The Blue LED's makes the already modern Jag Interior, even more modern and unlike tuned up ricers with neons, it ain't overdone. Just right and elegant. Everybody(luxury car manufacturers) is doing it.
@capitalsho There are many many cues of a jaguar. This car was based off of the Jaguar XJ6. If you pay attention, you will see that the grille is very simmilar, the long low and wide profile remains, the shaped hood that is always on a Jaguar, The overall shape is simmilar to my XJR, the very small C pillar. It takes a good eye to spot them, but they are there.
Fantastic, love the front, the interior and the engines BUT without the blacked out rear pillars this would look like a hatch back, the designers obviously couldn't resolve certain issues with the rear end, so sad!
i have some issues with the exterior. I'm not a big fan of the front grill. It looks to pimp for a jaguar. It's too big and also there's a weird line in the back side of the car where the rear window meats the booth (luggage w/e it's call). positive: the interior i love it.
@jagiersuarez15 The grille is styled after the XJ6 SIII. And the line in the back, makes it flow. I noticed that too, and was not sure if I liked it or not, but when I saw it in person, it just makes it seamless. It flows in one continuous line, wich is elegant
And knowing Jaguar's reputation for luxury (especially ride comfort), I soon think (although i reserve judgement) that this could be the best car in the world
Is that, no one of the people that made those comments can really buy this jaguar, so enjoy your old cheap cars and say whatever you want about this jag, because you are going to be on your crap for a very long time, and the people that said that they have a jag, and this is not jaguar, i could bet that is REALLY REALLY OLD.
LOL where did you EVER see a mondeo in this car? Not the same designer whatsoever. The designer of this car (Ian Callum) also designs cars for Aston Martin. There is NO influence from the Mondeo. Jaguar is not owned by Ford anymore, not that that was bad anyway, they were still Jaguar, and I feel bad for those so ignorant to think they were Fords
It's nice, no doubt, I'm not trying to hate on Jaguar for making a new design or anything. I just don't like the back. And if you read the comments made on this car you will notice most people are commenting on how it is a nice car and everything but the back is ugly.
Calm down, all you grumpy haters. Jaguar did the same thing in '68 with the first XJ, made a totally new car different from the old S-Type. After 41 damn years it's time for a change AGAIN! As a devout Jag fan myself, at least I'M willing to give the new car a chance!
As a XJ owner, if this is the indication of how current and future XJ8s are going to look, I'll just go back and buy an old model XJ or something else entirely. 1) No Kitty. Why did they take the kitty off? 2) This car looks nothing like a Jag. It looks like something hopped over the fence.
@tloislane007, they do have the Leaper for the hood. Its an option. In the UK its illegal to have a hood ornament, so they made it an option for the USA. Also, this has alot of Jaguar in it, I dont want to explain all of it AGAIN, just look at my previous comments
Remake the E-Type, that's it. Nothing else; like what
Ford just did with the Mustang.
Anyone who thinks this XJ is anything special is just lying to themselves so they don't have to face the grim fact that Jaguar made a really unremarkable and undistinguished car.
Jaguar forgot about their design clues. What an ugly piece of crap. Front grill looks like a mix of 300 & Volvo. Back looks like a mix of Continental GT and Cadillac. Front light have LEDs like an Audi.
@freddytuber Grill is styled from the Series III Jaguar XJ6, not a volvo or chrystler. And who can complain if the back looks simmilar to a Bently?!?!?! Thats a sexy car!
i don't understand why the back just squares off. I mean it should have a muscular look or just continue with the sleek lines. But still a great design. Personally I still prefer the old XJ. THat was just a classic design.
@minibus1351 It does not exactly square off, but it is more square than some, but that helps in aerodynamics. This car has a lower drag coeficient than alot of sports cars on the road. And thats amazing for such a big car.
I don't know exactly what some people expect from a motor car these days. It looks better than any lux' sedan on the market today, yet people still moan!.. A car has to drive well, be practical & roomy, not just be good to look at!!...Jeeeessshhh!
Horrible, just horrible. How can you call this design? The grill is from the Chrysler 300, tail lights from a Cadillac DeVille, trunk lid from a Bentley Continental, air intakes from a 911, silhouette Bentely Continental (front half) and from a Mercedes CSL (back half), it just make me puke all over it and I want to slap the responsible people around a little for their stupidity!
not bad for a car. horrible for a jag. lacks pedigree and class, which jaguars had stood for (like it or not). that was the one edge that jag had had over bmw and mercedes. now they have thrown it out the window. there are better ways to bring jag to the 21st century than this.
heck if you replaced the leaping cat logos with the blue oval, i doubt so many would be ranting/raving about the design.
Lacks pedigree and class? What makes a car have pedigree and class? Old, bland, and posh looking? Driven by strreotypical Brits who supposedly drink tea and crumpets all day? Give me a break, I for one think it's glamorous, sleek, stunning, and yet it still manages to have a sense of class. Jaguar is redefining what class is, as Ian Callum said Jag's are fast beautiful cars meant to be driven by fast, young, cool and beautiful people.
I AGREE COMPLETELY. i was about to post a comment, but it was going to be almost exactly what you said. If there was a Hyundai logo on it, people wouldn't take a second look, the jag design team has absolutely thrown their edge away.
It's absolutely stunning, although in reality the new XJ is the C-XF with a Maybach back end.
It's great to see the change with Jag. Give it a few years and Jaguar will claim some much over due market domination in a world plauged with BMW burnout.
I love the LED lights... it's becoming the ultimate symbol of 21st century Luxury cars... I absolutely admire Ian Callum's work!!! He knows how to design great CARS.....
Racist much fontheking? If it wasn't for the Indians Jag would have fallen, Jag has been able to stand on it's feet because of the funding the Indians have provided, so quit your B.S. The designer is British, and everything that deals with the cars themselves is British
If you look at the rear lights in a specific angle, you can see some details derived from the rear lights of the previous XJ and they're probably after the Maserati Quattroporte.
I'm speechless although I think they've overdid the front the size of the front grill and the headlights are a bit too slant but overall a great new design. I am really surprised about this car. I thought the XF was the most advance looking jag but this is something else and at last, interior is now very modern yet classy. Great job Jaguar. Now it's time for making that XJR or replacing that X type and now were talking. And it's got daytime running lights like those new cars from Merc and Audi.
@mondesost2202008 if they remake the x-type I garentee there will be alot of moaners. I love the x-type but alot of jaguar owners that have the more expensive jaguars hate it, because they feel it brings the jaguar name down. I have an XJR and a SIII XJ6, and I still love the x-type, but I dont think it will be good for Jaguar to remake it
I dont see why it ruins the image of Jaguar. Its a very nice car, even though it has the chasis of the mondeo or not, its still a nice car. The style says Jaguar, and the interior says Jaguar. I mean your right, thats what most saw in the x-type, but its a shame, because it really is a good car
I don't think it's the looks or the britishness of the car though because it much resembles the bigger Jaguar XJ which is my favorite Jaguar of all time.
The reason is because with the X-type, even though it's very exclusive because many preferred to buy a BMW, Merc or Audi, made Jaguar a bit less of the exclusive brand much like BMW is right now. Jaguar nowadays is aiming for a much more upper class customer and exclusivity so the X-type isn't really necessary.
Thats true. The funny thing is, that companies like Mercedes, BMW, Audi, all have a lower end car (BMW with the 1 series, Merc. with their C class, and Audi with the A4), And a very high end car (Merc. has the AMG and Maybach, BMW has the M, Audi has the S line) But Jaguar, for whatever reason, should not have an entry level car like the X-Type. I understand their goal, and Im not really complaining, its just interesting. And Merry Christmas to you too!!!
Don't forget BMW has Rolls Royce and Audi has Bentley.
I don't think Jaguar needs a higher end car because they're already exclusive enough compared to their German rivals.
And don't forget that aside from the higher end cars the German rivals have, they also have Estates, SUVS and such which makes them less exclusive so they need a higher end car to keep themselves exclusive.
The Full sized and Midsized Executive Saloons and the Coupe/Convertible GT cars are all Jaguar needs.
I didnt know Audi had Bently. I knew audi had lamborghini, porche, and VW, but I didnt know about Bently. Haha yah, thats one thing i have liked about Jaguar, No SUV's! Well, Landrover is basically Jaguar, but still, not SUV with Jaguar on it. Jaguar still makes the x-type, but only in England It looks really nice too! Im not sure if it still has ford in it or not tho...
Well Audi is currently owned by Volkswagen who owns Bentley as well as Porsche. Land Rover is something like a Jaguar Off Roading Division since they're owned by one company but of course it's a different brand.
I like the X type too. I like the fact that Jeremy Clarkson proved that the 4wd system of the Xtype is good by driving the sedan down a ski slope and the Estate (which said to have a bigger luggage space than it's rivals) in the snow. Interior is very welcoming compared to others too.
Not an XJ Roadster but a Jaguar Roadster. I'm thinking recreating the E-Type which is one of the best classic roadsters. I wouldn't really mind it being a soft top as long as it's a proper Jag Roadster but having a hardtop roof (lightweight if they can) the better.
That's what Jaguar needs. Fill up the empty spaces the legendary cars of it's older days have left. Maybe if they did in the future, I might be one of them buyers =D
after waiting a year...Jag does this CRAP? HORRIBLE C PILLAR IDEA. NO FOGS? ABANDON THE 4 LIGHT LOOK ? LOOKS LIKE A CHEAP MAXIMA NOW. CHEAP EXHAUST TIPS...SHOULD BE OVAL. GREAT INTERIOR...THANK GOD. BORING AUDI LED LITE BAR...WHY NO CAT EYES IDEA OR HALO EFFECT? The new XJ designers need to be fired!!!! I was going to order...now I will get a Panamera or Quattroprte instead after I sell my current XJ. WTF Jag???geezzzz. what a let down.
Interior I think is ok with exception of that steering wheel, which I hate...makes me think of the new Camaro steering wheel which I think to be ugly.
Panamera is definitely a winner...I'm excited to see this new Grand Bentley...maybe that'll put some pizazz back in.
I saw this car with huge rims on it today. . .
mzN1337 6 months ago
Jaguar is no longer English but Indian, I love my Indian culture and India will soon be the 2nd powerful country in the world
TheNutizilnbr1 1 year ago
just wow!
Dondondon68 1 year ago
looks like audi
princealexrico10 1 year ago
wow
11meggy121 1 year ago
so beu...
leparditas 1 year ago
Comment removed
L4z1n3ss 1 year ago
if you feel sick just search this car on google images...im pretty sure the sight of this specimen will cure most common illnesses.
adulby 1 year ago
Este é o carro dos meus sonhos, a JAGUAR é simplesmente incrível.
Adudinho 2 years ago
@arnair81 well, interior is completely ruined by blue neons which are usually found in 18 years old "tuned up" cars, bmws and other crap
DjiXas 2 years ago
they are not neon lights. They are LED, and they are suttle, not Super bright
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
The Blue LED's makes the already modern Jag Interior, even more modern and unlike tuned up ricers with neons, it ain't overdone. Just right and elegant. Everybody(luxury car manufacturers) is doing it.
mondeost2202008 2 years ago
So Gorgeous
Dundee1206 2 years ago
I cant see any styling clues that tell me its a Jag.
capitalsho 2 years ago
@capitalsho i know, isn't it great!!!!!!!!????
J40d 2 years ago
@capitalsho There are many many cues of a jaguar. This car was based off of the Jaguar XJ6. If you pay attention, you will see that the grille is very simmilar, the long low and wide profile remains, the shaped hood that is always on a Jaguar, The overall shape is simmilar to my XJR, the very small C pillar. It takes a good eye to spot them, but they are there.
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
i really like the way this car looks :)
ImKavkazy 2 years ago
if it werent for those ugly blacked out c pillars.... come on, a supermodel can have one mole, not two.
RomanJockMCO 2 years ago
The Austin Princess for the new millennium!
Hmmm, think I'll stick to the old xj.
archiebollux 2 years ago
Fantastic, love the front, the interior and the engines BUT without the blacked out rear pillars this would look like a hatch back, the designers obviously couldn't resolve certain issues with the rear end, so sad!
character1969 2 years ago
Выгладит как дешевая консерва, музыка не совпадает с видео, в общем впечатление испорчено....
idea2b 2 years ago
Comment removed
punditaputhra 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Its look like an updated infinity Q45.
Formulastreet 2 years ago
I can't wait to get this. Have been waiting my whole life.
NeoEpzilon 2 years ago 4
Nice but the rear-end is so bad !!!
3boody2000 2 years ago
I THINK THE REAR END IS AMAZING
newyorkcitymayor 2 years ago 6
@newyorkcitymayor
Thank you for saying that! at last someone who can spot the most special part of this car right away!
jakartans 1 year ago
I think the rear end looks dis-proportionate.
tnguyen318 8 months ago
i have some issues with the exterior. I'm not a big fan of the front grill. It looks to pimp for a jaguar. It's too big and also there's a weird line in the back side of the car where the rear window meats the booth (luggage w/e it's call). positive: the interior i love it.
javiersuarez15 2 years ago
@jagiersuarez15 The grille is styled after the XJ6 SIII. And the line in the back, makes it flow. I noticed that too, and was not sure if I liked it or not, but when I saw it in person, it just makes it seamless. It flows in one continuous line, wich is elegant
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
its butt is ugly...
s7330 2 years ago
volvo grille
smiley32s 2 years ago
When you are paying 80000 pounds for a car, I am sure they will put the Kitty on the bonnet.
This thing is so dam nice.
deanebird 2 years ago
Its a 2,000 dollar option im prety sure
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
This is the best looking car in the world
And knowing Jaguar's reputation for luxury (especially ride comfort), I soon think (although i reserve judgement) that this could be the best car in the world
ajmangalore 2 years ago 3
i never liked jaguar but ill admit the xf is nice. the xj is pretty good but the tail lights are just sad.
iCheckVtec 2 years ago
Also the IS is ugly.
LukeXgamer 2 years ago
the IS is not ugly...dude c'mon...seriously...
iCheckVtec 2 years ago
2:58
SICKNESS
hello76042 2 years ago
a mi me gusta y muuuuucho
greatmustis 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
UGLY UGLY UGLY
Xedoscar 2 years ago
Do you know what is the good thing?
Is that, no one of the people that made those comments can really buy this jaguar, so enjoy your old cheap cars and say whatever you want about this jag, because you are going to be on your crap for a very long time, and the people that said that they have a jag, and this is not jaguar, i could bet that is REALLY REALLY OLD.
mots666 2 years ago
Sorry it looks to much like a mondeo was it the same designer.
mucky123456 2 years ago
LOL where did you EVER see a mondeo in this car? Not the same designer whatsoever. The designer of this car (Ian Callum) also designs cars for Aston Martin. There is NO influence from the Mondeo. Jaguar is not owned by Ford anymore, not that that was bad anyway, they were still Jaguar, and I feel bad for those so ignorant to think they were Fords
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
Haha sooo true! well spoken
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
It's nice, no doubt, I'm not trying to hate on Jaguar for making a new design or anything. I just don't like the back. And if you read the comments made on this car you will notice most people are commenting on how it is a nice car and everything but the back is ugly.
LoveLaughter777 2 years ago
Lol... its still better then the old XJ back
dazedinfusionz 2 years ago
new owners trying to SPICE things up
blaum5 2 years ago
that's one beauty. Welldone Jaguar!
shoks1970 2 years ago 2
Just another peace of soap
jombo567 2 years ago
Ok, so you dont think there is ANY style in this car?
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
Calm down, all you grumpy haters. Jaguar did the same thing in '68 with the first XJ, made a totally new car different from the old S-Type. After 41 damn years it's time for a change AGAIN! As a devout Jag fan myself, at least I'M willing to give the new car a chance!
quirpco 2 years ago
Agreed
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
As a XJ owner, if this is the indication of how current and future XJ8s are going to look, I'll just go back and buy an old model XJ or something else entirely. 1) No Kitty. Why did they take the kitty off? 2) This car looks nothing like a Jag. It looks like something hopped over the fence.
tloislane007 2 years ago
@tloislane007, they do have the Leaper for the hood. Its an option. In the UK its illegal to have a hood ornament, so they made it an option for the USA. Also, this has alot of Jaguar in it, I dont want to explain all of it AGAIN, just look at my previous comments
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
Remake the E-Type, that's it. Nothing else; like what
Ford just did with the Mustang.
Anyone who thinks this XJ is anything special is just lying to themselves so they don't have to face the grim fact that Jaguar made a really unremarkable and undistinguished car.
korgri 2 years ago
Fat ass.))
aoke13 2 years ago
I think this car looks beautiful. It looks like a mix between a bently and a Rolls Royce. I don't really like the LED though, but it's growing on me.
rbrtchng 2 years ago
Jaguar forgot about their design clues. What an ugly piece of crap. Front grill looks like a mix of 300 & Volvo. Back looks like a mix of Continental GT and Cadillac. Front light have LEDs like an Audi.
freddytuber 2 years ago
@freddytuber Grill is styled from the Series III Jaguar XJ6, not a volvo or chrystler. And who can complain if the back looks simmilar to a Bently?!?!?! Thats a sexy car!
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
Audi side windows, Maserati rear
wearejusthumanbeing 2 years ago
the back is starting to grow on me now!!!!!!!
mickeyb88 2 years ago
The back on this SUCKS!! It's a pretty good looking car otherwise though, which is disappointing as a Jaguar fan and owner.
LoveLaughter777 2 years ago 2
yea the back is strange, doesnt fit in with the rest of the car
canoeshoe 2 years ago
the back and front designs look great seperatly, but when u put them togheter , it's a bit ugly.
The designs just don't match , it's like two cars where merged into one.
YYuMax 2 years ago
i don't understand why the back just squares off. I mean it should have a muscular look or just continue with the sleek lines. But still a great design. Personally I still prefer the old XJ. THat was just a classic design.
minibus1351 2 years ago 2
@minibus1351 It does not exactly square off, but it is more square than some, but that helps in aerodynamics. This car has a lower drag coeficient than alot of sports cars on the road. And thats amazing for such a big car.
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
the taillights should have been similar to the XF but have a break to make it look angry. i never liked Jag, but this car is beautiful
iCheckVtec 2 years ago
the BACK IS UGLY
nimrooo 2 years ago 3
I say it once and I say it again give me the 2009 XJ Jaguar . Next time do what Ford did for the 2005 and 2010 Mustang. Build it and they will come.
maureencora 2 years ago
It looked good... until I saw the back. smh
TheLoneJester 2 years ago
agree.
semayetoktingga 2 years ago
I like it too:)))))
Komentator009 2 years ago
I dont know, but i like it.
NoSurrender97 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey Guys! CHECK OUT MY NEW VIDEO: "My Request to You"
-Karey
krizzyfoshizz 2 years ago
I don't know exactly what some people expect from a motor car these days. It looks better than any lux' sedan on the market today, yet people still moan!.. A car has to drive well, be practical & roomy, not just be good to look at!!...Jeeeessshhh!
steve11fox 2 years ago
Horrible, just horrible. How can you call this design? The grill is from the Chrysler 300, tail lights from a Cadillac DeVille, trunk lid from a Bentley Continental, air intakes from a 911, silhouette Bentely Continental (front half) and from a Mercedes CSL (back half), it just make me puke all over it and I want to slap the responsible people around a little for their stupidity!
freddytuber 2 years ago
not bad for a car. horrible for a jag. lacks pedigree and class, which jaguars had stood for (like it or not). that was the one edge that jag had had over bmw and mercedes. now they have thrown it out the window. there are better ways to bring jag to the 21st century than this.
heck if you replaced the leaping cat logos with the blue oval, i doubt so many would be ranting/raving about the design.
fp5carbon1 2 years ago
It 's far sleeker & sexier than the bland boxy cars the Germans seem to be making these days.
19Lion8 2 years ago
Lacks pedigree and class? What makes a car have pedigree and class? Old, bland, and posh looking? Driven by strreotypical Brits who supposedly drink tea and crumpets all day? Give me a break, I for one think it's glamorous, sleek, stunning, and yet it still manages to have a sense of class. Jaguar is redefining what class is, as Ian Callum said Jag's are fast beautiful cars meant to be driven by fast, young, cool and beautiful people.
Smooth258 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
fontheking5 2 years ago
If you liked the old one better by a fucking older model you prick.
LukeXgamer 2 years ago
if only i wish young,cool,beautiful people like me (XD) could afford it..... ;)
orangmiri 2 years ago
I AGREE COMPLETELY. i was about to post a comment, but it was going to be almost exactly what you said. If there was a Hyundai logo on it, people wouldn't take a second look, the jag design team has absolutely thrown their edge away.
kvetonp 2 years ago 2
It's absolutely stunning, although in reality the new XJ is the C-XF with a Maybach back end.
It's great to see the change with Jag. Give it a few years and Jaguar will claim some much over due market domination in a world plauged with BMW burnout.
BrianMauk 2 years ago
this car looks perfect
stizjudaz232 2 years ago 3
a great actor MJ dies and a great car XJ comes alive!
in12233 2 years ago
Comment removed
element4life24 2 years ago
I see some design elements from C-XF!!!
I love the LED lights... it's becoming the ultimate symbol of 21st century Luxury cars... I absolutely admire Ian Callum's work!!! He knows how to design great CARS.....
AMAZING!!!!!!!!!
skim2399 2 years ago 5
you love the led lights but i think its not fair to copy the design from audi.
the halo or angel eyes are for bmw. those leds were for bmw jaguar just copied it. sad.
anurek123 2 years ago
What a load of moaners.
cerbman1 2 years ago 6
Comment removed
fontheking5 2 years ago
And in the interior it's look like Jaguar XF,,,
BMW 7 Series
and Ford Mondeo !!!
samassy69 2 years ago
I agree but for me the rear looks like the Bentley Continental....
manchiscap 2 years ago 4
How would that be a bad thing? The continental is Beautiful!
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
@manchiscap And that's a bad thing is it.
LukeXgamer 1 year ago
@LukeXgamer not really.
manchiscap 1 year ago
Racist much fontheking? If it wasn't for the Indians Jag would have fallen, Jag has been able to stand on it's feet because of the funding the Indians have provided, so quit your B.S. The designer is British, and everything that deals with the cars themselves is British
Smooth258 2 years ago
Looks like a XF on Steiods.
maureencora 2 years ago 6
And before I forget
If you look at the rear lights in a specific angle, you can see some details derived from the rear lights of the previous XJ and they're probably after the Maserati Quattroporte.
mondeost2202008 2 years ago
I'm speechless although I think they've overdid the front the size of the front grill and the headlights are a bit too slant but overall a great new design. I am really surprised about this car. I thought the XF was the most advance looking jag but this is something else and at last, interior is now very modern yet classy. Great job Jaguar. Now it's time for making that XJR or replacing that X type and now were talking. And it's got daytime running lights like those new cars from Merc and Audi.
mondeost2202008 2 years ago
@mondesost2202008 if they remake the x-type I garentee there will be alot of moaners. I love the x-type but alot of jaguar owners that have the more expensive jaguars hate it, because they feel it brings the jaguar name down. I have an XJR and a SIII XJ6, and I still love the x-type, but I dont think it will be good for Jaguar to remake it
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
Well the only reason I think they hated the X-type is that under the skin of the X-type lies a Ford Mondeo which ruins the image of Jaguar.
Well I don't bother anymore. Jaguar wants to be a more exclusive brand than before so I respect that.
Now If only they were planning on a Roadster then now we are talking!!
mondeost2202008 2 years ago 2
I dont see why it ruins the image of Jaguar. Its a very nice car, even though it has the chasis of the mondeo or not, its still a nice car. The style says Jaguar, and the interior says Jaguar. I mean your right, thats what most saw in the x-type, but its a shame, because it really is a good car
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
I don't think it's the looks or the britishness of the car though because it much resembles the bigger Jaguar XJ which is my favorite Jaguar of all time.
The reason is because with the X-type, even though it's very exclusive because many preferred to buy a BMW, Merc or Audi, made Jaguar a bit less of the exclusive brand much like BMW is right now. Jaguar nowadays is aiming for a much more upper class customer and exclusivity so the X-type isn't really necessary.
By the way, merry Christmas!
mondeost2202008 2 years ago
Thats true. The funny thing is, that companies like Mercedes, BMW, Audi, all have a lower end car (BMW with the 1 series, Merc. with their C class, and Audi with the A4), And a very high end car (Merc. has the AMG and Maybach, BMW has the M, Audi has the S line) But Jaguar, for whatever reason, should not have an entry level car like the X-Type. I understand their goal, and Im not really complaining, its just interesting. And Merry Christmas to you too!!!
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
Don't forget BMW has Rolls Royce and Audi has Bentley.
I don't think Jaguar needs a higher end car because they're already exclusive enough compared to their German rivals.
And don't forget that aside from the higher end cars the German rivals have, they also have Estates, SUVS and such which makes them less exclusive so they need a higher end car to keep themselves exclusive.
The Full sized and Midsized Executive Saloons and the Coupe/Convertible GT cars are all Jaguar needs.
mondeost2202008 2 years ago
I didnt know Audi had Bently. I knew audi had lamborghini, porche, and VW, but I didnt know about Bently. Haha yah, thats one thing i have liked about Jaguar, No SUV's! Well, Landrover is basically Jaguar, but still, not SUV with Jaguar on it. Jaguar still makes the x-type, but only in England It looks really nice too! Im not sure if it still has ford in it or not tho...
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
Well Audi is currently owned by Volkswagen who owns Bentley as well as Porsche. Land Rover is something like a Jaguar Off Roading Division since they're owned by one company but of course it's a different brand.
I like the X type too. I like the fact that Jeremy Clarkson proved that the 4wd system of the Xtype is good by driving the sedan down a ski slope and the Estate (which said to have a bigger luggage space than it's rivals) in the snow. Interior is very welcoming compared to others too.
mondeost2202008 2 years ago
Ok cool. Good to learn something once in a while lol!
Yes, that was good. All but 1 test for the x-type on top gear was in the snow. Gotta love Top-Gear!
austins2002jaguarXJR 2 years ago
@mondeost2202008 an xj roadster would be very nice but all that gear in it would be hard to pull off
nameis12396 2 years ago
Not an XJ Roadster but a Jaguar Roadster. I'm thinking recreating the E-Type which is one of the best classic roadsters. I wouldn't really mind it being a soft top as long as it's a proper Jag Roadster but having a hardtop roof (lightweight if they can) the better.
That's what Jaguar needs. Fill up the empty spaces the legendary cars of it's older days have left. Maybe if they did in the future, I might be one of them buyers =D
mondeost2202008 2 years ago
They SHOULD have:
Kept the vertical vent on fender..why? Because the horizontal vent looks like EVERYone elses, Range Rover does it vertical, so should Jag. Brits!
They SHOULD have kept the 4 headlights...classic Jaguar icon. with fog lamps.
They Should have blacked out ENTIRE roofline...the c-pillar only looks dumb.
DINO1200 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
absolutely-rite,,der-losing-der-identity--fuk-it--go-bak-to-d-60s-lol--lol
nazoy 2 years ago
amazing !!!!! nice work JAG !!!!! Previous Xj and this new Xj are totally different....this looks really cool and futuristic.
PMjlr 2 years ago
DINO1200 2 years ago
Interior I think is ok with exception of that steering wheel, which I hate...makes me think of the new Camaro steering wheel which I think to be ugly.
Panamera is definitely a winner...I'm excited to see this new Grand Bentley...maybe that'll put some pizazz back in.
donteadossi 2 years ago
orgasmic!!!
blakaxe 2 years ago
jaguar is officially back!!! keep up the good work, sexxxxy car
jreyes30 2 years ago
i like it, but the back lights remind me the Toyota solara or Maserati....
boricua4669 2 years ago