Added: 3 months ago
From: jhabeeb1
Views: 994
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (174)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • so true habeeb,Compubox is overrated its become a joke now.

    We can now Blame HBO for creating this bullshit.

  • Interesting point on the creators part, however judges don't base their decisions on compubox, it's more for the fans at home watching on tv, of course there's a margin of era in compubox but anyone with common sense already knows that so why get upset at it? Judges base the score cards on what they see from up close, compubox gives u a Ruffage of the action on a statistical bases, and that's it, no point in getting upset over nothing......

  • thank you for this video,i been arguing with boat loads of asians about this compubox shit!

    i cant wait till manny retires,the pactard era will be no more!

  • @jimbanzo no I can't wait till manny gets knocked again by whoever his next opponent is.

  • You do have a good point Joe.

  • its actually 4 factors that figure into a round, clean effective punching, effective aggression, defense, and ring generalship. People seem to forget that fact when scoring rounds, if its close with the punches you have to use the other factors to determine a winner. That's what all the marquez supporters seem to forget.

  • @Digs259 what you seem to forget is that everything you named marquez won in.He was the counter puncher.He held ring generalship,he was also the aggressor.I'm going to watch the fight again to make sure.

  • Damn right, you can throw 35 decent shots on an apponent in a round, whilst he throws nothing at all until the last 30 seconds, then he throws one big shot, it lands clean and puts you on your arse for an 8-count off the Ref, and guess what, those fuckin 35 punches mean shit.

    Great video.

  • wow dude you took away one of the few pactard's poor excuses hahaha

  • @slash92gibson yup LOL

  • @jhabeeb1 winner belongs to a fighter with the more active, more aggressive means go forward style and taking the risks. instead of a fighter who backing off style then wait and counters.

  • yeah fhuck compubox and Judges. I say HBO BOXING call up JHABEEB if they really want to know who won the fight. JHABEEB is the GOD OF BOXING. He knows it all!

  • fuck copmubox

  • when are we going to realize that Boxing is but a reflection of our society, our political system? we're too intelligent to be duped like this. and by that I mean to get so engulfed in something so insignificant and obviously fraudulent as Boxing, that we can't see the same tactics used in stealing our money and sovereignty off the tube, i.e. REAL LIFE.

    and I told ya'll a long time ago, not just when it's convenient, that COMPUBOX is complete BULLSHIT!

  • Muhammid Ali wins rounds with out throwing a single punch... stick with the UFC. if you don't get boxing.

  • All over the philippines there are poor kids who are inspired by what pacquiao has accomplished. Many of them find hope in a sport so brutal and so corrupt that it is no longer as popular in america as it was in the past. These kids would one day be fighters. They will participate in this sport and will help keep it alive. Boxing is bred in poverty. Sadly, most of these kids would never come out of it. Success is reserved for the very few. Let us appreciate them all.

  • Great explanation, jhabeeb1. 

  • No need to sound so frustrated about it, man. It's good that you're giving people valuable info. These are new boxing fans who will learn in time.

  • Hey Joe u should make a video about the new excuse these pactards have about Marquez stepping on his foot. Pactards r pathetic.

  • 9-3 Marquez - robbery.

  • There is a way to make compubox work (or at least work better) which is to use the wisdom of crowds. One man pressing a button can make a mistake, but if you have a certain number of trained individuals all judging the fight and you average out the total response then you can improve the accuracy of it.

    It will still be flawed, but the use of judges to determine the outcome of a fight will always be flawed, regardless of what method you use.

  • what does this have to do with boxing or compubox you sound very ignorant. Can you actually debate about boxing or are you concerned with Filipino girls? You are kind of creepy of you ask me. why are you stalking me? how many fights did you actually watch this year or do you only watch Pacquiao? try debating on boxing. I don't know why your so concerned what my fetishes are? that's kind of sick if you ask me

  • Comment removed

  • Word!

  • compubox is flawed

  • tools on how to LEAD a casual boxing fan into believing who won the fight.

    1- HBO bias commentary.

    2- Harold Lederman HORENDOUS scoring of bouts.

    3- Compubox numbers.

  • They got the compubox argument from Skip Bayless.

  • Comment removed

  • 100% agreed, so many people say pac won due to compubox. Well why do we even have judges if compubox is so great?

  • Compubox is the biggest fraud, one of the things fucking up boxing majorly

  • ILL COME UP WITH ANY EXCUSE BECAUSE PACQUIAO IS THE BEST THERE EVER WAS! I AM PACTARDED!

  • comp-u-box has some weight to it, i use it in some arguments/ debates with the box-quaio guys. it's effective when it's used for a round to round basis. but it's more too it than punches thrown and landed, i guy can land 20 pity pat jabs in a round maliginagi style, but if theri opponents lands 5 huge hooks and stubles the guy the edge is in their favor. i use c-box to debate guys who've yet to fight via pbf and pacman. c-box has mayweather persice puncher with manny being sloppy aggressor.

  • 100% agree.

  • Well said jhabeeb. Most Pacquiao fans are casual boxing fans who don't fully understand the sport.

    "Challenger needs to knockout the champion", "Marquez wasn't the aggressor so he loses", "Compare Marquez's face to Pacquiao's", "Look at the CompuBox stats" - How about who won the most f**king rounds!?

  • Remember Hal Lederman said he was scoring based on ring generalship and among other things on who was flashier, that's a whole load of bullshit, how can you score for the fighter that looks better when he throws shots. But in reality Pac didn't even look so good, he was a lost boy. But I guess that explains why Hagler lost to Leonard, H. would land some hard shots and L. would sidestep with his shoeshine and look good without doing much.

  • They have no integrity Joe clearly Pacquiao doesnt neither. Damn punch throwing contest in boxing nowadays.

  • @ReignSupreme287 yep total bullshit bro. what's next headgear? lets just adopt whole amatuer system in the pros if we're gonna go by compubox.

  • @theblitzchannel cool thanks bro

  • Good job mate keep up the videos. I'm a Manny fan but Marquez won 2 out of the 3 fights for me and i'm really having doubts about Manny vs Floyd now i think Floyd has a bit of an easier night than i gave him credit for if Manny fights like Satruday.

  • @theblitzchannel thanks buddy

  • it's not an argument, it's a desperate gasp for air from the pacturds. may they all rot in piss...

  • Completly agree! Compubox is the worst thing that ever happened to boxing!

    Watch devon alexander vs Andriy Kotelnik! Devon throws always more punches

    than his opponents but he doesnt really land them clean! kotelnik scored the cleaner and harder blows on alexander and thats why he should have won!

  • Professional boxing is scored on clean effective punching, ring generalship and aggressiveness. The later two is usually incorrectly omitted by most people when scoring a fight. Which in turn leads to people scoring incorrectly. Case and point the Pacquiao/Marquez fight. People who don't know how to score a fight had Marquez up by 3 to 4 rounds.

  • fuck all the pactard shit...mayweather fuckheads over the last year r the only people i ever hear say shit!! These so called pactards where r there videos?? It was another close fight...boxing is subjective!! Get it through ur fucken heads!! Not everyone is going to agree!!

  • I've been saying the same thing all week. Fights are scored by rounds not punches

  • @marcusarkane and rounds are scored by punches

  • @Lucian86 But clean effective punching is worth more than just light or grazing punches

  • Search for a vide on youtube about compubox, it's very interesting.

    THE 13TH ROUND WITH FREDDYLOKZ - JUAN DIAZ VS PAULIE MALIGNAGGI COMPUBOX BULLSHIT

  • Good vid Joe, I always listen to rope a dope radio and I find myself agreeing with you about things 90% of the time. Some people become too attached to fighters and they are trying to find anyway they can to say Pacquiao won the fight and if you disagree you're a hater.

    Not only is compubox a bad way to determine who won a fight, I think it's incorrect. I've had my suspicions before but during this fight I was like there is no way those numbers are correct.

  • wooo tellin like how it is bro good shit fuckin compubox my ass

  • THE filipino!!! AND PACTARDS ARE RUNNING WILD They coming up with crazy excuses like JMM was stepping on Pacquiao foot when it was a Orthodox vs Southpaw how stupid are they!

  • @DarthMuse yea man.. it's getting LAME!!

  • @divinesense i stayed out of the pacquiao and mayweather debates for so long but i cant sit back any long i love the sport boxing and its gonna continue on the decline as long as this happens...

  • @DarthMuse I feel u man.. trust me.

  • @DarthMuse exactly what pactard just wrote me LOL they must have had a pactard conference to come up with that shit.

  • @DarthMuse lmao, stupid humans.Happens to me every day simply bc im the only southpaw in my whole gym.

  • @DarthMuse exactly watch?v=TkJUaPXs0bE

  • jhabeeb1,you're becoming too violent and emotionally involved with your judgements.The fight was close.Could have gone either way.you overrate Marquez's performance;yes,it was above expectations and Manny's below but the fight was close with many round difficult to score.Marquez had like 2 or 3 very clear rounds for him and that's all.You too aggressive man and everything you said about Pac was very offensive; don't deserve it.Probably you don't care about what I said but I needed to say it

  • This sport is all about passion. You can't always be the nice guy on here. I can't always be subdued all the time when I'm trying to get my point across. I had to listen to people insult me for two years just because I had an opinion now it's my turn to give it right back to them now that I was right. I respectfully disagree with you and I think too many people watch HBO and are influenced by the biased commentary. Close maybe, but IMO very clear cut for Marquez.. Marquez won 116-112 IMO.

  • Pacquiao is the one who is being overated here. He landed glancing blows for most of the fight.

  • You are starting to become a Pacquiao sympathizer. Do you defend Floyd this way when he is being criticized by all the obsessed Pacquiao fans when they call him a coward? Offensive to who? I am only saying that he is very over rated. He should never be mentioned in the same breath as Henry Armstrong. That's blasphemy. Just because I think Floyd is a better fighter how am I insulting Pacquiao? Neither Floyd or Manny is an all time great IMO. There is still much to prove.

  • @jhabeeb1

    I think it's all about how you judge a fight. Personally I watch one thing only: clear, power punches to the head (the body count less). You can't miss a lot, you can be a good slick defense boxer but you have to punch your opponent more than he punches you. From this point of view I didn't see a clear superiority of Marquez in this fight. This is the same scenario when people overrate too much the underdog's perfomance. It happened the same thing in fights like Mayweather vs DLH...

  • Mayweather vs Castillo I, Williams vs Martinez I, Maidana vs Morales, Froch vs Dirrell and so on. The majority of people are calling robberies in these fights. I respect the people's opinion about the winner in these fights but in a sport like boxing where the judgement of a fight is strongly influenced by personal preferences, you cannot call for a robbery when the fight is objectively close.

    I defended Floyd many times; I think he clearly won against DLH, I had a draw against Castillo..

  • I gave him a lot of credit in beating Marquez and I always praised his skills.

    Why I said you insulted Pac ? Taking into account that Mayweather has like one KO in the last 6 years (forget the Ortiz fight), saying that Pac is going to be knocked out by Floyd is an insult in my opinion.

  • that's ridiculous so now your saying Manny can't be knocked out and because I think he can I'm insulting him? boxing fans need to stop getting emotionally attached to fighters. if you told me that you think Manny would knock out Floyd which many people already have I wouldn't take that as an insult. It's just an opinion. You seem to be emotionally attached to this guy for some reason. I could less who wins or losses. I just call it like I see it.

  • *care less

  • at welterweight and above Manny has only 2 knockouts and so does Floyd so why does everyone say Manny is this monstrous puncher and Floyd can't break an egg. I can see Floyd landing a lot of right hands against Pacquiao and swelling up his face real bad especially around the eyes and then possibly either Freddie throws in the towel from the corner or the ref stops it due to cuts and excessive swelling and many people agree with me.

  • @jhabeeb1

    I don't agree. You disrespect Manny's ability to take a punch (especially from not a big puncher like Mayweather), his power and his ability to hurt Mayweather eventually; Floyd will stay away from Manny and not taking to many risks. I can see a wide decision win for Mayweather (like 8-4,9-3) but not a KO. There are very few "ingredients" for that to happen.

  • everyone said Floyd would stay away from Mosley and Ortiz and he went right at both of them and backed them up. all your doing is reciting the same usual bullshit that the media and casual boxing fans say. Pac gets hit way too much Floyd is the most accurate puncher in the sport. that is the ingredients for a TKO in my opinion. You are totally underestimating Floyd's punching power. anyone can be stopped. look at Mosley-Margarito. stop putting these guys on a pedestal. they are human beings.

  • they are not superman. they feel pain just like the rest of them. people really need to just get over their hero worship syndrome and stop falling in love with fighters because they will break your heart every time. just except the fact that Pac just isn't as good as they were hyping him up to be.you don't have to come to his rescue when someone states an opinion on him that is critical. I feel my statements are accurate and you disagree. just say you disagree.

  • don't accuse me of disrespecting a fighter because I don't agree with you. by taking that stance I feel you are disrespecting me. we disagree all the time on the show especially Calix and me but we always respect each other. I you feel I wrong that simply say you disagree. For two years I had to listen to false accusations by obsessed fans. I just didn't expect it from you. frankly I'm a bit disappointed in you. You are being overly critical of me just for having an opinion.Your better thanthat

  • *if

  • @Lucian86, if you were watching an amatuer fight then pacquiao won because he threw more punches but it was a professional boxing match and its have NEVER been about how many punches you throw, but about how many clean, effective punches landed and throwing punches that hit elbows, shoulders, arms dont not count. If you were a real boxing fan you would know that but obviously when pacqiuoa fights, the rules seem to change for observating the basis.Marquez won clearly if you looked at a pro fight

  • @mexrider1

    it's exactly what I score in a fight I don't think Marquez outpunched Pacquiao from this point of view

  • @Lucian86, No its not how you scored the fight cus if you did, you would have seen that pacquiao threw alot of punches that glaced of maquez, arms, elbows, shoulders and bearly touching Marquez with his jab. Marquez was countering him every time he tried to get close with clean, hard, effective punches to the head and body getting pacquiao off balance and fustrating him. How many body punches did pacquiao throw in the fight? I counted about 3 but marquez throw about 25. Pac didnt outpoint him!

  • @mexrider1 I agree 100% but compubox and the judges were counting those shots as landed blows and they weren't even landing. Jim Lampley was screaming every time Pac threw the left and he was hitting air. I just don't get it. What were they watching?

  • @jhabeeb1, I know man, but that what boxing has become when people who should know better start making up punches that clearly dont land. I am just fed up that the sport I love has been hijacked by idiots who have a certain agenda and think they can fool the real boxing fans with bullshit like this! Manny pacquiao is an average/good brawler but not a boxer, never has been and never will be! Doesnt have the technical skills but he is sold to stupid pactards as superman! so I say fuck and block em

  • I had the fight very close, every round was close. I had Pac winning 7 to 5. However, I favor the aggressor in fights, someone that favors a defensive counter puncher would swing all the close rounds to JMM I guess. Also a Floyd fanboy will give every close round to JMM. Pac one a close fight, there was no robbery, time to move on.

  • @hawkermustang It's all about effective aggression. 1. Effective Agression 2. Clean Punching (not how many) 3. defense 4. ring generalship. So if My opponent runs at me and throws six glancing punches and i take a half step back and pivot throwing him off balance and land one or two clean punches to an off balance opponent. I win that exchange in a professional boxing match.

  • @JWCFIGHTFAN That right, JMM's face and the punch stats show that Manny was being somewhat effective. I agree JMM had a few more of the highlight reel punches land, cause Manny was taking more risk coming foward, therefore he ran into some shots. JMM took even more shots, but JMM was taking less risk and backing away most of the fight. Its hard to win even rounds backpeddling and throwing and landing less. JMM did better than most expected, but he didn't clearly win the fight. I could see a draw

  • @hawkermustang did you even watch the video? This isn't a Rocky movie or it isn't supposed to be. I'm going to try and be clear. Defense is a judging criteria, taking a risk and getting punched is the opposite of that. So Pac losses 1. Defense. If JMM had more clean or "highlight" punches as you admit then Pac loses 2. Clean Punching. If the backing up caused Manny to get hit with more "Highlight" punches then he loses 3. Ring Generalship. So that's 3/ 4 Criteria lost by Pacquaio.

  • @JWCFIGHTFAN I watched the fight twice. I had it 115-113 for Manny. Then I scored it again and had it even giving a shit 5th rd to JMM. To be the man you need to beat the man. JMM landed and threw less punches. He took less risk. He lost the fight. JMM supposed clean punching could not muster a knock down, and JMM was more busted up. This was basically an even fight. Close but no cigar.

  • @hawkermustang LoL quoating Ric Flair to prove your point good job. Taking less risk is a good thing not a bad thing. JMM wasn't more busted up but I mean you're quoting Ric Flair so anything goes WHOOO . There are 3 criteria to judge a round risk taking isn't one of them. So using your logic since JMM didn't score a knockdown Pacquaio never beat, Margarito since he didn't know him down right? Pactards this is getting silly.

  • @JWCFIGHTFAN I don't watch or quote wrestlers. Anyway, if Manny was media hyped garbage what where the 50 guys he beat? You Flomos are retarded.

  • @hawkermustang He's not as good as the media hyped him up to be, duh. If anyone doesn't understand how BAD he'll do against a style and fighter like Mayweather, then they need a boxing lesson.

  • @WOTGSmash Do you make money as a fortune teller?

  • @hawkermustang Oh shut up, fool. You seriously think Pacquiao has a chance. You need a boxing lesson.

  • @WOTGSmash And nobody thought JMM had a chance with Manny either. Floyd is a douchebag regardless.

  • @hawkermustang The difference is, people were blinded by Pacquiao's beast performances against tailor-made opponents. Pacquiao sucks against counter-punchers. Mayweather is Marquez times 2 or more. Pacquiao has no chance, why even argue, you can't.

  • @WOTGSmash I wasn't Manny already had two close fights with JMM. I figured if JMM didn't get stopped early it would be another close fight. I still had Manny winning 115-113. JMM's face didn't swell up from allergies either.

  • @hawkermustang I don't care if you weren't or not. You even claimed "...nobody thought JMM had a chance with Manny either."

  • @WOTGSmash Flomos love to give Floyd credit for fights he never fought.

  • @hawkermustang Uhh, what the hell does that have to do with anything here?

  • @WOTGSmash Floyd would beat Manny, Cotto, Margarito, ect. Fact is he hasn't.

  • @hawkermustang Your point?

  • @WOTGSmash Go back to school.

  • @hawkermustang Right, you act like a prick and use an irrelevant argument, because you have no real argument to defend Pacquiao. Keep going pactard.

  • @hawkermustang whos surprised you had pac winning your known as the biggest pactard on youtube.

  • @kidmover That's cool your one of the biggest Flomos on youtube as well. You probably gave every round to JMM 10-8 lol. If Manny ko'd JMM in the 1st rd you would have said JMM was shot and the fight was fixed.

  • the important thing is who set the pattern of the fight (winner) and who was the guy looking for answers? There is no doubt it was Marquez who set and controlled the pattern of the fight and it was Pac who was searching for answers all night long. Pac tried his utmost best to change the style in which the fight was being fought but couldn't. Marquez made Pac fight his fight and was the winner of that contest

  • all they are doing is parroting freddie roach's post fight interview bullshit..

  • yea people on HBO be thinking someone won a round cause they threw more punches

  • good shit.

  • @OutsideTheRopes thanks bro

  • real talk....i am going to refer all pactards to this vid for a nice lesson

  • @BloodBoxing thanks bro

  • Great breakdown....some people just dont get it...

  • @cristobal9677 thanks

  • stop being cry baby bitch,Pacquiao cleanly won the fight

    he landed fucking 50 more punches

    its funny how you hater spam all the time compubox of first 2 fights cuz marquez landed like 10 more punches and now all the sudden compubox is bullshit,bunch of retarded hypocrites you are.

  • @serpakovski go tell em man!!! Skip Bayless is a Genius.. we all know that!! these guys trying to put the man down

  • @serpakovski Are you still coming back for more? Didn't I just school you in my last vid? Keep it up and I'm gonna have to make you the president of my fan club. LOL

  • @celsmag I am asshole fuck off

  • Marquez punches were Sooo Effective that he had to headbutt Pac to create a cut on his eye.. Sooo effective...Stop it man!!! Marquez LOST AGAIN!!!! nothing you can do about it.. he had his chance 3 times already.. all he could come up was a DRAW!

  • Flip flopper? I've been saying the same thing for 2 years when you weren't even around. Pac kept reaching and leaning in that's why the head butt occured. Southpaws and orthodox fighters always clash heads. Pac was also bleeding out of his mouth and Marquez even staggered him a few times. I actually scored the first 2 fights for Pac but he clearly lost this time. This is the worst he's ever looked in my opinion. If he fights Floyd it's a total mismatch. I'd put my house on it.

  • @jhabeeb1 blah blah.. now we back to A ... instead of ya'll bashing on Manny atleast giving fans good fight, all you do is diss the man, for what he's trying to give to the fans.. and praising a man who clearly ducked a lot of fighters in his time... I see a Marquez victory too, and I also see a Pac victory.. Kudos to both men.. like I said Marquez only could come up was a DRAW in my scorecard, and thats great with all the disadvantages! and all you do is praise Floyd??

  • hey flomo! first off fix your teeth.. next. you wanna talk about effective punching, Marquez face was all busted up, you dumbass! ya'll flomos saying floyd was the most accurate puncher in the sport according to compubox but when it comes to pac its garbage.. youre just a cheap wannabe expert in youtube, your opinion doesnt count.. judges do!! go do me a favor and fix your god damn teeth.. LMAO

  • @Dredgification @jhabeeb is not necessarily discarding compubox per say. He saying that because a fighter throws & lands more punches doesn't mean he won the fight. Its about how many rounds you win. Manny might have landed more, but really he lost all but 3 rounds. Landing more punches in those 3 rounds doesn't win him the fight, I'm sorry but Manny lost! And Floyd might have high stats in compubox, but he wins most of the rounds, if not all in a fight ALSO. Winning rounds is very important!

  • @Dredgification your girl had no problem with my teeth last night when she was ridin my dick. you're just a fuckin Pactard who just listens to Bob Arum and the rest of the bullshit HBO proganda. Face it dickhead your hero lost you fuckin retard.

  • @jhabeeb1 according to Pac's haters he lost.. sad to say Marquez best performance would still create controversy over Pacs Worst Performance.. Pac didnt lose to nobody Flomo... fucking pathetic ttoothless wannabe expert.. go cry a river coz Marquez AGAIN lost in the eyes of the Officials not in the eyes of nuthuggers like yourself.. lmao

  • Toothless wonder? I have all my teeth you fuckin ugly troll. Even the Filiinos know Pac lost and Pac himself knows he lost that's why he wants a fourth fight now. I can't believe you Pactards are still talking after Saturday. Pac looked like shit. Stop being a dickrider and hero worshiper. The Myth is over you pathetic loser and oh yeah tell your girl I said hi.

  • @jhabeeb1 now you using Filipinos as an argument?? lol.. I thought Fililipinos dont know shit about boxing? only Pac.. why is that youre riding with their opinions now... smh.. youre a flip flopper

  • @Dredgification: er...according to just about everyone in the boxing universe Pac lost and was given a "board decision"

  • @jhabeeb1 Well Arum said this was a tough fight for Manny did he? and oh ya'll should be thanking bob coz if it wasnt for him your GOD wont be undefeated still... ya'll flomos riding on Floyds dick saying this would be a demolition... stop flip flopping you fucking wannabes..

  • The whole world now knows Pac was a media hype job. Your just a mindless sheep who fell in love with one fighter and just can't face the fact that he was over rated. Just take a look at every poll, read what all the boxing writers have wrote, and check the press row scoring and you see that only a few stupid dopes like yourself thought Pac won. Your a joke son.

  • @jhabeeb1 The whole world?? hahaha.. are u stupid or sumthing? There are lots of Pac haters, I agree.. but the whole world?? Oh wow.. speaking of exaggerating shit.. and its seems to me youre just jumping on the bandwagon talking aboout that bullshit poll whatever that is..Most of ya'll trolls expecting a demolition on Marquez when we Pac fans expected a tough fight.. all of a sudden ya'll the gifted ones who "know" boxing.. gtfoh son.. youre a joke, just a youtuber boxing "expert" ..

  • @Dredgification there are lots of Floyd haters too. And yes the whole world except Pactards like you who follow one fighter and just started watching boxing a year ago. You are the one calling me an expert I never saids that you did. thanks for the compliment. I am a person just like you with an opinion and just because you disagree with it you decided to come on here and talk shit and I keep exposing you. By the way where are your videos? LOLLLLLLLLLL

  • @jhabeeb1 seriously can you call the boxing greats Pactards, when I paste the links where they say Pac is great? are they Pactards? you aint a kid no more man.. we all know there are lots of trainers and boxing greats consider this man as great.. Pactards??? Floyd is skillful but he is a PUSSY!!!

  • Truthfully I like Manny and yes he fought very hard and yes it was very a good fight and I really enjoyed it. It's nothing personal against him I just feel Floyd is much more skilled than him which doesn't mean that I think Manny is a bad fighter I just feel that he is overated a bit. He is not an all time great in my opinion nor is Floyd. My favorite fighter is Sugar Ray Leonard. I just think compubox is bullshit and a very weak argument here. That was my point. Why did it upset you so much?

  • @jhabeeb1 I used to have a decent boxing conversation about boxing, what pisses me off is people automatically label me Pactard because I am a Pac fan..nothing personal on Floyd either.. believe me, I am one of the very few "Pactard" who is predicting a Floyd Victory over Manny.. just want to happen it NOW...there was a tweet from Boricuaboxing Boxing Gods would never let Floyd and Manny lose till they fight each other.. I kinda agree with that.. Have a Nice Day man..

  • @jhabeeb1 btw ur what is Boxing vid is a topnotch

  • @Dredgification thank you

  • @jhabeeb1 again your opinion doesnt count, judges do.. youre just a pac hater and a floyd lover.. simple as that.. now go watch floyd highlights on youtube to make yourself happy, now that AGAIN Marquez lost to the Greatest Fighter of All Time MANNY PACQUIAO... LMAO

  • @Dredgification and your just a Floyd hater and a Pac lover and my opinion counts to me. Who really gives a fuck what the judges say? The judges also said Paul Williams beat Erislandy Lara and Whitiker Chavez was a draw. Which everyone knows was bullshit. You don't know how to score a fight yourself and have your own opinion? You just go with whatever the judges say even if you think they are wrong? Are you really that naive?

  • @jhabeeb1 and now here you are dissing compubox, coz from the three fights Pac was the one ahead.. I didnt see you posting this kind of shit after the 1st and 2nd fight... or Floyd vs Castillo fight.. only at Pac's eh???

  • I never liked compubox and for the record I had Floyd losing the first Castillo fight. I never rely on compubox as tool to score fights. I'm 42 years old now and I've been watching the sport since I was 9 thats 33 years. When I first started watching fights they never even had compubox. I don't believe that it's relavent

  • @jhabeeb1 beeb they're IDIOTS!!! now they're using the argument of who's face looked the worst to judge a fight. again if we judge a fight based on that, then we should just wait to the end of the fight and look at the fighters faces to see who won. that would mean that prescott although he outlanded, got KOed, and faced looked better than alvarado, that he should have won the fight??? u made ur point clearly but the will NEVER EVER understand simple logic... one love bro

  • @TM789SP2 thanks bro I appreciate it.

  • @jhabeeb1 before you call someone a retard look at your face in 0:00 the thumbnail of the video that might be the first ever retard caught in cam. you look like a yabadaba btw fred its been a long time. anyway first watch the video again if you want get someone who really knows how to judge the fight. everyone are very welcome to review the fight. pac outworked marquez from 7-12 after the old man says to marquez that he is winning. you are free to bitch,wine and moan like a baby in youtube thou

  • @sawakadin where is your video you fuckin asswhole and I will call anyone I want a retard if i see fit you fuckin Pactard . and oh yeah your a retard. you're a racist pussy mutherfuckin bitch. you faceless coward.

  • @jhabeeb1 why in america people always talking about racism i don't give a fuck about your color you god forsaken yabadaba asshole. im not being racist here its just so happen you look like fred is it because your color? you got a fuck up logic you muscle head asshole. if you don't want me to commenting at your face then freaking stop recording closing up your face. anyway if compubox is bullshit then find someone else to score the fight. or you rewatch the fight. educate yourself fred

  • @sawakadin you corny motherfucker you sound so stupid compubox doesn't score the fight judges do you stupid fuckin retard. what do my muscles have to do what compubox you pencil neck geek? educate yourself Wilma and do research before you decide to become a keyboard warrior and type bullshit you fuckin Pactard and yes you are a racist you don't like anything that's not Filipino.

  • @jhabeeb1 lol that was fuckn hilarious im not even a filipino. i didn't need to be a filipino to be a fan of pacquiao you moron you got a fucked up brain you yabadaba bitch so are you saying only filipino will gonna like pac? and only filipino can appreciate his boxing style in the ring? i might be sound corny but i don't know why you are very angry. im just saying what i see you look fred and you look like a retard in 0:00. lol i just saw your face again. ah that made my day fred :)

  • Are you back again Willma? LOL Cute little kitten you got for your icon pussy. Why don't you show your face coward. Your girl loves how my face looks you stupid little fuck she tells me every night. you love it too cause you keep checkin me out and you keep coming back you little bitch. when are you gonna have the balls to do a vid? Your just a fuckin keyboard warrior with no balls. Stop lying you're Filipino LOL

  • @jhabeeb1 you say im corny but why copying my cursing? that was retard just like the man in 0:00 you are the one whos being a racist here trying to say that all of the fans of pac are filipinos. you keep on saying filipino do you have that kind of fetish for them? you sick freak? if im a filipino i will be damn proud that i am. and being who you are and what you do doesn't matter on what we are talking. so YOU are the one whos being racist here FRED. btw nice teeth same size of my thumb nail

  • no you are racist because you only appreciate Manny because he is from the same country as you and you give no credit to other fighters. the only retard is you because you know nothing about the sport and you are obbsessed and you worship one fighter who you believe is god. you have a fetish because you keep coming back and you keep checking me out. sorry dude I got a girl and I don't swing that way. make a response vid show your face coward. by the way cute kitty AHAHAHA

  • @jhabeeb1 really? so that's the meaning of racist in your dictionary huh? please don't make a copy of it might be the cause of the end of the world XD i'm a boxing fan and it so happen manny is one of them. and when did i say i don't like jmm? did i just pacquiao vs marquez III is a great fight? might be fight of the year without all of you sore losers keeps on bitching about the result. jmm bring his a game in that ring his counter punching is superb that made pac seal his offence

  • dude face facts Compubox sucks. I enjoyed the fight too so what's your point?

  • @jhabeeb1 and you want to see badly my picture and video huh? damn i didn't you are really that had fetishes. thats why you keep on insisting i'm a filipino because you have that kind of fetish for them. sorry to disappoint you fred but im not one of those guys that you are crazy for. im just a guy that got entertain by the fight and i see no reason to be so angry about anything in the fight. because at the end of the day pac's fights are 100 times better than floyds fights. calm down FRED

  • Explain to me in a response vid Wilma why I am wrong. I enjoy both Floyd and Manny's fights. Floyd is just better in my opinion. You can't explain to me why you think Pac won and all you can do is point to the compubox. It just shows your lack of knowledge of the sport. Make a vid and debate me or call me up and debate and I'll record the conversation and let the people judge. So far 70 agree with me and only you and 4 others disagree. Prove me wrong. OK Wilma LOL

  • @jhabeeb1 ok ill explain how pacquiao won. 1 pac is the champion marquez is the challenger yes marquez had a lots of moments in the fight than pacquiao from round 1-7 but marquez didn't out hassled pacquiao. pacqiiao throws alot of punch every round and marquez only lands 12 - 15 punches because he is just counter punching and throw 3 punch combination every two rounds. and at 7 round when the old man says you are winning the fight. he marquez decided to settles for a decision.

  • well if that's what you believe that's what you believe. I disagree. I don't believe just because someone is the champion he should get the benefit of the doubt in the close rounds. to me it appeared as though Pac was reaching in with a lot of his shots and not reaally landing flush while I felt marquez created space by sliding back luring Pac in and i felt Pac walked into many flush shots by Juan. I just saw it different .my point is compubox is flawed and is a poor exampleof puncheffectiveness

  • @jhabeeb1 there is a reason why there is a challenger and there is a champion do you agree with that? as a challenger you got to prove that you are the one who supposed to be wearing that belt.you will take it from the champion. judges didn't saw it on marquez because all troughout the fight he is on a defence and its so happen that marquez can turn his def to off. marquez settles for the judges decision and judges won't take a belt from a champ. the challenger should be the one doing that

  • @sawakadin Your argument about challenger vs champion is terrible and means nothing in boxing. For the record, in their second fight Marquez was the champion with his belt on the line, and not only did he win the fight to most observers, he landed much more punches according to "compubox." Please go ahead and respond, make something up so I can laugh.

  • @WOTGSmash first make any sense before commenting back at me. if my arguement of challenger vs champion is terrible then give something better than mine. there is nothing wrong with that believe a most of the judges judge by that way. the 2nd fight jmm kissed the canvas so pac had an ace. and its great damn fight too. i didn't see marquez dominates pac that night. and they are both had the belt in that fight. your arguement is stupid. don't compare a fight to another because they are diffrent 

  • @sawakadin No stupid, there is nothing in the rules of judging that has anything to do with challenger vs champion. That's just some dimwitted excuse pactards are making up. My example is pactard logic. If I were to use Pactard logic, than Marquez definitely should of won the second fight, because he was the champion with HIS belt on the line. He landed more punches. So Pacquiao knocked him down once, but he didn't knock him out, wasn't enough for the challenger to conquer the champion.

  • @jhabeeb1 after 7 marquez decides for a 12 round decision watch it again. marquez is different from 1-6 and 7-12. at 7-12 he breaths hard every after round. and the old man keeps on saying you are winning the fight. and from 7-12 pac started to land the the right hook from marquez left face. made his face left turn red. and pac started to land the one two combination of his that vertical right job and left hook. but from 7-12 marquez is still counter punching well but he completly rly on it