"PUREX (PlutoniumURanium EXtraction) reprocesses spent nuclear fuel to extract uranium and plutonium to form a mixed oxide (MOX) fuel for reuse in nuclear reactors. Weapons grade plutonium can be added to the fuel mix."
"as of 2003 there were somewhere between 50 and 100 plutonium-powered pacemakers"
"Plutonium-238 mixed with beryllium is used to generate neutrons for research purposes."
Bad newscaster, bad. And the above is just the stuff I skimmed over.
Sure, they are all good as long as you pay for them all. NOT FROM MY PCOKET! We can build some good old coal power plant if you don't want to pay for them.
I never understand why people think burning plutonium as fuel is more dangerous than storing tons of it in piles. Its the piles of plutonium that i worry about, not people at the power plant trying to steal power plant grade plutonium-uranium oxide....
Who cares if a terrorist gets his hands on some fuel grade PuMOX. he'll be able to power his PuMOX powered AK 47 laser rifle cannon.
The critical mass of plutonium is slightly over five kilograms so the ninty thousand kilograms mentioned here is sufficient for building about 18,000 bombs.
japan is a smart country, low crime rate, quality education, low unemployment and low birth rates because having too many kids is stupid. and most of all, huge technological contribution to the world.
why the heck are we constantly pickin chicken fights with Abajamadeenabajadoooo in Iran when here is a country that blatantly has barrels and barrels of glowing green stuff (plutonium) that could turn us into crispy treats? man, would someone please impeach that white trash Nazi Bush? please?
Nuclear is not the best option because a lot of radioactive waste is produced. If you get contaminated you won't get super powers you'll die.
Best option is to use not just nuclear but also solar energy, wind power, geo-thermal, hydro dams, ocean current harnessing turbines, and all the others in combination. Depending on one source is foolish.
Actually Nuclear is the best option, because it can generate huge amount of base-load power, that only hydro and geothermal can compete without being limited to a few locations. Also countries that already have low emission like France, Finland and Sweden depend heavily on nuclear as result they also have the cleanest air in the industrialized world.
also, 99% of waste can be recycled into more fuel, and the stuff left over turns into lead after about 100 years, rather then 100,000 for unrecycled fuel.
Since Fukushima Japan has decided to build a huge national solar power array to REPLACE nuclear
Solar will be cheaper than coal in 10 years
BeondaPale 7 months ago
Just reopen the damn reactors!
MarsMoonEuropa 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why energy nuclear,warning!!!
Elaine67151 11 months ago
why energy nuclear
Elaine67151 11 months ago
Atomkraft nein danke
hesperius 1 year ago
@hesperius Atomkraft ja bitte.
MarsMoonEuropa 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy magnet motor , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
baccaratbargaineq 1 year ago
Plutonium only good for making bombs?
"PUREX (PlutoniumURanium EXtraction) reprocesses spent nuclear fuel to extract uranium and plutonium to form a mixed oxide (MOX) fuel for reuse in nuclear reactors. Weapons grade plutonium can be added to the fuel mix."
"as of 2003 there were somewhere between 50 and 100 plutonium-powered pacemakers"
"Plutonium-238 mixed with beryllium is used to generate neutrons for research purposes."
Bad newscaster, bad. And the above is just the stuff I skimmed over.
jimius 2 years ago 3
I second.
1rootle 2 years ago
problem is simple...use nuclear fission powerplants until nuclear fusion is viable.
Kamadeva01 2 years ago 3
@Kamadeva01 Or just keep using them with fission reactors!
MarsMoonEuropa 9 months ago
Harness the wind, the sun and the waves,
WE DON'T NEED THIS FILTHY NUCLEAR WASTE!
jpfidric 3 years ago
Sure, they are all good as long as you pay for them all. NOT FROM MY PCOKET! We can build some good old coal power plant if you don't want to pay for them.
wtuanmu 3 years ago
wtuanmu, when was the last time you watched the news you fucking idiot?!
dackjaniels555 3 years ago
if we were to use wind, sun and waves we would not have enough energy to do shit in the world.
and in addition nuclear energy is the cleanest form of energy today so i don't really know why we aren't suppose to use it.
Coleostro 2 years ago 6
This video is totally misleading. Some of the most obvious "errors":
-a third of Japon's electricity comes from nuclear power (and not of total energy, the difference is cars' gas, housing heating...)
-Correct, Plutonium is a product of the reprocessing. But it is used by Japon to make MOX fuels assemblies, that are then used in Japon'power plants.
arnorev 3 years ago 2
Japan's first MOX plant is yet to come on line, and may never come on line due to stern public opposition
crapulike 3 years ago
I never understand why people think burning plutonium as fuel is more dangerous than storing tons of it in piles. Its the piles of plutonium that i worry about, not people at the power plant trying to steal power plant grade plutonium-uranium oxide....
Who cares if a terrorist gets his hands on some fuel grade PuMOX. he'll be able to power his PuMOX powered AK 47 laser rifle cannon.
TheMetalPerson 2 years ago
This is great news for Japan, the more they depend on clean nuclear energy the less they depend on fossil fuels.
andresfusion 3 years ago
The critical mass of plutonium is slightly over five kilograms so the ninty thousand kilograms mentioned here is sufficient for building about 18,000 bombs.
TECHKLEC 3 years ago
lets go back to stone age!!
willesdon 3 years ago 4
yes and live to the ripe old age of 20
jpnasty 3 years ago 5
japan is a smart country, low crime rate, quality education, low unemployment and low birth rates because having too many kids is stupid. and most of all, huge technological contribution to the world.
raulitech 3 years ago 10
why the heck are we constantly pickin chicken fights with Abajamadeenabajadoooo in Iran when here is a country that blatantly has barrels and barrels of glowing green stuff (plutonium) that could turn us into crispy treats? man, would someone please impeach that white trash Nazi Bush? please?
ratonnewmex 3 years ago
Japan most certainly has the know how to build a nuclear bomb but I doubt that the populous would allow the government and military to do so.
You can't also forget that the United States has military forces in Japan.
jerkinp 3 years ago
oh yeah, that's right. shame on me for not using my college degree on that one....thanx.
ratonnewmex 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Japan is ruining the earth.
x11115 3 years ago
Explain.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
I think America is doing it faster...
flamablesteve 3 years ago 7
Nuclear is the best option for enegergy
tkstka 3 years ago 2
Nuclear is not the best option because a lot of radioactive waste is produced. If you get contaminated you won't get super powers you'll die.
Best option is to use not just nuclear but also solar energy, wind power, geo-thermal, hydro dams, ocean current harnessing turbines, and all the others in combination. Depending on one source is foolish.
jerkinp 3 years ago
Actually Nuclear is the best option, because it can generate huge amount of base-load power, that only hydro and geothermal can compete without being limited to a few locations. Also countries that already have low emission like France, Finland and Sweden depend heavily on nuclear as result they also have the cleanest air in the industrialized world.
andresfusion 3 years ago 3
also, 99% of waste can be recycled into more fuel, and the stuff left over turns into lead after about 100 years, rather then 100,000 for unrecycled fuel.
spacehelmetforacow 2 years ago