The next kingdom is the legs of iron, the great and terrible beast, and the little horn Dan.2:40;7:7;8:9-11 (see also Gen.3:15;Rev.12:9,3-5)= Imperial Rome.
THe question is after three parallel prophecies of Daniel showing the consecutive Kingdoms of Babylon, MedoPersia, Greecia, and Imperial Rome would the next kingdom of Antichrist or Antichrist not follow Imperial Rome?????
Imperial Rome ruled from BC168-AD476. Which kingdom in history follows Imperial Rome? The Papacy, a little KINGDOM.
Whether you know it or not you are teaching the Jesuit theory futurism by Francisco Ribera.And as Jesus said,Do ye not therefore err,because ye know not the scriptures,neither the power of God?Mt.12:24.And dont forget Daniel 8&9 are speaking of the same time prophecy so please do not make the 2,300 days literal this is ,Preterism by Luis de Alcaraz SJ.
Luther,Melancthan,Calvin,Knox,Wesley,R.Williams, Th.Jefferson and many more believed and proved scripturally that the Papacy was theAntichrist.
I agree that Rev. speaks of the future but there are many parts of Rev. that have already meet there fulfillment. For example, Rev.12:3-5, Jesus being persecuted by Imperial Rome at his birth has all ready taken place. He has also already been caught up to His fathers throne. To say that Rev. is yet future is to broad of a comment. On the other hand I do believe there is a great deal to be fulfilled. Like the Papacy coming back to world power 13:3,4, the NWO, the 7 last plaques etc...
See, now that's better. You are trying...good. Ok...many have mistakenly put the Papacy as the antichrist, due to the FACT that the Roman Catholic Church for generations has killed true Christians, but it is not. The Antichrist IS a single person. The son of perdition. I DO believe that the pope AT THAT TIME will be the false prophet. More to come...
If the Antichrist is yet future you make Paul a lier. In 2:3,4 describes the Antichrist calling him the man of sin. In verse 7 he says, it "doth already work". If he is just one man how can he live from the time of Paul to today. Your videos on the Antichrist make no sense. What is the purpose of being called a Protestant if you forget what and who the protest was all about?
From the get go your theory is flawed. That is the core of your problem. You have started with a satanic idea and you are trying to make the Holy scriptures FIT. They do NOT! As a result of this, you cannot understand any of the prophecy of the scripture.
Please respond in a Christian way with the Bible and deal with the issues presented. Its unchristian to make fun of another Christian but sometimes is the case when you have no Bible to support your theory then insults are hurled. I respect you even though I do not agree with you please extend the same courtesy. Thank you!
Please response to the contextual point about of WHEN Jesus became Messiah (use your Bible PLEASE)
If in Dan.9:25 is the commandment to restore and build Jerusalem is given by Antichrist at the end of time you have a very big problem contextually in D.9:25.When did Jesus become Messiah the Prince? Messiah means the annointed one in Hebrew.Christ in the greek means the annointed one. Messiah=Christ. Jesus was annointed by the Holy Ghost Acts10:38. BUT WHEN was Jesus annointed by the H.G. and become MESSIAH? Mt.3:16,17 - AT HIS BAPTISM. Therefore you my friend are out of context with scripture.
Daniel 9:25 "Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times."
This command is given by Artaxerxes in his 20th year, for the rebuilding of the city...You can see Neh.2:1-8 for that. And Yeshua Ha'Masciach, from EVERLASTING is our God, and of course ALWAYS "Messiah the Prince".
ApoclapoGospel you then met the scriptural ascertion that the Antichrist is commanded to go forth with the opening of the First Seal with this..."Are you saying against the wait of evidence in Daniel 8&9 that Antichrist gives the commandment to restore and rebuilt Jerusalem in Dan.9:25"
You see what you did? You IGNORED what I responded and made a statement to answer a question that only you heard in your head.
Do you know Yeshua Ha'Maschiach as your LORD and Saviour?
Apococa Gospel you said..."Jesus ascend to His fathers throne in AD31 when the first seal was opened." That is PURE Romanism. as in Roman Catholicism. Because ANY true student of scripture knows that the opening of the first seal is met with the command for the Antichrist to go forth
There is no scripture that connects the first seal with command to restore and rebuild Jerusalem. You make the false assertion the book with 7 seals is the same as the sealing in Daniel. AGAIN this is false! What was sealed is the 2,300day/year prophecy D.12:9,4;8:26.14. THIS IS A PLAIN THUS SAITH THE LORD. I believe you meet to say, ANY false student of scripture knows that the opening of the first sela is met with the cmdnd.
I am saying that your whole conjecture is false. Your whole hypothesis is whacked out. THAT is what I am saying. The only people you might be able to take in with this tripe are individuals who REALLY don't know the Bible.
Allow me to clarify. Jesus ascend to His fathers throne in AD31 when the first seal was opened. The seal in Daniel was not opened until the time of the end (TOTE). When is the TOTE? D.12:6,7 - times,time, and dividing of time (TTDT) are finished. What is TTDT? Rev.12:14,6- 1,260 days/years (num.14:34;Eze.4:6)from AD538-1798 in which Papal Rome ruled the world religious and political. Therefore the TOTE is 1798 and would makeit biblical impossible to be the same as the book with 7 seals. God blss
You wrote "Jesus ascend to His fathers throne in AD31 when the first seal was opened. " ABSOLUTELY WRONG! DEAD WRONG! With the opening of the First Seal, it is the imitator, the Antichrist who is GIVEN the command to go. To say that this IS Yehshua Ha'Maschiach is blasphemy...nope...NEXT!
Its interesting your interpretation on the book with seven seals connected to the book that was sealed in Daniel. In Revelation the book is written within and on the backside, Rev.5:1. The book in Rev. has seven seals, Rev.5:1. The book in Daniel is neither sealed seven times or written without. Further more this book is unsealed after Jesus ascends into heaven, Rev.4,5 and is parallel to the churches.
Praise be to God & Jesus Christ for accepting His Holy Death on the Cross & be available again for us -- For HE alone is Worthy...The Lamb is Worthy! Alleluia!
OOOH, I just love spooky stories!!!!!!!
Mrphatbastard1 1 year ago
i love it. thanks for the support on our way back home
Fromdakold326 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The next kingdom is the legs of iron, the great and terrible beast, and the little horn Dan.2:40;7:7;8:9-11 (see also Gen.3:15;Rev.12:9,3-5)= Imperial Rome.
THe question is after three parallel prophecies of Daniel showing the consecutive Kingdoms of Babylon, MedoPersia, Greecia, and Imperial Rome would the next kingdom of Antichrist or Antichrist not follow Imperial Rome?????
Imperial Rome ruled from BC168-AD476. Which kingdom in history follows Imperial Rome? The Papacy, a little KINGDOM.
ApocalypticGospel 3 years ago
Whether you know it or not you are teaching the Jesuit theory futurism by Francisco Ribera.And as Jesus said,Do ye not therefore err,because ye know not the scriptures,neither the power of God?Mt.12:24.And dont forget Daniel 8&9 are speaking of the same time prophecy so please do not make the 2,300 days literal this is ,Preterism by Luis de Alcaraz SJ.
Luther,Melancthan,Calvin,Knox,Wesley,R.Williams, Th.Jefferson and many more believed and proved scripturally that the Papacy was theAntichrist.
ApocalypticGospel 3 years ago
The Papacy is NOT the Antichrist! No system is the Antichrist.
The Book of Revelation is YET future. I am growing tired of your insanity...so start making sense
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
I agree that Rev. speaks of the future but there are many parts of Rev. that have already meet there fulfillment. For example, Rev.12:3-5, Jesus being persecuted by Imperial Rome at his birth has all ready taken place. He has also already been caught up to His fathers throne. To say that Rev. is yet future is to broad of a comment. On the other hand I do believe there is a great deal to be fulfilled. Like the Papacy coming back to world power 13:3,4, the NWO, the 7 last plaques etc...
ApocalypticGospel 3 years ago
See, now that's better. You are trying...good. Ok...many have mistakenly put the Papacy as the antichrist, due to the FACT that the Roman Catholic Church for generations has killed true Christians, but it is not. The Antichrist IS a single person. The son of perdition. I DO believe that the pope AT THAT TIME will be the false prophet. More to come...
Watch my video..."Who is NOT the Antichrist"
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
If the Antichrist is yet future you make Paul a lier. In 2:3,4 describes the Antichrist calling him the man of sin. In verse 7 he says, it "doth already work". If he is just one man how can he live from the time of Paul to today. Your videos on the Antichrist make no sense. What is the purpose of being called a Protestant if you forget what and who the protest was all about?
ApocalypticGospel 3 years ago
I find it unbelievable that you know SO many verses but still don't know the scripture...
It's Christmas Eve my friend. We will continue this Friday. Have a Blessed Christmas my Brother!
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
The issue is interpretation which you do not have a clue about just many WILD applications.
I pray that you had a blessed Christmas as well!
ApocalypticGospel 3 years ago
Apocococo,
From the get go your theory is flawed. That is the core of your problem. You have started with a satanic idea and you are trying to make the Holy scriptures FIT. They do NOT! As a result of this, you cannot understand any of the prophecy of the scripture.
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
Please respond in a Christian way with the Bible and deal with the issues presented. Its unchristian to make fun of another Christian but sometimes is the case when you have no Bible to support your theory then insults are hurled. I respect you even though I do not agree with you please extend the same courtesy. Thank you!
Please response to the contextual point about of WHEN Jesus became Messiah (use your Bible PLEASE)
ApocalypticGospel 3 years ago
If in Dan.9:25 is the commandment to restore and build Jerusalem is given by Antichrist at the end of time you have a very big problem contextually in D.9:25.When did Jesus become Messiah the Prince? Messiah means the annointed one in Hebrew.Christ in the greek means the annointed one. Messiah=Christ. Jesus was annointed by the Holy Ghost Acts10:38. BUT WHEN was Jesus annointed by the H.G. and become MESSIAH? Mt.3:16,17 - AT HIS BAPTISM. Therefore you my friend are out of context with scripture.
ApocalypticGospel 3 years ago
Daniel 9:25 "Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times."
This command is given by Artaxerxes in his 20th year, for the rebuilding of the city...You can see Neh.2:1-8 for that. And Yeshua Ha'Masciach, from EVERLASTING is our God, and of course ALWAYS "Messiah the Prince".
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
ApoclapoGospel you then met the scriptural ascertion that the Antichrist is commanded to go forth with the opening of the First Seal with this..."Are you saying against the wait of evidence in Daniel 8&9 that Antichrist gives the commandment to restore and rebuilt Jerusalem in Dan.9:25"
You see what you did? You IGNORED what I responded and made a statement to answer a question that only you heard in your head.
Do you know Yeshua Ha'Maschiach as your LORD and Saviour?
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
Apococa Gospel you said..."Jesus ascend to His fathers throne in AD31 when the first seal was opened." That is PURE Romanism. as in Roman Catholicism. Because ANY true student of scripture knows that the opening of the first seal is met with the command for the Antichrist to go forth
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
There is no scripture that connects the first seal with command to restore and rebuild Jerusalem. You make the false assertion the book with 7 seals is the same as the sealing in Daniel. AGAIN this is false! What was sealed is the 2,300day/year prophecy D.12:9,4;8:26.14. THIS IS A PLAIN THUS SAITH THE LORD. I believe you meet to say, ANY false student of scripture knows that the opening of the first sela is met with the cmdnd.
ApocalypticGospel 3 years ago
I am saying that your whole conjecture is false. Your whole hypothesis is whacked out. THAT is what I am saying. The only people you might be able to take in with this tripe are individuals who REALLY don't know the Bible.
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
Allow me to clarify. Jesus ascend to His fathers throne in AD31 when the first seal was opened. The seal in Daniel was not opened until the time of the end (TOTE). When is the TOTE? D.12:6,7 - times,time, and dividing of time (TTDT) are finished. What is TTDT? Rev.12:14,6- 1,260 days/years (num.14:34;Eze.4:6)from AD538-1798 in which Papal Rome ruled the world religious and political. Therefore the TOTE is 1798 and would makeit biblical impossible to be the same as the book with 7 seals. God blss
ApocalypticGospel 3 years ago
You wrote "Jesus ascend to His fathers throne in AD31 when the first seal was opened. " ABSOLUTELY WRONG! DEAD WRONG! With the opening of the First Seal, it is the imitator, the Antichrist who is GIVEN the command to go. To say that this IS Yehshua Ha'Maschiach is blasphemy...nope...NEXT!
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
Its interesting your interpretation on the book with seven seals connected to the book that was sealed in Daniel. In Revelation the book is written within and on the backside, Rev.5:1. The book in Rev. has seven seals, Rev.5:1. The book in Daniel is neither sealed seven times or written without. Further more this book is unsealed after Jesus ascends into heaven, Rev.4,5 and is parallel to the churches.
ApocalypticGospel 3 years ago
First off...we are not told what Daniel used to seal the Book OR how many of whatever he used. So, don't use strawman arguments here.
Also, your statement "Further more this book is unsealed after Jesus ascends into heaven, Rev.4,5 and is parallel to the churches"...Makes NO sense!
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
Praise be to God & Jesus Christ for accepting His Holy Death on the Cross & be available again for us -- For HE alone is Worthy...The Lamb is Worthy! Alleluia!
luap123311 3 years ago 3
Amen and AMEN!
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
Keep teaching brother.
May our LORD Jesus come soon, and may we look for His coming and purify ourselves through His Spirit in us until that time.
God bless.
1wingsolja 3 years ago
Thank you very much for the kind words. Yes, I believe the Lord's "coming FORTH" is VERY close!
Praise the LORD!
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
You are doing a miraculous job! Love you man!
God Bless
JYDrummer12 3 years ago
Well Thank you for the kind words...and Praise the LORD! Help spread the video around, if you haven't...
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
Great episode.
shiningcross 3 years ago
Thank you for the kind words, and Praise the LORD!
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
Wonderful!!!! This one gave me chills. :-)
piscesR2cool 3 years ago
This is great stuff, isn't it! Praise the LORD for all things!
Thundercrack3 3 years ago
Thank you and Praise the LORD!
Thundercrack3 3 years ago