Added: 3 years ago
From: stopprop10
Views: 932
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Vote No on 10, we can;t afford $10 billion when California is going broke

  • Prop 10 is terrible for California. I say No on 10

  • Whats wrong with money spent on hybrid rebates, alternative energy research, and wind power? People who are bashing Pickens are missing the point (and, in my opinion, wrong). I voted YES on Prop 10.

  • For openers, most of the money under Prop 10 goes to trucking companies to buy natural gas powered trucks that will fill up at a Pickens gas station, but that are not required to be cleaner than diesel trucks and are not required to stay in California - we pay, interstate trucking companies take our money and run. Hybrids get next to nothing with Prop 10. It's a deceptive measure that's been condemend by Sierra Club, Union of Concerned Scientists, League of Conservation Voters and NRDC. No on 10

  • Pickens has a great plan to stop sending 700 billion in the arab world. What's your plan? Who are you to judge him? Do you got a better plan?

  • You meant to ask: Who are the voters of California to judge a Pickens-funded ballot measure that would cost us $10 billion and produce no improvement in air quality, or even have any accountability to insure the billions we spend are spend to benefit Californians? Every major environmental group: Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters, Union of Concerned Scientists, NRDC have judged and FLUNKED Prop 10.

  • No on Prop 10. Send Pickens packing.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more