@confusedmatthew I'm a little curious, after watching this film, did you read the graphic novel? The film for me was good, but like a Harry potter film, I couldn't help but think that the book was better.
i watched watchmen at a friends house for a bit and got bored shitless. but i borrowed the dvd a few weeks later after watching this review and now i loved it XD
You guys sound like comic book fans after they've first read Watchmen. It's refreshing to hear a review from people with no pre-knowledge of the book. It's also one of the failings of the movie. Fans hate when films deviate from the source material. Watchmen was one of the most faithful interpretations ever done and THAT is what drove the point home. That what works well in one medium, doesn't necessarily work in another. That's why screenplays differ from the source matter.
@SagaciousSilence I wish they would make it into a TV series too. They would be able to fit in all of the story and it would stay true to the graphic novel.
People who didnt like this movie were MOSTLY people who jumped on the bandwagon and read the comic after the trailer came out. You know, people weren't born in the 80's when it was released, but think they know more about Watchmen than everyone else. You know... fanboys. But overall it was a good movie. It was pretty much panel for panel. Malen Ackerman (however you spell it) was horrible.
@IstahilIB that's what happens when you put two brothers in the same place... At least if my understanding is correct, Confused Matthew And Stand In Stan are brothers.
my only prob with this movie is the main point that zach snyder tried to get across, didn't entirey engage me like the graphic novel did, they told the main story well, but the points that alan morre tried to get across was sort of a miss
I'm a TEENAGE GIRL, and I think this was one of the best movies ever made.
There were entire sequences taken pannel-for-pannel from the graphic novel, and everyone was cast perfectly, and the opening titles were art at its purest form.
If you haven't seen it, see it. If you've seen it, see it again. Trust me on this.
They made watchmen without the giant squid. I'll let you know thats low. In all honasty i agree with you in casting but the movie was a unintentional middle finger to alan moore.
Or maybe it's just not possible to tell this story in the same way in a different medium. A 2 hour movie is very different from a series of graphic novels.
Thanks a lot for your review Confused Matthew, especially because you pointed out that the movie is understandable even if you didn't read the comic. I saw the film without any idea of the comic and felt the script explained everything very well. To my disappointment there were a lot of people who stated the opposite, some even wrote that they didn't understand the story at all. Not to mention very dumb comments. Why is that especially men seem to have a problem with Dr. Manhattan's penis?
very entertaining film, a lot of thought-provoking ideas, awesome action and relatable characters. but i have to say that i was kinda bored whenever that blue guy with the mule-penis was on screen. he was a fascinating character, and the movie would have been worse-off without him, but i just wish he didnt have as much screen time. what he brought to the table was good, but his dialogue itself seemed kinda bland and contrived to me. otherwise a great movie.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
its so funny that this failure at life likes hates all the movies that most people like and he likes shitty movies. Watchmen wasnt really liked by most people and me.
I saw a preview of this movie, and was unsure about it, but later I started to get interested in seeing the movie. it has good music, and a dark realism to it I think. I bought the Complete Motion comic on dvd, instead. I did like the live action movie, but I like the comic better, but good review.
I didn't like this movie either. I felt the story was uninteresting. I also found myself bored. This was one of those rare films where people i respect said it was great, and i went into it optimistic. overall i was disappointed.
I can imagine Tesiftyexe going to his local cineplex, slapping down $8.50 (because he'll only pay matinee price), and demanding "give me my eight dollars and fifty cents worth of symbolism!" LOL. XD
I didn't like "Watchmen".I thought the characters were were both inane and insipid. The story hardly made any sense. Vietnam is defeated, and we have Dr. Manhattan to thank for that? Richard Nixon gets more than two terms, what? When did superheroes become unpaid shills for the state?
@globbo100 Dude, have you even read the comic book? It's a parallel world. Even reading the synopsis on databases, you can know that.
The story is complex and deals with time. The characters have their problems with humanity, and the theme is about human nature and the bad stuff you've done.
I respect your opinion, but you obviously saw a different movie then a lot of other people, including myself, did.
That's amazing. You say you respect my opinion, and then go out of your way to disrespect me personally by asserting that I watched an entirely different movie than everybody else did.I hope you don't talk this way to your friends and family.Let me be clear: I saw "Watchman" ,and my opinion is based on what I saw.I am not giving opinion on the comic book, because this is a movie review.I could care less about the comic book.
That's not disrespecting man, it's just stating that you hated the movie and I loved it. And if you don't wanna read the comic that's fine. But this film is set in an alternate world and you don't even have to read the graphic novel to understand it.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. And no, I don't speak like that to my family and I don't speak like that to anybody, I didn't even speak that way to YOU. Again, I respect your opinion, but that doesn't mean I agree.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I was bored through it most of the time waiting for something to happen. Most of the time it was thinking about the comedean. But I did like the guy with the funny mask. You know the guy who went to prison. "I'm not trapped in here with you, your trapped in here with me!" But what flips me off most is the way to prevent the nuclear war. Instead of wasting lots of cities, why not just nuke where the leaders are, can't go to war without leaders and top people. My plan kills less people. Beat that
Is this meant to be serious? Nuke the "top people"? Where the "Leaders are"?? First, aren't they usually in, hmmm, MAJOR CITIES? And secondly, will people just say "Stuff it, lets become a socialist paradise" or being a government will there be NEW LEADERS? Then again, maybe the above comment was just a troll.
If you take out the government the country will stop. We need the government for stability. That goes for other countries too. As for the socialist paradise, Russia is socialist and I don't see people say, "Let's be Russia, yea!" It will take time to recover sure but as for the crisis of destroying U.S.A and Russia, I think it would pass. After the cold war America won. We should win again.
I can't express this enough. You need to read the graphic novel. If you still haven't read it seriously do it. If you loved the movie then you'll love the novel.
omg this guy hates movies that suck, and a few ok ones (but watevs) but i cant believe of all the movies he hates, he likes the one i absoloutly hate. its like my enemy movie i just dont get how its good
We learn that the baddie who killed the guy at the start is the world's smartest man. They go to stop him but are too late and 10 cities are blown up. This stopped America and Russia gonig to war but saved billions are lives. How is that a bad thing? Sure everyone hater Dr Manhatten now but everyone did anyway after the conferance. The smart guy is killed and Dr Manhatten kills Rush-hack then goes back.
So the moral of the story is, saving lives is worse than murder.
It 's matter of prospective, people will disagree with you and say the ends do not justify the means. That is the point of both the movie and the book.
All I'm tryinbg to say in this is that all of the people the smart guy killed were already going to die, their fates were sealed. I'm not trying to be depressing or anything like that, but I'm just trying to say that in my opinion, millions is better than billions.
I'm just giving my honest opinions in this, saying things for reason, saying what I honestly think about films like Confused Matthew does.
Most fo this film is very pointless. Sometime in it we leant that the guy who died at the start was the father of latex-girl (what whet I'm going to call her). This ads nothing! I just gives us a problem with no solution! Dr Manhatten is finally convinced to come back to Earth. At so happens that the machine he was trying to build is finished so why do we need him after what he said?
Here's Dr Manhatten who is trying to make some kind of machine that will save America as they think Russians will nuke them. Dr Manhatten soon goes to a press conferance where he teleports himself to Mars after screaming a lot and saying that to him there's no differance between an alive person and a dead one. Already he has abandoned everyone to die. He's another good guy.
Next comes a scene in which two superheroes (one of which has no charactor and is just there to have the audiance look at her) talk. The first thing we hear about Rorshack (I can't be bothered learning his name) is in this: We learn that he threw an innocent person down an elevator sharf for basically no reason. Rorshack also, as is said in his "and I'll whisper no" speech says that he wants everyone to die. This is a goodie
To be blunt, I did not like this film. Okay, from the start: It opens with someone who I thought looked like some mob boss watching some yoga show or something to that affect. He then gets attacked in his apartment and this thrown out of a window. As he falls Rorschach (I had to look on wikipedia to find out how to spell his name) tells the world's worst joke. We piscover that the dead person was a superhero.
Alos, one small thing, the other heroes burnt down a building then saved all but one person. They later set fire to the sky which you can see the rist in. Hence I re-name Knight-own Knigth-arsonist,
This movie was obviously not for me the only person i liked was Rorschach. The rest just seemed kinda dull. I didnt think it was as great as everybody says it is.
hmmm you used to be funny. i was listening every shit u putted here before, haven't listen for about a year and i have no idea in which moment u become so boring. adding this other dude i felt like adding some cheap crap character in some dieing series
remember your lion king review which was fucking awesome
I completely agree that I could have watched this movie if it lasted 6 hours. People around me were bored, but I was fixed at everything that was happening. The implications of each character's backstory, ect.
oh BTW confusedmike... if you liked the movie... the comic book is 1000X's better. I defintely would recommend it, even to people who don't read comic books. Watchmen is a great work of literature.
One of the WORST movies I have ever seen.Allmost as bad as Batman and Robin.I feel like it was an excuse for the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.The plot and characters are both awfull
yes but isn't a movie based on a book or graphic novel to be different?My best friend saw the movie and read the graphic novel and told me they are allmost identical
The point to making an adaptation like a book is to open the world up to a new audience. A major character death isn't going to change in a translation. They also said that they were planning on keeping it close to the original novel although there was a lot of cosmetic changes. The characters and the plot was very similar to the novel and only went through few changes.
You're definitely entitled to your opinion, although I disagree with you... but do you sincerely think this is almost as bad as ...*cringe*...batman and robin. That movie should be erased from superhero cinema history. I just think the movie probably just isn't for you.
This is really odd that you've not read the BOOK (yes book not a comic), and yet you didn't feel lost, because most of the reviews of this film are saying the exact opposite, and I tend to agree. Not that I didn't like the film.
The comic is actually a character piece, like you were talking about. I mean, really, there are very few battles, cool powers, It's really about a bunch of people and their problems.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This was far from a fantastic movie, it was slow paced bore, with visual delights to make up for it. The only story that was even remotely well executed was Dr Manhatten's story, the rest of it was extremely tiresome to sit through. Lol It was the longest 3 hours of my life!
Sorry, but I am a big Spidey fan. I knew/know who Gwen Stacey is/becomes, and I know why the cathedral was chosen. Knowing that information still doesn't make Spider Man 3 any better. If anything knowing all that, and knowing what good stories can come out of the Spidey franchise makes the movie even WORSE.
Man, my friends had to drag me into this movie because I usually don't like superheroes but ... shit am I thankful that they did it! All the political background and the plot combined with badass action. How can you not love this!!!
I'm sorry Matt, but for once I'm gonna have to say I didn't like this movie. I mean it's better than most movies around, but I've read the book and the movie seems either empty or just too colourful and actiony compared to the awesome story of the book. The book was british, the film was american (difference of culture had a lot of effect)
What.................. The......................... Fuck................... This movie was fucking terrible what the hell? Maybe it's because the graphic novel is way better is the reason i hate the movie. This movie got so many things wrong that was in the book and the shit they added was so terrible. The sex scene was ridiculous the acting was terrible. The almost had Rorschach right till they fucked up his origin in the end.
the book or grahpic novel is always better for movies based on them. ecept perhaps twilight they should make the movie as differnt from the booka s possible becuase the book sucks
My only complaint about this movie is how long the intro "credits" take... That's a fantastic feeling when that's the ONLY bad thing you can say about a movie :D
It was a good flick, the only things that i found wrong with it was the annoying slow-mo fights, and the owl ship sex scene...oh yeah and the ending..other than that it was a fun movie.
I don't understand how anyone could like this bloated, self important piece of garbage. Blue penises don't bother me but just about everything else in this film does. No one should think of this as a film that sets a standard for anything. X-Men: The Last Stand and Spiderman 3 combined aren't as bad as this atrocious nightmare of a film.
What is it you doubt? Do you mean you disagree with me? Disagreeing and doubting are two completely different concepts but, no, Watchmen is far worse than Spiderman 3 because at least the latter had a sense of humor about itself whereas Watchmen is so busy telling itself it's the greatest thing ever it forgot about being in any way even remotely entertaining.
I doubt the validity of your opinion, and I disagree with you. But Watchmen is an awesome movie and don't say spiderman 3 knows how to make fun of itself because no movie should make a spoof of itself if its supposed to have a seriouse atmosphere and as for the self righteousness of watchmen Spiderman 3 was trying to keep 3 villains going at once and then try to bring them together at the end in what it thought was a clever ending.
What credentials qualify you to decide whether or not my opinion is any more or less valid than yours? Have any opinion you like but don't deny me mine.
Watchmen is neither awesome nor serious. It's incredibly awkward, unnecessarily violent, and coma-inducing. Spiderman 3 at least has the temerity to end around the two hour mark.
Watchmen is like a pretty girl who doesn't feel the need to exercise her brain: nice to look at but, ultimately, disposable and boring.
All I have is statistics. Most critics and fans of superhero movies far preffered watchmen and I wont deny your opinion I'll only defend one of my favourite films/books. Watchmen is serious. It has a serious point to get through about humanity and what it is and where its going. It wasn't overly violent there are far more violent films out there. If Spiderman 3 had gone over 2 hours it might have made better use of characters. Also you think a pretty girl is disposable? thats just weird..
Well, that's really your view of it, others love it, its a really great movie, you just have to turn off your brain and love it, its true to the novel and is just brilliant.
Well, I'm dissapointed in the movie because it was missing the Tentacled-monster, I haven't read the novel, but I've read about them, and it was definately better than the movie.
No, because it's just plain and simple a terrible movie.
The acting is horrible, the violence is completely gratuitous, stupid and adds nothing to the film, the action scenes are idiotic (might have worked in '300' but certainly not here), it's much too long, but at the same time feels rushed, the use of music was completely cheese-ball and arbitrary, and the production design was horrible.
I agree that Silk Spectre and Night Owl were underwhelming, but the people who played Rorschach, The Comedian, and Dr. Manhattan did great jobs. The Violence is gratuitious? What did you expect from an adaptation of Watchmen? Was the violence in 300 too "gratuitious" for you? I can't stand it when people think a film is too long. Aren't you at the movie to have a good time? Where do you have to go? The music was awesome, with small exception of 99 Luft Balloons. That was a bit weird.
The only one who was any good at all was Rorschach. Everyone else was either barely passable or just plain bad.
Yes, the violence was gratuitous. If you read the book, you'd see that it wasn't nearly as violent. They even changed entire scenes (the little girl kidnapping scene for one) just to make them more violent. And besides, it was just stupid and fake looking anyway.
I haven't read '300', but I assume the violence in that film was more appropriate since it was about a gory battle.
And just because you don't think a film can ever be too long (ha!) doesn't mean other people can't think that. This film was obviously much too long and too packed.
Terry Gilliam (who was originally slated to direct it) said that it probably only work as a miniseries, and based on this film, I agree with him.
As for the music - it was like they just took a "greatest hits" list from the 70s and 80s and slapped it on top of the story. It was a completely shallow and arbitrary use of music.
Hrm, wish you had read the comic. Not necessarily before seeing the movie, but would've been interesting if at least one of you had read the comic afterwards and you could comment on what you thought of the movie having read the original comic.
Watchmen is the only comic I've ever read, but I highly recommend it. It's better than the movie because the movie has to leave out so much. I'd say Watchmen is a comic book first - the movie is only a pretty decent approximation of it. Watchmen really is a work of art.
Dark knight returns is a sort of brother to Watchmen, the first two truely compeling stories. You should at least read Watchmen. It transends mear comics.
Take my advice; read the graphic novel. The movie is a great movie, but the graphic novel is a true masterpiece, with the story themes, the character interactions, and even the panel layouts all challenging the idea of what a graphic novel can be, and presenting an experience you can find something new in every time.
Oh, and for the record, there's no "The" in the title. It's just Watchmen.
Agreed. The movie really doesn't do the graphic novel justice, some of my favorite parts (most notably the Rorschach/Psychiatrist chapter) were missing or very abridged in the movie. I can't really fault the movie for that because if they included everything it would be like 5 hours long, but the graphic novel still is a better experience.
if you think this was good i suggest you read the graphic novel! :)
JLJJustLikeJulius 1 month ago
This movie was average imho. It wasn't my type of superhero movie anyway, so I give it 5.5/10.
TheWereCreaturesDen 3 months ago
@confusedmatthew I'm a little curious, after watching this film, did you read the graphic novel? The film for me was good, but like a Harry potter film, I couldn't help but think that the book was better.
KmorrisonNCC1701 3 months ago
i watched watchmen at a friends house for a bit and got bored shitless. but i borrowed the dvd a few weeks later after watching this review and now i loved it XD
SuperFabioff 4 months ago
You guys sound like comic book fans after they've first read Watchmen. It's refreshing to hear a review from people with no pre-knowledge of the book. It's also one of the failings of the movie. Fans hate when films deviate from the source material. Watchmen was one of the most faithful interpretations ever done and THAT is what drove the point home. That what works well in one medium, doesn't necessarily work in another. That's why screenplays differ from the source matter.
corbinmichael123 6 months ago
not that great. In fact I found it to be boring as all hell.
drewswift 7 months ago
I wished they would have made Watchmen into a tv series instead of into one movie. Matthew said he wished that the movie wouldn't end.
SagaciousSilence 10 months ago
@SagaciousSilence I wish they would make it into a TV series too. They would be able to fit in all of the story and it would stay true to the graphic novel.
MovieBoffin 6 months ago
read some books matthew
poontang3zizo 10 months ago
You have probably been corrected since this video was made, but the first season of "Heroes" rips this off a lot.
Rocketboy1313 10 months ago
who goes and watches movies for a YOUTUBE VIDEO GOD I HATE BOTH OF YOU
GIANTWARTITAN 11 months ago
People who didnt like this movie were MOSTLY people who jumped on the bandwagon and read the comic after the trailer came out. You know, people weren't born in the 80's when it was released, but think they know more about Watchmen than everyone else. You know... fanboys. But overall it was a good movie. It was pretty much panel for panel. Malen Ackerman (however you spell it) was horrible.
ccayco 1 year ago
You two sound sooooo alike.
IstahilIB 1 year ago
@IstahilIB that's what happens when you put two brothers in the same place... At least if my understanding is correct, Confused Matthew And Stand In Stan are brothers.
DemonicRemption 1 year ago
BEST MOVIE EVER!!!!! Great review!
TheDarkknightrules92 1 year ago
I'm just glad that Dr. Manhattan wore undies whenever he made himself Godzilla-sized . . .
Lonsoleil 1 year ago
my only prob with this movie is the main point that zach snyder tried to get across, didn't entirey engage me like the graphic novel did, they told the main story well, but the points that alan morre tried to get across was sort of a miss
superhuman295 1 year ago
I'm a TEENAGE GIRL, and I think this was one of the best movies ever made.
There were entire sequences taken pannel-for-pannel from the graphic novel, and everyone was cast perfectly, and the opening titles were art at its purest form.
If you haven't seen it, see it. If you've seen it, see it again. Trust me on this.
MissAmiTimeLord 1 year ago 6
@MissAmiTimeLord 3
They made watchmen without the giant squid. I'll let you know thats low. In all honasty i agree with you in casting but the movie was a unintentional middle finger to alan moore.
grandtheftauto5555 1 year ago
@grandtheftauto5555
Or maybe it's just not possible to tell this story in the same way in a different medium. A 2 hour movie is very different from a series of graphic novels.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
i didnt read the comic but i didnt like this movie too much i kinda got bored
codeywings10 1 year ago
i have an idia next time talk about the damn movie
wachmenfan101 1 year ago
Watchmen rocks.
Joecbg100 1 year ago
One of my favorite movies of all time. I am a comic book fan who has never read the watchmen, but I still love this movie.
mattthedemocrat1 1 year ago
Thanks a lot for your review Confused Matthew, especially because you pointed out that the movie is understandable even if you didn't read the comic. I saw the film without any idea of the comic and felt the script explained everything very well. To my disappointment there were a lot of people who stated the opposite, some even wrote that they didn't understand the story at all. Not to mention very dumb comments. Why is that especially men seem to have a problem with Dr. Manhattan's penis?
Meretneith 1 year ago
very entertaining film, a lot of thought-provoking ideas, awesome action and relatable characters. but i have to say that i was kinda bored whenever that blue guy with the mule-penis was on screen. he was a fascinating character, and the movie would have been worse-off without him, but i just wish he didnt have as much screen time. what he brought to the table was good, but his dialogue itself seemed kinda bland and contrived to me. otherwise a great movie.
dinabio1 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its so funny that this failure at life likes hates all the movies that most people like and he likes shitty movies. Watchmen wasnt really liked by most people and me.
dasdasist 2 years ago
Yeah I know what a failure for having his own opinion.
DigitalPh333r 1 year ago
I saw a preview of this movie, and was unsure about it, but later I started to get interested in seeing the movie. it has good music, and a dark realism to it I think. I bought the Complete Motion comic on dvd, instead. I did like the live action movie, but I like the comic better, but good review.
TheAncientdragon1 2 years ago
Damn critics and naysayers! This movie was one of my favorite of last year.
ShaneBeacham 2 years ago 23
The only people who LOVE THIS MOVIE are those that did not read the book; the book was philisophical upheaval for an entire generation.
yarealpoof 2 years ago
I didn't like this movie either. I felt the story was uninteresting. I also found myself bored. This was one of those rare films where people i respect said it was great, and i went into it optimistic. overall i was disappointed.
pale91579 2 years ago
I can imagine Tesiftyexe going to his local cineplex, slapping down $8.50 (because he'll only pay matinee price), and demanding "give me my eight dollars and fifty cents worth of symbolism!" LOL. XD
globbo100 2 years ago
I didn't like "Watchmen".I thought the characters were were both inane and insipid. The story hardly made any sense. Vietnam is defeated, and we have Dr. Manhattan to thank for that? Richard Nixon gets more than two terms, what? When did superheroes become unpaid shills for the state?
globbo100 2 years ago
@globbo100 The actual overarching story is not as important as what it is symbolizing.
Testifyexe 2 years ago
Well, I'm in it for the story, not the symbolism. I guess I'm old fashioned that way.
globbo100 2 years ago
@globbo100 Dude, have you even read the comic book? It's a parallel world. Even reading the synopsis on databases, you can know that.
The story is complex and deals with time. The characters have their problems with humanity, and the theme is about human nature and the bad stuff you've done.
I respect your opinion, but you obviously saw a different movie then a lot of other people, including myself, did.
ShaneBeacham 2 years ago
That's amazing. You say you respect my opinion, and then go out of your way to disrespect me personally by asserting that I watched an entirely different movie than everybody else did.I hope you don't talk this way to your friends and family.Let me be clear: I saw "Watchman" ,and my opinion is based on what I saw.I am not giving opinion on the comic book, because this is a movie review.I could care less about the comic book.
globbo100 2 years ago
That's not disrespecting man, it's just stating that you hated the movie and I loved it. And if you don't wanna read the comic that's fine. But this film is set in an alternate world and you don't even have to read the graphic novel to understand it.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. And no, I don't speak like that to my family and I don't speak like that to anybody, I didn't even speak that way to YOU. Again, I respect your opinion, but that doesn't mean I agree.
Nice Chatting! Shane.
ShaneBeacham 2 years ago
@globbo100 It was an alternate reality and Superheros working for the government was kind of part of the point to it.
DigitalPh333r 1 year ago
the sickest movie in the world!!! 10/10
MyDeenRocks 2 years ago
This was a brilliant movie! 5/5
MetaPunkXP 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I was bored through it most of the time waiting for something to happen. Most of the time it was thinking about the comedean. But I did like the guy with the funny mask. You know the guy who went to prison. "I'm not trapped in here with you, your trapped in here with me!" But what flips me off most is the way to prevent the nuclear war. Instead of wasting lots of cities, why not just nuke where the leaders are, can't go to war without leaders and top people. My plan kills less people. Beat that
frostagent 2 years ago
Is this meant to be serious? Nuke the "top people"? Where the "Leaders are"?? First, aren't they usually in, hmmm, MAJOR CITIES? And secondly, will people just say "Stuff it, lets become a socialist paradise" or being a government will there be NEW LEADERS? Then again, maybe the above comment was just a troll.
RaverMunky 2 years ago
If you take out the government the country will stop. We need the government for stability. That goes for other countries too. As for the socialist paradise, Russia is socialist and I don't see people say, "Let's be Russia, yea!" It will take time to recover sure but as for the crisis of destroying U.S.A and Russia, I think it would pass. After the cold war America won. We should win again.
frostagent 2 years ago
you're a fucking idiot.
1451tyler 2 years ago
when are you gona review gi joe
ghostbusterguy2001 2 years ago
I can't express this enough. You need to read the graphic novel. If you still haven't read it seriously do it. If you loved the movie then you'll love the novel.
nightwishfan1991 2 years ago
omg this guy hates movies that suck, and a few ok ones (but watevs) but i cant believe of all the movies he hates, he likes the one i absoloutly hate. its like my enemy movie i just dont get how its good
FITZY202 2 years ago
We learn that the baddie who killed the guy at the start is the world's smartest man. They go to stop him but are too late and 10 cities are blown up. This stopped America and Russia gonig to war but saved billions are lives. How is that a bad thing? Sure everyone hater Dr Manhatten now but everyone did anyway after the conferance. The smart guy is killed and Dr Manhatten kills Rush-hack then goes back.
So the moral of the story is, saving lives is worse than murder.
The End.
bombadii 2 years ago
It 's matter of prospective, people will disagree with you and say the ends do not justify the means. That is the point of both the movie and the book.
hencharlson 2 years ago
All I'm tryinbg to say in this is that all of the people the smart guy killed were already going to die, their fates were sealed. I'm not trying to be depressing or anything like that, but I'm just trying to say that in my opinion, millions is better than billions.
I'm just giving my honest opinions in this, saying things for reason, saying what I honestly think about films like Confused Matthew does.
bombadii 2 years ago
good.
hencharlson 2 years ago
what im Confused.
hencharlson 2 years ago
Most fo this film is very pointless. Sometime in it we leant that the guy who died at the start was the father of latex-girl (what whet I'm going to call her). This ads nothing! I just gives us a problem with no solution! Dr Manhatten is finally convinced to come back to Earth. At so happens that the machine he was trying to build is finished so why do we need him after what he said?
See part five, the final part of this review.
bombadii 2 years ago
Bombadii's written Watchmen review part three:
Here's Dr Manhatten who is trying to make some kind of machine that will save America as they think Russians will nuke them. Dr Manhatten soon goes to a press conferance where he teleports himself to Mars after screaming a lot and saying that to him there's no differance between an alive person and a dead one. Already he has abandoned everyone to die. He's another good guy.
See part four.
bombadii 2 years ago
Bombadii's written Watchmen review part two:
Next comes a scene in which two superheroes (one of which has no charactor and is just there to have the audiance look at her) talk. The first thing we hear about Rorshack (I can't be bothered learning his name) is in this: We learn that he threw an innocent person down an elevator sharf for basically no reason. Rorshack also, as is said in his "and I'll whisper no" speech says that he wants everyone to die. This is a goodie
See part three.
bombadii 2 years ago
Bombadii's written Watchmen review part one:
To be blunt, I did not like this film. Okay, from the start: It opens with someone who I thought looked like some mob boss watching some yoga show or something to that affect. He then gets attacked in his apartment and this thrown out of a window. As he falls Rorschach (I had to look on wikipedia to find out how to spell his name) tells the world's worst joke. We piscover that the dead person was a superhero.
See part two.
bombadii 2 years ago
Alos, one small thing, the other heroes burnt down a building then saved all but one person. They later set fire to the sky which you can see the rist in. Hence I re-name Knight-own Knigth-arsonist,
bombadii 2 years ago
im shocked he liked this movie... because i thought he had good taste
Filmfanatic34 2 years ago
watchmen was okay, the story was really confusing and didn't make too much sense
GodsAmongMortals 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Watchmen SUCKED, i read the comic but the movie was awful, too awful that i didn't watch it.
teawead 2 years ago
This movie was obviously not for me the only person i liked was Rorschach. The rest just seemed kinda dull. I didnt think it was as great as everybody says it is.
promofan80 2 years ago
hmmm you used to be funny. i was listening every shit u putted here before, haven't listen for about a year and i have no idea in which moment u become so boring. adding this other dude i felt like adding some cheap crap character in some dieing series
remember your lion king review which was fucking awesome
makondoo 2 years ago
yeh i dont like 2 of them
FITZY202 2 years ago
I completely agree that I could have watched this movie if it lasted 6 hours. People around me were bored, but I was fixed at everything that was happening. The implications of each character's backstory, ect.
Mailrobot 2 years ago
it wasn't all that good to me...it was average or slightly above...or even below
sexfanatic 2 years ago
oh BTW confusedmike... if you liked the movie... the comic book is 1000X's better. I defintely would recommend it, even to people who don't read comic books. Watchmen is a great work of literature.
newfrontier3000 2 years ago
I agree, but the movie was really good too.
Famf9983 2 years ago
the graphic novel was amazing and the movie changed the ending that was mind blowing!!! nobody could have seen that coming and they changed it!!!!!
emily41193 2 years ago
Read Black Summer.
A one shot story that is only a few issues long.
Very awesome.
Spoony gives a 3 minute summary
/watch?v=lAX6hm46Cqs
k87jury 2 years ago
One of the WORST movies I have ever seen.Allmost as bad as Batman and Robin.I feel like it was an excuse for the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.The plot and characters are both awfull
TatooineBoy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The ONLY let's say decent thing in this ''movie'' was Rorschach wich was killed at the end of the movie...way to go...
TatooineBoy 2 years ago
Perhaps you should relish the fact that the only character you liked stood up for his ideals and sense of morality even in the face of death.
newfrontier3000 2 years ago
Happened in the comic too
wasnt going to live that guy
GreekJR2 2 years ago
yes but isn't a movie based on a book or graphic novel to be different?My best friend saw the movie and read the graphic novel and told me they are allmost identical
TatooineBoy 2 years ago
The point to making an adaptation like a book is to open the world up to a new audience. A major character death isn't going to change in a translation. They also said that they were planning on keeping it close to the original novel although there was a lot of cosmetic changes. The characters and the plot was very similar to the novel and only went through few changes.
GreekJR2 2 years ago
You're definitely entitled to your opinion, although I disagree with you... but do you sincerely think this is almost as bad as ...*cringe*...batman and robin. That movie should be erased from superhero cinema history. I just think the movie probably just isn't for you.
newfrontier3000 2 years ago
Yeah! Brock was at the church to ask God for forgiveness, but in the film he asks him to kill Parker. WTF!
buc555 2 years ago
This is really odd that you've not read the BOOK (yes book not a comic), and yet you didn't feel lost, because most of the reviews of this film are saying the exact opposite, and I tend to agree. Not that I didn't like the film.
buc555 2 years ago
The comic is actually a character piece, like you were talking about. I mean, really, there are very few battles, cool powers, It's really about a bunch of people and their problems.
jfridy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ummm this movie was terrible. What are u guys talking about???
MusicVideoKing23 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This movie was bullshit.Your liking of it says much about your taste
yellowwasp09 2 years ago
im so fucking glad you guys loved this movie :)!!
DCKar2nist 2 years ago 2
oh if you want to read a amazing comic you should read the "nausicaa of the valley of the winds" series ^^
i liked that movie too by the way lol
happosai27 2 years ago
Dark Knight Returns has not aged well at all. Don't read that.
jackspencerjr 2 years ago
Are you and Stan brothers? You sound very similar.
darthgator007 2 years ago 11
We're Identical twins. No Joke.
standinstann 2 years ago 2
Ah! Well that would explain it.
darthgator007 2 years ago
@darthgator007 They are.
JTKomedy 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This was far from a fantastic movie, it was slow paced bore, with visual delights to make up for it. The only story that was even remotely well executed was Dr Manhatten's story, the rest of it was extremely tiresome to sit through. Lol It was the longest 3 hours of my life!
rich1701 2 years ago
Crap, I accidentally rated this a one instead of a five. Ah well, just posting to say that I enjoyed this review.
Ravnas7 2 years ago
Sorry, but I am a big Spidey fan. I knew/know who Gwen Stacey is/becomes, and I know why the cathedral was chosen. Knowing that information still doesn't make Spider Man 3 any better. If anything knowing all that, and knowing what good stories can come out of the Spidey franchise makes the movie even WORSE.
Bad example :P
firstfist 2 years ago 2
Man, my friends had to drag me into this movie because I usually don't like superheroes but ... shit am I thankful that they did it! All the political background and the plot combined with badass action. How can you not love this!!!
lilbrothaaa 2 years ago
YESS! TOTALLY AGREE! Thanks for your thougths on this outstanding movie which, sadly, seems to be underrated by most moviegoers.
VerwirrterTurnschuh 2 years ago
I loved this movie
GreekJR2 2 years ago
I'm sorry Matt, but for once I'm gonna have to say I didn't like this movie. I mean it's better than most movies around, but I've read the book and the movie seems either empty or just too colourful and actiony compared to the awesome story of the book. The book was british, the film was american (difference of culture had a lot of effect)
islanumblar 2 years ago
Thank you for posting this on youtube, its much easier to watch then on blip.
Ryoku75 2 years ago
it actually sounds like matthew is having a conversation with himself... seeing as they are twins...
petrino 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
What.................. The......................... Fuck................... This movie was fucking terrible what the hell? Maybe it's because the graphic novel is way better is the reason i hate the movie. This movie got so many things wrong that was in the book and the shit they added was so terrible. The sex scene was ridiculous the acting was terrible. The almost had Rorschach right till they fucked up his origin in the end.
Hyde1415 2 years ago
Nice, watched my way up to when you both say I should see the movie first, now that was all worthless xD
AwesomeCoasters 2 years ago
comic books are the driving media behind our current entrainment
even though comic book readers are treated like the red headed step children by other medias
toadenk 2 years ago
Read the graphic novel. Its way better.
SidewaysEscalator 2 years ago
the book or grahpic novel is always better for movies based on them. ecept perhaps twilight they should make the movie as differnt from the booka s possible becuase the book sucks
thezamzie 2 years ago
My only complaint about this movie is how long the intro "credits" take... That's a fantastic feeling when that's the ONLY bad thing you can say about a movie :D
xSolraccarloSx 2 years ago
i love whoever made him review this.
intelgamersguide 2 years ago
WOW... what happened to your voice Matt?
quincyh8u 2 years ago
it's stand in stan also
codycraz223 2 years ago
You two should really read the GN.
It's a lot better,and once you read the GN you won't like the movie as much anymore.
That's what happened to me atleast.
The movie is still great though,no matter what way you look at it.
Adiorocks949 2 years ago
agreed
00frodo 2 years ago
You two really should read the graphic novel, it is far superior and the themes and character conflicts are more developed.
KeyserSoze555 2 years ago
i really liked this film
Geezyk 2 years ago
On your Heroes comments - Heroes greatly, greatly took several huge parts of it's plot and concepts from Watchmen in season 1.
BlazingOwnager 2 years ago 2
It was a good flick, the only things that i found wrong with it was the annoying slow-mo fights, and the owl ship sex scene...oh yeah and the ending..other than that it was a fun movie.
manny4life 2 years ago
you guys should do an unrehearsed review of the Grinch with Jim Carey. ide love to hear your guy's opinions of it.
BiggestNiggest 2 years ago
: / maybe... I need to watch the movie again, because um... well, the movie, at least compared to the book is terrible.
DolphinsNUM34 2 years ago
since you like the movie, do you plan on reading the comic, because the comic ending is totally different than the movie?
sgf129 2 years ago
Music was incredible in the film,
The bit at the funeral where Simon and Garfunkel kicks in was just perfect.
Iacrodgers 2 years ago
I love this movie and this review, i always look forward to your guys reviews, and im glad you guys like this movie, its one of my favorates.
MurphandHodgie 2 years ago
I still need to see this movie, and I've never read the comic book before.
LeonSKennedy828 2 years ago
Did you guys review the director's cut or the original release?
Therapy44me 2 years ago
Finally, someone agrees with me, thanks Matt n Stan.
IAteBrownies 2 years ago
Agree 100%. Great movie.
vintagevideogamegeek 2 years ago
I don't understand how anyone could like this bloated, self important piece of garbage. Blue penises don't bother me but just about everything else in this film does. No one should think of this as a film that sets a standard for anything. X-Men: The Last Stand and Spiderman 3 combined aren't as bad as this atrocious nightmare of a film.
projectdan 2 years ago
I doubt it watchmen was awesome spider man 3 was one of the worst films ever.........the best spoof of a spiderman film was spiderman 3
vinnymcskate 2 years ago
What is it you doubt? Do you mean you disagree with me? Disagreeing and doubting are two completely different concepts but, no, Watchmen is far worse than Spiderman 3 because at least the latter had a sense of humor about itself whereas Watchmen is so busy telling itself it's the greatest thing ever it forgot about being in any way even remotely entertaining.
projectdan 2 years ago
I doubt the validity of your opinion, and I disagree with you. But Watchmen is an awesome movie and don't say spiderman 3 knows how to make fun of itself because no movie should make a spoof of itself if its supposed to have a seriouse atmosphere and as for the self righteousness of watchmen Spiderman 3 was trying to keep 3 villains going at once and then try to bring them together at the end in what it thought was a clever ending.
vinnymcskate 2 years ago
What credentials qualify you to decide whether or not my opinion is any more or less valid than yours? Have any opinion you like but don't deny me mine.
Watchmen is neither awesome nor serious. It's incredibly awkward, unnecessarily violent, and coma-inducing. Spiderman 3 at least has the temerity to end around the two hour mark.
Watchmen is like a pretty girl who doesn't feel the need to exercise her brain: nice to look at but, ultimately, disposable and boring.
projectdan 2 years ago
All I have is statistics. Most critics and fans of superhero movies far preffered watchmen and I wont deny your opinion I'll only defend one of my favourite films/books. Watchmen is serious. It has a serious point to get through about humanity and what it is and where its going. It wasn't overly violent there are far more violent films out there. If Spiderman 3 had gone over 2 hours it might have made better use of characters. Also you think a pretty girl is disposable? thats just weird..
vinnymcskate 2 years ago
Oh thank god, I love you guys
winkles2314 2 years ago
Hey Guys, Directors Cut is available on dvd
AutomatedCritic 2 years ago
THANK YOU!!
I was so worried you'd hate this film. Thank you so fucking much. This is one of my favorite movies of all time. I believed it was a masterpiece.
residentevil25 2 years ago 5
nice
legorocks3 2 years ago
Ugh. I'm dissapointed you guys liked this. It's really a horrible film adaption of the comic.
TheSilhouette 2 years ago
it is almost scene for scene besides the squid.
superdavelbolbo 2 years ago
That actually didn't bother me.
TheSilhouette 2 years ago
Well, that's really your view of it, others love it, its a really great movie, you just have to turn off your brain and love it, its true to the novel and is just brilliant.
NIAStudios 2 years ago
Actually, I think it's a completely superficial adaption of the novel which completely misses half the points it was trying to make.
TheSilhouette 2 years ago
Well, I'm dissapointed in the movie because it was missing the Tentacled-monster, I haven't read the novel, but I've read about them, and it was definately better than the movie.
NIAStudios 2 years ago
@TheSilhouette
Why? Because it was too long for you? Because it had blue penis?
rmgallerani 2 years ago
NO ONE should be afraid of blue penis
terranceshade 2 years ago
No, because it's just plain and simple a terrible movie.
The acting is horrible, the violence is completely gratuitous, stupid and adds nothing to the film, the action scenes are idiotic (might have worked in '300' but certainly not here), it's much too long, but at the same time feels rushed, the use of music was completely cheese-ball and arbitrary, and the production design was horrible.
I could go on, but I don't have enough room.
TheSilhouette 2 years ago
I agree that Silk Spectre and Night Owl were underwhelming, but the people who played Rorschach, The Comedian, and Dr. Manhattan did great jobs. The Violence is gratuitious? What did you expect from an adaptation of Watchmen? Was the violence in 300 too "gratuitious" for you? I can't stand it when people think a film is too long. Aren't you at the movie to have a good time? Where do you have to go? The music was awesome, with small exception of 99 Luft Balloons. That was a bit weird.
rmgallerani 2 years ago
The only one who was any good at all was Rorschach. Everyone else was either barely passable or just plain bad.
Yes, the violence was gratuitous. If you read the book, you'd see that it wasn't nearly as violent. They even changed entire scenes (the little girl kidnapping scene for one) just to make them more violent. And besides, it was just stupid and fake looking anyway.
I haven't read '300', but I assume the violence in that film was more appropriate since it was about a gory battle.
TheSilhouette 2 years ago
And just because you don't think a film can ever be too long (ha!) doesn't mean other people can't think that. This film was obviously much too long and too packed.
Terry Gilliam (who was originally slated to direct it) said that it probably only work as a miniseries, and based on this film, I agree with him.
As for the music - it was like they just took a "greatest hits" list from the 70s and 80s and slapped it on top of the story. It was a completely shallow and arbitrary use of music.
TheSilhouette 2 years ago
I'll say this: the music in this film is comprised of some of the most arbitrary tunes I've ever heard strung together in a film.
Hearing "Unforgettable" in the same breath as "99 Red Balloons" was a surreal experience.
confusedmatthew 2 years ago
I agree. This movie was awesome, and I never read the comic before I watched it, though now I want to.
bonecanoe86 2 years ago
Watchmen cant be a series. It would ruin the whole dynamic. 1 story, 1 graphic novel, 1 movie is all it should ever be.
voidmaster45 2 years ago 3
its the book that changed comics... happy you guys liked it.
destrond69 2 years ago
only one character had superpowers... I really should watch this movie nao :P
Shinokyouku 2 years ago
Hrm, wish you had read the comic. Not necessarily before seeing the movie, but would've been interesting if at least one of you had read the comic afterwards and you could comment on what you thought of the movie having read the original comic.
lseths 2 years ago
Watchmen is the only comic I've ever read, but I highly recommend it. It's better than the movie because the movie has to leave out so much. I'd say Watchmen is a comic book first - the movie is only a pretty decent approximation of it. Watchmen really is a work of art.
bbqplatypus318 2 years ago
it was good, but no, it wasn't 16 hours good
Countachcx 2 years ago
@ :03 this is going to be a much more optimistic and friendly review than our review of The Love Guru
understatement of the year.
Steve2323ZX 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Watchmen blowed. Fuck Alan Moore.
Neasyorc 2 years ago
LOL "blowed" FAIL
cramram6666 2 years ago 2
Dark knight returns is a sort of brother to Watchmen, the first two truely compeling stories. You should at least read Watchmen. It transends mear comics.
Accessoftheblue 2 years ago
Take my advice; read the graphic novel. The movie is a great movie, but the graphic novel is a true masterpiece, with the story themes, the character interactions, and even the panel layouts all challenging the idea of what a graphic novel can be, and presenting an experience you can find something new in every time.
Oh, and for the record, there's no "The" in the title. It's just Watchmen.
Rmlohner 2 years ago 3
Agreed. The movie really doesn't do the graphic novel justice, some of my favorite parts (most notably the Rorschach/Psychiatrist chapter) were missing or very abridged in the movie. I can't really fault the movie for that because if they included everything it would be like 5 hours long, but the graphic novel still is a better experience.
DocYoda 2 years ago
true but the movie was great for graphic novel takeoff you have to admit
ChurchsTwin 2 years ago
The only problem I had with Watchmen is that they had to Slow-mo EVERY SINGLE SCENE!
EvanTurkFilms 2 years ago 3
Finally. thank you stan and mathew, i've been looking for an objective review of this movie and i totally agree
Firelordzerien 2 years ago
YEAH WOOT, 6th VIEW.
possem33 2 years ago 2
this movie was awesome
shedininja001 2 years ago
good movie.
shaun216 2 years ago
loved this film. lot of people didnt but i found it consistently awesome
cuntscab555 2 years ago