why do it then make the same pattern in all of those 4 more pictures..the odds is kinda small that it would copy the same pattern on all 5 images. it would be different every time. explain that
Wouldn't there be two lines continually running throughout all 5 photographs in different paths from each other if this is the case? No matter how hard anyone tries they can't wiggle and jiggle a camera exactly the same between each snapshot causing the exact same exposure 5 times in a row. We would have to see all 5 photographs to see if Your theory is correct. If the patterns do not match, You just may be right. If they do, then We are possibly looking at something else.
The only FACTS about the shuttle columbia tragedy is that We don't have enough of them to figure EXACTLY what happened!....Again, this is the only FACT We have.,Everything else is only someone's personal "theory". In either case, if People and their "theories" were so accurate why aren't they working at the F.B.I., C.I.A., D.O.D. or even as a Professor of scholarly Authority at an Ivy Leauge University in such fields where they claim that they KNOW what happened?... have a cure for cancer
If I claimed a Theory of having formulated a cure for cancer, and was a High School dropout, WHO would believe Me? The deafening laughter would reverberate back from the 4 corners of the universe with such a thunder that mountains would crumble to the sea.Yet, if the same declaration was made by a world renowned dual doctorate oncologist, then everyone is all ears, not even so much as a chuckle .So, for all theories people have, sorry but I need CREDENTIALS to accept Your "scientific" Theory...
The Shuttle Columbia, had a failure taking off, an small piece of foam came off loose about 500 m/h producing a hole of 3 to 5 inches in the left wing. When the shuttle returned the piece was generating heat for the ultrasonic speed, creating an explosion separating the left wing. In ultrasonic speed the shuttle was completed out of control rotating as a bullet, killing the astronauts probably before the shuttle disintegrate ripping apart and exploding. No UFO, NO LIGHTNING hit the shuttle.
Seems to be a well validated argument. I always assumed this to be an effect of an ionized trail befind the damaged spaceshuttle that made a conduction path for upper atmospheric charges. But your argument has been well put, thanks.
The stars are described as “crisp background field of stars” = not camera shake.
"A precise time may be mapped by matching the photo and the strange electrical signature to the crisp background field of stars."
The 4 other pictures by the same guy and setup are perfect with no 'wobble'
The power lines in the picture do not show wobble
The lightning is Purple
The trail is brighter because an electric discharge has joined the ionized path left by the shuttle.
LiquidHeatAz 11 months ago
why do it then make the same pattern in all of those 4 more pictures..the odds is kinda small that it would copy the same pattern on all 5 images. it would be different every time. explain that
redbunnyz 1 year ago
Wouldn't there be two lines continually running throughout all 5 photographs in different paths from each other if this is the case? No matter how hard anyone tries they can't wiggle and jiggle a camera exactly the same between each snapshot causing the exact same exposure 5 times in a row. We would have to see all 5 photographs to see if Your theory is correct. If the patterns do not match, You just may be right. If they do, then We are possibly looking at something else.
skrimps99 1 year ago
The only FACTS about the shuttle columbia tragedy is that We don't have enough of them to figure EXACTLY what happened!....Again, this is the only FACT We have.,Everything else is only someone's personal "theory". In either case, if People and their "theories" were so accurate why aren't they working at the F.B.I., C.I.A., D.O.D. or even as a Professor of scholarly Authority at an Ivy Leauge University in such fields where they claim that they KNOW what happened?... have a cure for cancer
skrimps99 1 year ago
If I claimed a Theory of having formulated a cure for cancer, and was a High School dropout, WHO would believe Me? The deafening laughter would reverberate back from the 4 corners of the universe with such a thunder that mountains would crumble to the sea.Yet, if the same declaration was made by a world renowned dual doctorate oncologist, then everyone is all ears, not even so much as a chuckle .So, for all theories people have, sorry but I need CREDENTIALS to accept Your "scientific" Theory...
skrimps99 1 year ago
Thank you for the explanation.
lyn869 1 year ago
very true...I don't think Columbia was on such a zig zag course and that any weapon as advanced would have missed it and had to follow it again !!
weirdpragmatic 1 year ago
The Shuttle Columbia, had a failure taking off, an small piece of foam came off loose about 500 m/h producing a hole of 3 to 5 inches in the left wing. When the shuttle returned the piece was generating heat for the ultrasonic speed, creating an explosion separating the left wing. In ultrasonic speed the shuttle was completed out of control rotating as a bullet, killing the astronauts probably before the shuttle disintegrate ripping apart and exploding. No UFO, NO LIGHTNING hit the shuttle.
agubaia 1 year ago
First impression of the anomalous light pattern already denotes the shaking issue on dark frames for regular photographers. Good arrangement..
ILKERKAFA 2 years ago
Seems to be a well validated argument. I always assumed this to be an effect of an ionized trail befind the damaged spaceshuttle that made a conduction path for upper atmospheric charges. But your argument has been well put, thanks.
K1w1scot 2 years ago
very good
tm8271 2 years ago
got it but this doesnt change my belief in things beyond our human perception
conegg80 2 years ago