Free energy technology exists!But the powerfull Oil business won't alow common ppl to know this,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
Another name for a regulation is a LAW. The banks want a lawless environment where everything is legal, thus they can never get in trouble for what they do.
I like Mr. Grayson's idea of rewarding the smaller, responsible banks, and allowing the irrepsonsible banks TO be split up sold at fari market value on the open markets. The idea of rewarding predatory lending, mismanagement and downright irresponsiblity is completely corrupt. This was stated in a different video, not this one. The bailout fundamentally rewarded failure and cost all of us dearly.
Dean Baker is definitely a guy we want involved in discoveries or hearings such as this. He has been right on top of fall the financial and budget shenanigans and their probable and eventual effects for many years.
Too Big To Fail should be changed to: Too Stupid to Operate. Here is a list of stupid idiots:
1. Goldman Sachs
2. JP Morgan
3. Citigroup
4. Bank of America
5. AIG
6. Wells Fargo
7. American Express
They're so stupid that it will cost taxpayers $23.7 Trillion to fix their $1.4 Quadrillion Derivative mess. Congress gave Goldman Sachs TARP funds of $10 Billion. Although, they paid the TARP back, they still got $12.8 Billion via the AIG bailout. Congress gave AIG the money, AIG paid out.
bust them into smaller corps or you turn them into a monopoly like a utility.
You do want regulation but smart regulation... smart and government in the same sentence is an oxymoron..
any ideas?
If your idea is market forces be sure the incentive go the right way.. an assumption of long term interests was incorrect.. shorter term interests emerged.
reality starts as idea as we don't create what we can't imagine.
without fresh ideas the most plausible emergence is a stiff monopoly.
If there is no breakthrough innovative era, then our country will be in hard economic times. It is an endless cycle. Once we get out of this economic recession there will be another one waiting for us 5 years down the road. Our whole economic system is flawed and we need a new one.
You're right. We need to get government out of the business of social and economic planning. Central Planning has proven to be a flawed system, yet that's the exact "cure" they are proposing.
Central Planning and government intervention in the free market is what causes these artificial booms and busts. We need to stop this crazy cycle.
Stop congress from making laws that intervene with how business make business decision. This is the result of the CRA of 1995 forcing banks to make bad loans for political reasons
Labour Charter 1927, Grand Council of Fascism, article 9: State intervention in economic production may take place only where private initiative is lacking or is insufficient, or when are at stakes the political interest of the State. This intervention may take the form of control, encouragement or direct management.
Heres a rule for you to prevent any institution posing the risk of systemic collapse.
Remove the debt based fiat money system, money can only be backed by the total goods and services within the economy so it function is for the exchange of those goods and services.
Now any institution can become as big as it likes and will only effect itself when it collapses because their collapse will not effect money and thus no systematic damage.
Why are these people still beating about the bush..?
How about services lost when business fail? the gap between services lost and money?
perhaps a reservoir of commodities that are traded for the extra money?
people that lost their jobs will need income.. There's direct welfare/unemployment(not a fill) or investments like education and research as better alts. as they magnify inputs; smarter then handouts.. they could be a fill counted as services seamlessly absorbing personnel till there's room in the market.
Practically every "too big to fail" U.S. bank would have failed recently had the Federal Reserve not been able to steal $hundreds of billions$ from our U.S. Treasury to give to those banks and its 12 member private banks.
National debt (public debt) is now $11.3 trillion.
Rep. Grayson seems very keen on the idea that there should or could be some strict set of rules about something very complex like deciding if an organization is too big to fail. But the history of artificial intelligence teaches us that making sets of rules to determine complex things is much harder than we thought. Where are the home-help robots we were so confidently promised in the 60's? Sets of rules should only be used as guidance in complex issues.
I am sick of governmenting. All this private property fixing is unconstitutional. Go fix Freddie and Fannie, Social Security and Medicare. That's the systemic risk you should be worrying about.
what about the regs. that where in place until clinton got rid of them in the 90's. what about investigations, and jailing the wrong do'ers. to set examples. where are the people in goverment with the guts to take the fight to them, in the future when everyone does get this figured out they will remember the fighters.
My personal opinion is that the bailouts have been the biggest fraud in the history of the world. Billions and billions that flow to organizations to pay for bad/criminal decisions and then flow to other organizations are untracable (stolen). When the dollar collapses, these people will be in good shape since this money will have been used to acquire real assets and ensure their wealth.
Glad to see Simon Johnson there, he seems to be somebody who actually wants to help sort this mess out. If only you had more than 5 minutes with them :/
I agree with you that Simon Johnson seems like a reasonable man. We will never really solve the banking problems without ending the Federal Reserve. I think that if we did an audit of the Fed you would see huge corruption to the point if leaked would lead to pitchforks in the streets when people come the realization how we have been stolen from off of the hardworking backs of the American people. I appreciate what Alan is trying to do. We have about 4 or so real congressmen in Washington.
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy technology exists!But the powerfull Oil business won't alow common ppl to know this,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
intermitrj 1 year ago
Nationalize the banks.
MrSalamander7 2 years ago
@MrSalamander7
they already are...
savemyplaylist 2 years ago
*Duh Duh Dum Chsh*
MrSalamander7 2 years ago
Another name for a regulation is a LAW. The banks want a lawless environment where everything is legal, thus they can never get in trouble for what they do.
monkeyman1140 2 years ago 4
I like Mr. Grayson's idea of rewarding the smaller, responsible banks, and allowing the irrepsonsible banks TO be split up sold at fari market value on the open markets. The idea of rewarding predatory lending, mismanagement and downright irresponsiblity is completely corrupt. This was stated in a different video, not this one. The bailout fundamentally rewarded failure and cost all of us dearly.
kmhutter 2 years ago 12
Dean Baker is definitely a guy we want involved in discoveries or hearings such as this. He has been right on top of fall the financial and budget shenanigans and their probable and eventual effects for many years.
shortist2003 2 years ago
Too Big To Fail should be changed to: Too Stupid to Operate. Here is a list of stupid idiots:
1. Goldman Sachs
2. JP Morgan
3. Citigroup
4. Bank of America
5. AIG
6. Wells Fargo
7. American Express
They're so stupid that it will cost taxpayers $23.7 Trillion to fix their $1.4 Quadrillion Derivative mess. Congress gave Goldman Sachs TARP funds of $10 Billion. Although, they paid the TARP back, they still got $12.8 Billion via the AIG bailout. Congress gave AIG the money, AIG paid out.
samlaunch 2 years ago 7
Keyseyian liars.
wellingtonian 2 years ago
bust them into smaller corps or you turn them into a monopoly like a utility.
You do want regulation but smart regulation... smart and government in the same sentence is an oxymoron..
any ideas?
If your idea is market forces be sure the incentive go the right way.. an assumption of long term interests was incorrect.. shorter term interests emerged.
reality starts as idea as we don't create what we can't imagine.
without fresh ideas the most plausible emergence is a stiff monopoly.
abram730 2 years ago 2
As I understand it regulated banks can only leverage to 9:1
city group was at something like 39:1..
Central banks in 3rd world countries have collapsed entire countries doing things like that...
Regulation is a must but what kind?
The quick way is to slap regular banking reg on them and pop them into the FED.. It's that happening?
abram730 2 years ago
Too big to fail? Sounds like a monopoly.
fatmoleman 2 years ago 2
Or one in the making assisted by the Federal Reserve.
bweazel 2 years ago
If there is no breakthrough innovative era, then our country will be in hard economic times. It is an endless cycle. Once we get out of this economic recession there will be another one waiting for us 5 years down the road. Our whole economic system is flawed and we need a new one.
monetarydemise 2 years ago
You're right. We need to get government out of the business of social and economic planning. Central Planning has proven to be a flawed system, yet that's the exact "cure" they are proposing.
Central Planning and government intervention in the free market is what causes these artificial booms and busts. We need to stop this crazy cycle.
SugarMonkey528 2 years ago
Stop congress from making laws that intervene with how business make business decision. This is the result of the CRA of 1995 forcing banks to make bad loans for political reasons
Labour Charter 1927, Grand Council of Fascism, article 9: State intervention in economic production may take place only where private initiative is lacking or is insufficient, or when are at stakes the political interest of the State. This intervention may take the form of control, encouragement or direct management.
BrainDeadRepublican 2 years ago
Here's a rule, how about focusing on people and the environment.
liuv83 2 years ago
Heres a rule for you to prevent any institution posing the risk of systemic collapse.
Remove the debt based fiat money system, money can only be backed by the total goods and services within the economy so it function is for the exchange of those goods and services.
Now any institution can become as big as it likes and will only effect itself when it collapses because their collapse will not effect money and thus no systematic damage.
Why are these people still beating about the bush..?
Danster82 2 years ago 2
Good one Danster.
How about services lost when business fail? the gap between services lost and money?
perhaps a reservoir of commodities that are traded for the extra money?
people that lost their jobs will need income.. There's direct welfare/unemployment(not a fill) or investments like education and research as better alts. as they magnify inputs; smarter then handouts.. they could be a fill counted as services seamlessly absorbing personnel till there's room in the market.
abram730 2 years ago
Yeah definitely.
In the end there is no perfect system but then anything will do over this system which couldn't be further from perfect if it tried.
Danster82 2 years ago
Practically every "too big to fail" U.S. bank would have failed recently had the Federal Reserve not been able to steal $hundreds of billions$ from our U.S. Treasury to give to those banks and its 12 member private banks.
National debt (public debt) is now $11.3 trillion.
mediumdz 2 years ago
Rep. Grayson seems very keen on the idea that there should or could be some strict set of rules about something very complex like deciding if an organization is too big to fail. But the history of artificial intelligence teaches us that making sets of rules to determine complex things is much harder than we thought. Where are the home-help robots we were so confidently promised in the 60's? Sets of rules should only be used as guidance in complex issues.
mickanomics-blogspot-com
bigmick142 2 years ago
'Too big to fail' = too big to exist. Thank you, Mr. Grayson, for trying to start that conversation.
CBHobart 2 years ago 2
Is Sachs serious?
An FDIC for Wall Street?
Yeah, like we want the government insuring every move they make. That won't make Wall Street risky at all!
MooseOfReason 2 years ago
Comment removed
BlueSkies360 2 years ago
I am sick of governmenting. All this private property fixing is unconstitutional. Go fix Freddie and Fannie, Social Security and Medicare. That's the systemic risk you should be worrying about.
BlueSkies360 2 years ago
what about the regs. that where in place until clinton got rid of them in the 90's. what about investigations, and jailing the wrong do'ers. to set examples. where are the people in goverment with the guts to take the fight to them, in the future when everyone does get this figured out they will remember the fighters.
bossduff 2 years ago
If congress makes legislation making arson legal, you can't arrest people for burning down buildings.
mongobobo 2 years ago
My personal opinion is that the bailouts have been the biggest fraud in the history of the world. Billions and billions that flow to organizations to pay for bad/criminal decisions and then flow to other organizations are untracable (stolen). When the dollar collapses, these people will be in good shape since this money will have been used to acquire real assets and ensure their wealth.
trime1851 2 years ago 4
Glad to see Simon Johnson there, he seems to be somebody who actually wants to help sort this mess out. If only you had more than 5 minutes with them :/
ItalicBold 2 years ago
I agree with you that Simon Johnson seems like a reasonable man. We will never really solve the banking problems without ending the Federal Reserve. I think that if we did an audit of the Fed you would see huge corruption to the point if leaked would lead to pitchforks in the streets when people come the realization how we have been stolen from off of the hardworking backs of the American people. I appreciate what Alan is trying to do. We have about 4 or so real congressmen in Washington.
cotullaguy 2 years ago