Added: 4 years ago
From: vjcarl
Views: 51,622
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (98)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i love mustangs but i would take a chevelle over a mustang any day

  • F-found

    O-on

    R-road

    D-dead

  • @mutherfo When a ford model had the letters gl in it it meant good luck... Because youre driving a ford.

  • ford built the first V8 but chevy will always have the last laugh.

  • muscle cars are the shit. ricers cant touch them. every ricer driver always talks shit cuz they know their cars cant touch american power. they make cool car toys to smash tho!

  • yeeeeeeah and the guy with the chevelle goes home with the girls and the trophy! haha

  • You can't exactly call the Nova, Chevelle, Camaro, El Camino, and Monte Carlo all differnt cars....considering they all had the SAME ENGINE and 9 out of 10 parts are interchangeable. The camaros are shorter flatter chevelles. The chevelles are novas but more rounded. and El Camino's are chevelles with a truck bed. So let's relist the number of muscle cars GM made. Chevelle. Firebird. Trans Am. GTO. Now the Fords. Mustang. GT. Torino. Fairlane. Cougar. You can build a lego car a 100 ways. but it

  • Mustang > Chevelle

  • @suphollywood210 you got that backwards dude

  • go chevelles. not rice

  • mustang all the way!

  • ford got fucked up,hahaha!

  • wat wit the hatin on ford i got a 88 5.0 and when u hit the gas it just shakes but if u dont like it then just fuck off idc it works for me and wats wit ppl sayin ford dont got any fast cars thats retarded and noones said anything about the shelby gt500 that car was bad ass but i dont see how u can hate mustangs chevelles are nice but im just a ford guy and if u fight over the internet ur a fag that anit got a life so u pick fights with ppl u dont kno

  • @hudack1 The difference is Chevy didn't need someone like Carrol Shelby to make a fast car.  Chevy didn't go crying to NASCAR to force Ford to sell them engines so they could reverse engineer them like Ford did... The result of which was the 429. Chevy was never stupid enough to put the oil sump of a performance engine in the front like Ford was for decades. Now Ford did make some really cool cars, but Chevy ALWAYS made better engines.

  • ha stock chevelle,

    dad had a 72 chevelle with a 500 big block

  • Yep. Stang killer. Just like my '56 bel air

  • Good race. The Chevelle kicked ass as usual.

  • Chevy playing "follow me to the finish line" as usual...:-)

  • Why are you all fighting about fords and cheves when there are better things to fight about. Like ricers thinking that their 4 cylinder hondas are fast because they have fart cans on them. All American made muscle is sexy.

  • except an 86 mustang haha

  • my bros 87' mustang is a 4 cylander so its like a ricer exept crappier

  • Yeah, you're more likely to see a classic Chevelle or Mustang beating the crap out of a ricer on a handling competition than a ricer smoking one of the Musclers in the 1/4.

  • chevelle 1 mustangs 0

  • ium a ford guy and a 5.0 engin isnt gonna keep up with a modified chevelle. before u start pickin on ford race a chevelle ss and a mach 1 428cj

  • at least your honest about being a fag

  • the chevelle smoked that weak as ford. lol that was sweet

  • hey inktug. You obviously don't know shit. Don't come out and talk like you know shit when you don't dipshit. Gran torino, galaxie, Mustang, falcon. Oh, by the way, you forgot the corvette you fuckin' moron.

  • I'm a Chevy guy here to call you out. Ford made damn fine motors back in the day with the 351, 352, 390, 406, and especially their 427. THEN they screwed up and ditched everything but the crappy 281 that you see on the road today which still can't keep up with Chevy's LS1 competition that's 12 years old

  • 289*

  • im a ford guy and love mustangs,but for a mustang to race a chevelle (and from looks,the chevelle is modified) i just dont see a 5.0 stang winning even if its modified.and depending if the stang is carborated or EFI,the EFI 5.0 didn't make much power even with some bolt on's.

  • @AkLG5 It's nice to see a Ford guy with a brain. Ford DID make some good engines, but I'll never be able to get over the fact that they put the oil sump in the front. That was an INCREDIBLY stupid design flaw considering all of the oil goes to the back when you drop the hammer. The little 5/16 drive rod they used for the oil pump was always a weak link as well. You can still make a Ford run REALLY well, but it takes more work to do it than a Chevy does.

  • looks like that chevelle handed that stangs ass to it.

  • cool video. nice cars. i like old school cars so of course i'm a chevelle man. as long as its american these days i'm for it. just anti-rice burner

  • uh are yall forgeting that ford owns lincoln...and galixies (idk how its spelled) and thunder birds

  • @james420texas who cares. we're talkin about cars not boats!

  • yea but all ford needs is a mustang to beat them hahahaha

  • im a strait Chevy Guy! but sum1 has to put it simple! That Mustang is a Muscle Car Stupid!! a Modern Muscle Car!! Fuckin idiots!

  • well,ive only seen 1 fast mustang.its a real nice foxbody,badass.its also my uncles and nobody within 2 countys in all directions will race him heads up.but other than it,all the the fords ive raced...blew.they cost too much to build and they have bad head designs on top of half the head bolts as a chevy.its a pain in the ass to run anything over 10:1.unless u have an o-ring grove machined in ur heads.fords just cant keep up with a chevy.

  • what does that have to do with the smokin that............THAT ford just got

  • hell yea chevelles all the way!!!

  • thats a fuckn race, woooo

  • Ok just look at 1960-1977 how many gm muscle cars were introduced? now how many fucking ford muscle cars?????? GM has always LEAD the muscle car genre..chevelle, nova, camaro, firebird, trans am, gto...the list goes on and on, now lets see what did ford have...mustang, torino gt, fairlane(which they sucked and were slow as balls), cougar notice a trend? all these gm muscle cars are infamous and widely loved, now how many ppl are like oh i would love to have a damn cougar or a friggin torino..

  • actually i would love to have an old cougar...but i do agree with you, GM did lead the muscle cars, but dodge/plymouth was a close second. superbee, daytona, cuda, dart, roadrunner, challenger, charger, ect.

  • Your right FUCK Mustang there no ford muscles!!!!!

  • Thats right. FUCK Pony cars!

  • Yeah and what do u drive, id be glad to put my little mustang up against your car, dont talk shit about ford because no matter what brand of car there is at least one fast car from that brand so anyone who just hates on brands is a complete retard, ive seen fast camaros, fast cobras, fast imports everyting so it doesnt really matter with the brand and if you have ever raced you would know that.

  • ok lets see what shld i kick ur ass with/ a '67 gto a '70 or an08 charger or hell with those '08 CHALLENGER ha ford can lick my nuts

  • AMEN TO THAT MY FRIEND, FUCK MUSTANGS, ITS ALL BOUT THE CHARGERS, CAMARO'S, CHALLENGERS AND CHEVELLES BABY. Don't forget the novas :D

  • Lets at least be fair here dude, last musclecar was produced in 72, I say 70, but general rule is before restrictive emmisions killed compression ratios. Im a chevy guy , but some fords kicked ASS, a LOT of the old Stangs rocked ass, 428 CJ, SCJ, Drag Packs, Torino 351 Clevelands, 428, 429, shaker hoods, Cougar eliminator, 351 C, or 428, Shelbys, And the Mopars were incredible. GM was 4 lines, Ford 1, and dont forget the GS Buicks rocked with the 455's, most overlooked car in 70

  • @temmer20 I would love to have a Torino. Cobra Jet if I could find one, it would look nice right next to my Mustangs and '71 Chevelle. I wouldn't mind owning a Fairlane either (66/67) and I agree about the cougar though. No thanks.

  • @temmer20 could be that GM was just trying to chase Fords coat tails also.

  • @temmer20 is still a lego car no matter what you call it. Chevelles, Novas, Montes, Elkys, Novas, theyre all made out of the same type of "legos" they're just different colors and shapes. Engine wise theyre one in the same. So actually know your cars before you start trash talking kiddo. And yeah, I own a mustang and a chevelle, next car i plan to get is a cougar. Why? Because I don't care what you drive, I promise it can easily know what the backside of an old cougar looks like.

  • i want a chevelle:)

  • my dad has a cougar gt with a 390, i want it because its fast as fuck. should be hatin ricers not other muscle cars.

  • jajaja nice! cougars are pretty cool, they make beautiful lowriders! I have a 1971 chevy c/10 pick up step side with a 350, but im trying to buy an s10 because my c/10 only gets 6 mpg!! i feel you tho on hatin ricers, my truck is only 3 speed and its smoked civics with 6 speed!! i still want a chevelle tho, and a charger!

  • Not to be a dick, but since when are new mustangs musclecars.... That Chevelle Rocked, I dusted a stanger a few months ago an the street, he was one surpised Mo fo, they all think they are race cars....

  • this is to puddin1001, ive had a chevy el camino ss 454 since 1970 and its sat in my garage for a few years. i have never had problems a engine block cracking or whatnot. the fact is chevy engines PRODUCE more power than Fords. If you look at all the cars ford has produced you can see that none of them compare to chevy's in any category. Chevy has and always will be the number 1 muscle car in America. people buy chevy's because they are known for power which Ford obviously isn't.

  • well said

  • guys, guys, guys who cares if ford or chevy is better you need to save your energy for the real enemies, the euro cars. we cant let them take over american streets with their cute and practical fuel efficient 4 cylinders, long live powerful thumping american made v-8's!!!!!!!

  • fo real

  • chevelle weighs ALOT more than that little escort looking car as well OLD SCHOOL BABY

  • Chevelles suck up Mustangs baby!

  • noooooooo......idiot chevelles have better engines and they have more horsepower and in the vid the chevelle owned

  • again...39 year old chevy beats up a late 80's furd..nuff said...Chevy is by far a better quality..someone should tell the ford engineers that oil is a lubricant not a fuel

  • put a 39 year old big block mustang against the chevelle with the same mods and then we can talk. a 302 against a chevy big block is no suprise who will win. And if Chevy is such a better quality then how come your new z06 is still getting spanked by the Ford GT? yea, you're right.. nuff said.

  • it should be getting "spanked"..

    for the price tag on the GT.. its a weenie car personally...for dorks with big checkbooks but small peckers...

  • Lol, you're funny. Think about it. Chevy has the new Corvette ZR-1 coming out this summer for 2009. Ford won't touch it! That's a true American car that can be used to smoke any car on the road and be used as a daily driver. I would like to see Ford try and compete because they won't. Nice try though. BOW DOWN TO CHEVY! True American made vehicles!

    - Mike --> Proud owner of a 1972 Chevelle.

  • Ford had problems designing heads. Look at camshafts for ford and chevy. The ford cam has more lift for a comparable chevy cam. Chevy makes more power with a smaller cam.Clevelands had 2 heads and neither one fit the pupose. Big blocks going into mustangs had to have different heads to fit between the shock towers.Rod to stroke ratio is wack on the fords too. Rods are short and creates alot if side thrust on cylinder walls. I'm not triing to hate but c'mon.

  • @tamapalagi That's my point exactly. Chevy engine designs have always been FAR superior to the comparable Ford designs. Build a few engines people, and you'll see what we mean. I've built Chevy's, Fords, Mopars, etc. Only Ford is dumb enough to put the crappy heads on the good bottom end (351W) and the good heads on the weaker bottom end (351C.) The 351W has bigger journals and longer rods than the 351C, and the early 351W blocks were MUCH beefier. How stupid is that?

  • puddin your a tard

  • ahh back to the glory days of Chevy vs Ford

  • chevy rules!!!!!!!!

  • ...Chevelle=Lengendary (its big block better beat a 302 w/ 2** hp) Mustang=Nothing has ever sold like it, ever! I love both of these cars but my only argument is that ford keeps up w/ a smaller motor every time even today! 5.0-5.7, 4.6-5.3, 5.4-7.0! This vid is why I think I'll get into hotrodding, Ford and Chevy come together in great harmony and evry1s happy!

  • god your all so stupid

  • I believe the 35+ year old chevy just beat up on that newer stang...nuff said. "its only just recently that Chevy could design a competetive/ powerful V8 thats also Reliable. Is this a joke? hellloo genius.. the small block chevy was introduced in 1955 and has been the #1 choice for hotrodders and muscle cars folks alike.. haven't you ever been to a car show? how many rods do you see with a small block ford? not too many. know why? expensive to build and don't make a ton of power..

  • yer, its no.1 for 1 reason.... its cheaper. its made from a softer alloy and although it is still hugley competetive and very powerfull, it cant hold a candle to the equivelant Ford V8 purly because it wont blow up. im also speaking from expereince have worked with chevy V8s in the past, their dog shit.

  • I would like to fight for Chevy, but I spun a rod bearing in my Chevelle a couple of months ago...I think that was my fault. 450 hp with stock rods. Oops...

  • are you saying chevy v8's are shit? if this is true I dought you even seen a sbc or a bbc. personally im a mopar guy but still go to the track and probley about 70% of the cars there are running chevys

  • look, im not douting that chevy V8s are underpowered or dont perform because they do. You can get alot of power out of them. But the FACT!!!!! is the reason 70%+ of kit cars and hot rods use chevys is cos their cheaper. The reason their cheaper is because Chevy use a cheaper alloy to make the block, this cheaper alloy is softer than the ford V8 and therefore is more prone to breaking.

    Its not my opinion its a FACT

  • well factory ford blocks can only handle 550 when factory chevy blocks can handle 650-700.if you knew anything about blocks you should know that chevy has a far better alloy than ford.chevys have nickle and lead in their alloys to make the block distribute loads better and make them less likly to crack.they are cheaper and make more power than a ford.plus a for only has half the head bolts as a chevy.that means i could run 12-13:1 and not blow head gaskests like you would at 10.5:1.

  • WTF. thats a load of crap. i may not be an expert on engines. but i have enough experience with blown engines to know that a top chevy V8 will blow long before a performance Ford V8. Im not douting their V8s can push alot of horse power, thats why their also popular with Drag Racing.

  • But its only in the last 2 years That Chevy came up with their own designed V8 that had the Endurance for NASCAR. before then all the V8s were based on the high performance FORD V8So dont go trying to tell me that their not only cheaper, but more reliable than Fords.

  • @puddin1001 Hmmm.. Wasn't it FORD who went drying to NASCAR back in the day? NASCAR forced Chevy to sell their 427 to Ford so Ford could reverse engineer it because Ford was getting their ass kicked. Ford promptly ruined the design be moving the oil pump to the front, reducing the number of head bolts, and doing all of the other retarded design changes Ford was famous for back in the day. At least Chevy can actually design their own engine without having to rip off another manufacturer!

  • OK wow, there are ALOT of dumb people on this site. Don't get me wrong, I'm a diehard Chevy fan, but that IS a load of bullsh*t. Ford's can run much higher compression than those numbers, and so can a Chevy. Take for example, Nelson's F.A.S.T. (Factory Appearing Stock Tire) BB Chevrolet Vette. 511ci, 'Factory' block & heads, 14.3:1 compression and runs 10.5's on bias-ply tires. 14.3:1. Nuff said

  • and to add on to that, I've raced my '71 Malibu 383 against 5.0l SN95's and Fox bodies, and I've won and lost. Mostly won, but a friend of mine runs a procharger setup on his fox body and he beats me by a couple lengths usually. In the 1/4. Also, I run w/o nitrous or any BS, and I hook good but those fox bodies always beat me off the line :-D

  • @puddin1001 Ever try revving ANY Ford big block as high as say a Chevy 427 can rev AND live? I've built both Chevys and Fords as well, and if you're going to call one junk, it would have to be the Ford. I've already mentioned some of Ford's idiotic design flaws, so I won't mention them again. If you really HAVE built both, you would know that a Chevy can take MUCH more abuse than a Ford can. It's really THAT simple.

  • the new chevy 08 vette will smoke anything on the street in its price range no other car dealer can compete with chevy. Ford swung and missed big on the new mustang 500 it was just the normal mustang will a little extra go. ford might have had some ok cars in the past but past is the past and present is now and now ford is a discrace.

  • haha, see you know im right. haha, typical chevy owner, all mouth no balls. it even shows in chevys pride and joy the "corvette" looks good sounds great but still well below average driving experience. haha

  • Well our pride and joy the CORVETTE will beat ur pride and joy FORD GT.....suck on that bitch.

  • chevy is the best ford sucks

  • fuck off, chevy are just cheap ass 2nd rate cars compared to fords. they care more about mass production and bigger profits than actually making a decent car that people love.

    even their engines cant hold a candle to the high performance FORD V8 and you no it

  • Fuck off? You first bitch. Acting like you know all this shit about Ford and Chevys yet you still in the fuckin 8th grade. Get a life asshole and you wont be so offended by peoples choices in vehicles. DAMN!

  • FUCK A FORD, Chevy is better by far, look at all the truck pull videos, chevy always pulls for, look at the stock ford vs chevy race vids, chevy always wins. Fors just sucks. Name one good thing for has......NOT A DAMN THING.

  • Hmmm ok then. lets look at NASCAR. the V8s used in NASCAR were Ford Designs. its only just recently that Chevy could design a competetive/ powerful V8 thats also Reliable. All their V8s are made out of a softer alloy, thats what makes them so cheap and readily available. Sure you can get alot of power out of them, but their still gona break long before a Ford V8.

  • listen fuckface just because you sit at home and play with your balls and stick a cucumber up your ass while u think about fords doesnt make them better than chevys go back and look at any comparison on ford and chevy and the chevy because its more reliable 4 cylinder thru v8 period

  • @puddin1001 You are a prime example as to why GM and Mopar guys ALL hate Ford guys. FACT: Chevy's 010/020 alloy is second to none. Fact: Chevy didn't need to make THREE different 350s to do the job because they got the design right the FIRST time. BTW, the reason Chevys are cheaper to build is because you don't have to replace EVERYTHING too get them to make power AND live. You CLEARLY have never built anything other than a Ford. If you had, you would know Fords are junk.

  • @kctransplant i couldnt agree anymore. well said!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more