Added: 3 years ago
From: CandyDanny
Views: 10,092
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (100)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i think jodelle ferland should have been cast as Jane because she fit the description so well.

    I think Dakota is a fantastic actress for her age, but in regards to her being cast as Jane I think it was just a publicity stunt.

    In twilight they pushed the fact that they wanted unknown actors to play these characters and then they went and cast someone as famous as Dakota Fanning. You do the math...

  • Why not her sister Elle?

  • i think she'll be an awesome jane

  • dakota is awsome yall so they can change jane as 15

    \

  • You know what. You all complain abt Dakota now... but when the movie comes out, you'll love her. Why? Because alota you dumbasses also complained against the casting of Edward, Bella, and everyone else. And now you morons are like "OMG EDWARD IS SOOO HOT, HES PERFECT<3"

  • Half of them aint watched her in movies and she is amazing, i hate people who say she will be shit LOL all i am going to say is watch HIDE AND SEEK to people who thinks see will be shit!!!!

  • agreed

  • dont think so!

  • she will be a awesome jane she is pretty and young she can totally act the role!!!<3

  • Dakota will be amazing as Jane. I can't think of anyone else who could.

  • she defff should ~!!

  • she looks fucking FANTASTIC.

    I didnt like the choice at first, but then i remebered she's 15 now, she's not the 8 year old in 'Taken' :P

    Seriously, she look unbeliviably fantastic to play the role, and I can't wait to see her, definately one my idols :D

  • alright, you know what I think? I think everyone should give her a chance - we should judge when we actually SEE the movie! I think it's wrong to judge her before we actually see her as Jane. Personally, she's probably going to do a good job! if you've seen Hide & Seek, you'll know what I mean. Yeah, Jodelle Ferland was a good pick for Jane, but she auditioned and didn't get the part - it happens all the time. So give it a rest, guys. Dakota's cast, and there's no sense in complaining about it.

  • 59 minutes ago) Show Hide 0 Marked as spam Reply | Spam M NOT TRYING TO ADVERTISE BUT IM SCARED OF WHAT IT SEES in 1908 a lady named sally rusa was in the woods looking for a dog until a ghost came and killed her so if ur reading this u will find a bloody body in your closet hanging there haunting you and will kill you and ur family and if u want to stop this just sends this to 6 videos in 30 mins or this will happen good luck!! and i only did this because it freaked me out o.o

  • i think she could be a vampire..... shes pale and has eyes tht stand outt.

    PERFECT

  • i have no idea WHY they want Dakota to play Jane. She's a horrible actress as it is anyway.

  • i hate that she is in the movie

    she looks to bubbly and she donsnt have the right features of what jane would have in real life :(

    but at least she would look

    dead

  • She'll be playing jane's role in the movie!!

  • ohhh i hate dakota

  • i havent read the books but she can be a good jane whoever jane is

  • Jane: teenager, short blond hair, short in height and child-like features.

    Dakota Fanning has all of these qualities so i honestly don't understand why everyone thinks Jodelle is the best Jane. Jodelle is a bit to young to play her. give Dakota a chance, guys

  • i'm not exactly on team jodelle, but dakota totally doesn't look like Jane. Jane has short, brown hair, small, childlike features and is 13.

    But still I have hope in Jane ^^

  • she is 15

  • yeah, I know dakota is 15, but Jane is 13. Stephanie Meyer said.

  • really? cool

  • I think that shell do good as jane

  • when i heard this news i was very sad, Dakota Fanning should not play Jane, i think she will ruin the volturi, Jane is too good a character to be played by her, Jodelle Ferland should've been cast

  • Thank you. I agree, Jodelle is such a better actress. Team Jodelle

  • ewwy fuck that i dont want here in it, that wuld just ruin the whole movie.

  • I think she'd b good, shes looks sweet enough to play Jane.

  • haha i think she would play a good jane it matches her lol

  • i don't want dakota to be jane

  • I do not want her to be in the movie at All.

  • How would you know that Dakota wouldn't do a good job.You do realize that half of the cast don't make the same effect as their characters in the book. It's all makeup and acting ability. And in her what 15 years of life, she's done more than all of the actors in twilight combined. Not everyone thought Kristen Stewart could pull off Bella... but obviously they were all wrong. people should just not talk about the ability of amazing actors until they see how they do in the movie.

  • i think that jane should be... i don't know, more italian looking. but dakota could probably pull it off

  • somebody could tell me the name of this music please??

  • it sounds like Alizee, not sure about the title though

  • oh it's Alizée - J'ai Pas Vingt Ans

  • Comment removed

  • lol i dont see why not. she is a pretty good actress for the age of 14. I think she can probably pull it off.

  • she is 15

  • no she cant b jane

  • The real reason Dakota got chosen:

    watch?v=vy7CXM0daNI

  • i think she would be 'good' jane but i don't want anyone famous to play in twilight

    unknown actors are better

  • In my opinion, I don't see anything wrong with famous actors getting roles in twillight. They will have way more acting experience when it comes to different scenes just because of their experience on the big screen, and usually movies with unknown actors do not do aswell because the audience is not fimilar with their talents unlike dakota fanning who has done many great movies. But I understand where you are coming from also.

  • im sure she could pull it off because she is a good actress, but ya i pictured somone more italian looking, dark hair eyes and tan skin? and jane is from an italian group of vampires

  • Dakota is officially Jane.

  • I agree she is the perfect Jane

  • i read new moon a long time ago but, who's jane?

  • too old she

  • NO NO NO NO she should not be playing Jane

  • I think that dakota fanning is too old. Jane is shorter in mmy mind. And i cant see her trying to kill anyone. She doesnt have it in her. But who knows.

  • I still want Jodelle Ferland to play Jane.

  • She looks like Jane but keep in mind that Alec is her twin and it would be weird if they had two like 10 year olds on the Volturi guard, ya know

  • she is going to be perfect!!!!!!

  • lol mhmm :)

  • cuz in breaking dawn she says about how aro, caius, and marcus (idk if the spellings right but i don't feel like checking) have black cloaks, and then said how jane and alec and maybe a few others had almost black cloaks, and the cloaks would get lighter as they were lower in "rank". but you could be right, i dunno. and yeah, the movie will be good either wayy

  • well it all depends on how you read the sentence, "the body under the cloak..." because the way i read it i thought it was talking about the cloak. and i'm pretty sure when they describe alec, her twin, there isn't anything about dark skin. plus, the movie isn't 100% like the book, james wasn't supposed to have long blonde hair, and laurent is supposed to have "olive-toned" skin, and when i think of olive toned skin i don't think it's as dark as his is in the movie. oh well, i could be wrong

  • yeah seriously! i don't know why everyone thinks she has blonde hair...

    but i don't think she has dark skin, when she says "which was darker, almost black" i think she's talking about the cloak she wears

  • idk its a close call. When Bella described Jane she said she was as tiny as Alice. She was slim and androgynous. The only time Jane was referred to a child was when she smiles. "Jane smiled; the expression made her look like an angelic child" The book really don't get to much into detail about her. I think she will pull it off, just have to darken and shorten her hair and she'd be okay. Only thing I hope don't happen is they use Dakota for publicity for the movie..

  • she should totally play jane

  • hell no!

  • of course she's a amazingly good actress but new moon is just soo not her style!! sure the REAL twilighters all don't wanna see her in nm!!!! and btw I pictured jane much smaller and with a roundly face and espeacially with lightbrown hair till the shoulders!!!!

  • Uhm what the hell you guys, isn't Jane older than that? I was kinda hoping that they would keep the series more indie like the first, but better. If you throw in someone like Dakota fanning, or even Vanessa Hudgens (who was rumored to play leah) it'd would unbalance it, and I don't know. I just can't imagine her playing the part. I figured Jane to be older but if it happens, it happens, and I'll still watch it cuz I'm a Twilighter.

  • she would make a great jane. she is a lot better than all the other people they have been considering for jane too.

  • i was thinking of jane someone like the actress from harry potter "luna lovegood"

  • well i dont really think she is that pretty. they describe jane as young ,pretty, and like a little girl.

  • mmmm no .....

  • she would make a great renesme!!!!!!!!!!

  • I think she can do it very well

  • i cant picture her playing jane. ya she can act but jane causes pain and she looks/is wayyy too sweet to play the role. idk but thats my opinion.

  • yeah for sore she looks sweet but vamps are ment to look pretty/sweet s i think she will do well as jane

  • that's very true..

  • I think that Dakota Fanning would be fantastic as the role of Jane in New Moon! She's a great actress and makes an awesine appearance in all te other movies she's made! so why not?

  • I don't know. she can act, but i want someone who isn't known. It makes it more interesting and i want someone's dreams coming true. Someone who's like super excited about the books and actors......

  • well; i think, she's a nice little girl, and often she played the evil role of a girl in films, so why not jane in "new moon" ?

    i think, we couldn't say now, that she isn't evil enough because we haven't seen her in a vampire mask or something like that, or not?

  • i want jodelle ferland or bella thorne to be jane and they can have remy thorne for alec dakota sucks!

  • she sucks as jane! not scary! plus, people, i mean shes 14! Jane is described as young. shes way too tall!shes gonna make me barf if she becomes jane and im gonna scream like crazy!

  • i don't think she makes a good jane! she doesn't look evil enough.and i really don't like her that much anyway.she doesn't make a good jane!

  • i hate dakota she will ruin the great charcter of jane

  • i think she should be Jane in New Moon.

    It makes sense

  • If you don't want Dakota playing Jane in New Moon click my name and sign the petition for her NOT to play it!!

  • yea shed be okay but i wanted the person who plays bellatrix in harry potter to play jane

  • no way..!!...it's better to stick with unknown actors..)...in this way it will be more interesting

  • I think she's a good fit. I think Jane was described as being on the smaller side and I always thought of her as being short and young looking. She's supposed to look innocent and thus surprising when she shows how dangerous she really is. I think Dakota could do it.

  • she actually fits the description of jane so i think she would be good

  • No way!!!...she doesnt fit at all

  • I think she would be good.

  • i think she would be good for the part.

  • no shes not that pretty and a bit too young

  • shed be pretty good.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more