New Hampshirites torch UN flag at Grafton

[stephenabm]

Get the US out of the United Nations! A war making organization and not about peace!

[TheCrystalRiver]

FUCK THE UN

[timmertootoo]

free staters are cult freaks

[TheCrystalRiver]

@timmertootoo

And you're a pussy

[PersonguydudeWB]

I need to move to that awesome state. Shrew California.

[jsmythib]

NH the only state that dosent suck...and that is one flag that should be burned-

[RebelStangII]

FREEDOM! It's worth fighting for!

[mcgrawtim123]

Nice poem Mr. Ridley, well done!

[audrey5904]

Live free or Die...I Love NH...God Bless those whom care to know the truth and all you good folks in Keene who tell it like it is. I LOVE the Freedom press. The Obama deception saved my life...It scared me so much I turned to Jesus...he is our only hope...

[lotuscassidy]

To free staters....pass a law that cops can only carry tasers, no firearms. If they need firepower they ask for citizen help. I'll bet respect for people really improves.

[txballoonman]

...and we should carry tasers too... and anything else we damn well want to carry.

[803honda]

at least your poetrys better than al gores.

[campsteveo]

Your poetry sucks, but your message is good.

May God bless your Christmas with lots of food.

:D

~SC

[josda1000]

why is this p00lman guy still trolling?! it's like he's just here to plague the ridleyreport channel.

[hellsunicorn]

@josda1000

As I stated before, p00lman is an attention seeker, probably hasn't dated anyone of the opposite sex and is unemployed considering how he seems to be on here all the time.

I really shouldn't be encouraging the little douche, but his posts are fairly amusing.

[SSILENTNATION]

Yeah right - cause all the hotties want 20 minute pillow talk on Tic Toc Ministries. You're a real live Enrico Suave. Fruitcake.

[hellsunicorn]

@SSILENTNATION

You're just butt hurt because nobody watches your shitty "troll freestaters for attention" videos.

[SSILENTNATION]

Not really....you obviously did. Purpose fulfilled. Try again?

[hellsunicorn]

@SSILENTNATION

Nope, didn't watch it, just noticed it featured on your channel when I was doing my brief scanning. The lack of intelligence in your posts doesn't really inspire one to care about whatever video work you've done.

And there is no trying to this, only me continually rehashing that 2+2=4 to a retarded kid who thinks that numbers are difficult to remember.

[SSILENTNATION]

Yet you feel others are trolls. Okay - got it Mr. Pot - you're a youtube HERO...really making a difference on that journey to Liberty.

[MooseOfReason]

Ridley, I enjoyed your poem.

[hellsunicorn]

I did some quick perusing on SSILENTNATION's, P00lman's, fczwartek's, and juliaisafilmbuff123's accounts, and I found the common thread that links these dimwitted trolls together. They all have their heads crammed clear up Noam Chomsky's ass.

I dealt with a slew of these retards about a year ago when I made a video criticizing their tin god MIT shill. They're like brain eating zombies from a horror movie, only they murmur "corporations..." instead of "brains".

[p00lman]

Sorry, but I've never read or listen to a thing Chomsky's said. Nice theory, though.

[hellsunicorn]

Oh yes you have, even if you are telling the truth about never hearing him directly (which I strongly doubt), the people you keep company with and the language that you use comes directly from him. This B.S. about "paranoia" being linked to anti-globalist sentiment, and this constant whining about people not having evidence after they've thrown it at you dozens of times is a classic example of the willful ignorance that Chombies exhibit after they've been taken apart.

[p00lman]

If you had any evidence for your raving mad claims, I wouldn't have to ask.

So where is it?

[Spazzfrom1989]

lmfao!

[p00lman]

Yeah, isn't it funny when people make paranoid accusations with no evidence whatsoever? I think so.

[SSILENTNATION]

The gig is up p00lman - he's got us dead to rights....we mind just as well come forward now and provide a bibliography for all of our youtube comments. Every month - it's a new nutjob with a battle to the death on here - lmfao.

[SSILENTNATION]

Yes - guilty as charged....nothing like curling up next to a UN flag burning with a copy of Chomsky. LOL. I perused your account as well, and watched about 20 seconds of you crying about Michael Moore or whatever crying. Then I yawned - and hit X. But yeah - really making a big difference you are - LOL.

[hellsunicorn]

That 20 seconds of viewing videos must be a habit with you in other things such as reading books and researching through other media, because that is about the extent of your intelligence. You are welcome onto my channel if you wish to continue making asinine comments, I love watching people make fools out of themselves for my friends and subs. to see.

P.S. - putting lol and lmfao is not an argument, it's a confession of brainlessness. Definitely a Chombie.

[SSILENTNATION]

1.) Your pathetic vids aren't worth leaving a comment....what makes you think I would even bother?

2.) Of course you enjoy watching people make fools of themselves, what other reason could their be for you recording yourself?

2.)Asinine comments...such as brainlessness, Chombie, douche, assumptions about personal life etc etc. Please continue....because since you claim your laughing - it must be the laughs are all on you. Please reply....go for the big one - DIG DEEPER. LOL LMFAO ESAD

[fczwartek]

"I can't be bothered with the biography of an insignificant troll."

Yeah. I'm sure you can't be. That's why you took the time to do some "research." Nice work detective.

A single mention (on my youtube account) of Noam Chomsky sends you into fits of rage apparently.

So you're a knight of the status quo corporatocracy. Do you want a medal?

You claim to be a libertarian. You carry on like a knuckle dragging republican.

Pathetic.

[hellsunicorn]

My primary beef with Noam Chomsky is his doublespeak, his outright insults towards the 9/11 truth movement (yeah, I'm totally a knuckle dragging republican, dumbass), and his slanderous statements directed at Ron Paul.

I've read several of his books, took great joy in hearing Alex Jones take that little piss ant apart, but my revulsion at his bullshit has more to do with his brain-dead followers.

You are a textbook example of how he has damaged the political opposition in this country.

[p00lman]

"That piss ant."

Ha! Nothing's more amusing than someone who can't even spell that insult they want to use.

[fczwartek]

Anyone who credits Alex Jones as a source of knowledge really has no business critiquing the work of Noam Chomsky.

Alex Jones is an ultra paranoid fringe nutcase. I used to enjoy listening to his show just to absorb my daily allotment of rage, psychosis, and bat-shit insane conspiracies. For real information? No.

Noam Chomsky said he wouldn't support Ron Paul and stated his opinion that libertarianism "would be a nightmare."

That's your idea of slander? Grow some thicker skin.

[fczwartek]

Noam Chomsky "damaged the political opposition in this country."

I'd love to hear this theory more in depth. You're great at tossing out vague and meaningless generalities.

What exactly do you mean by "political opposition"? And how did Noam Chomsky "damage" it. According to you, not Alex Jones.

Or are you just another brain dead Alex Jones clone?

[Verlch]

Before women voted the national debt was a few billion, divorce rate was 3% and the tax rate was 1%. Inflation was near zero.

[p00lman]

You mean when women were treated like property and not actual human beings?

[hellsunicorn]

I don't agree with Verlch here, but this is precisely what I am talking about. This Marxist bias towards the historical evolution of the family from a means of species survival to the current modern one (which is in deterioration thanks to the insanity of feminism) is something that Chombies (Chomsky Zombies) engage in. You may have gotten your socialistic ideas from someone else directly, but his writings have influenced most of today's leftist historical revisionists.

[p00lman]

And the abandonment of the traditional family structure is bad . . . why?

[hellsunicorn]

Visit a place where this has reached its logical conclusion like Kensington Philadelphia and try to walk a few blocks without getting shot or beaten.

The cultural changes coming from modern feminism are breeding an entire generation of bastard sons who are more prone to violent crime and sexual depravity.

[p00lman]

You think people shoot each other because feminism destroyed traditional families.

Let me see if I can top that in absurdity. I believe dinosaurs died because Abraham Lincoln didn't win at Wheel of Fortune.

[hellsunicorn]

@p00lman

And you wonder why I keep calling you a troll.

Yes, family values declining has a direct connection to rises in violent crime, though naturally other variables like the economic crash that Bush and Obama has ushered in, corrupt urban politics, and a few other elements play a part.

Feminism is a vile poison that turns women into hate spewing shrews, and this is 4 years of experience attending a feminist dominated state college speaking here.

[p00lman]

What exactly do you think feminism means, besides advocating the equal treatment of women?

[debtansey89]

The USA is a constitutional replublic, NOT a democracy!

[Verlch]

@debtansey89

We are a quasi democracy with our leaders elected by the useful idiot class. Who figure out they can vote in politicians to raid the treasure. Democracies are the road to socialism. And democracies are the road to dictatorships and always collapse over lousy fiscal policy.

[debtansey89]

The UN is the biggest human trafficker in modern history.

[p00lman]

What does this mean?

[hellsunicorn]

Human trafficking specifically denotes the selling of girls and young boys into sexual slavery, aka prostitution. Several key figures in leadership at the U.N. (and other organizations with wealthy world elite figures) are associated with this. In fact, during Bush Sr.'s 1st term there was an investigation into this that might have led to him or members of his administration being indicted, but a key witness was killed before anything could stick.

[p00lman]

So in other words, the UN isn't responsible for human trafficking, but some of the members are suspect.

Be accurate.

[hellsunicorn]

Nope, basically every major figure there is caught up in it, along with a bunch of corrupt programs that have robbed poor nations of their wealth. I don't think I need to reference the now defunct Oil For Food program.

[p00lman]

Think about what you just said. How can you rob POOR nations of their WEALTH?

[hellsunicorn]

Dumbfuckery is not an argument kid. African nations and middle eastern ones are very wealthy in natural resources, such as fossil fuels, minerals, et cetera. Even most dumb ass leftists understand this, so you are setting a new precedent for stupidity here, keep it going, I'm getting a good laugh out of it.

[p00lman]

Nope, you still contradicted yourself and haven't fixed it.

[juliaisafilmbuff123]

This is so retarded. I feel ashamed to live in NH, the guinea pig for the "Free State Project". What's wrong with the UN? So they've fucked up a few times, so what? I actually think institutions like the UN could help end the state system and help bring about a classless, stateless society. You FSP people love labeling yourselves as "anarchists" so why hate on an institution that could help bring about anarchy?

[TehBANN3D]

How uninformed do you have to be to believe a international committee of states could possibly have any motivation to end their own existence?

The UN is a tyrant's club, where tyrants get together and decide what other tyrants have to do if they don't want to be invaded. It's neither peaceful nor anarchistic. It's obvious why people wouldn't support it.

[hellsunicorn]

Like I said earlier, head lodged clear up Noam Chomsky's ass. I don't know about other anti-globalists associated with anti-U.N. activity, but anarchy is the last thing I'm interested in (particularly given its history in places like Russia).

The idea that a huge internationalist body made up of world dictators would promote their own destruction is laughable, and so is everything else you've posted on here. Par for the course with a rank and file Chombie though.

[justmy10cents]

ur a disapointment man i'm about to unsub. very sad :(

[Colortiniz]

@justmy10cents Though the UN is far from perfect, I support the UN's mission. At the same time, I enjoy Ridley's perspective. Ridley isn't labeling himself as an advocate for UN flag-burning, but rather as an observer with a camera, showing what the mainstream media isn't. I think that's a good thing and will remain happily subscribed. Alternative points of view help me consider my own. And, as anyone who's visited Keene knows, its very pretty.

[p00lman]

No, Ridley clearly does advocate flag-burning, as can be evidenced from his previous video advertising the event.

[Colortiniz]

@p00lman Ah, I missed that. In any case, I like that Ridley takes the time to produce these videos (mostly not about the UN) and I'm glad to see you're paying attention :-)

[naturalrootlawn]

Poolman is an example of a freemason and why they are a direct threat to free states and society as a whole.

[p00lman]

Care to elaborate? Or do you only know how to spout meaningless labels and generalizations?

[p00lman]

Also, "the mainstream media" isn't covering this because "a group of 15 rednecks in the woods burn flags" isn't news.

[juliaisafilmbuff123]

@p00lman AGREED!

The FSP itself is a sad joke. They have what, 5% of their initial goal completed so far? What's funny is how the FSP uses the exact same scare tactics that the mainstream media uses: giving Americans the impression that the USA is being "sold out" to China (or Mexico) or that "the evil government/federal reserve" wants to steal all your money blah blah blah. Totally bogus.

[juliaisafilmbuff123]

The thing the FSP doesn't take into account are the powers BEHIND the government that are causing the gov to do bad things. Watch the documentary "The Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Politics" here on youtube to know where I'm getting at. The government is an institution that the people have the power to change, yet private corporations are not. So, if you try to maintain your freedom by eliminating the gov., and you sell it out to corps, you're protests will have NO power AT ALL.

[naturalrootlawn]

Let us all burn U.N. Flags every month until we multiply like flies congress and the world will understand that.

[naturalrootlawn]

Well I'm a black redneck then. America's place in the world will never be controlled from another country without a serious fight. If you don't like america get the hell out. Soon people like you be snuffed out and found out and you will be sent packing to your U.N. country of your choice.

[fczwartek]

"If you don't like America get the hell out."

The right-wing mantra. Love it or leave it, Baby! Uh-huh!

I was thinking of something more along the lines of "if you don't like America make it better."

But staying on topic, what exactly has the UN done to America that you would consider to be an example of "taking over"?

[naturalrootlawn]

The U.N. has tried to pressure America into agreements that would give the U.N. unprecented global powers. The U.N. tries to side step countries rule of law with a global law leveled against such nation. Martin Luther king warned about world policeman. I guess you didn't listen to his speech on the topic.

[p00lman]

The UN wants to end international conflict and achieve world peace, along with ending hunger and disease.

Your problem with this is . . . what, exactly?

[Fockersnextdoor]

They want Americans to pay for it and thats the problem.We don't owe the world shit

[p00lman]

That's where you're wrong.

Ever heard the line, "With great power comes great responsibility"?

[Verlch]

@p00lman

Ever head the line absolute power corrupts absolutely?

[juliaisafilmbuff123]

@Verlch Again, you are not looking at the real powers behind the government, namely the Fortune 500. The capitalist system allows businesses with lots of money to control the state and get politicians to be partial to their interests regardless of what the people want. Political parties in the USA are simply blocks of investors with a few conflicting areas of interest. If you're concerned about "power" corrupting, get rid of the capitalist system first.

[Verlch]

@juliaisafilmbuff123

That is why under a Republic, with only male voters, and with tariffs in place, not free trade, with empowered states rights as per the US constitution, with the State legislator choosing the US senator, not the voting public, or useful idiots as I call them, everything we be fine, if not better. And if congress coined the money and to set the value thereof, and we were supposed to have only gold and silver as money. We would be golden.

[p00lman]

Wow, that was all very terribly stupid.

But I'm specifically intrigued about why you think things would be better with "only male voters." Why do you have sexist ideals?

[Verlch]

@Verlch Should be only male voting land owners of 25 acres of developed land, or 50 acres of undevolped land. If we followed the US constitution we all would be a nation of We the Kings. Now udner a quasi socialist progressive democracy, it is back to tryanny. Of we the people on our bellies,the exact reason we left Europe.

At what point can the useful idiot, under socialism stop blaming the free markets for creating rich people that now use their money to unduly influence politicians?

[p00lman]

Yes, which has no application to this discussion. The US is a democracy of checks and balances.

[jdlaporte001]

The US ia a Republic actually not a Democracy.

I see you are still spewing false information and anti american sentiment with the comments I have seen here.

Most people take being a failure as something to work against, you on the other hand took the ball and ran into the hall of fame. Grats

[Verlch]

@jdlaporte001

How about we follow the US constitution and not some progressive dialectic?

[p00lman]

Hey, Jeffy! Grown any pubes yet?

The US is a democratic republic and always has been. Those terms aren't mutually exclusive.

My sentiment is anti-libertarian, actually, and you dumbfucks are no more American than I am.

[jdlaporte001]

No, definitely a Republic.

Considering you are in fact anti american, yes these people are more american than you are. You are not american at all. It might say it on your passport but thats simply a legal loophole for you. You are not american, you never have been and you never will be.

I saw you in one of the videos and the last thing you should be doing is making fun of someone's appearance / aged looks. ya....

[Verlch]

@jdlaporte001

Who was I making fun of? Do you have the link? I try very hard to treat people like I would want to be treated.

Ben Franklin called a democracy two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.

[jdlaporte001]

@verlch

none of my comments were addressed to you, the reply system on youtube leaves much to be desired. I suppose I should get in the habit of doing @name for my comments.

My comments were directed at poolman, he is an america hating left wing nut job.

[Verlch]

@jdlaporte001 Yeah mine does the @ every time unasked.

[p00lman]

Wow, I am "in fact" not American and "in fact" anti-American.

Where are those facts, Jeffy?

[naturalrootlawn]

Jesus sadi there would never be peace until his arrival. So all your trying to gain peace will be in vain.

[p00lman]

Oh god, not one of you evangelical nutbags.

Jesus would want you to try to improve your world. He didn't say, "Just sit there and do nothing until I get back."

[Verlch]

@p00lman

Oh no, not one of you faith based nothing created everything. who has family reunions at the zoo.

[p00lman]

Can you try making sense? What does that mean?

Are you vaguely saying you're one of those nutbags who takes everything in the bible literally and believes the Earth is 5000 years old?

[Verlch]

@p00lman

The bible says the earth was void and without form. Then God created life on it.

[p00lman]

That's nice.

Star Wars says, "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away . . . "

What's your point? How is your religion more valid than anyone else's?

And more importantly, since when does the fictitious writings in a book trump actual proven science?

[Verlch]

@p00lman

Hopefully the UN's peace is not ending all opposition to socialism.

[p00lman]

What are you talking about? What does socialism have to do with this discussion?

[Verlch]

@p00lman

I thin the Oligarchy is trying to set up global government for us named the NWO. It will be half capitalist and half communist like China. With a strong military and police force.

[p00lman]

And where exactly is your evidence for this paranoid theory?

[Verlch]

@p00lman

amerikanexpose . com/quotes1 . html

[Spazzfrom1989]

That it's simply bullshit lol

[p00lman]

"People like me"? What kind of people are those, ones who have a strong grasp of reality?

"Will be snuffed out," so is that a death threat?

No one is going to control the US, psycho.

[naturalrootlawn]

No it's no threat... I do strongly disagree with your U.N. can solve everything........

[p00lman]

I never said the UN can solve everything. I said what its goals are, however unattainable they may be.

Are those goals so wrong, though?

[fczwartek]

A bunch of "thumbs down" but not a single response. You guys really don't have a clue why you hate the UN do you? It's just a knee jerk reaction for you.

[txballoonman]

600+ wars since the UN was created to "stop wars." It's just there to justify whatever tyranny the US wants to impose on other countries. Sure, they make noise at the US for this and that, and they keep trying to be the world govt... but, if you care anything about the US Constitution, there is no authority in it for participation in the UN. What good thing does any government do well?

[fczwartek]

"there is no authority for participating in the UN" granted by the US constitution.

That is incorrect.

I recommend that you check out Article 6 of the US constitution. Specifically the part that talks about how international treaties that are ratified by the US government are the "supreme law of the land."

The UN charter was ratified by the US senate with a vote of 89-2.

Maybe you should try to read the constitution.

[naturalrootlawn]

10**********

[rataMacue22]

@p00lman

That's OK. Everyone's still wondering why you always make it a point to post your negative dribble on Ridley's videos.

[LumpyRevolution]

We care?

[hellsunicorn]

There's nothing to wonder about, p00lman and fczartek are lonely and want attention, which is usually the underlying psychological need to troll on the internet rather than actually discuss things.

If any body of government has an armed force of any kind, by definition it is anything but toothless. This alone should warrant ignoring these two morons, assuming that they aren't the same guy.

[p00lman]

There's nothing wrong with expressing disagreement and supporting that disagreement with reasons and facts, is there?

[hellsunicorn]

Show me the "reasons" and the "facts" and we can talk, as of now all I've seen are two loads of contrarian posts full of half-witted insults, which leads me to wonder whether you and what is likely a fake account (fczwartek) understand what "reasons" and "facts" actually are.

[p00lman]

Where are your "reasons and facts" to support your really stupid accusation that I have a fake account?

[fczwartek]

Yes I just am overwhelmed with desire for your attention. You figured me out.

It's funny that you consider people who express opposing opinions to your own to be "trolls." Anyone who disagrees with you must be compromised psychologically.

Save your dime store psychology and your soft censorship for someone else.

[p00lman]

The far right really doesn't want any sort of debate. You're either with them or you're a "troll."

[hellsunicorn]

When a jack-off like yourself says he supports arguments in one post, and then throws blanket ad hominems like "far right" and "rednecks" around, they exhibit the nature of a troll. Calling someone by their technical name is not an expression of ideology, but simply an exercise in common sense.

You thiningk a little too highly of yourself and your alleged status as a debater is also a bit off-putting, I'd work on that too.

[p00lman]

"Troll" is a technical name? That's new. Does that mean you can go to college and major in "troll"?

[hellsunicorn]

I would disagree, I haven't figured YOU out, because I can't be bothered with the biography of an insignificant troll, I've simply stated the general tendency of a person who comes on here tossing words like "paranoid", "redneck" and "right-winger" and then cries "soft-censorship" when someone doesn't play into his insignificant little games.

And yes, someone who goes dropping insults like the kinds I mentioned and then claims to be debating rationally is psychologically compromised, or stupid.

[fczwartek]

Oh, Boo-hoo someone insulted you on the internet. Cry into your pillow about it cuz you're not going to get any sympathy from me.

I'm going to go ahead and throw in a few more pejoratives like- thug republican twat douche bag.

Good day!

[p00lman]

I'm still waiting to hear the explanation of why these idiots feel so threatened by the UN. Do they really believe the UN is the beginning of a "world government" that will further limit people's freedoms? That's ridiculous.

Clever rhyming, though.

[fczwartek]

I can't figure it out either. I suspect they hate the UN cause they heard somewhere that it was planning on taking over the WORLD!!!!

That's right. The UN with its 2 billion dollar a year budget is on the verge of becoming our overlord.

Forget the fact that the miniscule state of New Hampshire has a yearly budget more than twice that of the UN. Ignore that!

The John Birch Society told them the UN would take over. 60 years ago.

[p00lman]

They're still working on it, though! The UN could take over at ANY MOMENT. They're just waiting to mobilize the mole men, who will burrow under every city in the world, and then suddenly come up and take over.

[SSILENTNATION]

"Everyone's wondering why P00lman......" I can see it now - a huge protest in downtown Keene...all 10 of ya with signs about wondering why p00lman doesn't agree with you.

[Spazzfrom1989]

oh for fucks sakes, are you really that gullible? It's a group of people with a monopoly of power, of course they are gonna do things that will further it. LOOK AT HOW THEY MADE UP GLOBAL WARMING!! To gain more power.

[p00lman]

Yeah, all those African nations are really benefitting from all that power.

That's the funniest thing I've ever heard.

[Spazzfrom1989]

Wow really? Of course they are not benefiting! They get the shit end of the deal, they have to go along for the ride. Im talking about the main players. US, UK, Luxembourgh all those power nations where the money is. Look at how they omitted certain science research on climate change and now those African nations are forced into their globalist plans. Just lookin into Carbon Credits being traded among big business

[p00lman]

So what you're saying is that the powerful members of the UN . . . are powerful. Wow, that's . . . I'd never considered that before. That's amazing.

So tell me, which "certain science research" on climate change was "omitted"? How come you know all about this secret research that the other UN members don't? You really should share it with everyone.

[hellsunicorn]

It was on national T.V. just recently, Jesse Ventura and a team of media interviewed people associated with Morris Strong (the Canadian oil tycoon caught up in the Oil for Food scandal, who also founded the modern green movement in the 1970s). Not to mention that the emails that were hacked (personally I think they were leaked by someone at East Anglia Univ.) cover this.

Do less time denying and spend more time reading or following "real" news, you'll thank me later.

[p00lman]

Sorry, bucky, but those emails weren't about any change in data or statistics.

You should pay closer attention.

[hellsunicorn]

Spoken as someone who has not read them, it's pretty clear I'm wasting my time with you.

[p00lman]

The controversy was about people trying to change the language of the debate, not the statistics. Forgot that part, didn't you?