Added: 1 year ago
From: slumberm83
Views: 5,354
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I admire and support indie artists. But this sounds like a bad attempt to recreate something that was magnificent to begin with. Sorry guys.

  • Just because the male part doesn't sound like he's got a BAC of 0.8 and has ingested all the drugs in the world doesn't mean Torque doesn't sing it fantastically. Just because this version is a lot softer and not so punk sounding doesn't mean it's bad, it's just different.

    I prefer this one by far, the male part in the original puts me off massively. I prefer Millan's voice to MacColl's, but that's just my opinion. Have some respect, Stars are not punk. Punk is a genre that TRIES to sound bad.

  • @xSoupyTwistx Punk has nothing to do with it. The fact is that the lyrics are conveying a particular emotional tone and the vocals in this cover convey a radically different tone. I have nothing against an artist trying to make a song their own when they cover it but the lyrical vs. vocal contrast here is as radical as if Mr. Rogers did a read aloud from a Charles Bukowski book. Actually... that sounds pretty fucking rad.

  • Ew ew ew *runs back to The Pogues*

  • Ahhh This SUCKS! They should have never touched it. Really bad.

  • Yeeeaaaahhh NO T_T Sorry so much less powerful than the original :S

  • Good God... nononononononono. Sorry, someone told me they thought this was better than the original, i find it awful...

  • This is also a cover of the Pogues song. :)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more