So even if trade could benefit the poor, we should not engage in it because the rich would benefit as well? What further proof do we need that Marxism is not motivated as much by concern for the poor, it is motivated by envy of the rich.
Ricardo's model is static and concerned with the current condition, while Marx's offers a long-term perspective as well. Interesting analysis. I don't think anyone would deny that the benefits of international trade are unequally distributed among the various trading partners. Some benefit more than others. It's inherently true.
Why should the gap be of serious concern? Why do people have to benefit equally?
dombon6 10 months ago
So even if trade could benefit the poor, we should not engage in it because the rich would benefit as well? What further proof do we need that Marxism is not motivated as much by concern for the poor, it is motivated by envy of the rich.
FatherBrain 11 months ago
Ricardo's model is static and concerned with the current condition, while Marx's offers a long-term perspective as well. Interesting analysis. I don't think anyone would deny that the benefits of international trade are unequally distributed among the various trading partners. Some benefit more than others. It's inherently true.
wamonchez 2 years ago
It is better if we are all equally poor than if we are unequal. Is what I took from this.
benjamaiLL 2 years ago 2
Thank you for reminding me how horrible Marx's logic was.
Questfortruth86 3 years ago