We all have to live and die, so the truth about life and death concerns and applies to us all. True or false? Search "TRUTH CONTEST" in Google and click the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says to learn the Truth. Let's get serious and honest about the truth of life.
This is a very difficult, small object. Nice job of tracking and imaging! Thanks for sharing! Once again, Thierry shows what hist high resolution imaging techniques can do.
Good shoot: Can "something" that supose to be falling from the sky - burning and breaking into pieces to have a total light's symetric ? That could be a UFO.... One more BIG lie to us ! but I understand... The panic would seize Earth. Isn'i it ?
Um... how can you tell? It just looks like a very out of focus blob that changes. This is what I would expect from a low-power telescope, of course, but how does one know that this blob is the satellite? Without more context (background stars, reference points, etc) it seems that categorization mistakes would be likely.
@Kargoneth In order to obtain such images, the astronomer must know where to point and track. That sharply defines it to a very small patch of sky matching the orbit (known) of one particular satellite. Essentially, it can't be anything else. This is confirmed by comparing photos and drawings of the satellite before launch; It's easy to see the shapes.
I do not see any shapes; it is too low a resolution for me.
Since most known objects orbiting the earth have unique trajectories it is possible to watch the object's path and check its size, increasing one's confidence that the object they are looking at is the object they were attempting to find. It is still possible (but more unlikely the larger the object) that some random object would have a similar apparent trajectory and be mistaken for it.
I had figured that the known trajectories of objects were used for tracking objects (how else would we know where to point sensors to view the same object each night when we are blind to it during the day) but it was the visual incongruity that rubbed me the wrong way since I was unable to see anything other than ambiguous similarities between the video and the satellite (I have no background experience with such things; the images don't make any sort of intuitive sense to me).
This has been flagged as spam show
We all have to live and die, so the truth about life and death concerns and applies to us all. True or false? Search "TRUTH CONTEST" in Google and click the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says to learn the Truth. Let's get serious and honest about the truth of life.
77Listen 2 months ago
Is huble still in space?? aNyone????
INMATE2468 4 months ago
holy,, imagine recicle that rf transmitter for your home wifi extensor.. lol ww
takahashitoshiya 5 months ago
This Is So Embarrassing... Sorry i Should Have Cleaned the Mess Up O_o
SpanishThug 5 months ago
what did it hit?
janole3711 5 months ago
This is a very difficult, small object. Nice job of tracking and imaging! Thanks for sharing! Once again, Thierry shows what hist high resolution imaging techniques can do.
Telescopemaker 5 months ago
Good shoot: Can "something" that supose to be falling from the sky - burning and breaking into pieces to have a total light's symetric ? That could be a UFO.... One more BIG lie to us ! but I understand... The panic would seize Earth. Isn'i it ?
jely57 5 months ago
did i miss something?
timberswiss3 5 months ago
What artist/track is the background music?
bitstorm77 5 months ago
neu ma ve tinh do ma roi vao viet nam thi xay ra chuyen gi nhi?
duongtiendung1972 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Excuse me waiter, there's a satellite in my soup.
DuhEnlightenedOne 5 months ago
i everybody just would have access to such telescopes
aldoenricoferretti1 5 months ago
Um... how can you tell? It just looks like a very out of focus blob that changes. This is what I would expect from a low-power telescope, of course, but how does one know that this blob is the satellite? Without more context (background stars, reference points, etc) it seems that categorization mistakes would be likely.
Kargoneth 5 months ago
@Kargoneth In order to obtain such images, the astronomer must know where to point and track. That sharply defines it to a very small patch of sky matching the orbit (known) of one particular satellite. Essentially, it can't be anything else. This is confirmed by comparing photos and drawings of the satellite before launch; It's easy to see the shapes.
VideoFromSpace 5 months ago 7
Comment removed
Kargoneth 5 months ago
Comment removed
Kargoneth 5 months ago
Comment removed
Kargoneth 5 months ago
Comment removed
Kargoneth 5 months ago
Comment removed
Kargoneth 5 months ago
@VideoFromSpace For want of comment editing...
I do not see any shapes; it is too low a resolution for me.
Since most known objects orbiting the earth have unique trajectories it is possible to watch the object's path and check its size, increasing one's confidence that the object they are looking at is the object they were attempting to find. It is still possible (but more unlikely the larger the object) that some random object would have a similar apparent trajectory and be mistaken for it.
Kargoneth 5 months ago
Comment removed
Kargoneth 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VideoFromSpace
I had figured that the known trajectories of objects were used for tracking objects (how else would we know where to point sensors to view the same object each night when we are blind to it during the day) but it was the visual incongruity that rubbed me the wrong way since I was unable to see anything other than ambiguous similarities between the video and the satellite (I have no background experience with such things; the images don't make any sort of intuitive sense to me).
Kargoneth 5 months ago