Obama the illusionist pulls rabbits out of hats, only there's no rabbit and no hat.
Once I was a democrat til I realized there is no democracy with each party snorting cocaine cooperatively with rolled fiat trillion dollar bills taken from children's milk money and lifelong retirement investments.
Dems and rethugs share the same spittle and bleeding septums wrought through legalizing THEFT AND MURDER for their sweating trembling addictions to what belongs to us .
Of course Obama is a fony. He got elected. you cant get a elected nowadays unless youre a fucking crook. You can't even get a seat in the state senate let alone congress
First of all you would have to believe that Obama is not owned by the corporations. They all gave him big fat campaign contributions. What did the average union worker give Obama? A vote, big deal. Money speaks volumes,morales don't.. Then you would have to invent a Politician that had a morale code. LMAO
Just like the public option, dadt, and every other decision Obama has made, the little minds try to squirt out some gray matter to try to tear down the greatest president we've had in decades. But please, continue, it's funny watching children bang their heads against a wall in defeat.
In response to Mr President's executive order, they could transform the way they do business in the US, by simply doing business outside of the US, like so many already do, and which contributes to the long term unemployment in the US, Mr President... Sir.
This is pretty irrelevant. The recent union busting controversy is related to public state employees not private companies. What have public school teachers got to do with federal contractors?
Obama might not be as supportive of unions as we would like, but if the GOP wins all 3 branches of government, Obama haters will find life even tougher unless they are among the richest few. No social security for grandparents, no food stamps, nor Medicaid for disabled or poor families. no Head Start for little kids. Lower taxes? The GOP will not give you any tax breaks. Tax breaks are only for large corporations and the most wealthy. Too bad, you asked for it!
No surprise. Of course I will vote for Obama considering the alternative. Although Liberals will not vote GOP, there is a good chance that they will stay home. A challenge from the left will only siphon votes from Obama and ensure a Republican victory. Dennis Kucinich would have been my choice but unfortunately we Progressives never get what we want and lets face it we never will although we do have a few Progressive heros, like Dennis Kucinich and Bernie Sanders
Glenn Beck's news website, "The Blaze" featured this piece on their front page. It's titled "STEALTHY SOCIALISM: LIBERAL JOURNALIST EXPLAINS HOW OBAMA COULD DECREE FEDERAL CONTROL OVER PRIVATE CORPORATIONS TO UNIONIZE & REGULATE THEM USING LAWS ALREADY ON THE BOOKS"
Kind of ironic that people who want to work and don't want to join the union can't and the "pro-choice" (also known as baby killing liberals) are okay with you not having a choice. Yet, when it comes to murdering the unborn, they're all for it! No wonder why libs are so messed up. Liberals should be fucking aborted! ALL of them! What the fuck ever happened to CHOICE? You can choose only if you're a fucking idiot liberal? Fuck you morons!
Laws mean nothing without the will to enforce them. People who think that the passage of a law will automatically make things better are deluding themselves.
Unions represent a working man..they are falling becouse a working man is weak and naive........................it takes a revolution of a desperate working men to create strong union, not an executive order......................
Obama won't lift a finger to help the unions,that would upset the GOP and Coporate interests...the folks he wants to "triangulate" with.Obama is in for himself,the POTUS just represents his personal and financinal goals.He needs a primary challenge in the next election.Obama symbolizes the bland centralism that always comprises to the elites at the expensive of the rest of America.........
Because I know you realize the use of executive orders are an example of american dictatorship, and how the constitution was suspended. The "great" Lincoln suspended the constitution in 1861. Was it ever "un"-suspended after that date? What is clear is that there is not one chance in hell that an executive order could be sustained "under" a valid constitution.
I am perplexed. How stupid do people have to be to NOT understand the context under which an executive order could be put into effect
@slewofdamascus Exactly, I don't understand how people are complaining that Bush signed in X executive order only to be ok with it when they get something favorable. The executive orders were never intended to be used and abused in this manner and the current way presidents are using them are entirely unconstitutional.
Please somebody stop calling this uncle tom the pres. please...He's still a SLAVE working for WALL STREET and last I looked when I was there on Wally Street it's mostly run by a Bunch of Rich White Boys. All they did is suit up the boy and his house servant holding-er to his master in a couple of JC Penny garbs and send them onto the stage. Forget him doing anything guys his still a buck for the boys on wall street.
Please, The U.S. government elite are as anti- union as any nation in the planet. What would you call giving your people the “Freedom and Democracy “to compete for the lowest wages in the planet? The U.S. government elite have intentionally destroyed their own job market. The U.S. government, banking and corporate elite have exported every possible job in the nation. Obomber, just another global elite class warrior.
The point was explicitly made that the actions of Company X, who has decided to move their company's headquarters from Fremont, CA to Flint, MI, would make them ineligible to bid on a federal contract, in the name of "defending existing work laws".
How do folks rationalize nonsense, like that, to themselves?
40 seconds into his entire spiel, the point was explicitely made that there was no standard available to the federal government, to actually follow through on any efforts at enforcement, yet, somehow, President Obama and his administration are "not on the side of workers", for failing to defend a law that has no actual metrics to be defended with? Seriously?
Of course he could. Really now, people shouldn’t be surprised after he supported the banksters and continued the bush wars and even started his own, that he can no intention of helping any sheep. The sheep can baa as much as they want and continue to believe that he is not like bush.
@arscill1 Obama has extended the Bush Tax cuts. Torture under Obama has gotten worse in Gitmo. He has extended the Patriot act. THe legal sexual harrassment from the TSA is under his adminstration.
@captcrais101 you're like the GOP online trolls extending false rumors. Blaming him for what House GOP does. he didn't defend Bush Tax cuts; House GOP wouldn't extend tax cuts for middle class w/o. There are no reports of torture in Gitmo under Obama - NONE. Patriot Act was extended by house GOP, only after Obama/Dems chopped it up. And TSA crap comes from GOP-extended contract to the scanner machines.
@regroce WHy? Because I am critical of Obama? Stop thinking that democrats are good guys and republicans are bad guys. BOTH PARTIES ARE SELLOUTS!! BOTH OBAMA AND BUSH had banker lap dogs for treasury sec. Obama has a monsanto lapdog for the head of the agriculture. Both Obama and Bush are sold outy to the oil companies. Republicans and DEMOCRATS are owned by the SUPER RICH!! Only a few work for the people.
@captcrais101 For the exact same reasons I specified (unlike the generalities issued by you), that's why. You're blaming one guy for what hundreds of Repuglicans did. And because that one guy isn't a dictator who can change it all by snapping his fingers, you blame him alone. That's what the GOTeaParty wants you to do, too - ignore all the junk they did and then blame somebody else for it.
@regroce YOU BLUE DOG SHEEP!! I am not generalizing. I only blame blue dog democrats and Republicans. OBAMA IS A BLUE DOG DEMOCRAT!! Not a progressive. It is Obama's job to get us out of Iraq now and Afghistan. We are still in the middle east. One American Soldier in the middle east is one too many. Obama appointed Gienther,Vilsack and Salazar to the positions in the cabinet. Therefore he is responsible for them being corporate lapdogs which they are. He didn't hold BP accountable for the gulf
@regroce Next time read the voting records of the house and the senate. Take a look at Crews most corrupt dot org. That website has the names of the most corrupt senators and congressman. It lists both republicans and DEMCORATS!
@regroce People like you are the reason why I still have a crappy NAFTA Patriot Act and Iraq war supporting, Skull and Bones tool Senator still in office, John Kerry. A coward who let Bush steal the 2004 election by doing nothing about the theft. When Kerry went up for reelection, I worked like hell for his REAL progressive democrat primary challenger Ed O'Reily. He got 32% which is not bad.
@captcrais101 WAKE UP!!! WATCH OUT FOR REPUGLICAN WOLVES!!! They commit crimes, try to set up everybody else for the blame of those crimes, and then snicker away when sheeples fall all the junk their trolls pull.
@regroce I AM NOT A FOX IDIOT!! I AM A LIBERAL!! and Samarter than you apparently. I never said republicans are not crooks. Like any typical blue dog sheep. You defend democrats when they don't deserve defending. If the democrat was Dennis K or ALan Grayson, TRUE PROGRESSIVES. THen yes they deserve defending. But Democrats like Kent COnrad and even Obama are just as bad as the reoublicans. You are the one that needs to wake up out of the two party illusion.
@captcrais101 (i am not an animal! i am a human being!) Just look at your tirades here! And here's the facts: Obama never said he was liberal. I ain't defending him for that open status, either. and i'm not talking about two party junk. What I'm talking about is - you are holding one guy responsible for what the GOTea did. Which is what the GOTea Party is getting trolls to do. And under false claims, too. That's like me saying you are responsible for the tickets the last owner of your car got.
@regroce He is responsible in regards to his cabinet being corporate lapdogs since he choose them appointments. He is responsible for the wars. He has the excutive power as comander in chief to stop the wars and birng all troops home. Anything regarding how the excutive branch has now corporate soldout he is responsible for. As for the legastive Blue dog democrats and the rethugs are both responsible. This includes Pelousy, Hoyer, Harry wimp Ried, and Dick Durbin who supports cut soc security
If you want to vote for him fine but I can't do it again in good conscience. I can vote for my congressman Jim Mcgovern. I can vote democrat in the race to stop Scott Brown from winning a full term to the senate. But Obama no. NOT EVER AGAIN!
@regroce You are unable to hold this guys feet to the fire and are making excuses for this piece of dog shit that is the President just like every other piece of dogshit that has been President since Jackson
@mikeoli BS - what I am unable to do is read the false info posted by GOTea Trolls. Bush started wars with no legal basis -so they blame Obama. (like we can just retreat now?) GOP passes budget bill that kisses rich butts -so they blame Obama. Current TSA procedures enacted in congressional recess under Bush - they blame Obama. GOP congress extends Patriot - they blame Obama. Bush tortures prisoners -they blame Obama, who ordered stop on first day. commit the crime, blame the other is GOP plan
@regroce CHarlie Rangel was not set up. Mary Landerieu was not set up. I read her voting record which does not lie. SHE SUCKS CORPORATE ASS AS MUCH AS REPUBLICANS! Rep Melacon, and Jefferson are not setup. They are corrupt. CREW is never wrong. They say republicans like McConnell and Ensign are corrupt too.
@arscill1 I think that if you explore those issues, you'll see that what's happening is like what just happened with the revoking of the subsidies to the oil industry which Obama has pushed for. It became a very partisan affair with proof that the oil industry more or less bought votes to turn it down. Of course, it's Obama who's going to be accused for 'continuing' the subsidies. It's a corrupt world and I suggest you diverse your news reads to find out WHY and HOW things come to be.
@Devilock79 wow, dumbest thing ever put on this forum...he's not perfect, by all no shock, but to suggest bush is a saint compared anything is too much...
Oh, I guess you're one of those idiots who think Obama isn't a two-faced hypocrite who's broken every promise he made on the campaign trail. Guantanamo? Still open. Iraq? People still dying and troops still there. And now he's starting wars in Libya and trying to start in Syria. More drone strikes in Pakistan than when Bush was in control. But I guess you're one of those die-hard Democrat morons who will support a tyrant war criminal as long as he's a Democrat.
@Devilock79 haha,ur so moronic i dunno where to star; firstly,u used the phrase "i guess ur one of those" two times in the same fucking messages,that's really emblematic of ur how school-deprived u-just bad form- that's my tawdry point, im allowed one of those. now, about the merits of what u said,u r ridiculous...attributing lame positions to me, like an unwieldy adulation for obama, is just inane and a common tactic of someone's with nothing substantial to say. ur1st comment is still dumb.
@Devilock79 and, yes, his rabid detractors will always find something to capitalize on. u guys dont make any sense, u r sooo indignant when it comes to the stuff he does do, yet still try to use his sub-pars as leverage as indicative of his "apparent incompetence??" if he did shut it down, we'd be hearing u say, Guantanamo being shutdown has made us less safe...point: u r a shameless contrarian, get a life...im not a caricatured obama devotee or ideologue, as u would like&make ur life easier
@Devilock79 ur comment is rife with assumption and moot points.i personally (bc whoa,all us democrats aren't a uniform body- imagine that?)never had the staunch position of how it is imperative for Guantanamo to be shut down,so i cant criticize him too much for-tho i can hardly see his decision as egregious as starting the"program"of creating terrorists by unlawfully interning them as bush did. the whole"starting wars"leap is just risible,in ur perfect world,i wouldn't allow international strife
Obama is a corporatist. He stands for big business. Obama has never stood for the working man and his policies and past voting record prove this. His campaign was heavily financed by Wall Street. Both the Democratic and Republican parties (and the Tea Party) are completely controlled by corporations. Corporations fund their campaigns and they expect favorable legislation in return. There is hardly even one person in Washington D.C. who will stand for the poor and the middle class. Obama sucks.
@burnindownthehouse That would be the Wall Street now under criminal investigation? That would the present struggle to stop the public to subsidise oil companies? Maybe a tiny tiny fraction of the truth is that he's a perfectly decent bloke violently opposed by an opposition fuelled further by people more interesting in republican BS party lines rather than to think for themselves. And no... I'm not a 'sheeple'. I'm a non-american that very recently have become impressed by your president.
The problem here is that most congressmen and senators are bought by government contractors. If those contractors lose their contracts, then these senators and congressmen will impeach his ass.
Hey, who do you think Obama’s working for? The same vultures both parties work for--the biggest banks and the wealthiest members of the corpratacracy tied-up with them--CFR, baby. They all sit next to each other at the same meetings; the only difference is the Dems pay American labor lip service while the Reps are at least honest in screwing everyone but themselves (and screwing poorer Republicans--probably the saddest people on the planet).
he wont do anything he is like all the presidents before him all talk. look at what he is doing with the Sick going after sick people who use marijuana is states that already have it legalized he lied to the people when he said he would lay off on them states now in the last 6 weeks he has been sending letters and busting people. that are sick he lied to get in im sorry i voted for him. as got Bin laden its cool we got him but this dose not change my mind he lied to the sick.
@wtf0804 His buddies are not the unions. If they were, he would have signed an executive order abolishing all government contracts to non union shops on day one.
@hopaloop US politics reminds me of a quote I once read about the Roman gladiatorial games, it went something like, "They let the plebs fool themselves as to their place in the society and their importance to it."
Don't expect anything from Obama to help the little people in American, big business all the way for him, not unless it carries potential for re-election that is it seems now.
@TheAsfaloth yeah but its not his fault, just as much has it wasnt the fault of any one president not to use it for labor rights...both big government and lil government work for special interests..its systemic, nothing to do with one man
Executive Orders can't necessarily fix these problems and make them go away. Its a bit more complicated than that because Congress has absolute authority to Overwrite Executive orders! If Congress gathers enough votes on the floors, it can overwrite ANY Executive Order!
@deeppurple28 such an executive order may make it harder to do so... However, since most politicians are owned by at least one contractor, then really, it probably won't be too hard to gang up on him.
Don't expect any help from O-BOMB-a...or a republCON, or ANYBODY ELSE from the Corporate War Party.
73849309378 9 months ago
Obama the illusionist pulls rabbits out of hats, only there's no rabbit and no hat.
Once I was a democrat til I realized there is no democracy with each party snorting cocaine cooperatively with rolled fiat trillion dollar bills taken from children's milk money and lifelong retirement investments.
Dems and rethugs share the same spittle and bleeding septums wrought through legalizing THEFT AND MURDER for their sweating trembling addictions to what belongs to us .
Me vote? Never again
deckchairs1 9 months ago
Of course Obama is a fony. He got elected. you cant get a elected nowadays unless youre a fucking crook. You can't even get a seat in the state senate let alone congress
NASTEfilms 9 months ago
Maybe Avaaz or another big petition group will pick this issue up
Inferno350 9 months ago
First of all you would have to believe that Obama is not owned by the corporations. They all gave him big fat campaign contributions. What did the average union worker give Obama? A vote, big deal. Money speaks volumes,morales don't.. Then you would have to invent a Politician that had a morale code. LMAO
cruiseplatoon 9 months ago
Obama is not for unions....period!
HughieGphiladelphia 9 months ago
Just like the public option, dadt, and every other decision Obama has made, the little minds try to squirt out some gray matter to try to tear down the greatest president we've had in decades. But please, continue, it's funny watching children bang their heads against a wall in defeat.
jjtb4v 9 months ago
In response to Mr President's executive order, they could transform the way they do business in the US, by simply doing business outside of the US, like so many already do, and which contributes to the long term unemployment in the US, Mr President... Sir.
charlessmyth 9 months ago
The RealNews promoting a dictatorship..
Sad.
truefictions 9 months ago
@truefictions lol....
restlys 9 months ago
This is pretty irrelevant. The recent union busting controversy is related to public state employees not private companies. What have public school teachers got to do with federal contractors?
Dayoman10 9 months ago
Obama might not be as supportive of unions as we would like, but if the GOP wins all 3 branches of government, Obama haters will find life even tougher unless they are among the richest few. No social security for grandparents, no food stamps, nor Medicaid for disabled or poor families. no Head Start for little kids. Lower taxes? The GOP will not give you any tax breaks. Tax breaks are only for large corporations and the most wealthy. Too bad, you asked for it!
patb1717 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No surprise. Of course I will vote for Obama considering the alternative. Although Liberals will not vote GOP, there is a good chance that they will stay home. A challenge from the left will only siphon votes from Obama and ensure a Republican victory. Dennis Kucinich would have been my choice but unfortunately we Progressives never get what we want and lets face it we never will although we do have a few Progressive heros, like Dennis Kucinich and Bernie Sanders
patb1717 9 months ago
Comment removed
patb1717 9 months ago
Glenn Beck's news website, "The Blaze" featured this piece on their front page. It's titled "STEALTHY SOCIALISM: LIBERAL JOURNALIST EXPLAINS HOW OBAMA COULD DECREE FEDERAL CONTROL OVER PRIVATE CORPORATIONS TO UNIONIZE & REGULATE THEM USING LAWS ALREADY ON THE BOOKS"
i lol'd
asphyxiafeeling 9 months ago
Yo. How is this news?
ZwolfZki 9 months ago
Kind of ironic that people who want to work and don't want to join the union can't and the "pro-choice" (also known as baby killing liberals) are okay with you not having a choice. Yet, when it comes to murdering the unborn, they're all for it! No wonder why libs are so messed up. Liberals should be fucking aborted! ALL of them! What the fuck ever happened to CHOICE? You can choose only if you're a fucking idiot liberal? Fuck you morons!
rjascott 9 months ago
Laws mean nothing without the will to enforce them. People who think that the passage of a law will automatically make things better are deluding themselves.
blackiron60 9 months ago
Unions represent a working man..they are falling becouse a working man is weak and naive........................it takes a revolution of a desperate working men to create strong union, not an executive order......................
videographerr 9 months ago 3
Obama won't lift a finger to help the unions,that would upset the GOP and Coporate interests...the folks he wants to "triangulate" with.Obama is in for himself,the POTUS just represents his personal and financinal goals.He needs a primary challenge in the next election.Obama symbolizes the bland centralism that always comprises to the elites at the expensive of the rest of America.........
vulrare 9 months ago
That's it! In next elections i'm voting for Ronald McDonald.
hodenriss 9 months ago
Could, but he won't. Our 2-party system is nothing but 2 special kinds of retards.
Atrocitas6 9 months ago
Because I know you realize the use of executive orders are an example of american dictatorship, and how the constitution was suspended. The "great" Lincoln suspended the constitution in 1861. Was it ever "un"-suspended after that date? What is clear is that there is not one chance in hell that an executive order could be sustained "under" a valid constitution.
I am perplexed. How stupid do people have to be to NOT understand the context under which an executive order could be put into effect
slewofdamascus 9 months ago
I meant to add shame on you for wanting to perpetuate the illegal use executive orders (there's your dictatorship).
slewofdamascus 9 months ago
Executive orders are unconstitutional and prove that the constitution was suspended.
slewofdamascus 9 months ago
@slewofdamascus Exactly, I don't understand how people are complaining that Bush signed in X executive order only to be ok with it when they get something favorable. The executive orders were never intended to be used and abused in this manner and the current way presidents are using them are entirely unconstitutional.
sirellyn 9 months ago
@TheVideosplease Bullshit.
mojosideburns 9 months ago
Please somebody stop calling this uncle tom the pres. please...He's still a SLAVE working for WALL STREET and last I looked when I was there on Wally Street it's mostly run by a Bunch of Rich White Boys. All they did is suit up the boy and his house servant holding-er to his master in a couple of JC Penny garbs and send them onto the stage. Forget him doing anything guys his still a buck for the boys on wall street.
BabylonsKing 9 months ago
Please, The U.S. government elite are as anti- union as any nation in the planet. What would you call giving your people the “Freedom and Democracy “to compete for the lowest wages in the planet? The U.S. government elite have intentionally destroyed their own job market. The U.S. government, banking and corporate elite have exported every possible job in the nation. Obomber, just another global elite class warrior.
workwillfreeyou 9 months ago
The Executive Order, is right next to his picket line "walking shoes" and, has the same chance of being used...
grendelcatt 9 months ago 4
The point was explicitly made that the actions of Company X, who has decided to move their company's headquarters from Fremont, CA to Flint, MI, would make them ineligible to bid on a federal contract, in the name of "defending existing work laws".
How do folks rationalize nonsense, like that, to themselves?
scipio2009 9 months ago
Absolutely hilarious.
40 seconds into his entire spiel, the point was explicitely made that there was no standard available to the federal government, to actually follow through on any efforts at enforcement, yet, somehow, President Obama and his administration are "not on the side of workers", for failing to defend a law that has no actual metrics to be defended with? Seriously?
People need to get over themselves.
scipio2009 9 months ago
Of course he could. Really now, people shouldn’t be surprised after he supported the banksters and continued the bush wars and even started his own, that he can no intention of helping any sheep. The sheep can baa as much as they want and continue to believe that he is not like bush.
iknownothingnow 9 months ago
@iknownothingnow
He's nothing like Bush, he's ten times worse. Bush was a saint compared to this bastard.
Devilock79 9 months ago
@Devilock79 What has he done that's worse than Bush?
arscill1 9 months ago
@arscill1 Obama has extended the Bush Tax cuts. Torture under Obama has gotten worse in Gitmo. He has extended the Patriot act. THe legal sexual harrassment from the TSA is under his adminstration.
captcrais101 9 months ago
@captcrais101 you're like the GOP online trolls extending false rumors. Blaming him for what House GOP does. he didn't defend Bush Tax cuts; House GOP wouldn't extend tax cuts for middle class w/o. There are no reports of torture in Gitmo under Obama - NONE. Patriot Act was extended by house GOP, only after Obama/Dems chopped it up. And TSA crap comes from GOP-extended contract to the scanner machines.
regroce 9 months ago
@regroce WHy? Because I am critical of Obama? Stop thinking that democrats are good guys and republicans are bad guys. BOTH PARTIES ARE SELLOUTS!! BOTH OBAMA AND BUSH had banker lap dogs for treasury sec. Obama has a monsanto lapdog for the head of the agriculture. Both Obama and Bush are sold outy to the oil companies. Republicans and DEMOCRATS are owned by the SUPER RICH!! Only a few work for the people.
captcrais101 9 months ago
@captcrais101 For the exact same reasons I specified (unlike the generalities issued by you), that's why. You're blaming one guy for what hundreds of Repuglicans did. And because that one guy isn't a dictator who can change it all by snapping his fingers, you blame him alone. That's what the GOTeaParty wants you to do, too - ignore all the junk they did and then blame somebody else for it.
regroce 9 months ago
@regroce YOU BLUE DOG SHEEP!! I am not generalizing. I only blame blue dog democrats and Republicans. OBAMA IS A BLUE DOG DEMOCRAT!! Not a progressive. It is Obama's job to get us out of Iraq now and Afghistan. We are still in the middle east. One American Soldier in the middle east is one too many. Obama appointed Gienther,Vilsack and Salazar to the positions in the cabinet. Therefore he is responsible for them being corporate lapdogs which they are. He didn't hold BP accountable for the gulf
captcrais101 9 months ago
@regroce Next time read the voting records of the house and the senate. Take a look at Crews most corrupt dot org. That website has the names of the most corrupt senators and congressman. It lists both republicans and DEMCORATS!
captcrais101 9 months ago
@regroce People like you are the reason why I still have a crappy NAFTA Patriot Act and Iraq war supporting, Skull and Bones tool Senator still in office, John Kerry. A coward who let Bush steal the 2004 election by doing nothing about the theft. When Kerry went up for reelection, I worked like hell for his REAL progressive democrat primary challenger Ed O'Reily. He got 32% which is not bad.
captcrais101 9 months ago
@regroce WAKE UP!!! BLUE DOG SHEEP!!
captcrais101 9 months ago
@captcrais101 WAKE UP!!! WATCH OUT FOR REPUGLICAN WOLVES!!! They commit crimes, try to set up everybody else for the blame of those crimes, and then snicker away when sheeples fall all the junk their trolls pull.
regroce 9 months ago
@regroce I AM NOT A FOX IDIOT!! I AM A LIBERAL!! and Samarter than you apparently. I never said republicans are not crooks. Like any typical blue dog sheep. You defend democrats when they don't deserve defending. If the democrat was Dennis K or ALan Grayson, TRUE PROGRESSIVES. THen yes they deserve defending. But Democrats like Kent COnrad and even Obama are just as bad as the reoublicans. You are the one that needs to wake up out of the two party illusion.
captcrais101 9 months ago
@captcrais101 (i am not an animal! i am a human being!) Just look at your tirades here! And here's the facts: Obama never said he was liberal. I ain't defending him for that open status, either. and i'm not talking about two party junk. What I'm talking about is - you are holding one guy responsible for what the GOTea did. Which is what the GOTea Party is getting trolls to do. And under false claims, too. That's like me saying you are responsible for the tickets the last owner of your car got.
regroce 9 months ago
@regroce He is responsible in regards to his cabinet being corporate lapdogs since he choose them appointments. He is responsible for the wars. He has the excutive power as comander in chief to stop the wars and birng all troops home. Anything regarding how the excutive branch has now corporate soldout he is responsible for. As for the legastive Blue dog democrats and the rethugs are both responsible. This includes Pelousy, Hoyer, Harry wimp Ried, and Dick Durbin who supports cut soc security
captcrais101 9 months ago
If you want to vote for him fine but I can't do it again in good conscience. I can vote for my congressman Jim Mcgovern. I can vote democrat in the race to stop Scott Brown from winning a full term to the senate. But Obama no. NOT EVER AGAIN!
captcrais101 9 months ago
@regroce You are unable to hold this guys feet to the fire and are making excuses for this piece of dog shit that is the President just like every other piece of dogshit that has been President since Jackson
mikeoli 9 months ago
@mikeoli BS - what I am unable to do is read the false info posted by GOTea Trolls. Bush started wars with no legal basis -so they blame Obama. (like we can just retreat now?) GOP passes budget bill that kisses rich butts -so they blame Obama. Current TSA procedures enacted in congressional recess under Bush - they blame Obama. GOP congress extends Patriot - they blame Obama. Bush tortures prisoners -they blame Obama, who ordered stop on first day. commit the crime, blame the other is GOP plan
regroce 9 months ago
@regroce CHarlie Rangel was not set up. Mary Landerieu was not set up. I read her voting record which does not lie. SHE SUCKS CORPORATE ASS AS MUCH AS REPUBLICANS! Rep Melacon, and Jefferson are not setup. They are corrupt. CREW is never wrong. They say republicans like McConnell and Ensign are corrupt too.
captcrais101 9 months ago
@regroce The PDCC (Progressive Democrats Campaign Committee) has decided to NOT help Obama get relected. wonder why? HE IS NOT PROGRESSIVE!!
captcrais101 9 months ago
@arscill1 I think that if you explore those issues, you'll see that what's happening is like what just happened with the revoking of the subsidies to the oil industry which Obama has pushed for. It became a very partisan affair with proof that the oil industry more or less bought votes to turn it down. Of course, it's Obama who's going to be accused for 'continuing' the subsidies. It's a corrupt world and I suggest you diverse your news reads to find out WHY and HOW things come to be.
arscill1 9 months ago
@Devilock79
......No.
Just no.
pazomblez 9 months ago
@pazomblez
Brilliant argument.
Devilock79 9 months ago
@Devilock79 wow, dumbest thing ever put on this forum...he's not perfect, by all no shock, but to suggest bush is a saint compared anything is too much...
carlo88moe 9 months ago
@carlo88moe
Oh, I guess you're one of those idiots who think Obama isn't a two-faced hypocrite who's broken every promise he made on the campaign trail. Guantanamo? Still open. Iraq? People still dying and troops still there. And now he's starting wars in Libya and trying to start in Syria. More drone strikes in Pakistan than when Bush was in control. But I guess you're one of those die-hard Democrat morons who will support a tyrant war criminal as long as he's a Democrat.
Devilock79 9 months ago
@Devilock79 haha,ur so moronic i dunno where to star; firstly,u used the phrase "i guess ur one of those" two times in the same fucking messages,that's really emblematic of ur how school-deprived u-just bad form- that's my tawdry point, im allowed one of those. now, about the merits of what u said,u r ridiculous...attributing lame positions to me, like an unwieldy adulation for obama, is just inane and a common tactic of someone's with nothing substantial to say. ur1st comment is still dumb.
carlo88moe 9 months ago
@Devilock79 and, yes, his rabid detractors will always find something to capitalize on. u guys dont make any sense, u r sooo indignant when it comes to the stuff he does do, yet still try to use his sub-pars as leverage as indicative of his "apparent incompetence??" if he did shut it down, we'd be hearing u say, Guantanamo being shutdown has made us less safe...point: u r a shameless contrarian, get a life...im not a caricatured obama devotee or ideologue, as u would like&make ur life easier
carlo88moe 9 months ago
@Devilock79 ur comment is rife with assumption and moot points.i personally (bc whoa,all us democrats aren't a uniform body- imagine that?)never had the staunch position of how it is imperative for Guantanamo to be shut down,so i cant criticize him too much for-tho i can hardly see his decision as egregious as starting the"program"of creating terrorists by unlawfully interning them as bush did. the whole"starting wars"leap is just risible,in ur perfect world,i wouldn't allow international strife
carlo88moe 9 months ago
@iknownothingnow You're not reading the news are you?
arscill1 9 months ago
there is always executive order. order this and that. the president has the power to kill any american citizen without putting him/her in court.
KhmerD0g 9 months ago
Obama is a corporatist. He stands for big business. Obama has never stood for the working man and his policies and past voting record prove this. His campaign was heavily financed by Wall Street. Both the Democratic and Republican parties (and the Tea Party) are completely controlled by corporations. Corporations fund their campaigns and they expect favorable legislation in return. There is hardly even one person in Washington D.C. who will stand for the poor and the middle class. Obama sucks.
burnindownthehouse 9 months ago
@burnindownthehouse That would be the Wall Street now under criminal investigation? That would the present struggle to stop the public to subsidise oil companies? Maybe a tiny tiny fraction of the truth is that he's a perfectly decent bloke violently opposed by an opposition fuelled further by people more interesting in republican BS party lines rather than to think for themselves. And no... I'm not a 'sheeple'. I'm a non-american that very recently have become impressed by your president.
arscill1 9 months ago
Laws of oppression. Only the small guy at the end of the line has to obey the law. This is despicable.
tubetib 9 months ago
why would Barrack Obama do that he's a republican lmao
Emil246 9 months ago
Yes we COULD!
Peas.
AceHoale 9 months ago
The problem here is that most congressmen and senators are bought by government contractors. If those contractors lose their contracts, then these senators and congressmen will impeach his ass.
dangerouslytalented 9 months ago
Yeah... Obama "could" do a lot of things, but it was "Yes we can." not "Yes I will."
Shisho2k 9 months ago
Hey, who do you think Obama’s working for? The same vultures both parties work for--the biggest banks and the wealthiest members of the corpratacracy tied-up with them--CFR, baby. They all sit next to each other at the same meetings; the only difference is the Dems pay American labor lip service while the Reps are at least honest in screwing everyone but themselves (and screwing poorer Republicans--probably the saddest people on the planet).
freddietz96 9 months ago
he wont do anything he is like all the presidents before him all talk. look at what he is doing with the Sick going after sick people who use marijuana is states that already have it legalized he lied to the people when he said he would lay off on them states now in the last 6 weeks he has been sending letters and busting people. that are sick he lied to get in im sorry i voted for him. as got Bin laden its cool we got him but this dose not change my mind he lied to the sick.
CazyDayz 9 months ago
Obama is a Union thug. He will help his buddy's out to get more vote's
wtf0804 9 months ago
@wtf0804 are you daft ? he has done nothing but lie to his base.
CazyDayz 9 months ago
@wtf0804 His buddies are not the unions. If they were, he would have signed an executive order abolishing all government contracts to non union shops on day one.
dangerouslytalented 9 months ago
FUCK O-BOMBER !
0xTRX007 9 months ago
Obama isn't on the side of the unions. he's on the side of the deregulated free market.
LouieArrighi 9 months ago
@LouieArrighi He says as much in the introduction to his book.
bulldogger 9 months ago
Obama is NOT on the side of the unions, he is owned body and soul by Wall Street and the banks.
colourmegone 9 months ago 44
@colourmegone just like the republicans
kainniak1 9 months ago
@kainniak1 Unfortunately, yes.
colourmegone 9 months ago
@colourmegone he's a part in a movie!! a psy-op.
hopaloop 9 months ago
@hopaloop US politics reminds me of a quote I once read about the Roman gladiatorial games, it went something like, "They let the plebs fool themselves as to their place in the society and their importance to it."
colourmegone 9 months ago
@colourmegone Excellent
mikeoli 9 months ago
Don't expect anything from Obama to help the little people in American, big business all the way for him, not unless it carries potential for re-election that is it seems now.
TheAsfaloth 9 months ago 18
@TheAsfaloth yeah but its not his fault, just as much has it wasnt the fault of any one president not to use it for labor rights...both big government and lil government work for special interests..its systemic, nothing to do with one man
carlo88moe 9 months ago
Executive Orders can't necessarily fix these problems and make them go away. Its a bit more complicated than that because Congress has absolute authority to Overwrite Executive orders! If Congress gathers enough votes on the floors, it can overwrite ANY Executive Order!
deeppurple28 9 months ago
@deeppurple28 such an executive order may make it harder to do so... However, since most politicians are owned by at least one contractor, then really, it probably won't be too hard to gang up on him.
dangerouslytalented 9 months ago