umpire is a Moron, but how mean is the commentator...u r coloured mate.... this is why people like Ali the legendary boxer hates u whites ....u guys r motherfuckers with out any balls pussies white pussy commentator
As the commentators indicate it was clearly the umpires fault, their signals should be one hundred percent clear, walking away from his position would normaly show that over had been called. The Bell runout was similar but it was the Indian feilders giving off confusing body language, so Bell should have waited.
@c3vzn Where was bell when that happened? (Morgan was at the bowlers end right?) Was Bell following only the body language of the Indian fielders or did he see that too as he got to the middle of the pitch? That would be important, because if an umpire gave confusing "signals" as well as the oposition you could realy understand what Bell did. Morgan was clearly more cautious and was trying to send him back, I don' think Bell believed the Indians would go for a run out, they were so relaxed too.
New Zealand did nothing wrong at all, Murli was silly enough to think the ball was dead. I think it was holding today after the Bell 'incident' said "Bell effectively thought he was the empire" and the same goes for Murli, You play until the EMPIRE calls over or what not. the spirit of the game doesn't come into this at all. And if you want spirit go and watch Vettori give Collingwood a reprieve, after what happened t the Oval aswel...
@celph1980 in the same match mccullum walks out of his crease before the umpire calls over and sanga warns him not to do it. He could have done the same thing to mccullum. Sri Lanka won spirit of the game award for 3 years in a row. You don't take advantage when a player goes to congratulate the other player. That's just not cricket. Search for 'Marven calling symonds back' on youtube if you wanna see how cricket should be played.
It is out, because the ball not end. 1.batsman not spend in crease few seconds
2.throw not completed that is Out.see
India vs eng match IanBell is clearly runout becuase that bowl not ended.ball ending rule 1. Gone boundary 2.Lost wicket 3.Batsman spend in crease few seconds or end throw by tunerman 143 formore details watch for my channel thank you.
It is out, because the ball not end. 1.batsman not spend in crease few seconds
2.throw not completed that is Out.
Indiaveng i.bell is clearly runout becuase that bowl not end.ball ending rule 1. Gone boundary 2.Lost wicket 3.Batsman spend in crease few seconds 4.end throw
@rodeo179 the difference with the Sidebottom incident is that the NZ player did nothing wrong - it was an accidental collision. Here, Murali was naive and made a bad error. Therefore, he deserved to pay the penalty and be called out. You play until the ball is dead - its the first thing a batsman is taught. Bell made a similar error today and should have been out as well.
Of course the ball isn't dead, but this is very unsportsmanlike. McCullum is a dirty cheating scumbag cunt - just watch the video of him claiming a false catch against Bangladesh
@Palazzo True but that does is dead from the point of view of not letting the batsman take a run while the ball is being delivered back to the bowler. It does not mean it is dead here.
I'm sorry if others have already noticed and discussed about this, but it seems the umpire is gesturing with his right arm to someone at 0.36 What exactly is he saying?
I think murali shd hv ground his bat properly by touching it with ground first and then lifting it again in air to do the same ground touching with bat again . I used to this habit of grounding the bat ...wt u guyz say ??
i hate biased australian/nz commentators and pundits. that was clearly a dead. rudi messed up hard. trying to justify his hand signal as telling murali to get back in is bs.
umpire confused murali....In general after a strike if the umpire is walking/in motion that means the ball is dead....so in this case the umpire started walking towards the wickets which made murali think that the ball is dead...so i dont see why its murali's fault.....umpire was kinda making it confusing....
@KereHeath u racist fuck ... why areyou calling ppl rag heads ... and did uc the cheating catch by McCullum that cheated Shakib off his century ... once a cheat alawys a cheat
@1ceylon hello darling, i know it's been six months but i just have to ask, how do drugs help a spin bowler. steroids help with speed and bulk but for the life of me i cannot understand how they would assist Warnie spin the ball. surely the skill of Warnie was in his wrist. PS I'm a 56 yo grandmonther so please don't be rude in your response.
myfriendshipalways, how can we respect your comment about indians not having sportsmanship when you can't even spell your's own players's name right........you dumb fuck!
this is different to the collingwood run out against NZ yesterday.. in this case murili left the crease before the ball had been reuturned from the boundary, McCullum had every right to run him out.. it was just reckless on murili's behalf. the ball isnt dead untill the ball is in the keepers hands
Murali was out but everyone knew he wasn't running, McCullum should't have run him out. Plus what on earth is the umpire doing? The umpire only walks down once the ball is dead.
First of all a Square Leg umpire shouldn't have to move unless:
1) The ball is dead
2) The ball is heading in his direction.
Secondly, whomever was the captain of New Zealand should have retracted the appeal afterwards. (Like how Paul Collingwood should have for that disastrous appeal a few months ago against someone)
Thirdly Murali shouldn't have been so reckless, always wait until the keeper has the ball. As umpires (and I umpire myself) can be a bitch.
OR u can say that this is the most dumbest dismissal ever..... even umpire told him to stay in the crease... he could have wait atleast till keeper received the ball... sangakara wasnt gonna gonna run away anywhere........
It isn't cheating really, he was doing his job. VERY unsportsmanlike though. It was the Umpire's decision to distract Murali and then to not give dead ball.
Its out brother clear run out its in law the ball is not yet been finished and he leaves the crease while the ball is been thrown at keeper means he was looking for run while he had no intention of second run but rules are rules
i understand that murali was confused by the umpire walking to square leg bcoz Sangakarra's left handed and murali is right handed but surely he could have been able to see that the ball was coming back to mccullum and wasn't dead
warne didn't take as many wickets as murali murali didn't have to compete with legendary wicket-takers w didn't regularly take wickets against australia m struggled in australia w took more wickets against tailenders m only took wickets against the minnows w was backed up by a stronger bowling attack m played in places of the world with better pitches for spin w had the advantage of turning it away from the right-hander m chucked w did drugs fucker always argue over stupid shit
Nice video. But don't know what to say if it is funny or if it is lack of presence by the batsman. Sri Lankan team would be giving their best in the upcoming T20 World Cup 2009 including India. With Pepsi First Ball ka Captain contest, atleast 40 of the Indian cricket lovers can now win a chance to even watch a live ICC T20 cricket match in England.
Thats a blunder man, especially because the umpire was walking its assumed to be a dead ball, otherwise umpires don't move. Rudi's screwed that royally
lol. that was stupid. he shud have waited. but i dont blame NZ to get him out. the object of the game is to get the opposite out. and why d hell are ppl marking poor comment for ppl who say its murali's fault. it was murali's fault.
it is clear that Murali was going back to congratulate Sanga for his century. And by no means he was going for a run, he creased his bat. And it was not out.
Rudy Kortzen has made a blunder here and by no means it was out...
it doesnt matter if hes congratulating him becuase the ball hasnt been given from either fielder to bowler or to fielder its gone straight back to the keeper and hes out of his crease. out
if the square leg umpire aproaches the wicket for any other reason than to get out of the way of a throw, the ball is dead. STUPID umpire come on man.
Murali was stupid. The ball hadn't even been returned to the keeper and he goes wandering out of his crease. He deserved to be run out for being so stupid.
I`m a Srilankan and i think mcullum was right to to do this. I'm pretty sure even sanga would have done this if he was the keeper. It was careless of murali, as a experienced campaigner he should`ve know better
what they said after the game which i agree with is that if mccullum had misfielded it they would have taken the overthrows so you need to stay in the game at all times.
Murali was clearly out. He didn't even wait until the ball was in the keepers hand. You can clearly see that Murali walked out of his crease before the ball was dead. The ball was still in play but why would the umpire motion Murali to go back? That was odd!!! Nevertheless, congrats to Kumar Sangakkara for his century!!!
I think once the umpire motioned to Murali to get back into the crease, he realized that he should not have done that. He had no choice but to give Murali out so he would still be perceived as neutral.
poor murali... what a confusion... gosh i don't think he was in 4 the second run there... then the umpire was walking that way... made murali confused...
Ok it can be judged as lacking in sportsmanship but their main aim is to win the game thats why they are all there and New Zealand were well within their rights to do that
I dont mind you using this Murali crazy run out video but to cover my logo with your's is a cheap shot. Give credit where it is due, it was uploaded and edited by me when it happened.
kiwi here nz should have said to murali lucky this time but next time not so lucky and played on, thats the problem with our world it's all about winning
anyone that retarded does not deserve to have a second chance gifted to them, it isn't primary school cricket, you should know the rule that the ball is live until it's in the keeper's hands
sympathy no...but it was obvious there was no cahnce of 2 runs...and they were never going to run two..it wasnt smart on muralis part but mccullum move was pathetic..if that happpaned to me i would not have reacted the way the lankans did..
of course it's obvious he wasn't going for a run, it's also obvious that he wasn't using his brain when he left the crease. should fielders wait to give a batter a moment to reflect on what they're doing before they take the opportunity to get them out?
screw this...hope it happens to you then your reaction would be priceless...and dnt give me that "im not stupid enough to do that"...u wouldnt understand under that much pressure and being a batsmen like murali and in an international game..
oh piss of....fkn nz had a btich fit...lanka who were treated more unfairly jsut moved on...fkn sooks nz are..i always thought of them as a good team until...i say the dressing rooms reaction..for teh england match..
The umpire shouldn't be walking in if the ball is still live. That's shoddy umpiring, and I can understand Murali's confusion.
And it's totally different. England have apologised for their run-out, yet are still castigated. New Zealand took advantage of an umpiring mistake, and nobody really cared.
Umpire is at fault - shouldn't wander around like that if the ball was 'live'. He could see his mistake; hence he waves Murali back. Murali was maybe a little too eager.
Elliot ran the wrong side, could've been blocking off Sidebottom: the batter must give way to the bowler and Ryan was justified in going for the ball.
This is another example of bad sportsmanship. Even if Murali thought the ball was dead and it wasn't, it is NOT in the spirit of the game to act like McCollum did. Nor like Collingwood did. Remember Tony Greg throwing down ?Kallicheran's wicket off the last ball of the day as Kali walked off to the pavillion?
Bad sportsmanship for Greg, Collingwood AND McCollum. Don't try to defend this because you're a Kiwi! It's bad for the game.
Im a Kiwi so I suppose I would agree with most sentiments on here. I think Murali was just careless and made a mistake here. I dont think its the same as the Elliot run out.
Although credit to Collingwood he did realise hed made a mistake and apologised afterwards.
This is completely different to England today, full stop. Murali wasn't incapacitated in any way, just stupid.
By the way, does anybody else remember a game NZ vs. SA a while ago where SA ran out McMillan after he clearly pulled his hamstring as he set off for a run? now THAT was probably even worse than what happened in the England game, but there was never any furore over that...
Clearly pulled his hamstring? Well why don't everyone just pull up with a "pulled hamstring" everytime we call for a stupid run. Maybe he should get of the field if he's gonna pull up injured. Not the same either as he was not impeded just unfit :-)
Big difference between the two is that no-one was preventing Murli from being inside the crease.
Anyone think that, had there been an overthrow, Murli wouldn't have taken the opportunity to canter down the other end for an extra run - especially as he was 1/4 of the way down there already?
I'm a Kiwi, and I think this is every bit as bad as England today. Regardless of the different circumstances, and even if Baz wasn't watching, Murali wasn't trying to score a 'run', so he shouldn't have been 'run out'. We should have called him back.
I cant see the connection between this runout and the England runout of Elliot. If it is sporting to call back players who don't play the game within the rules or do something stupid then what is the point in playing. Elliots chance of making his ground was removed by Sidebottoms accidental clash. It is not a contact sport so should be called a dead ball. Plus McCullum was never offered the opportunity to recall Murali unlike Collingwood.
Mccullum is a hypocrite after his reaction Vs England in todays ODI wen Grant Elliot was run-out. Fair enuf i agree it wasnt in the spirit of the game but wen u have already 'run' a batsmen out wen he clearly going 2 celebrate his partners hundred u shud expect others therefor 2 show the same level of unsporting behaviour!
umpire is a Moron, but how mean is the commentator...u r coloured mate.... this is why people like Ali the legendary boxer hates u whites ....u guys r motherfuckers with out any balls pussies white pussy commentator
JABJABRIGHTCROSS 4 months ago
Umpire's fault and bad sportsmanship
kamyueloh 5 months ago
As the commentators indicate it was clearly the umpires fault, their signals should be one hundred percent clear, walking away from his position would normaly show that over had been called. The Bell runout was similar but it was the Indian feilders giving off confusing body language, so Bell should have waited.
raysteer 5 months ago
bad sportmanship by new zealand....
MrHitler4 6 months ago
tbh i would have run him out too he came out of his crease way too early not like the bell run out where the umpire even gave the bowler his cap.
c3vzn 6 months ago
@c3vzn Where was bell when that happened? (Morgan was at the bowlers end right?) Was Bell following only the body language of the Indian fielders or did he see that too as he got to the middle of the pitch? That would be important, because if an umpire gave confusing "signals" as well as the oposition you could realy understand what Bell did. Morgan was clearly more cautious and was trying to send him back, I don' think Bell believed the Indians would go for a run out, they were so relaxed too.
raysteer 5 months ago
EMPIRE!!!!??? (In reply to the comment below)
They have nothing to do with it, and were defeated a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.
Decision should have been reversed. Blatant celebration and not second run.
CrossSection8 6 months ago
New Zealand did nothing wrong at all, Murli was silly enough to think the ball was dead. I think it was holding today after the Bell 'incident' said "Bell effectively thought he was the empire" and the same goes for Murli, You play until the EMPIRE calls over or what not. the spirit of the game doesn't come into this at all. And if you want spirit go and watch Vettori give Collingwood a reprieve, after what happened t the Oval aswel...
celph1980 6 months ago
@celph1980 in the same match mccullum walks out of his crease before the umpire calls over and sanga warns him not to do it. He could have done the same thing to mccullum. Sri Lanka won spirit of the game award for 3 years in a row. You don't take advantage when a player goes to congratulate the other player. That's just not cricket. Search for 'Marven calling symonds back' on youtube if you wanna see how cricket should be played.
dasiths 6 months ago
It is out, because the ball not end. 1.batsman not spend in crease few seconds
2.throw not completed that is Out.see
India vs eng match IanBell is clearly runout becuase that bowl not ended.ball ending rule 1. Gone boundary 2.Lost wicket 3.Batsman spend in crease few seconds or end throw by tunerman 143 formore details watch for my channel thank you.
Tunerman143 6 months ago
It is out, because the ball not end. 1.batsman not spend in crease few seconds
2.throw not completed that is Out.
Indiaveng i.bell is clearly runout becuase that bowl not end.ball ending rule 1. Gone boundary 2.Lost wicket 3.Batsman spend in crease few seconds 4.end throw
Tunerman143 6 months ago
very poor stuff from the kiwis...
hemalcompany 6 months ago
and then they whine over sidebottom's incident
rodeo179 6 months ago
@rodeo179 the difference with the Sidebottom incident is that the NZ player did nothing wrong - it was an accidental collision. Here, Murali was naive and made a bad error. Therefore, he deserved to pay the penalty and be called out. You play until the ball is dead - its the first thing a batsman is taught. Bell made a similar error today and should have been out as well.
jitterbugbhoy 6 months ago
McCullum=prick
crazymanrameswaren 6 months ago
came here to watch this after the bizarre incident in the India v England test involving BELL... what a comical situation that was!! :D
MrRoo10ney 6 months ago 12
I guess NZ being so shit at cricket needs to resort to things like this to actually have a chance at competing with world class sides :P
pubuman 6 months ago
hahah tame thing happend england vs newzeland match lol poor nzlnds
vedasinghe 6 months ago
MM should know what is a DEAD BALL! THE BALL WASNT DEAD!
tbipenguin 8 months ago
Of course the ball isn't dead, but this is very unsportsmanlike. McCullum is a dirty cheating scumbag cunt - just watch the video of him claiming a false catch against Bangladesh
Detective313 9 months ago
That pretty much sums up Murali's knowledge of the rules of cricket. Thrower.
DyingSID666 9 months ago
@DyingSID666 sums up your knowledge of the throwing laws as well
crazycurry90 7 months ago
@DyingSID666 wow. you'd bring that up anywhere wouldn't you? very irrelevant mate
dilpium 6 months ago
its out. but thats murali. i love him :)
amilagmail 11 months ago
Bad bad sportsmanship by New Zealand
I am disappoint
UtopiaIsInMyMind 11 months ago 20
poor by NZL
msalmaninoz 11 months ago
Just to clarify (from the laws of cricket):
The ball becomes dead when:
(i) it is finally settled in the hands of the wicket-keeper or of the bowler
Palazzo 1 year ago
@Palazzo True but that does is dead from the point of view of not letting the batsman take a run while the ball is being delivered back to the bowler. It does not mean it is dead here.
wardos69 9 months ago
@wardos69 That's what I was saying. The ball wasn't dead.
Palazzo 9 months ago
lol, murali thought the ball was dead as soon as fine leg picked up the ball
omonoia23 1 year ago
I'm sorry if others have already noticed and discussed about this, but it seems the umpire is gesturing with his right arm to someone at 0.36 What exactly is he saying?
MrBooruwa 1 year ago
I think murali shd hv ground his bat properly by touching it with ground first and then lifting it again in air to do the same ground touching with bat again . I used to this habit of grounding the bat ...wt u guyz say ??
zfjquery 1 year ago
been a cricket fan all my life but i dont get that :L
im pretty sure murali has put the bat in the crease and so has sangakkarra.
sorry
Shawnmichaelsno1fan 1 year ago
sorry am new to cricket....how does one know when the ball is dead.
majesticmaniac 1 year ago
@majesticmaniac the wicket keeper or fielder at the bowling end has to hold the ball pretty much, if the ball is moving it's in play
presariO29 1 year ago
@majesticmaniac ...You got to check the pulse beat...sorry i am new as well :)
mjb1320 1 year ago
@majesticmaniac good question. I've been a cricket fan all my life and I'm still not sure
Also, if you're not going for another run, you can yell "safe" to prevent this exact thing from happening
John3285 1 year ago
@John3285 Nah mate that is school yard cricket. Nowhere in the laws can this be found.
wardos69 9 months ago
@John3285 Nah mate that is school yard cricket. Nowhere in the laws can this be found.
wardos69 9 months ago
Yes hen the umpire is walking it is assumed that its a dead ball
Not out. If any asian wteam would have done this the palyer would have been banned for two matches
Bhuddababajee 1 year ago
Comment removed
RO009 1 year ago
Comment removed
RO009 1 year ago
Comment removed
RO009 1 year ago
Stupid Rudy,he made everybody nuts
AirMarshal81 1 year ago
Unsporting from Kiwis! N NZL cricket commentators are partial as hell any given day!
ushailendra123 1 year ago
i hate biased australian/nz commentators and pundits. that was clearly a dead. rudi messed up hard. trying to justify his hand signal as telling murali to get back in is bs.
woddlebot 1 year ago
stupid lankans.
drifter639 1 year ago
it was not sport man sprit from macullum
masroor111 1 year ago
All thing's work out for the good of those who love the Lord who's called according to his purpose!
brotherfrank62 1 year ago
all i can say "Smart ass umpire"
LoChUk 1 year ago
umpire confused murali....In general after a strike if the umpire is walking/in motion that means the ball is dead....so in this case the umpire started walking towards the wickets which made murali think that the ball is dead...so i dont see why its murali's fault.....umpire was kinda making it confusing....
sashafun9 1 year ago 6
Lol its Murali's fault, he should of stayed in his crease until the ball was dead, but then again the umpire shouldn't have been walking in either.
StupidLoserChannel69 1 year ago 3
endian?
kalabalatala 1 year ago
I don't see McCullum's fault here, to be honest umpire should have asked umpire if they wanna call him back...
vinipandya 1 year ago
this vid has nothin to do with race , he was run out the wholke point is that
koteshy1 1 year ago
Comment removed
pitskull 2 years ago
Kiwis and Aussies have colour line fever. Islanders, wait for next Tsunami in Pacific.
Indiancrab 2 years ago
Yeah, did look like a 'take the bails off, you'll get a wicket here' as opposed to 'get back or you could be run out'
ashliski 2 years ago
So whats the difference between that and Collingwood's stumping? Why was Murali not asked to return and Collingwood was?
ashliski 2 years ago
Cheating from Kiwis. Kiwis can't play Cricket and Kiwland is really a Rugby Nation. Rest of the Sports sucks in Newzeland.
Indiancrab 2 years ago
Comment removed
KereHeath 2 years ago
your a twat how does murali chuck? he better than shane the fucking warne pisshead. you stupid nube. use your brain, no wait u havent got one.
mhmdhsm23 2 years ago
Oi rag head fuck off, whats shane warne got to do with this, Fuck off untill you have a decent comment to say
KereHeath 2 years ago
@KereHeath u racist fuck ... why areyou calling ppl rag heads ... and did uc the cheating catch by McCullum that cheated Shakib off his century ... once a cheat alawys a cheat
enaner 1 year ago 3
he is not a cheat he hardly knew it was touching, pace!!! with that speed you never know
vinipandya 1 year ago
Comment removed
madhuyouid 1 year ago
Comment removed
KereHeath 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@madhuyouid I dont give a rats arse about Shane Warne, and what kind of word is toppest?? Im a kiwi you dumb fuck shane warne is Australian
KereHeath 1 year ago
Comment removed
madhuyouid 1 year ago
what load of bull shit
LOLMAN22 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Shane Warne took drugs, He was banned. He is a cheat! CHEAT !. DELETE ALL HIS RECORDS!!!
1ceylon 2 years ago
@1ceylon hello darling, i know it's been six months but i just have to ask, how do drugs help a spin bowler. steroids help with speed and bulk but for the life of me i cannot understand how they would assist Warnie spin the ball. surely the skill of Warnie was in his wrist. PS I'm a 56 yo grandmonther so please don't be rude in your response.
teachinoz 1 year ago
who's the commentator? motion to batman ? haha ...
myfriendshipalways 2 years ago
Just imagine had Mccullam missed that throw and if the ball gone to the fence, then SL would have taken a extra 3 runs.
nidharshanf 2 years ago
Hey dude we are not Indians ok.. no sportsmanship at all.. i think New Zealander are good bunch of players except McCaullum ...
myfriendshipalways 2 years ago 2
Murali, forgot the fundamental basic of cricket, I am a Sri Lankan, Mccullam did the right thing. sSL had to pay the prize because of his careless.
nidharshanf 2 years ago
myfriendshipalways, how can we respect your comment about indians not having sportsmanship when you can't even spell your's own players's name right........you dumb fuck!
CubsFan621 2 years ago
@myfriendshipalways well it would help if you could spell his name right and it is fair thats just like turning for the second run
jbizzleness 1 year ago
this is different to the collingwood run out against NZ yesterday.. in this case murili left the crease before the ball had been reuturned from the boundary, McCullum had every right to run him out.. it was just reckless on murili's behalf. the ball isnt dead untill the ball is in the keepers hands
08flausy 2 years ago
Murali was out but everyone knew he wasn't running, McCullum should't have run him out. Plus what on earth is the umpire doing? The umpire only walks down once the ball is dead.
pendleaussie 2 years ago 2
they must've been pretty desperate
ilovetopickmynose 2 years ago 2
First of all a Square Leg umpire shouldn't have to move unless:
1) The ball is dead
2) The ball is heading in his direction.
Secondly, whomever was the captain of New Zealand should have retracted the appeal afterwards. (Like how Paul Collingwood should have for that disastrous appeal a few months ago against someone)
Thirdly Murali shouldn't have been so reckless, always wait until the keeper has the ball. As umpires (and I umpire myself) can be a bitch.
TheReadingStudent 2 years ago 3
this was d most unsportsmanlike dissmissal ever...shame on mcculum cheater
assasinprav 2 years ago
OR u can say that this is the most dumbest dismissal ever..... even umpire told him to stay in the crease... he could have wait atleast till keeper received the ball... sangakara wasnt gonna gonna run away anywhere........
crick3tcr4zy 2 years ago
It isn't cheating really, he was doing his job. VERY unsportsmanlike though. It was the Umpire's decision to distract Murali and then to not give dead ball.
TheReadingStudent 2 years ago 3
How funny was this? Why are there so many wierd run outs in NZ?
RedHillRabbitoh 2 years ago
What a dumbass! The umpire was almost telling him to get back.
Even 10 year olds know not to leave the crease like that.
pup218 2 years ago
Its out brother clear run out its in law the ball is not yet been finished and he leaves the crease while the ball is been thrown at keeper means he was looking for run while he had no intention of second run but rules are rules
BBASECC 2 years ago
he shouldnt be out what a stupid umpire
burnley854 2 years ago
Muttiah Muralitharan is a legend of world cricket... also watch my uploaded videos
itsoook 2 years ago
i understand that murali was confused by the umpire walking to square leg bcoz Sangakarra's left handed and murali is right handed but surely he could have been able to see that the ball was coming back to mccullum and wasn't dead
Ogatai1 2 years ago
did he get the century
adsonkool 2 years ago
yeah becz the run was complete so he gets the single
darius1374 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Warne is an ordinary bowler and got only tailenders at the expense of McGrath. His name is Mr TAIL-ENDER,
Warne took duiretics, which is a masking agents for drugs. He took duiretics because he took drugs and to cover it.
Warne is a cheat and a chucker.
He got away from chucking because He is an aussie, white and a racist.
Warne took diuretics, which is a masking agents for drugs
stj1003 2 years ago
You are a fucker you know that
gilchrist566 2 years ago
huntergatherers 2 years ago
Nice video. But don't know what to say if it is funny or if it is lack of presence by the batsman. Sri Lankan team would be giving their best in the upcoming T20 World Cup 2009 including India. With Pepsi First Ball ka Captain contest, atleast 40 of the Indian cricket lovers can now win a chance to even watch a live ICC T20 cricket match in England.
jesswalt01 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Warne is an ordinary bowler and got only tailenders at the expense of McGrath. His name is Mr TAIL-ENDER,
Warne took duiretics, which is a masking agents for drugs. He took duiretics because he took drugs and to cover it.
Warne is a cheat and a chucker.
He got away from chucking because He is an aussie, white and a racist.
Warne took diuretics, which is a masking agents for drugs. He took diuretics because he took drugs and to cover it
stj1003 2 years ago
notice on 0:06 - "Sangakarra was gifted his 100"
WTF does that mean? Bad ball on leg side or gifted his 100 because they bowling sucked and he didn't have to do much?
14Jibbs14 2 years ago
Warne is an ordinary bowler and got only tailenders at the expense of McGrath. His name is Mr TAIL-ENDER,
Warne took duiretics, which is a masking agents for drugs. He took duiretics because he took drugs and to cover it.
Warne is a cheat and a chucker.
He got away from chucking because He is an aussie, white and a racist.
Warne took diuretics, which is a masking agents for drugs. He took diuretics because he took drugs and to cover it
stj1003 2 years ago
what was the score at the time that's why they appealed
duxberry1958 2 years ago
i agreen wid ro009 but i dont know that many international teams that would have with held the appeal
50kamakazi05 2 years ago
i agreen wid ro009
abhinayan27 2 years ago
strictly speaking murali was out...but in the spirit of the game new zealand should have witheld the appeal!
RO009 2 years ago 27
Thats a blunder man, especially because the umpire was walking its assumed to be a dead ball, otherwise umpires don't move. Rudi's screwed that royally
currystud 2 years ago 29
lol. that was stupid. he shud have waited. but i dont blame NZ to get him out. the object of the game is to get the opposite out. and why d hell are ppl marking poor comment for ppl who say its murali's fault. it was murali's fault.
akshaysharma106 2 years ago
it is clear that Murali was going back to congratulate Sanga for his century. And by no means he was going for a run, he creased his bat. And it was not out.
Rudy Kortzen has made a blunder here and by no means it was out...
nook3y 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
jocylinbanda 2 years ago
Macalam is a shy for all newzes and cricket too.
yohalweere 2 years ago
what a way to celebrate a hundred hahaha
panbatta 2 years ago
it doesnt matter if hes congratulating him becuase the ball hasnt been given from either fielder to bowler or to fielder its gone straight back to the keeper and hes out of his crease. out
marty182 2 years ago
Stupid decision. He was going to congratulate Kumar, wasn't even attempting a run.
Mirpuria 3 years ago
The ball hadn't even got to McCullum.. so it's Murali's bad lol.
aWpIeS 2 years ago
if the square leg umpire aproaches the wicket for any other reason than to get out of the way of a throw, the ball is dead. STUPID umpire come on man.
matthewosterloh 3 years ago
Murali was stupid. The ball hadn't even been returned to the keeper and he goes wandering out of his crease. He deserved to be run out for being so stupid.
TheWheelieBin 3 years ago
veru bad frnd.macallum is the stupid one
yohalweere 2 years ago
had that been overthrow, you would have taken it!!!!!!
vinipandya 1 year ago
I`m a Srilankan and i think mcullum was right to to do this. I'm pretty sure even sanga would have done this if he was the keeper. It was careless of murali, as a experienced campaigner he should`ve know better
ducking0101 3 years ago
what they said after the game which i agree with is that if mccullum had misfielded it they would have taken the overthrows so you need to stay in the game at all times.
abesraham 3 years ago
Thz z too bad for the Furure of the cricket!!! NZ sucks..!!
nipunagomes 3 years ago
no way i am indian and sometimes i feel nz is better, just good enough
vinipandya 1 year ago
LOL... Nuisance...get lost!!
I jst outlined e behavior of their players.. hilarious... lmao!!
nipunagomes 1 year ago
Hate to admit it being a kiwi and all but this is right up there with the underarm incident. Poor sportmanship.
midsta 3 years ago
One of the most disgraceful moment in the test cricket. Where was the NZ captain @ that time....
srilacha 3 years ago
bad sportsmanship... he was not going for a second run he was celebrating the 100.... technically yes, but not in the spirit of the game
sleuth51 3 years ago
50.50 but mccullum was copping it after the game
haff619 3 years ago
This is not cricket.
faisalnadeem 3 years ago
Murali was clearly out. He didn't even wait until the ball was in the keepers hand. You can clearly see that Murali walked out of his crease before the ball was dead. The ball was still in play but why would the umpire motion Murali to go back? That was odd!!! Nevertheless, congrats to Kumar Sangakkara for his century!!!
dyb4life 3 years ago
Kiwi's should be ashamed, not within the spirit of the game.
xratedcheese 3 years ago
An Aussie would steal a candy from a baby then wait for congrats from his mates LOL...ITS FUNNY B/C ITS TRUE
raydawg325 3 years ago
why is every one saying that the kiwis and the umpires are cheating its muralis fault for being a idiot
jodie499 3 years ago 4
yeh but there is sportmanship... there as no intent to run he wanted congratulate his mate....
ajjbennett 3 years ago
yea but he should have waited til the ball was dead
sportyguy134 2 years ago
not in the spirit of teh game at all.
wbc5380 3 years ago
Spirit of the game lies in playing it professionally and putting aside lame excuses.
ithejuggernaut 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Warne is a cheat and a chucker.
He got away from chucking because He is an aussie, white and a racist.
Warne took duiretics, which is a masking agents for drugs. He took duiretics because he took drugs and to cover it. His wickets are worthless.
warne2druggie 3 years ago
I think once the umpire motioned to Murali to get back into the crease, he realized that he should not have done that. He had no choice but to give Murali out so he would still be perceived as neutral.
typecastyourself 3 years ago
Cheap dismissal.. didn't expect this from kiwis
shivapowerprasad 3 years ago
:S!
Murali put his bat in but since Sangakara was not in his crease when murali put his bat in the crease! so it was considered they were running!
But smart keeper he did not see him putting bat in or he would not have run him out!
crazykillller 3 years ago
thats the behaviour of a bunch of inbred sheep fuckers
riwajch 3 years ago
have you got a real arugment or do you just resort to calling people names like a child
Joelberg11 3 years ago
Original.
Nyxzen 3 years ago
This is shocking sportmanship from NZ.....If an Aussie had done this everyone would be saying what cheats you are!!
Aussiephil99 3 years ago
poor murali... what a confusion... gosh i don't think he was in 4 the second run there... then the umpire was walking that way... made murali confused...
coolzj439 3 years ago 3
superb
freshmak 3 years ago
Ok it can be judged as lacking in sportsmanship but their main aim is to win the game thats why they are all there and New Zealand were well within their rights to do that
Smile35 3 years ago 2
I dont mind you using this Murali crazy run out video but to cover my logo with your's is a cheap shot. Give credit where it is due, it was uploaded and edited by me when it happened.
islandcricket 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
horny lol? yerrr i am! my names Elizabeth fancy a webcam chat wher i might treat u!!!!! cum join me Play-Cam (.COM)
veredhalal 3 years ago
Definitely with in the rights to take the stumps off,and just poor judgement by Murali!
It wasnt helped by the Umpire Rudy walking in like that either!
gjpoontang 3 years ago
NZ whinge about sportsmanship when it suits them.
diggler2002 3 years ago
kiwi here nz should have said to murali lucky this time but next time not so lucky and played on, thats the problem with our world it's all about winning
stevefazak 3 years ago
anyone that retarded does not deserve to have a second chance gifted to them, it isn't primary school cricket, you should know the rule that the ball is live until it's in the keeper's hands
dnarmstr 3 years ago
true...but bad sportmanship...
dilshan9 3 years ago
so for you, a good sportsman has to have sympathy?
dnarmstr 3 years ago
sympathy no...but it was obvious there was no cahnce of 2 runs...and they were never going to run two..it wasnt smart on muralis part but mccullum move was pathetic..if that happpaned to me i would not have reacted the way the lankans did..
dilshan9 3 years ago
of course it's obvious he wasn't going for a run, it's also obvious that he wasn't using his brain when he left the crease. should fielders wait to give a batter a moment to reflect on what they're doing before they take the opportunity to get them out?
dnarmstr 3 years ago
screw this...hope it happens to you then your reaction would be priceless...and dnt give me that "im not stupid enough to do that"...u wouldnt understand under that much pressure and being a batsmen like murali and in an international game..
dilshan9 3 years ago
there was never any hope of 2 runs but they probably would have tried for 2 if there had been an overthrow. it would have suited them then.
twc29cricket 3 years ago
and when England does the same thing, New Zealand throw a fit. Wankers!
jp2007ms 3 years ago
The two instances are entirely different JP.
Westwoooooooood 3 years ago
oh piss of....fkn nz had a btich fit...lanka who were treated more unfairly jsut moved on...fkn sooks nz are..i always thought of them as a good team until...i say the dressing rooms reaction..for teh england match..
dilshan9 3 years ago 2
couldnt have happened to a beter person, he is a filthy cheat. CHUCKER. GOOD ON YA MURALI YOU SPUD!
samvillo2 3 years ago
bladd mother fucking idiot!!!!
shenalsingapore 3 years ago
The umpire shouldn't be walking in if the ball is still live. That's shoddy umpiring, and I can understand Murali's confusion.
And it's totally different. England have apologised for their run-out, yet are still castigated. New Zealand took advantage of an umpiring mistake, and nobody really cared.
Surlish 3 years ago
Umpire is at fault - shouldn't wander around like that if the ball was 'live'. He could see his mistake; hence he waves Murali back. Murali was maybe a little too eager.
Elliot ran the wrong side, could've been blocking off Sidebottom: the batter must give way to the bowler and Ryan was justified in going for the ball.
anthonythirteen 3 years ago
LOL! You're a fucking retard.
pacus123 3 years ago
Why?
anthonythirteen 3 years ago
This is another example of bad sportsmanship. Even if Murali thought the ball was dead and it wasn't, it is NOT in the spirit of the game to act like McCollum did. Nor like Collingwood did. Remember Tony Greg throwing down ?Kallicheran's wicket off the last ball of the day as Kali walked off to the pavillion?
Bad sportsmanship for Greg, Collingwood AND McCollum. Don't try to defend this because you're a Kiwi! It's bad for the game.
tanagerbirder 3 years ago
Why is this bad sportsmanship?! Should we be sporting about an idiot who doesn't know the rules of cricket?
pacus123 3 years ago
Im a Kiwi so I suppose I would agree with most sentiments on here. I think Murali was just careless and made a mistake here. I dont think its the same as the Elliot run out.
Although credit to Collingwood he did realise hed made a mistake and apologised afterwards.
mattykuchar 3 years ago
This is completely different to England today, full stop. Murali wasn't incapacitated in any way, just stupid.
By the way, does anybody else remember a game NZ vs. SA a while ago where SA ran out McMillan after he clearly pulled his hamstring as he set off for a run? now THAT was probably even worse than what happened in the England game, but there was never any furore over that...
AngryStyro 3 years ago
Clearly pulled his hamstring? Well why don't everyone just pull up with a "pulled hamstring" everytime we call for a stupid run. Maybe he should get of the field if he's gonna pull up injured. Not the same either as he was not impeded just unfit :-)
1adunhill 3 years ago
No connection between the two incidents.
I'm English and bloody well ashamed of it after what they did.
Murali was at fault here, and Collingwood was yesterday.
Simple as.
HelsinkiP 3 years ago
Big difference between the two is that no-one was preventing Murli from being inside the crease.
Anyone think that, had there been an overthrow, Murli wouldn't have taken the opportunity to canter down the other end for an extra run - especially as he was 1/4 of the way down there already?
no thought not.
smoog 3 years ago
I'm a Kiwi, and I think this is every bit as bad as England today. Regardless of the different circumstances, and even if Baz wasn't watching, Murali wasn't trying to score a 'run', so he shouldn't have been 'run out'. We should have called him back.
flacke59 3 years ago 2
No the ball is not dead, its just a silly mistake by Murali. Its his own fault
CtrlDPredator 3 years ago 3
I cant see the connection between this runout and the England runout of Elliot. If it is sporting to call back players who don't play the game within the rules or do something stupid then what is the point in playing. Elliots chance of making his ground was removed by Sidebottoms accidental clash. It is not a contact sport so should be called a dead ball. Plus McCullum was never offered the opportunity to recall Murali unlike Collingwood.
DIYGURU 3 years ago
In anycase murali was out.. The ball was still active..
rushiraj 3 years ago
Mccullum is a hypocrite after his reaction Vs England in todays ODI wen Grant Elliot was run-out. Fair enuf i agree it wasnt in the spirit of the game but wen u have already 'run' a batsmen out wen he clearly going 2 celebrate his partners hundred u shud expect others therefor 2 show the same level of unsporting behaviour!
dirtypop08 3 years ago