YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

she is a damn Neo-con!!!

delhobre 3 years ago

stop using other words for the same meanings bitch.

lol

Hilawly? Socialism?

Where are you people getting that from?

Hillary is honest and genuine, at least. Obama is too much of an idealist and it's not 1960s. Also, obama is supposedly to be always positive and peaceful but his campaign's managers are bitches and jerks. They are bitching out loud on tv every night...how consistent is that? at least Hillary says things as they are. Something is fake here and although i like moving speeches, I'm voting for experience. I need this woman at the white house for a change. peace.

Sergio022s 3 years ago

The greatest monsters in History were honest and genuine. None of them had their power limited.

antoniocostaamaral 3 years ago

i dont pay attention in this kind of mean spirited comments. Having a vote and thinking carefully of where to give it is important for each democracy. I dont consider this woman a monster no matter what you say. I just made an informed decision of what i have in front of me as an independent person and a military dude. The set of choices is limited. Obama never served this country, he has no idea. McCain can't handle economy...so, it's a simple equation. I want her to win!

Sergio022s 3 years ago

I didn't call her a monster, I'm saying that being honest and genuine is no guarantee of respecting the people's right to be left alone by the government.

antoniocostaamaral 3 years ago

that is true but it's more of a philosophical orientation of the democratic party rather than the person. Also, i'm not sure we are in the best possible point in our history to expect to be left "alone". my previous comment goes to hillary's haters then ,not you.

Sergio022s 3 years ago

I have nothing against the individual, only against the socialism she advocates.

antoniocostaamaral 3 years ago

at least her "socialism" is adapted to meet the newly emerged needs of the American people. I can't see other alternative models , responsive enought to have some value for the average american. sorry. Obama's plan is not ocnvincing to me. I love daydreaming but without money this is not easy to do :) Hillary is the pragmatist.

Sergio022s 3 years ago

Socialism doesn't meet needs. It forces 'meeting of needs' to the people. 'To each according to his need' is a motto that has been experimented everywhere, with failure and misery as a result. Real socialists should defend the civil right of individuals not to be harrassed by politicians and bureaucrats armed with good intentions - and the monopoly of force for those who disagree.

antoniocostaamaral 3 years ago

The set of choices is limited. Obama never served this country, he has no idea. McCain can't handle economy...so, it's a simple equation. I want her to win!

Ok that logic right there tells me you SHOULDN'T be allowed into a voting poll if you're not going to judge on candidate on substantial issues (not that they have any).

lawlZ3faireC4PIT4L 3 years ago

So she's a liberal, big surprise there, and she didn't define it correctly.

CandellLife 4 years ago

I only wish that American English hadn't soiled that beautiful word with socialism...

antoniocostaamaral 4 years ago

Rushmore... shut it. Ron Paul is psycho.

My fellow moderates

Just vote for a candidate who won't fuck up. That's OUR motto. LOL, just vote for Obama. Both my parentare Republican while most people at my college are Democrats. Obama is the most balanced between the two. Hillary: two-timing bitch, Ron Paul: WAY too far right-wing, Huckabee: Too Bush-esque, Edwards: Too nervous unclear foreign policy. JUST PICK OBAMA. He'll listen to the people, not some stupid political party. PERIOD

DeadEnd39 4 years ago

Try the political compass, period-head.

antoniocostaamaral 4 years ago

Wow, what a comeback antonio. (said with sarcasm)

However, I WAS going to compliment you on your pointing out that the word "liberal" has a significantly different meaning than what socialists have warped it into. But, Ron Paul and his supporters are WAY too zealous for my tastes. It's scary.

DeadEnd39 4 years ago

You can be as sloppy as you want with your own liberties, responsibilities and rights. Let others defend theirs. "I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"

antoniocostaamaral 4 years ago

You know who lives by that same code? (Almost in the same wording as your statement) Muslim extremists. Now, they believe that their "extremism is a pursuit of liberty from Western tyranny" you know who said those words??? Fuckin' Bin Laden! It takes an intelligent man with a well-centered, non-cavalier approach to foreign policy to lead a nation. Ron Paul is NOT well-centered in that regard. It's guys like him who make other cultures hate us!

DeadEnd39 4 years ago

Please. Yes, let's have someone with a sharp tongue promising 'them' (terrorists + normal people) fire and brimstone, they will kiss us to death! But someone who will let other peoples alone, and concentrate on killing off the real terrorists?? no way! Pffff

antoniocostaamaral 4 years ago

Barack Obama won't let the terrorists alone. but he'll attack them in places they are doing more damage, like Indonesia, Philipines, and Saudi Arabia. Besides, Turkey is mounting their full military to keep Iran in check anyway. Ron is WAY too extreme to run this country, Hillary will run it for her own personal gain. Obama is the only Democrat I've seen with a set of morals to fight for US. I myself, am an independent, but Ron Paul is just too cavalier against the world.

DeadEnd39 4 years ago

DE39, I accept your opinion. I agree that criminals should be prosecuted. But what's happening is occupation of whole foreign nations. No wonder those people rally around their flag and have a strong reason to hate America. You capture no terrorists and end up making them heroes of the land.

antoniocostaamaral 4 years ago