Added: 3 years ago
From: heathr456
Views: 6,162
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (84)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Sarah Palin should start her own party (the "Inbred Uneducated Hick" party)

  • Why are you asking him his opinion? He is dumb as hell, his opinion is worthless. Please report on something that is important, instead of this lying piece of shit, who still has the taste of Bush's and Cheney cock in his mouthh.

  • @xinecallaw at least he stepped down after the first term when he saw where those 2 were headed. hes smart, and im not a conservative

  • SMALL TOWN, LARGE TOWN,

    SEE MATTHEW BEDNARSKI AT 6301 58TH ST N, NOONE LIKES A CHILD MOLESTOR AND LIEING MILITARY OVER 9-11-01 AND THE BIBLE!!!

  • Colin Powell should replace Michael Steele. 

  • Like the guy, but what about his support for disciminatory hiring policies AKA "affirmative action?"

  • Affirmative Action isn't mandatory, it's a voluntary choice on the part of employers.

  • I could see Colin Powell as president, he appeals to logic and reason. The problem is I can't really see him trying to become president.

  • Unfortunately the GOP base doesn't appreciate smart, honorable men like Mccain and Powell. They want caricatures like Bush, the faux-cowboy, and Palin, the ditsy cheerleader. That's why they passed over McCain in 2000 and that's why McCain picked Palin in 2008: the only people conservatives get excited about are hopeless lightweights.

  • Sarah Palin 2012

  • Comment removed

  • What do you like about being white?

  • what the hell kind of a question is that? As if he has a choice what race he is? Why is it that "minorities" have been screwed by the man and had no choice what race they are but white people are born racist and decided what race they were going to be?

    It sucks being white when you try to do any of these things as special preference is given to every race but white.

    get a loan

    go to college

    start a business

    get a job

    get a home

  • Does Powell realize he's saying Republicans should compromize their principles in order to get more votes? Good thing he wasn't a political advisor to the one man he owes his career to: Ronald Reagan. He didn't compromised his conservative principles and he came a few thousand votes from historically sweeping a Presidential election. Funny, Democrats didn't compromise (nominating the most liberal senator) and they won!!! Isn't interesting how Powell's opinion is all of a sudden important?

  • I never understood the minority majority bs... isn't that just a way of saying not white majority? right? I mean everything is a race except european decent.

  • I tink it refers to the number of seats the dem or repub's have the smaller is the minority.

  • no, hes talking about population as it relates to race... he said "the majority will be the minority" just a liberal way of saying not white. Also its a way to blame republicans and the white people for everything even after the "minority population" out numbers them and no longer has controll of any branch of government.

  • I think Powell is attempting to clean his bush tarnished image. He really should have resigned rather than lie to the U.N.. That being said, I think he is right about Palin and the bush brand republicon party.

  • Palin was polarizing, but I think the Iraq War was much more polarizing than her!

    "This is bullshit!" were Powell's words about the "evidence" of Iraq's WMD, but he still gave the speech to the UN, with Picaso's Guernica coveniently covered need I remind anyone! (which shouldn't be surprising since he was also involved in the My Lai massacre coverup!)

    I'm not from NY, but I hesitate to think that those are a reflection of the "South Bronx values" he grew up with!

  • Powell did not make this up on his own...

    Bush ordered him to do it... Bush tarnished his legacy..

  • Oh, so you mean he was "just taking orders?"

    Is it possible that he could not have done otherwise, like simply refuse to give his speech or resign instead of lie?

    But I realize that integrity isn't something that politicians are known for, but if enough of them keep getting burnt like Mr. Powell, maybe one day that'll change.

  • Correction: "Is it possible that he could have done otherwise,..."

  • If, at that time, he was a world citizen first and an American citizen second he would have resigned rather than make the U.N. speech. He held his integrity as a good national soldier and lost it as a good world custodian. Most people would have made the same decision, unfortunately. While nationalism has some upsides, this is one of its downsides.

  • Hopefully it will stop...

  • Bush spent a large amount of his youth in Texas and just look at his values: torture, unnecessary war to enrich the military industrial complex, giving tax cuts to the richest. Sarah should not prefer one part of the USA to another. Division is their method.

  • Division is just fine with you liberals when it suits your purposes.

    During the Clinton 90's, liberals divided America into two groups: "the people" and "those right-wing militia fanatics!".

    And they were ALL TOO EAGER to exploit THOSE divisions to suit their purposes.

    And you say that division is the REPUBLICAN'S method?

    Spare me.

  • The comments on this video show why the republican party is dying. When one of their own speaks out and says that they need to change some things, they attack him.

    Go through life with blinders on all you want.  I don't care that your party is dying but Powell is one of the last respectable members of your party and you'd be wise to listen to him.

  • Why the hell SHOULD we listen to him?

    He's not really a Republican.

    He's a liberal in disguise.

    THAT is why we are "attacking" him.

  • If you don't realize that the Republican party is dying out because of it's hard line stances and blatant bigotry you're either in denial or just blind.

    Please explain to the class what exactly makes Powell a "liberal in disguise". What views does he hold that are not socially conservative?

  • Read my comment of about 11 hours ago. I don't like repeating myself.

  • Your statement is nothing but empty accusations. When did Powell ever say he endorsed any of the things you claim he has?

    Post a source. A link. Anything.

  • If you don't know, then you are the one who should be paying attention to what "your hero" believes.

  • As I have said before, Powell is a well known individual and you must be bashing him because he is not going around supporting McCain/Palin or any other disgraceful group of republicans agendas, views, and/or policies on how to handle issues in this country and/or the world and those who want to combine religion into politics. Powell is right, this type of the Rep. party did not come around until Bush got into office and it is tearing this country apart...

    Why don't you just listen

  • Listen...to a liberal Republican?

    Why?

    There can be no more worthless creature on the planet!

    At least we KNOW where Democrats stand. A liberal Republican is a false flagger, someone taking the place of a conservative, albeit REAL Republican.

    As I said, if Colin Powell wants to be a liberal, let him join the DEMOCRATS!

    They welcome people like him with open arms.

  • You're entirely correct, dodger, Democrats will gladly welcome all rational Republicans to switch parties, with one proviso...they have to begin using their rationality towards the benefit of the entire population as opposed to just the wealthy elite. So, yes, someone like Powell would be welcomed with open arms. Those intelligent Republicans who are greedy can remain in the GOP as leaders of the base of ignorant rednecks and evangelists. All liberal Republicans will be welcomed!

  • That is precisely what I was talking about: dividing people.

    Painting the base of the Republican Party as "ignorant rednecks and evangelists" is EXACTLY what I was talking about.

    And if liberals WANT to leave the Republican Party, they can do so. Fine by me. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Now we know where you stand without any pretense whatsoever. And we can stand as a TRULY united party.

  • You're a liberal republican... I did not know that they exist...

    So what do you think about Palin?

  • I was talking about Colin Powell.

    The fact I was talking about him should have been obvious.

    Grow some common sense.

    And I believe that Sarah Palin is a better conservative and a better Republican than Colin Powell could EVER be on his best day!

  • According to your statement, you don't have any common sense... especially is you believe that Palin (of all people) is better than Powell...

    That right there is not common sense that's foolishness, You need to grow some common sense.

    What experience can Palin can bring to the table against Powell?

  • Wrong, as always.

    According to YOUR OPINION, I lack common sense and need to grow some.

    What? Are you going to just repeat MY statements?

    WOW! Repeat people, much?

    You obviously didn't pay attention to my statement. I said that Sarah Palin was a better conservative and a better Republican, NOT that she was a better person.

    Pay attention when people talk.

    Your failure to do so is a sure sign of a lack of maturity on YOUR part. But then again, you ARE a liberal, so I can EXPECT that.

  • Why wont you answer the question...

    You explained that Palin was a BETTER CONSERVATIVE and a REPUBLICAN than Powell EVER WILL BE... I am telling you to prove it, at which you have failed...AGAIN, just like the conservative BIMBO her and yourself.

    You out-of-touch retards are something else...

    One person asks you a question and you try to dodge it and talk about something else that does not have ANYTHING to do with the question.

    You must be retarded individual...

  • I answered your question several hours ago. Read my past comments.

    Or better yet, try cutting back on the attitude on YOUR part and grow some maturity.

    Typical liberal response.

    The facts fail you, insult your opponent. Call them "retarded" or "out-of-touch".

    If that's all you're going to do, then you need to grow up.

  • OH! and BTW...

    "...I am telling you to prove it"

    You don't TELL me anything! You ASK!

    Learn some MANNERS along with the common sense and the maturity that you and the rest of the Obama/Powell supporters so obviously need!

  • You are so lost...

    You keep bringing up this common sense method and you are still not following it... like a retard.

    Like asking a LIAR...

    not going to waste any time with your retarded ass.

    You need drugs.

    BTW Voting for someone like Palin is Not Commonsense either, just plain stupidity.

  • Fine by me.

    Now run away.

    Like a whipped dog.

    Or an immature child who got a well-deserved spanking.

    All you had was a bunch of middle-school insults.

    Seriously, how old are you, TWELVE?

    So typical. So textbook.

    It sickens me you have the same vote that I DO.

    They should take away your right to vote like they would take the keys to the family car.

    Because you lack the maturity to use it.

  • BTW, it is spelled common sense, NOt "Commonsense".

    It is two words, and it is not capitalized.

    See?

    I even have to CORRECT YOUR SPELLING like an immature child.

    You already ACT like one.

  • You called that an answer, I called it an excuse to dodge it,

    Talking about growing some maturity; unfortunately, you do not have it. If you cannot answer a simple question.

    What attitude are you talking about,

    "The facts fail you, insult your opponent. Call them "retarded" or "out-of-touch"."

    What facts, I have been asking you about the facts since Sunday afternoon, about what competitiveness that Palin would have that would make her more CONSERVATIVE/REPUBLICAN than Powell.

  • I was talking about the attitude you are giving me right now. Only you are obviously too immature to see it.

    And like I already said, I already ANSWERED your question. If you lack the intelligence and the MATURITY that I was commenting that YOU NEED to find it in the twenty-plus comments I left, then that is YOUR problem!

    Run along now, SEALBOY!

    I'm done OWNING YOUR STUPID LIBERAL ASS!

  • You CHOSE to "waste your time" with me.

    That is YOUR problem.

    Remember that.

  • Amen to that...

    I agree

  • There is already a party that supports cutting and running in Iraq and Afghanistan, gun control, higher taxes, abortion on demand, socialism in education and health care, and they all supported Barack Obama for President.

    They're called the DEMOCRATS!

    If Colin Powell supports all those things, he should just stop wearing a false uniform and go join the other side.

    Because he acts like a Democrat already, so he should just BECOME ONE and stop the nonsense!

  • What do you mean, "socialism in education", dodger? If you mean "public schools", I believe Reps support those as well. And let me ask you this, if there were no Americans in Iraq right now, would you vote in favor of sending troops over there and, if so, for what reason?

  • When I said "socialism in education", I meant government control to the point of monopoly and teaching of anti-conservative/Republican/C­hristian propaganda disguised as history.

    Which is happening.

    And President Bush was justified in going in to Iraq for the reasons he stated: Iraq WAS pursuing WMD's and we did not know the status of his development of them. And when dealing with a group of people who believe they are justified in lying to non-Muslims to gain an advantage over them, well..

  • The reason I asked you the question of whether or not you would send U.S. troops to Iraq right now was related to your comment about "cutting and running." If it wouldn't make sense to send troops over under the current scenario, then it makes equal sense to remove them as quickly as possible. It's basically a Shia vs. Sunni conflict with a Kurdish independence movement sideshow. That conflict will be continuing for generations to come. It's time to let the Arabs/Persians/Kurds sort this out.

  • As a democrat, I absolutely love Sarah Palin. She is going to help my party more than any democrat ever could.

  • I wouldn't use such crass language, but I agree with the basic point: that Sarah Palin is a much better Republican and conservative than Colin Powell has EVER been.

    The only difference between Colin Powell & a liberal Democrat is that Colin Powell is a Republican.

    END!

    OF!

    LIST!

    Seriously, why in the blue HELL do Republicans even LISTEN to Colin Powell?

    The only reason why he's a Republican AT ALL is because the most effective way to DESTROY the Republican Party is from WITHIN!

  • Not only that, but Sarah Palin is also a google times the MAN and PERSON than Powell could ever be. Powell is TRULY INFERIOR, WORTHLESS and PATHETIC, PLUS he has a HAIRY PUSSY. Palin is the ULTIMATE and SUPREME BEING in this world for she is GOD's CHOSEN ONE, GOD INCARNATE and the LIVING EMBODIMENT OF GOD HERSELF!

  • You are so FULL OF SHIT... Do us all a favor don't have kids, because the US needs to get rid weird imbreds... just like yourself.

  • You are the one that is FULL OF SHIT!

  • No, You are a fucking idiot... because you can't e serious... Palin is a RETARD, Plain and simple...

    Powell was a 4 star General (and chairman of the joint chiefs)

    Powell have foreign relations experience,

    Powell have military handling experience

    Powell is one of the last dependable Republicans that the party have left...

    and there's more...

    Palin is noting but a retarded Barbie that is drunk on Jesus juice...

    You ass clowns are fucking retarded

    This party is tearing apart.

  • The crass language you use demonstrates how LOW CLASS the detractors of Sarah Palin REALLY ARE!

    You say that stuff about Sarah Palin as a a substitute for a REAL ARGUMENT!

    Typical liberal response.

  • ...What?

  • I believe I made myself quite clear.

  • No, you sound confused

  • You say that I "sound confused" so you can discount my statements.

    Nice try.

    Well, no, not really.

    If you want me to repeat myself, tough.

    I made myself clear the first time I said it.

  • actually, i am talking about the recent statement...

    Sound like you are way out there... you need to stop watching Fox News

  • What does my choice of news have to do with this?

    You say I watch Fox News like it's a slur!

    So what?

    YOU are the one not making any sense.

  • The only Republican that makes sense...

  • Secretary Powell was trying, in diplomatic language, to say that Sarah Palin represents the worst of the Republican Party, that she is a bigotted redneck who, while rallying this base of the party, acted as a polarizing force who alienated most of the reasonable and intelligent people within the GOP. It is hard to imagine how the intelligent Republicans could ever again rationalize joining together with the base that Palin brings to the party. There may have to be two conservative parties.

  • well said.

    believe it or not, there was a time back in the 80s when suburban, middle-class, rational Republicans coexisted with the base. but they didn't this time because the problems are different, more nuanced and complex. and it looks like Palin didn't get the memo that things have changed since then.

    -signed

    a Republican for Obama

  • @1140Cecile He wasn't Secretary of Stat in this interview, lol, that was years ago when he retired from the Bush Admin. This interview is in 2008

  • YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD Mr. Powell

  • Because of Bush... Bush ordered him to do it as much as Bush told Gen. Patreas to tell the media that the surge was working in Iraq...

    That is one of the reason that he resigned from the Bush Administration.

    Bush tarnished Powell's credentials

  • Right on, Sec Powell, but that would define a R party that wants to contribute to the debate. All I see is obstruction and non productive actions. From 2006 to 2008, Rs filibustered 95 times in the Senate. That shatters the previous record and this from the party that always said let's have an up or down vote from 2000 to 2006. You can't have it both ways.

  • Whatever, Powell, you need to take a harder look at the GOP, Palin IS their future. Dividing this country into US vs THEM is what they've always been about. Just because they said they would vote for you as POTUS, doesn't mean jack shit. Some of my best friends are.......!

    Do you really think Bobby Jindal appeals to most conservatives? Puhleez!

  • Why? Because he's Indian? You're part of the problem!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more