Lecture 8 | Quantum Entanglements, Part 3 (Stanford)

[grunder20]

A bit complicated to understand.

[agapitoflores001]

This video is very lengthy. I got a bit sleepy but you have a lot to learn in this.

[PurickRottweiler]

the part where he states that all particles / or galaxies...whatever..out side the sphere of two objects have no effect on the total force of attraction.....I do not see how that could be....draw another sphere(exactly the same) with the right most object of the left sphere being the left most object of the right sphere......which sphere has no influence....they both must influence the object....if only to cause a theoretical stalemate

[PLecN]

@PurickRottweiler He's using Gauss' law for gravitation - which is equivalent to Newton's law - although proof isn't a one-liner! In order be able to use it. he's assumimg that universe is infinite in space and matter density is same everywhere.

[gruff5]

i'm grateful to Stanford for providing these lectures. But they'd be doing everyone a favour if they correctly titled them as special relativity, as quantum mechanics makes no appearance in this Part 3 series whatsoever

[SpazzzDog]

What happened to quantum entanglements part 2???

[mrquantumking]

there is no link to download this lecture.

Can anyone help ?

thanks

[luzzie9]

These Part 3 sections of Quantum Entanglements form a great series in special relativity and electrodynamics. Strange labeling but a wonderful treatment of the Lorentz force.

[marianiiina]

i like his tshirt..............

[drdave616]

An extremely interesting Authority, on a difficult subject! Never seen the Guy at a loss for an answer!