Re: How hard can it be to be ThePreacher84040?

[trassiepower]

this fool found a religion to fill up the gaps in his head 

[TheBekigan]

hahaha....you're right, you're my idol preacher of the word of God' hehe

[kleerfew]

elloooooooooooo, prrreeechahhh fromm da fillipinnnnnsss!!! ha ha ha ha ha!!!!

[Diosibundo]

HHAHHAHHHAHHAHHA!!!!!!!!!!!!

No one can out Pinoy Pino the Preacher!

[domains33]

blasphemer of god?

person of loud voices preaches against soul.

your a nut... get help.

[Aerisselicious]

HELL is waiting for you, all you atheists, mockers, blasphemers, unbelivers.....

[gronkar66]

This is poetry. The beauty of his voice alone moves me to tears.

[windham666]

preacher i give you 5 stars for this video this iss excellent, too bad you suck!

[ThePreacher84040EX]

windham666! You fail! You are a man/woman of SATAN!

[windham666]

romaNS CHAPTER 4:20 BONG HITs for preacher84040

[GnosticAtheist]

Is this person real? Nope. He can't be.

[pchannell]

If god can do anything, then he can send me to heaven if he wants to. You said that Roland. You said that god can do anything so therefore he can send me to heaven. He doesn't need to wait for me to love him. I'll never love god, but that doesn't matter because you say that he loves me, and that means that he'll send me to heaven.

See you in heaven Roland.

[MoosePiano]

You go on about your mansions and heavenly crowns and in the next sentence you call US materialistic. I think another video is in order...

[MoosePiano]

If it didn't affect you, preacher, you wouldn't be making this video response. You, sir, are an idiot.

[KeithTruth]

Good video brother preacher. Such passion.

God Bless you.

These atheists are just evil little animals.

[ChoofMonster]

Nobody is born with religious knowledge, making atheism (arguably agnosticism) the default for everyone at birth.

It is 'evil' to attempt to change someone else's religion (or lack thereof), because it assumes superiority.

Roland tells people who don't believe in Hell that they are going there, which is more amusing than scary for atheists.

[KeithTruth]

choof,

Every civilization had a belief about some kind of creator because of a the obviouse. There is no evidence atheism is a default position infact when the brain developes, is when you would have to take the survey logicaly.

You are making moral judgments but how does atheism account for objective moral truths like evil and good? Why should you care what I do if what I say is just the result of random chemical proccess? In the atheist world view objective moral values are just opinion.

[ChoofMonster]

Atheists still have values, they are more likely to be derived from logic based on observation and experience than through belief in a 'higher power'.

The only moral judgment I made was that proselytization is potentially 'evil', depending on who the target is (eg, it's a lot worse for Jews than atheists because atheism is not a religion that can be destroyed through a change of beliefs).

[KeithTruth]

If God does not exist than objective moral values do not exist. Atheists have values yes but if there is no God then they are subjective and no one has the real right to say that raping a child is wrong in the atheist view because there is no set standard. If one atheist says it's ok and that is his valid subjective moral opinion why don't you shake his hand and say "Ok that is true. Raping children is subjectively imoral so go ahead"?

[ChoofMonster]

Sexual molestation is known to harm children for life, it is obviously "wrong" even without theological justification. Priests, rabbis and imams rape children, despite intricate knowledge of their respective religions.

The bible says that homosexual acts are wrong, but as a heterosexual I already know that it's wrong for me anyway. The bible was implemented in order to maintain social cohesion in a time of anarchy, many of its moral values are based on common sense.

[KeithTruth]

You can't even comprehend what I am saying to you.

Molestation is wrong even if the child isn't mentally harmed later but, if values and moral truths are just subjective and not objective than in the atheist world view raping a child isn't really wrong it is just subjectively wrong to you because you said so. But that says aboslutely nothing of it actually being really wrong. It would be fine then if another atheist said it was right because it is subjective. Preists are a red herring.

[ChoofMonster]

There is no Abrahamic scripture (outside of Jewish oral law) which specifically states that sex with children is wrong, and even then it just says that the child is still considered a "virgin" because the sex was non-consensual. In biblical times, people married in their early teens or younger.

The example of pedophile priests is to show that theological understanding does not necessarily control behavior.

[KeithTruth]

You can't refute my argument choof so all you can do is attack red herrings.

[KeithTruth]

Looking back, the majority of sane people know the holocaust was wrong for a reason. But let's say the nazis won ww2 and brainwashed the world to think it was right. It would still be objectively wrong would it not? There is something objective within people that persuades us that it was so horrible and evil. But in the athist world view, if Hitler won and brainwashed everyone since it wasn't objecticly wrong, there would be nothing wrong with accepting it is moral because of society.Understand?

[pchannell]

Keith,

In the christian world view Hitler is in heaven now because he was a christian. So much for god's morality.

[KeithTruth]

Sorry pchannell you are wrong.

"The heaviest blow which ever struck humanity was Christianity; Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew."

- Adolf Hitler,

(Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, trans., (Oxford, 1953), "Hitler's Table-Talk", p. 7)

[ChoofMonster]

The Third Reich used propaganda to convince the German people that Jews were inferior and to justify genocide. It is still objectively wrong to massacre people, even if Hitler or some other dictator says it's OK.

The Nazis were not atheists, the majority in the hierarchy were Odinists and occultists with a grounding in Lutheranism (Hitler himself was Catholic).

[KeithTruth]

Hitler studied Blavatsky's satanic occult material of the arian race, astrology, and he hated Christianity. He pretende dto be a catholic to gain support just like Bush pretends to be a Christian.

"The heaviest blow which ever struck humanity was Christianity; Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew."

- Adolf Hitler

(Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, trans., (Oxford, 1953), Hitler's Table-Talk, p. 7)

[ChoofMonster]

Hitler was wrong about many things, but he managed to control what people read and heard; without any evidence to the contrary, his subjects believed him.

The holocaust followed centuries of persecution and Antisemitism in Europe, mostly due to the Christian belief that Jews were evil for rejecting (or killing) Jesus, in addition to various myths and canards related to Judaism which had no basis in reality.

[KeithTruth]

It was the vatican that said Jews killed Jesus and there is no evidence that is what drove hitler. The catholics recently took back that the Jews killed Jesus and Hitler got his inspiration from Blavatsky's work on arians and occultism about an enlightened one world government with a perfect race.

Christians were also killed by Hitler don't forget. The German people were decieved by him not Christians. The vatican is a monster that says it's Christian but is not.

[ChoofMonster]

The Vatican only apologized for the deicide charge in 1964 with Nostra Aetate. It keeps changing its own rules to suit itself, and still exerts political influence because it is a country (Holy See) as well as a religious institution.

Antisemitism was already widespread, Hitler didn't need to do a lot of convincing.

[KeithTruth]

I think you mean 1918- "Bolshevism". There was a widespread belief that Jews were Communists. Until 1933 Germany was regarded as a country where antiSemitism was not particularly strong.

So your assessment is basically false from the beginning. You will try and pin everything on Christianity I see. Hitler did a lot of convincing and the Vatican although evil was not responsible for the antisemitism in Germany or the rest of Europe as a whole.

[ChoofMonster]

Bolshevism was not a "Jewish" movement (Bolsheviks rejected all religion), there were some Jews in high-ranking positions but essentially they were attempting to enforce atheism. The Russian Revolution led to many Jews leaving their homelands to escape persecution. In Germany, it started gradually and most of the camps were in countries which didn't care about their Jewish populations. Not entirely the fault of Christianity, but it was a catalyst.

[KeithTruth]

That is true but that is where the "jews taking over the world" rhetoric stems from no? The idea that all Jews were Bolshevists. Hitler trumped up these charges and wrote about them.

[ChoofMonster]

The "Jews taking over the world" myth stems from Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, when the only work available to Jews was money-lending, as a result of which many prospered financially. Hitler simply capitalized on this, as did Martin Luther many centuries before him.

[KeithTruth]

So now we learn it wasn't because the Vatican blamed the Jews for Jesus' death.

Anyway I concede your point, but how did Luther capitalize on this?

[ChoofMonster]

There were many factors involved, but what allowed Luther to capitalize on Antisemitism was the fact that it was already widespread amongst the Catholics he converted.

The Vatican itself never officially leveled a deicide charge against the Jews, but many priests and Catholics did so of their own volition.

[KeithTruth]

Sounds shody to me. What does catholics being anti-semetic who were later converted, have to do with Luther capitalizing?

In what sense did he capitalize?

[ChoofMonster]

The sentiment was already there, he just increased its momentum through his writings such as "On the Jews and Their Lies" in addition to his many sermons aimed at scapegoating Jews. Many of his writings were republished as "fact" in Nazi Germany.

[KeithTruth]

At first Luther wanted to convert Jews and was concerned for them so I disagree with your contention about him capitalizing on anti-semitism because of prior belief by some catholics. It wasn't until later in his life that he started his anti-jewish remarks and works.

[ChoofMonster]

Bush pretends to be "Christian" because it is common knowledge that most Americans will not vote for an atheist (surveys show about 50% would reject a candidate for this reason alone). Muslims and homosexuals also have no hope of being elected to top positions.

America now has a 'black' president, even 30 years ago this also would have been impossible.

[KeithTruth]

Yes, just like how Hitler decieved his soldiers that they were doing Gods will by putting symbols on their gear etc..

The fact is Hitler was really very anti-Christian, anti-religion and pro-occult luciferianism.

You probably won't believe me but so is bush. I wrote an article on it on my website.

[ChoofMonster]

That Bush is not a Christian is quite obvious; he panders to evangelical fundamentalists for the sake of political expediency. Neither his social policies nor his warmongering behavior are reminiscent of the teachings of Jesus.

His association with "Skull and Bones" was also for political purposes.

[pchannell]

Keith,

explain this to me: you say that there is one objective moral truth, and yet there are many different religions and they have different "objective" moral truths. For example, in Islam, Muhammad married a 9 year old girl. Does that count as child raping? Is that wrong? But how could it be? god told him to! The source of all morality said it was O.K., so I guess it is, right? How can his objective moral truth be any less objective or true than yours?

[KeithTruth]

pchannell We can recognize objective moral values, all of us but just because something is objectively wrong and shouldn't be done, that doesn't mean people are zombies who can't go against that truth in defiance.

The point is if God doesn't exist, then objective moral values do not exist and anything is ok because morality is subjective. That belief is spreading among secular countries, that is why europe and the US are decaying slowly moral wise.

[ChoofMonster]

The original version of the bible, written in Hebrew, does not distinguish between "Heaven" and the Garden of Eden. Essentially, they are the same thing.

That is why "original sin" only applied to its initial transgressors, Adam and Eve. Their descendants are innocent.

[eternalundylnglove]

mansions and gold in heaven?

does heaven have a stock market?

[CoolAtheist]

lmao@ 3:35

[Jacena]

Careful preacher, you're coughing a bit at 5:16 or so -- maybe you should take something for that ~

[Jacena]

STEEEEIIINK  BAAAMBS!

GAAAHD!!

[riversonthemoon]

At the end, did you just tell Jesus to repent?

[riversonthemoon]

pchannel is perhaps wasting his time. He is too late. You are already insane. Do you remember what I told you about social skills? Did you bother to compare yourself to sane people? Even someone who lives in deep denial, like you, should be able to notice the wide disparity.

Seek help now.

[riversonthemoon]

Haven't finished watching yet. But at around 2 minutes, you describe all the mansions, gold streets (where does one have to go in heaven?) and CROWNS. Then you go on to charge MoosePiano with being 'materialistic'. How does your brain work Roland? So you are being a good Christian for the payoff your going to get in heaven? Haha. Atheists can be good for the sake of being good. We don't need to confuse morality by reward and punishment. Your moral sense is that of a 5 year old. Grow up, Pastor!

[corvardus]

If god has limits on love, then God is necessarily an evil god. That is the nature of infinity, Roland.

God in your belief system needs to be all loving with no limits or criteria on his love, enough to even penetrate the bowels of hell. If God's love can penetrate the bowels of hell, he can save me, he can offer me salvation.

Anything that calls itself God and not do this is an aspect of Satan. Your God, Roland, is an aspect of satan, and you are worshipping a false god. Enjoy hell, Roland.

[corvardus]

Roland, that reading STILL doesn't say that you can't get saved in hell. It is simply warning if you can't ask forgiveness of God you would be burning in hell forever. Not that the punishment is forever. Thanks for confirming that. Blaspheme god until death. Get proof of the after life, repent, then go to heaven!

[Grayfox55]

Jesus was a male prostitute.

[Raphmattic]

Why are you so fool? The Preaching of the cross...the preaching of GOD or anything to do about heaven is just foolishness to all of you. MOCKERS..BLASPHEMERS BEFORE GOD...SHAME ON YOU!!!SHAME ON YOU!!!!! THE BIBLE SAYS SO!!!!

[Raphmattic]

I have a question....WHERE IS HEAVEN LOCATED?

[BZ987654]

In Roland's brain, which is long fried from the years of anal intake of street drugs.

[BZ987654]

Your god is a bitch preacher. Admit it

[Raphmattic]

second

[BZ987654]

First