Let me make this clear as a Deist: The Book of Revelation is correct in describing the destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D. .....but wrong in the Pauline doctrine of Jesus return and rapture. Jesus is not the Creator....he is a jewish man who has been falsely worshipped as the Creator. Let me add: There is a Creator I am just believing in the 50% probability versus the other probability of Atheism(the other 50% probability). Deism is based on causality(cause & effect) of the universes.
All of prophecy has been fufilled!! Not part or most. See matt. 5:17,18 AThe law will not pass until all of it has been fufulled. That includes the judgment, esurrection, and the 2nd coming! That falls as a part of the law and the prophets
"Write ye this man childless, a man [that] shall not prosper in his days...30. "For no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.
Jesus could never be king/priest on the earth. He was a descendant of Jeconiah. Jesus couldnt be a priest on earth either because he was of the tribe of Judah....Only Levites could be priests on earth. The earthly temple was a shadow of the true heavenly temple in heaven. Christ is ruling and reigning from Heaven
@Danielezerable this comment was so fuckin stupid it took 2 month for somebody to reply.i hope you keep that in mind including nobody in preterism ever mentions an hour
And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
@LifeIsABigPuzzle: If this has not happened yet, how is the high priest Ciaphas going to see this? But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God. Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
So who is THE false prophet of the book of Revelation?
Rev 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and THE FALSE PROPHET [are], and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
James 5:8 - You, too, must be patient. Take courage, for the coming of the Lord is near. (Written nearly 2,000 years ago... I guess James was a false prophet and we can disregard his book.... if we are in the "last days" still)
@LoveJesusNotReligion Problem wasn't with the Second Coming, but with the Rambo movie that Dispensational Premillenialists have turned it into. There were many comings of God in the Old Testament with the same descriptions the New Testament gives of the return of Christ in His High Priestly Ministry to judge Israel. You can't find the Dispensational Zoarastrianism in the New Testament about this Rambo Second Coming that turns the Second Coming into this UFO invasion of the body snatchers movie!
Scripture also CLEARLY states that after Jesus reigns for 1000 years that he will deliver the kingdom to God. If he is sitting at the right hand of God, and ruling now.. then why the need to deliver the kingdom to the father if He is already there? I appriciate some of your views, but seriously.. how can you get so off on some things that are so plainly obvious? you change the meaning of scriptures to fit what you think. That is not good.
You are confusing I Corinthains 15 with Revelation 20. Nowhere in he Bible does it state that after he rules for a 1000yrs will he deliver up the kingdom to the father. It only says that he will deliver up the kingdom in I Corinthians 15, and in that chapter it mentions no 1000yr reign.
This is a wrong view. Even reading the scripture here you read right over what it says. Jesus is sitting at the right hand of the father UNTIL He makes His enemies His footstool. THEN he will sit upon the throne. Right now he is the Christ, the high priest of the new covenant and at a point in the future He will Go from sitting at Gods right hand to SItting on the Throne.
@TheHellbinder If He's not King of Jerusalem NOW, then His Blood does us zero good, because He's not High Priest after the order of Melchizedek. You can't divide the offices of Christ that are joined from the book of Genesis onwards with this gap theory that the Bible nowhere imposes. He is King and High Priest, right now, after the order of Melchizedek. Get rid of your gap theories or find the Scripture that genuinely states them without it being read into it, selectively with a cookie cutter
@TheHellbinder: Bible says: Knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him (David), that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would RAISE UP Christ to sit on HIS (David's) throne; He seeing this before spake OF THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST, This Jesus HATH GOD RAISED UP, whereof we all are witnesses.Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, WHICH YE NOW SEE AND HEAR.
To avoid the notion of supercessionism, dispensationalists have suggested that there are two covenants in operation simultaneously. There are very serious problems with this view. The duel covenant view would have to renounce the claims of the NT authors about the true people of God being both Jew and Gentile united in Christ. Paul in his letter to the Romans makes very clear that the corporate body of believers is constituted by both Jew and Gentile who stand in faith.
Good video. Nearly all the early Christians were Jews but some like people in Asia Minor and Samaria were also descendants of lost tribes at least in part, so it seems that virtually all early Christians were of Israel by descent. Even though it is not race or genetics that determines who is part of the true Israel (but belief in Christ) it is still important to some to know that the old people were not thrown away. Interestingly Old Covenant Israel sometimes grafted in people, lost others.
@elavaney If we're agreed upon the Gospel being Jesus Christ, then in the 60s AD of the 1st Century, Revelation 1 says He was going after those that crucified Him, & we have in Revelation a NT version of Exodus w/judgments being upon the default gods of Israel since they'd rejected Him. Figurative thousand years begins after 70AD, then the little season of Satan w/the Bar Kokhba rebellion, then last two chapters of Revelation are Genesis chapters 1 & 2 of Church's Reign w/gospel still going out.
Let me make this clear as a Deist: The Book of Revelation is correct in describing the destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D. .....but wrong in the Pauline doctrine of Jesus return and rapture. Jesus is not the Creator....he is a jewish man who has been falsely worshipped as the Creator. Let me add: There is a Creator I am just believing in the 50% probability versus the other probability of Atheism(the other 50% probability). Deism is based on causality(cause & effect) of the universes.
cris750 1 week ago
All of prophecy has been fufilled!! Not part or most. See matt. 5:17,18 AThe law will not pass until all of it has been fufulled. That includes the judgment, esurrection, and the 2nd coming! That falls as a part of the law and the prophets
alsteww 2 months ago
2 Corinthians 1:20
For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.
Galatians 3:16
Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
alexander76rw 5 months ago
"Write ye this man childless, a man [that] shall not prosper in his days...30. "For no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.
Jesus could never be king/priest on the earth. He was a descendant of Jeconiah. Jesus couldnt be a priest on earth either because he was of the tribe of Judah....Only Levites could be priests on earth. The earthly temple was a shadow of the true heavenly temple in heaven. Christ is ruling and reigning from Heaven
alexander76rw 5 months ago
Comment removed
alexander76rw 5 months ago
LOL! Matthew 24:36 and Mark 13:32 BOTH disprove Preterism. Only the Father knows the hour and Preterists claim to know the hour! BLASPHEMY!
Danielezerable 7 months ago
@Danielezerable this comment was so fuckin stupid it took 2 month for somebody to reply.i hope you keep that in mind including nobody in preterism ever mentions an hour
gigabite7 5 months ago
Matthew 24:30 (Whole Chapter)
And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
I don't think that this has happened yet.
LifeIsABigPuzzle 9 months ago
@LifeIsABigPuzzle jesus himself said that he would return in this generation to his followers.did he lie?the son of god?
gigabite7 5 months ago
@LifeIsABigPuzzle: If this has not happened yet, how is the high priest Ciaphas going to see this? But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God. Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
raydawgrules 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So who is THE false prophet of the book of Revelation?
Rev 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and THE FALSE PROPHET [are], and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
PeteWaldo 1 year ago
@PeteWaldo Obama lol
pacstain 11 months ago
James 5:8 - You, too, must be patient. Take courage, for the coming of the Lord is near. (Written nearly 2,000 years ago... I guess James was a false prophet and we can disregard his book.... if we are in the "last days" still)
Keep up the good work Gary
LoveJesusNotReligion 1 year ago
@LoveJesusNotReligion Problem wasn't with the Second Coming, but with the Rambo movie that Dispensational Premillenialists have turned it into. There were many comings of God in the Old Testament with the same descriptions the New Testament gives of the return of Christ in His High Priestly Ministry to judge Israel. You can't find the Dispensational Zoarastrianism in the New Testament about this Rambo Second Coming that turns the Second Coming into this UFO invasion of the body snatchers movie!
fgmPostApocalypticTV 10 months ago
Scripture also CLEARLY states that after Jesus reigns for 1000 years that he will deliver the kingdom to God. If he is sitting at the right hand of God, and ruling now.. then why the need to deliver the kingdom to the father if He is already there? I appriciate some of your views, but seriously.. how can you get so off on some things that are so plainly obvious? you change the meaning of scriptures to fit what you think. That is not good.
TheHellbinder 1 year ago
@TheHellbinder
You are confusing I Corinthains 15 with Revelation 20. Nowhere in he Bible does it state that after he rules for a 1000yrs will he deliver up the kingdom to the father. It only says that he will deliver up the kingdom in I Corinthians 15, and in that chapter it mentions no 1000yr reign.
raydawgrules 2 months ago
This is a wrong view. Even reading the scripture here you read right over what it says. Jesus is sitting at the right hand of the father UNTIL He makes His enemies His footstool. THEN he will sit upon the throne. Right now he is the Christ, the high priest of the new covenant and at a point in the future He will Go from sitting at Gods right hand to SItting on the Throne.
TheHellbinder 1 year ago
@TheHellbinder If He's not King of Jerusalem NOW, then His Blood does us zero good, because He's not High Priest after the order of Melchizedek. You can't divide the offices of Christ that are joined from the book of Genesis onwards with this gap theory that the Bible nowhere imposes. He is King and High Priest, right now, after the order of Melchizedek. Get rid of your gap theories or find the Scripture that genuinely states them without it being read into it, selectively with a cookie cutter
fgmPostApocalypticTV 10 months ago
@TheHellbinder: Bible says: Knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him (David), that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would RAISE UP Christ to sit on HIS (David's) throne; He seeing this before spake OF THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST, This Jesus HATH GOD RAISED UP, whereof we all are witnesses.Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, WHICH YE NOW SEE AND HEAR.
raydawgrules 2 months ago
To avoid the notion of supercessionism, dispensationalists have suggested that there are two covenants in operation simultaneously. There are very serious problems with this view. The duel covenant view would have to renounce the claims of the NT authors about the true people of God being both Jew and Gentile united in Christ. Paul in his letter to the Romans makes very clear that the corporate body of believers is constituted by both Jew and Gentile who stand in faith.
astronomer747 1 year ago
Comment removed
astronomer747 1 year ago
Good video. Nearly all the early Christians were Jews but some like people in Asia Minor and Samaria were also descendants of lost tribes at least in part, so it seems that virtually all early Christians were of Israel by descent. Even though it is not race or genetics that determines who is part of the true Israel (but belief in Christ) it is still important to some to know that the old people were not thrown away. Interestingly Old Covenant Israel sometimes grafted in people, lost others.
DrStevenz 1 year ago
Can you please explain Paul's comments about the Jews being grafted back in after the gospel has gone to the Gentile?
elavaney 1 year ago
@elavaney If we're agreed upon the Gospel being Jesus Christ, then in the 60s AD of the 1st Century, Revelation 1 says He was going after those that crucified Him, & we have in Revelation a NT version of Exodus w/judgments being upon the default gods of Israel since they'd rejected Him. Figurative thousand years begins after 70AD, then the little season of Satan w/the Bar Kokhba rebellion, then last two chapters of Revelation are Genesis chapters 1 & 2 of Church's Reign w/gospel still going out.
fgmPostApocalypticTV 10 months ago
@fgmPostApocalypticTV Could you elaborate on the last sentence of this reply? In particular, your reference to Genesis 1 and 2
bengphoenix 5 months ago