly a cessna but i wouldn't DREAM to even try to fly one of the big ones.
alexicon89 1 year ago
they either made the pilot re-direct the plane or they got the plane's computer to do it.
once they were heading in the right direction, any moron can fly a plne like that - try flight simulator
wastedwasted3 1 year ago
@wastedwasted3 -- NO, you don't understand the flight characteristics involved. 500 knots is like 150 knots OVER the design specs, the wings would fail. The 5 or 6-G banking turns are virtually impossible to execute. Those are SOME of the reasons most commercial pilots cannot accept the official narrative as given. The more one looks at the improbabilities, inconsistencies, quirks, impossibilities & unanswered qustions, the more one is forced to conclude the 911 official explanation is BULLSHIT.
starmanskye 1 year ago
You say most commercial pilots cannot accept the official narrative. Could you provide a reliable respected source please.
Thank you Sir.
beorhav 11 months ago
@wastedwasted3 people like you always try to find some BS "rational" explaination for the unexplainable. you have no way of knowing what the truth is yet you've actually convinced yourself that your OPINION is an absolute fact. lmfao. those idiots could not have possibly set those plane to auto pilot. you, me nor any untrained person could never fly a plane that accurately even if auto-pilot was engaged and especially at those speeds. please go buy yourself a clue.
jww312 1 year ago
@jww312 they trained at flight school dick and had aircraft manuals. anyway we both agree we have no knowledge of how to pilot an aircraft - i was throwing some bait out to either be confirmed or disconfirmed
wastedwasted3 1 year ago
@wastedwasted3 if it were that easy, why do they pay pilots big money? Why wouldn't they just hire some kid out of highschool at Min. wage who played simulator on his computer for a couple of years? stop being a sellout, you sockpuppet.
blite13 7 months ago
There are way too many parts of the entire 9/11 puzzle that just don't fit together.
marshmelloman1977 1 year ago
In anything as complicated as the physics of a plane crash there will inevitably be things that taken by themselves don't seem right.
I'm still waiting to find out how 'they' made silent explosives!!!
beorhav 11 months ago
Do people really think manipulating the controls of a jet requires skill??? When you're going to die anyway, a couple hours playing with flight simulator is all you need to prepare.
They weren't jet pilots, and they didn't have to be. In fact, they didn't have to know about a single system on those planes to simply steer them into the towers. Any student cessna pilot could pull it off.
JP84CE1 1 year ago
@JP84CE1 = another sock puppet, you know when the sock puppets are spamming a vid, that it is real and is the truth. You guys are making this vid a no brainer, this guy is telling the truth and you sockpuppets are paid to discredit it, you dummies. You are making what he says TRUE and obviously TRUE with your poor deflunking. How dumb can you be?
blite13 7 months ago
I never did believe that amature pilots did any of the flying that day.
gentjt38 1 year ago
Google Bertha Champagne and learn about her mysterious death, and the failure of the media to EVEN report it!
The Washington Post was the only newspaper to report it, and they waited almost a week to do so, and tried to bury the story on page 3 of the Metro section!
The Fairfax County, Virginia Police website didn't even mention Marvin Bush.
Bertha was the nanny to son Walker, and daughter Marshall...geez, if they'd had anymore kids, they probably would've named them Texas and Ranger!
Sheesh!
Bongofury361 1 year ago
@y9dnkbe It was a missile! If you look at the footage the FBI actually DID release...despite the numerous cameras on the Pentagon AND surrounding area (all video confiscated by the FBI)...you can see the telltale squiggle of a missile exhaust!
There is no freakin' way a 767 could crash into a building without scorching the ground (at least!), and without leaving any evidence of itself!
Just by coincidence, whatever punched that neat hole through several walls, took out the accounting dept.,
Bongofury361 1 year ago 17
@Bongofury361 Really? Maybe you should let the C 130 pilot who was asked by air traffic control to look out for the plane (which he did). Then followed it as it banked and dove straight in to the Pentagon. And he reported it LIVE as it happened.
And its on Youtube!!
You might want to let him know that it was a missile.. Like HOLY SHIT. Who'd a thunk it??? Wow your amazing!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles
where is this video?
sumitino 1 year ago
@sumitino Look it up!!! Its on here!! Type in C 130 9/11
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@Bongofury361 A missile wouldn't have waited until it was inside the structure before exploding.
The plane impact was hundreds of feet in the air; not sure what you mean by "scorching the ground".
There was evidence. Plane parts landed throughout the surrounding city. No, they were not delivered by van.
Like hell you know where the accounting department was.
lingojac 7 months ago
@Bongofury361 @Bongofury361 A missile wouldn't have waited until it was inside the structure before exploding.
The plane impact was hundreds of feet in the air; not sure what you mean by "scorching the ground".
There was evidence. Plane parts landed throughout the surrounding city. No, they were not delivered by van.
Like hell you know where the accounting department was.
lingojac 7 months ago
@lingojac Wow, I know you debunkers are mentally challenged, but you are the FIRST person to suggest the impact was hundreds of feet in the air! What was hundreds of feet in the air...the pentagon?
You are talking about the pentagon, right?
Are you saying that missiles can't be programmed to explode later?
As for knowing it was the accounting department, it's called RESEARCH!
Bongofury361 7 months ago
@Bongofury361 The WTC towers were around 1300 feet at their roofs, I don't think my estimation was that far off. But I guess some of us are pickier than others.
Yes, I'm sure missiles can be "programmed to explode later". That ability doesn't count as evidence, genius.
I don't care where the accounting department was, I was being sarcastic and disregarding that point of yours as irrelevant, because it is.
You don't know anything about structures and are resorting to missile theories. Idiot.
lingojac 7 months ago
@lingojac How could the accounting dept be irrelevant? Rumsfeld said the day before 9/11 that 2.3 TRILLION was missing from the pentagon and that spot that was hit on 9/11 was where they were doing the accounting discovery to find out where that money went. Out of all the places the 'plane' could have hit the pentagon, it picks that spot? WOW, what another coincidence, huh? And you say it is irrelevant, I think your deflunking is irrelevant. Ya sockpuppet.
blite13 7 months ago
@lingojac Oh, you're talking about Flight 93 that allegedly crashed in Shanksville...but the impact was with the ground (that's the official story), not up in the air! Man, you are confused!
Bongofury361 7 months ago
@Bongofury361 No, that's not what I was talking about, hence me not mentioning it ;)
lingojac 7 months ago
@Bongofury361 YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT! SHUT THE FUCK UP! IT WASNT A MISSLE YOU RETARD IT WAS A FUCKING PLANE! GROW THE FUCK UP AND REALIZE THAT 2000 PEOPLE DIED IN ONE MORNING. NO SHIT IT DESTROYED AN ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT, THE WHOLE FUCKING BUILDING COLLAPSED ALONG WITH 2000 LIVES! AND NO EVIDENCE? WE HAVE 2000 AMERICANS DEAD AND 4 HOLES IN THE GROUND! OUR GOVENMENT SHOULD KILL YOU AND EVERY OTHER RETARD INBRED INSECT LIKE YOU! YOUR JUST AS GOOD AS OSAMA BIN LADEN WHO CLAIMED RESPONSIBILITY!
videocritic8888 5 months ago
@videocritic8888 Wow! First-of-all, you need to get your doc to up the strength of your meds, as they are obviously not working anymore! Secondly, you need to get your facts straight, as the official total of dead was closer to 3,000! Thirdly, the pentagon did NOT collapse completely, but the accounting dept. was taken out, destroying the evidence of the $2.3 trillion that went missing!
OBL never claimed responsibility for 911, only CIA faked videos did!
BTW, your gov't is run by zionist jews!
Bongofury361 5 months ago
@Bongofury361 "OBL never claimed responsibility for 911, only CIA faked videos did!" if theyre fake then you have no proof of this.
BTW your a retard
videocritic8888 5 months ago
@Bongofury361 funny because the thing is over 95% of the plane parts were found in the pentagon. Grow up
GoPensGo377 4 months ago
@GoPensGo377 except they weren't
THENINTENDOLUMINARY 4 months ago
@GoPensGo377 Hey, what debunker did you parrot that bullshit statistic from? Since when is aluminum able to penetrate through several rings of steel re-enforced concrete, hmm? You're aware that planes are primarily aluminum, right? MAYBE NOT!
Tell you what...how about YOU grow a fucking brain, you dumb fucker!
It's assholes like you that are complicit in the Crime of The 21st century, because of your sheer stupidity!
Only an idiot in serious denial would believe the official fairytale!
WAKE UP!
Bongofury361 4 months ago
@Bongofury361 Ok how about you go up to the families of the people that passed during this tragedy and tell them your theorys. Have fun.
GoPensGo377 4 months ago
@GoPensGo377 I'm sure the families are well aware of alternative theories, and don't have a problem with them. What does alternative theories have to do with the victims? NOTHING!
I'm sure they would want the REAL PERPETRATORS to be brought to justice, instead of the situation you have now---where NOBODY has been brought to justice--except Moussaoui--who was just a plant to corroborate the official fairytale!
Only you brain dead debunkers can compare apples to oranges--and come up with lemons!
Bongofury361 4 months ago
@Bongofury361 please tell me your thoery?, apples to oranges and get lemons? seems the only people who cant agree on anything are the theorists, theorists are denying reports of other theorists beliefs, you could compare apples to oranges and get your elbow in your ass
BoardFlipper5150 4 months ago
@BoardFlipper5150 I believe drones or remote controlled military jets were used--disguised, of course--to strike the towers, hence the need for video fakery to cover that up.
Just because those who seek the truth have varying theories, it does not change the fact that the official fairytale is IMPOSSIBLE!
Since you (and all your other "debunker" friends) have intellectually lobotomized yourselves, why not ram 8 inch replicas of the towers up your noses, and do it right?
Coherency is important!
Bongofury361 4 months ago
@Bongofury361 I never said it was impossible, i said not 1 theorist can present a solid case, all i've seen from theorists its twisting official storys, and misquoting constantly, in fact bermas and avery both on TV quoted then showed the video to suppor t their claim and not once in the video did the quoter ever say what avery quoted. You need facts, you need evidence and so far no theorists have come forward with any except misquotes and blasting expert testamony.
BoardFlipper5150 4 months ago
@Bongofury361 what video fakery? In order to use drones or military jets the cover up would go deeper, airports, citizens, customers who flew on that plane earlier in the day, bottom line how is the official fairytale impossible when credible experts support it, 800 (global)experts that dont believe is is less than 1% of the 1.2 million in the US alone not to mention international.NIST not a government supported company but contracted by the government no more than you or I could hire them for
BoardFlipper5150 4 months ago
@Bongofury361 do you know how far the cover up would have to go to use that? secret doesnt mean bringing airports and citizens into the cover up. I dont see how its impossible when multiple experts have supported the conclusion of NIST, which is not government operated but was contracted by gov't no more than you or I could hire them if we had the money. what TV fakery was there? cause im pretty sure i watched a 767 fly into a building, you say theres missle exhaust yet dont believe it could
BoardFlipper5150 4 months ago
@BoardFlipper5150 exhaust from anything else, like a plane maybe? or the 136 witnesses that saw the plane fly into the pentagon, citizens stuck in traffic lying? what citizen could live with the biggest event in US history knowing its a lie and his fellow citizens would not be brought justice, all for a tax break or a pay off? which makes the citizens who your tryin to bring to justice no different than the gov't, the truth is you have no facts or evidence to support your claims, we do
BoardFlipper5150 4 months ago
@BoardFlipper5150 Yeah, I've heard this argument many times...that the amount of people involved in a cover-up would number in the thousands, and would be impossible to keep secret, but...the Manhattan Project involved thousands and they kept that secret!
I think it would be pretty easy to keep people quiet if gov't types let it be known they know where you live, who your family is, etc.
Who were these experts that supported NISTs findings...Popular Mechanics? Don't make me laugh!
Bongofury361 4 months ago
@BoardFlipper5150 "which is not government operated but was contracted by gov't no more than you or I could hire them if we had the money." What-the-hell were you saying here, as I can't make heads or tails of this statement?!
The NIST report is so severely flawed, it isn't worth the paper it was written on!
What is this conclusion you refer to? There was NO conclusion, as they didn't finish the job--their "investigation" only goes to the point of collapse, and that's it!
You saw the plane?
Bongofury361 4 months ago
@BoardFlipper5150 Dude...do some REAL investigation...don't pull a NIST, a FEMA, or a 911 commission by ignoring the evidence!
Just ask yourself: why was there so much resistance to an investigation by the white house? Why were all the official "investigations" so obviously flawed, to the point of being laughable? Why did it take NIST so many years to complete their fiction, but they only allowed for 3 weeks of review? Why did NIST refuse to meet Dr. with Stephen Jones to address problems?
Bongofury361 4 months ago
@Bongofury361 real investigation? there was no resistance into the investigation, NIST signed the contract less than a year after the attacks to investigate. NIST doesnt need to meet with mr. jones, why would they? Jones tests on aluminum were conducted at 800 degrees which aluminum does melt at a silver color, BUT in 1200 degrees aluminum melts to a yellow/red/orange. have a look for yourself drjudywooddotcom/articles/aluminum/Aluminum_Glows.html
BoardFlipper5150 4 months ago
@BoardFlipper5150 so ah there's my real investigation, your supporting someone that retracted his statement and said the molten metal could be aluminum, "Steven Jones identified this material as looking "silvery," implying that he, too, thought it could be aluminum.(mp3) However, the point is that no one is really sure. Can you tell by looking at it what metal it is, especially if you don't know the temperature of it? What has slopped over onto the sides and cooled does indeed look "silvery."
BoardFlipper5150 4 months ago
@GoPensGo377 Yeah, and according to you "debunkers", 95% of the "plane" alleged to have crashed in Shanksville was recovered! Gee, what a coincidence!
As far as growing up goes...you need to grow a brain and accept the fact that your gov't doesn't give a shit about it's people, especially as it has been hijacked by zionist jews who only care about israel!
All you fucking ostriches need to open your eyes, ears and minds to the preponderance of evidence that 911 was an israeli/mossad inside job!!!
Bongofury361 4 months ago 2
where it was just announced the day before (by Rumsfeld)...that they could NOT account for 2.3 trillion....that's TRILLION...in military spending!
Wasn't 911 wonderful timing...to make people forget about little issues like...2.3 TRILLION!?
Bongofury361 1 year ago
so...if veteran pilots couldn't do it, then who did do it?
y9dnkbe 1 year ago
It's disconcerting to see an airline pilot with no common sense. If the planes can't fly these so called impossible g turns he talks about then no one could fly them. They obvious did fly and didn't break up and were crashed into the building which means the g forces were not excessive. QED. Talking about 'vertical and lateral navigating' the plane (moving the wheel back forward, left or right ) as if this was some kind of high art is nonsense, doubly so coming from someone with his experience.
cwlldoran 1 year ago
@cwlldoran I am not a pilot so do not claim expertise here. But a friend of mine took off, flew and landed a 737 (in a simulator mind you) with ZERO training!! Some crazed terrorist is not exactly worried about the airplanes "envelope". They are hell bent on hitting the target (which 40 videos clearly show). With GPS co ords put in to the computer how hard is it to punch the throttles to full power pick a line on VFR and its.. WTC dead ahead!! It CAN be done and was!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
You cannot debunk undebukable evidence , 911 is A Lie
Sept11IsALie 1 year ago 13
Read Karl Popper
beorhav 11 months ago
@Sept11IsALie uhh how :/????
angelsoffurtitude 11 months ago
@Sept11IsALie Look up the NIST World Trade Center report.
I honestly, sincerely want to see you debunk that.
lingojac 7 months ago
@lingojac are you seriously fucking kidding me, ha, the NIST report is bullshit, no matter how many times you read it it will always be total utter bollocks, NIST= "Nothing Inside Spreads Truth" Listen to The PILOT who knows alot more than you about flying, get your head out your ass and wipe that shit out your eyes then you will see what we do, give your mouth a wipe aswell cause by fuck you talk shit, debunk that!
Sept11IsALie 7 months ago
@Sept11IsALie Less curse-ey, more debunk-ey
lingojac 7 months ago
N ine
E leven
W as
S taged
sb9889 1 year ago
he was paid to say this end of..
jamie211983 1 year ago
40 videos prove what? That planes hit the towers. We have no proof terrorists were on board unless you count Atta's miraculous passport found on the street near WTC. They used fucking drones and landed the people in Cleveland. Read about the social security index and the oddities of the passengers on those planes and have of those passengers were gov. employees or had affiliations. Check out the Mark Bingham bullshit story. "Hi Mom, This is Mark Bingham" lol
DrugstoreCFH 1 year ago
@DrugstoreCFH Oh really!! perhaps you might want to call up Lisa Frost's parents and tell them that. knowing she is safe and sound instead of being scraped up in bits from the WTC (which she was!!) is such a better ending than what happened. Oh.. and the terrorists were confirmed by the stewardesses on the planes..
You been sniffing too much glue dude!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
While i respect this fellows opinions there are 50 videos that say he is wrong. And as far as flying goes the terrorists were trained on commercial jets and all passed. A friend of mine with ZERO pilot training was able to take off and land a 737 in a simulator. Whats the big deal about aiming the plane at the target and punching the throttles to full power? If you got GPS co ords (which I am sure they did) its POSSIBLE. And 40 videos prove it.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles and 40 videos prove it? They prove that a plane (at least one) hit the WTC. They did not prove who drove them. In fact nothing proves who flewthem, except for the unharmed passport of one of the "terrorists" found in the reckage. As far as I'm concerned after about 20 hours of watching various videos over the last few days, 9/11 was an inside job and us trained pilots could well have flown the planes.
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits Well considering the hijackers were confirmed in their seat numbers by Stewardesses on board thru airfones (Betty Ong?) and Dave Bottiglia (air traffic controller) had on board transmissions from an Arabic guy in Capts seat several times. And Logan airport confirmed they boarded. Not sure why that is such a toughie for you. When you get cross referenced confirmations i think we are getting in to "unreasonable" arguments.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits Inside job hm? Well. How would explain the following. I recently watched a very good documentary on the CBC of a guy who is now a cab driver in Yemen. Hard core Islamist, used to be Bin Laden's body guard and an Alqaida member. All the traditional robes and sandals type. He said he personally knew all the hijackers and held many dinners for them prior to them leaving on their mission.
Now. I don't see George Bush and Dick Cheney calling this guy up to "help out" on 911.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles I've watched many good videos and documentaries on why 9/11 was not a "terrorist" attack as well....what makes "your" documentaries so truthful over the ones I've watched. It's more common sense than anything else anyways once you look at all the evidence. What are the odds some guy who happened to have dinner with all of the "hijackers" came forward and told CBS that he was bin laden's bodyguard and that he knew the "hijackers"...Frankly very slim...unless he was an actor
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits No no no no no!! The CBC does not work on BS documentaries for one. And they don't spend their time researching, traveling, and interviewing.. "ACTORS". Give me fucking break!! The CBC is one of the most HARDCORE doc producers!. All i can say is the overwhelming sense i got from it was.. "If this guy knows the hijackers how on EARTH can their be a conspiracy?" You are not going to have Islamic militants and the Bush government working together. Sorry that don't compute!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits Yes it is more common sense than anything!! The CBC are SCRUPULOUSLY picky about their documentaries. They do not produce "Puff" pieces. In fact much of their stuff leans toward being a little TOO bland at times. They showed him with Bin Laden!! He is an Alqaida member. Actor?? (come on!!).
So dismiss it all you want.. But think for JUST a second. Say the guy is the real deal. Kind of throws the whole conspiracy thing out the window!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles
It would definitely be somewhat of a "blow" to the people who believe that 9/11 was an inside job. But not completely in my mind. You ever know if these "Al-Qaeda" members were really working for some terrorist group or the US itself. Personally I have very little faith in the government to give us the whole truth on anything and I believe with all their power, they can easily manipulate the minds of the majority and pull off a fake terrorist attack.
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits I kind of side with Richard Clarke on this when he said. "The government is not that organized". One or two people conspiracy sure that's believable. But not when it involves HUNDREDS. You would have to have Air traffic control, air controllers on and on all in on it. That is not reasonable or believable in the slightest.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles Eh, I believe it can. I feel that if people are brainwashed enough/in fear of losing their job enough, masses of them will go along with corrupt ideas.
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits Whatever! You think that people like Ben Sliney (head of air traffic control) or Dave Bottiglia (Controller) don't understand when they are not talking to the pilot? Or an Arabic guy keying a mic and saying.. "Be quiet stay in your seats if you try to make any moves...". You think people like this are wrong or incorrect about doing their jobs?
I don't!!
And these people would HAVE to be in on it all. I think it is ridiculous personally.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles I'm just saying I don't view that as ridiculous. The gov't has as IMMENSE amount of power over the people living under it, by its rules. If 9/11 was an inside job, the head of air traffic control in my opinion would have to be in on it and I don't see what is so far fetched about it. There's more evidence that 9/11 was a controlled demolition and that the investigation was half-assed than that it was simply a terrorist attack.
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits I have video taped a controlled demolition for a television station (the entire process) Let me tell you from experience that there is NO WAY!! NO WAY!! that anyone could possibly confuse a controlled demolition for something else. The cut charges going off are INCREDIBLY loud. I am not talking a few bangs here boom there. I am talking about MASSIVELY loud bangs that shake you to the core!! My camera audio that day could not be confused. And none of that happened at WTC!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits Ben Sliney?? come on!! That would then mean Dave Bottiglia is in it. All the controllers are in on it. They all work in the same space. These people show up to work and go home to families with this big dark ugly secret of "Helping out" 9/11? Come on!! Rubbish!! You believe that?? I sure as hell don't!!
The government can't even pass a bill without it leaking out.
Controlled demolition? Explain.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles Controlled demolition? Just watch all the youtube videos about it. Some of them give great evidence.
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits Really? Kevin Cosgrove, who was killed, was recorded in the South tower on the 105th floor for almost 5 minutes prior to the collapse. The EMT dispatch recorded Kevin along with a few of his co workers in the room. When i video taped a controlled demo my audio needles overpeaked from 2 blocks away. Kevin continued talking unimpeded by any such noise (or even REACTION to noise) right to the point of collapse.
It is a theory so ridiculous it borders on Moronic!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
Comment removed
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@roquefortfiles
Hmm, can I have a link to this video? And explain how they managd to obtain the video after it collapsed with the building. Strangely unharmed in the rubble like that hijackers passport was?
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits Link? to the Kevin Cosgrove video? just type that in on the search bar. And how do they video after it collapses? He is on a cell phone or office phone talking to EMT. His audio and an external video (obviously shot concurrently) are put together following a basic time line of events. Just the towers smoking away as he speaks. Right at the end the South Tower collapses and you hear the rumble for a second or two and him screaming.. "Oh GOD Ooooooooooooohhhh!!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles
Here are two things to consider
1. It would be really easy to fake a phone call
2. If it isn't fake: You can hear a slight boom noise, but obviously it isn't that loud as you mentioned. But think about it, if he's on the 105th floor, he is pretty close to the top of the building. There are at least 20+ concrete floors between him and where the plane hit. If the building was brought down by a controlled demolition, the bombs would have been set off... (see next post)
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits
...from the point where the plane hit to much lower on the building. So the noise of some bombs 20+ (probably 30+) CONCRETE floors beneath him most likely would not be that loud. Sound simply can't travel through that many layers without a serious lessening of the actual loudness.
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits BULLSHIT!!!!!! I was TWO BLOCKS away from a controlled demolition and the concussion from the charges shook my feet. The audio overpeaked on my sound meter. Like fella!! there is NO FUCKING WAY you would NOT HEAR those charges and there would be such a volley of them for a building that size... NO WAY!!! NOT EVEN CLOSE!! You are surmising. I KNOW what I am talking about!!
Faked phone call??????. For what?? An EMT is going to sit and talk to a guy for 5 mins and he dies??
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles where there 20-40 floors of concrete in between you and the explosion? I would assume no. And who said anything about not hearing anything? You CAN hear an explosion like sound before he screams "oh god" or whatever, it's just not that loud at all though (probably due to my given reason).
Just forget about the faked phone call for now. I'm leaving it open as a possibility to myself, but there is no use arguing about that because neither of us could prove it either way at all.
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits Come on!! A phone call that picks up a few lightly talking people in a room and shaped cut charges (supposedly) go off 180 feet below them? Charges that would sound like.. BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG!!! (and i might point out WOULD HAVE TO to bring that building down.. the rules do not suddenly change). Every camera running that day, and there were many, would have INCONTROVERTIBLE proof. One camera was DIRECTLY below the tower..
NOTHING..of any significance was heard.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles Here are two points again:
1. Stop ignoring that many layers of concrete floors in between the guy and the explosions.
2. The camera directly below the tower (I would like a link to this for confirmation that it is actually DIRECTLY under the tower and not a little ways away from it) is probably the only one where you'd be able to actually hear the explosions clearly. But the gov't could have Easily edited out those sounds.
3. Forget all this, just look at the way they fall!
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits
Put this in to Youtube
WTC 2 collapse from the south, street level ABC news
What i think ANYONE would agree is virtually underneath the towers (within reason!!). Listen closely!!! NOT A SOUND!! NO DETONATIONS!! NOTHING!! NOT ONE BANG. The whole thing simply fails and collapses!!
EXACTLY as the audio on Kevin Cosgrove's video. And this can be corroborated from MANY other cameras.
Linear shape charges????? AS FUCKING IF!!! NO BLOODY WAY!!! NO WAY!!!! NO WAY NO HOW
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles just watch this and tell me what doesn't make sense about it
/watch?v=SXD3bAbZCow
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits I think things the firemen are saying are being USED to further this nonsense. If you bother to REALLY listen they describe as being "LIKE" a controlled demo. As for alleged "charges" going off.. NO they are not. What you see there is nothing but the upper floors compressing air in the building and it is being EJECTED out the sides. (this is expected!!) it is also noted by trained Engineers.
As for David R G. This guy is a tool with an agenda!! He spouts much nonsense!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits Controlled demo thing is such crap. I will tell you why.
The prep time is an ABSURD assertion. Even demolition companies say so. It is not REMOTELY plausible. Secondary explosions? Of course there were!! its a huge fire (propane tanks??etc) But a CD has charges that go.. BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG.... IT NEVER OCCURRED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AS IN NEVVVVVVVVVVVVER!! and it would HAVE TO!!! CD have wiring and blasting caps all over afterward. NOT ONE WAS FOUND!!
It is ridiculous!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles Oh, yeah...prep time...as if "they" (the zionist motherfuckers loyal ONLY to israel) just threw the plan together at the last minute! LOL!
Dude, there were numerous power downs in the weeks and months prior to 911, mysterious workers (ostensibly) upgrading internet cables/doing elevator repairs, evidence of drilling into concrete, etc., so the prep wasn't done the day before!
You DO know who the head of Securacom was, don't you? Marvin Bush and cousin Wirt! RE: Bertha Champagne
Bongofury361 1 year ago
@Bongofury361 You do know that both towers collapsed at exactly the points they were hit right? So, it is just SO BELIEVABLE that all this crap stays securely in place to function when its needed as the entire floor is obliterated. Not only that. But both collapses happen from SILENCE. Controlled Demolition Linear shaped charges would shatter your ear drums from the distance some news guys were shooting.
It is all a bunch of complete nonsense!!! Get real!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles and another one, this vid is so true and you sockpuppets prove it with your hounding of it.
blite13 7 months ago
@blite13 Well Mr Sock Puppet, Anyone who knows anything about aircraft can instantly tell there is a commercial jet at the Pentagon. There is EASILY identifiable wreckage there... IF.. you know what you are looking at. And most idiots don't!! So they scream MISSILE!!!. The very presence of BOEING GREEN!! (which is everywhere!! and I will bet you don't have a clue what I am talking about and I am not surprised!!).. is more than enough ALONE!! Oh.. and btw an EMT found the data recorder
roquefortfiles 7 months ago
@ps2nolimits
This video possibly best demonstrates what EVERYONE would be hearing prior to the collapse.. HAD IT BEEN A CONTROLLED DEMO!! This is a far smaller building but just have a listen to this cacophony of sound!! There is NO WAY anyone is going to mistake this. And this would HAVE to take place.
You would not be having the tower standing in relative silence as it was then out of nowhere just collapse if explosives were used. NO WAY!!!
Put this in to You tube
Landmark Implosion
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@ps2nolimits Did terrorists get their idea from watching a 1978 movie? Startlingly similar images!!
Copy paste below in.
The Medusa Touch - Part Eight (8) - Starring Richard Burton - 1978
Forward to the 3:18 minute mark!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles
heh
more likely we did actually (as in the us)
ps2nolimits 1 year ago
did he just say that he's absolutely positive they couldn't do it? THEY FUCKING DID DO IT. Go watch the plane bank hard right into the building you stupid shit. And for the record, if a person has the capability of building a plane, i think a towel head is capable of learning how to fly the stupid thing.
woodstockn084 1 year ago
its the airplanes manouvres that pilots find disconcerting.
I find the impossible speeds disconcerting too.
The engines cant physically push the air through at sea level for the quoted speeds because the air is a lot denser than at 30,000 ft altitude.
That is impossible.
The fact a crap pilot can fly it like an expert is merely almost impossible.
There are so many holes in any official 9/11 theory its untrue.
zenoist2 1 year ago
@zenoist2 "Engines can't push the air boss'
The Engines make more power at lower altitudes than they do at Higher Altitudes because the air is more dense.
This applies to any engine.
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@zenoist2 That is a bunch of BS. I asked a friend of mine who flies a 757 and 747 (30 years experience) that question. He said altitude has nothing to do with the engine performance they are capable of full power, full speed at 2 feet off the ground.
I don't know what is so hard to understand about this day. Its fairly straightforward. And all laid out for you in audio from the planes and video from 40 different angles.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@zenoist2 That is a bunch of Youtube nonsense!! I asked a friend of mine who flies a 757 this question and this is what he said. "No.. not at all.. the altitude has nothing to do with the engines performance, it has no bearing what so ever on the engines. I can fly the plane at full speed at 10 feet if i wanted to". And he is a captain on a 757 and was on a 747 also with a military trained background.
Holes in the story? More like too much BS on line!!!
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zenoist2 ..... the pilot's opinion is certainly valid and reliable. However, if it could go to prove something, that would be that the planes were either flown by highly experience