@cnestudy1 defraction? That's not a word. Perhaps you mean diffraction?
But even if you do mean diffraction, you're still wrong. Diffraction is what happens to waves as they pass around an obstacle. Mirrors don't diffract, they reflect.
And to answer your final question, this guy is Richard Feynman, and he's right and you were wrong! =)
Basically, Feynman is saying reflection is different to rotation, but when we first see a mirror we think the image has been rotated though the image it is in fact reflected.
"We don't think of the idea that the person has been pushed and squashed backwards-forwards, because that's not what ordinarily happens to people." Pfft, this guy's never been to Detroit, obviously.
If someone asked me that question, I would think they were a retard and I would away....clearly I'd be at the wrong college. That is not a trick question...at all.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I don't doubt that Feynman was a genius but the average person can understand that mirrors invert right and left. Hell even pigs and cats understand this concept.
@designflaw01 you obviously did not finish the video... It is obvious that the mirror inverts left and right, however what feynman was trying to explain that even though we perceive the left/ right axis to flip it is the one that is pointing into the mirror that actually gets inverted.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Omg, nothing is inverted. It's simply a reflection. There's no explaining to be done. The mirror reflects visible light near perfectly. It seems like a "flipped" or "inverted" image because the mirror has the same viewpoint that another person would have if looking at you. The mirror allows you to see your self from the front as others see you. There is no inverting or flipping done. This video was pointless.
Nice work NightshadeMortis - you have a level of scientific knowledge, combined with an articulate yet clear voice that speaks to me in ways I never thought possible. Your deep and strongly scientific explanation of how a mirror works is like poetry to me. You really are a genius. I wish I could be like you. You are my idol.
No, he's really not. He essentially said the same thing that Feynman said; that "everything's really alright." No trickery on the mirror's part, nothing to be explained. It's just a product of your own perception.
path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, the theory of quantum electrodynamics and the physics of the super fluidity of super cooled liquid helium, as well as work in particle physics (he proposed the Parton model). For his contributions to the development of quantum electrodynamics, Feynman was a joint recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965, together with Julian Schwinger and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga.
what have you accomplished? other than getting a nuke in mw2
A mirror is not a retro reflector... so it doesn't return them in the direction that they came in. It is simply reflecting them, so angle of incidence equals angle of reflection.
some sweet info here
msjessypp 1 week ago
I need his brain for my physics and mathematics tests/exams (A) Such a wonderful man
sk8shred 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some people want young white females to mix with non-white males.
I made a one-minute video highlighting a very tiny sample of race-mixing advertisements.
I love white people, and I am opposed to race-mixing. But I do not hate non-whites.
If you click on my name “autumntree2011” highlighted in blue below this comment, you can watch my video.
(I'm not a fan of Hitler or KKK.)
autumntree2011 3 months ago
WHAT KEEPS A TRAIN ON THE TRACK???!!!
Manwithcam 4 months ago
what we see in the mirror is a defraction of light. what the hell is he talking about" squashing heads to look like us"??? hell is this guy
cnestudy1 8 months ago
@cnestudy1 defraction? That's not a word. Perhaps you mean diffraction?
But even if you do mean diffraction, you're still wrong. Diffraction is what happens to waves as they pass around an obstacle. Mirrors don't diffract, they reflect.
And to answer your final question, this guy is Richard Feynman, and he's right and you were wrong! =)
Azyashi 6 months ago 2
It really should have been called a fbrev - as mirror is not an accurate description. fb standing for front back and rev for reverser.
the42Q 10 months ago
That's exactly the question I was thinking about a few weeks ago standing in the bath and brushing my teeth:)
Th0111 10 months ago
Basically, Feynman is saying reflection is different to rotation, but when we first see a mirror we think the image has been rotated though the image it is in fact reflected.
GalacticMuppet 11 months ago
"We don't think of the idea that the person has been pushed and squashed backwards-forwards, because that's not what ordinarily happens to people." Pfft, this guy's never been to Detroit, obviously.
WarPhalange 1 year ago
Anyone who has ever taken organic chemistry should know this.
mililaniguy 2 years ago
Can you explicate this?
MajorGeneralPanic 2 years ago
Look up stereoisomers. That should help explain.
mililaniguy 2 years ago
My answer was light relfection but yeah that answer sounds good... I guess.
gamewarrior2216 2 years ago
Wow, I feel smart because I know what keeps a train on the tracks. Thanks, Physics class.
spacepirate725 2 years ago
I hope when I get old I can sit in a wing-back chair and sound like that.
TheHaohmaru 2 years ago 2
If someone asked me that question, I would think they were a retard and I would away....clearly I'd be at the wrong college. That is not a trick question...at all.
NightshadeMortis 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't doubt that Feynman was a genius but the average person can understand that mirrors invert right and left. Hell even pigs and cats understand this concept.
designflaw01 2 years ago
@designflaw01 you obviously did not finish the video... It is obvious that the mirror inverts left and right, however what feynman was trying to explain that even though we perceive the left/ right axis to flip it is the one that is pointing into the mirror that actually gets inverted.
bspoka 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Omg, nothing is inverted. It's simply a reflection. There's no explaining to be done. The mirror reflects visible light near perfectly. It seems like a "flipped" or "inverted" image because the mirror has the same viewpoint that another person would have if looking at you. The mirror allows you to see your self from the front as others see you. There is no inverting or flipping done. This video was pointless.
NightshadeMortis 2 years ago
Nice work NightshadeMortis - you have a level of scientific knowledge, combined with an articulate yet clear voice that speaks to me in ways I never thought possible. Your deep and strongly scientific explanation of how a mirror works is like poetry to me. You really are a genius. I wish I could be like you. You are my idol.
agenteighty 2 years ago 16
...*locks doors*
NightshadeMortis 2 years ago
@NightshadeMortis Holy shit you're stupid.
Manwithcam 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Manwithcam "Holy shit you're stupid."
No, he's really not. He essentially said the same thing that Feynman said; that "everything's really alright." No trickery on the mirror's part, nothing to be explained. It's just a product of your own perception.
StupidIdiot12345 2 months ago
@NightshadeMortis 'The mirror allows you to see your self from the front as others see you.'
When others look at me from the front my heart is not on the right.
wowsa0 4 months ago
@wowsa0 Well...mine is.
NightshadeMortis 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how the hell is he a genius..?
this is something any normal person could figure out in their brain in a matter of milliseconds..-_-
he just explain the whole process that runs through your head
cunfyoosed 2 years ago
If you listened, it was a typical problem used in MIT fraternities. And most folks, the answer is only obvious once it is explained.
And the part of genius is to boil a complex problem down to its essentials so that the answer seem easy.
Psued0Name 2 years ago
@cunfyoosed
path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, the theory of quantum electrodynamics and the physics of the super fluidity of super cooled liquid helium, as well as work in particle physics (he proposed the Parton model). For his contributions to the development of quantum electrodynamics, Feynman was a joint recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965, together with Julian Schwinger and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga.
what have you accomplished? other than getting a nuke in mw2
thatguy388 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
thatguy388 2 years ago
I thought he was going to explain how the silvering returns the photons in the direction from which they came.
NSResponder 2 years ago 21
lol same
omidsarmad 2 years ago
A mirror is not a retro reflector... so it doesn't return them in the direction that they came in. It is simply reflecting them, so angle of incidence equals angle of reflection.
Gansmiller 10 months ago
lol, i thought of the same question while checking my car's mirrors a few months ago XD
ludmac7 2 years ago
Degrasse is awesome too. he really grabs your attention.
dhannyboy86 2 years ago
only 142 views? sad
dhannyboy86 2 years ago 2
@dhannyboy86 29,202 now
rageatm4life 3 months ago
@rageatm4life Sweet! all these Feynman video views are increasing! I take it as a good sign
dhannyboy86 3 months ago
Brilliant! There are mere geniuses, then there is Feynman!
alien8ted 2 years ago 5
Yes! Feynman is brilliant and equally entertaining unlike many other boring dull scientists.
Carl Sagan is another of my favt. Scientist.
greenleaf81 2 years ago 5