For those who say "building 7 was structurally weak, and was about to collapse anyways- so BBC was reporting on it"...how the hell would anyone know that it was "about to collapse"? There was very little structural damage, and some random office fires...and if so, how did BBC obtain that information so fast? That it was weak, and about to collapse? And why was her live feed cut RIGHT after she reported it collapsing? Was that a coincidence too? True conspiracy theorists believe that crap...
Pull it don't mean to get firefighters out. Specific term used in real.estate biz, to pull a bldg means to demolish it via controlled demolition. It don't mean pull firefighters cuz none were in there. Bldg unstable, evacuated b 4 noon. U. R reaching! Gal from BBC,love 1st day truth 'financial district'-looks like the aftermath of an atomic bomb++ covered with white dust. Mayor Guiliani says its not gonna get him down,its business as usual. City is locked down,cant go home! Luv it! Terror mayor
if that was the case then why is larry on record saying he told the firefighters to "pull it" so pull it meant to get the firefighters out then if your last post is true the fire fighters had to be told by the building owner to get out as the collapse was going to happen. but of course they were out by11am and NIST final report shows freefall for 2.5 seconds so looks like your speculations dont hold up to testimony or obsevation
@SpecialFXAnimation No one claims the reporter predicted the future. The firefighters said that WTC 7 was unstable and likely to collapse. The collapse was widely expected.
@buddyfreakinhoIIy No, the firefighters were parroting information fed to them. They were as confused as everyone else that day. The fact that the firefighters said the building was about to collapse is actually evidence that it was intentionally demolished. Question: why would the destruction of a building with light damage and a few fires (all the photographic evidence supports this) fall into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds? You 're suffering from serious denial.
• The shaking resulted from the use of a directed kinetic scalar weapon focused on building 7 using HAARP ELF (Extra Low Frequency) broadcasting. That would have weakened the structure significantly before they "pulled" the building with a small amount of sequentially detonated explosive charges. Building 7 was destroyed last because it was the command center for the 911 psyops.
@guidonyk So what if there is? that is not evil. If anything! a world government that can agree and work together with every country in the world is good!
@23Blacklight fuck no...u wanna be turned into a communist world??...cuz thats what a world wide government would do...turn the whole world into communist..and make everyone "equal" ...but not equal...there would be no room for advancement...censorship of ridiculous things...they would eliminate free speech...some dude in china wrote like 4 blogs and got 9 years in prison because he criticized the government..do u want that???
@guidonyk And what is wrong with communism? (i don't actually what that in the world) you used an example of a bad communist country. Libya went to shit and that is capitalist? it doesn't matter what system of money a country uses. the problem at the end of the day is us. Our humanity doesn't allow us to move forward without leaving others behind. (Communism doesn't mean censorship and being trapped...no country has done it right yet).
@23Blacklight ahhh i agree with your point with humanity and thats exactly where im going with this...communism doesnt mean censorship??but show me a good example of communism being used right and that argument shall be closed...
@23Blacklight .but as far a world wide government..how bout the U.S. congress recently passing the NDAA(national defense authorization act)which allows the government to detain any citizen without cause or trail for as long as they want...what makes you think legislation like this wouldnt be passed in a worldwide government??
@guidonyk Well that is the problem. Communism is a perfect 'theory' thats all. The reason it cannot work is because we are an imperfect race. (sad face).
And a world wide government would be hard...i doubt it would work either. But again. What is wrong? The theory, or us?
@22doodster87 When i say 'us' I mean the human race. We together are just pathetic. We are all evil in some way. Even if we sometimes do good things at the end of the day everything would be better with just less of us.
@23Blacklight I agree with you somewhat. This is why we need to end welfare. Why steal from people and let corrupt bureaucracies decide how to distribute the money, esp whena lot of the income tax go to pay the interest payments of government debt. If I want to help a good person in need I will, but I would refuse to help a freeloader, and then there are people that just cant be helped. You can lead a horse to water but you cant make it drink.
@snakeskin2u2 Hey Snake, when are you going to explain your accusation that FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro had "foreknowledge" of 7's demolition, implying he was in on the inside job? Why are you claiming the firefighters are murderers?
BTW Snake I'm STILL waiting for you to explain your accusation that FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro had "foreknowledge" of 7's demolition, implying he was in on the inside job.
@snakeskin2u2 "broadcast an unexpected disaster plus the reasons for it one hour too soon"
Wrong again! Actually, the collapse of 7 WAS expected, and the reasons were given by the firefighters who were on the scene. That is, after all, WHY they evacuated before it came down - or can't you figure that out?
The fact that NONE of the other stories or bulletins carried on BBC that day were mistimed proves you're a joke. How could they have been on-time for everything all day, then suddenly an hour early for this one story, then back on time again? Please explain how THAT works.
and by the way this was broadcasted before the collapse, and BBC just happened to predict the collapse 20 min ahead of time and its exact results... that's whats really in question here.
@snakeskin2u2 "The script was timed prior to BST = prior to March 2001"
If that were true, then they must have announced the plane crashes an hour too early as well - right? And each towers' collapse - right? And everything else that happened - right?
@snakeskin2u2 Sooooooooooooo ... the "perps" drip-fed everyone EXCEPT the BBC correctly all day ... and drip-fed the BBC correctly all day UNTIL, suddenly, they were an hour early w/bld 7?
I saw this on TV when it happened. If that had been a screen clip behind her, then why wasn't this coverage repeated many times? Instead, it was yanked. 9-11 was an inside job to be certain the public wouldn't protest the Patriot Act, which has crippled our freedoms. In another 10 years our Constitution will be a frail shell of itself. How sad.
The BBC press released at Manhattan ( + 5 hours) when they should have released at Manhattan( + 5 +1 daylight savings time = + 6).
The script was therefore laid down prior to the day and coming from a 3rd party.
That it was pre-scripted prior to the day with full intricate details of the "collapse" of the twin towers indicates that the whole scenario on 9/11 was pre-scripted = finely timed controlled demolitions.
This seemed very damning to me for a couple seconds. Then I considered it for those seconds and came the the following conclusion: The reporter is in front of a green screen showing the NY skyline and the video being played is of the skyline ~20 minutes earlier. Isn't the most reasonable explanation for this? Let me emphasis I am not an expert, nor have I drawn any final conclusions on any 9/11 conspiracy theories. But this video is far from conclusive to me. Your thoughts would be appreciated.
You are entirely wrong firstly for the simple reason that you started your calculations with the presumption that there must be a reasonable explanation for what you see and hear.
Firstly, there is NOT, The script is not only faked and showing an impossible scenario, but is also broadcast one hour too soon.
Secondly, you can only assume that Jane is standing in front of a "green screen" because you cannot see how she could be so clairvoyant. She is NOT (on both counts).
@snakeskin2u2 this was broadcasted before the collapse, and BBC just happened to predict the collapse 20 min ahead of time and its exact results... that's whats really in question here.
@snakeskin2u2 How are you so sure she is not in front of a green screen? I am not saying she is or isn't. I am just presenting this as a very likely and simple explanation.
@snakeskin2u2 Hey, Snake, when are you going to explain what you meant when you said FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro "knew personally that building 7 was rigged to come down at a certain time." Yes or no - was he in on the inside job?
@TheJackLasley this was broadcasted before the collapse, and BBC just happened to predict the collapse 20 min ahead of time and its exact results... that's whats really in question here.
You just said that they prescript and then that its ridiculous to say that they pre script. How can they anticipate that the building would actually fall down when its never happened before?You don't have to answer that. The most unbelievable thing in the world is that that building would collapse in freefall just from fire and some falling debris.
@LKaramazov "How can they anticipate that the building would actually fall down when its never happened before?"
Because they have EYES, EXPERIENCE, TRAINING and BRAINS. They SAW the building had major fire and damage, they KNEW they were unable to fight the fires (no water), they OBSERVED the building leaning & creaking.
Would YOU have gone into that building assuming you'd be safe because it's "never happened before"?
Once again you failed to answer the question. Why did the BBC report something that didn't happen, and discussed it at length. Have an open mind. The architects and engineers for 9-11 have the guts to say what the others won;t say from fear of reprisal.
@LKaramazov When news organizations anticipate an event - say, a celebrity is on his death bed, or the fire department has announced that a burning building cannot be saved and is expected to collapse - they don't wait until that event happens to write the press release, they prepare it IN ADVANCE.
I don't know how, exactly, the release ended up in that BBC anchor's hands prematurely - but it's certainly plausible, a HELL of a lot more so than the ridiculous everything-was-prescripted fantasy.
Oh, and one more thing: "Discussed it at length"? Hardly! That's just typical truther embellishment.
The London anchor brings it up offering NO details whatsoever, then asks the reporter in NY - who clearly has no idea what he's talking about & moves on to another subject.
Incredible how all of you deniers can see in this video plain evidence that the media is lying, but you ignore the issue.You just refuse to break your conditioning.
They cocked up. I think they were trying to make out it was live, when it wasn't. It was a repeat, a pre-recording or she wasn't in New York but a small studio in London.
Seriously, how lame do you have to be to believe the "perps" would bother to pre-script everything??? What would be the point? Why not just blow the buildings & let the media report it as it happened? Why add HUNDREDS of conspirators to the payroll? WAY too risky to involve that many people.
@LKaramazov "YOu simply think that "they" wouldn't do what YOU wouldn't do."
Oh, it's not that. It's just that your explanation is so ridiculously implausible. WHY would they go to so much trouble & take so much risk that's so utterly unnecessary?
They press released at Manhattan ( + 5 hours) when they should have released at Manhattan( + 5 +1 daylight savings time = + 6).
The script was therefore laid down prior to the day for such an error to occur.
That it was pre-scripted prior to the day with full intricate details of the "collapse" of the twin towers indicates that the whole scenario on 9/11 was pre-scripted = finely timed controlled demolitions.
@snakeskin2u2 So wait - you're saying the BBC's error was one of daylight savings time, that their announcement of 7's collapse was made an hour too early?
But the announcement WASN'T an hour early, it was only 20 minutes early! So how do you figure? Were they supposed to be 40 minutes *late*? Please explain.
@snakeskin2u2 "A press release of 30 to 40' after an event is quite normal."
Is it? Since when? Is that YOUR observation, or is there a source for that figure? Do they that teach that in journalism school?
What IS quite normal is to prepare a release for an anticipated event - like the collapse of a building they've been TOLD is expected to collapse - IN ADVANCE.
So in the world of possibilities, isn't ONE of them that someone at the BBC gave that pre-prepared release to the anchor too early?
@snakeskin2u2 "That ["some short time ago"] is generally meaning with newsflashes within the past hour.= 30 to 40 minutes average"
Says you. "some short time ago" really means WHATEVER the readers wants it to mean. Your 30-40' is totally made up, of course.
"The release was one hour prior to the blamket release to all other stations"
BULL. You have YET to prove there was any "blamket" release at all! Can you provide clips of all the other stations reading this statement AT THE SAME TIME?
That 9/11 was a scam is proven throught ALL fields of reserach.
This video is not only evidential confirmation-through the witness of a live camera -for all of those conclusions, but is also in it's own right confrmation that 9/11 was pre-scripted, timed , controlled demolitions veiled as "terrorist attacks".
It is now time for action to be taken, and too late for arguments.
Your failed attempts to block or blacken this evidence has long ago failed.
@snakeskin2u2 Yet another laughable lie courtesy of SnakeSkin!
"That 9/11 was a scam is proven throught ALL fields of reserach."
ALL fields? Hardly! Neither mainstream physics NOR mainstream civil engineering have accepted this 9/11 "scam." If you have any doubts, google "ASCE world trade center" and you'll find numerous papers by the nation's leading structural engineers - ALL of which point to plane-crash damage & fires as the cause; NONE indicate controlled demolition.
@snakeskin2u2 Great non-response, my friend! Way to live up to the low standards you truthers have set for yourselves!
BTW we're STILL waiting for you to explain your implication that FDNY Chief Nigro was in on the inside job when you made this statement: "If anyone stated the building was likely to collapse" - as Chief Nigro did - "then he knew personally that is was rigged to come down at a certain time."
@snakeskin2u2 "It was meant to be 40 minutes AFTER the event."
Of course you can PROVE this? Can you provide evidence that all the OTHER media read the same release exactly 40' AFTER the collapse?
You are lying, of course - AGAIN. The anchor isn't reading any press release AT ALL in this video! Watch it again; he remarks on the collapse in matter-of-fact terms, then asks the correspondent in New York (who BTW clearly has no idea what he's talking about). No press release.
@snakeskin2u2 Hey, Snake, I'm STILL waiting for you to explain what you meant when you said FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro "knew personally that [building 7] was rigged to come down at a certain time." How can you accuse the CHIEF of the fire department of being part of the conspiracy - especially since they lost so many of men that day? Stop cowering & explain yourself!
This video on it's own merit, without referring to any other evidence proving controlled demolition ( which in actual fact is confirmed through all fields of research) quite simply shows that the whole of 9/11 was pre-scripted = controlled.
The BBC did not know my friend. They would not have released such damning evidence through a live transmission if they had. They withdrew the programme from available download (highly unusual)within a few hours, but copies had already been taken.
There is a whole multitude of evidence that proves 9/11 was pre-scripted/controlled, however it is not necessary to refer to any of it as this video alone does all of that.
LOL. I love that one. What you call 'research' is in reality the practice of internalizing a lot of debunked lies. It's going to take you years to unlearn all of that crap disguised as knowledge.
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."
@snakeskin2u2 Everyone who was paying attention that day knew that building 7 was going to collapse. It's why the firefighters were ordered to evacuate hours before. As part of your 'research', you should include the testimonies of the firefighters who WERE ACTUALLY THERE
h t t p : / / sites . google . c o m /site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofthewithdrawalfromwtc
@snakeskin2u2 Here's just one example: "It could have been an hour, hour and a half we were doing that before we were ordered to move away from that part of Tower No. 1 because there was an imminent danger of collapse of World Trade Center No. 5 and 7." –Firefighter Vandon Williams
@snakeskin2u2 "The collapse had damaged 7 World Trade Center ... It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we wouldn't lose any more people." - FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro
NOW - where does Chief Nigro mention controlled demolition?
You cannot argue third hand hearsay against the hard evidence of a live camera which confirms controlled demolition, and also backs up all fields of research on the subject. If anyone stated the building was likely to collapse, then he knew personally that is was rigged to come down at a certain time.
Those are the facts = controlled.
The live transmission from the BBC is the icing on the cake confirmation/witness of controlled demolition.
@snakeskin2u2 "If anyone stated the building was likely to collapse, then he knew personally that is was rigged to come down at a certain time."
WAIT - so you are saying that Daniel Nigro, CHIEF of the Fire Department of New York, had PRIOR KNOWLEDGE that building 7 was "rigged" for demolition? Is THAT what you're saying? That the chief of the FDNY was in on it???
@snakeskin2u2 You need to admit to yourself that everything you think you know about structural engineering or demolition was learned on a conspiracy site. It is a fact that a steel structure, if left to burn uncontrolled indefinitely, will eventually collapse. The firefighters decided to abandon the effort to stop building 7 from burning. They knew that that meant it was going to eventually collapse. It surprised no one who was paying attention. i was paying attention that day. Were you?
Show this video to a person, I mean sheeple sherson sheep dumb ass ignorant retard that still thinks 911 attacks was from another country. Show this video to one of them & they will still not believe. They will still be in denial.
Simple deduction of facts given in this video alone prove that not only WTC7, but the whole of the 9/11 scenarion was pre-scripted = timed = controlled.
The script was written prior to the day - pre-written, resulting in press release time error Manhattan / London. The amount of detail indicates long before.
The script concerning the "collapse" of building 7 relies totally on the "official reasons" for the collapse of the twin towers indicating that all 3 "collapses" were pre-timed / pre-scripted / pre-planned.
== conclusion controlled demolition in all three cases.
PARANOID.. Read Bin Laden statements. Al Queda & Iraqi Baath were at odds. There was no involvement to find with the US, only with the anti Soviet ISI . Bin Laden, superstitious salafi Muslim, with the raving religiosity of an Abraham or Moses. Your US Govt was inept and bumbling, not clever. As for anyone believing Saddam had WMDs, a conspiracy would have found planted WMD's, not be empty handed. Conspiracy for what? Oil supply given back, the US will leave Iraq & Afghanistan at huge cost.
No plane struck building seven. It had fires burning on a few floors that it was designed to easily withstand. One of the leading demolition experts in Europe took one look at the footage and said it was without question a controlled demolition. 1200 architectural specialists have risked their reputation to campaign for the truth on this specific issue. Building seven is the smoking gun. they did this right out in the open and the people believed whatever they were told.
The 1st report of an inside job came from a HAMAS propaganda newspaper. Ramzi Yusuf planned 911 with OBL $. Terror continues while Israel builds on land or holds land taken from neighbors Syria, Lebanon, Jordan & Egypt (& the Palestinians). Secrets always leak and a 911 inside job does not stand up to scrutiny. Who killed Kennedy? Lincoln? Lady Diana? who plotted Roswell & Pearl Harbour? Zionist & NWO conspirators? The USA couldn't even keep the A Bomb secret, Govts change, people always talk.
@nzobriens they haven't kept it a secret, people come forward with more and more evidence all the time, you just hand wave it because you already decided to believe whatever fox news tells you to.
@cyberpsygen7 I read about the Bojinka plot BEFORE 911 and we don't get Fox News on New Zealand TV, (no loss from what I hear. Do you also think the Moon landing was a hoax, Father Christmas really does live at the North Pole and your mum didn't do it with your dad. Grow up, Governments include advisors who lose their jobs every few years, they blab. So called elite soldiers write memoirs and people like to talk. Of your best friends, how many of those ladyboys can keep a secret? People talk.
@nzobriens good try pretending im crazy for trusting the same government that intentionally lied about WMD and Al Queda connection to start a war with Iraq. you just blew your own credibility.
at least 5 wargames were being run on 9/11 that confused the authorities and moved interceptors out of the areas. shouldn't the official investigation have found the leaks that couldn't keep those secret from the terrorists and the exact nature of their involvement with them?
@WONDOCTORJ thats because there is no debate to be made on the other side. ItWasTyped deals with logic and evidence, for which there is plenty to support the official story and NONE to support this dumbass inside job crap. dont you get it? all you conspiracy theorists are wasting your lives worrying about some fantasy BS
ItWasTyped. com... there's plenty more posts like the one u mentioned explaining everything logically. Admit it, you have no response to the argument on that site
@culturebully3 UUUhhhmmmmm......I don't know if it was an inside job or not for sure. I do know that I studied more EVIDENCE then most, and I lean towards the inside job side.
People like you believe anything the government tells you.
Kinda like how undercover cops were at the front line of the occupy wall street march on the brooklin bridge posing has protesters, later seen in their cop uniforms.
Your government loves you, don't worry, go back to sleep.
@WONDOCTORJ once again, you are wrong my son. i dont deny for a second that the government/media lie to us, to an extent. however it takes a rational, intelligent person to separate the lies from the facts, and to find GOOD evidence of what we believe. you have NO EVIDENCE of any of this inside job crap, u believe it to feel better about yourself and so that u can have someone to blame the worlds problems on. wake up little boy, have a read at ItWasTyped. com and you may escape from la la land x
@WONDOCTORJ because you dont show any, all you do is talk the usual conspiracy theorist "open your eyes" "youre so brainwashed" "go back to sleep" bullshit without any evidence to back up your claims. you never have any because it doesnt exist! idiot!
ItWasTyped. com .. intelligent, rational people welcome
Green screen or not, I guess nobody bothered to realize 5:07 PM EST was 14 minutes before 7 collapsed into it's footprint with no resistance throughout the entire structure AKA free fall.
gulf of tonkin people...council on foreign relations member gary hart wrote a letter to iran saying that gulf of tonkin and uus maine were false flags, that america has a history and will use that again if needed against iran...
@MrCrazyb23 this video is about wtc 7. shrilly chanting "gulf of tonkin" in response to the disparate details of 9/11 amounts to nothing more than pure laziness.
The script was written prior to the day - pre-written, resulting in press release time error Manhattan / London. The amount of detail contained in the script would indicate a long long time beforehand, possibly years. (pre-planned).
The script concerning the "collapse" of building 7 relies totally on the "official reasons" for the collapse of the twin towers indicating that all 3 "collapses" were pre-timed / pre-scripted / pre-planned.
== conclusion controlled demolition in all three cases.
Yeah, there is the building 7 right behind her, notice how it is "engulfed" in flames, with smoke coming from it. All pictures ever taken of building 7 show such inconsequential fires on various floors it's not even funny. Almost no fires at all as a matter of fact. You can't even see any damage.
If anyone would like to stop spouting your lying government/media propaganda BS and show a picture of something different, go ahead. But you can't, because you are liars who protect liars.
@MsMaggieOC Actually, almost all pictures show a crazy amount of fire and smoke, and the building being engulfed in flames. Either you chose to ignore the evidence that 911 was NOT an inside job, or you are blind/ retarded.....Take your pick?
Late on 6-10, US & British Special Forces launched a daring night time raid on a house in the besieged Libyian town of Sirte, after recieving word that the ousted dictator Colonel Muammar Gaddafi was hiding there
Plans to capture him quickly went wrong as mercenaries opened fire. In a brief firefight, it was clear that Gaddafi & 1 of his sons wanted to be martyrs
While confirming their deaths, officials say photos may not be released in fear of backlash from his followers
For those who say "building 7 was structurally weak, and was about to collapse anyways- so BBC was reporting on it"...how the hell would anyone know that it was "about to collapse"? There was very little structural damage, and some random office fires...and if so, how did BBC obtain that information so fast? That it was weak, and about to collapse? And why was her live feed cut RIGHT after she reported it collapsing? Was that a coincidence too? True conspiracy theorists believe that crap...
TrevTrev25 3 days ago
@TrevTrev25 because firefighters on the ground were saying it was going to collapse for hours before it did?
talaxian1 3 days ago
Pull it don't mean to get firefighters out. Specific term used in real.estate biz, to pull a bldg means to demolish it via controlled demolition. It don't mean pull firefighters cuz none were in there. Bldg unstable, evacuated b 4 noon. U. R reaching! Gal from BBC,love 1st day truth 'financial district'-looks like the aftermath of an atomic bomb++ covered with white dust. Mayor Guiliani says its not gonna get him down,its business as usual. City is locked down,cant go home! Luv it! Terror mayor
skitsy17 3 days ago
so she was wrong, so what? this doesn't mean anything
bellijklh 6 days ago
@buddyfreakinholly
if that was the case then why is larry on record saying he told the firefighters to "pull it" so pull it meant to get the firefighters out then if your last post is true the fire fighters had to be told by the building owner to get out as the collapse was going to happen. but of course they were out by11am and NIST final report shows freefall for 2.5 seconds so looks like your speculations dont hold up to testimony or obsevation
ladbroke8 1 week ago
america hahah a fuck place a fuck government a fuck president ..but some citizen are fuck...fuck illuminati
cityofrock 1 week ago
OMG! A reporter making a mistake? No way. That could never happen.
buddyfreakinhoIIy 1 week ago
@buddyfreakinhoIIy A reporter predicting the future though?
SpecialFXAnimation 1 week ago
@SpecialFXAnimation No one claims the reporter predicted the future. The firefighters said that WTC 7 was unstable and likely to collapse. The collapse was widely expected.
buddyfreakinhoIIy 1 week ago
@buddyfreakinhoIIy No, the firefighters were parroting information fed to them. They were as confused as everyone else that day. The fact that the firefighters said the building was about to collapse is actually evidence that it was intentionally demolished. Question: why would the destruction of a building with light damage and a few fires (all the photographic evidence supports this) fall into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds? You 're suffering from serious denial.
hpd707 5 days ago
a guy in a cave 10,000 miles away was responsible :/ QC
Quaaludedude714 1 week ago
They did this because obviously bbc is reported in england and im sure people in england dont know wat the wtc 7 looks like. Correct me if im wrong
marcheetoz 3 weeks ago
Though it is 10 years later ... 911 was a Inside Ritual offering
YoCuzwaasup 2 weeks ago
@marcheetoz you are wrong.
hillman1996killa 6 days ago
Exactly at what point does she says this???
remoney 1 month ago
Comment removed
1956jgray 1 month ago
hi.
gauzeandchess 1 month ago
GET UR FRIGGEN HEAD OUT OF THE WAY!
PhillyCloud123 1 month ago
Tom Hanks brought me here.
triffin 1 month ago
What a surprise. The Rothchild News Corporation got news of Building 7 early. BBC gets its news from Reuters (Rothschild owned).
historypoliticsbb 1 month ago 2
Hahaha EPIC FAIL
PaladinHludwig 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
• The shaking resulted from the use of a directed kinetic scalar weapon focused on building 7 using HAARP ELF (Extra Low Frequency) broadcasting. That would have weakened the structure significantly before they "pulled" the building with a small amount of sequentially detonated explosive charges. Building 7 was destroyed last because it was the command center for the 911 psyops.
altgeldrarities 1 month ago
BBC YOU ARE SOOOO BUSTED!!
ivandamico93 1 month ago
Cover up. Gosh this is so creepy.
MzChelxoxo 1 month ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
There are ALOT of gov insiders who know the TRUTH:
/watch?v=vcPB9rpt45Q
bassefa1984 1 month ago
I might not be able to explain the twin towers...But wtc 7was planned and executed .
sweetkellymay 1 month ago
People need to open their eyes and realize that there is a world government
guidonyk 2 months ago
@guidonyk So what if there is? that is not evil. If anything! a world government that can agree and work together with every country in the world is good!
23Blacklight 1 month ago
@23Blacklight fuck no...u wanna be turned into a communist world??...cuz thats what a world wide government would do...turn the whole world into communist..and make everyone "equal" ...but not equal...there would be no room for advancement...censorship of ridiculous things...they would eliminate free speech...some dude in china wrote like 4 blogs and got 9 years in prison because he criticized the government..do u want that???
guidonyk 1 month ago
@guidonyk And what is wrong with communism? (i don't actually what that in the world) you used an example of a bad communist country. Libya went to shit and that is capitalist? it doesn't matter what system of money a country uses. the problem at the end of the day is us. Our humanity doesn't allow us to move forward without leaving others behind. (Communism doesn't mean censorship and being trapped...no country has done it right yet).
23Blacklight 1 month ago
@23Blacklight ahhh i agree with your point with humanity and thats exactly where im going with this...communism doesnt mean censorship??but show me a good example of communism being used right and that argument shall be closed...
guidonyk 1 month ago
@23Blacklight .but as far a world wide government..how bout the U.S. congress recently passing the NDAA(national defense authorization act)which allows the government to detain any citizen without cause or trail for as long as they want...what makes you think legislation like this wouldnt be passed in a worldwide government??
guidonyk 1 month ago
@guidonyk Well that is the problem. Communism is a perfect 'theory' thats all. The reason it cannot work is because we are an imperfect race. (sad face).
And a world wide government would be hard...i doubt it would work either. But again. What is wrong? The theory, or us?
23Blacklight 1 month ago
@23Blacklight We are not the problem, the problem is a select few that keep stealing from us, and lying to us over and over.
22doodster87 4 weeks ago 3
@22doodster87 When i say 'us' I mean the human race. We together are just pathetic. We are all evil in some way. Even if we sometimes do good things at the end of the day everything would be better with just less of us.
23Blacklight 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
22doodster87 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@23Blacklight I agree with you somewhat. This is why we need to end welfare. Why steal from people and let corrupt bureaucracies decide how to distribute the money, esp whena lot of the income tax go to pay the interest payments of government debt. If I want to help a good person in need I will, but I would refuse to help a freeloader, and then there are people that just cant be helped. You can lead a horse to water but you cant make it drink.
22doodster87 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 Hey Snake, when are you going to explain your accusation that FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro had "foreknowledge" of 7's demolition, implying he was in on the inside job? Why are you claiming the firefighters are murderers?
TimReed22222 2 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
Am I the only one who heard booms when it went down? This was controlled, WTC7 for certain was.
OfficialGreenCheese 2 months ago
@OfficialGreenCheese Yes, you are. There were no "booms."
TimReed22222 2 months ago
this is genuine watched it live
jacob5ladder 2 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
BTW Snake I'm STILL waiting for you to explain your accusation that FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro had "foreknowledge" of 7's demolition, implying he was in on the inside job.
Why did you say that?
TimReed22222 2 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 "broadcast an unexpected disaster plus the reasons for it one hour too soon"
Wrong again! Actually, the collapse of 7 WAS expected, and the reasons were given by the firefighters who were on the scene. That is, after all, WHY they evacuated before it came down - or can't you figure that out?
TimReed22222 2 months ago
Good Game BBC...
RyuhiMitshama 2 months ago
illuminati 911 :)
Amer300986 2 months ago
Roithschilds' "Reuters" press released by drip feed to the BBC 1 hour too soon, They forgot daylight savings time.
London was 6 hours ahead of Manhattan that day, not 5.
They forgot to allow for British Summertime.
Therefore the script was timed prior to March 2001 ( prior to BST).
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago 2
@snakeskin2u2 Check and mate.
AltruisticAlbatross 2 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 Then why didn't they "forget" to report the PLANE CRASHES an hour early?
Or the COLLAPSES? They reported *those* on time - didn't they?
TimReed22222 2 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 Relevant to your theory!
The fact that NONE of the other stories or bulletins carried on BBC that day were mistimed proves you're a joke. How could they have been on-time for everything all day, then suddenly an hour early for this one story, then back on time again? Please explain how THAT works.
TimReed22222 2 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
and by the way this was broadcasted before the collapse, and BBC just happened to predict the collapse 20 min ahead of time and its exact results... that's whats really in question here.
MrWap4twenty 2 months ago
@MrWap4twenty
Yes exatly - plus the "reasons" for the "collapse" which had not yet happened.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
@MrWap4twenty the bbc didn't predict anything. the nyfd knew building 7 would collapse and made that info available to the media.
shoofirbin 2 months ago
anyone who thinks this is just a BBC error... is dumb. This is just another piece on top o a pile of fraud...
MrWap4twenty 2 months ago
The Rothschilds are not gods,they make mistakes, they are only human, as we all are !
They blew the gaff.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago
The illuminati card game from 1995 - (not the later one) - shows everything they did on 9/11 was to start a fake "war on terror".
It was all pre-scripted many years before.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago 2
Reuters press released one hour too soon for London studio. They allowed only 5 hours instead of the +1 for British Summertime.
The script was timed prior to BST = prior to March 2001
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 "The script was timed prior to BST = prior to March 2001"
If that were true, then they must have announced the plane crashes an hour too early as well - right? And each towers' collapse - right? And everything else that happened - right?
Oh wait - they didn't. Too bad :-)
TimReed22222 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
NO - please read what I said - they were on a drip feed being re-timed and released.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 Sooooooooooooo ... the "perps" drip-fed everyone EXCEPT the BBC correctly all day ... and drip-fed the BBC correctly all day UNTIL, suddenly, they were an hour early w/bld 7?
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight ...
TimReed22222 3 months ago
I saw this on TV when it happened. If that had been a screen clip behind her, then why wasn't this coverage repeated many times? Instead, it was yanked. 9-11 was an inside job to be certain the public wouldn't protest the Patriot Act, which has crippled our freedoms. In another 10 years our Constitution will be a frail shell of itself. How sad.
rainingshoes 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The live camera cannot be contested. It clearly shows 9/11 was a scam from beginning to end.
Insults, threats, intimidation, lies, disinformation and verbal abuse does not alter that fact.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
If she were standing in front of a screen, would she have had to step out of the camera view? Couldn't they have just switched the feed?
WTFukinshit 3 months ago
Obvious sock puppet is obvious
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The BBC press released at Manhattan ( + 5 hours) when they should have released at Manhattan( + 5 +1 daylight savings time = + 6).
The script was therefore laid down prior to the day and coming from a 3rd party.
That it was pre-scripted prior to the day with full intricate details of the "collapse" of the twin towers indicates that the whole scenario on 9/11 was pre-scripted = finely timed controlled demolitions.
The scam is caught on live camera.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
This seemed very damning to me for a couple seconds. Then I considered it for those seconds and came the the following conclusion: The reporter is in front of a green screen showing the NY skyline and the video being played is of the skyline ~20 minutes earlier. Isn't the most reasonable explanation for this? Let me emphasis I am not an expert, nor have I drawn any final conclusions on any 9/11 conspiracy theories. But this video is far from conclusive to me. Your thoughts would be appreciated.
TheJackLasley 3 months ago
@TheJackLasley
You are entirely wrong firstly for the simple reason that you started your calculations with the presumption that there must be a reasonable explanation for what you see and hear.
Firstly, there is NOT, The script is not only faked and showing an impossible scenario, but is also broadcast one hour too soon.
Secondly, you can only assume that Jane is standing in front of a "green screen" because you cannot see how she could be so clairvoyant. She is NOT (on both counts).
Sorry !
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@snakeskin2u2 this was broadcasted before the collapse, and BBC just happened to predict the collapse 20 min ahead of time and its exact results... that's whats really in question here.
MrWap4twenty 2 months ago
@TheJackLasley
However, it IS good that you only considered the truth for two seconds.
Some achievement I suppose.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 How are you so sure she is not in front of a green screen? I am not saying she is or isn't. I am just presenting this as a very likely and simple explanation.
TheJackLasley 3 months ago
@TheJackLasley
Nonsense - it was proven ten years ago as a genuine live transmission.
Why don't you research it if you have any doubts ?
The sunlight effects and open sliding window can not be faked with a screen.
Why don;t you look at it ?
Because YOU are just a fake screen matey !
Go and get a proper job.
Your cause is long lost, and they shall soon be coming for you.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 I am just raising questions. No need to insult me.
TheJackLasley 3 months ago
@TheJackLasley just to let you know- that snakeskin person is insane.
shoofirbin 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 Hey, Snake, when are you going to explain what you meant when you said FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro "knew personally that building 7 was rigged to come down at a certain time." Yes or no - was he in on the inside job?
TimReed22222 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheJackLasley this was broadcasted before the collapse, and BBC just happened to predict the collapse 20 min ahead of time and its exact results... that's whats really in question here.
MrWap4twenty 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The scam is recorded on live camera and cannot be denied.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
You just said that they prescript and then that its ridiculous to say that they pre script. How can they anticipate that the building would actually fall down when its never happened before?You don't have to answer that. The most unbelievable thing in the world is that that building would collapse in freefall just from fire and some falling debris.
LKaramazov 3 months ago
@LKaramazov "How can they anticipate that the building would actually fall down when its never happened before?"
Because they have EYES, EXPERIENCE, TRAINING and BRAINS. They SAW the building had major fire and damage, they KNEW they were unable to fight the fires (no water), they OBSERVED the building leaning & creaking.
Would YOU have gone into that building assuming you'd be safe because it's "never happened before"?
TimReed22222 3 months ago
Once again you failed to answer the question. Why did the BBC report something that didn't happen, and discussed it at length. Have an open mind. The architects and engineers for 9-11 have the guts to say what the others won;t say from fear of reprisal.
LKaramazov 3 months ago
@LKaramazov When news organizations anticipate an event - say, a celebrity is on his death bed, or the fire department has announced that a burning building cannot be saved and is expected to collapse - they don't wait until that event happens to write the press release, they prepare it IN ADVANCE.
I don't know how, exactly, the release ended up in that BBC anchor's hands prematurely - but it's certainly plausible, a HELL of a lot more so than the ridiculous everything-was-prescripted fantasy.
TimReed22222 3 months ago
Oh, and one more thing: "Discussed it at length"? Hardly! That's just typical truther embellishment.
The London anchor brings it up offering NO details whatsoever, then asks the reporter in NY - who clearly has no idea what he's talking about & moves on to another subject.
Great "at-length" discussion! lol
TimReed22222 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Incredible how all of you deniers can see in this video plain evidence that the media is lying, but you ignore the issue.You just refuse to break your conditioning.
LKaramazov 3 months ago
They cocked up. I think they were trying to make out it was live, when it wasn't. It was a repeat, a pre-recording or she wasn't in New York but a small studio in London.
footballmafia62 3 months ago
Seriously, how lame do you have to be to believe the "perps" would bother to pre-script everything??? What would be the point? Why not just blow the buildings & let the media report it as it happened? Why add HUNDREDS of conspirators to the payroll? WAY too risky to involve that many people.
It makes ZERO sense.
TimReed22222 3 months ago
@TimReed22222 but you fail to explain whats right in front of your eyes. YOu simply think that "they" wouldn't do what YOU wouldn't do.
LKaramazov 3 months ago
@LKaramazov "YOu simply think that "they" wouldn't do what YOU wouldn't do."
Oh, it's not that. It's just that your explanation is so ridiculously implausible. WHY would they go to so much trouble & take so much risk that's so utterly unnecessary?
TimReed22222 3 months ago
The transmission is proof that certain people knew that WTC7 was going to be on a timed demolition.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
The follwoing is confirmed.
They press released at Manhattan ( + 5 hours) when they should have released at Manhattan( + 5 +1 daylight savings time = + 6).
The script was therefore laid down prior to the day for such an error to occur.
That it was pre-scripted prior to the day with full intricate details of the "collapse" of the twin towers indicates that the whole scenario on 9/11 was pre-scripted = finely timed controlled demolitions.
Deduction of facts proves 9/11 was a scam
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 So wait - you're saying the BBC's error was one of daylight savings time, that their announcement of 7's collapse was made an hour too early?
But the announcement WASN'T an hour early, it was only 20 minutes early! So how do you figure? Were they supposed to be 40 minutes *late*? Please explain.
TimReed22222 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
It was one hour before the blanket PRESS RELEASE
It was twenty minutes before the EVENT
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
If you actually watch the video the newsreader explains.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
A press release of 30 to 40 minutes after an event is quite normal.
It was meant to be 40 minutes AFTER the event.
They press released 20 minutes BEFORE the event.
Release discrepancy = 1 hour too soon.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 "A press release of 30 to 40' after an event is quite normal."
Is it? Since when? Is that YOUR observation, or is there a source for that figure? Do they that teach that in journalism school?
What IS quite normal is to prepare a release for an anticipated event - like the collapse of a building they've been TOLD is expected to collapse - IN ADVANCE.
So in the world of possibilities, isn't ONE of them that someone at the BBC gave that pre-prepared release to the anchor too early?
TimReed22222 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
Listen you ignorant shill -
1) the newsreader states perfectly clearly "some short time ago".
That is generally meaning with newsflashes within the past hour.= 30 to 40 minutes average. + 20 m = 1 hour
2) The release was one hour prior to the blamket release to all other stations = 1 hour
3) the press release was clearly one hour too soon, - this is backed up by the sctipt if you listen to it.
4) the release clearly indicates the whole of 9/11 was a scam.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 "That ["some short time ago"] is generally meaning with newsflashes within the past hour.= 30 to 40 minutes average"
Says you. "some short time ago" really means WHATEVER the readers wants it to mean. Your 30-40' is totally made up, of course.
"The release was one hour prior to the blamket release to all other stations"
BULL. You have YET to prove there was any "blamket" release at all! Can you provide clips of all the other stations reading this statement AT THE SAME TIME?
TimReed22222 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
That 9/11 was a scam is proven throught ALL fields of reserach.
This video is not only evidential confirmation-through the witness of a live camera -for all of those conclusions, but is also in it's own right confrmation that 9/11 was pre-scripted, timed , controlled demolitions veiled as "terrorist attacks".
It is now time for action to be taken, and too late for arguments.
Your failed attempts to block or blacken this evidence has long ago failed.
It is now time for action.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 Yet another laughable lie courtesy of SnakeSkin!
"That 9/11 was a scam is proven throught ALL fields of reserach."
ALL fields? Hardly! Neither mainstream physics NOR mainstream civil engineering have accepted this 9/11 "scam." If you have any doubts, google "ASCE world trade center" and you'll find numerous papers by the nation's leading structural engineers - ALL of which point to plane-crash damage & fires as the cause; NONE indicate controlled demolition.
TimReed22222 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
You are living in the past my firiend, and will soon have to answer for your actions.
Arguments over 9/11 are long since past.
It has been proven over and over.
You are now a sad relic of the past.
The next stage has already begun.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 Great non-response, my friend! Way to live up to the low standards you truthers have set for yourselves!
BTW we're STILL waiting for you to explain your implication that FDNY Chief Nigro was in on the inside job when you made this statement: "If anyone stated the building was likely to collapse" - as Chief Nigro did - "then he knew personally that is was rigged to come down at a certain time."
Gonna man up & explain yourself?
TimReed22222 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
Why don't you just watch the video and listen to what is said,
instead of asking me what was stated.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
IThe BBC press released 1 hour too soon with a pre-scripted release.
I did not state it was their own script.
The press release was obviously from a third party for such an error to occur.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 "It was meant to be 40 minutes AFTER the event."
Of course you can PROVE this? Can you provide evidence that all the OTHER media read the same release exactly 40' AFTER the collapse?
You are lying, of course - AGAIN. The anchor isn't reading any press release AT ALL in this video! Watch it again; he remarks on the collapse in matter-of-fact terms, then asks the correspondent in New York (who BTW clearly has no idea what he's talking about). No press release.
TimReed22222 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
The press release was one word for word made on all media outlets one hour later,
excepting for BBC and 1 or two others.
The release clearly states that the "collapse" had occurred "some time ago".
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 I agree.
LKaramazov 3 months ago
@LKaramazov
No need to respond with people who deny facts, my friend.
He has failed many times to answer simple questions from me because he has no evidence.
He is just a sad relic of the past who honestly needs to get a proper job - although I very much doubt that he would be suitable for any form of task.
This video is - in it's own right - full and irrefutable, undeniable evidence that 9/11 was pre-scripted.
That fact is captured by live camera and is established - It cannot be contested.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 Hey, Snake, I'm STILL waiting for you to explain what you meant when you said FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro "knew personally that [building 7] was rigged to come down at a certain time." How can you accuse the CHIEF of the fire department of being part of the conspiracy - especially since they lost so many of men that day? Stop cowering & explain yourself!
TimReed22222 3 months ago
The live transmission clearly shows that wtc7 "surprise disaster" was merely timed controlled demolition.
That is full confirmation of all research on the subject.
That fact cannot be argued against. It is caught on live camera.
The live transmission also proves the whole of the 9/11 scenario was pre-scripted demolition veiled as terrorist attacks.
You really should watch it.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The live transmission clearly shows that WTC7 was demolished to a pre-scripted schedule.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
Yep. The government orchestrated the magic trick with masterful precision, yet left a 47 story smoking gun. Uh-huh. The BBC was in on it too.
It was known that building 7 was going to collapse hours before it did. It surprised no one who was paying attention on that day (like me).
9/11 was an outside job. Period.
ryeb00 3 months ago
@ryeb00
This video on it's own merit, without referring to any other evidence proving controlled demolition ( which in actual fact is confirmed through all fields of research) quite simply shows that the whole of 9/11 was pre-scripted = controlled.
The BBC did not know my friend. They would not have released such damning evidence through a live transmission if they had. They withdrew the programme from available download (highly unusual)within a few hours, but copies had already been taken.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@ryeb00
There is a whole multitude of evidence that proves 9/11 was pre-scripted/controlled, however it is not necessary to refer to any of it as this video alone does all of that.
Why don't you watch it ?
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@ryeb00
Oh !, and by the way ( while you are having your period)
Steel frame buildings cannot and never will be known to be "going to collapse hours before".
Physically impossible without first being totally gutted - and even then the frame is left standing.
Do your research, Buddy Buddy.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 "Do your research"
LOL. I love that one. What you call 'research' is in reality the practice of internalizing a lot of debunked lies. It's going to take you years to unlearn all of that crap disguised as knowledge.
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."
Stephen Hawking
ryeb00 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 Everyone who was paying attention that day knew that building 7 was going to collapse. It's why the firefighters were ordered to evacuate hours before. As part of your 'research', you should include the testimonies of the firefighters who WERE ACTUALLY THERE
h t t p : / / sites . google . c o m /site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofthewithdrawalfromwtc
ryeb00 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 Here's just one example: "It could have been an hour, hour and a half we were doing that before we were ordered to move away from that part of Tower No. 1 because there was an imminent danger of collapse of World Trade Center No. 5 and 7." –Firefighter Vandon Williams
ryeb00 3 months ago
@ryeb00
Yes, quite, a few people ( including Reuters) knew the building was going to collapse from cointrolled demolition.
The evidence is on live camera. Why don't you watch it.
Buildings cannot collapse for no reason, my friend. this is the real world, not your fantasy one.
Steel frames cannot collapse vertically. - physically impossible. If they could then all the demolition experts would be out of a job.
The hard evidence of the live camera.SHOWS what happened = controlled
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 "The collapse had damaged 7 World Trade Center ... It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we wouldn't lose any more people." - FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro
NOW - where does Chief Nigro mention controlled demolition?
TimReed22222 3 months ago
@TimReed22222
You cannot argue third hand hearsay against the hard evidence of a live camera which confirms controlled demolition, and also backs up all fields of research on the subject. If anyone stated the building was likely to collapse, then he knew personally that is was rigged to come down at a certain time.
Those are the facts = controlled.
The live transmission from the BBC is the icing on the cake confirmation/witness of controlled demolition.
Anything else you wish to know ?
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 "If anyone stated the building was likely to collapse, then he knew personally that is was rigged to come down at a certain time."
WAIT - so you are saying that Daniel Nigro, CHIEF of the Fire Department of New York, had PRIOR KNOWLEDGE that building 7 was "rigged" for demolition? Is THAT what you're saying? That the chief of the FDNY was in on it???
TimReed22222 3 months ago
@TimReed22222 I think that some people would claim that VICTIMS were in on it before they concede that building 7 was not demo'd.
ryeb00 3 months ago
@snakeskin2u2 You need to admit to yourself that everything you think you know about structural engineering or demolition was learned on a conspiracy site. It is a fact that a steel structure, if left to burn uncontrolled indefinitely, will eventually collapse. The firefighters decided to abandon the effort to stop building 7 from burning. They knew that that meant it was going to eventually collapse. It surprised no one who was paying attention. i was paying attention that day. Were you?
ryeb00 3 months ago
Show this video to a person, I mean sheeple sherson sheep dumb ass ignorant retard that still thinks 911 attacks was from another country. Show this video to one of them & they will still not believe. They will still be in denial.
G0FlyAKite1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The live camera clearly shows "surprise collapse" of WTC7 was merely a timed demolition. The script proves even more.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
Comment removed
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
shes a seek, shes a stupid reporter, poor womem
papoulos2 3 months ago
Simple deduction of facts given in this video alone prove that not only WTC7, but the whole of the 9/11 scenarion was pre-scripted = timed = controlled.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is not possible to pre-script events that take you by surprise
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The script was written prior to the day - pre-written, resulting in press release time error Manhattan / London. The amount of detail indicates long before.
The script concerning the "collapse" of building 7 relies totally on the "official reasons" for the collapse of the twin towers indicating that all 3 "collapses" were pre-timed / pre-scripted / pre-planned.
== conclusion controlled demolition in all three cases.
snakeskin2u2 3 months ago
PARANOID.. Read Bin Laden statements. Al Queda & Iraqi Baath were at odds. There was no involvement to find with the US, only with the anti Soviet ISI . Bin Laden, superstitious salafi Muslim, with the raving religiosity of an Abraham or Moses. Your US Govt was inept and bumbling, not clever. As for anyone believing Saddam had WMDs, a conspiracy would have found planted WMD's, not be empty handed. Conspiracy for what? Oil supply given back, the US will leave Iraq & Afghanistan at huge cost.
nzobriens 4 months ago
so a building which was in danger of collapse was reported to have fallen before it actually did, and you think this is evidence of something? lmao
Tommy4216 4 months ago
No plane struck building seven. It had fires burning on a few floors that it was designed to easily withstand. One of the leading demolition experts in Europe took one look at the footage and said it was without question a controlled demolition. 1200 architectural specialists have risked their reputation to campaign for the truth on this specific issue. Building seven is the smoking gun. they did this right out in the open and the people believed whatever they were told.
mrkamikaze101 4 months ago
The 1st report of an inside job came from a HAMAS propaganda newspaper. Ramzi Yusuf planned 911 with OBL $. Terror continues while Israel builds on land or holds land taken from neighbors Syria, Lebanon, Jordan & Egypt (& the Palestinians). Secrets always leak and a 911 inside job does not stand up to scrutiny. Who killed Kennedy? Lincoln? Lady Diana? who plotted Roswell & Pearl Harbour? Zionist & NWO conspirators? The USA couldn't even keep the A Bomb secret, Govts change, people always talk.
nzobriens 4 months ago
@nzobriens they haven't kept it a secret, people come forward with more and more evidence all the time, you just hand wave it because you already decided to believe whatever fox news tells you to.
cyberpsygen7 4 months ago
@cyberpsygen7 I read about the Bojinka plot BEFORE 911 and we don't get Fox News on New Zealand TV, (no loss from what I hear. Do you also think the Moon landing was a hoax, Father Christmas really does live at the North Pole and your mum didn't do it with your dad. Grow up, Governments include advisors who lose their jobs every few years, they blab. So called elite soldiers write memoirs and people like to talk. Of your best friends, how many of those ladyboys can keep a secret? People talk.
nzobriens 4 months ago
@nzobriens good try pretending im crazy for trusting the same government that intentionally lied about WMD and Al Queda connection to start a war with Iraq. you just blew your own credibility.
at least 5 wargames were being run on 9/11 that confused the authorities and moved interceptors out of the areas. shouldn't the official investigation have found the leaks that couldn't keep those secret from the terrorists and the exact nature of their involvement with them?
the official report did not
cyberpsygen7 4 months ago
If you want to know the ACTUAL truth about building 7 check under 'conspiracy theories' at ItWasTyped. com
Any conspiracy theorist who reads that and still believes in this controlled demolition crap is a friggin moron. Use your brains people! peace
culturebully3 4 months ago
@culturebully3 I just went there, and it was a one sided debate.
Even if the buildings all fell because of the planes, the shit is still an inside job.
WONDOCTORJ 4 months ago
@WONDOCTORJ thats because there is no debate to be made on the other side. ItWasTyped deals with logic and evidence, for which there is plenty to support the official story and NONE to support this dumbass inside job crap. dont you get it? all you conspiracy theorists are wasting your lives worrying about some fantasy BS
ItWasTyped. com... there's plenty more posts like the one u mentioned explaining everything logically. Admit it, you have no response to the argument on that site
culturebully3 4 months ago
@culturebully3 UUUhhhmmmmm......I don't know if it was an inside job or not for sure. I do know that I studied more EVIDENCE then most, and I lean towards the inside job side.
People like you believe anything the government tells you.
Kinda like how undercover cops were at the front line of the occupy wall street march on the brooklin bridge posing has protesters, later seen in their cop uniforms.
Your government loves you, don't worry, go back to sleep.
That matrix steak tastes sooo good !
WONDOCTORJ 4 months ago
@WONDOCTORJ once again, you are wrong my son. i dont deny for a second that the government/media lie to us, to an extent. however it takes a rational, intelligent person to separate the lies from the facts, and to find GOOD evidence of what we believe. you have NO EVIDENCE of any of this inside job crap, u believe it to feel better about yourself and so that u can have someone to blame the worlds problems on. wake up little boy, have a read at ItWasTyped. com and you may escape from la la land x
culturebully3 4 months ago
@culturebully3 Uhhhmmmmm....how do you know I have NO evidence of the inside job crap?
Do you know what they say about ASSuming?
WONDOCTORJ 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WONDOCTORJ because you dont show any, all you do is talk the usual conspiracy theorist "open your eyes" "youre so brainwashed" "go back to sleep" bullshit without any evidence to back up your claims. you never have any because it doesnt exist! idiot!
ItWasTyped. com .. intelligent, rational people welcome
culturebully3 4 months ago
Green screen or not, I guess nobody bothered to realize 5:07 PM EST was 14 minutes before 7 collapsed into it's footprint with no resistance throughout the entire structure AKA free fall.
N1k1mon 4 months ago
gulf of tonkin people...council on foreign relations member gary hart wrote a letter to iran saying that gulf of tonkin and uus maine were false flags, that america has a history and will use that again if needed against iran...
MrCrazyb23 4 months ago in playlist Liked
Comment removed
shoofirbin 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrCrazyb23 this video is about wtc 7. shrilly chanting "gulf of tonkin" in response to the disparate details of 9/11 amounts to nothing more than pure laziness.
shoofirbin 4 months ago
The script was written prior to the day - pre-written, resulting in press release time error Manhattan / London. The amount of detail contained in the script would indicate a long long time beforehand, possibly years. (pre-planned).
The script concerning the "collapse" of building 7 relies totally on the "official reasons" for the collapse of the twin towers indicating that all 3 "collapses" were pre-timed / pre-scripted / pre-planned.
== conclusion controlled demolition in all three cases.
snakeskin2u2 4 months ago
No Justice. No Peace. No Hope. No America. Lets get our country back.
okturus 4 months ago
Yeah, there is the building 7 right behind her, notice how it is "engulfed" in flames, with smoke coming from it. All pictures ever taken of building 7 show such inconsequential fires on various floors it's not even funny. Almost no fires at all as a matter of fact. You can't even see any damage.
If anyone would like to stop spouting your lying government/media propaganda BS and show a picture of something different, go ahead. But you can't, because you are liars who protect liars.
MsMaggieOC 4 months ago
@MsMaggieOC Actually, almost all pictures show a crazy amount of fire and smoke, and the building being engulfed in flames. Either you chose to ignore the evidence that 911 was NOT an inside job, or you are blind/ retarded.....Take your pick?
TZMareThieves3 4 months ago
@TZMareThieves3 wow show me clips where building 7 was in a blaze?
/Atbrn4k55lA show me the blaze
/8T2_nedORjw show me a blazing fire! oh wait you can't because there wasn't one!
1FzxcKoOVUg
so much proof it was an implosion yet your too blind to see
sh9683 4 months ago
BBC News Report
Late on 6-10, US & British Special Forces launched a daring night time raid on a house in the besieged Libyian town of Sirte, after recieving word that the ousted dictator Colonel Muammar Gaddafi was hiding there
Plans to capture him quickly went wrong as mercenaries opened fire. In a brief firefight, it was clear that Gaddafi & 1 of his sons wanted to be martyrs
While confirming their deaths, officials say photos may not be released in fear of backlash from his followers
???
FamousNoName 4 months ago
talk about behind the scenes
Americans should know that 99.9% of the media is governed by politics
and 9/11 was and inside job
wsmshrb 5 months ago 2
Building 7 was an obvious controlled demolition job.
P0ETRYHOUND 5 months ago in playlist WTC Building 7
B ullshitting
B ritain for [nearly] a
C entury
DJCW 5 months ago