I already knew eisensteins criterion, but I greatly thank you for adding new content to youtube, instead of all the fifth grade level crap that redundantly redundantly plagues youtube. You cannot learn anything new on this site. The only ones contributing intelligent content are foreigners and typically in other languages. I despise it!
There are caveats to this mentioned in the wikipedia. One is applying the rules to the reversal of the coefficients. Another one has something to do with non-primitive polynomials and, even when the criterion is met, we could still have a real integer prime root. (something like that). Perhaps you can explain these better. I do appreciate the proof though, quite simple.
I already knew eisensteins criterion, but I greatly thank you for adding new content to youtube, instead of all the fifth grade level crap that redundantly redundantly plagues youtube. You cannot learn anything new on this site. The only ones contributing intelligent content are foreigners and typically in other languages. I despise it!
CogitoErgoCogitoSum 1 month ago
There are caveats to this mentioned in the wikipedia. One is applying the rules to the reversal of the coefficients. Another one has something to do with non-primitive polynomials and, even when the criterion is met, we could still have a real integer prime root. (something like that). Perhaps you can explain these better. I do appreciate the proof though, quite simple.
CogitoErgoCogitoSum 1 month ago