For the record, I would be honored to be living today in the Confederate States of America, where slavery would have been long-since abolished by force of conscience rather than force of arms. What we have here, instead is slavery largely transferred from blacks to whites---called the FEDERAL INCOME TAX.
@reuthful white supremancy was the founding principle of the Confederacy. That comes from the words of the Confederate leaders. It is very possible that if the Condederacy had won slavery would have never ended.
Anybody ever wonder how the word "secession" got morphed into "rebellion"?. After all, for example Ordinances of Secession were intrinsically legal, unless and until ruled on by SCOTUS. Since the North won the subsequent WAR, it could call "secession", "rebellion", and make it look as if it were supressing an illegal, treasonous act. This made its resupply of Fort Sumter, a 'casus belli', look very unlike the act of Lincolnian Northern Aggression that it was.
@reuthful well, you know what they say, 'you have to break a few eggs to make an omlette'. i like the outcome of the civil war. because of that war, with the north winning, we are now a great, great nation. or would you prefer to live in a weaker csa?
Go read the Southern Ultimatums. What the SOuthern leaders demanded, under threat of war. Southern newspapers such as the RIchmond Enquirer March 21, 1861, or any other Southern newspaper of that time. The Southern ULtimatums also appeared in New York papers.
All five of the SOuthern Ultimatums were about ONE thing -- the SPREAD of slavery, against the will of the people and states.
FIrst of all -- the dumb fuck starts off with a lie (in the video dialog) --- some shit about 'the South believed that the North would stop at NOTHING to end slavery"
What total dog dig shit. Are you fucking NUTS? You shit eating moron, that wasn't it at all.
The Southern leaders FUCKING SAID why -- in their ultimatums you stupid shit. Yes, ULTIMATUMS from the South -
What did the South demand? Their Ultimatums were for the VIOLENT SPREAD OF SLAVERY.
@NavyBeer hey guys; leave navybeer alone. he's obviously feeling attacked and trying to use his "big boy words" he learned during that sleep over at coach's house. haha. you use a lot of big words there, Miss Beer (i'm assuming you're single); it makes you sound really intelligent...especially when you CAPITALIZE words every SO OFTEN. have a nice day, ma'am :B
@kglenn86 you can't prove shit moron -- see the Southern Ultimatums, retard. Your Southern Leaders issued them. Your SOuthern newspapers headlines called them THE TRUE ISSUE
Do you know what the Southern Ultimatums - by Southern Leaders -- were?
The SPREAD of slavery. Got that? That is what you leaders said, and your newspapers reported in headlines as "THE TRUE ISSUE"
Slavery caused the civil war? Give me a break. Why not talk about the fact that the South left the Union due to Lincolns tyrannical tax which forced 80% of all The United States taxes to be levied from the south. The southern states left the union primarily due to their desire to protect their rights to not be taxed unfairly by a tyrannical government which violated their rights.
@themagus187 you are 100% right! unfortunately kids in school are still being taught wrongly in their history books that it was all on slavery, fkn self interested politicians
@italstallion06 if you don't know it was about slavery, you are an idiot. The South said so -- over and over. To the South, it was about their right to SPREAD slavery according to Gods will. To the NOrth, it was about stopping the illegal rebellion.
The south bragged it was about slavery at the time. Once they lost, they made up different excuses
@themagus187 what a dumb fuck you are. First, Jefferson Davis himself said the tax had NOTHING to do with it. Got that retard - thats from your president.
Second dumb fuck --Lincoln didn't even pass that tax retard, it was passed a few days before he got there. The SOuth had ALREADY had 7 states secede you stupid fuck --- BEFORE the law passed. DO you grasp that you stupid fuck.
Read what the SOUTH said about it -- at the time. They said SLAVERY -- over and over and over.
Lincoln wasn't going the kick slave owners for no legal reason - a person couldn't have been born a slave after the passage of the 5th Amd rights to Life, Liberty and Property for all persons, reguardless of what the Supreme Court said a truth is a thruth . The 5th Amendment was an Amendment to the US Constitution ... the fugitive slave act of 1793 was not, it violated the 5th Amd for those born after 1791
@dizzo95 I agree no one was legally a slave, and certainly the treatment of slaves was illegal and unconstitutional. The USSC, in Dred Scott, issued a corrupt and illegal ruling -- very likely they wrote what Davis and other slave leaders instructed them too. Lincoln accused them of this -- House Divided Speech.
But the South was shitting all over the Constitution -- and trying to SPREAD slavery even more. That's why Lincooln had to push back and not let the fucks spread slavery.
This video couldn't cram more half truths and cliches in if they tried. The South didnt fucking worry about Lincoln trying to end slavery you fucking idiot. Llincoln was bending over backwards PROMISING NOT to, retard, and had ALWAYS been VERY outspoken against any military force to stop slavery You fuck tard, LInclolns big thig was to prevent any SPREAD of slavery. If you don't fucking grasp that, then go fucking stick your head up your ass.
KL-- the entire secession thing was illegal. There is no clear way to secede, but here is what is NOT legal --- and what they did. Killing voters for daring to vote --not allowing real elections in most of the South, threatening the capital, attacking 12, not 1, fort, and using violence and threats for decades. If they hang voters now, stop elections now, threaten the capital now - we will kick their ass again.
@KLguy133 legal way would be to get Congress to agree to it, I guess. Or pass a Constitutional Amendment. There is no set way. But its NOT to attack 12 forts, kill voters, loot treasuries and armories, threaten the capital, stop free speech for 40 years, stop real elections. That is what the SOuth was doing.
The Southern leaders were violent men, used to getting their way by violence and threats. They were bullies.
@KLguy133 what are the "clear connections" to the present?
Are Southern states invading other states with killers and thugs, to spread slavery? Are they trying to terrorize Kansas, who was against slavery 98% to 2%, to accept slavery or die?
Are Southern States promising war if their candidate loses?
Are Southern states killing voters, threatening the capital?
What the fuck clear connections are you talking about?
3rd, Lincoln certainly did not support the slaves over the aristocracy. When their land was divided up and given to the freed slaves, Lincoln had them driven off at bayonet point
4th, the last slave to walk the streets of Richmond was owned by someone from the north. Maybe you've heard of Grant?
5th, the north was just as racist as the north. Do you think the Confederates came up with slavery just because they were evil? NO! Slavery just wasn't practical in the north. It wasn't out of any higher morality at all.
6th, the south only did what all people have done in all of human history; that includes Africansby the way.
Dauntless -- wrong idiot Slavery was in Maryland, Delaware -- Missouir The climate was no fucking different in Ohio, Illinois But scum sucking pigs had control of slave states idiot. And only the Confederacy -- in all of history - was literally FOUNDED on "the great moral truth" that God ordained slavery. The Southern leaders BRAGGED about that, idiot. Learn real history.
Dauntless dumb fuck -- slavery is not mentioned in the Constitution until it was prohibited. Got that retard? But here is what IS mentioned -- freedom of speech, which the South shit on for 2 generations, freedom of press, which the S shit on, real elections, which the South shit on, no cruel punishment, which the South shit on. Learn read history, idiot.
So you said Confederates weren't Nazi like because no genocide? They were about to - if they could. Their leaders OPENLY talked about genocide - "killing our negroes with our own hands"" said one governor, if they had to free them.
And - many blacks were slaughtered, outright, by Southern scum after the war. But Blacks were now armed - and fighting back. Whites were scared shitless of blacks, if it was remotely a fair fight - whites ran, hid.
In fact, the only reason the South didn't go into genocide mode - -as many of them had said they would do -- is that blacks got guns. Blacks were armed. Blacks started to fight back. Whites were fucking TERRIFIED of blacks after the war. Fucking scared shitless, which is EXACTLY why the pussies wore mask, a la KKK. Blacks learned how to kick ass - and whites knew it, and were terrified.
A Person couldn't have been born a slave after passage of the Bill of Rights in 1791 ? that was why Congress passed the Fugitive slave law in 1793 it didn't amend the Bill of Rights so a person couldn't legally have been born a slave under the US Constition after 1791 but criminals won. and On October 20, 1774
" The articles of the Continental Association imposed an immediate ban on ... the slave trade) "
Dizzo - excellent point In fact, slavery was unconstitutional, and illegal, from 1791 on,, and many people said so at the time. Only by shitting, stomping, and pissing on the Constitution did the South keep slavery. They used cruel and unusual punishment -- which is against constitution They stopped free press and speech - against the constitution. There was NOTHING in constituion allowing anyone to sell a child, rape a slave, torture run aways, ect
Thank God the North won. The South had some nerve to beat someone because they are black, in front of God 's eyes. I may be from Texas,but I say death to the rebels.
Kyle -- oh shit it went way beyond beating blacks. They burned them to death if they fought back. Whipped the shit out of them for "bad attitude" or for complaining when their children were sold.
Read what was really going on in slavery -- it was hell on earth. For some reason, much of that shit has been covered up or forgotten.
Read the slave autobiographies or even the letters and diaries of slave owners. Beatings were the least of it.
THIRDLY if you cant speak to somebody without calling them a dumb fuck.. especially when they are stating facts then you should have stayed in your shitty comprehensive.
Con dumb fuck -- Lincoln said his intention was to kill slavery by stopping its grown, but that he had no legal authority or ability to use force to end it.
But guess what dumb fuck? When you dumb fucks attacked US troops and started the war --that changed everything dumb fuck.
He did the Emancipation Proclamation -- then he helped pass the 13th AMendment dumb fuck. He kicked slavers ass just like he said they deserved.
Meet dumb fuck -- sorry idiot - that wasn't Northern leaders dumb fuck -- that was southern scum trying to hold on to their slave pussy and power.
Lincoln and the North rejected that shit dumb fuck. You lost your slaves, you lost your pussy, you lost your power, and you fucks have been crying about it for 150 years.
you Americans live in the most open, and privileged society in the world, you defend your rights and freedoms with zeal and gusto.
So for what ever reason, beyond my ken, you equally decide to drag yourselves down to pointless arguments about nothing, the American Civil War was fought for good good reasons at the time, thats 1861-65, this is 2009,
You are a strong country, no looking back, you should look forward to a stronger you.
Lincoln was only against slavery because France staunchly opposed such an institution. Lincoln used this cause to obtain an alliance with France. He was not as pure in intention or as saintly as most would like to believe. Let's not even start with what he did the American Indians.
Kind of like George W Bush giving hundreds of milliions of dollars and industry that belongs in the USA to countries in exchange for putting US troops so he could launch his world domination war that has failed miserably. Nobody has learned from the past because everyone's too busy pointing fingers trying to find the source to place the blame on
Confederacy was based on stuff the Nazis were too timid to say -- white men should enslave black men the world over.
Davis and Stephens both bragged that GOD intended whites to enslave blacks -- Stephens said whites all over the world would learn from the Confederates to enslave blacks like GOD intended.
They bragged that the FOUNDATION of COnfederacy was to enslave the inferior blacks, as God intened.
Funny how you lunatics dont dare say what your Southern Leaders bragged about.
You also forget to tell of the Northern Leaders in Congress passing a Amendment to the US Constitution that would allow Slavery forever.... funny how you lunatics only tell part of the story.
HAHAHA! Typical race card whore. Be thankful that you were born in USA, where before your loud mouth was breathing there were hundreds of thousands "white nazis", that died for your freedom, while their (Irish for example) was still denied.
Yes Lach - whites and blacks fought the Nazi Confederates and beat them.
Plus dumb fuck -- the Confederates used slave labor to build every fortress they hid behind. The basic war was the pussy Confedertates hiding behind massive earth works they forced slaves to build.
Bunch of pussies. The South lost when so many of you pussies deserted, Lee had no army left.
Davis himself said 2/3 of your pussy soldiers deserted.
@12FlyMe Wow, you must have gotten a F in your history class on world war 2. Nazis lost every war.....you really need to study history before you start saying things.
@12FlyMe, Nazis and Confederates have NOTHING in common. I don't even know where to begin on their opposites "dumb fuck," so I'll ask you, how is being a confederate like being a Nazi?
Dauntless dumb fuck -- Nazism was based on being in control of "inferior humans", almost exactly like Confederates. Nazis stopped free speech, free press-- so did the Confederates. But even Nazis didn't rape their slaves, then sell their OWN children into slavery, which was COMMON practice by men like Lee, Davis, ect. Nazis allowed no real elections -- either did Confederates.
But of the two groups, Nazis had more honor, vile as they were.
-Confederates wern't gassing anyone they felt wasn't southern enough!
-Confederates did allow elections and the press, that's why immediately after they seceeded they declared all US laws that did not conflict with their secession were still valid. Sure, blacks wern't included, but do you really think laws in the north were any kinder?
@Dauntless07 -Yes, some slave owners did pare their slaves and sell the children into slavery, but you are very NAIEVE to blieve no one was raped anyone in the Holocaust.
-Nazis had more honor? YOU SICKEN ME! They were nothing but bullies taking whatever hey wanted. The Confederate soldiers were defending their homes and families from what they perceved as an oppressive power.
-By your logic, the rebels of the American Revolution were worse than Nazis.
Dauntless - slave rape was epidemic dumb fuck. ALmost half the slaves were born mixed race - do you think Casper the ghost fucked the mother, retard?
The Holocaust slaves were not being raped, dumb fuck. Perhaps isolated horney Nazis. But the Confederate leaders virtually all had fucked dozens, if not hundreds of slaves. And made a small fortune then selling their own children into slavery,
Daunt, yes, Nazis had more honor. They did not rape children, then sell their own offspring into slavery -- but the Slave owners almmost all did that. They did not torture women for running away -- slavery was founded on cruel violent punishment of people who ran away. Nazis did not burn to death men who fought back - burning to death slaves who rebelled was fun sport to the South.
Dauntless -- and I guess you didn't learn that the Southern slavers were promising to kill the slaves - genocide -- if the had to free them. Did you know that dumb fuck? Several governors openly discussed killing the slaves, if they had to free them. In fact, many slaves were butchered, hung, burned, shot, by the South, in attempted genocide. The Nazis were just more organized, but the evil was the same.
Daunt wrong -- no elections dumb fuck. Lincoln wasn't even allowed on the ballot in 9 of 11 Southern States. Got that yet dumb fuck? OF the two states he WAS allowed on -- the slave owners simply didn't count his votes -- they just made up shit.
Do you know that West Virginia broke away from Virginia - because of this? No, you fucking don't know.
When that was put in the Declaration it didnt include blacks. People seem to forget that not only were many of our founding fathers slave owners but that at that time there was almost no notion anywhere that blacks were even human. They were enslaved in England and other parts of Europe, here in America and long before Europe and America in their native Africa. Africans had been enslaving Africans long before white men landed here. They created the market for the slave trade.
Abe Lincoln in that 1858 speech quoted , made a similar argument when he said : " there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness " 1858 After reading the 1858 speech I wasn't aware the Declaration of Independence also is a Law ? If Bill of Rights didn't apply to States why was slavery in Washington D.C. ? The right to own a slave person , was made up.
I agree. I dont know of anyplace it says in US legislation the people of the 19th century had the right to own slaves. However the fact is that most North or South didnt. I dont like to use many of Lincolns speeches anyway. He contrdicts himelf more than I can stand. There is one I just love he made about 12 years before secession where he openly says its a good right to have and that all people everywhere have it. The right to leave a government they no longer like that is.
As a psychoanalyst , there is something called the danger of fairy tales , because they become true, people act out what they hear or read. Abe Lincoln in 1858 was talking a lot about a civil war, then 3 years later look what happened. it would have been better to ask Congress to ban anyone being " born " into slavery . That should have happened before 1808-1820. John Adams opposed slavery because it was a "foul contagion in the human character" and "an evil of colossal magnitude. "
There were many pro and anti slavery people throughout American history. Its just given his actions from 1860-1865 I dont not see and real proof Lincoln was truly one of them agaisnt it. Gen. Lee said "Slavery is the political and social evil that plagues us all" Thats coming from a slave. Most whom he inherited ownership of when marrying his wife, however still.
Dizzo -- funny because you just crapped out a fairytale. No fucking kidding slavery SHOULD have ended before 1820. What was your first clue dumb fuck?
Not only was slaver evil shit -- it turned slave OWNERS into monsters. George Mason described the entire class of men "gentlemen class" who were monsters in disquise. Lee was one - whipping 14 year old girls, screaming at them during their torture, keeping a "hunting list" of slave women to capture/
@dizzo95 I suggest you hand in your shrink clown suit, and learn history.
Everyone was talking about civil war you retard. Are you saying Lincoln brought on the civil war by talking about it? How the FUCK do people get so stupid. Have you even BOTHERED to learn what the fuck the secessionst and slave rapers were saying? Did you ever fucking hear of the word context?
Dizzo never heard that one. Show me where LIncoln ever did that? Lincoln was bending over fucking backwards, doing somersaults, and doing everything but helping slavers whip slaves, trying to placate the fucks on EVERYTHING except spreading slavery.
So so me this 5th AMendment stuff. I've never seen it
@BullshipDetector In 1774 1st Continental Congress Resolved, 1. That ( Englishmen) are entitled to life, liberty and property:
that was amended in 1791 with the Bill or Rights Fifth Amendment – that states : No person shall ....be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;...for ALL PERSONS that caused a problem because it ment a person could not be born a slave, and Congress passed the fugitive slave act of 1793
@BullshipDetector Ha Ha I thought you did write that too but I found the quote from LickMyFoot you wrote:
" Lincoln also said slave owners should be "kicked to death", though he phased it thusly "Those who treat the negro as mere merchandise to be sold, deserve nothing but kicking, contempt, and death". Astonising quote -- from Peoria 1854."
@dizzo95 Yes Lincoln hated slavery and said slave owners should be kicked to death. But he had no legal or moral or practial way to end slavery in the South. His goal was to stop its spread, like he said about 10,000 times,
But once he WAS able to end slavery, he sure as fuck did.
Dizzo -- South Carolina SAID why -- and promised war all during the campaign if LIncoln was elected. Read their own documents.
What the hell are you talking about, "Linconl threated Aggressive Action to protect slaves rights". Is everyone on here FUCKING INSANE???? Gesus fucking Christ -- Lincoln was bending over BACKWARDS trying to appease the slave rapers on EVERYTHIGN but spreading slavery. What the fuck do you mean? Show me.
@NavyBeer this is a quote from a poster on here BulD : " Lincoln also said slave owners should be "kicked to death", though he phased it thusly "Those who treat the negro as mere merchandise to be sold, deserve nothing but kicking, contempt, and death". Astonising quote -- from Peoria 1854. Yet no Lincoln hater will dare mention that."
@dizzo95 yes, In fact, Licoln's anti slavery quotes are extreme, often, and consistant. Even in the speeches Lincoln haters quote to show he didn't care about slaves -- Lincoln gives very powerful overall message that slavery must end, but admits he knows not how, other than to stop it's growth, and let it kill the host, like a cancer.
Sgt dumb fuck - I suggest you read Lincoln's complete speeches - in order, dumb fuck/ NOt just the parts they slide up your dumb ass. Read the full speeches-- I very much doubt you can/
Read where he says slave owners should be "kicked to death" Got that dumb fuck? Kicked to DEATH. Lincoln didnt contradict himself dumb fuck - the Southern government WAS illegal, violent, fucks who should have been overthrown, idiot.
Sgt dumb fuck- you probably think the Southern Governments were legal entities. They weren't. They had no real elections, they took over by violence and deciet. Do you fucking have any clue why West Virginia broke away from Virginia? Because the fucks in Virginia never allowed real elections. There was no free speech, in the south, no free press. The Nazi like government controlled what could be read, written, spoken.
Sgt do you know that Lincoln wasn't allowed on the ballot in 9 of 11 Southern States dumb ass? That was typical - becaause there WERE no real elections in the South. And in the two states he was allowed on - -the slavers just refused to count his votes. Got that retard? They had "Saddam" type elections, enslaved millions, raped millions, sold millions of children, and terrorized millions. Try that again dumb fuck and we will kick you ass again. Clear enough?
Sgt most of the South didn't own slaves? Well, the leaders almost ALL did. Very nearly 100% of the leaders in the South owned slaves outright -- and got rich on them -- or came from slave owning familiies. Those who had no connection with slavery -- didn't support the Confederates See the difference? Plus 50% of the families in SC owned slaves - and they were in charge, idiot. SO the ruling class was very much slavers.
@Pawluk44 wrong idiot/ Something like 4% ?? You fucking idiot, 47% of the families owned slaves in SC. Virtually 100% of the Confederate leaders owned them or came from slave owning families -- grew up on slavery, the FUCKING entire social fabric, political ladder, EVERYTHING was slave status based you dumb fuck. 4% my fucking ass. Its 4 percent if you count all the North, and the slaves, and stick truth up your ass and shit on it.
@SgtZellmer you are one dumb fuck. First of all retard, I bet you never read a complete LIincoln speech in your life. Read any one of the LIncoln Douglas debates, all the way through. Or his Peoria speech. You dumb fuck need to learn something about context.
Yes dumb fuck - you have the right to revolt - and thats what was done - a revolution against the scum sucking slavers.
@SgtZellmer you never read a complete Lincoln speech, except the Gettysburg. YOu should learn something about context. Lincoln would give the racists just enough to pacify them, then clobber the living fuck out of slavery --- saying slave owners should be kicked to death. Since you dont understand what Lincoln was dealing with, you don't know how he outfoxed the slave raping, child selling scum, kicked their ass, kicked their Gods ass, and forever changed history
Dizzo right. Slavery was always illegal. And the treatment of slaves was illegal. Cruel and unusual punishment was banned in the Bill of Rights. The South of course regularly used cruel punishment. Free press, free speech, is part of Bill of rights. The South regularly shit on that -- including stopping free speech and press for whites. The Southern government controlled what WHITE people could read, write, say. They were fucking Nazi like fucks.
Dizzo Lincoln also said slave owners should be "kicked to death", though he phased it thusly "Those who treat the negro as mere merchandise to be sold, deserve nothing but kicking, contempt, and death". Astonising quote -- from Peoria 1854. Yet no Lincoln hater will dare mention that.
Sgt wrong dumb fuck - -the Declaration of INdependec said ALL Men are created equal idiot. The guy who WROTE it said it meant all men.
No dumb fuck- the slaves hhere were not enslaved in AFricaa retard. 95% of them weren't even BORN in Africa dumb fuck.
So some africans enslaved others? Some Irish butt fucked babies, too. SO what. Does that mean your dumb fucking ass should create a country, BASED on butt fucking babies, retard? What the fuck is your logic, retard?
Hmm I got mine off of his 1861 inaugural address. When people actually cared at all about what he was going to do with slavery because only then was he in a position to do anything at all about it. By that I mean maybe try and push for the complete abolition of it. Of course he didnt which is very strange. Why didnt he push for such legislation in 61 or 62? Lincoln did make a pretty pro-slavery and anti-black speech in 1858 though.
Was the right to own slaves in the U.S. made up ? There is nothing that I can find holding the original Bill if Rights that allows someone to own another person. On Ebay I bought a replica of the Original United States Bill of Rights and Constitution dated 1789 it says in:
" Article the seventh [5th Amendment]
No person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;.. "
The Bill of Rights does not say anything about the right to own slave persons.
Well thats off topic we were talking about Lincoln. However where is there any wording that even hints to people of that day believing blacks are even human? There arent in the Declaration or the Constitution back then. There was little or no notion they were even people.
My next post will a quote from ol not so honest Abe. Sorry it doesnt have quotations but the damn size requirments. Here it is Abraham Lincoln speaking at the Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois on September 18th 1858. Now after reading it are we all to undertsand that this man had a revelation of sorts in the early 1860s? I dont think so. This was before the war before he had to take advantage of slaves position to maintain support for his unjust war.
I wil say then that I am not nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people and I will also say that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality
continued:"I do not believe the two races can co-exist in any way without the titles of Inferior and Superior being assigned to each race, I as much as any other white man would like the title of Superior to stay assigned to the white race" Hmm that means blacks should be assigned Inferior. That was the whole basis behind any slavey in the worlds history. That the enslaved were either less human or just not human all together. Calling blacks "Inferior" incites just that belief. What a great guy
Lol what a crock. Abolitionists had to fight like hell to get Lincoln to even consider the EP. When he agreed to draft one it tacfully freed no one. Since as he had maintained that wasnt what the war was over. It didnt even affect the whole CSA. Parts of Virginia where and other states where Union forces were in control were left out. So was the whole state of Tennessee. "I have no intent nor do I feel I have any lawful right to interfere with or abolish the institution of slavery"-Ol Abe 1861.
and the quote continues..." but I hold that, notwithstanding all this, there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness " Ol Abe same speech 1858
The Emancipation Proclamation freed only those slaves in the Confederate states. It did not free slaves in those northern states where slavery was legal.
For the record, I would be honored to be living today in the Confederate States of America, where slavery would have been long-since abolished by force of conscience rather than force of arms. What we have here, instead is slavery largely transferred from blacks to whites---called the FEDERAL INCOME TAX.
reuthful 7 months ago
@reuthful white supremancy was the founding principle of the Confederacy. That comes from the words of the Confederate leaders. It is very possible that if the Condederacy had won slavery would have never ended.
LateKnight347 2 months ago
A person who uses four letter obscenities demonstrates not only emotion but also the extent of his vocabulary.
reuthful 7 months ago
Anybody ever wonder how the word "secession" got morphed into "rebellion"?. After all, for example Ordinances of Secession were intrinsically legal, unless and until ruled on by SCOTUS. Since the North won the subsequent WAR, it could call "secession", "rebellion", and make it look as if it were supressing an illegal, treasonous act. This made its resupply of Fort Sumter, a 'casus belli', look very unlike the act of Lincolnian Northern Aggression that it was.
reuthful 7 months ago
@reuthful well, you know what they say, 'you have to break a few eggs to make an omlette'. i like the outcome of the civil war. because of that war, with the north winning, we are now a great, great nation. or would you prefer to live in a weaker csa?
stanbrekston 7 months ago
black slaves were competing against white IRISH labour/slaves
komani5322 11 months ago
Go read the Southern Ultimatums. What the SOuthern leaders demanded, under threat of war. Southern newspapers such as the RIchmond Enquirer March 21, 1861, or any other Southern newspaper of that time. The Southern ULtimatums also appeared in New York papers.
All five of the SOuthern Ultimatums were about ONE thing -- the SPREAD of slavery, against the will of the people and states.
Go read the Southern Ultimatums.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
FIrst of all -- the dumb fuck starts off with a lie (in the video dialog) --- some shit about 'the South believed that the North would stop at NOTHING to end slavery"
What total dog dig shit. Are you fucking NUTS? You shit eating moron, that wasn't it at all.
The Southern leaders FUCKING SAID why -- in their ultimatums you stupid shit. Yes, ULTIMATUMS from the South -
What did the South demand? Their Ultimatums were for the VIOLENT SPREAD OF SLAVERY.
Got that you fuck tards?
NavyBeer 1 year ago
@NavyBeer hey guys; leave navybeer alone. he's obviously feeling attacked and trying to use his "big boy words" he learned during that sleep over at coach's house. haha. you use a lot of big words there, Miss Beer (i'm assuming you're single); it makes you sound really intelligent...especially when you CAPITALIZE words every SO OFTEN. have a nice day, ma'am :B
rajkamalnhs 1 year ago
Can anyone point me to some resources to what social aspects lead to the American Civil War? (Social; not political; not economical) Thank you!
AltaRepublic 1 year ago
@AltaRepublic I have resources, but not videos.
Coffeeisnecessary 9 months ago
@kglenn86 you can't prove shit moron -- see the Southern Ultimatums, retard. Your Southern Leaders issued them. Your SOuthern newspapers headlines called them THE TRUE ISSUE
Do you know what the Southern Ultimatums - by Southern Leaders -- were?
The SPREAD of slavery. Got that? That is what you leaders said, and your newspapers reported in headlines as "THE TRUE ISSUE"
Go read your own speeches, ultimatums, and papers
NavyBeer 1 year ago
Hmm, wish blacks where still slaves now I need my grass cut and i'm to lazy to do it myself.
Maybe one day.
vtrsucks 1 year ago
@vtrsucks hey vtrsucks, go up to the biggest blackest guy you see & tell that to his face. then see how far that gets you smart guy
stanbrekston 7 months ago
I am a Civil War buff.
I found these videos to be very interesting.
Thank you.
George Vreeland Hill
GeorgeVreelandHill 1 year ago
civilwar.wikia.com is a new civil war wiki and needs some help to get started! please come help
edward130603 1 year ago
Slavery caused the civil war? Give me a break. Why not talk about the fact that the South left the Union due to Lincolns tyrannical tax which forced 80% of all The United States taxes to be levied from the south. The southern states left the union primarily due to their desire to protect their rights to not be taxed unfairly by a tyrannical government which violated their rights.
themagus187 1 year ago
@themagus187 you are 100% right! unfortunately kids in school are still being taught wrongly in their history books that it was all on slavery, fkn self interested politicians
italstallion06 1 year ago
@italstallion06 if you don't know it was about slavery, you are an idiot. The South said so -- over and over. To the South, it was about their right to SPREAD slavery according to Gods will. To the NOrth, it was about stopping the illegal rebellion.
The south bragged it was about slavery at the time. Once they lost, they made up different excuses
NavyBeer 1 year ago
@themagus187 what a dumb fuck you are. First, Jefferson Davis himself said the tax had NOTHING to do with it. Got that retard - thats from your president.
Second dumb fuck --Lincoln didn't even pass that tax retard, it was passed a few days before he got there. The SOuth had ALREADY had 7 states secede you stupid fuck --- BEFORE the law passed. DO you grasp that you stupid fuck.
Read what the SOUTH said about it -- at the time. They said SLAVERY -- over and over and over.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
Lincoln wasn't going the kick slave owners for no legal reason - a person couldn't have been born a slave after the passage of the 5th Amd rights to Life, Liberty and Property for all persons, reguardless of what the Supreme Court said a truth is a thruth . The 5th Amendment was an Amendment to the US Constitution ... the fugitive slave act of 1793 was not, it violated the 5th Amd for those born after 1791
dizzo95 1 year ago
@dizzo95 I agree no one was legally a slave, and certainly the treatment of slaves was illegal and unconstitutional. The USSC, in Dred Scott, issued a corrupt and illegal ruling -- very likely they wrote what Davis and other slave leaders instructed them too. Lincoln accused them of this -- House Divided Speech.
But the South was shitting all over the Constitution -- and trying to SPREAD slavery even more. That's why Lincooln had to push back and not let the fucks spread slavery.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
@dizzo95
NavyBeer 1 year ago
This video couldn't cram more half truths and cliches in if they tried. The South didnt fucking worry about Lincoln trying to end slavery you fucking idiot. Llincoln was bending over backwards PROMISING NOT to, retard, and had ALWAYS been VERY outspoken against any military force to stop slavery You fuck tard, LInclolns big thig was to prevent any SPREAD of slavery. If you don't fucking grasp that, then go fucking stick your head up your ass.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
correct if I am wrong but the South was not all Formally (legally) seceded from the North, right ? S.Carolina-yes but the others ?
in which case the reason for the war was not secession but an illegal terrorist attack on Sumpter.
KLguy133 1 year ago
KL-- the entire secession thing was illegal. There is no clear way to secede, but here is what is NOT legal --- and what they did. Killing voters for daring to vote --not allowing real elections in most of the South, threatening the capital, attacking 12, not 1, fort, and using violence and threats for decades. If they hang voters now, stop elections now, threaten the capital now - we will kick their ass again.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
@NavyBeer I know there are clear connections to the present but I am only interested in the historical contents so keep clam dude.
Anyway, what was the legal way to secede ? a referendum ?
KLguy133 1 year ago
@KLguy133 legal way would be to get Congress to agree to it, I guess. Or pass a Constitutional Amendment. There is no set way. But its NOT to attack 12 forts, kill voters, loot treasuries and armories, threaten the capital, stop free speech for 40 years, stop real elections. That is what the SOuth was doing.
The Southern leaders were violent men, used to getting their way by violence and threats. They were bullies.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
@NavyBeer
You would never get a majority, the South simply get outvoted. Called dictatorship by democracy,you dipshit.
KLguy133 1 year ago
@KLguy133 Well dictator of democracy is better than slavery, you stupid fuck. But we have checks and balances to prevent mob rule type democracy.
Of course, the South had power by one group - slave owners. They didn't allow free speech, didnt even allow real elections.
the South used violence because they knew Kansas was against slavery 50-1.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
@NavyBeer Ho drink some more beer and fall of your nave boot and dround your dumb ass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
cindy5able 1 year ago
@cindy5able Learn some history, read the South's own speeches, threats, ultimatums at the time, dumb ass.,
The promises to attack, if slavery was not spread -- by Southern leaders.
The Southern newspapers headlines, callling the SPREAD of slavery "THE TRUE ISSUE"
The official ultimatums by Southern leaders calling for the SPREAD OF SLAVERY.
Learn the history they have hidden.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NavyBeer Ho drink some more beer and fall of your nave boat and dround your dumb ass!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
cindy5able 1 year ago
@KLguy133 what are the "clear connections" to the present?
Are Southern states invading other states with killers and thugs, to spread slavery? Are they trying to terrorize Kansas, who was against slavery 98% to 2%, to accept slavery or die?
Are Southern States promising war if their candidate loses?
Are Southern states killing voters, threatening the capital?
What the fuck clear connections are you talking about?
NavyBeer 1 year ago
1st, there is information in the Constitution regarding slavery; like the 3/5 clause. Slavery was not outlawed until after the Civil War.
2nd, Most of the founding fathers were opposed to slavery. Of those who chose to comment on the matter, only 2 were in favor.
Dauntless07 1 year ago
3rd, Lincoln certainly did not support the slaves over the aristocracy. When their land was divided up and given to the freed slaves, Lincoln had them driven off at bayonet point
4th, the last slave to walk the streets of Richmond was owned by someone from the north. Maybe you've heard of Grant?
Dauntless07 1 year ago
5th, the north was just as racist as the north. Do you think the Confederates came up with slavery just because they were evil? NO! Slavery just wasn't practical in the north. It wasn't out of any higher morality at all.
6th, the south only did what all people have done in all of human history; that includes Africansby the way.
Dauntless07 1 year ago
Oops, I meant just as racist as the south. typo.
Dauntless07 1 year ago
Dauntless -- wrong idiot Slavery was in Maryland, Delaware -- Missouir The climate was no fucking different in Ohio, Illinois But scum sucking pigs had control of slave states idiot. And only the Confederacy -- in all of history - was literally FOUNDED on "the great moral truth" that God ordained slavery. The Southern leaders BRAGGED about that, idiot. Learn real history.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
Dauntless dumb fuck -- slavery is not mentioned in the Constitution until it was prohibited. Got that retard? But here is what IS mentioned -- freedom of speech, which the South shit on for 2 generations, freedom of press, which the S shit on, real elections, which the South shit on, no cruel punishment, which the South shit on. Learn read history, idiot.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
blahblahblah dumb fuck, blahblahblah dumb fuck, x5
You've got good points, I'll give you that, but your catchphrase is a little annoying...
Dauntless07 1 year ago
So you said Confederates weren't Nazi like because no genocide? They were about to - if they could. Their leaders OPENLY talked about genocide - "killing our negroes with our own hands"" said one governor, if they had to free them.
And - many blacks were slaughtered, outright, by Southern scum after the war. But Blacks were now armed - and fighting back. Whites were scared shitless of blacks, if it was remotely a fair fight - whites ran, hid.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
By the way, sock account is obvious...
-BullshipDetector
-SouthernFriedHoney
-12FlyMe
If anyone finds anymore, feel free to post them,
LOL!
Dauntless07 1 year ago
In fact, the only reason the South didn't go into genocide mode - -as many of them had said they would do -- is that blacks got guns. Blacks were armed. Blacks started to fight back. Whites were fucking TERRIFIED of blacks after the war. Fucking scared shitless, which is EXACTLY why the pussies wore mask, a la KKK. Blacks learned how to kick ass - and whites knew it, and were terrified.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
A Person couldn't have been born a slave after passage of the Bill of Rights in 1791 ? that was why Congress passed the Fugitive slave law in 1793 it didn't amend the Bill of Rights so a person couldn't legally have been born a slave under the US Constition after 1791 but criminals won. and On October 20, 1774
" The articles of the Continental Association imposed an immediate ban on ... the slave trade) "
Wikipedia
dizzo95 1 year ago
Dizzo - excellent point In fact, slavery was unconstitutional, and illegal, from 1791 on,, and many people said so at the time. Only by shitting, stomping, and pissing on the Constitution did the South keep slavery. They used cruel and unusual punishment -- which is against constitution They stopped free press and speech - against the constitution. There was NOTHING in constituion allowing anyone to sell a child, rape a slave, torture run aways, ect
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
This is really good. A lot of important stuff covered in only 1:20
julia17long 1 year ago
See what Professor Kevin MacDonald says about Jews using diversity as a tool to rule over White America. Google kevin macdonald blog
jeffmaylor 1 year ago
Sadly this was anything but a short and glorious war and unfortunately there were very few people at that time who knew that going into the war.
oompaloompa42005 2 years ago
Thank God the North won. The South had some nerve to beat someone because they are black, in front of God 's eyes. I may be from Texas,but I say death to the rebels.
Kyle95USA 2 years ago
Kyle -- oh shit it went way beyond beating blacks. They burned them to death if they fought back. Whipped the shit out of them for "bad attitude" or for complaining when their children were sold.
Read what was really going on in slavery -- it was hell on earth. For some reason, much of that shit has been covered up or forgotten.
Read the slave autobiographies or even the letters and diaries of slave owners. Beatings were the least of it.
12FlyMe 2 years ago
ok here is some advice FIRST! learn your history
SECOND! im not from America (thank god)
THIRDLY if you cant speak to somebody without calling them a dumb fuck.. especially when they are stating facts then you should have stayed in your shitty comprehensive.
ConCon75 2 years ago 5
lol!
This is propaganda, im almost 100% sure lincoln promised he WOULDNT free the slaves.
ConCon75 2 years ago
Con dumb fuck -- Lincoln said his intention was to kill slavery by stopping its grown, but that he had no legal authority or ability to use force to end it.
But guess what dumb fuck? When you dumb fucks attacked US troops and started the war --that changed everything dumb fuck.
He did the Emancipation Proclamation -- then he helped pass the 13th AMendment dumb fuck. He kicked slavers ass just like he said they deserved.
12FlyMe 2 years ago
Meet dumb fuck -- sorry idiot - that wasn't Northern leaders dumb fuck -- that was southern scum trying to hold on to their slave pussy and power.
Lincoln and the North rejected that shit dumb fuck. You lost your slaves, you lost your pussy, you lost your power, and you fucks have been crying about it for 150 years.
ItchMyFoot 2 years ago
well what a mess you've all made of this,
you Americans live in the most open, and privileged society in the world, you defend your rights and freedoms with zeal and gusto.
So for what ever reason, beyond my ken, you equally decide to drag yourselves down to pointless arguments about nothing, the American Civil War was fought for good good reasons at the time, thats 1861-65, this is 2009,
You are a strong country, no looking back, you should look forward to a stronger you.
tangodancer1603 2 years ago 10
@tangodancer1603 Word to moms yo...
AltaRepublic 1 year ago
Lincoln was only against slavery because France staunchly opposed such an institution. Lincoln used this cause to obtain an alliance with France. He was not as pure in intention or as saintly as most would like to believe. Let's not even start with what he did the American Indians.
Lynnicus 2 years ago
Kind of like George W Bush giving hundreds of milliions of dollars and industry that belongs in the USA to countries in exchange for putting US troops so he could launch his world domination war that has failed miserably. Nobody has learned from the past because everyone's too busy pointing fingers trying to find the source to place the blame on
lrsu31c 2 years ago
Lynnicuss dumb fuck
No dumb fuck - Lincoln was against slavery because it was vile shit -- and he said so dumb fuck.
Lincoln said those who sold slaves should be kicked to death - and he was right. Kicking to death was a good way for slave sellers to die.
It didnt have anything to do with the French dumb fuck. It had to do with the slave rapers and child sellers.
ItchMyFoot 2 years ago
Confederacy was based on stuff the Nazis were too timid to say -- white men should enslave black men the world over.
Davis and Stephens both bragged that GOD intended whites to enslave blacks -- Stephens said whites all over the world would learn from the Confederates to enslave blacks like GOD intended.
They bragged that the FOUNDATION of COnfederacy was to enslave the inferior blacks, as God intened.
Funny how you lunatics dont dare say what your Southern Leaders bragged about.
ItchMyFoot 2 years ago
and Davis did just like the Nazi's did when the end was near: run like hell and hide like a little coward rat
lrsu31c 2 years ago
You also forget to tell of the Northern Leaders in Congress passing a Amendment to the US Constitution that would allow Slavery forever.... funny how you lunatics only tell part of the story.
meetman3 2 years ago
HAHAHA! Does the word "nazi" work for you only to make loud statements to get attention?
Lachausis 2 years ago
Lach the word Nazi works you dumb fuck cause Nazi actions were very much like Confederate actions you idiot.
Both had slavery dumb fuck.
Both used extreme violence to put down any opposition dumb fuck.
Both denied all freedom of speech and press for any whites that disagreed dumb fuck.
Both lost every war they ever fought dumb fuck.
See how Nazis and Confederates were the same dumb fuck?
12FlyMe 2 years ago
HAHAHA! Typical race card whore. Be thankful that you were born in USA, where before your loud mouth was breathing there were hundreds of thousands "white nazis", that died for your freedom, while their (Irish for example) was still denied.
Lachausis 2 years ago
Yes Lach - whites and blacks fought the Nazi Confederates and beat them.
Plus dumb fuck -- the Confederates used slave labor to build every fortress they hid behind. The basic war was the pussy Confedertates hiding behind massive earth works they forced slaves to build.
Bunch of pussies. The South lost when so many of you pussies deserted, Lee had no army left.
Davis himself said 2/3 of your pussy soldiers deserted.
12FlyMe 2 years ago
@12FlyMe Wow, you must have gotten a F in your history class on world war 2. Nazis lost every war.....you really need to study history before you start saying things.
Kubelwagen 1 year ago
If you think Nazis won WW2 -- you need to check out Berlin after the Russians got thru with it.
12FlyMe 1 year ago
@12FlyMe There was only one War they were in, hint I copied what you said. You said that they lost every war, there was only one war they were in.
Kubelwagen 1 year ago
Yes they lost it
So did the Nazis. The Nazis lost every war they were in. The Confederates lost every war they were in.
They had nothing BUT war their entire existance, and lost. They were born by violence and died by violence.
They were both evil fucks.
Nazis and Confederates had a lot in common .
12FlyMe 1 year ago
@12FlyMe, Nazis and Confederates have NOTHING in common. I don't even know where to begin on their opposites "dumb fuck," so I'll ask you, how is being a confederate like being a Nazi?
Dauntless07 1 year ago
Dauntless dumb fuck -- Nazism was based on being in control of "inferior humans", almost exactly like Confederates. Nazis stopped free speech, free press-- so did the Confederates. But even Nazis didn't rape their slaves, then sell their OWN children into slavery, which was COMMON practice by men like Lee, Davis, ect. Nazis allowed no real elections -- either did Confederates.
But of the two groups, Nazis had more honor, vile as they were.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
@BullshipDetector, No, not like the Confederates at all...
-Confederates wern't gassing anyone they felt wasn't southern enough!
-Confederates did allow elections and the press, that's why immediately after they seceeded they declared all US laws that did not conflict with their secession were still valid. Sure, blacks wern't included, but do you really think laws in the north were any kinder?
Dauntless07 1 year ago
@Dauntless07 -Yes, some slave owners did pare their slaves and sell the children into slavery, but you are very NAIEVE to blieve no one was raped anyone in the Holocaust.
-Nazis had more honor? YOU SICKEN ME! They were nothing but bullies taking whatever hey wanted. The Confederate soldiers were defending their homes and families from what they perceved as an oppressive power.
-By your logic, the rebels of the American Revolution were worse than Nazis.
Dauntless07 1 year ago
Dauntless - slave rape was epidemic dumb fuck. ALmost half the slaves were born mixed race - do you think Casper the ghost fucked the mother, retard?
The Holocaust slaves were not being raped, dumb fuck. Perhaps isolated horney Nazis. But the Confederate leaders virtually all had fucked dozens, if not hundreds of slaves. And made a small fortune then selling their own children into slavery,
See the difference yet?
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
Daunt, yes, Nazis had more honor. They did not rape children, then sell their own offspring into slavery -- but the Slave owners almmost all did that. They did not torture women for running away -- slavery was founded on cruel violent punishment of people who ran away. Nazis did not burn to death men who fought back - burning to death slaves who rebelled was fun sport to the South.
See the difference yet dumb fuck?
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
Dauntless -- and I guess you didn't learn that the Southern slavers were promising to kill the slaves - genocide -- if the had to free them. Did you know that dumb fuck? Several governors openly discussed killing the slaves, if they had to free them. In fact, many slaves were butchered, hung, burned, shot, by the South, in attempted genocide. The Nazis were just more organized, but the evil was the same.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
Daunt wrong -- no elections dumb fuck. Lincoln wasn't even allowed on the ballot in 9 of 11 Southern States. Got that yet dumb fuck? OF the two states he WAS allowed on -- the slave owners simply didn't count his votes -- they just made up shit.
Do you know that West Virginia broke away from Virginia - because of this? No, you fucking don't know.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
too bad he freed slaves now i have todo my own laundry damnit....
EricHx85 2 years ago
wow what a terrible video, as misleading as possible
ukjw2 2 years ago 2
this is stupid
wackyhardcore 2 years ago
There is so much "wrong" history in this video, I wouldnt know where to start to correct it! What a MESS!!
meetman3 2 years ago
Can you tell me where to find correct information?? Thanks
jackofan91 2 years ago
Oops I meant comin from a slave owner. for lee
SgtZellmer 3 years ago
When that was put in the Declaration it didnt include blacks. People seem to forget that not only were many of our founding fathers slave owners but that at that time there was almost no notion anywhere that blacks were even human. They were enslaved in England and other parts of Europe, here in America and long before Europe and America in their native Africa. Africans had been enslaving Africans long before white men landed here. They created the market for the slave trade.
SgtZellmer 3 years ago 2
Abe Lincoln in that 1858 speech quoted , made a similar argument when he said : " there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness " 1858 After reading the 1858 speech I wasn't aware the Declaration of Independence also is a Law ? If Bill of Rights didn't apply to States why was slavery in Washington D.C. ? The right to own a slave person , was made up.
dizzo95 3 years ago
I agree. I dont know of anyplace it says in US legislation the people of the 19th century had the right to own slaves. However the fact is that most North or South didnt. I dont like to use many of Lincolns speeches anyway. He contrdicts himelf more than I can stand. There is one I just love he made about 12 years before secession where he openly says its a good right to have and that all people everywhere have it. The right to leave a government they no longer like that is.
SgtZellmer 3 years ago
As a psychoanalyst , there is something called the danger of fairy tales , because they become true, people act out what they hear or read. Abe Lincoln in 1858 was talking a lot about a civil war, then 3 years later look what happened. it would have been better to ask Congress to ban anyone being " born " into slavery . That should have happened before 1808-1820. John Adams opposed slavery because it was a "foul contagion in the human character" and "an evil of colossal magnitude. "
dizzo95 3 years ago
There were many pro and anti slavery people throughout American history. Its just given his actions from 1860-1865 I dont not see and real proof Lincoln was truly one of them agaisnt it. Gen. Lee said "Slavery is the political and social evil that plagues us all" Thats coming from a slave. Most whom he inherited ownership of when marrying his wife, however still.
SgtZellmer 3 years ago
Dizzo -- funny because you just crapped out a fairytale. No fucking kidding slavery SHOULD have ended before 1820. What was your first clue dumb fuck?
Not only was slaver evil shit -- it turned slave OWNERS into monsters. George Mason described the entire class of men "gentlemen class" who were monsters in disquise. Lee was one - whipping 14 year old girls, screaming at them during their torture, keeping a "hunting list" of slave women to capture/
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
@dizzo95 I suggest you hand in your shrink clown suit, and learn history.
Everyone was talking about civil war you retard. Are you saying Lincoln brought on the civil war by talking about it? How the FUCK do people get so stupid. Have you even BOTHERED to learn what the fuck the secessionst and slave rapers were saying? Did you ever fucking hear of the word context?
NavyBeer 1 year ago
@NavyBeer Why did South Carolina suceed from the Union in Dec 1860 Two Month before Lincoln took office ?
Because Lincoln had threatened aggressive action to enforce Black persons 5th Amendment Right to Libery - even if it ment civil war
dizzo95 1 year ago
Dizzo never heard that one. Show me where LIncoln ever did that? Lincoln was bending over fucking backwards, doing somersaults, and doing everything but helping slavers whip slaves, trying to placate the fucks on EVERYTHING except spreading slavery.
So so me this 5th AMendment stuff. I've never seen it
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
@BullshipDetector In 1774 1st Continental Congress Resolved, 1. That ( Englishmen) are entitled to life, liberty and property:
that was amended in 1791 with the Bill or Rights Fifth Amendment – that states : No person shall ....be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;...for ALL PERSONS that caused a problem because it ment a person could not be born a slave, and Congress passed the fugitive slave act of 1793
dizzo95 1 year ago
@BullshipDetector A Comment posted on here by LickMyFoot posted this quote or misquote:
" Lincoln said those who sold slaves should be kicked to death - and he was right. Kicking to death was a good way for slave sellers to die."
I didn't verify if that was a real quote from Lincoln
dizzo95 1 year ago
@BullshipDetector Ha Ha I thought you did write that too but I found the quote from LickMyFoot you wrote:
" Lincoln also said slave owners should be "kicked to death", though he phased it thusly "Those who treat the negro as mere merchandise to be sold, deserve nothing but kicking, contempt, and death". Astonising quote -- from Peoria 1854."
dizzo95 1 year ago
What the FUCK does that have to do with anything?
Yes, in 1854 Lincoln said slave owners should be kicked to death. But that's nothing to do with 5th Amendment. You are crazy.
SteamboatCamp 1 year ago
@dizzo95 Yes Lincoln hated slavery and said slave owners should be kicked to death. But he had no legal or moral or practial way to end slavery in the South. His goal was to stop its spread, like he said about 10,000 times,
But once he WAS able to end slavery, he sure as fuck did.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
Dizzo -- South Carolina SAID why -- and promised war all during the campaign if LIncoln was elected. Read their own documents.
What the hell are you talking about, "Linconl threated Aggressive Action to protect slaves rights". Is everyone on here FUCKING INSANE???? Gesus fucking Christ -- Lincoln was bending over BACKWARDS trying to appease the slave rapers on EVERYTHIGN but spreading slavery. What the fuck do you mean? Show me.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
@NavyBeer this is a quote from a poster on here BulD : " Lincoln also said slave owners should be "kicked to death", though he phased it thusly "Those who treat the negro as mere merchandise to be sold, deserve nothing but kicking, contempt, and death". Astonising quote -- from Peoria 1854. Yet no Lincoln hater will dare mention that."
dizzo95 1 year ago
@dizzo95 yes, In fact, Licoln's anti slavery quotes are extreme, often, and consistant. Even in the speeches Lincoln haters quote to show he didn't care about slaves -- Lincoln gives very powerful overall message that slavery must end, but admits he knows not how, other than to stop it's growth, and let it kill the host, like a cancer.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
Sgt dumb fuck - I suggest you read Lincoln's complete speeches - in order, dumb fuck/ NOt just the parts they slide up your dumb ass. Read the full speeches-- I very much doubt you can/
Read where he says slave owners should be "kicked to death" Got that dumb fuck? Kicked to DEATH. Lincoln didnt contradict himself dumb fuck - the Southern government WAS illegal, violent, fucks who should have been overthrown, idiot.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
Sgt dumb fuck- you probably think the Southern Governments were legal entities. They weren't. They had no real elections, they took over by violence and deciet. Do you fucking have any clue why West Virginia broke away from Virginia? Because the fucks in Virginia never allowed real elections. There was no free speech, in the south, no free press. The Nazi like government controlled what could be read, written, spoken.
And unless you know that, you are a dumb ass.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
Sgt do you know that Lincoln wasn't allowed on the ballot in 9 of 11 Southern States dumb ass? That was typical - becaause there WERE no real elections in the South. And in the two states he was allowed on - -the slavers just refused to count his votes. Got that retard? They had "Saddam" type elections, enslaved millions, raped millions, sold millions of children, and terrorized millions. Try that again dumb fuck and we will kick you ass again. Clear enough?
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
Sgt most of the South didn't own slaves? Well, the leaders almost ALL did. Very nearly 100% of the leaders in the South owned slaves outright -- and got rich on them -- or came from slave owning familiies. Those who had no connection with slavery -- didn't support the Confederates See the difference? Plus 50% of the families in SC owned slaves - and they were in charge, idiot. SO the ruling class was very much slavers.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
@BullshipDetector Thats true.
But the average guy fighting for the south's right to slavery wouldnt have owned one. SOmething like 4% of all southerners did.
Pawluk44 1 year ago
@Pawluk44 wrong idiot/ Something like 4% ?? You fucking idiot, 47% of the families owned slaves in SC. Virtually 100% of the Confederate leaders owned them or came from slave owning families -- grew up on slavery, the FUCKING entire social fabric, political ladder, EVERYTHING was slave status based you dumb fuck. 4% my fucking ass. Its 4 percent if you count all the North, and the slaves, and stick truth up your ass and shit on it.
NavyBeer 1 year ago
@SgtZellmer you are one dumb fuck. First of all retard, I bet you never read a complete LIincoln speech in your life. Read any one of the LIncoln Douglas debates, all the way through. Or his Peoria speech. You dumb fuck need to learn something about context.
Yes dumb fuck - you have the right to revolt - and thats what was done - a revolution against the scum sucking slavers.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
@SgtZellmer you never read a complete Lincoln speech, except the Gettysburg. YOu should learn something about context. Lincoln would give the racists just enough to pacify them, then clobber the living fuck out of slavery --- saying slave owners should be kicked to death. Since you dont understand what Lincoln was dealing with, you don't know how he outfoxed the slave raping, child selling scum, kicked their ass, kicked their Gods ass, and forever changed history
NavyBeer 1 year ago
no it want
vanmeterstar 2 years ago
Dizzo right. Slavery was always illegal. And the treatment of slaves was illegal. Cruel and unusual punishment was banned in the Bill of Rights. The South of course regularly used cruel punishment. Free press, free speech, is part of Bill of rights. The South regularly shit on that -- including stopping free speech and press for whites. The Southern government controlled what WHITE people could read, write, say. They were fucking Nazi like fucks.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
Dizzo Lincoln also said slave owners should be "kicked to death", though he phased it thusly "Those who treat the negro as mere merchandise to be sold, deserve nothing but kicking, contempt, and death". Astonising quote -- from Peoria 1854. Yet no Lincoln hater will dare mention that.
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
Sgt wrong dumb fuck - -the Declaration of INdependec said ALL Men are created equal idiot. The guy who WROTE it said it meant all men.
No dumb fuck- the slaves hhere were not enslaved in AFricaa retard. 95% of them weren't even BORN in Africa dumb fuck.
So some africans enslaved others? Some Irish butt fucked babies, too. SO what. Does that mean your dumb fucking ass should create a country, BASED on butt fucking babies, retard? What the fuck is your logic, retard?
BullshipDetector 1 year ago
Hmm I got mine off of his 1861 inaugural address. When people actually cared at all about what he was going to do with slavery because only then was he in a position to do anything at all about it. By that I mean maybe try and push for the complete abolition of it. Of course he didnt which is very strange. Why didnt he push for such legislation in 61 or 62? Lincoln did make a pretty pro-slavery and anti-black speech in 1858 though.
SgtZellmer 3 years ago
Was the right to own slaves in the U.S. made up ? There is nothing that I can find holding the original Bill if Rights that allows someone to own another person. On Ebay I bought a replica of the Original United States Bill of Rights and Constitution dated 1789 it says in:
" Article the seventh [5th Amendment]
No person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;.. "
The Bill of Rights does not say anything about the right to own slave persons.
dizzo95 3 years ago
Well thats off topic we were talking about Lincoln. However where is there any wording that even hints to people of that day believing blacks are even human? There arent in the Declaration or the Constitution back then. There was little or no notion they were even people.
SgtZellmer 3 years ago
My next post will a quote from ol not so honest Abe. Sorry it doesnt have quotations but the damn size requirments. Here it is Abraham Lincoln speaking at the Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois on September 18th 1858. Now after reading it are we all to undertsand that this man had a revelation of sorts in the early 1860s? I dont think so. This was before the war before he had to take advantage of slaves position to maintain support for his unjust war.
SgtZellmer 3 years ago
I wil say then that I am not nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people and I will also say that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality
SgtZellmer 3 years ago
continued:"I do not believe the two races can co-exist in any way without the titles of Inferior and Superior being assigned to each race, I as much as any other white man would like the title of Superior to stay assigned to the white race" Hmm that means blacks should be assigned Inferior. That was the whole basis behind any slavey in the worlds history. That the enslaved were either less human or just not human all together. Calling blacks "Inferior" incites just that belief. What a great guy
SgtZellmer 3 years ago
Lol what a crock. Abolitionists had to fight like hell to get Lincoln to even consider the EP. When he agreed to draft one it tacfully freed no one. Since as he had maintained that wasnt what the war was over. It didnt even affect the whole CSA. Parts of Virginia where and other states where Union forces were in control were left out. So was the whole state of Tennessee. "I have no intent nor do I feel I have any lawful right to interfere with or abolish the institution of slavery"-Ol Abe 1861.
SgtZellmer 3 years ago
and the quote continues..." but I hold that, notwithstanding all this, there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness " Ol Abe same speech 1858
dizzo95 3 years ago
The Emancipation Proclamation freed only those slaves in the Confederate states. It did not free slaves in those northern states where slavery was legal.
texman81 3 years ago 3
The North would stop at nothing to end slavery? Wow, now there's a load of propaganda for you.
KurtPila1 3 years ago
Thank you 4 understanding. All three of you. Esspecially RosstaPharian! The Civil War was not about slavery.
CammiedCSA 4 years ago
The Civil War was not about slavery. Get your facts right, buddy.
RosstaPharian 4 years ago
Can you guys do a documentary about the Reconstruction?
ghetto101mimi 4 years ago
can some plz upload a hall documentary about the american civil war
gryffo02 4 years ago