Uh huh....Ron Paul "be" weak with the military. Right.
Sort of like, you know, the fact that, in Q4 2011, he got TWICE as much donations from active duty military, than ALL of the other candidates combined, including Barak Obama?? And then he got SIX TIMES more than any other Republican candidate??
Oh yeah...he "be" weak with the military all right!
For the Record: I am a Paul supporter... but the fact that people like you are makes it hard for sensible people like myself to admit it publicly... All of us aren't idiotic hypocritical racist super Christians... just a thought.
Actually...to your your words..."just a thought"....you need to turn the mirror back on yourself and look at who is being the prejudiced one here.
And you call yourself a Ron Paul supporter?? Really?? Your bigoted response here is exactly the opposite of what the good doctor believes and practices so maybe you are mistakenly talking about somebody else.
@sonbarably hate to break it to you but the term illuminati has been around a lot longer then Hollywood. As to what it is now I can't say but it was a real organization at one time at least. And many would argue it continues today.
you guys are fanatics. "well dr paul says what he wants in front of an audience (knowing he can never win) so therefore he won't be corrupted by the "bankers" or "lobbyists" or whatever special interest group.
Great video I do not know why republicans do not even consider ron Paul I want him to be our president. I honestly have not cared in years who gets elected but this time I am behind ron Paul 100%.
Ron Paul seeks to cut ALL foreign aid, including Israel. That's a good idea. Israel should not seek aid from a Christian Nation, Judism judges Jesus Christ to be a false Messiah and a curse. They vehemently oppose any type of conversion efforts especially from Evangelicals. So the idea of a Christian nation such as the U.S. giving Israel aid is probably the biggest behind the scenes joke in Israel.
I say the Jewish people throughout the world should supply foreign aid to Israel. Not the U.S.
@sickofcommies Actually, Ron Paul is a free market capitalist. He is the opposite of a communist. He subscribes to the Austrian school of economics, which are pretty much as free market as you can be.
@sickofcommies Cultural marxist? What are you smoking? and his foreign policy is capitalistic. He wants free trade. That does not make it "pro Jihad". "Pro Jihad" is going to the middle east and bombing them and putting embargoes on middle eastern countries.
@ElAsaltaCulos2 Pro-Marxist and pro-jihadist is blaming the USA and Israel for Islamo-Nazism.Now back to your gay marriage and heroin and mosques at ground zero, Ron Paul stuff.
Israel can support itself, it's a first world country, time for the americans to help their own. It's not like Israel is alone anyway she has a lot of friends not just the americans.
@HeartOnMySleeve77 it's quite simple. Its not the fact that Ron Paul doesn't support Israel, he respects their sovereignty as a nation that is well off enough to set their own agenda. Like others have said, the United States gives money to Israel while also giving money to the very people that hate them. What sense does that make? He wants to allow Israel to be Israel... without overbearing influence of the United States government.
@HeartOnMySleeve77 Ron Paul would stop sending aid to the countries surrounding Israel, which would be a net GAIN for them since we currently send 6x as much money to Israel's neighbors as we send to Israel. Furthermore, he would return Israel's sovereignty. For Ron Paul's support of Israel, back when Israel took out a nuclear reactor in Iran, Ron Paul was one of only 4 congressmen who voted against formally denouncing Israel's actions because he said they have the right to defend themselves.
@HeartOnMySleeve77 "Doesn't support Israel" is a little extreme and is the use of political rhetoric. His concerns are that we give Israel 3 billion dollars in foreign aid every year and give the surrounding nations that want Israel obliterated 6 billion dollars each year. He wants to cut off foreign aid completely, because when Israel is taking money from us they are subjected to our authority. Paul wants to make Israel sovereign and let them decide for themselves without having to please us.
@HeartOnMySleeve77 Hmmm. Doesn't support Israel? Is he supposed to? Where is that written? Do you mean the state of Israel carved out of land stolen from the Palestinians just like the British stole land from the Irish & subjugated the entire island of Ireland? That? Ron Paul would behave as he always has--in accord w/his oath to support the Constitution. Do you support that? Cuz if you do, you must support the cessation of all foreign aid, including that which goes illegally to Israel.
Israel can support itself, it's a first world country, time for the americans to help their own. It's not like Israel is alone anyway she has a lot of friends not just the Americans.
I love how the media pundits say Ron Paul is not supported by the Tea Party. In fact on a recent show Rush Limbaugh laughed hysterically when a caller claimed the Tea Party would rally behind Paul. Rush went on to say that there was no way this would happen and even mentioned that it wasn't Paul who started the Tea Party. Of course anyone with a brain in their head knows Rush is full of it.
Kudos to Blue Republicans who don't tow your party line and can think past a gang-herd mentality and register Republican for a year to vote Ron Paul 2012 in your state primaries.
Mishanne, thank God Almighty I don't have to register Republican in California. I can just stay as I am, and vote for what's right just as I am. : ) Kudos to you Republicans who are voting on integrity, honesty, and logic, and principle, and not caving to Neo-Con fascist perversion of the conservative platform. Ron Paul is your only TRUE CONSERVATIVE. I've read up on some of the original Republican platform. IT"S NOT WHAT THE NEW REPUBLICAN "CONSERVATISM" IS ALL ABOUT TODAY!
@Gluntion your democrat party is corrupt as well sir, even more than the republican corruption, they all are. THa'ts why i am a registered independent.
Themunz126...beautiful, opened for debate. I would say if you and others like you would wake up to our Nation's CIA covert operations of installing dictators and propping up puppet regimes, (if our overbloated ferderal government would change the, "enemy of my enemy is my friend" flawed foreign policies) and stop creating situation around the entire world that cause BLOW-BACK, then Ron Paul would be a "yes starter" for you, and whether you like it or not, he is the most credible candidate.
Well done. But I don't think he actually served in Vietnam. He was a Air Force flight surgeon in the Vietnam era, but I think he served else where, if I'm not mistaken.
Another independent voting for Ron, conservatives may not be on board with him 100% but he is your only candidate with any real appeal beyond the base, if it's "ABO" then you better pick Paul.
Ron Paul was not invited to the Republican Jewish Coalition conference in Washington this week (yet he supports Israel's independence, I.e. by voting to let Israel bomb supposed Iraqi nuclear facilities). Strange, or... perhaps Israel enjoy their big-blood-buddy-U.S-OF-Israel to leech-off for their blood-spilling.
To U.S. 'patriots'... does your 14-trillion debt amounting to over 80-trillion in future payments and growing making you feel a little anaemic at all?
If you're voting for Ron Paul, make sure you are registered as REPUBLICAN, otherwise you won't be able to. I was listed as "not declared" and I had to change it to Republican so I can vote for this amazing guy. DO IT!
You got it! You absolutely nailed it! After eating the journalist who had the show prior to her, CNN's Candy Crowly put up some bogus poll showing that Ron Paul would have only 4% of the independent vote if he won the GOP nomination. Those were completely bogus numbers. Your assessment is correct: nobody gets more independent votes than Ron Paul. That includes Obama.
@sakonhagakure I don't worship the man. If sold out his values and flip flopped on issues, he'd lose my support. But he has a long consistent record of standing up for what he thinks is right.
Reagan talked the talk, but didn't really walk the walk. Jefferson also tried to violate laws that he himself put into place once he became president.
and the same can be said about Ron Paul. Especially when it comes to earmarks. He said on cavuto in the same breath that he votes against all earmarks and then he says every penny should be earmarked. He games the system by loading up bills he knows are going to pass and votes against them so he can keep saying I didn't vote for that. (which he practically might as well have) He constantly pander's to the 9-11 truth movement but says those aren't his views.
@sakonhagakure Ok, bud, so tell me, if I am forced to pay for Social Security even though I am against it, should I refrain from collecting SS once I am eligible for it? Of course. His constituents are forced to pay money to the federal government, so he is trying to get money back. There is nothing hypocritical about that. Now, on the other hand, if they weren't forced to, and he was taking money from the federal government, that would be different.
@sakonhagakure He votes against the bills because he knows where he stands, what is so wrong with that? Because most of congress doesn't give a shit does not mean he should be like them.
And he doesn't pander to the truthers, but he is not going to push them away. Why should he push away people who support his message? He is different, so the media marginalizes him, so why he should push people away?
If he didn't pander to truthers then he wouldn't be a constant guest on Alex Jones' radio show. There's a video somewhere when he was confronted by a truther and his simple answer was he couldn't handle the controversy and had too much on his plate with the fed and whatnot.The best way to handle people like that is just like Howard Dean did in 04 and cut them off at the knees. Sometimes you have to tell some people don't support me.(like Don Black for instance.)
Personally I like Ron Paul but alot of Ron Paul supporters on the internet treat this man just as much as a messiah as the Obama supporters treated Barack during the 08 election.I like him but in a general election against Obama all these progressives that are supporting him now are going to go back to the other side and if you think people are playing the race card on him now just imagine what the obama administration will do to him because of those newsletters.
@sakonhagakure S what? so he should just give up? If it comes to mudslinging, it is easy to point out broken promises and corruption by Obama. Besides, those newsletters have been debunked.
A more precise comparison of Ron Paul to any past president would be to that of George Washington.
Washington proclaimed the U.S. neutral in the wars raging in Europe after 1793. He avoided war with Great Britain and guaranteed a decade of peace and profitable trade by securing the Jay Treaty.
Washington's Farewell Address was an influential primer on republican virtue and a warning against partisanship, sectionalism, and involvement in foreign wars.
@LambChowder1 So because he doesn't agree with something, he should not look out for the best interest of his constituents? So if you are against say..... Social Security, but you are FORCED to pay into it, should you not at least try to get some of it back? If his constituents were exempt from sending money to DC, then I would call him a hypocrite.
You're seriously comparing a man who's entire outlook on life is that morality shouldn't get in the way of self interest with the president who recognized that America's responsibility to fight evil was of paramount importance? I think you need to think about this.
@koyunbaba73 You mean the Nobel peace prize winning president who never closed gitmo; who just ended the Iraq war when Bush had scheduled it to end; who extended the Patriot Act; Who started another war and is bombing several more countries on top of that; who supported bailing out companies with public funds; Who just signed into law the NDAA; The man who had a 14-year old American killed? That guy? the man who took a 4 million dollar vacation while the country is broke?
I really like this video but I wish someone would make one like this explaining how Dr. Paul would phase out spending and not burn down everything all at once like some ppl fear.
Ron Paul will be a shock to the current system. That is why the mainstream media will not give him the time he needs to explain his position. Drastic situations call for drastic measures. We need a real change.
Ronald Reagan may be a name you hold up as an example of a good president, but he started this spending spree och he said deficits dont matter. What makes Ron Paul so much superior to Reagan is the fact that he understand austrian economics unlike Reagan who was a beliver in the chicago school. The later belived in active monetary policies from the FED
@Tr3xKuro Yeah, Ron Paul actually KNOWS economics, and not just the devil's advocate economics, but Hayekian Economics. Paul also knows foreign affairs far more than Reagan could've ever dreamed of. If anything, Reagan tried to be like Paul and failed.
@streetcrazykenny Ron Paul knows economics, but he has unfortunately subscribed entirely to a model that does not work well with compromise. He may be running for president, but the president can't force all the legislation he wants. He's going to have to learn to compromise. If I had a venn diagram of all the economic issues that he and the rest of the republican congressmen saw eye-to-eye on... and only those things were put into a bill... the american people would be fucked.
@samisyosam Understandable. But you're not taking into account that a President Paul would be completely different leader than former presidents. He's not going to get into bed with Congress, nor is he going to beg them. He'll go to Congress and compromise on smaller issues, and persuade on bigger issues. As a speaker, he can get the American people to go to their legislators.
@streetcrazykenny I think you're giving him the kind of messianic treatment that people gave Obama in 2008. The president can sit there and veto things, but he can't force legislators to vote the way he wants, even within his own party. Everyone in congress is corrupt as hell. They vote along lobby lines. The only thing that Ron Paul can do, aside from veto everything under the sun, is pass the few line-item things that he and the GOP agree with. And those things are dangerous.
@samisyosam What I think is you havnt paid attention to the republican movement at all hence your fear that he would not influence much at all. Bush Republicans for their time where not fiscal conservativves and looked towards government to spend and social engineer The United States. Republicans however since the Tea Party was formed in support of Ron Paul immediately changed the message. If Ron Paul said to audit the FED so did GOP if RP said this or that was unconstitutional so did the GOP.
@samisyosam Ron Paul may not be what every GOP member sees as Ideal but because of Bushs failure. A lack of trust in the old Bush GOP establishment, and Ron Pauls support from the Tea Party He has changed the message of Republican considerably, not on every topic but considerably. The Tea Party was so influential that GOP nominees changed their tune consistantly in an attempt to hijack some of its influence. Ron Paul has had much sway and influence in the GOP and will do so come election day
@streetcrazykenny idiotic statement. People like you stop progress from happening. Please know the man more. Sit with him, then tell me this crap.I'd trust him with my life, and I do. Please wake up. its like 1970 to you and your regurgitating Robert Downney Jr. words. Ket the women decide this one and go grab a beer. PLEASE
@bricitybrac I don't know how to break this to you gently, so I won't. Ron Paul's core followers, the first 10%, are the more educated than the rest of America by an order of magnitude. We just so happen to understand economics. Once you have read, and understood economics, as Mises, Hayek, Hazlitt or even Schiff has explained it in their seminal works, you will be able to appreciate your former ignorance in it's true unvarnished nature. Until then you are clearly what you derisively dismiss.
@bricitybrac I don't know how to break this to you gently, so I won't. Ron Paul's core followers, the first 10%, are more educated than the rest of America by an order of magnitude. We just so happen to really understand economics. Once you have read, and understood economics, as Mises, Hayek, Hazlitt or even Schiff has explained it in their seminal works, you will be able to appreciate your former ignorance in it's true unvarnished nature. Until then you are clearly what you derisively dismiss
Reagan.Again? Scary. Air controllers strike? Savings & loan? We need another Reagan like we need another corrupt brain dead President. And I voted twice for him, donated money & time to the GOP.
I'm kidding...the fact is the media has demonized him ...perhaps because the corporations that controls them are happy making billions from the bailouts and the military industry? ...and well....people go by the lies they are fed (and bred) so they are misinformed and they repeat "their" false opinion. We have a man offering freedom & liberty...the others offer bondage, debt & socialism...many "Americans" will choose socialism. It's sad but it's true. Are you a man or a mouse?
@mrsparex Great comment. Mirrors my sentiments exactly. Benjamin Franklin once said, "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Every time I hear some fearful neoconservative claim we need to give up our liberties in order to stop terrorism, I think to myself 'you coward!'. I would rather die due to a terrorist's bomb going off near me, than give up my liberty or my freedom.
Ron Paul is ok but I like Mitt Romney better. Romney will secure our borders and turn off the magnets that draw illegal aliens here. Ron Paul will help illegal aliens by preventing the police from arrested them on drug charges. Romney all the way.
@Armornone Nah, Romney is all talk, typical politician, the one guy who has a proven track record of fighting liberal policy is Newt Gingrich. He will fight harder to defeat Obama than Ron Paul or Mitt Romney will. He is a solid conservative and can surgically dissect Obama in a debate better than any other of the candidates.
@weseyedwalk Newt Gingrich talks the talk but he does not walk the walk. Newt wife just found out that she had cancer at the hospital and then asked her for a divorce that very same day. Newt also is weak on illegal immigration and has a of other problems as well. Romney has a proven track record despite being behind enemy lines in Massachusetts. Its like when you have liberal teacher so you are afraid to say anything conservative. Well Romney was in Massachusetts and is still conservative.
@Armornone1:25 to disprove any illusions that Mitt Romney is consistent on anything but Pandering and Selling out. /watch?v=uPSf6KPaeXo&feature=feedu
@Armornone Nah, Newt is a fighter, he is the only one is the debates pointing out the truth about the liberal mediator and their designer questions that serve as a turkey shoot, while Romney is over there kissing ass, like a girl, why? I can't respect that. Look Romney is better than Obama sure, but New isn't weak on anything, he is unapologetic and a fighter. Romney has a track record of flip flopping, socialized medicine? I can't respect that, he is the standard politician dude.
@weseyedwalk Newt Gingrich supported TARP, Torture, the current Foreign Policy, wants government to interfere in the market place, and that he would like to pass his "variation" of Obamacare.
Newt is simply the latest bandwagon candidate that people like because of the words he is saying now not the actions he has taken. Obama talked about hope and change; his actions were different. Ron Paul is the only honest candidate who will do what he says. Let's try honesty.
@YaHuWaHservant Newt Gingrich supported TARP, Torture, the current Foreign Policy, wants government to interfere in the market place, and that he would like to pass his "variation" of Obamacare. The only one I believe is torture, and I am all for it also, fuck, everybody who thinks pouring a cup of water on someone it torture,, high school gym class was tougher, are you serious, we water board our own soldiers for practice, how can it be torture. Do you have evidence of the rest?
@weseyedwalk Newt appeared with Nancy Pelosi to come out in favor of Global warming. /watch?v=qi6n_-wB154.
I think you need to get your facts straight. Romney never supported socialized medicine? Where do you get these lies? He will stop Obamacare in day 1 in office! What else do you want. He enabled local police to arrest illegal aliens in Massachusetts. Newt has a D- on the issue of illegal aliens and hang out with a lot of liberals. Newt is not the person you think he is. Stand with Mitt!
@Armornone Romney set up socialized medical care in Massachusetts, dude everybody knows this, that's one of the biggest bones everybody has to pick with Romney. As far as Newt in the video you showed me, sure climate change is real, nobody disputes that, and nobody disputes we should be prepared, what we dispute is that it is caused solely by humans. Look if it comes down to Mitt Romney vs. Obama, sure I will be voting for Mitt Romney, but why doesn't he fight harder like Newt?
@Armornone I see Newt talking more shit about liberal than any other candidate and he wants to secure the border and enforce the law. He wants to stop letting just anyone in our country.
@weseyedwalk He supported the " dream" act which gives instate tuition for illegal aliens. He also appeared witih Nancy Pelosi for a global warming commercial. Newt talks out of both sides of his face and has a D- with numbersusa which is an anti-illegal immigration website which I donate money to. Newt talks the talk but does not walk the walk. He also divorced his wife and make her sign the papers on her death bed in the hospital. He has had 3 wives and is a jerk. No thank you to Newt.
@Armornone yeah, He did not divorce his wife the day she got cancer, that's a twist, he was at odds with a long time and planning to divorce her long before she got cancer, and the global warming commercial which I saw doesn't mention man made global warming, only global warming, ok so what, I only contest man made global warming. Would you rather have Obama again? Ron Paul is a nut job, Herman Cain is losing too much to salvage, the rest are either more of a compromise or off the map
@weseyedwalk Romney is clearly the smartest and most articulate debater on the stage. He is a brilliant man and fits all the major criteria. He wants to secure the border( Which Newt, Perry, Paul, Huntsman) don't. He wants lower taxes, he is tough on terrorist,etc... What more do you want? No one is perfect but you choose the best guy you can. You have deal with the candidates on stage to beat Obama. Romney is the guy Obama is most scared of for a reason. The guy is good and conservative.
@Armornone Well Romney thought it was ok to set up socialized medical care in MA, no thanks Romney, and Newt Gingrich is a better orator and debater and a tougher fighter than Mitt, I'll give you this, Mitt would be better than Obama, but not the best, that is why Mitt Romney is polling third now and New Gingrich is first, Newt won't put up with bullshit, he will lock down the border, stop China from Screwing us, get jobs back and cut spending. I believe him over Romney, sorry.
@Armornone But if it comes down to Romney vs Obama of course I will vote for Mitt Romney, at least Mitt Romney sees himself as an American. Not like the piece of shit in the white house mutherfucker. If Romney wins I will back him up, but I disagree that he is the best choice.
@Armornone I will say one more thing, i respect you for backing up your boy Romney, at least you are not defending Obama, damn I can't stand those people. I still respect people like you that recognize the disaster that is Obama. peace.
@Armornone If those are my only two options I would keep my money.
Given the option, I would prefer a system where I give only a portion of my money to the government so that they can spend it on roads, school, healthcare etc.
@HeavyMetalCanuck Well that is pretty much what most local state governments do. The federal government is suppose to protect us with military, secure border, capture terrorist. However, it has gotten out of control and the country will be screwed unless we can get spending under control. Look, dude, just vote for Romney ok. Newt is a jackass bastard. Actually, vote for anyone except Newt or Huntsman.
@Armornone I'm actually Canadian haha. But if I were an American to vote republican... hmmmm... It probably would be for either Ron Paul or Romney. I like Paul's libertarianism (legalize weed) and his idea to get out of foreign countries and focus on defense from home. But he gets a little extreme on other areas that I don't like. Romney seems a moderate and fairly reasonable dude.
@HeavyMetalCanuck Why don't you worry about Canadian political system? Why are you looking at an election for a place you don't live or have the ability to vote for. Seems like a waste of time.
@Armornone I know its weird. Canadian politics is much more boring. And America has lots of influence over our country, so your election does have some effect on us.
Ronald Reagan wasn't naive about Islam and terrorism and the plot against Israil and the U.S., Ron Paul is. Reagan was a true conservative, when he was elected he didn't mess around, he threatened to bomb if our citizens weren't released from the muslim terrorists. The Americans were released right away.
Great to see you're not "conditioned" to think "that" way, whatever that means (if only I had a dollar for every time I heard Paul supporter utter that phrase!). All the sound effects, quick editing and such can't hide the fact you're behind a reactionary, racist, misogynistic old asshole. He will never be president, get that in your head already.
Ron Paul doesn't seem like a strong leader that enemies would fear. He seems like a feeble old man. I love some of his ideas, but I would be scared to death to have him at the helm in a war.
if you don´t understand free market economics (austrian economics), some of Ron Paul ideas sound crazy and absurd. the constitution limited the federal goverment to only few things (less than 20).
@migu9999 they sound just "crazy" to you because YOU have been conditioned to think that way.....as you said, if you do NOT understand something, go and make an effort to gain understanding ! Ron Paul is ON THE MONEY !
Well lets just see if FreeMason Ron Paul will ACT on his views rather than just hold em like 'controlled opposition' must to convince us on the dialectic front...who knows... God does...(o0) GBY
WELL DONE! LET'S HAVE REVENGE ON ALL THE LIARS AND THIEVES IN OUR GOVERNMENT, BIG BANKERS AND CORPORATE MOBSTERS! RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT! AND I'M TALKIN' TWO TERMS! yeeeeee-hawwww!
I don't support Ron Paul for 1 reason, his isolationists views, when asked what he would do with a nuclear armed Iran. Paul answered "I'd be friends with them". This seems a bit naive and dangerous to me.
@intrepidorator EXACTLY!!! For all the good that Ron Paul demonstrates, his ideas about the rest of the world are naive at best. If I didn't believe that having Ron Paul as president would lead to the bloodiest war in human history, I might be more supportive. People nowadays have no perspective--having always lived in peace and safety.
@intrepidorator we seem to have no problem with Pakistan, India, Israel, the Korea's, Japan, China, Russia, South Africa having nukes. If you support the right to bear arms why can't the Persians use that right aswell??
@kubaniski Your list of countries with nuclear weapons is incorrect, To correct this error I will list the countries with nuclear weapons. 1. America 2. Russia 3. United Kingdom 4. France 5. China 6. India 7. Pakistan 8. North Korea and 9. Isreal.I do not support any other nations "right" to possess bombs capable of destroying cities.I oppose Iran having nukes because they will use the on Isreal the first chance they get. Nukes are a deterrent for the USA they are a tool for the iranians.
@kubaniski Because they have publicly declared their intention of destroying Israel and the U.S., it's kinda like saying why can't a known criminal bear arms even though he's a convicted felon.
@weseyedwalk Oh please....do you REALLY believe Iran is gona attack anybody? Come man ! grow up ! stop falling for the corporate media war propaganda ! The REAL enemy is NOT "over there" it is OVER HERE. Hiding within Washington and our monetary system: The Private Bankers who own and control the PRIVATE Federal Reserve, the military industrial complex, the big insider cabals who keep robbing us blinds and keep pushing us to more and more useless imperial wars ! WAKE UP !!!
@0815funkmaster YOur partially right, we do have enemies in our government, but our government is right now a tug of war between those who are trying to stop them. But you need to study history, study the Qur'an look at all the world terrorism going on, look at the bombing that took place in Nigeria as a threat? Iran has nukes now, why?for fun?they have declared publicly they want U.S. destroyed and Israel, they don't play around, YOU need to WTFU man. Your propagandized not me
@weseyedwalk In a tug of war ....LOL...A. this is NOT "our" Government ! It does not serve WE the people anymore, It serves globalist Bankers, Special interests, the plutocratic families and the insider Corporations. I really don't worry AT ALL about Iran...that is just some more war mongering to distract us and use as a smoke screen for their Globalist New World Order Agenda. I doubt Iran will invade us anytime soon. But the Bankers with their minions in Government surly did a great job !
@0815funkmaster Why should you worry about Iran?, they've only developed nuclear weapons in the shadows of lies while publicly declaring intention of the muslim kingdom to destroy the U.S. and Israel. China and Russia have threatened us if we attack Iran's nuclear plant. Iran has sent 100,000 missiles and rockets to Syria, Gaza, Jordan etc. for a retaliation attack if Israel bombs the Iranian nuclear weapons plant. "Nothing to see here, move on" left propaganda bullshit?, yes.
@weseyedwalk And also, I really don't give a flying fart about Zionist Israel! Why do worry about them ? What did they have ever done for us then get is involved in their stupid Tribal wars. Let THEM worry and care about THEIR country and WE worry about ours....how is that ?!
@0815funkmaster Israel is our friend and we need friends these days and they need us, remember WW2? only because of the alleys were we able to stop evil. individually we could be defeated by a united enemy but if we unite also, we have a chance. You sound naive about the wind and which way it's blowing. The Communist world is forming an alliance with the Islamic kingdom to defeat us. That is your New World Order, it doesn't include freedom, so America is in the way. dismantle!
@0815funkmaster Do you know why Islam requires world wide blood shed? Because is you study the Qur'an and Hadith you would know that in order for the Madhi to return, (Islamic version of a 'savior') there must be world wide bloodshed on a massive scale. Nukes are the easiest way to do this. Stop being ignorant of the world and it's cultures and learn something, read something and quit listening to those who claim to be your best educators (propaganda spreaders) wake up dude.
@0815funkmaster Read about Charles the Hammers in 732 stopping the Qur'an order for world conversion across Europe, where muslims slaughtered all who opposed and looted, until they were stopped near Germany by this man. Later came the crusades as a result. This is a thousand + year old war for them. Freedom is not allowed under Islam, that is why we are targeted.
@0815funkmaster I know it's inconvenient for you and I and our economy, but it's kinda like saying when someone is about to kill us, 'well I don't wanna waste any more bullets, they are expensive' and then we get shot. Not exactly a wise move. They want our economy to fail also, which is why we need to be careful on spending. now Obama just blocked 20,000 jobs for the oil pipeline (oil independance) ?? wft,
There is no radical Islam, there is just Islam, anyone who feels differently has failed to read the Koran. The cult, Islam, must be smashed aside. They have caused more damage then Hitler ever had. I'm sorry everyone has forgotten the genocide committed against the Armenians, and other groups. I'm sorry people have forgotten the rampant killing sprees, rape and taking prisoners as slaves. I'm sorry that I will not forget 9/11.
Ron paul be weak with the military.
raider762 2 weeks ago
@raider762
Uh huh....Ron Paul "be" weak with the military. Right.
Sort of like, you know, the fact that, in Q4 2011, he got TWICE as much donations from active duty military, than ALL of the other candidates combined, including Barak Obama?? And then he got SIX TIMES more than any other Republican candidate??
Oh yeah...he "be" weak with the military all right!
~Chris
Norfolk, VA
sharkhearted1 2 weeks ago
For the Record: I am a Paul supporter... but the fact that people like you are makes it hard for sensible people like myself to admit it publicly... All of us aren't idiotic hypocritical racist super Christians... just a thought.
TheCmdrApollo 2 weeks ago
@TheCmdrApollo
Actually...to your your words..."just a thought"....you need to turn the mirror back on yourself and look at who is being the prejudiced one here.
And you call yourself a Ron Paul supporter?? Really?? Your bigoted response here is exactly the opposite of what the good doctor believes and practices so maybe you are mistakenly talking about somebody else.
~Chris
Norfolk, VA
sharkhearted1 2 weeks ago
@eyewarnedyou Yeah, for someone who is supposedly anti-communist, one would have thought he would be pro free market.
ElAsaltaCulos2 2 weeks ago
"illuminati" is Hollywood movie faux politics
and people who didn't get the movie use this term without knowing what they're saying.
sonbarably 3 weeks ago
@sonbarably hate to break it to you but the term illuminati has been around a lot longer then Hollywood. As to what it is now I can't say but it was a real organization at one time at least. And many would argue it continues today.
ThomasJeffersonMan 2 weeks ago
this is a mossad CIA operative
jesus was a thin man because He was committed to poverty - anti wage labor and its slavery.
"God will provide"
sonbarably 3 weeks ago
What is the Illuminati?
azbpro 4 weeks ago
Sickofcommies Do you get paid to spread shit all over the comments by the zionist owners of the USA or do you have any thing intelligent to debate?
Canadiangangstar 1 month ago
Ron Paul wouldn't end war, just turn it into Blackwater XE
carlmark80 1 month ago
you guys are fanatics. "well dr paul says what he wants in front of an audience (knowing he can never win) so therefore he won't be corrupted by the "bankers" or "lobbyists" or whatever special interest group.
LambChowder1 1 month ago
Great video I do not know why republicans do not even consider ron Paul I want him to be our president. I honestly have not cared in years who gets elected but this time I am behind ron Paul 100%.
ladylove8675 1 month ago 2
Ron Paul is my hero. He is a modern day Thomas Jefferson. Reagan was controlled later by the elite
Girls4RonPaul 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul seeks to cut ALL foreign aid, including Israel. That's a good idea. Israel should not seek aid from a Christian Nation, Judism judges Jesus Christ to be a false Messiah and a curse. They vehemently oppose any type of conversion efforts especially from Evangelicals. So the idea of a Christian nation such as the U.S. giving Israel aid is probably the biggest behind the scenes joke in Israel.
I say the Jewish people throughout the world should supply foreign aid to Israel. Not the U.S.
ClearChannelNews 1 month ago
@eyewarnedyou Fuck you and fuck your cult. Ron Paul is a Soros puppet just like Obama.
sickofcommies 1 month ago
Ron Paul sucks David Duke balls. If I wanted a KKK muslim for president I would vote for Obama.
sickofcommies 1 month ago
Ron Paul is a stinky KKK Nazicrat Communist anus.
sickofcommies 1 month ago
@sickofcommies Actually, Ron Paul is a free market capitalist. He is the opposite of a communist. He subscribes to the Austrian school of economics, which are pretty much as free market as you can be.
ElAsaltaCulos2 1 month ago
@ElAsaltaCulos2 All of that means NOTHING when he is a cultural Marxist and has a pro-jihad foreign policy.
sickofcommies 1 month ago
@sickofcommies Cultural marxist? What are you smoking? and his foreign policy is capitalistic. He wants free trade. That does not make it "pro Jihad". "Pro Jihad" is going to the middle east and bombing them and putting embargoes on middle eastern countries.
ElAsaltaCulos2 1 month ago
Comment removed
sickofcommies 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ElAsaltaCulos2 Pro-Marxist and pro-jihadist is blaming the USA and Israel for Islamo-Nazism.Now back to your gay marriage and heroin and mosques at ground zero, Ron Paul stuff.
sickofcommies 1 month ago
@sickofcommies Try to prove it
MosinManiac76254 1 month ago
I am voting for Ron Paul! 2012 is the year of Ron Paul! Bring it!
RonPaulKicksAss 2 months ago
Israel can support itself, it's a first world country, time for the americans to help their own. It's not like Israel is alone anyway she has a lot of friends not just the americans.
kit2ng219 2 months ago
@HeartOnMySleeve77 it's quite simple. Its not the fact that Ron Paul doesn't support Israel, he respects their sovereignty as a nation that is well off enough to set their own agenda. Like others have said, the United States gives money to Israel while also giving money to the very people that hate them. What sense does that make? He wants to allow Israel to be Israel... without overbearing influence of the United States government.
bladitybla 2 months ago 2
John Henson much?
boogerbro1999 2 months ago
@HeartOnMySleeve77 Ron Paul would stop sending aid to the countries surrounding Israel, which would be a net GAIN for them since we currently send 6x as much money to Israel's neighbors as we send to Israel. Furthermore, he would return Israel's sovereignty. For Ron Paul's support of Israel, back when Israel took out a nuclear reactor in Iran, Ron Paul was one of only 4 congressmen who voted against formally denouncing Israel's actions because he said they have the right to defend themselves.
bpitas 2 months ago
SO, my only concern is hearing that Ron Paul doesn't support Israel. Can anyone refute or substantiate that?
HeartOnMySleeve77 2 months ago
@HeartOnMySleeve77 "Doesn't support Israel" is a little extreme and is the use of political rhetoric. His concerns are that we give Israel 3 billion dollars in foreign aid every year and give the surrounding nations that want Israel obliterated 6 billion dollars each year. He wants to cut off foreign aid completely, because when Israel is taking money from us they are subjected to our authority. Paul wants to make Israel sovereign and let them decide for themselves without having to please us.
RyanOkonski 2 months ago
@HeartOnMySleeve77 Hmmm. Doesn't support Israel? Is he supposed to? Where is that written? Do you mean the state of Israel carved out of land stolen from the Palestinians just like the British stole land from the Irish & subjugated the entire island of Ireland? That? Ron Paul would behave as he always has--in accord w/his oath to support the Constitution. Do you support that? Cuz if you do, you must support the cessation of all foreign aid, including that which goes illegally to Israel.
restoresoundmoney 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HeartOnMySleeve77
Israel can support itself, it's a first world country, time for the americans to help their own. It's not like Israel is alone anyway she has a lot of friends not just the Americans.
greets from Canada (^^,)
kit2ng219 2 months ago
Wait...abolish the Justice Department and the CIA? Why not Homeland Security?
MyTotalRemedy 2 months ago in playlist More videos from illuminatitv
This has been flagged as spam show
We can’t just support Ron Paul on YouTube…
**YOU MUST MAKE PHONE CALLS**
RON PAUL DESPERATELY NEEDS MORE PHONE BANKERS IF HE IS GOING TO WIN
MOST VOTERS DON’T WATCH YOUTUBE. THEREFORE WE MUST REACH OUT BY PHONE
*YOU* CAN MAKE PHONE CALLS AT: PHONE[dot]RONPAUL2012[dot]COM
COPY AND PASTE THIS ON EVERY VIDEO
THUMBS UP IF YOU AGREE
northwestborn 2 months ago
I love how the media pundits say Ron Paul is not supported by the Tea Party. In fact on a recent show Rush Limbaugh laughed hysterically when a caller claimed the Tea Party would rally behind Paul. Rush went on to say that there was no way this would happen and even mentioned that it wasn't Paul who started the Tea Party. Of course anyone with a brain in their head knows Rush is full of it.
mainmedic 2 months ago
conservativesnetwork . com/2011/12/07/ron-paul-is-a-lying-scumbag-politician-with-borderline-sociopath-tendencies/
TruthSayer2 2 months ago
Kudos to Blue Republicans who don't tow your party line and can think past a gang-herd mentality and register Republican for a year to vote Ron Paul 2012 in your state primaries.
Gluntion 2 months ago
Mishanne, thank God Almighty I don't have to register Republican in California. I can just stay as I am, and vote for what's right just as I am. : ) Kudos to you Republicans who are voting on integrity, honesty, and logic, and principle, and not caving to Neo-Con fascist perversion of the conservative platform. Ron Paul is your only TRUE CONSERVATIVE. I've read up on some of the original Republican platform. IT"S NOT WHAT THE NEW REPUBLICAN "CONSERVATISM" IS ALL ABOUT TODAY!
Gluntion 2 months ago
@Gluntion your democrat party is corrupt as well sir, even more than the republican corruption, they all are. THa'ts why i am a registered independent.
SupremeAmerican 2 months ago
Themunz126...beautiful, opened for debate. I would say if you and others like you would wake up to our Nation's CIA covert operations of installing dictators and propping up puppet regimes, (if our overbloated ferderal government would change the, "enemy of my enemy is my friend" flawed foreign policies) and stop creating situation around the entire world that cause BLOW-BACK, then Ron Paul would be a "yes starter" for you, and whether you like it or not, he is the most credible candidate.
Gluntion 2 months ago
Well done. But I don't think he actually served in Vietnam. He was a Air Force flight surgeon in the Vietnam era, but I think he served else where, if I'm not mistaken.
Gluntion 2 months ago
If Ron Paul would wake up on his view of Islam he would be more credible. Until that time he is a no starter for me.
themunz126 2 months ago
Another independent voting for Ron, conservatives may not be on board with him 100% but he is your only candidate with any real appeal beyond the base, if it's "ABO" then you better pick Paul.
motter28218 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul was not invited to the Republican Jewish Coalition conference in Washington this week (yet he supports Israel's independence, I.e. by voting to let Israel bomb supposed Iraqi nuclear facilities). Strange, or... perhaps Israel enjoy their big-blood-buddy-U.S-OF-Israel to leech-off for their blood-spilling.
To U.S. 'patriots'... does your 14-trillion debt amounting to over 80-trillion in future payments and growing making you feel a little anaemic at all?
Ron Paul 2012 - last chance!
NZDuriahheap 2 months ago
If you're voting for Ron Paul, make sure you are registered as REPUBLICAN, otherwise you won't be able to. I was listed as "not declared" and I had to change it to Republican so I can vote for this amazing guy. DO IT!
MishanneLove 2 months ago 2
I'm a conservative who would have disowned my party and all of American politics by now were it not for a chance to vote for Ron Paul.
reaganismyhomeboy 2 months ago 10
This is an info war folks! Make Videos, Share other Videos, Talk to new people every day!
904PinballZine 2 months ago 4
I'm a recovering republican, conservative to the core, extremist Christian, and I'm voting for Ron Paul.
DiJohnny18 2 months ago 3
I'm an independent and I am voting for Ron Paul.
Boredpersons55 2 months ago 3
You got it! You absolutely nailed it! After eating the journalist who had the show prior to her, CNN's Candy Crowly put up some bogus poll showing that Ron Paul would have only 4% of the independent vote if he won the GOP nomination. Those were completely bogus numbers. Your assessment is correct: nobody gets more independent votes than Ron Paul. That includes Obama.
fsujag54 2 months ago 5
He's not actually cutting welfare yet.
sga86 2 months ago
comparing Ron Paul to Reagan is almost an insult to Ron Paul. Not even Jefferson was as principled and consistent as Paul is.
ElAsaltaCulos2 2 months ago 15
@ElAsaltaCulos2
I think you're taking your worship of Ron Paul just a bit too far dude. Seriously???
sakonhagakure 1 month ago
@sakonhagakure I don't worship the man. If sold out his values and flip flopped on issues, he'd lose my support. But he has a long consistent record of standing up for what he thinks is right.
Reagan talked the talk, but didn't really walk the walk. Jefferson also tried to violate laws that he himself put into place once he became president.
ElAsaltaCulos2 1 month ago
@ElAsaltaCulos2
and the same can be said about Ron Paul. Especially when it comes to earmarks. He said on cavuto in the same breath that he votes against all earmarks and then he says every penny should be earmarked. He games the system by loading up bills he knows are going to pass and votes against them so he can keep saying I didn't vote for that. (which he practically might as well have) He constantly pander's to the 9-11 truth movement but says those aren't his views.
sakonhagakure 1 month ago
@sakonhagakure Ok, bud, so tell me, if I am forced to pay for Social Security even though I am against it, should I refrain from collecting SS once I am eligible for it? Of course. His constituents are forced to pay money to the federal government, so he is trying to get money back. There is nothing hypocritical about that. Now, on the other hand, if they weren't forced to, and he was taking money from the federal government, that would be different.
ElAsaltaCulos2 1 month ago
@sakonhagakure He votes against the bills because he knows where he stands, what is so wrong with that? Because most of congress doesn't give a shit does not mean he should be like them.
And he doesn't pander to the truthers, but he is not going to push them away. Why should he push away people who support his message? He is different, so the media marginalizes him, so why he should push people away?
ElAsaltaCulos2 1 month ago
@ElAsaltaCulos2
If he didn't pander to truthers then he wouldn't be a constant guest on Alex Jones' radio show. There's a video somewhere when he was confronted by a truther and his simple answer was he couldn't handle the controversy and had too much on his plate with the fed and whatnot.The best way to handle people like that is just like Howard Dean did in 04 and cut them off at the knees. Sometimes you have to tell some people don't support me.(like Don Black for instance.)
sakonhagakure 1 month ago
@ElAsaltaCulos2
Personally I like Ron Paul but alot of Ron Paul supporters on the internet treat this man just as much as a messiah as the Obama supporters treated Barack during the 08 election.I like him but in a general election against Obama all these progressives that are supporting him now are going to go back to the other side and if you think people are playing the race card on him now just imagine what the obama administration will do to him because of those newsletters.
sakonhagakure 1 month ago
@sakonhagakure S what? so he should just give up? If it comes to mudslinging, it is easy to point out broken promises and corruption by Obama. Besides, those newsletters have been debunked.
ElAsaltaCulos2 1 month ago
@ElAsaltaCulos2
A more precise comparison of Ron Paul to any past president would be to that of George Washington.
Washington proclaimed the U.S. neutral in the wars raging in Europe after 1793. He avoided war with Great Britain and guaranteed a decade of peace and profitable trade by securing the Jay Treaty.
Washington's Farewell Address was an influential primer on republican virtue and a warning against partisanship, sectionalism, and involvement in foreign wars.
originaLkomatoast 1 month ago 2
@ElAsaltaCulos2 lmao nice irony
LambChowder1 1 month ago
@ElAsaltaCulos2 was he principled when he took pork money for texas
LambChowder1 1 month ago
@LambChowder1 So because he doesn't agree with something, he should not look out for the best interest of his constituents? So if you are against say..... Social Security, but you are FORCED to pay into it, should you not at least try to get some of it back? If his constituents were exempt from sending money to DC, then I would call him a hypocrite.
ElAsaltaCulos2 2 weeks ago
You're seriously comparing a man who's entire outlook on life is that morality shouldn't get in the way of self interest with the president who recognized that America's responsibility to fight evil was of paramount importance? I think you need to think about this.
koyunbaba73 2 months ago
@koyunbaba73 You mean the Nobel peace prize winning president who never closed gitmo; who just ended the Iraq war when Bush had scheduled it to end; who extended the Patriot Act; Who started another war and is bombing several more countries on top of that; who supported bailing out companies with public funds; Who just signed into law the NDAA; The man who had a 14-year old American killed? That guy? the man who took a 4 million dollar vacation while the country is broke?
ElAsaltaCulos2 1 month ago
Great Video man Love it. Ron Paul 2012 !!!!
Nieuws1 2 months ago 3
I really like this video but I wish someone would make one like this explaining how Dr. Paul would phase out spending and not burn down everything all at once like some ppl fear.
im4stlh 2 months ago 3
Paul didn't serve in Viet Name, he wad drafted in the Cuban Conflict...either way he had my vote!
ACMEphotography 2 months ago
Gotta be Ron Paul and ONLY Ron Paul!
BlazinBillUSN 2 months ago
Ron Paul will be a shock to the current system. That is why the mainstream media will not give him the time he needs to explain his position. Drastic situations call for drastic measures. We need a real change.
Pondview126 2 months ago
I have a feeling there'll be a For the Record video about Ron Paul's Constitutional and rational foreign policies. lol!
streetcrazykenny 3 months ago
Ronald Reagan may be a name you hold up as an example of a good president, but he started this spending spree och he said deficits dont matter. What makes Ron Paul so much superior to Reagan is the fact that he understand austrian economics unlike Reagan who was a beliver in the chicago school. The later belived in active monetary policies from the FED
Hanksand 3 months ago
3:50- "Ron Paul is Ronald Reagan"
No need for insults now!
Tr3xKuro 3 months ago
@Tr3xKuro Yeah, Ron Paul actually KNOWS economics, and not just the devil's advocate economics, but Hayekian Economics. Paul also knows foreign affairs far more than Reagan could've ever dreamed of. If anything, Reagan tried to be like Paul and failed.
streetcrazykenny 3 months ago
@streetcrazykenny Ron Paul knows economics, but he has unfortunately subscribed entirely to a model that does not work well with compromise. He may be running for president, but the president can't force all the legislation he wants. He's going to have to learn to compromise. If I had a venn diagram of all the economic issues that he and the rest of the republican congressmen saw eye-to-eye on... and only those things were put into a bill... the american people would be fucked.
samisyosam 3 months ago
@samisyosam Understandable. But you're not taking into account that a President Paul would be completely different leader than former presidents. He's not going to get into bed with Congress, nor is he going to beg them. He'll go to Congress and compromise on smaller issues, and persuade on bigger issues. As a speaker, he can get the American people to go to their legislators.
streetcrazykenny 3 months ago 28
@streetcrazykenny I think you're giving him the kind of messianic treatment that people gave Obama in 2008. The president can sit there and veto things, but he can't force legislators to vote the way he wants, even within his own party. Everyone in congress is corrupt as hell. They vote along lobby lines. The only thing that Ron Paul can do, aside from veto everything under the sun, is pass the few line-item things that he and the GOP agree with. And those things are dangerous.
samisyosam 2 months ago
@samisyosam What I think is you havnt paid attention to the republican movement at all hence your fear that he would not influence much at all. Bush Republicans for their time where not fiscal conservativves and looked towards government to spend and social engineer The United States. Republicans however since the Tea Party was formed in support of Ron Paul immediately changed the message. If Ron Paul said to audit the FED so did GOP if RP said this or that was unconstitutional so did the GOP.
iggsta3o5 2 months ago
@samisyosam Ron Paul may not be what every GOP member sees as Ideal but because of Bushs failure. A lack of trust in the old Bush GOP establishment, and Ron Pauls support from the Tea Party He has changed the message of Republican considerably, not on every topic but considerably. The Tea Party was so influential that GOP nominees changed their tune consistantly in an attempt to hijack some of its influence. Ron Paul has had much sway and influence in the GOP and will do so come election day
iggsta3o5 2 months ago
@streetcrazykenny idiotic statement. People like you stop progress from happening. Please know the man more. Sit with him, then tell me this crap.I'd trust him with my life, and I do. Please wake up. its like 1970 to you and your regurgitating Robert Downney Jr. words. Ket the women decide this one and go grab a beer. PLEASE
Girls4RonPaul 1 month ago
@Girls4RonPaul Say what? lol!
Ron Paul or bust, Ron Paul or war.
streetcrazykenny 1 month ago
Ron Paul's got a cult on his hands. Soooo many mindless followers
bricitybrac 3 months ago
@bricitybrac I don't know how to break this to you gently, so I won't. Ron Paul's core followers, the first 10%, are the more educated than the rest of America by an order of magnitude. We just so happen to understand economics. Once you have read, and understood economics, as Mises, Hayek, Hazlitt or even Schiff has explained it in their seminal works, you will be able to appreciate your former ignorance in it's true unvarnished nature. Until then you are clearly what you derisively dismiss.
derek2010x 2 months ago
@bricitybrac I don't know how to break this to you gently, so I won't. Ron Paul's core followers, the first 10%, are more educated than the rest of America by an order of magnitude. We just so happen to really understand economics. Once you have read, and understood economics, as Mises, Hayek, Hazlitt or even Schiff has explained it in their seminal works, you will be able to appreciate your former ignorance in it's true unvarnished nature. Until then you are clearly what you derisively dismiss
derek2010x 2 months ago
Reagan.Again? Scary. Air controllers strike? Savings & loan? We need another Reagan like we need another corrupt brain dead President. And I voted twice for him, donated money & time to the GOP.
foucault1020 3 months ago
Very well done. Thanks.
foucault1020 3 months ago
Foreign policies suck, but I'd take that over gang-rich or mittens any day.
Nationofhonor 3 months ago
@Nationofhonor and what sucks about his stance of foreign policy?
thefish103 3 months ago
FOR THE RECORD.. da da da......
MsBigBeat 3 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
But can he fly?
I'm kidding...the fact is the media has demonized him ...perhaps because the corporations that controls them are happy making billions from the bailouts and the military industry? ...and well....people go by the lies they are fed (and bred) so they are misinformed and they repeat "their" false opinion. We have a man offering freedom & liberty...the others offer bondage, debt & socialism...many "Americans" will choose socialism. It's sad but it's true. Are you a man or a mouse?
mrsparex 3 months ago 3
@mrsparex Great comment. Mirrors my sentiments exactly. Benjamin Franklin once said, "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Every time I hear some fearful neoconservative claim we need to give up our liberties in order to stop terrorism, I think to myself 'you coward!'. I would rather die due to a terrorist's bomb going off near me, than give up my liberty or my freedom.
derek2010x 2 months ago 2
@derek2010x
Life without risk is boring.
That coming from an ex-adrenaline junky that rode his motorcycle 120+ MPH on the rear wheel in the '70's.
My memories scare me today. :)
originaLkomatoast 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Money bomb on December 16th, please spread the word and donate if you can :)
SoSpeakEasy 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul or No One!
transferpoint2012 3 months ago
I just love this gig.
I watch it over and over...lol
Uriel1816 3 months ago 30
@Uriel1816 funny, seen ur comment on my third viewing :) RON PAUL 2012!!
thumbbody 2 months ago
@thumbbody ..lol you bet. this is spot on!...Ron Paul 2012!
Uriel1816 2 months ago
Excellent!!
1family4me 3 months ago
Ron Paul is ok but I like Mitt Romney better. Romney will secure our borders and turn off the magnets that draw illegal aliens here. Ron Paul will help illegal aliens by preventing the police from arrested them on drug charges. Romney all the way.
Armornone 3 months ago
@Armornone whos Romney ?
molimhvalaizvoli 3 months ago
@molimhvalaizvoli He's the white Obama impersonator. Just what we need...not!
emorganschuster62 3 months ago
@emorganschuster62 I know :) the question was a rethoric one
molimhvalaizvoli 3 months ago
@Armornone Nah, Romney is all talk, typical politician, the one guy who has a proven track record of fighting liberal policy is Newt Gingrich. He will fight harder to defeat Obama than Ron Paul or Mitt Romney will. He is a solid conservative and can surgically dissect Obama in a debate better than any other of the candidates.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@weseyedwalk Newt Gingrich talks the talk but he does not walk the walk. Newt wife just found out that she had cancer at the hospital and then asked her for a divorce that very same day. Newt also is weak on illegal immigration and has a of other problems as well. Romney has a proven track record despite being behind enemy lines in Massachusetts. Its like when you have liberal teacher so you are afraid to say anything conservative. Well Romney was in Massachusetts and is still conservative.
Armornone 3 months ago
@Armornone 1:25 to disprove any illusions that Mitt Romney is consistent on anything but Pandering and Selling out. /watch?v=uPSf6KPaeXo&feature=feedu
YaHuWaHservant 3 months ago in playlist More videos from illuminatitv
@Armornone Nah, Newt is a fighter, he is the only one is the debates pointing out the truth about the liberal mediator and their designer questions that serve as a turkey shoot, while Romney is over there kissing ass, like a girl, why? I can't respect that. Look Romney is better than Obama sure, but New isn't weak on anything, he is unapologetic and a fighter. Romney has a track record of flip flopping, socialized medicine? I can't respect that, he is the standard politician dude.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@weseyedwalk Newt Gingrich supported TARP, Torture, the current Foreign Policy, wants government to interfere in the market place, and that he would like to pass his "variation" of Obamacare.
Newt is simply the latest bandwagon candidate that people like because of the words he is saying now not the actions he has taken. Obama talked about hope and change; his actions were different. Ron Paul is the only honest candidate who will do what he says. Let's try honesty.
YaHuWaHservant 3 months ago
@YaHuWaHservant Newt Gingrich supported TARP, Torture, the current Foreign Policy, wants government to interfere in the market place, and that he would like to pass his "variation" of Obamacare. The only one I believe is torture, and I am all for it also, fuck, everybody who thinks pouring a cup of water on someone it torture,, high school gym class was tougher, are you serious, we water board our own soldiers for practice, how can it be torture. Do you have evidence of the rest?
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
Comment removed
YaHuWaHservant 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@weseyedwalk
About Newt Gingrich: /watch?v=jWPz1Qdq1uI
How water is torture: /watch?v=Dj4uWXxGxQk&feature
YaHuWaHservant 3 months ago
@weseyedwalk Newt appeared with Nancy Pelosi to come out in favor of Global warming. /watch?v=qi6n_-wB154.
I think you need to get your facts straight. Romney never supported socialized medicine? Where do you get these lies? He will stop Obamacare in day 1 in office! What else do you want. He enabled local police to arrest illegal aliens in Massachusetts. Newt has a D- on the issue of illegal aliens and hang out with a lot of liberals. Newt is not the person you think he is. Stand with Mitt!
Armornone 3 months ago
@Armornone Romney set up socialized medical care in Massachusetts, dude everybody knows this, that's one of the biggest bones everybody has to pick with Romney. As far as Newt in the video you showed me, sure climate change is real, nobody disputes that, and nobody disputes we should be prepared, what we dispute is that it is caused solely by humans. Look if it comes down to Mitt Romney vs. Obama, sure I will be voting for Mitt Romney, but why doesn't he fight harder like Newt?
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@Armornone At the same time is it ends up being Newt Vs Obama, I hope you vote for Newt, he is way better than Obama, no doubt about that.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@Armornone I see Newt talking more shit about liberal than any other candidate and he wants to secure the border and enforce the law. He wants to stop letting just anyone in our country.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@weseyedwalk He supported the " dream" act which gives instate tuition for illegal aliens. He also appeared witih Nancy Pelosi for a global warming commercial. Newt talks out of both sides of his face and has a D- with numbersusa which is an anti-illegal immigration website which I donate money to. Newt talks the talk but does not walk the walk. He also divorced his wife and make her sign the papers on her death bed in the hospital. He has had 3 wives and is a jerk. No thank you to Newt.
Armornone 3 months ago
@Armornone yeah, He did not divorce his wife the day she got cancer, that's a twist, he was at odds with a long time and planning to divorce her long before she got cancer, and the global warming commercial which I saw doesn't mention man made global warming, only global warming, ok so what, I only contest man made global warming. Would you rather have Obama again? Ron Paul is a nut job, Herman Cain is losing too much to salvage, the rest are either more of a compromise or off the map
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@weseyedwalk Romney is clearly the smartest and most articulate debater on the stage. He is a brilliant man and fits all the major criteria. He wants to secure the border( Which Newt, Perry, Paul, Huntsman) don't. He wants lower taxes, he is tough on terrorist,etc... What more do you want? No one is perfect but you choose the best guy you can. You have deal with the candidates on stage to beat Obama. Romney is the guy Obama is most scared of for a reason. The guy is good and conservative.
Armornone 3 months ago
@Armornone Well Romney thought it was ok to set up socialized medical care in MA, no thanks Romney, and Newt Gingrich is a better orator and debater and a tougher fighter than Mitt, I'll give you this, Mitt would be better than Obama, but not the best, that is why Mitt Romney is polling third now and New Gingrich is first, Newt won't put up with bullshit, he will lock down the border, stop China from Screwing us, get jobs back and cut spending. I believe him over Romney, sorry.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@Armornone But if it comes down to Romney vs Obama of course I will vote for Mitt Romney, at least Mitt Romney sees himself as an American. Not like the piece of shit in the white house mutherfucker. If Romney wins I will back him up, but I disagree that he is the best choice.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@Armornone I will say one more thing, i respect you for backing up your boy Romney, at least you are not defending Obama, damn I can't stand those people. I still respect people like you that recognize the disaster that is Obama. peace.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@Armornone interesting. I have just gained a little respect for Newt.
Climate change is real, and we need to curb emissions quickly
HeavyMetalCanuck 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalCanuck YOu a liberal?
Armornone 3 months ago
@Armornone that word seems loaded, and to be honest I'm not 100% sure of its definition.
But I believe in: democracy, human rights, liberty and science
I think it is foolish to be too idealistic. Ultra-capitalism, and communism are foolish. As are tiny-government, or nanny-states.
HeavyMetalCanuck 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalCanuck Let me ask it a different way. Do you want you keep your money or give it all to the government and have them decide what you need?
Armornone 3 months ago
@Armornone If those are my only two options I would keep my money.
Given the option, I would prefer a system where I give only a portion of my money to the government so that they can spend it on roads, school, healthcare etc.
HeavyMetalCanuck 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalCanuck Well that is pretty much what most local state governments do. The federal government is suppose to protect us with military, secure border, capture terrorist. However, it has gotten out of control and the country will be screwed unless we can get spending under control. Look, dude, just vote for Romney ok. Newt is a jackass bastard. Actually, vote for anyone except Newt or Huntsman.
Armornone 3 months ago
@Armornone I'm actually Canadian haha. But if I were an American to vote republican... hmmmm... It probably would be for either Ron Paul or Romney. I like Paul's libertarianism (legalize weed) and his idea to get out of foreign countries and focus on defense from home. But he gets a little extreme on other areas that I don't like. Romney seems a moderate and fairly reasonable dude.
HeavyMetalCanuck 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalCanuck Why don't you worry about Canadian political system? Why are you looking at an election for a place you don't live or have the ability to vote for. Seems like a waste of time.
Armornone 3 months ago
@Armornone I know its weird. Canadian politics is much more boring. And America has lots of influence over our country, so your election does have some effect on us.
HeavyMetalCanuck 3 months ago
paul is extreme in that he is the only one that feels more state is not the answer.
surrealnumber 3 months ago
Ummm Molotov The Tea Party don't like Ron Paul. The Tea Party recognizes he is a nut and endorses CAIN and Bachmann.
Paul will never be President. He is TOO Extreme.
red5llaw 3 months ago
Ronald Reagan wasn't naive about Islam and terrorism and the plot against Israil and the U.S., Ron Paul is. Reagan was a true conservative, when he was elected he didn't mess around, he threatened to bomb if our citizens weren't released from the muslim terrorists. The Americans were released right away.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
Great to see you're not "conditioned" to think "that" way, whatever that means (if only I had a dollar for every time I heard Paul supporter utter that phrase!). All the sound effects, quick editing and such can't hide the fact you're behind a reactionary, racist, misogynistic old asshole. He will never be president, get that in your head already.
luvzgb 3 months ago
Ron Paul doesn't seem like a strong leader that enemies would fear. He seems like a feeble old man. I love some of his ideas, but I would be scared to death to have him at the helm in a war.
hiitsmescott 3 months ago
if you don´t understand free market economics (austrian economics), some of Ron Paul ideas sound crazy and absurd. the constitution limited the federal goverment to only few things (less than 20).
migu9999 3 months ago
@migu9999 they sound just "crazy" to you because YOU have been conditioned to think that way.....as you said, if you do NOT understand something, go and make an effort to gain understanding ! Ron Paul is ON THE MONEY !
0815funkmaster 3 months ago
Well lets just see if FreeMason Ron Paul will ACT on his views rather than just hold em like 'controlled opposition' must to convince us on the dialectic front...who knows... God does...(o0) GBY
CRISwraith 3 months ago
The republicans don't like Ron Paul because THEY ARE IN BED WITH THE SAME SCUMBAGS THAT THE DEMOCRAPS ARE! "
LucifersLapdog 3 months ago
WELL DONE! LET'S HAVE REVENGE ON ALL THE LIARS AND THIEVES IN OUR GOVERNMENT, BIG BANKERS AND CORPORATE MOBSTERS! RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT! AND I'M TALKIN' TWO TERMS! yeeeeee-hawwww!
LucifersLapdog 3 months ago
I don't support Ron Paul for 1 reason, his isolationists views, when asked what he would do with a nuclear armed Iran. Paul answered "I'd be friends with them". This seems a bit naive and dangerous to me.
intrepidorator 3 months ago
@intrepidorator EXACTLY!!! For all the good that Ron Paul demonstrates, his ideas about the rest of the world are naive at best. If I didn't believe that having Ron Paul as president would lead to the bloodiest war in human history, I might be more supportive. People nowadays have no perspective--having always lived in peace and safety.
qworegoys 3 months ago
@intrepidorator we seem to have no problem with Pakistan, India, Israel, the Korea's, Japan, China, Russia, South Africa having nukes. If you support the right to bear arms why can't the Persians use that right aswell??
kubaniski 3 months ago 2
Comment removed
intrepidorator 3 months ago
@kubaniski Your list of countries with nuclear weapons is incorrect, To correct this error I will list the countries with nuclear weapons. 1. America 2. Russia 3. United Kingdom 4. France 5. China 6. India 7. Pakistan 8. North Korea and 9. Isreal.I do not support any other nations "right" to possess bombs capable of destroying cities.I oppose Iran having nukes because they will use the on Isreal the first chance they get. Nukes are a deterrent for the USA they are a tool for the iranians.
intrepidorator 3 months ago
@kubaniski Because they have publicly declared their intention of destroying Israel and the U.S., it's kinda like saying why can't a known criminal bear arms even though he's a convicted felon.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@weseyedwalk How is THAT our problem ?! I thought I live in America !
0815funkmaster 3 months ago
@0815funkmaster I said the U.S, also. did you read my comment? They have publicly declared the U.S. a target.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@weseyedwalk Oh please....do you REALLY believe Iran is gona attack anybody? Come man ! grow up ! stop falling for the corporate media war propaganda ! The REAL enemy is NOT "over there" it is OVER HERE. Hiding within Washington and our monetary system: The Private Bankers who own and control the PRIVATE Federal Reserve, the military industrial complex, the big insider cabals who keep robbing us blinds and keep pushing us to more and more useless imperial wars ! WAKE UP !!!
0815funkmaster 3 months ago
@0815funkmaster YOur partially right, we do have enemies in our government, but our government is right now a tug of war between those who are trying to stop them. But you need to study history, study the Qur'an look at all the world terrorism going on, look at the bombing that took place in Nigeria as a threat? Iran has nukes now, why?for fun?they have declared publicly they want U.S. destroyed and Israel, they don't play around, YOU need to WTFU man. Your propagandized not me
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@weseyedwalk In a tug of war ....LOL...A. this is NOT "our" Government ! It does not serve WE the people anymore, It serves globalist Bankers, Special interests, the plutocratic families and the insider Corporations. I really don't worry AT ALL about Iran...that is just some more war mongering to distract us and use as a smoke screen for their Globalist New World Order Agenda. I doubt Iran will invade us anytime soon. But the Bankers with their minions in Government surly did a great job !
0815funkmaster 3 months ago
@0815funkmaster Why should you worry about Iran?, they've only developed nuclear weapons in the shadows of lies while publicly declaring intention of the muslim kingdom to destroy the U.S. and Israel. China and Russia have threatened us if we attack Iran's nuclear plant. Iran has sent 100,000 missiles and rockets to Syria, Gaza, Jordan etc. for a retaliation attack if Israel bombs the Iranian nuclear weapons plant. "Nothing to see here, move on" left propaganda bullshit?, yes.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@0815funkmaster Iran + Russia + China could defeat us. That's real and coming.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@weseyedwalk And also, I really don't give a flying fart about Zionist Israel! Why do worry about them ? What did they have ever done for us then get is involved in their stupid Tribal wars. Let THEM worry and care about THEIR country and WE worry about ours....how is that ?!
0815funkmaster 3 months ago
@0815funkmaster Israel is our friend and we need friends these days and they need us, remember WW2? only because of the alleys were we able to stop evil. individually we could be defeated by a united enemy but if we unite also, we have a chance. You sound naive about the wind and which way it's blowing. The Communist world is forming an alliance with the Islamic kingdom to defeat us. That is your New World Order, it doesn't include freedom, so America is in the way. dismantle!
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@0815funkmaster Do you know why Islam requires world wide blood shed? Because is you study the Qur'an and Hadith you would know that in order for the Madhi to return, (Islamic version of a 'savior') there must be world wide bloodshed on a massive scale. Nukes are the easiest way to do this. Stop being ignorant of the world and it's cultures and learn something, read something and quit listening to those who claim to be your best educators (propaganda spreaders) wake up dude.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@0815funkmaster I have actually read the Qur'an and it's war verses, I can verify this. You haven't.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@0815funkmaster Read about Charles the Hammers in 732 stopping the Qur'an order for world conversion across Europe, where muslims slaughtered all who opposed and looted, until they were stopped near Germany by this man. Later came the crusades as a result. This is a thousand + year old war for them. Freedom is not allowed under Islam, that is why we are targeted.
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
@0815funkmaster I know it's inconvenient for you and I and our economy, but it's kinda like saying when someone is about to kill us, 'well I don't wanna waste any more bullets, they are expensive' and then we get shot. Not exactly a wise move. They want our economy to fail also, which is why we need to be careful on spending. now Obama just blocked 20,000 jobs for the oil pipeline (oil independance) ?? wft,
weseyedwalk 3 months ago
GREAT vid!
ResistDeception 3 months ago
you know that if we elect him and he turns out to be just another tax and spend liberal type we're going to get mad....
fignal 3 months ago
There is no radical Islam, there is just Islam, anyone who feels differently has failed to read the Koran. The cult, Islam, must be smashed aside. They have caused more damage then Hitler ever had. I'm sorry everyone has forgotten the genocide committed against the Armenians, and other groups. I'm sorry people have forgotten the rampant killing sprees, rape and taking prisoners as slaves. I'm sorry that I will not forget 9/11.
IceBlood888 3 months ago
I don't hate Paul but i don't trust him either. His comments regarding radical Islam are a gigantic turn off.