Added: 5 years ago
From: SweetLandOfLiberty
Views: 37,744
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • God dam..bird got it up the ass hard

  • thats got 2 be 1 of the most powerful a.t missile

  • @hotrod4you2 say over kill

  • fuck it, everybody google world war two proximity fused artillery. its nothing new, the tech is very old

  • MINDFUCK!!...i understand shaped chages, but its not even touching the tank....thats nuckin futs

  • It looks like there was a secondary explosion that came from inside the tank.

    Does anyone know if there was explosive inside the tank or not?

  • @karozans The target tank was full of ammo and fuel.

  • @Azyashi Ah. Thanks.

  • ppitm is right. at least the old t-54 and even the 62's didnt automatically get their turret blown off when they were hit. they are usually salvagable when knocked out, but a 72 up? forget it. everyone dies and the tank dies also. the ruskies don't make tough tanks like they used to. never see a t-72 that has been hit and still has its turret.

  • @nomadnametab Russians makes good tanks,NATO just makes better weapons. :)

    Sweed's are fine example also they make all there Missile able to take ut any Russian made tank.

  • @Dogmeat1950

    Sweed's have nothing like Russian last generation man-portable weapon (both AT and SAM).

    Our systems like AT-14 Spriggan or SA-18 Grouse is much better any Saab Bofors Dynamics production specimens.

    It takes a few seconds + Google for make sure that.

  • @MURSIXX SAM we are talking anti-tank. not SAM's, talking about anti-tank missiles and rockets Sweden has always made top of the line anti-tank systems that's why the USA buys into them.

  • @Dogmeat1950

    They have a "top line" among NATO's producers a possible, but You should not be too sure.

    The Israelis had thought that they have the "very" protected tanks. And what?

    See it: watch?v=RzVEduKGUws&feature=re­lated

    Or search "Merkava v Kornet E ATGM " on this site.

  • @MURSIXX Israel is not part of NATO, any tank can be killed or knocked out. the USA has lost some Abrams. but there crews always lived not 1 man has died while in a Abrams.

    Speaking of Israel they used Sherman tanks to kill T-55's so...ya.... lol.

    no tank is perfect, but a tank that can keep it's crew alive to fight another day is a good tank.

  • @Dogmeat1950

    Ya, ya Sherman is best tank!

    But the Tankmen of Panzerwaffe did not know it. They shot down a lot more Shermans than were killed by them. One Tiger (Michael Wittmann's PzKpfw. VI) has destroyed a whole division. ))

  • @MURSIXX what!? don't put words in my mouth,

    I never said the Sherman was the best tank. I was pointing out that, the Sherman tank was still able with some upgrades to stop a much newer tanks during the 6 day war of 1968, again i'm pointing out that no tank is perfect.

    Also you need to learn history, Michael Wittmann never Commander a PzKpfw. VI) aka Panzer 4 he commanded a TIGER TANK a PzKpfw VI.

    Do NOT change the subject again, I never said "the Sherman is best tank!" it wasn't.

  • @Dogmeat1950

    Ok! :))

    I like history. I'll learn it better.

  • Looks like the explosion comes from the tank and not the missile.

  • fucking hell i thought that was a bird or something hovering about until it exploded i nearly jumped out of my skin : 0

  • 0352 Slayin' Tanks bitch

  • This is how the TOW 2 works it sends a charge down into the tank and blows it up. I just spent the last 5 years working on this system. I have fixed and used this system the new system is called a SABER missile system.

  • this is real i shot ones befor years,its not  tow2 i think its tow 5,,,

  • omg check out the bird xDD

    P000WNED

  • That was not a bird. That was the missile itself. Didn't you notice it's in slow motion? Check out the heat waves coming off the back of it. =P

  • Well that was the most explosive Seagull ever.

  • Fuel + ammo+explosive force = Boom

  • Its not filled with explosives, but probably does have tank ammunition inside it. That would be realistic in a combat situation

  • The tank is partialy dissassemled, parts are unscrewed in oder to make with kind of impressive vid.. The tank is also pretty old...which construction is about 40 or 50 years old

  • @soyouz T-72s at least always blow their turrets off like that.

  • @ppitm

    I wouldn't say always, but it's very common for them to exhibit the Jack-In-The-Box effect due to how the turret is designed to attach to the chassis.

  • Doesn't even amaze me anymore.. Just waiting for the day we blow ourselves the fuck up...

  • ok, this is silly. the tank was packed with explosives for a nice showdown. the missile's shaped charge is the first explosion, the second blast is bullshit.

  • Your an idiot the TOW2b has two shaped charges that point downward so they penetrate the top of the tank. The missile automatically aims about 10ft above where the gunner aims and has a magnetic sensor that knows when to blow up its freakin magic dude dont call bs on something you know nothing about.

  • How do they keep the shaped charge pointed down, and how does the missle/operater know the exact moment to blow up?

  • This is what happens when the round fired penetrates the tank and hits the ammo(kaboom!!!)

  • Apparently most of you never heard of operation DESERT STORM!! the enemy tanks were completely destroyed like on this video by the Allied Forces,Great Britain,and America vs the Iraqi Republican Guard,besides the Iraqis ditching some of their vehicles we destroyed the rest(T55,T72,and the T80),it's a good thing their tanks were junk,only made the job easier.lol

  • "...and the T80"

    No.

  • No doubt the TOW can deal with a old T-62, but this is made up to impress the public..

    I dunno what is blowing up (i suppose its ~10kg of RDX+fuel), but its definitely not tank ammo.. search some combat vids to see how tank ammo blows, looks completely different

  • yes you're right about that it does not explode like that

  • yep. its filled with xplosives.

    there is no friggin way they would have

    that kind of secondary warhead aither.

  • This is fake!

    Whay the hell did the tank explode?!

    Ammo?! NO WAY! This is testing not combat. who would place ammo for thousands of dollars in a tank youre going to shoot at?

    1) this is too expensive

    2) in testing to blow a tank up is not reasonable, due to cant see the effect of the missile (experts need to see all details)

    3) tanks are usually used several times, repaired and used again to save money

    4) the resulted explosion could harm people

    5) ammo aint blowing like that

  • To explain it as simple as possible te TOW 2Be was designed to explode over the weakest point of a tank. aim shoot track turret destroy.

  • Holy shit! Blew the turret 50 feet up in the air!

  • it's the ammo going boom

  • yeah this does look like the explosions from beneath or inside the tank but im no expert.

  • fake!

    there are two explosions, at first the tow missle, then i think, an explosion from the inside of the tank. when you look you see the burning from inside!

  • thats retarded.

    ammo and fuel tends to detonate when hit with a anything, including the heat jet from an tow atgm.

  • THis is NOT fake!! A TOW IIb has 2 cone shaped charges facing down...when it is over the tank it deonates...forcing the hot plasma gases into the top of the tank..where there is no reactive armor...into the tank...expoding the fuel and munitions inside..and the Russians or Arabs in the tank too..LOL

  • bet you've never shot one of those!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more