oh....when u said THE LOST SYMBOL in the vid title i thought it was a LOST the series vid literally went through 50 vids and had no idea wat everyone was talking about LMFAO
His explanation about the origin of the numbers with those inner angles is just wrong and there is no historical evidence, because they looked very different in ancient india. So they could not count the angles like he did. Oh and has the two, like he wrote it, not 4 inner angles?
Why is he teaching a leason and using wikipedia to get info one the people involved in what he's teaching. Anyone can post anything on wikipedia so its not accurate enough to be used as a legal source for teaching and if it is than it needs to be.
@ShteinbergArts It won't let me post a direct link to your comment, possibly due to anti-spam purposes, but I've updated the video description with it.
@kaewkaew The thing about language is it is a casted spell if used correctly if you just change the word magic and replace it with words like technology.
Just because youi change the name of something does not change the essense of the thing, does it?
hindastand that in the benjamin franklin magic squares, you end up with pyramides in every way, amazing ain't it, I was led here by the NBC interview of Dan Brown, and by his saying, benjamin and most presidents were Freemasons, and freemasons belived in the all seeing eye on the pyramid.
I notice that there is an odd-even-odd pattern in Durer's magic square. Is this common to all magic squares? Do you see other variations such as odd-even-even-odd-even-even, odd-odd-even-even, and so on?..& if so, do these patterns hold true on a scale?(ie would m=8's pattern be the same as m=64, or s=5 same as s=25?) I'm fascinated by this:)
very interesting, if you write the 2 as a Z, it will have the required angles. My maths teachers would be turning in their graves, if they knew I was watching this, I was a poor student of maths.
idiots....THE HINDUS ARE THE ONES THAT INVENTED THE NUMBER SYSTEM.
This stupid professor and all others have so much time on their hands they start analysing the angles of numbers?!?!?! what a laod of crap, no one cares.
People make so much crap up these days, You might aswell have a PHD in bullshit.
4-20-2012 You got a job? Go on strike until they legalize cannabis! It's the only way to get full scale recreational legalization! Be the change! All you have to do is spread the word to everyone you know and every website you visit! Start a chainmail, get pro pot organizations involved. Blog about it. Like it. Thumbs up this message everywhere you see it! Let this message grow like a weed! We are the Marijuana Nation! On 4-20-2012 don't go to work instead toke up and protest! !!WE ARE DEFIANT!!
Listen to his accent and you will understand why he understands Freemasonry so well. "Conquer from within" is a concept this professor knows all too well.
@15:47-17:05 The part on symbols made me play the stop button. Is he making up this internal angle stuff or what? I that case 2,7 = Z, 1,8 = X and 4,5 = Y
@alemar1122 on #1 - the numerals weren't always written the way we write them today. They got changed first by the Arabians, then by the Europeans, and kept changing even until today. Did you know, for example, that there is difference between the way the numbers four and seven are written in the US and in Europe?
Well, yeah, but, what's the point? What's the application? What does this have to do with Masons? So men meeting in secret came up with secret handshakes, secret signs and used silly ciphers? So what? The guy demonstrated some code, stuff I knew about back in the '70's when I was a kid. What's the application? What's the point? He brought nothing to the table. I learned all that in the public library 30+ years ago, on my own, as a small boy. We boys all used the pig-pen cipher with keys.
i have never seen number seven written that way, I have seen number one with one line below. thats some major bullshit, inner angles dont work on 4 6 9
I didnt find the msg he was talking about in the description: "If you know about these things AND you can decipher the message below"
Basically that was probly a part of the email he sent to CUNYQueensborough to copy paste in the description. Unfortunatly, the "message below" wasnt copyed and CUNYQueensborough didnt find it important to remove this small part from their description. Come on here, the young gen are trying to keep their youtube clean !
Why the heck does the moron try to explain something when he hasn't done his homework? The thing about the angles in the numbers are correct, but how about preparing himself a bit so he can do it correctly on the blackboard. Not even the number 2 could he draw correctly (it is supposed to look like a Z, with two angles).
This is clearly an amateur with no other purpose than to show off. Just the way he promotes himself and his software, and laughs at other peoples mistakes.
@TirianB I enjoyed his free presentation and was familiarized with things I otherwise wouldn't have known about. No one is perfect, no reason to be so hard on him.
Theres only 16 letters so you would have to find your 16 letter message before you creat your code? its not like you can make a paragraph of this seceret code unless you did a few 4x4 seceret code boxes next to each other with different codes that add up to different words to say what you wanted to. right?
@mcamron It's you, sir who is wrong. Our modern numerals (as well as many in ancient history) are, to some extent, based on number of strokes. Perhaps you'd do well to do some research first, then comment.
@soundiscomforting Yes it is. Science covers many, many different topics and themes, not just a few or only one. Very ignorant of you to say such a thing. It shows that you have very little knowledge or wisdom.
For god's shake the Arabic number system was not shaped like this because of the angles that the symbols have. This is totally wrong and not scientific at all, go ask a serious mathematician.
@mcamoran You also seem to have very little knowledge of what science is. Science is.... well, just see my other comments on this video. I don't feel like typing it all out again.
@apocaRUFF I commented the fact that this teacher said that the shape of the arabic numbers came from the number of angles that the number symbols have. What didn't you understand? Didn't you know that the numbers we have today and the numerical system was invented by the Arabs, even the name "Algebra" is Arabic.
@mcamoran wikapedia says numbers were hindu but spread by arabs so in the europe and africa we called them arabic numerals. i dont think the angles of the characters have anything to do with the value they represent though, well maybe 1
What would you say, if I'll tell you that nobody knows where numerical, including algebra system, came from? Maya society, knew math before Arabs started to exist. Math, as we know today, was brought by Persians from India to Europe. In fact, Arabs never invented anything in all the history of humanity. But they did collect a Lot of great knowledge from others cultures. That was before they've became Muslims. After what, they've closed their eyes to all knowledge beside Karan.
"The reason they are more commonly known as "Arabic numerals" in Europe and the Americas is that they were introduced to Europe in the 10th century by Arabs of North Africa, who were then using the digits from Libya to Morocco. Europeans did not know about the numerals' origins in ancient India, so they named them "Arabic numerals". Arabs, on the other hand, call the system "Hindu numerals", referring to their origin in India."
Arabs did not invent the number system. The real inventor of it are the HINDUs from the ancient India. Try to broaden your research with regard to this issue.
@mcamoran Correction it was not invented by the arabs. The Indians invented the modern number system. It is often called Arabic numerals because it came to Europe through the Arabs. But Arabs themselves call it as "HindSaa" meaning - "given by Hindus or Indians". The Persians copied the Indian number system and then passed it on to the Arabs. Then an Italian mathematician named Fibonacci traveled to Algeria to study. When he came back home, he brought the Indian numerals with him.
@griptimous Yes I agree with you, it was introduced by the Arabs, but you have to admit that this numerical system was started being shaped even from the time of Babylon. Other civilizations i.e. the Greek's had other system's to express the same ideas. The Greeks had the Greek alphabet.
@mcamoran A slight correction: Even though in the Western world the numerical system we now us were called Arabic numerals because we got them from the Arabs, this system was not invented by Arabs. In fact it was invented in India and through trade was brought to the Arab world.
The Greek and Roman numerals were fine for day-to-day calculations, but when using complicated calculations involving huge numbers their systems broke down, instead of the Indian decimal system that allowed all kinds of calculations. The concept of "0" or zero, was invented by the Hindus as well and integrated that concept in their numerical system.
@MrBakaBana What are you trying to tell? Archimedes the most intelligent mathematician of all times, used the Greek alphabet for his calculation! The Greek and Roman numeral seem tough to use, because we are used to the "arabic" numeral system!
@mcamoran That's wrong. The number system was not invented by the arabs. It was taken from India / hinduism by the arabs to the middle east from where it spread to the west.
@smuralisankar Actually it was the Asians who first learned of 'magic squares' from the belly of a turtle...but to be more precise, any forbidden knowledge was first obtained in the garden of Eden,,,,from the Serpent to the Woman, the first earthly deity...having become enlightened and 'equal to a god' and stll calls the shots from her Capitols namely Indianapolis and Washingtonl
@mcamoran The number system came from INdia who had an overstanding of zero and could do complicated math. Like atonement. At ONE ment. They passed it on to Arabs , then to the Roma who had no idea about zero.
This is my research. Before them I don't know where the Aryans In India got it from.
@b0ondockz I didn't say that. I only said that using Wikipedia as reference when you are a professor is pretty lame. You have tons of books written by professionals who could illustrate your theories, but then you take wikipedia as example. It is an insult to those who wrote those great books and it is an insult to the viewer, thinking that he doesn't know any books.
@Fapsamup It's perfectly fine to use Wikipedia for simple reference. He wasn't give a study of Durer, just making reference to him. Wikipedia is fine for surface glancing. Surely, if you want concrete, by all means delve deeper, but the dissertation was on the codes themselves - not the dude. I totally agree that Wikipedia isn't reliable for true research, but you can use it casually, just as in this case. It had the proper picture of the magic box, anyway.
@b0ondockz said, "So everything on Wikipedia is completely wrong?" Well, how about: nothing in Wikipedia is completely true. Does that help? Use it like a "Trivial Pursuit" game. Wikipedia is great for entertainment, hours of wasted time gleaning worthless tidbids about nothing. Celebs and popstars, and you can easily find out State Capitals and stuff too. Wikipedia is fluff and nothing more. Use it casually and you'll be fine. But take care not to appear a fool and use it in serious research.
@jacobyte100 There are many things on Wikipedia that are completely true. There is a lot of information on Wikipedia that is taken from "serious research". Many sources of information, including those not on Wikipedia, contain error. For purposes such as showing who Albrecht Durer is, it's more than sufficient. If that is your idea of serious research, then adding a child's encyclopedia to one's library should contain the proper amount of information needed to carry such research out.
@Fapsamup Not really. A website containing information which is free to be edited by anyone at any time can not officially be academically viable. Not everything on wikipedia is fact.
multiply each value in square by 3 and add digits of answer together e.g 3x4=12, 1+2 = 3 you should only get 3, 6, or 9, now redo magic square replacing with 3 6 or 9 and join the dots u will eventually get the star of david 666 888 knights templar cross the value 216 also known as the holy of holies u will also get the owl plus much much more have fun
This has been flagged as spam show
Puzzle fans, want to play magic square on Android phone or tablet?
Just search keyword "Magic Square" on Android Market,
rank first is your best choice. Enjoy it!
BrainyAdv 2 weeks ago
Kinda a long winded class, but very informative in practice/application .. Thanks Cuny :)
JustJinxed 2 weeks ago
Ed Brumgnach? yeah he went to my highschool
mark1138 1 month ago
nice subject but c'mon does he really need to make that pauses???? spit it out!
kikebjj 1 month ago
oh....when u said THE LOST SYMBOL in the vid title i thought it was a LOST the series vid literally went through 50 vids and had no idea wat everyone was talking about LMFAO
bubblebarnacles 2 months ago
thanks for the information
khaledb77 2 months ago
FAIL 17:04
MyBulletTV 2 months ago
easy ...
iZuzana 2 months ago
His explanation about the origin of the numbers with those inner angles is just wrong and there is no historical evidence, because they looked very different in ancient india. So they could not count the angles like he did. Oh and has the two, like he wrote it, not 4 inner angles?
Stabacs 2 months ago
@Stabacs You're so right. This is folklore. He even draws the "2" wrong and doesn't count all the angles. This is a terrible waste of time.
GodownEd1 2 months ago
horrible teacher too
redrum41987 2 months ago
useless class
redrum41987 2 months ago
Why is he teaching a leason and using wikipedia to get info one the people involved in what he's teaching. Anyone can post anything on wikipedia so its not accurate enough to be used as a legal source for teaching and if it is than it needs to be.
grant953 3 months ago
thank you gut it!
ShteinbergArts 4 months ago
can you please post the website with the squares calculations you using in 12:00 on ....... thank you!
ShteinbergArts 4 months ago
@ShteinbergArts It won't let me post a direct link to your comment, possibly due to anti-spam purposes, but I've updated the video description with it.
CUNYQueensborough 4 months ago
Your history is wrong,,,,
MyThoughtsIhave 4 months ago
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. --Arthur C Clarke
thedudeBL 4 months ago
I got it: the answer to the universe! A magic square such that S=42 :)
VPStream 4 months ago
and ehhhh......
Mrrrs 4 months ago
4:28 in some magic squares even 4 numbers in the corners have same sum,also 4 "in" numbers,that dont touch sides of the square
bukowski1950 4 months ago
MY God! I had this guy as my electronics teacher over 20 years ago! He doesn't look a day older then then! He's a great teacher. Fantastic guy!
SpandexManney 5 months ago
@SpandexManney that's the weird thing 'bout teachers, they don't age O.o.
nevyn1 4 months ago
I lolled @ "where's the other 2 angle?"
LuciferAmadeus 5 months ago
What a riveting speaker! And I thought the art of oratory was dead.
mrmoss6881 5 months ago
Thanks for this nice and bright lecture professor :)
Khwartz 5 months ago
Wow this guy is retarded, he can't even show us the material... it's like a substitute gym teacher coming in to teach the class physics.
squirreljester2 5 months ago
Wow, I'm 30 seconds into this, and I'm thinking "is these horrid jokes going to be a view of things to come in this talk?
squirreljester2 5 months ago
Agreed the first few minutes seems like hes just relaying stuff from online.... not capturing my interest at all
lessavit 5 months ago
)) in america professors freely use wikipedia on lectures! our profs should tell by heart or read from the book or self made notes....
exorgirl 5 months ago
sure its a mathematical square, a cipher square, but nothing really magical about it, its just using good math
kaewkaew 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kaewkaew so, you need to know a much more than you know to say that ;)
axelaxer 5 months ago
@kaewkaew The thing about language is it is a casted spell if used correctly if you just change the word magic and replace it with words like technology.
Just because youi change the name of something does not change the essense of the thing, does it?
allthingsarelikethis 4 months ago
hindastand that in the benjamin franklin magic squares, you end up with pyramides in every way, amazing ain't it, I was led here by the NBC interview of Dan Brown, and by his saying, benjamin and most presidents were Freemasons, and freemasons belived in the all seeing eye on the pyramid.
ShabazDraee 5 months ago
I just love the dude passing by at 7:25
lyracrisier 5 months ago
Comment removed
lyracrisier 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I notice that there is an odd-even-odd pattern in Durer's magic square. Is this common to all magic squares? Do you see other variations such as odd-even-even-odd-even-even, odd-odd-even-even, and so on?..& if so, do these patterns hold true on a scale?(ie would m=8's pattern be the same as m=64, or s=5 same as s=25?) I'm fascinated by this:)
f1471in3r 5 months ago
Comment removed
f1471in3r 5 months ago
He damn sounds like Jeff Bridges... LOL
diavarezable 6 months ago
LOL, this guy sounds drunk. "He's a gentleman... ... ... I assume."
TheClintond 6 months ago
very interesting, if you write the 2 as a Z, it will have the required angles. My maths teachers would be turning in their graves, if they knew I was watching this, I was a poor student of maths.
vcamp1212 6 months ago
hey look, why is everywhere else i check this kind of masonic cipher i see? was the prof wrong? check wiki or google it
JESSER0123 6 months ago
is this a lecture on school? or a special lecture? kinda interesting if this was taught on school :D
JESSER0123 6 months ago
Posting comments should be disabled. Some people obviously cannot seem to comprehend the idea of respecting knowledge.
sarcasticsmileable 6 months ago
the movie he is referring to is wind talkers
snake69420 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"THE HINDUS ARE THE ONES THAT INVENTED THE NUMBER SYSTEM"??
Well, it depends on what you meant by "number system".
Our daily used decimal based number *symbols* were invented by the Hindus: Yes.
"number system" invented by the Hindus: No, absolutely NOT! Number system(s) exist by themselves.
Horinius 7 months ago
"He is, uhh...... very exciting person." He certainly seems drunk.
saguanno 7 months ago
He is drunk ! -.-
jungasale 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SOLAR TREE OF LIFE ,ACCORDING TO THE SOLAR SYSTEM ORDER'
0=TIPHERETH 1=HOD 2=NETZACK 3=YESOD 4=MALKUTH 5=GEBURAH 6=HESED 7=BINAH 8=HOCHMAH 9=KETHER
0=SUN 1=MERCURY 2=VENUS 3=MOON 4=EARTH 5=MARS 6=JUPITER
7=SATURN 8=URANUS 9=NEPTUNE....TEN AND NOT ELEVEN.
SuperHorusra 7 months ago
This is crap !!! Is he paid for talking this shit???
Daihyper 7 months ago
Comment removed
mcamoran 6 months ago
idiots....THE HINDUS ARE THE ONES THAT INVENTED THE NUMBER SYSTEM.
This stupid professor and all others have so much time on their hands they start analysing the angles of numbers?!?!?! what a laod of crap, no one cares.
People make so much crap up these days, You might aswell have a PHD in bullshit.
secret1234567890123 7 months ago
@secret1234567890123 You have so much time on your hand to watch this that you are calling yourself stupid.
How does someone with this mentality have name like secret@12345.....
You must be paid by government
haraldschl 6 months ago
*has
FruityCoversLoops 8 months ago
Number 2 as 4 interior angles... This is crap -.-
FruityCoversLoops 8 months ago
he is sooo annoying
hman111 8 months ago
4-20-2012 You got a job? Go on strike until they legalize cannabis! It's the only way to get full scale recreational legalization! Be the change! All you have to do is spread the word to everyone you know and every website you visit! Start a chainmail, get pro pot organizations involved. Blog about it. Like it. Thumbs up this message everywhere you see it! Let this message grow like a weed! We are the Marijuana Nation! On 4-20-2012 don't go to work instead toke up and protest! !!WE ARE DEFIANT!!
WiiLink89 9 months ago
@16:22 where is the other two???!! xD
DeathOwl 9 months ago
This guys was funny in the beginning
rjravaz 9 months ago
Listen to his accent and you will understand why he understands Freemasonry so well. "Conquer from within" is a concept this professor knows all too well.
Fedcop78 9 months ago
@15:47-17:05 The part on symbols made me play the stop button. Is he making up this internal angle stuff or what? I that case 2,7 = Z, 1,8 = X and 4,5 = Y
beltonism 9 months ago
first joke was kinda lame! lol the way he delivered the pizza joke everyone was like oh crap did he really ate it?
BigKittyVideos 11 months ago
first joke was kinda lame! lol
BigKittyVideos 11 months ago
@BigKittyVideos Eh, it just went over the audiences head. You'd get it if you had a PhD in mathematics. Ask "Mcamoran" about it.
apocaRUFF 6 months ago
got strange idea that great pyramid is 3d magic square -)
nibus126 11 months ago
#1 your numbers are wrong 6,9 have the same number of angles, 8 only works as 2 stacked squares but then 0 would logically be 4
#2 you leave out that magic squares also are added by the corners
#3 a 4x4 magic square cant be used as a pig pen cipher as you run out of letters half way through the square (not even counting the X)
alemar1122 1 year ago
@alemar1122 on #1 - the numerals weren't always written the way we write them today. They got changed first by the Arabians, then by the Europeans, and kept changing even until today. Did you know, for example, that there is difference between the way the numbers four and seven are written in the US and in Europe?
Firewalkerbg 9 months ago
17:05 laughed my ass off.
OrionKnights 1 year ago
Well, yeah, but, what's the point? What's the application? What does this have to do with Masons? So men meeting in secret came up with secret handshakes, secret signs and used silly ciphers? So what? The guy demonstrated some code, stuff I knew about back in the '70's when I was a kid. What's the application? What's the point? He brought nothing to the table. I learned all that in the public library 30+ years ago, on my own, as a small boy. We boys all used the pig-pen cipher with keys.
jacobyte100 1 year ago
the number 2 should be written like a Z hence two interior angles (16:30)
amash76 1 year ago
the number 2 should be written like a Z hence two interior angles
amash76 1 year ago
Pity to see Gandalf so overweight..
irrationalxv 1 year ago
this jew sucks!!!!!!!!
solomonwillaby 1 year ago
ahahhahahah such a great joke :->
michaelRafailov 1 year ago
I'd fall asleap in 30 sec if I really had to listen to this guy.
willghass 1 year ago
:O Dan brown's book the da Vinci code has made me question some stuff he actually did alot of research before righting the book it's very interesting
gmansilentassassin 1 year ago
33:11 franklin's tower lyrics.
MRBORGHEAD 1 year ago
Comment removed
MRBORGHEAD 1 year ago
i have never seen number seven written that way, I have seen number one with one line below. thats some major bullshit, inner angles dont work on 4 6 9
elysiumx444 1 year ago
He seems a little bit slow. But doesn't mean his less smart.
Beldau 1 year ago
Comment removed
Beldau 1 year ago
that guy moans alot.
KarySanger 1 year ago
I didnt find the msg he was talking about in the description: "If you know about these things AND you can decipher the message below"
Basically that was probly a part of the email he sent to CUNYQueensborough to copy paste in the description. Unfortunatly, the "message below" wasnt copyed and CUNYQueensborough didnt find it important to remove this small part from their description. Come on here, the young gen are trying to keep their youtube clean !
Charleslebel88 1 year ago
He has a funny way of pronouncing "Dürer". Also, Hungary was part of the German empire back in the days.
GaolisVideoLog 1 year ago
Professor my ass.
TirianB 1 year ago
@TirianB Shut up.
AlphaWolfOverman02 1 year ago
@AlphaWolfOverman02 Shut up yourself, moron.
TirianB 1 year ago
Why the heck does the moron try to explain something when he hasn't done his homework? The thing about the angles in the numbers are correct, but how about preparing himself a bit so he can do it correctly on the blackboard. Not even the number 2 could he draw correctly (it is supposed to look like a Z, with two angles).
This is clearly an amateur with no other purpose than to show off. Just the way he promotes himself and his software, and laughs at other peoples mistakes.
TirianB 1 year ago
@TirianB I enjoyed his free presentation and was familiarized with things I otherwise wouldn't have known about. No one is perfect, no reason to be so hard on him.
67CTA14710V 1 year ago
Theres only 16 letters so you would have to find your 16 letter message before you creat your code? its not like you can make a paragraph of this seceret code unless you did a few 4x4 seceret code boxes next to each other with different codes that add up to different words to say what you wanted to. right?
MonsterSlayer14 1 year ago
@MonsterSlayer14 unless you did like a 8x8 or something
MonsterSlayer14 1 year ago
Wikipedia FTW
barod1 1 year ago
i did a 3x3 4x4 5x5 6x6 7x7 8x8 9x9 magic squares. and the 8x8 is a true one.
zerosun1 1 year ago
1:44 fucking a keyboard :P
aboody006 1 year ago
where the fuck is my pizza
bambamthankyamaam 1 year ago
Is he from South park mhmk?
minotarr 1 year ago
@minotarr LOL word he always sayin mhkay like dat weird dude in south park
alphabroly28 1 year ago
@mcamron It's you, sir who is wrong. Our modern numerals (as well as many in ancient history) are, to some extent, based on number of strokes. Perhaps you'd do well to do some research first, then comment.
drpool2424 1 year ago
Great Guy!--Love the sense of humor and knowledge he offers.
lty2k84 1 year ago
When he talks about the origin of the way we write numerals by counting their internal angles he is talking bullcrap.
Also, I really don't see the point to this lecture.....
blabby102 1 year ago
this is pathetic. not scientific at all
soundiscomforting 1 year ago
@soundiscomforting Yes it is. Science covers many, many different topics and themes, not just a few or only one. Very ignorant of you to say such a thing. It shows that you have very little knowledge or wisdom.
apocaRUFF 1 year ago
dad eat a goat .a goat may eat meat...then sacrafice it :\
fro what/../.......
tonicunrest 1 year ago
{peotry''
the soothing f
sum
34
half
tonicunrest 1 year ago
For god's shake the Arabic number system was not shaped like this because of the angles that the symbols have. This is totally wrong and not scientific at all, go ask a serious mathematician.
mcamoran 1 year ago
@mcamoran muslim cunt
benettox 1 year ago
@benettox What an idiot!!!!!!
mcamoran 1 year ago
@mcamoran You also seem to have very little knowledge of what science is. Science is.... well, just see my other comments on this video. I don't feel like typing it all out again.
apocaRUFF 1 year ago
@apocaRUFF I commented the fact that this teacher said that the shape of the arabic numbers came from the number of angles that the number symbols have. What didn't you understand? Didn't you know that the numbers we have today and the numerical system was invented by the Arabs, even the name "Algebra" is Arabic.
mcamoran 1 year ago 29
@mcamoran yep yep look at your hands it has 18 and 81 too ... out of subject
aboody006 1 year ago
@mcamoran wikapedia says numbers were hindu but spread by arabs so in the europe and africa we called them arabic numerals. i dont think the angles of the characters have anything to do with the value they represent though, well maybe 1
flash3695 1 year ago
What would you say, if I'll tell you that nobody knows where numerical, including algebra system, came from? Maya society, knew math before Arabs started to exist. Math, as we know today, was brought by Persians from India to Europe. In fact, Arabs never invented anything in all the history of humanity. But they did collect a Lot of great knowledge from others cultures. That was before they've became Muslims. After what, they've closed their eyes to all knowledge beside Karan.
5Daniil5 1 year ago
@mcamoran
"The reason they are more commonly known as "Arabic numerals" in Europe and the Americas is that they were introduced to Europe in the 10th century by Arabs of North Africa, who were then using the digits from Libya to Morocco. Europeans did not know about the numerals' origins in ancient India, so they named them "Arabic numerals". Arabs, on the other hand, call the system "Hindu numerals", referring to their origin in India."
boyscout531 1 year ago
@mcamoran Indeed. Europe's rise out of the dark ages was due to the revival and rediscovery of Arabic scientific and mathematical genius.
TooChill 8 months ago
Arabs did not invent the number system. The real inventor of it are the HINDUs from the ancient India. Try to broaden your research with regard to this issue.
griptimous 8 months ago
@mcamoran Correction it was not invented by the arabs. The Indians invented the modern number system. It is often called Arabic numerals because it came to Europe through the Arabs. But Arabs themselves call it as "HindSaa" meaning - "given by Hindus or Indians". The Persians copied the Indian number system and then passed it on to the Arabs. Then an Italian mathematician named Fibonacci traveled to Algeria to study. When he came back home, he brought the Indian numerals with him.
griptimous 8 months ago
@griptimous Yes I agree with you, it was introduced by the Arabs, but you have to admit that this numerical system was started being shaped even from the time of Babylon. Other civilizations i.e. the Greek's had other system's to express the same ideas. The Greeks had the Greek alphabet.
mcamoran 8 months ago
@griptimous But the shape of the numbers has nothing to do with the number of the angles as stated in this video, this is pseudo-science.
mcamoran 8 months ago
@mcamoran A slight correction: Even though in the Western world the numerical system we now us were called Arabic numerals because we got them from the Arabs, this system was not invented by Arabs. In fact it was invented in India and through trade was brought to the Arab world.
MrBakaBana 7 months ago
The Greek and Roman numerals were fine for day-to-day calculations, but when using complicated calculations involving huge numbers their systems broke down, instead of the Indian decimal system that allowed all kinds of calculations. The concept of "0" or zero, was invented by the Hindus as well and integrated that concept in their numerical system.
MrBakaBana 7 months ago
@MrBakaBana What are you trying to tell? Archimedes the most intelligent mathematician of all times, used the Greek alphabet for his calculation! The Greek and Roman numeral seem tough to use, because we are used to the "arabic" numeral system!
mcamoran 6 months ago
@mcamoran As an Arabic person, I confirm your fact.
Twiglaser 6 months ago
Comment removed
OzSpud72 6 months ago
@mcamoran
the "Arabic" numerals as a matter of fact, were Invented in guess where, NOT in the Arab world, but in South Asia !!
Before you start arguing, go look it up any where in any credible source. Thanks.
binoyrakesh 6 months ago
@binoyrakesh Ok but it has nothing to do with the angles as stated in the video!
mcamoran 6 months ago
@mcamoran That's wrong. The number system was not invented by the arabs. It was taken from India / hinduism by the arabs to the middle east from where it spread to the west.
smuralisankar 6 months ago 9
@smuralisankar Actually it was the Asians who first learned of 'magic squares' from the belly of a turtle...but to be more precise, any forbidden knowledge was first obtained in the garden of Eden,,,,from the Serpent to the Woman, the first earthly deity...having become enlightened and 'equal to a god' and stll calls the shots from her Capitols namely Indianapolis and Washingtonl
protestantsep 5 months ago
@protestantsep
Actually no, because that's just fiction and any sane, non-brainwashed human being doesn't actually believe in such bullshit.
ChazeQ 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ChazeQ you assume I'm human.
protestantsep 5 months ago
@mcamoran The number system came from INdia who had an overstanding of zero and could do complicated math. Like atonement. At ONE ment. They passed it on to Arabs , then to the Roma who had no idea about zero.
This is my research. Before them I don't know where the Aryans In India got it from.
attilaclark 6 months ago
Comment removed
f1471in3r 5 months ago
Comment removed
f1471in3r 5 months ago
@apocaRUFF I hold a Phd in mathematics!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am a scientist.
mcamoran 6 months ago
wow, cool code
speedproductions797 1 year ago
very interesting! thanks for sharing.
vassog 1 year ago
@vassog lost me at 1
benettox 1 year ago
@benettox actually i watched the rest, this guy is good
benettox 1 year ago
lost me at two minutes.
baalisgod666 1 year ago
the movie he's talking about is "wind talkers"
cowwboyfromhell 1 year ago
Very nice video. Where to find out more from the same professor?
ezequiasrocha 1 year ago
Its just a bigger sudoku :S
SirRampautus 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SirRampautus whats wrong with Wikipedia ?
cowwboyfromhell 1 year ago
wow, i take it people paid to hear this talk. wot a tonne of pointless crap.
marcarmstrong88 1 year ago
Really great to see a professor using Wikipedia to back up his theories...
Fapsamup 1 year ago 40
@Fapsamup
¨
Hes showing some picturs, not taking fact straight away.
Derp
Marcuzoz 1 year ago
@Fapsamup More like using his theories to backup wikipedia.. BOOM... Mind fuck,
lacerta999 1 year ago
@lacerta999
wikipedia is a mind fuck
UND34DC0WZ 1 year ago
@Fapsamup So everything on Wikipedia is completely wrong?
b0ondockz 1 year ago
@b0ondockz I didn't say that. I only said that using Wikipedia as reference when you are a professor is pretty lame. You have tons of books written by professionals who could illustrate your theories, but then you take wikipedia as example. It is an insult to those who wrote those great books and it is an insult to the viewer, thinking that he doesn't know any books.
Fapsamup 1 year ago
@Fapsamup It's perfectly fine to use Wikipedia for simple reference. He wasn't give a study of Durer, just making reference to him. Wikipedia is fine for surface glancing. Surely, if you want concrete, by all means delve deeper, but the dissertation was on the codes themselves - not the dude. I totally agree that Wikipedia isn't reliable for true research, but you can use it casually, just as in this case. It had the proper picture of the magic box, anyway.
jacobyte100 1 year ago
@b0ondockz said, "So everything on Wikipedia is completely wrong?" Well, how about: nothing in Wikipedia is completely true. Does that help? Use it like a "Trivial Pursuit" game. Wikipedia is great for entertainment, hours of wasted time gleaning worthless tidbids about nothing. Celebs and popstars, and you can easily find out State Capitals and stuff too. Wikipedia is fluff and nothing more. Use it casually and you'll be fine. But take care not to appear a fool and use it in serious research.
jacobyte100 1 year ago
@jacobyte100 There are many things on Wikipedia that are completely true. There is a lot of information on Wikipedia that is taken from "serious research". Many sources of information, including those not on Wikipedia, contain error. For purposes such as showing who Albrecht Durer is, it's more than sufficient. If that is your idea of serious research, then adding a child's encyclopedia to one's library should contain the proper amount of information needed to carry such research out.
b0ondockz 1 year ago
@Fapsamup because Wikia is awesome!
spacenoise5 1 year ago
@Fapsamup Not really. A website containing information which is free to be edited by anyone at any time can not officially be academically viable. Not everything on wikipedia is fact.
spiderliam 8 months ago
Wikipedia...
Warfresco 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Warfresco whats wrong with Wikipedia ?
cowwboyfromhell 1 year ago
i'll stick with base 10 and matrices thanks ROFL!
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
WHAT THE HELL IS UP WITH THE VOCALIZATION
ventureelect 1 year ago
@ventureelect LOL
benzie13 1 year ago
the number '2' as drawn would have four interior angles
GhostInTheShell09 2 years ago 2
@GhostInTheShell09 the real ancient 2 is "Z"
mathfreak87 1 year ago
multiply each value in square by 3 and add digits of answer together e.g 3x4=12, 1+2 = 3 you should only get 3, 6, or 9, now redo magic square replacing with 3 6 or 9 and join the dots u will eventually get the star of david 666 888 knights templar cross the value 216 also known as the holy of holies u will also get the owl plus much much more have fun
888esar 2 years ago
洛書跟 windtalkers 都出現了.
chifoone 2 years ago
Nice presentation. But i make up in your presentation that you CAN NOT brake the code WITHOUT the magic key word ??
is that correct, then how did anybody ever deciphor it?
voidows 2 years ago
God observation.
No one could decipher the message because they did not know the key word. They had to come to the lecture to find out what key word I used.
Ed
brumbrumbrum123 2 years ago