Added: 3 years ago
From: not2seri0us
Views: 24,253
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (74)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Great video! The more common-sense evidence the merrier.We all know the truth.but what can we do about it? We should let them poor dam Ahabs out of Guantanamo and replace them

    with the US Government Jackals who were really responsible.

  • Anyone know someone who was in one of the planes that allegedly crashed that day?

  • I strongly recommend watching: money as debt, freedom to fascism, ring of power, 911 mysteries, viberation creates form, behold a pale horse, 2012 enigma, Jim Marrs the 4th reich, the polarity matrix field, Graham Hancock - Quest for the Lost Civilization ,Red Ice TV - Episode 4 - Symbolism in Logos, Indigenous Native American Prophecy, Michael Badnarik's Constitution Class 1 of 43, Consuming Kids:The Comercialisation of Children, Fluoride Deception Part 1, Are You a Sovereign Yet...

  • A friend said, out of the 9 supposed hijackers, 6 were found alive. O.0.

  • I seen a special on darpa on natgeo. Towards the end, the spokesman for darpa said they are working on planes that change shape...anyone have the ability to get that video??? I do not have that capability. If someone can look into this, it would help, at least for those using clips to make a point.

  • THE POWERS THAT BE REALLY THINK WE ARE THAT STUPID BUT WE ARE NOT.

  • @lumeriam You're missing the point. The powers that be don't care if we believe it or not as long as they have some fools that are willing to wave the flag so they can hide behind that. Have you noticed that there is a TON of information out there that says this was not as they told us HOWEVER when every you talk to someone that believes the lie all they EVER come up with is about jet fuel, Muslims and "You hate this country" thats all they have.. the fools drank the punch.

  • people can argue about if jet fule weakend the structruel steel all they want. that doesnt even begin to explain the molten steel under all three buildings. if that doesnt prove fowl play then wtf does.

  • There is no way there were people on the planes that hit the towers. They aren't going to leave a bunch of people in a RC plane for an operation like this. Some of the people we are told died in the plane crashes like Raytheon employees are probably not dead so I don't think anyone was on the planes at all in that case.

    If nobody was on a plane that hit the pentagon (since there was no plane at the pentagon) then no one was on the planes that hit the towers. The phone calls are something else

  • From what I have learned, metal will only melt at controlled temps., in a controlled invironment(like an oven). Metal will not melt at low temps. in open air space. People need to do more research before saying jet fuel will melt steel. And besides, one cannot focus on one small point. 9-11 is like a puzzle. You have to have ALL the pieces to put the ugly picture together.

  • They were remote controlled planes with NO PASSENGERS..They were not on any list to fly that day. Has anyone ever come forward to say my friend, wife, husband, pilots, cabin crew was on those planes??? No Airspace security on that day. The buildings lease was due to run expire. Does anyone know that George B JNR's brother in law was head of security for the towers?? The whole thing stinks? And WHERE ARE THE BLACK BOXES ? But an INTACT "Terrorist's" passport was found.. Yeah right - Peace :)

  • @antred11

    Sure pal.

    Bring that heat rises, explain how the heat traveled downward throughout the entire labyrinth of core columns and steel structure. That's the only way for that to happen. Wasn't possible in a million years.

    Don't get suckered in by the official whackjob theory.

  • @lordhewing I am a leader. Where will I lead people? I don't know... I don't have all the answers, but one thing I know about myself, is that I don't wish harm on anyone. If I have to lead someone, it's going to be done peacefully. I believe There is no Way to peace, PEACE IS THE WAY.

  • its infuriating to hear reasoned objections to the official 9/11 story on youtube, but than on the corporate media outlets you get the guy who thinks everyone was taken off the plane, executed in a field, and put back on the plane only to have it used as a murder weapon. why not have this guy on fox or msnbc

  • The former USAF pilot is correct and it has ben proven beyond a doubt by several Professional Pilot Associations, the aircraft COULD NOT have performed the flight profile into the Pentagon.

    The assertion that a guy w/ a 172 background could fly (hold it level) a 767/77 is laughable.

    To assert that this clown then flew a flight profile that EXCEEDS the A/C tolerance levels is pure insanity.

    Thanks for the clip.

  • well when you look closer,both of the planes that hit the towers were remote, and had a target remote to hit, I.E. look at the offices they hit"do your home work here" Pictures show attennas on both of the planes"again homework time" So when so called demolationist say that the thermite would have gone off premature, not if it was wired around the point where the knew the planes were comeing in.

  • not2seri0us I am currently training to be an airline pilot and I can 110% verify what this man has said. The only way I can describe the difference between the two aircraft's systems is like riding a bike and then trying to drive a stick shift.

  • When they filmed an intentional crash landing of a 757 on disc channel (Im sure you've all seen it) they used RC controls to steer it. I bet thats what they did. Every plane went off the radar for a moment before turning around for their intended targets. My question is what happend to the original planes and the people on them? Sent to mars as food for the reptillians? LOL JK but seriously...what happend to them?

  • I do believe planes hit the towers with the people inside...I'm just not sure how it was done (your probably right about the RC controls). Now....the pentagon story is BS, that wasn't a plane.  I think Dub-ya knew it was going to happen and helped out in every way possible..."thermite" He needed a reason to go to war.

  • @not2seri0us AWACS TECHNOLOGY...

  • @not2seri0us

    watch the september clues.

    There where no planes. Fox, CNN and ABC did send out actors to tell about "commercial" planes.

    in september clues they show you how silly they faked every single impact video.

  • They hit into the towers.

  • @TaTaTaTaTodayJr Everyone here needs to see the lone gunman.s first episode showing Rc airlines flying into the world trade center prior to 911. It is a smoking gun.

  • @TaTaTaTaTodayJr well think they either were made up as part of their evil plan

    or if they in fact exist were given loads of money to never divulge or even they were assassinated

    so no witnesses .

  • @TaTaTaTaTodayJr Im not so sure, RC flying a drone is one thing, but a 500mph jet seems a bit difficult. Still not convinced commercial jets were used, but that is not the issue at this juncture. The truth lies with the hard evidence we do have of controlled demolition for WTC1 WTC2 and WTC7.

  • @TaTaTaTaTodayJr Made deals with the government that they and their families would be safe when shit hits the fan with martial law and everything and taken financially care of until then. Of course, that's not gonna happen anyway, and I'll laugh when they all get shafted.

  • Allow me to point out 1 more thing,the planes both flew perfectly smooth into both towers without any hint of error.but how can someone perfect this who have never done it before? even the best trained pilots would have trouble doing this if possible,they even say so themselves,but 2 planes into 2 targets from 2 different individuals so easily? come on now people.

  • 3 Steel buildings fell from fire damage for the 1st time in history,on the same day less then 3 hours from each other in the same area.Someone get the guinness book of world records here,this tops all records.Based on this alone I'd start thinking.Now to top it off,Meridian plaza in Philadelphia burned for 19 hours and NEVER fell.The towers burned for less then 3.one that wasn't hit fell and the top of one fell off onto building 4 so what force did it have to collapse vertically on itself.

  • All of that said, let's put YOU in control.if you were going to sit down and plan the largest mass/murder, inside job/cover-up in world history and were goign to air it LIVE globally, wouldn't you have ironed out those major details to avoid exposure? Why use a fake plane when your killing so many anyway? Use a real plane and get away with it. Just doesn't add up for me. Not saying nothing should ever be questioned about that day, but there were planes, period.

  • Oh in all fairness I understand,and I'm not really saying the planes were fake or "not existent" what I'm saying is a lot of things don't add up to it being just terrorist from the middle east using planes and that's it. And also,you can't iron out certain things,they pretty much have an explanation for every detail,most of us just don't believe it,and some of our speculation is supported by evidence. You can't MAKE everything work exactly as planned all the time.

  • I respect where your coming from man. I didn't want to attack you just giving another way look at it.

  • Didn't seem like you attacked me,just debating a topic.I've looked this over,I'm not those guys who just try and support his own claim and not look at the other mans too.There's some pieces to the story that don't fit right.I pretty much look at every possibility and see which one is more likely,who had most to gain,what is it and why,because in any situation someone's looking to gain something,the why is what drives them.

  • It's also suspicious how they just want to shut anyone up who talks about it.Since the date of when it happened more then 65% of people want a new investigation of it. You can't even bring this up in as a possibility to them or someone would say "Crazy,or YOU CONSPIRACY THEORIST" or take you out of the area.If there's nothing to hide,just start a new investigation.

  • Yes people do want a new investigation, if there is an alternate truth I would like to know as well. However, the same people want better medical care, lower taxes, a better economy, etc, so you will have to choose between those things or a new investigation of seemingly radical claims that would cost a ton of money in an already down economy (monitarily). Why don't some of you guys foot the bill instead of all tax-payers if you care so deeply and are so sure your claims are correct?

  • Ok,so a new investigation would cost millions and that's a problem but sending a rocket to the moon to find water recently that cost $849 billion was ok? or building a new stadium fro sports that cost 12 million is fine right?  There's no excuse not to do a new investigation when they can throw money at things that aren't important. As far as the economy,it's also these spending's that got us here in the first place,it wasn't us.

  • If I may here, Its been said that if the goverment allowed for a investigation, there are private donors that are going to pay for it, so there would be no taxes or goverment spending on it at all but we need the power to investigate it, given by those we elect to power

  • Good luck with that! They will NOT reopen the investigation....to many would be caught red handed! We may get it opened back up in another 50 years after everyone involved is dead and gone.

  • pretty much, 50 years after no one really cares and history is history, then the cycle starts anew, thats what happens. The people our age will see it on a television special and the same ole same ole will happen, conspiracy theorist etc etc believe ect ect. Most likely it'll never be reopened or so long from now people won't care anymore. History does repeat itself.

  • Sad but true.....

  • Yea, by the way thanks for posting vids, anyone who does it for the sake of information and awareness deserves respect and be acknowledged.

  • @Shadowlooker12 You must be CIA ,,people still care ,, and justice will rain

  • @npf2135 Are you trolling me or something? I'm not CIA, and even though I could be lying to you you'd have to discern that for yourself. Either way, I think you misinterpreted my comment, I was stating what will happen and has happened already when truth is shown on T.V or a video. People just disregard it and tend to brush it off as "History" rather then looking into it and finding out what happened, they show you it and say nonsense and we all nod in agreement.

  • @Shadowlooker12 because there was a foreign attack on american soil fifty years before the japanese bombed pearl harbor?

  • I like to think "Never say never". More and more people believe 9/11 was an inside job. Some of those people KNOW it was an inside job because thy are stronger willed free thinkers. It is so outrages that it may spark a revolution. Not a chaotic and violent one I hope, for that would backfire, But one that removes people from office, seizes the records and appoints new courts in a peaceful but adamant and emphatic manner. However there are many other issues to address. Who among you are leaders?

  • @LordHewing

    A REVOLUTION IS A BRILLIANT IDEA! WHO ORGANIZES THESE THINGS ANYWAY? A grass roots movement would be seen as terrorists I'm sure. The media would blacklist any legitimate grass roots revolution. I FOR ONE WOULD SUPPORT IT! But it would look like asymmetric warfare. We'd have to execute senators and misleaders, collaborators. Use hit and run tactics. Sniper attacks on authorities etc. Radical Islamic model of war without the Islam. WAR OR JUSTICE. THEY CHOOSE! INSIDE JOB.

  • i agree with you there

  • @not2seri0us - It may be reopened, and like the people during the JFK assassination, we will all be dead before the truth comes out. Maybe our grandchildren will know the facts?

  • @not2seri0us People power is the only way to reopen the 911 case.

    But without it exactly what you said will happen.

    The assassination Of J F Kennedy is a good example.

    People in power will always get away with this sort of thing, because the public are too scared to think what would happen if the government was brought down leaving the country vulnerable. Then what is the alternative? A different government that would do the same, tic tac toe, the public can never succeed.

  • No, we just need a SERIOUS truth movement and force them to be investigated.

  • And your trying to classify people,what do you mean by "some of you guys".We are the same people your talking about.We have tax problems,bill problems,debt problems,health care problems just like the rest. "Instead of the tax payers" ??? Tax is what got us here,debt is what got us here,We didn't tax ourselves and make deliberate debt.We already have independent people doing investigations any how,so "Foot the bill" yes,but it's far more effective for the government to do it.

  • I never said you guys didnt have to pay bills,etc. I'm just saying there are always trade-offs. Sports are state founded and space programs have always been a high priority for some reason. Sports venues could also be blocked if fans don't want them like with the Brooklyn arena. If a new investigation is done ALL tax payers will be paying for it. The "you guys" comment just meant solely the believers of conspiracy should pay for the investigation if they are so certain they are correct.

  • Understandable, but what message does that send to the public. A rocket and a stadium is more important in a free society then it is the thought that there might be something we are not getting told. Taxes are already being waved left and right,economic blows are being dealt already every where. You can't ask a few people to pay something that would be difficult to pay to begin with and if the main source has the resources and the time why not. Why make people with limited resources do it.

  • Plus,again,there are already independent investigators on this subject,it just makes it extremely difficult when they main source is holding all the cards and want hush hush about it.If there's nothing to hide why whisk people away when they ask about it.Why shut up the public who want a new investigation,why outcast people into groups which automatically get the title of "Crazy" being Conspiracy theorist,why classify only 80% of a document needed to be read on the subject.

  • Well I don't shut either side out or call either side crazy. I try to be objective and question both sides. Your right in saying that people just attack each other, especially on here. Look its a good thing th ecountry still has people able to question things. But it loses a little impact when certain people question anything. Being called "crazy" would only make me want to prove people wrong even more. So it should fuel theorists to pay to have the events investigated thoroughly even more so.

  • If there's nothing to hide,let people who are doing there own research do it and stop suppressing it.and stop downplaying those interested in the topic. It's no endeavor to sit and talk about it,especially with people who consider themselves very intelligent and understanding,but this is rarely done.

  • Even when a fact about it is brought up,it's not shown or heard unless you dig pass the surface.Common folk would know nothing of it.Simply,do a thorough job and let things be asked.

  • whether you want to believe conspiracy or not, the simple fact is that what the US Government told people what happened that day does not stack up againt the evidence.

    They were not airliners that went into the buildings, the one that went down in the field allegedly made a hole that existed five years earlier (check maps). They found the terrorists passports (in the rubble) and knew all their names in 12 hours flat (despite the fact that some of them are still alive?).

  • Great comment.

  • Please..don't be so damn stupid! Watch the news...lol! Watch: BREAKING NEWS!!!!4/6/09 We Told You So! Wake Up America! Pt. 1

  • 9/11 was a inside job.....I'm not saying that there wasn't any planes or anything like that, but Bush was fully aware it was going to happen and did nothing to stop it...if you don't believe that....well...your in the minority friend...watch my Bush administration commits treason video...then tell me he didn't know! There was a big profit for G.W. and a whole bunch of other people ex. insurance policies , war, oil....do I need to go any further..like I said..watch my video & then we'll talk.

  • when you find that ingorance is not bliss and look for yourself you you you will find inside job

  • the truth must hurt look at we know the truth 911

  • I can't find it .....are you sure that's what it's called??

  • i agree with you and this old man is an inside job to get ppls attention on someone who probably cant finde wife.. btw there is something that eaven i can do on Army FS like that turn .. no fucking electronics needed.. just a 2 hands and a luck..

  • 911 was a government project. It is well known that the U.S military was set to conduct a "simulated terrorist attack" on September 11 2008. It is ALSO well known that very valuable documents were removed from a secure location in the basement of one of the towers shortly before the crash. Also, if you watch the video of the first crash, you'll see a flash just BEFORE the plane hits. Also, Jet fuel does NOT burn hot enough to melt steel. This was a government setup.

  • I SOOOOO believe 9/11 was a inside job. There are just to many things that don't add up but then again I believe in the NWO or something like it. I think it was a scare tactic to start the war, start up the RFID chip etc. Its all about control.(that's just my opinion)

  • Watch the news you retarded buffoon! BREAKING NEWS!!!!4/6/09 We Told You So! Wake Up America! Pt. 1

  • you stupid halfwit jet fuel can't melt steel lmao at your stupid ass........

  • at teh teMpreature o f jet fuel steel loses 90% of its tensile stRength.. Wathc the Steel News BRAKInG NEWS

  • @jasonmildward No, but it can weaken the structure enough for it to no longer be able to support its own weight.

  • @antred11

    How could the few top floors weaken the structure at the bottom (in both towers AND WTC7??) You are a hateful criminal, and should not live in this country if you support domestic terrorism! Scrub.

  • blinde fagots... u see what u want to

  • I assume you mean "Proven" but I'd like to see the material specifications. My mechanical engineering background tells me steel with a melting point above 2,500 F cannot melt in jet fuel with a peak flame of less than 1,000 F.

    It would be like trying to melt gold with a cigarette lighter. It won't happen. Get your science classes straight man.

  • Great comment! Some people just refuse to accept anything that isn't spoon fed to them by their government.

  • @shigatsuningen your "mechanical engineering background" seems a little fraudulent then, considering that jet fuel ignited in open air generally gets hotter than 700C (it is assumed to have reached 850C plus), and the grade of steel used in the tower softens at 450C and loses half its structural integrity at 650, more than enough to explain both collapses. i am directly quoting NIST here, by the way.

  • @shigatsuningen your my hero for that post! lol..

  • @shigatsuningen theyr talking about planes in 2001 not now! obviously back then it was more obsolete and would

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more