There is a quick simple solution to global warming and climate change. It is called Muon Catalysed Fusion. As worked on Star Scientific. NO CO2. NO Greenhouse Gases. NO Toxic Waste. The source is dueterium from the World's Oceans - virtually limitless. It is cheap to produce. WE NEED IT NOW. See the website "Star Scientific Limited", Blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath", Youtube video - "In the Footsteps of Fusion"
I do agree that scares are dumb, but they are able to be propagated by shotty media coverage who loves fear based stories and by dumb people who run wild with stories they don't understand. As for politicians and green initiatives, people try to make money anywhere they can. Just because people use something of this scale does not mean it is fake. It just means some disgusting human beings are using fear to make money and skirt liberties. Look at the word terrorism.
why is it that people use "not understanding" as some kind of evidence against its validity? How hard is it to wrap your head around the idea that an exponentially rising population, that loves destroying the earth, just might be adding to something that occurs naturally? You would have to be delusional to think that 6 billion people many of whom breathe, drive, and consume products (whose production release harmful toxins) don't play any role in deteriorating the global landscape.
@steve7508: I'm not an older man, and i understand that this whole thing has been a scam from the get go..... so maybe you should add 20 something's to your list of people who don't get it.... maybe older men see through it quicker cause they remember when people were screaming about a coming ice age..... or maybe your premise is just very unsound.
It's often older men who dismiss the science on climate change. Maybe it's something to do with fear of death and irrelevance. They just can't accept it, no matter what the evidence says.
@Steve7508 Maybe it has something to do with the lack of real scientific evidence, computer models designed to show warming with increased CO2 and cherry-picked temperature recording sites. It might also have something to do with the fact that there is a political agenda behind climate alarmism. Also, retired scientists do not have to rely on funding and can afford to be sceptical.
@whistler2255 Sorry, but you will never debate a "PROFESSIONAL" global warming skeptics. Those for-hire scientists are kept on lavish oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico, where energy executives shower them with gifts of exotix perfume and fruit.
Climate scientists have been keeping accurate records of the surface's temperature for the past 150 years, and those records definitively show that the Earth is getting warmer- a conclusion that's supported by data gathered from ice cores, satellites, and weather balloons.
people think to much and go for shit we should just leave alone. obviuosly ppl just over react and go looking for things that dont exsist and make what they want out of something when they are just paranoid misinformed ppl. some of what he said was true but in all honesty he should just leave it alone... because we are butting in to governmental shit that we can never win. dont argue or reply to this unless you have something relevant to say.
@madiovich i think you're the idiot because you probably believed everything he said and are now calling me... someone who passed AP Chemistry and AP biology with flying colors, an idiot... just because some tea drinking homo wrote a book about something, that was totally opinion based btw, doesnt make it true!!! dont call me an idiot when i know more than "Tea and Crumpets" British dude does, oh and that wasnt a bag on English ppl... just this guy!
There are thousands of reliable websites showing truly overwhelming evidences- but... gathering valuable information is what the "sceptics" absolutely and always disallow and refuse. What about to investigate for yourself in things you dare to deny them like remote controlled idiots?
climate. nasa. g ov / evidence /
I know.. science is a conspiracy. And Obama is a muslim from kenya... Drill baby drill.
He also does not understand how the IPCC works, it is a summary of thousands of scientists' work, the people in the IPCC just summarise the information from around the world. There have been minor corrections to the LARGE report (it would be surprising if there weren't any errors at all), but none has changed the overwhelming evidence showing climate change is happening and man-made CO2 is at the core of it. I'd also like to see his evidence of corruption in the IPCC.
Here's how scares really work. People who have expertise notice there is a problem coming up. They start to make noise. Politicians ignore them. Finally everyone admits there could be a problem. Money is put into fixing or avoiding the problem. We avoid a disaster. Then some twit like Booker comes along and makes money out of printing books that say "nothing would have happened anyway". I'll bet he would have written "The Titanic scare!" if they had listened and avoided the iceberg.
This guy is the one who dishonest. Mad cow was real and so is global warming caused by man. The world largest scientific organization whose reputations are on line have studied the data and it is clear that climate change is human caused. Research it.
@Denrnr for sure BSE/CJD is real, my mother died of it in 1993 and so did my friends mother.. And I can tell you that was something that is not natural (Kuru). Climate change is not man made it occurs naturally. We may have helped it but I am more concerned about the Methane levels which are purely natural and are rising fast. Temp is not a reaction to CO2, CO2 is an 800 year reaction to temp - do your research and put Al Gores charts where they are supposed to be - 800 years apart.
@mustanglead Just because CO2 rise has previously happened AFTER a climate change caused by some other factor (these factors are pretty well understood), does not mean that CO2 can't itself cause a change. This is broken logic. Heat from a magnifying glass causes fire after a delay. By your logic fire can't cause heat. Take 45 minutes and learn some geology and how CO2 interacted with the earth's climate in the past. Search "Alley AGU" and look for the one titled A23A.
@indulis1 I read it (thanks for that) but I still don't buy it. Climate change is real, I have no illusions about that but I think you should spend more time camped outside the fossil fuel companies HQ's. After all it's them who say it's public demand that drives them but on the other hand they will say that the public gets whatever they give them. You should be there convincing them to give up their greed for profits, complete disregard for human life and environment and to release new tech.
@mustanglead You need to separate the fact of human-caused climate change from what we need to do to fix it/avoid making it worse/cope with it. Unfortunately the number of people running around saying "its not happening" or "it is but it isn't people and fossil fuels" or "it is but it will be good for us" is ensuring NOTHING gets done. Estimates are that the fossil fuel industry makes $4B a year in profits every year action is delayed. That is a big incentive to push against change.
@indulis1 As far as I am aware there are plenty of people with plenty of 'fossil fuel' free technology ideas that can never get a patent.. Now that needs to change for one. I need to seperate nothing my friend, we cannot be responsible for the planets in the inner solar system heating up at the same time as well. For sure change has to come but it has to be from the top down not the other way round beacause as you may have noticed we no longer live in a democracy. What you gonna do???
@mustanglead Well the earth's climate has changed in the past due resons like changes in sunlight received etc, so the other planets can also be changing due to other reasons (volcanoes) which is nothing to do with us. The recorded measurements of the amount of sunlight received on the earth over the years say that it is not changing. So that is not causing climate change. Nothings else fits the amount of global heating except CO2, and it fits is pretty much spot on (3C per doubling of CO2).
@indulis1 Yeah just another coincidence.. Look I am as concerned about this as much as you are, I have 2 children that I want to grow up in a world that is safe and liveable. I want them to have the facts the truthfull facts, I don't want them to be in debt with the banks until they are 70 which they already are, I don't want them to be part of any phoney wars after some bogus made-up villain, I don't want them to be breathing crap that comes from Stadis-450. We have to all standup now. Lies.
I too am starting to trust RT a bit more, but I always look at the information given for did I have a choice on what information was being given out? Nope. So I fact check what it is I want to know for the day and move on from there.
One thing does get me with all of this fake terrorist tactics of fear is no one has a solution to stop anything, be it global warming or CO2 reduction and a solution does exist. We can stop using oil, coal, and take full control of our own energy needs.
@19t86 Tell that to the thermometers, satellites, radiosondes, glaciers, seasons, migrating birds, melting ice caps, flood and drought victims, dying species, Pentagon, etc.
They, along with all the expert climatologists, will tell you different.
why has you used mad cow D as an exaple? that was a very real danger, hell, my uncle dead from that by having a blood tranfution by somone who was infected. he doesn't site his sources for his claims on global warming and the clamate gate thing was also shown not to be a scandle and was just media hype (irony much).
VEUILLEZ NE PAS LIRE CECI. Vous obtiendrez embrassé le vendredi le plus proche possible par l'amour de votre vie. Le demain sera le meilleur jour de votre vie. Cependant, si vous ne signalez pas ce commentaire au moins à 3 videos, vous mourrez dans les 2 jours. Le copy et collent ceci, pour être sauvés ...
This guy is a moron. Ressources are finite. Our economies are the epitome of all things unsustainable. It's a big casino of pyramid scemes and cheap oil, wasting and destroying the water, the soil, the air, the ressources, the animals. Global warming is an irrelevant, distracting sideshow.
@z1zaz "No climate warming - no job ! " is one of the biggest falicies. Most of the climate scientists in the US are government scientists - they cant be fired and so they have a job no matter what they conclude. Many academic climatologists are tenured professors - their salary is paid by the college. Other countires have different systems even more independent of their conclusions.
Most $s in US climate sience go to aerospace companies & paying for graduate student salaries & travel.
Of course they WILL be fired if they don't toe the official anthropomorghic global warming line.
Check out our British Brainwashing Corporation weather reporters for example.
They are not weather men any more, but Global/ Climatology experts who cannot even get their forecasts right any more because the Chemsprayers keep messing the weather up on us !
@z1zaz You may not want to believe it but it is true. In the US a government employee cannot be fired or reassigned unless there is proof of an illegal act. During the Bush administration AGW was not the official line and several agencies were instructed to muzzle their scientists on the issue but the scientists ignored the orders and kept on telling the truth - as a result Bush cut their funding but was frustrated that he was unable to fire them. They tried to go after Jim Hansen but failed.
@z1zaz We do. NOAA puts out a monthly report on climate. There is the NOAA climate prediction center in Suitland Maryland about 10 minutes round the Beltway from where I live and another in Boulder plus the region centers - they all put out regular reports and publish papers about their work. NASA has several active climate groups - the biggest at NASA Goddard (where I work) it has the wing of one huge building to itself. NSF also supports climate groups - primarily NCAR who write lots of papers
@z1zaz No they are publically stating there is. My point is that they have no axe to grind. They have their jobs, they have their assignment no matter what conclusion they come to so their political bosses have no way to pressure them (either way). Attempts be the Bush administration to control their statements backfired and got several Bush appointees fired. If Obama is stupid enough to do the same thing his people would suffer the same fate. Politicians now know it is hands off the science.
@z1zaz For goodness sake you are seeing conspiracies where ther are none. Who checks the data? Other independent groups - there are several world wide that do this analysis and they come up with basically the same results even using different analysis techniques and combinations of the data
No data has been erased. You can request all that original data from the various national weather services. Much of it is on the NOAA NCDC website in its raw and processed form, you can request the codes
Climate audit is run by one of th ebiggest scam artists (McIntyre)
Above top secret makes WND look mainstream
If that is where you get your "facts" then you need some new sources.
I told you where you could get all the data, see how the analysis is done, and request the codes - go try it. Get back to me when you understand a little more about data analysis.
@z1zaz Then stop being so dense. A political blog paid for by the oil industry or owned by fox news is not a releiable source of information.
Google NOAA NCDC and follow the data and services links and climate monitoring.
Journals: Nature, Science, EOS, and anything from the AMS
Society Pronouncements - see the Royal Society, National Academy of sciences, AGU, AMS, and just about any other scientific society. In fact EVERY US science society has now endorsed the AGW theory.
@z1zaz I just gave you 9 specific places to go. Go to those organizations and search on climate and read what it says. Those are the sources I use plus the NOAA NGDC for the Solar data. If you want to go to the grand daddy of them all though it is 5 years old, Google "IPCC FAR WG1 report" there is over 1000 pages of good hard science there. It'll alter your mind.
I am sorry if you find it offensive but I find it highly offensive for you to be equating political websites with scientific data.
Please get it through your head that it does not matter what political leanings ANY person or service might have.
We are all susceptible to and thus have concerns about *OUR* Earth's climate and you have no right to judge anyone's understanding by assessing their political background !!!!!
Please provide direct links to the figures you base YOUR comments on.
@z1zaz I have the right to mak eth eprofession judgement that their "scientific" data and arguments are half truthsor downright lies. Then ask the question why they do this, the most plausible explanation is that they are following a political agenda or a financial one.
In fact ther was an internal memo released from Exxon laying out such a political strategy to undermine the science and data. They are clearly folowing that strategy
You have the sites, too lazy to use google, your problem
I followed your "IPCC FAR WG1 report" link. More please.
TOTALLY INADEQUATE.
It covers only 150 years of temperature measurements.
Worse, it covers CO2 measurements from year 0000.AD, since when it reports CO2 as level until recently - yet FAILS to mention or *explain* the Middle Age warm period circa 1000 years ago.
Too much 'Professional' guidance and statistics have been used here to steer readers away from the REAL TRUTH they fail to address !!!!!
@z1zaz That statement shows that you dont want to know the truth just want to spout propagada from Exxon et al.as you have plainly not even looked at the IPCC WG1 report. Chapter 6 is entitled paleoclimatology and section 6.3 (figure 6.1) goes back 600My. Fig 6.3 and associated sections deal with the last 700,000 years. There is a whole section about the holocene (6.5) - the current interglacial - and another on the last 2000y in detail (6.6).
The Truth is that you too are obfuscating (like those who wrote the IPCC report) by avoiding responding to the fact that temperatures in the middle ages rose without CO2 being involved, thus PROVING that there is NO DIRECT LINK !
And no need to be offensive by accusing me of being lazy, when you have failed to provide other links for everyone to examine.
Also accusing me of spouting Exxon propaganda - I don't know what you are on about. Did they raise that same point too ?
@z1zaz Two Points: 1) The temperatures rose in the middle ages in W. Europe and E. US and nowhere else. 2) You make the incorrect assumption that one result (inceasing temperatures) can only be caused by one effect when it can be caused by many (orbital shifts, solar activity, GHGs, shifts in ocean currents, El Nino, etc)
The trick is to sort out which one - that requries data to confirm the most likely cause and refute the ones that dont fit. That is why AGW is the only viable one left.
@z1zaz The reason why I say you are spouting Exxon propaganda is that 3 of the 4 the sources you claimed to trust are funded by Exxon. The other was owned by Fox.
PS in case you did not know that YouTUbe does not allow you to post links to other sites. So instead of scrambling it to avoid the rule that we all signed up to adhere to which is a royal pain I gave you a simple google search item that would take you right there for all this. You have all you need - use it.
Well I am not spouting Exxon propaganda, and I did not know they made the same point - being that past temperature changes were independent of CO2, thus CO2 cannot be stated as being causative of temperarure change.
Yes, as *therrydicule* clarifies, of course man can and IS creating climate change, and the longer that our twitter-head politicians leave our planet without replacing the healing tree population we long ago consumed, then the quicker we, and the planet, will DIE !
@z1zaz "being that past temperature changes were independent of CO2, thus CO2 cannot be stated as being causative of temperarure change." That statement is Exxon funded propaganda as it simply is NOT true.
If you mean the ice core data - the warming was initiated by changes in the Earth's orbit but the resulting change in solar input was way too small to account for the observed temperature changes - it is the increase in GHGs that resulted from that initial warm up that mostly caused it
@z1zaz Actually I dont have the foggiest idea. Albedo is a knotty problem. I am away from NASA GSFC at a conference, I'll ask one of the Earth Scientists when I get home.
My guess (I stress GUESS) is that the surface area of glaciers are so small that from a global temperature perspective they wont make much difference. There was something in a journal I read that talked about black carbon aerosols darkening snow which might be a larger problem.
And now that we overtaxed minions have clean oil burning motors where do all the particulates come from -
burning tropical forests
burning coal
industry, including oil refineries
We are already past a tipping point, with idiotic Chemtrailing making it worse by modifying weather patterns which now cool temperate regions but warm the poles
We need global tree planting and ban on clearing PDQ
Plus World legislated Family Planning, forgotten about since I was a student !
@z1zaz The particles (aerosols) mostly come from burning of coal and they help cool the planet on balance (they also cause many of the breathing ailments we suffer from). Oil is the 2nd worse polluter after coal.
Tree planting will help a tiny bit. You would have to cover most to the planet's arable land with trees to offset US emissions alone.
There are multiple tipping points the longer we go as we are the more we will cross. I agree on family planning but it will never happen here (US)
ARABLE land is a fraction of the Earth's surface, the rest must be planted and managed - plenty jobs there !
Family planning MUST happen, and is organisable, but there has been a refusal by Politicians to sort this out - other than by planet polluting wars, harmful Chemtrail and vaccination activities etc
Truth - Children born not decreasing per couple not of increased age, thus human heating has already increased beyond a straight line effect.
@z1zaz The planet will survive us, some species will evolve... However, we have problems.
The temperature change are not dependent of CO2 but gazes, in many form. What happen is that many activities on earth finish in change in the chemical formation of the atmosphere.
The politician, to be fair, should attack Methane and SF6. Sulfur hexafloride but it is 20 000 times worst than CO2 at equal quantity, but I never heard of it on the news...
@z1zaz The medieval warm period was indeed warmer than some subsequent century, but not as warm as the 20th century ;) Also, this medieval raise was not synchronous, which is the case right now. Therefor, the cause was not only CO2. However, we also get, just after it, the little ice age: suggesting a thermoregulation of anomalies.
You also forget others gazes, such as SO4, which was lower in this period according to Zielinski.
That the 3 part phenomena you start to get: Many media member misunderstand global warming and will over-simplified, creating the liaison GhG=CO2, and foolishly debate on that. The case is more complex than that (what about CH4, NOx,, HfC SOx, Dms?). This misunderstanding and unwillingness linked to oversimplification create false idioms. Being pedantic, I will tell you that their is a complex relation between human produced gazes and weather.
Yes, only when scientists admit that they misled politicians re this CO2 hype will our Global environment ever be sorted out.
You mentioned much, but not either the continuing human deforestation of out planet, nor the past particulate pollution coating causing increased polar region melting, and which is presently being exacerbated by Chemtrailing and NASA's three massive high altitude particulsate bombs last year.
@z1zaz The scientists have not exclusively focused on CO2 but all GHGs and aerosols. They have also included other process (volcanoes, solar, ocen currents,...) in the reconstruction of past climates. Again if you read the IPCC report as I advised you would know this.
Thus they have not misled any politicians they have no motive in doing so - in fact it would be financially and scintifically suicidal for them to do so.
The scientific community is using these stupid false scares to distract us from the things we REALLY have to worry about like lyme disease. They think they've got us "stupid non-scientific types" by the balls and they think they are going to get away with it.
This is known as "Problem, Reaction, Soluion" Google it and the "totalitarian tiptoe" understanding them is vital to understanding how we are being manipulated.
The UN itself is a fraud. I think it should be shut down. Why anyone is still willing to fund it is beyond me. A big waste of time and money like the League of Nations was.
Whether we're the cause of global warming or not, it was being exploited for a bunch of political frauds (i.e. carbon taxes, cap n trade, Gore/Blood Inc.). The swine flu is being touted as another fraud that was profited by big pharma. Strange how science is being used this way.
the title equation is a win. i hope some more people understand how this works now because sometimes when a scare gets super hyped by the news, i wonder 'how are so many people so ignorant that they fall for this?!' and then i feel sad from thinking about how gullible people are.
@TerminalMontage How is her shirt too revealing? It doesn't 'reveal' anything. Its barely even a v-cut. Or are you refering to that her wrists and face are exposed? Perhaps you think she should be under a veil and in shackles for commiting the greatest crime of inhumanity, for which God gives no surrender! Being, ... a woman. Stone her!!
Media need to stop interpreting scientific data and come with their own conclusions. Rather they should present the scientific results or give a venue for where viewers can see the scientific results and let the people analyze and interpret it. This will not only lead to false conclusions but give both politicians and more importantly the people that vote them into office to make constructive decisions and notice poor research being done on major issues.
But there's no sense of crying over every mistake. You just keep on trying till you run out of cake. And the science gets done and you make a neat gun, for the people who are still alive.
when its found that the scare is false the media is quite, "well lets move on from that" says the media lady... hehe
YES YES PASS MORE LAWS AND TAXES< the politians love scares it always ends ion more laws and more regulation MORE TAXES
So do you think these politians are instigating these scares, to say that they are not involved is ignorant. The politians choses which "EXPERT WITNESS" to put in front of the other officals, and who ever speaks first is right, everyone else must prove them wrong
I'm glad that he is at least pretty much saying that Global Warming is a lie. But toward the end he seemed to say that everything would be fine if the whole world was run like the United States is by the Feds? Ha ha ha ha None of what is going on is by chance... It's all by design. And it won't stop till either the people take back their power, or the elite have killed or enslaved us all.
One serious problem with RT is that it is not a real "independent" station in terms of its views... It just vents out raw hatered of EU and USA... We have such shit stations in USA too but even they don't vent out such hate at a specific part of the world and do provide full coverage and give credit where it's due...
@EsotericDesi RT is bias yes, but they are not as bad as the U.S media... RT is a lot more reliable, and tell's the truth way more often then THE U.S MEDIA...
Why don't RT interview Vladimir Putin and ask him why he instructed Russian scientists to altar their findings that said CO2 was not causing global warming and change it to support the IPCC?
All I hear from RT is American and EU governments are liars and nothing about Russia, who go along with them. Russia could release satellite images showing the chemtrails, the real data on CO2 and climate change but they don't.
This is all by design, all Governments are controlled by a small few.
@CommonSensePeter my 1st thought on RT was 'finally, a station not bound by US media constricts.' Its not about Russia. Maybe Russians could air a station in a foreign country that wont restrict their views as much
@CommonSensePeter TV is defunct, the internet is the only place to get your news. And may Peace be unto you my brother, for yes we are all in this together, and the quicker people come to realize this, the better chance we will have to survive. Namaste
@CommonSensePeter Because Putin will shut them down and KILL them if they expose him like that. Guantanamo is a new thing for Americans but in Russia it's business as usual.
@CommonSensePeter: Putin signed Kyoto DESPITE the RAS (Russian Academy of Sciences) insistence that there is no basis for AGW based on CO2 emissions.
You got it the other way around.
The Russians aren't that stupid to follow those accords anyway, and the only 2 reasons why they even signed Kyoto is 1) 1990 base-level, which means that 30% increase in CO2 would look like 20% reduction on paper, AND 2) Kyoto could make Russia the Saudi Arabia of carbon offset trading.
@CommonSensePeter CO2 is NOT a relevant factor in "global warming." Global warming is not even real. It is an idea to create a "global scare" to try and pass legislation to tax people and maybe more legislation to just perpetuate some sort of opressive measure.
@CommonSensePeter People just need to look at things a little more closely and follow the money, if they don't realise by now that the money is the power then theres no hope.
I completely agree with his assesment of the impact of the politicizing of the global warming issue on developing nations. The utter arrogance and gall of the rich western countries when it comes to Africa and parts of Asia is stupifying. Because of the media and a handful of well financed, politically motivated 'scientists' hundreds of thousands if not millions of people will suffer and die. White man always gets his way.
@PlayingGuitarRules corn. There is no wealth, just illusory power and fiat money. What has created all of what we have/had pertaining to wealth: corn, and minor cash crops (corn is one but only because we produce so much of it, but it's virtually the only thing we export besides jobs. We are poor, you'll and all of the rest of us will be forced to witness this eventually.
Im not trying to scare anybody, but I just wanna say be careful about taking regular flu shots, now they just might be filled with the same solution made for swine flu.
swine flu oh no.... and people till this day don't say anything about it.. can u say ADD? ahahhahhaha people forget everything... or just say eh and keep living like its ok they scared us.. it was a false flag... lmao... and who knows what was in those vaccines that people got.... the gov says they got couple millions of vaccines in storage just gathering dust lol....what a waste it came from the us then they blame mexico... lol... u see how mexico tourism has gone down... scare tactics
I'm waiting for the "study" that states CO2 is created by Al Queda and Osama Bin Laden therefore "global warming" is real and we need more taxes. Hahaha!
@Th3Wab3 hiv was the very 1st contagion that the general consensus on contagions was not followed and now we have an epidemic. before you say that it is not right to do such things, it is the lesser evil to of have them in colonies when it would have been a few 10's of thousands versus the 25-40 million people that have it now that will undoubtedly continue to spread it around and rot slowly and die from an uncovered sneeze
@Th3Wab3 the facts that weaken the HIV = AIDS causation many. to list a few the gender and age disparities that differ according to region. the fact that different regions use different test which cause results that contradict each other. the research on retrovirus causations and function are inconclusive... AIDS = 30 some diseases many of which are symptoms that are found in peoples who are exposed to fecal contaminated water and malnutrition. the link is dubious...
This has been flagged as spam show
There is a quick simple solution to global warming and climate change. It is called Muon Catalysed Fusion. As worked on Star Scientific. NO CO2. NO Greenhouse Gases. NO Toxic Waste. The source is dueterium from the World's Oceans - virtually limitless. It is cheap to produce. WE NEED IT NOW. See the website "Star Scientific Limited", Blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath", Youtube video - "In the Footsteps of Fusion"
2110kop 6 months ago
Thanks for Realists we are not on the brink of self-destruction just yet... wait, what?
toulouse666 11 months ago
What a lunatic.
AlmightScoop 1 year ago
@AlmightScoop Your the lunatic.
Sugardaddy501 10 months ago
Global warming exists, but mankind is only responsible for 3.5% so stfu you whiny bitches
rootbeer9000 1 year ago
I do agree that scares are dumb, but they are able to be propagated by shotty media coverage who loves fear based stories and by dumb people who run wild with stories they don't understand. As for politicians and green initiatives, people try to make money anywhere they can. Just because people use something of this scale does not mean it is fake. It just means some disgusting human beings are using fear to make money and skirt liberties. Look at the word terrorism.
atrider84 1 year ago 3
why is it that people use "not understanding" as some kind of evidence against its validity? How hard is it to wrap your head around the idea that an exponentially rising population, that loves destroying the earth, just might be adding to something that occurs naturally? You would have to be delusional to think that 6 billion people many of whom breathe, drive, and consume products (whose production release harmful toxins) don't play any role in deteriorating the global landscape.
atrider84 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Global power by global warming it's clear.
alijabaful 1 year ago
This guy is a crank. He believes in Intelligent Design and doesn't believe in Evolution.
MrPlaid81 1 year ago
@MrPlaid81 Proof please.
ucdconnectq 1 year ago
@steve7508: I'm not an older man, and i understand that this whole thing has been a scam from the get go..... so maybe you should add 20 something's to your list of people who don't get it.... maybe older men see through it quicker cause they remember when people were screaming about a coming ice age..... or maybe your premise is just very unsound.
metagordian 1 year ago
It's often older men who dismiss the science on climate change. Maybe it's something to do with fear of death and irrelevance. They just can't accept it, no matter what the evidence says.
Steve7508 1 year ago
@Steve7508 Maybe it has something to do with the lack of real scientific evidence, computer models designed to show warming with increased CO2 and cherry-picked temperature recording sites. It might also have something to do with the fact that there is a political agenda behind climate alarmism. Also, retired scientists do not have to rely on funding and can afford to be sceptical.
whistler2255 1 year ago 2
@whistler2255 Sorry, but you will never debate a "PROFESSIONAL" global warming skeptics. Those for-hire scientists are kept on lavish oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico, where energy executives shower them with gifts of exotix perfume and fruit.
ihateneveen 6 months ago
Climate scientists have been keeping accurate records of the surface's temperature for the past 150 years, and those records definitively show that the Earth is getting warmer- a conclusion that's supported by data gathered from ice cores, satellites, and weather balloons.
ihateneveen 6 months ago
people think to much and go for shit we should just leave alone. obviuosly ppl just over react and go looking for things that dont exsist and make what they want out of something when they are just paranoid misinformed ppl. some of what he said was true but in all honesty he should just leave it alone... because we are butting in to governmental shit that we can never win. dont argue or reply to this unless you have something relevant to say.
Clipseproductionrep 1 year ago
Comment removed
madiovich 1 year ago
@madiovich i think you're the idiot because you probably believed everything he said and are now calling me... someone who passed AP Chemistry and AP biology with flying colors, an idiot... just because some tea drinking homo wrote a book about something, that was totally opinion based btw, doesnt make it true!!! dont call me an idiot when i know more than "Tea and Crumpets" British dude does, oh and that wasnt a bag on English ppl... just this guy!
Clipseproductionrep 1 year ago
Global warming is real.....take a look around.
Dennybeeify 1 year ago
@Dennybeeify This issue is man-made global warming, and in fact, the last decade has seen a decrease in 'rising' temperatures.
megadethmonk 1 year ago
hes an idiot
There are thousands of reliable websites showing truly overwhelming evidences- but... gathering valuable information is what the "sceptics" absolutely and always disallow and refuse. What about to investigate for yourself in things you dare to deny them like remote controlled idiots?
climate. nasa. g ov / evidence /
I know.. science is a conspiracy. And Obama is a muslim from kenya... Drill baby drill.
aerobique 1 year ago
He also does not understand how the IPCC works, it is a summary of thousands of scientists' work, the people in the IPCC just summarise the information from around the world. There have been minor corrections to the LARGE report (it would be surprising if there weren't any errors at all), but none has changed the overwhelming evidence showing climate change is happening and man-made CO2 is at the core of it. I'd also like to see his evidence of corruption in the IPCC.
indulis1 1 year ago
Here's how scares really work. People who have expertise notice there is a problem coming up. They start to make noise. Politicians ignore them. Finally everyone admits there could be a problem. Money is put into fixing or avoiding the problem. We avoid a disaster. Then some twit like Booker comes along and makes money out of printing books that say "nothing would have happened anyway". I'll bet he would have written "The Titanic scare!" if they had listened and avoided the iceberg.
indulis1 1 year ago
This guy is the one who dishonest. Mad cow was real and so is global warming caused by man. The world largest scientific organization whose reputations are on line have studied the data and it is clear that climate change is human caused. Research it.
Denrnr 1 year ago
@Denrnr for sure BSE/CJD is real, my mother died of it in 1993 and so did my friends mother.. And I can tell you that was something that is not natural (Kuru). Climate change is not man made it occurs naturally. We may have helped it but I am more concerned about the Methane levels which are purely natural and are rising fast. Temp is not a reaction to CO2, CO2 is an 800 year reaction to temp - do your research and put Al Gores charts where they are supposed to be - 800 years apart.
mustanglead 1 year ago
@mustanglead Just because CO2 rise has previously happened AFTER a climate change caused by some other factor (these factors are pretty well understood), does not mean that CO2 can't itself cause a change. This is broken logic. Heat from a magnifying glass causes fire after a delay. By your logic fire can't cause heat. Take 45 minutes and learn some geology and how CO2 interacted with the earth's climate in the past. Search "Alley AGU" and look for the one titled A23A.
indulis1 1 year ago
@indulis1 I read it (thanks for that) but I still don't buy it. Climate change is real, I have no illusions about that but I think you should spend more time camped outside the fossil fuel companies HQ's. After all it's them who say it's public demand that drives them but on the other hand they will say that the public gets whatever they give them. You should be there convincing them to give up their greed for profits, complete disregard for human life and environment and to release new tech.
mustanglead 1 year ago
@mustanglead You need to separate the fact of human-caused climate change from what we need to do to fix it/avoid making it worse/cope with it. Unfortunately the number of people running around saying "its not happening" or "it is but it isn't people and fossil fuels" or "it is but it will be good for us" is ensuring NOTHING gets done. Estimates are that the fossil fuel industry makes $4B a year in profits every year action is delayed. That is a big incentive to push against change.
indulis1 1 year ago
@indulis1 As far as I am aware there are plenty of people with plenty of 'fossil fuel' free technology ideas that can never get a patent.. Now that needs to change for one. I need to seperate nothing my friend, we cannot be responsible for the planets in the inner solar system heating up at the same time as well. For sure change has to come but it has to be from the top down not the other way round beacause as you may have noticed we no longer live in a democracy. What you gonna do???
mustanglead 1 year ago
@mustanglead Well the earth's climate has changed in the past due resons like changes in sunlight received etc, so the other planets can also be changing due to other reasons (volcanoes) which is nothing to do with us. The recorded measurements of the amount of sunlight received on the earth over the years say that it is not changing. So that is not causing climate change. Nothings else fits the amount of global heating except CO2, and it fits is pretty much spot on (3C per doubling of CO2).
indulis1 1 year ago
@indulis1 Yeah just another coincidence.. Look I am as concerned about this as much as you are, I have 2 children that I want to grow up in a world that is safe and liveable. I want them to have the facts the truthfull facts, I don't want them to be in debt with the banks until they are 70 which they already are, I don't want them to be part of any phoney wars after some bogus made-up villain, I don't want them to be breathing crap that comes from Stadis-450. We have to all standup now. Lies.
mustanglead 1 year ago
I too am starting to trust RT a bit more, but I always look at the information given for did I have a choice on what information was being given out? Nope. So I fact check what it is I want to know for the day and move on from there.
One thing does get me with all of this fake terrorist tactics of fear is no one has a solution to stop anything, be it global warming or CO2 reduction and a solution does exist. We can stop using oil, coal, and take full control of our own energy needs.
h2opower 1 year ago
I honestly believe we should move to electric cars and find clean energy. But this guy makes a point
PsychiatryExposed 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bilderberg Group.....hunt them and hang them !
kiwisoft 1 year ago
you shutup capitalist man russia good
redline601 1 year ago
global warming is fake!
19t86 1 year ago
@19t86 so well see.
restlys 1 year ago
@19t86 Tell that to the thermometers, satellites, radiosondes, glaciers, seasons, migrating birds, melting ice caps, flood and drought victims, dying species, Pentagon, etc.
They, along with all the expert climatologists, will tell you different.
drkstrong 1 year ago
why has you used mad cow D as an exaple? that was a very real danger, hell, my uncle dead from that by having a blood tranfution by somone who was infected. he doesn't site his sources for his claims on global warming and the clamate gate thing was also shown not to be a scandle and was just media hype (irony much).
killingrang 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
VEUILLEZ NE PAS LIRE CECI. Vous obtiendrez embrassé le vendredi le plus proche possible par l'amour de votre vie. Le demain sera le meilleur jour de votre vie. Cependant, si vous ne signalez pas ce commentaire au moins à 3 videos, vous mourrez dans les 2 jours. Le copy et collent ceci, pour être sauvés ...
extes31 1 year ago
Very true
biruhtes 1 year ago
GW is PR for nuclear power
JonThm 1 year ago
Booker is not a scientist. The only media going berserk in this case are Fox and RT.
Booker is completely and utterly wrong on his assertion that 3rd W countries are being stifled by climate legislation.
Booker has other agendas that appear to be abetted by attacking the science of climate change.
TRUMPHENT 1 year ago
This guy is a moron. Ressources are finite. Our economies are the epitome of all things unsustainable. It's a big casino of pyramid scemes and cheap oil, wasting and destroying the water, the soil, the air, the ressources, the animals. Global warming is an irrelevant, distracting sideshow.
trakkaton 1 year ago
A very small number of scientists believe in AGW, do they?
I sat in a room with over 2000 climate scientists earlier this year - when asked who beieved that
1) global warming was happening
2) It is largely human caused
3) That it is an immediate threat
In the show of hands - there was not one who opposed that view.
In a large anonymous suvey 97% of climate scientists from around the world agreed with those 3 statements.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
They would wouldn't they.
No climate warming - no job !
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz "No climate warming - no job ! " is one of the biggest falicies. Most of the climate scientists in the US are government scientists - they cant be fired and so they have a job no matter what they conclude. Many academic climatologists are tenured professors - their salary is paid by the college. Other countires have different systems even more independent of their conclusions.
Most $s in US climate sience go to aerospace companies & paying for graduate student salaries & travel.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
Of course they WILL be fired if they don't toe the official anthropomorghic global warming line.
Check out our British Brainwashing Corporation weather reporters for example.
They are not weather men any more, but Global/ Climatology experts who cannot even get their forecasts right any more because the Chemsprayers keep messing the weather up on us !
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz You may not want to believe it but it is true. In the US a government employee cannot be fired or reassigned unless there is proof of an illegal act. During the Bush administration AGW was not the official line and several agencies were instructed to muzzle their scientists on the issue but the scientists ignored the orders and kept on telling the truth - as a result Bush cut their funding but was frustrated that he was unable to fire them. They tried to go after Jim Hansen but failed.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
So you are telling me -
They stayed in the same job, making the same statements ???
.
If they still are - then why do we not hear from them ?
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz We do. NOAA puts out a monthly report on climate. There is the NOAA climate prediction center in Suitland Maryland about 10 minutes round the Beltway from where I live and another in Boulder plus the region centers - they all put out regular reports and publish papers about their work. NASA has several active climate groups - the biggest at NASA Goddard (where I work) it has the wing of one huge building to itself. NSF also supports climate groups - primarily NCAR who write lots of papers
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
So they publically stating that there is no anthropomorphic global warming ?
( Which is my original point ! )
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz No they are publically stating there is. My point is that they have no axe to grind. They have their jobs, they have their assignment no matter what conclusion they come to so their political bosses have no way to pressure them (either way). Attempts be the Bush administration to control their statements backfired and got several Bush appointees fired. If Obama is stupid enough to do the same thing his people would suffer the same fate. Politicians now know it is hands off the science.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
you wrote "they have their assignment"
Exactly,
and the science *fail* this video relates to
includes Climate data
which has never been proven adequate, and/or
has also been irreversibly corrupted or deleted.
Who checks the data ?????
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz For goodness sake you are seeing conspiracies where ther are none. Who checks the data? Other independent groups - there are several world wide that do this analysis and they come up with basically the same results even using different analysis techniques and combinations of the data
No data has been erased. You can request all that original data from the various national weather services. Much of it is on the NOAA NCDC website in its raw and processed form, you can request the codes
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
Goodness or conspiracies have nothing to do with this;
Only Facts - so check out
wnd com pageId=119745
timesonline co uk article6936328
climateaudit org erases-data
abovetopsecret com thread528645
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz I tried all of them - none of them worked
WorldNetDaily is a rightwing conspiracy nut site
The Times is owned by Murdock
Climate audit is run by one of th ebiggest scam artists (McIntyre)
Above top secret makes WND look mainstream
If that is where you get your "facts" then you need some new sources.
I told you where you could get all the data, see how the analysis is done, and request the codes - go try it. Get back to me when you understand a little more about data analysis.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
Stop being so arrogant.
LINKS PLEASE
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz Then stop being so dense. A political blog paid for by the oil industry or owned by fox news is not a releiable source of information.
Google NOAA NCDC and follow the data and services links and climate monitoring.
Journals: Nature, Science, EOS, and anything from the AMS
Society Pronouncements - see the Royal Society, National Academy of sciences, AGU, AMS, and just about any other scientific society. In fact EVERY US science society has now endorsed the AGW theory.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
Please stop being unhelpful, defensive, and offensive.
Please provide links to the data upon which YOU are basing YOUR comments.
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz I just gave you 9 specific places to go. Go to those organizations and search on climate and read what it says. Those are the sources I use plus the NOAA NGDC for the Solar data. If you want to go to the grand daddy of them all though it is 5 years old, Google "IPCC FAR WG1 report" there is over 1000 pages of good hard science there. It'll alter your mind.
I am sorry if you find it offensive but I find it highly offensive for you to be equating political websites with scientific data.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
Please get it through your head that it does not matter what political leanings ANY person or service might have.
We are all susceptible to and thus have concerns about *OUR* Earth's climate and you have no right to judge anyone's understanding by assessing their political background !!!!!
Please provide direct links to the figures you base YOUR comments on.
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz I have the right to mak eth eprofession judgement that their "scientific" data and arguments are half truthsor downright lies. Then ask the question why they do this, the most plausible explanation is that they are following a political agenda or a financial one.
In fact ther was an internal memo released from Exxon laying out such a political strategy to undermine the science and data. They are clearly folowing that strategy
You have the sites, too lazy to use google, your problem
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
I followed your "IPCC FAR WG1 report" link. More please.
TOTALLY INADEQUATE.
It covers only 150 years of temperature measurements.
Worse, it covers CO2 measurements from year 0000.AD, since when it reports CO2 as level until recently - yet FAILS to mention or *explain* the Middle Age warm period circa 1000 years ago.
Too much 'Professional' guidance and statistics have been used here to steer readers away from the REAL TRUTH they fail to address !!!!!
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz That statement shows that you dont want to know the truth just want to spout propagada from Exxon et al.as you have plainly not even looked at the IPCC WG1 report. Chapter 6 is entitled paleoclimatology and section 6.3 (figure 6.1) goes back 600My. Fig 6.3 and associated sections deal with the last 700,000 years. There is a whole section about the holocene (6.5) - the current interglacial - and another on the last 2000y in detail (6.6).
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
The Truth is that you too are obfuscating (like those who wrote the IPCC report) by avoiding responding to the fact that temperatures in the middle ages rose without CO2 being involved, thus PROVING that there is NO DIRECT LINK !
And no need to be offensive by accusing me of being lazy, when you have failed to provide other links for everyone to examine.
Also accusing me of spouting Exxon propaganda - I don't know what you are on about. Did they raise that same point too ?
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz Two Points: 1) The temperatures rose in the middle ages in W. Europe and E. US and nowhere else. 2) You make the incorrect assumption that one result (inceasing temperatures) can only be caused by one effect when it can be caused by many (orbital shifts, solar activity, GHGs, shifts in ocean currents, El Nino, etc)
The trick is to sort out which one - that requries data to confirm the most likely cause and refute the ones that dont fit. That is why AGW is the only viable one left.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@z1zaz The reason why I say you are spouting Exxon propaganda is that 3 of the 4 the sources you claimed to trust are funded by Exxon. The other was owned by Fox.
PS in case you did not know that YouTUbe does not allow you to post links to other sites. So instead of scrambling it to avoid the rule that we all signed up to adhere to which is a royal pain I gave you a simple google search item that would take you right there for all this. You have all you need - use it.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
Well I am not spouting Exxon propaganda, and I did not know they made the same point - being that past temperature changes were independent of CO2, thus CO2 cannot be stated as being causative of temperarure change.
Yes, as *therrydicule* clarifies, of course man can and IS creating climate change, and the longer that our twitter-head politicians leave our planet without replacing the healing tree population we long ago consumed, then the quicker we, and the planet, will DIE !
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz "being that past temperature changes were independent of CO2, thus CO2 cannot be stated as being causative of temperarure change." That statement is Exxon funded propaganda as it simply is NOT true.
If you mean the ice core data - the warming was initiated by changes in the Earth's orbit but the resulting change in solar input was way too small to account for the observed temperature changes - it is the increase in GHGs that resulted from that initial warm up that mostly caused it
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
Do you know if the figure for polar ice reflection is constant or have they changed it over say the past 50 years.
Once upon a time - glaciers were snow white icy mirrors, now they are dark like gutter slush.
Has this been taken into account ?
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz Actually I dont have the foggiest idea. Albedo is a knotty problem. I am away from NASA GSFC at a conference, I'll ask one of the Earth Scientists when I get home.
My guess (I stress GUESS) is that the surface area of glaciers are so small that from a global temperature perspective they wont make much difference. There was something in a journal I read that talked about black carbon aerosols darkening snow which might be a larger problem.
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
And now that we overtaxed minions have clean oil burning motors where do all the particulates come from -
burning tropical forests
burning coal
industry, including oil refineries
We are already past a tipping point, with idiotic Chemtrailing making it worse by modifying weather patterns which now cool temperate regions but warm the poles
We need global tree planting and ban on clearing PDQ
Plus World legislated Family Planning, forgotten about since I was a student !
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz The particles (aerosols) mostly come from burning of coal and they help cool the planet on balance (they also cause many of the breathing ailments we suffer from). Oil is the 2nd worse polluter after coal.
Tree planting will help a tiny bit. You would have to cover most to the planet's arable land with trees to offset US emissions alone.
There are multiple tipping points the longer we go as we are the more we will cross. I agree on family planning but it will never happen here (US)
drkstrong 1 year ago
@drkstrong
ARABLE land is a fraction of the Earth's surface, the rest must be planted and managed - plenty jobs there !
Family planning MUST happen, and is organisable, but there has been a refusal by Politicians to sort this out - other than by planet polluting wars, harmful Chemtrail and vaccination activities etc
Truth - Children born not decreasing per couple not of increased age, thus human heating has already increased beyond a straight line effect.
Lies - 'CO2' is the problem !
z1zaz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@z1zaz I was using "arable" in the sense land on which any plants can grow - not the strictly argicultural sense.
Lies - 'CO2' is the problem ! - again you fail to look at the avaiolable facts and rely on fringe sources for your definitive statements
drkstrong 1 year ago
@z1zaz The planet will survive us, some species will evolve... However, we have problems.
The temperature change are not dependent of CO2 but gazes, in many form. What happen is that many activities on earth finish in change in the chemical formation of the atmosphere.
The politician, to be fair, should attack Methane and SF6. Sulfur hexafloride but it is 20 000 times worst than CO2 at equal quantity, but I never heard of it on the news...
therrydicule 1 year ago
@z1zaz The medieval warm period was indeed warmer than some subsequent century, but not as warm as the 20th century ;) Also, this medieval raise was not synchronous, which is the case right now. Therefor, the cause was not only CO2. However, we also get, just after it, the little ice age: suggesting a thermoregulation of anomalies.
You also forget others gazes, such as SO4, which was lower in this period according to Zielinski.
therrydicule 1 year ago
@therrydicule
There you go again. I did not forget SO4.
The subject here is the 'scientifically' stated relationship between CO2 and Global Warming 'hyped' by the media.
Now CO2 relates to Population x Consumption.
If TPTB legislate for CO2 reduction to prevent Global Warming
then their science means that either Consumption must be reduced, or 'Global Scare' the Global population must be reduced.
You said it yourself heating and mini-Ice-age, yet the CO2 levels did not change.
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz Because CO2 is all of climate change?
That the 3 part phenomena you start to get: Many media member misunderstand global warming and will over-simplified, creating the liaison GhG=CO2, and foolishly debate on that. The case is more complex than that (what about CH4, NOx,, HfC SOx, Dms?). This misunderstanding and unwillingness linked to oversimplification create false idioms. Being pedantic, I will tell you that their is a complex relation between human produced gazes and weather.
therrydicule 1 year ago
@therrydicule
Yes, only when scientists admit that they misled politicians re this CO2 hype will our Global environment ever be sorted out.
You mentioned much, but not either the continuing human deforestation of out planet, nor the past particulate pollution coating causing increased polar region melting, and which is presently being exacerbated by Chemtrailing and NASA's three massive high altitude particulsate bombs last year.
WTF are TPTB playing at ?????
z1zaz 1 year ago
@z1zaz The scientists have not exclusively focused on CO2 but all GHGs and aerosols. They have also included other process (volcanoes, solar, ocen currents,...) in the reconstruction of past climates. Again if you read the IPCC report as I advised you would know this.
Thus they have not misled any politicians they have no motive in doing so - in fact it would be financially and scintifically suicidal for them to do so.
drkstrong 1 year ago
excellent interview!
FearISaWMD 1 year ago
The scientific community is using these stupid false scares to distract us from the things we REALLY have to worry about like lyme disease. They think they've got us "stupid non-scientific types" by the balls and they think they are going to get away with it.
1337manofcombat 1 year ago
like mccy d's ... im lovin' it!
awhodatt 1 year ago
This is known as "Problem, Reaction, Soluion" Google it and the "totalitarian tiptoe" understanding them is vital to understanding how we are being manipulated.
UltraOwl 1 year ago 12
@UltraOwl The Hegelian dialectic: thesis versus anti-thesis = synthesis
dustykhan 1 year ago
Christopher is talking sense here, like Lord Monckton does.
The 'Euro' has failed, as indeed would any other attempt at imposing a NWO currency !
z1zaz 1 year ago 2
@z1zaz in the same way that Mr Monckton (he isnt a lord) is not even a scientist.
killingrang 1 year ago
@killingrang
A hereditory Peer is a Lord, whether sitting in the House of Lords or not.
z1zaz 1 year ago
The UN itself is a fraud. I think it should be shut down. Why anyone is still willing to fund it is beyond me. A big waste of time and money like the League of Nations was.
kungfooed 1 year ago 3
Whether we're the cause of global warming or not, it was being exploited for a bunch of political frauds (i.e. carbon taxes, cap n trade, Gore/Blood Inc.). The swine flu is being touted as another fraud that was profited by big pharma. Strange how science is being used this way.
seanboy80 1 year ago
the title equation is a win. i hope some more people understand how this works now because sometimes when a scare gets super hyped by the news, i wonder 'how are so many people so ignorant that they fall for this?!' and then i feel sad from thinking about how gullible people are.
dboy11368 1 year ago 2
Glad to see there's not a surplus of crazy 2012 retards on the comment section.
kenderoth8 1 year ago
Her shirt is too revealing.
TerminalMontage 1 year ago
@TerminalMontage Scaremonger
TheAmazingJimmy 1 year ago
@TerminalMontage How is her shirt too revealing? It doesn't 'reveal' anything. Its barely even a v-cut. Or are you refering to that her wrists and face are exposed? Perhaps you think she should be under a veil and in shackles for commiting the greatest crime of inhumanity, for which God gives no surrender! Being, ... a woman. Stone her!!
Talon21 1 year ago
Great interview!
freesk8 1 year ago 2
Media need to stop interpreting scientific data and come with their own conclusions. Rather they should present the scientific results or give a venue for where viewers can see the scientific results and let the people analyze and interpret it. This will not only lead to false conclusions but give both politicians and more importantly the people that vote them into office to make constructive decisions and notice poor research being done on major issues.
saitohxD 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
But there's no sense of crying over every mistake. You just keep on trying till you run out of cake. And the science gets done and you make a neat gun, for the people who are still alive.
saitohxD 1 year ago
when its found that the scare is false the media is quite, "well lets move on from that" says the media lady... hehe
YES YES PASS MORE LAWS AND TAXES< the politians love scares it always ends ion more laws and more regulation MORE TAXES
So do you think these politians are instigating these scares, to say that they are not involved is ignorant. The politians choses which "EXPERT WITNESS" to put in front of the other officals, and who ever speaks first is right, everyone else must prove them wrong
d3adp001 1 year ago
this is good
TheWilfred007 1 year ago
I love how he chuckles at the very end.
VipericVampire 1 year ago
Media scum allways do the same thing, RT are the only news network i watch now, BBC, ITN, Sky News are all far left idiots.
MarmiteMan4 1 year ago 7
@MarmiteMan4 there is also AlJazeeraEnglish
gthreesix 1 year ago
@MarmiteMan4
Yeah! And f*ck those on the far right as well! :D
rock3tcat 1 year ago
@MarmiteMan4 Don't forget CNN
locolalo1364 1 year ago
@MarmiteMan4 Sky news is right wing so it is you who is the idiot.
poomanonfire 1 year ago
I'm glad that he is at least pretty much saying that Global Warming is a lie. But toward the end he seemed to say that everything would be fine if the whole world was run like the United States is by the Feds? Ha ha ha ha None of what is going on is by chance... It's all by design. And it won't stop till either the people take back their power, or the elite have killed or enslaved us all.
DragonWaveMaster 1 year ago 2
Climate averages are changing, it is observed today.
But I dont believe it is caused by human activity as the only factor. Maybe human activity is not even a major factor.
celljackingjr 1 year ago
Disinfo BS.....thx RT
88arau 1 year ago
Did the mankind turned into Brainless Zombies ? check it out here, very interesting video abou the change of our mind:
watch?v=BGY_fMUQNmo
Mehmet66Yozgat 1 year ago
One serious problem with RT is that it is not a real "independent" station in terms of its views... It just vents out raw hatered of EU and USA... We have such shit stations in USA too but even they don't vent out such hate at a specific part of the world and do provide full coverage and give credit where it's due...
EsotericDesi 1 year ago
@EsotericDesi RT is bias yes, but they are not as bad as the U.S media... RT is a lot more reliable, and tell's the truth way more often then THE U.S MEDIA...
Hkhan23 1 year ago 4
@EsotericDesi "raw hatered" is what you are venting. not RT
slavixtube 1 year ago
Why don't RT interview Vladimir Putin and ask him why he instructed Russian scientists to altar their findings that said CO2 was not causing global warming and change it to support the IPCC?
All I hear from RT is American and EU governments are liars and nothing about Russia, who go along with them. Russia could release satellite images showing the chemtrails, the real data on CO2 and climate change but they don't.
This is all by design, all Governments are controlled by a small few.
CommonSensePeter 1 year ago 54
@CommonSensePeter my 1st thought on RT was 'finally, a station not bound by US media constricts.' Its not about Russia. Maybe Russians could air a station in a foreign country that wont restrict their views as much
gantonk 1 year ago
@gantonk@CommonSensePeter obviously not the US or UK!!
gantonk 1 year ago
@gantonk I still listen to RT, as you are right it's the closest thing to real news we have.
Peace brother, were all in it together.
CommonSensePeter 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter TV is defunct, the internet is the only place to get your news. And may Peace be unto you my brother, for yes we are all in this together, and the quicker people come to realize this, the better chance we will have to survive. Namaste
gantonk 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter Because Putin will shut them down and KILL them if they expose him like that. Guantanamo is a new thing for Americans but in Russia it's business as usual.
russkeller 1 year ago
@russkeller oh another hollywoodiezed zombi here to tell us how scary Russia is.
slavixtube 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter Looks like their media plays the same games that our media in America plays.
mcap52 1 year ago
@mcap52 same cabal in most countries.
TheGoodnessIsGood 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter watch CNN or FOX: There, UE and America are good angels, and Russia is evil shit... Enjoy!
ivanmendoza93 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter: Putin signed Kyoto DESPITE the RAS (Russian Academy of Sciences) insistence that there is no basis for AGW based on CO2 emissions.
You got it the other way around.
The Russians aren't that stupid to follow those accords anyway, and the only 2 reasons why they even signed Kyoto is 1) 1990 base-level, which means that 30% increase in CO2 would look like 20% reduction on paper, AND 2) Kyoto could make Russia the Saudi Arabia of carbon offset trading.
Get your facts straight!
prikhod 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter American and EU governments are liars.
Htogrom 1 year ago
@Htogrom Of course they are, I just wish Putin would call them on the lies and release the satellite images showing the Geo engineering.
CommonSensePeter 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter CO2 is NOT a relevant factor in "global warming." Global warming is not even real. It is an idea to create a "global scare" to try and pass legislation to tax people and maybe more legislation to just perpetuate some sort of opressive measure.
fury350z 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter Yeah, RT seems to play its self as the honest part of the media complex.
tetrahydroscope 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter Because its a NWO agenda and they're all part of it.
enddebtslavery 1 year ago
@enddebtslavery I wish everyone had your ability to see through the deception. Good Call!
Keep educating the people, we are having an impact.
CommonSensePeter 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter People just need to look at things a little more closely and follow the money, if they don't realise by now that the money is the power then theres no hope.
Peace.
enddebtslavery 1 year ago
No 'zombie apocalypse' ?
xxReaverXXCerberusxx 1 year ago
I completely agree with his assesment of the impact of the politicizing of the global warming issue on developing nations. The utter arrogance and gall of the rich western countries when it comes to Africa and parts of Asia is stupifying. Because of the media and a handful of well financed, politically motivated 'scientists' hundreds of thousands if not millions of people will suffer and die. White man always gets his way.
pretorious700 1 year ago
So this guy says that in the EU poorer countries the debt increased because there is no economic govt to control what is done with the money?
The govt themselves ran the deficits, the salaries and programs do not match the amount of money taxed.
Two options. Tax more OR cut spending.
Arranging another govt agency to "control the money expenditures" will fail as it has always failed. Wanna try again?
asperin 1 year ago
AMAZING INTERVIEW, where do we get this guys book! he is such an eloquent speaker, good choice words and thought put into them! the way i likke it!
maidenkid84 1 year ago 3
@maidenkid84 my guess would b Ebay or Amazon lol.
H1N1Conspiracynews 1 year ago
The anglosaxonic terrorist empire need to scare its zombies to control them.
And they are artificially creating these BOOGEYMEN.
igorvasilevsky 1 year ago
its all about the money.
AfroN1nj4 1 year ago 4
does this guy have a book? I would like to read that..
yuriythebest 1 year ago
Very good interview! trillion thumbs up!!!
rsnboy08 1 year ago 4
please interview more people like this guy...good job RT
idontbelieveinDeath 1 year ago 3
I would not call it a science fail but a corporation propaganda.
defiythelie 1 year ago 3
the u.s. is not rich.
killerfilms08 1 year ago
@killerfilms08
the average man is not but it does hold most of the world wealth.
defiythelie 1 year ago
@defiythelie yeah. some corn, huh?
killerfilms08 1 year ago
@killerfilms08
sure it is
SandyBayBoyz 1 year ago
@killerfilms08 even with the economic shit storm we're in now.the u.s. is still wealthier then 95 to 97% of any country on earth..
PlayingGuitarRules 1 year ago
@PlayingGuitarRules corn. There is no wealth, just illusory power and fiat money. What has created all of what we have/had pertaining to wealth: corn, and minor cash crops (corn is one but only because we produce so much of it, but it's virtually the only thing we export besides jobs. We are poor, you'll and all of the rest of us will be forced to witness this eventually.
killerfilms08 1 year ago 2
Im not trying to scare anybody, but I just wanna say be careful about taking regular flu shots, now they just might be filled with the same solution made for swine flu.
Manolo1013 1 year ago
Great interview
1madaboutguitar 1 year ago 2
How do you keep from getting AIDS? "Sit on your ass and keep your mouth shut!"
realpqleur 1 year ago 5
"The Politicians get involved that's the fatal bit"...lol
Thank you Russia Today for your channel and videos i appreciate and like very much.
toomuch108 1 year ago
Look, it's a duck...
greedyfoot 1 year ago
fear is a main weapon used by the new world order.
problem..reaction...solution..
just keep waking others.the truth is marching on!!
love and light.
kev UK
loveisall1000 1 year ago
Good job ! Great news reporting !!
Thankyou RT !
GeofsFilms 1 year ago 4
swine flu oh no.... and people till this day don't say anything about it.. can u say ADD? ahahhahhaha people forget everything... or just say eh and keep living like its ok they scared us.. it was a false flag... lmao... and who knows what was in those vaccines that people got.... the gov says they got couple millions of vaccines in storage just gathering dust lol....what a waste it came from the us then they blame mexico... lol... u see how mexico tourism has gone down... scare tactics
DAALLMIGHTYEYE 1 year ago 4
Thanks RT, good interview and like the Provakator stated below..."The title is worth putting on a t-shirt".
genefire 1 year ago 6
Great interview and the title is worth putting it on t-shirt. Great Job RT.
Provakator 1 year ago 10
Comment removed
ostancrider 1 year ago
Great interview...sexy accent by the young lady
Charmer4856 1 year ago
@Charmer4856 lol you are funny
Fluke30486 1 year ago
I'm waiting for the "study" that states CO2 is created by Al Queda and Osama Bin Laden therefore "global warming" is real and we need more taxes. Hahaha!
CGArtSuccess 1 year ago
Excellent interview. It's always nice to hear the REAL truth on the "climate change" scandal.
Starbat88 1 year ago
sounds like the HIV = AIDS phenomenon...
Th3Wab3 1 year ago
@Th3Wab3 Can you elaborate on that ? I haven't heard of it.
gringodeltoro1 1 year ago
@Th3Wab3 hiv was the very 1st contagion that the general consensus on contagions was not followed and now we have an epidemic. before you say that it is not right to do such things, it is the lesser evil to of have them in colonies when it would have been a few 10's of thousands versus the 25-40 million people that have it now that will undoubtedly continue to spread it around and rot slowly and die from an uncovered sneeze
majikninja07 1 year ago
@Th3Wab3 the facts that weaken the HIV = AIDS causation many. to list a few the gender and age disparities that differ according to region. the fact that different regions use different test which cause results that contradict each other. the research on retrovirus causations and function are inconclusive... AIDS = 30 some diseases many of which are symptoms that are found in peoples who are exposed to fecal contaminated water and malnutrition. the link is dubious...
Th3Wab3 1 year ago
Great interview.
harr77 1 year ago