Our Singapore does not belong to the lee & lee family how can one family hold on to power for so long almost 50 years....before we know it they will become the royal family of Singapore are we going to let them rule us for another 50 years
Look at that fucking shirt mann.. can't it say something to the effect of Singapore Must Change or ilLEEgalize Lee or something. No one in that room is wearing that shirt you know why? Because it fucking makes you look nothing more than a whiner, that's why
is there no more privacy in singapore? are these people from censorship board out of their minds claiming they are the ones who decide what justice is all about in si ngapore? what right do they have to ask anyone to surrender their private videos viewed in private?
this videos confirms the police state of singapore and that there enough running dogs to do the biddings of the master dog.
shows how sick singapore authorities can be.......
at his age, is mm lky tested for his mental health for his high salaried job like all aged american presidents?
this video shows the paranoid society that lky has built with his power crazy and high-handed psychotic bureaucrats.
the racial composition of the investigating officials in this video and the threats of police actions are used and politicised when opposition parties are involved in investigations in the police state.
freedom of speech never exists in singapore. They tried..we tried... a place for total. state, control by Lee, gaining taxes, setting up casinos, they earn money like a business....stirring up the state, creating internal chaos.. etc.
Funny. I have had no problem with freedom of expressing anything. It's when you wish to make a grandstanding statement of "freedom" that you run into issues. In *any* country, my friend. Including the US.
Singapore is not China, Hong Kong or Taiwan. "华人经济发展,靠的是华人的勤劳和智慧?" Your Chinese chauvinistic view of how Singapore is governed shows that you have no respect for the other cultures and races in Singapore. You're either a new immigrant hiding behind your keyboard politics or you're no Singaporean to begin with.
your claims are based on nothing but your ego spawned by your beliving that you are intellectually superior to others.
wise up conformist, because progress comes from skeptism. if you were so "smart" as to rebut everyone who voices their doubts, then i would say that you are truly dumb, or to quote your remarkable comeback on my channel, a "Stupid ass".
Progress comes from incrementalism through experiences, skepticism is just a thought progress. What are you trying to prove by making such generalization as calling others "conformist"? What kind of policy making experiences that you've contributed to even give you the rights to judge others? You're truly a stupid ass!
"Incrementalism through experience is pointless without a correct direction."
Incremental changes are evident from urban planing (Master plan and DGPs), IT (information Road map), Health care and eduction (Library 2010). Just some of the thousands of successes in incremental changes. What's wrong with them?
Are you too stupid and dumb that you don't know how to explain yourself beyond making such useless accusations. Or are you just blindly trying to follow the rules of SDP? Stupid.
Hey Stupid, still on 'skeptism'? A 'skeptic' who fails to articulate his points or act out his ideas are just shooting blanks. That is is how a cynic works, he believes he is skeptical but in actual fact he waste his life because of his scornful outlooks. And you know what they said about the cynic? Nobody would listen to one. A good example of such a representative: Chee Soon Juan and his sdp.
are you lamenting because i just opened a can of whoop ass all over you?
you don't have to try, i win, you lose.
I won't even touch on your arguments, they're those even a 3 year old can make, and an utter waste of my time.
You've got nothing to prove to me, i don't represent SDP. You are the "stupid ass" for wasting time on me.
Oh and check your grammar, interestingly you might find it quite similar to that of little kids. Besides, your mind functions exactly like that of one.
Of course you win, they have been conferring the title of ultimate stupidity on you since your preschool days, which was like what? 2 years ago? Don't worry no one would fight you on that. Of this HONOR, you've won big time. Stupid ass.
I'm not surprised you ignored whatever I said and continued on with your rant on stupidity. It shows a sheer lack of ability to comprehend on your part.
After all, you are the epitome of stupidity. please, you bestow your own attributes onto myself too readily, I am undeserving.
You dont get it do you? If you have been more lucid and less irrelevant, this entire argument would not have been evolved into a showcase of your stupidity. Your contradictions and lack of coherence in thoughts and intelligence are your downfall. If you want to win, make sure you know what you are achieving. Instead of copying directly from some comic book scripts, use your brain for once. Pathetic dumb loser.
Run out of copying materials? You can always leech on what I said about you, at least now you are copying from a master instead of some cheap comic scripts.
Don't fret, the title of ultimate stupidity is still yours. Few more of such remarks and you may even be the winner of the stupidest dumb ass under a single Utube channel.
provincial of you to call me a "copy cat", when i'm merely redirecting a misguided truth.
i wouldn't blame you though- only little kids use terms like "copycat". i've been deliberately making nonsensical remaks for the past few replies. its amusing how you even bother to reply to them. it shows how mature you really are.
yes, i enjoy irking you, the little peevish kid who can't take it lying down.
Don't worry I'm enjoying every bits of your nonsense self. Especially when you you are so ready to lap up to what I said with the most irrelevant terms for retorts. It would be more fun if you've any intelligence or imagination to go with them. I guess I will just have to go with the inferior copying stuff you produce for the time being. Stupid ass.
That is hilarious. You have shown you are incapable of any points of views, what truth? Until now you still haven't explain your stand regarding the video. So you are here to be called dumb? Dumb ass.
i don't support the SDP- i'm not a politics fanatic like you are. i don't need to resort to personal insults to get my point across- obviously we know who is the one lacking in intelligence here, substituting his "arguments" with vitriolic comments. how barbaric.
"i don't need to resort to personal insults to get my point across-"?????
You came to my profile page and left unexplained terms like "your mother" and "conformist", totally unprovoked and clearly meant to be insults. In fact, you have put new twists to "personal insults" which have just backfire right into your face. Ironic, yes not controversial. Get it???
What the matter? Too stupid to leave the backdoor open. Stupid ass.
What I just did are just pure sarcasm and nothing else. You provoked this argument but couldn't finish it with half an ounce of wit and decided to cry foul. Your comments are filled with inappropriate terms like, "controversial", "vitriolic", "barbaric". My guess is you googled these without truly understand their meanings. Pathetic and dumb.
Don't I then reserve every right to call you a conformist?...'
A sarcasm has to be executed with finesse to be effective. Looking at your juvenile attempt to produce one, I suggest in between your nappy change, get "your mother" to advance education. It's time to join your playmates. At least now they are learning how to crawl. What more? Given time, you may learn how to make sense from that big gap on your face too. Stupid.
"Oh..i forgot i cannot, because there is limited freedom of speech in our "democratic" nation.
Controversial isn't it, this very party you support?"
The term to use here is "ironic" not "Controversial". Google for both terms if you do not understand their usages and meanings. I would suggest a good old fashion dictionary but this is not suitable for a stupid ass as in this case.
It is political and it is not impartial. I do not know if those who defended the mda have watched it or not. Maybe they are simply disgusted by the SDP attitudes towards juniors officers. And to call others "PAP internet brigade" just because they've differing political stands from yours just goes to show your immaturity level here.
the video merely states facts, eg. the media control, fact that SPH and MediaCorp are govt-controlled, that oppostition members have been and are still being supressed by the PAP, etc. Now who's the one who has not watched the video?
Doesn't it bother anyone that the 2 current opposition MPs' views are totally omitted in "One Nation"? It is jolly well to argue for the need of different views as and when it suits the sdp. There is nothing balance abt "One Nation". It is a political propaganda from the sdp perspective.
"oppostition members have been and are still being suppressed by the PAP". The self-appointed representative of all opposition parties in SDP decided that our current Opposition MPs views don't count. In parliament, we see their debates on tv. How are they being suppressed?
SPH is a listed company. Meaning anyone can become shareholders unlike many western medias that are owned by private individuals. What so discriminating about that fact? If there is impropriety, then charge and sue these entities. The problem is sdp has no evidences. All there is are insinuations.
The law applies to all. Isn't that what Constitutional rights are all about: Equal treatment for everyone? The Film Act is a piece of legislation that applies in this case and the mda pple are there to do just that. What God given right does the SDP has to override it? Not commercial film? Then why charged for the viewing?
The law has been unfair to the SDP obviously. PAP contesting politicians were seen in a polling station during election time. No contesting politician is supposed to be within a radius from such a station. Yet our court defended the PAP.
In the station or how far from the station? Which law? Since we're at it, sdp might as well give us ur answers. I think many of us would like to examine this bit of info for ourselves.
The way the SDP acted in the video is nothing short of disgraceful. Why heckle some poor junior censorship board officials? Think it drives home a point? Or did the play into the hands of the authorities (again!) - and these are "intelligent & well-educated" opposition members? Well spoken at least, but IMHO not at all politically savvy. Or mature, for that matter.
at 3:12 "Can.. Can we have the fee-lem title that is screeing right now?" hahhahahaha... what sort of english is this for a civil servant? hhahhahahaa...
Movies shown in the cinema have to go through mda for classifications under the Film Act. I will think that if you need to pay to attend a viewing of a movie, it should not be considered a private event, definitely not the same as weddings. If we pay to see shows in cinemas and the films have to go through classifications through mds, what made this particular movie exceptional? If you argue that it is by invitations only, so are movie premieres.
THE EXPATS SHOULD BE NICE TO SINGAPOREANS. I love my Chinese, Malay and Indian brothers and sisters. Unfortunately, the 'white' expats spit on all of us. Hey expats, you guys can live in S'pore...no prob...but be nice to us asians. I mean it. I'm fine with oppositions and PAP, but I can NO longer take the expats. WHITEs, be nice to us. Please. If not, there might be a riot. This is no longer the 1900s where you 'whites' are colonial animals. Leave the Chinese, Malay and Indians alone. RESPECT
wow, you made that comment more than a month ago, i reply, and you reply back within a few minutes? Are you really a person, or just an "organization"? :) Anyways !
@4.08mins, when asked by SDP members on obection of the contents of the film, she admitted on not knowing the contents??!!! How ironic can that be? If MDA do not know what is the contents, then on what grounds do they reject it?
And that shows we are in an undemocratic society where we, d ppl, have no rights to clarify our views on the govt. That is just like under a dictatorial state. But for once, I agree on your reasons for NS.
After watching this video and listening to their court proceedings, the SDP seems more concerned with their personal agenda of fair campaigning rather than coming up with better policies for the sg ppl.
Seriously, who wud care abt the past history of Singapore? They are more concerned with the current state of the country and it's economy. The only thing they wanna change are SOME regulations they feel uncomfortable.
Now I know that you are still a boy, not yet a man. You do not know the difference of right and wrong. Ask your parents, do they like the goverment? How's the pain is like?
Wat pain are u talking abt? Healthcare is taken care of, there are no riots, the society is peaceful and economy is strong.. this is wat people really want. They are not interested in public demonstrations which have a high chance of rioting due to ppl's emotions.
The pain of struggling economically, financially and especially emotionally? Are you married? Do you have a family? or do you have a job? does it secure you right to the end? Do you pay taxes? Do you know where do taxpayers money go to? Ask yourself, If you do not have the answer, then ask around...
Struggling economically, finanacially and emotionally is what everyone in the world faces... tell me who doesn't?
Job security is the same for everyone else in a free market economy unless it's a communist state of the past..
Taxpayers money are used to invest by the govt overseas and etc. I feel it's a necessary move to sustain the economic strength and reserves of this nation totally dependent only on human capital.
Are you very sure about that? I think you were brought up in a family of selfish, corrupted Singaporeans who don't know what is freedom and democracy. Who only knows MONEY!!! GREEDY PIGS!!
@curiousboy It's NS. Of course it serves only the country's interests and not the individual. That's a given and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. What I do have a problem with is that it is mandatory. Whether to serve in the military should be voluntary and a personal decision. If Singaporeans are forced to serve, I don't think they'll be as effective in battle because of being of poor government treatment.
There is a link. She's firstly suggesting that the authorities are being hypocritical in accepting private video screenings (like in weddings in private parties) without the need for censorship procedures, and yet picking on them in this situation. Secondly, she's trying to dig the truth out of the lying MDA officer - that the MDA is picking on them not because of the censorship issue itself, but because of the 'sensitivity' of their video content.
I think you have a very low IQ. What they are refering to is about the approval by MDA. You see, if there is a wedding dinner going on, and the video(usually played by the couples-if u r married, u might understand)is rolling without the MDA license, will they crash it too?You see the law is that you need license to screen it to publicly to large crowds, even if it is a private affair like a wedding dinner..get it??
do u need the MDA to pamper ur ass everytime?...why?..Singaporean has the RIGHTS to see wat they want to see their humans..humans that are being thought-controlled...mda aint got shit on these pple who just wanna put out the truth! and muthafckas who gets blind and doesnt want to see the truth are nothing better than shitholes
Surprised that the MDA folks were not quick enough to react with the various arguements, notably the one on the "wedding dinner", which is an obvious diversion. The law applies when the technicalities are involved but we should also look at the broad context to avoid unnecessary time and resources wastage.
The SDP people are real cocky i gotta say..i wouldn't want them to govern my country! They kept saying about wedding dinners,but is it a wedding dinner?no? but i gotta say the MDA people are simply not shrewd enough to handle such cocky people/weidos.
Use your brains, they are trying to tell the truth to the people! So if the government lies to you your okay about it? And someone try telling the truth through a legal way is wrong? your obviously bias
hahaha... Sadly, these officers are not equiped to handle the scenarios. The lady and the ohers are probably more exposed to 'harassment' and better prepared.
This is ridiculous... if social security was the issue, then there wouldn't be any private functions or screenings. MDA might as well just start going from functions to functions stopping everyone!
i'm just saying that basically politics evolved into democracy so that people's rights are taken care of..maybe trying to win the people's trust wld b a better way to start off by showing ur own qualities as a party..rather than discrediting ur opponents
i think the opposition..especially sdp needs to realign their own strategies..being the opposition shld be abt helping to fine tune the political system in the country and contribute..not making a nuisance of themselves..some of their acts if u let them remain might cause more problems for their own image rather than fighting for the people..it seems that over the years they're on the road of avenging their own "wrongs"..they probably cld learn a bit from Anwar and his coalition
Yes indeed, this film is rather educational and gives an alternate perspective to what really happened in Singapore instead of that one sided version we get from history textbooks. And what armyboy24 said is correct, they're twisting the law in a way that the Chees are breaking it, in directly. It's a so called "threat to internal security" i think
Well, put it another view, if let's say if the video being shown in the private screening, involves contents (e.g: terrorism-related) that would be a major security threat to Singapore, would the MDA & police be allowed to barge in and investigate? Of cuz, how would the MDA know the contents? Precisely becuz they dunno e content, that's why they requested the person in charge to let them in to investigate. As usual, the Chees just enjoy being the clowns of Singapore, just second to Steven Lim.
That's insane... do you need to submit what u want to view in the private party....?? lots ppl are doing presentation in party and i believe that ppl don't need to ask permission...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
these guys seems to be selling a lot of 'merchandize' in a so called 'private' event. seriously, grow up people, these people just want to make quick money. idiots.
this video, indeed educates/informs us (mostly the Gen Ys) on the political arena/issues in Singapore.
That aside, with the Internet and inherent power of viral distribution of content online. Controlling the mainstream media will soon no longer be feasible.
As a person who had admired Singapore for many years following my first visit there in 1971 I have become totally disillusioned by the draconian laws enacted and applied by the Singapore PAP Government that inhibit what would be regarded as very mild dissidence to the ruling powers in democracies. If I was in Singapore and conducted a private screening of such a DVD in my hotel room to invited guests, would the MDA and police invade my room?
Would it be a private screening if you have to pay for it? What so draconian about screening videos for classifications which is what mda do? It seems to me sdp intention is to show the video to pple who are not just personal friends and relatives. Shouldn't the video in questions be treated like commercial films then?
I just think that we are going on a slow transition towards democracy. Of cos in this instance it kinda looked like a step backward. until the lee dynasty is over and some good opposition comes along, i dont tink most of us could survive without a govt tellin us wat to do when PAP disappear overnight. anybody tot tis could very well be a ploy of the opposition to attract attention, dey could hv ratted on themselves n put up a show if u noe wat im toking about.
Fuck1n6 cheebye MDA, my blood is boiling watching those fu3kers! We must stand up and be counted agst these cronies. Grow up Singapore We need to mature! "Obstructing justice" LOL or she meant objecting PAP??
I really hope that LKY gets a stroke on nomination day for 2011 elections... i dont want him to die... i want him to lee his party fall in his lifetime.
Revolution! get up stand up stand for your rights!
dextroify 8 months ago
Our Singapore does not belong to the lee & lee family how can one family hold on to power for so long almost 50 years....before we know it they will become the royal family of Singapore are we going to let them rule us for another 50 years
wolfglare 9 months ago
pap is very dangerous to singaporeans with their pap abuses....
alyuful 9 months ago
End the one familee rule in Singapore.
JansenCassidy 9 months ago
Look at that fucking shirt mann.. can't it say something to the effect of Singapore Must Change or ilLEEgalize Lee or something. No one in that room is wearing that shirt you know why? Because it fucking makes you look nothing more than a whiner, that's why
wteo340 9 months ago
unbelievable!
jo0770 9 months ago
is there no more privacy in singapore? are these people from censorship board out of their minds claiming they are the ones who decide what justice is all about in si ngapore? what right do they have to ask anyone to surrender their private videos viewed in private?
this videos confirms the police state of singapore and that there enough running dogs to do the biddings of the master dog.
shows how sick singapore authorities can be.......
alyuful 1 year ago
at his age, is mm lky tested for his mental health for his high salaried job like all aged american presidents?
this video shows the paranoid society that lky has built with his power crazy and high-handed psychotic bureaucrats.
the racial composition of the investigating officials in this video and the threats of police actions are used and politicised when opposition parties are involved in investigations in the police state.
YES,YES YES
screen the singapore realities in YOUTUBE!
hallwy3 1 year ago
the fella laughing from 5:46....wth .... u think this is a joke ??
BornWildz 2 years ago
Why is it called "private screening" if they need to ask permission.This does not make sense
duperman172 2 years ago
if i were there i willdefinately wack the guy holding the camer. he is a fucking gay.
chakdesavin 2 years ago 3
singaporeans have to stop talking and start fighting if thats the only way we can get the message thru their numb skulls
idunnosia 2 years ago
guys..get a room man
musaaaaaaa 2 years ago
freedom of speech never exists in singapore. They tried..we tried... a place for total. state, control by Lee, gaining taxes, setting up casinos, they earn money like a business....stirring up the state, creating internal chaos.. etc.
yuklun 2 years ago
Funny. I have had no problem with freedom of expressing anything. It's when you wish to make a grandstanding statement of "freedom" that you run into issues. In *any* country, my friend. Including the US.
NearlyNubile 2 years ago
Utterly disgusting!!! What a police state my home-country had became...
When can the bastard lky die???????
hotshibuya 2 years ago
Singapore is not China, Hong Kong or Taiwan. "华人经济发展,靠的是华人的勤劳和智慧?" Your Chinese chauvinistic view of how Singapore is governed shows that you have no respect for the other cultures and races in Singapore. You're either a new immigrant hiding behind your keyboard politics or you're no Singaporean to begin with.
joos0202 2 years ago 2
your claims are based on nothing but your ego spawned by your beliving that you are intellectually superior to others.
wise up conformist, because progress comes from skeptism. if you were so "smart" as to rebut everyone who voices their doubts, then i would say that you are truly dumb, or to quote your remarkable comeback on my channel, a "Stupid ass".
chiefboy 2 years ago
Progress comes from incrementalism through experiences, skepticism is just a thought progress. What are you trying to prove by making such generalization as calling others "conformist"? What kind of policy making experiences that you've contributed to even give you the rights to judge others? You're truly a stupid ass!
joos0202 2 years ago
Your progress you mention, unfortunately, points in the wrong direction. Are you telling me that our society that we live in today is perfect?
Incrementalism through experience is pointless without a correct direction.
What we truly need is healthy skepticism to shift "progress" into the right direction. The stupid ass is the one who will discredit skepticism.
chiefboy 2 years ago
"Incrementalism through experience is pointless without a correct direction."
Incremental changes are evident from urban planing (Master plan and DGPs), IT (information Road map), Health care and eduction (Library 2010). Just some of the thousands of successes in incremental changes. What's wrong with them?
Are you too stupid and dumb that you don't know how to explain yourself beyond making such useless accusations. Or are you just blindly trying to follow the rules of SDP? Stupid.
joos0202 2 years ago
Hey Stupid, still on 'skeptism'? A 'skeptic' who fails to articulate his points or act out his ideas are just shooting blanks. That is is how a cynic works, he believes he is skeptical but in actual fact he waste his life because of his scornful outlooks. And you know what they said about the cynic? Nobody would listen to one. A good example of such a representative: Chee Soon Juan and his sdp.
joos0202 2 years ago
Stupid ass a.k.a chiefboy, the part about the skeptic? It's not you. You are not a skeptic, you are just plain dumb.
joos0202 2 years ago
calling me plain dumb/stupid is just as good as me calling you a conformist. you degrade yourself then.
it is not wrong to call pap's policies controversial.
obviously trying to hard to prove that i'm always wrong, trying too hard to prove that you are right.
if you cast doubt on every thing i say, you're a cynic yourself.
chiefboy 2 years ago
What kind of dumb ass will draw a parallel between "being dumb/stupid" and "being a conformist"? You have just discredit yourself again. Stupid ass.
joos0202 2 years ago
Why?
are you lamenting because i just opened a can of whoop ass all over you?
you don't have to try, i win, you lose.
I won't even touch on your arguments, they're those even a 3 year old can make, and an utter waste of my time.
You've got nothing to prove to me, i don't represent SDP. You are the "stupid ass" for wasting time on me.
Oh and check your grammar, interestingly you might find it quite similar to that of little kids. Besides, your mind functions exactly like that of one.
chiefboy 2 years ago
Of course you win, they have been conferring the title of ultimate stupidity on you since your preschool days, which was like what? 2 years ago? Don't worry no one would fight you on that. Of this HONOR, you've won big time. Stupid ass.
joos0202 2 years ago
I'm not surprised you ignored whatever I said and continued on with your rant on stupidity. It shows a sheer lack of ability to comprehend on your part.
After all, you are the epitome of stupidity. please, you bestow your own attributes onto myself too readily, I am undeserving.
chiefboy 2 years ago
You dont get it do you? If you have been more lucid and less irrelevant, this entire argument would not have been evolved into a showcase of your stupidity. Your contradictions and lack of coherence in thoughts and intelligence are your downfall. If you want to win, make sure you know what you are achieving. Instead of copying directly from some comic book scripts, use your brain for once. Pathetic dumb loser.
joos0202 2 years ago
There, again we see a repeat of what I've just mentioned.
Tsk tsk, you never learn do you?
Oh, and yes, I win.
chiefboy 2 years ago
Run out of copying materials? You can always leech on what I said about you, at least now you are copying from a master instead of some cheap comic scripts.
Don't fret, the title of ultimate stupidity is still yours. Few more of such remarks and you may even be the winner of the stupidest dumb ass under a single Utube channel.
Pathetic dumb ass of a copycat.
joos0202 2 years ago
provincial of you to call me a "copy cat", when i'm merely redirecting a misguided truth.
i wouldn't blame you though- only little kids use terms like "copycat". i've been deliberately making nonsensical remaks for the past few replies. its amusing how you even bother to reply to them. it shows how mature you really are.
yes, i enjoy irking you, the little peevish kid who can't take it lying down.
chiefboy 2 years ago
Don't worry I'm enjoying every bits of your nonsense self. Especially when you you are so ready to lap up to what I said with the most irrelevant terms for retorts. It would be more fun if you've any intelligence or imagination to go with them. I guess I will just have to go with the inferior copying stuff you produce for the time being. Stupid ass.
joos0202 2 years ago
"redirecting a misguided truth."
That is hilarious. You have shown you are incapable of any points of views, what truth? Until now you still haven't explain your stand regarding the video. So you are here to be called dumb? Dumb ass.
joos0202 2 years ago
im not here for the video. i'm only here to reply to you.
chiefboy 2 years ago
i don't support the SDP- i'm not a politics fanatic like you are. i don't need to resort to personal insults to get my point across- obviously we know who is the one lacking in intelligence here, substituting his "arguments" with vitriolic comments. how barbaric.
you need to rethink your life.
OWNED.
chiefboy 2 years ago
"i don't need to resort to personal insults to get my point across-"?????
You came to my profile page and left unexplained terms like "your mother" and "conformist", totally unprovoked and clearly meant to be insults. In fact, you have put new twists to "personal insults" which have just backfire right into your face. Ironic, yes not controversial. Get it???
What the matter? Too stupid to leave the backdoor open. Stupid ass.
joos0202 2 years ago
What I just did are just pure sarcasm and nothing else. You provoked this argument but couldn't finish it with half an ounce of wit and decided to cry foul. Your comments are filled with inappropriate terms like, "controversial", "vitriolic", "barbaric". My guess is you googled these without truly understand their meanings. Pathetic and dumb.
joos0202 2 years ago
The party you support promotes "democracy".
Don't I then reserve every right to call you a conformist?
Oh..i forgot i cannot, because there is limited freedom of speech in our "democratic" nation.
Controversial isn't it, this very party you support?
One more thing, I thought i'd point out - it's "You truly are a stupid ass".
I believe we know who the stupid ass is now. Hahaha.
chiefboy 2 years ago
'The party you support promotes "democracy".
Don't I then reserve every right to call you a conformist?...'
A sarcasm has to be executed with finesse to be effective. Looking at your juvenile attempt to produce one, I suggest in between your nappy change, get "your mother" to advance education. It's time to join your playmates. At least now they are learning how to crawl. What more? Given time, you may learn how to make sense from that big gap on your face too. Stupid.
joos0202 2 years ago
"Oh..i forgot i cannot, because there is limited freedom of speech in our "democratic" nation.
Controversial isn't it, this very party you support?"
The term to use here is "ironic" not "Controversial". Google for both terms if you do not understand their usages and meanings. I would suggest a good old fashion dictionary but this is not suitable for a stupid ass as in this case.
joos0202 2 years ago
Yes, a political propaganda is different from a wedding dinner.
But why so anxoius when it's a political video?
It would not be surprising if these staunch defenders turn out to be part of "PAP internet brigade".
Shameless. Disgusting.
sgcommoner 2 years ago
It is political and it is not impartial. I do not know if those who defended the mda have watched it or not. Maybe they are simply disgusted by the SDP attitudes towards juniors officers. And to call others "PAP internet brigade" just because they've differing political stands from yours just goes to show your immaturity level here.
joos0202 2 years ago
the video merely states facts, eg. the media control, fact that SPH and MediaCorp are govt-controlled, that oppostition members have been and are still being supressed by the PAP, etc. Now who's the one who has not watched the video?
sgcommoner 2 years ago
Doesn't it bother anyone that the 2 current opposition MPs' views are totally omitted in "One Nation"? It is jolly well to argue for the need of different views as and when it suits the sdp. There is nothing balance abt "One Nation". It is a political propaganda from the sdp perspective.
joos0202 2 years ago
"oppostition members have been and are still being suppressed by the PAP". The self-appointed representative of all opposition parties in SDP decided that our current Opposition MPs views don't count. In parliament, we see their debates on tv. How are they being suppressed?
joos0202 2 years ago
SPH is a listed company. Meaning anyone can become shareholders unlike many western medias that are owned by private individuals. What so discriminating about that fact? If there is impropriety, then charge and sue these entities. The problem is sdp has no evidences. All there is are insinuations.
joos0202 2 years ago
It "might have been illegal", yes.
But what's with the profuse defence below of this kind of enforcement which infringes on the constitutional right to freedom of expression?
Violation of the Constitution is itself illegal.
sgcommoner 2 years ago
The law applies to all. Isn't that what Constitutional rights are all about: Equal treatment for everyone? The Film Act is a piece of legislation that applies in this case and the mda pple are there to do just that. What God given right does the SDP has to override it? Not commercial film? Then why charged for the viewing?
joos0202 2 years ago
The law has been unfair to the SDP obviously. PAP contesting politicians were seen in a polling station during election time. No contesting politician is supposed to be within a radius from such a station. Yet our court defended the PAP.
sgcommoner 2 years ago
In the station or how far from the station? Which law? Since we're at it, sdp might as well give us ur answers. I think many of us would like to examine this bit of info for ourselves.
joos0202 2 years ago
lol at idiots trying to compare wedding dinner videos to political propaganda video.
poor MDA representative.
shame on the SDP. disgusting.
spirawase 2 years ago
The way the SDP acted in the video is nothing short of disgraceful. Why heckle some poor junior censorship board officials? Think it drives home a point? Or did the play into the hands of the authorities (again!) - and these are "intelligent & well-educated" opposition members? Well spoken at least, but IMHO not at all politically savvy. Or mature, for that matter.
ttlglass 2 years ago
at 3:12 "Can.. Can we have the fee-lem title that is screeing right now?" hahhahahaha... what sort of english is this for a civil servant? hhahhahahaa...
eurobear 3 years ago
Movies shown in the cinema have to go through mda for classifications under the Film Act. I will think that if you need to pay to attend a viewing of a movie, it should not be considered a private event, definitely not the same as weddings. If we pay to see shows in cinemas and the films have to go through classifications through mds, what made this particular movie exceptional? If you argue that it is by invitations only, so are movie premieres.
joos0202 3 years ago
To me the mda pple are just doing their job. If you can accept classifications of movies in cinemas why not in this case?
joos0202 3 years ago
THE EXPATS SHOULD BE NICE TO SINGAPOREANS. I love my Chinese, Malay and Indian brothers and sisters. Unfortunately, the 'white' expats spit on all of us. Hey expats, you guys can live in S'pore...no prob...but be nice to us asians. I mean it. I'm fine with oppositions and PAP, but I can NO longer take the expats. WHITEs, be nice to us. Please. If not, there might be a riot. This is no longer the 1900s where you 'whites' are colonial animals. Leave the Chinese, Malay and Indians alone. RESPECT
walkonthewildside78 3 years ago
like your attitude...you believe in racial harmony too..best of luck
generalkim1234 2 years ago
Please don't give that crap `just doing their job lah'. Can a runner for a loanshark say the same?
winstoncheng 3 years ago
The runner for a loanshark is doing an illegal job. U're not making the same comparison.
curiousboy 3 years ago
so anybody who comes in and molds the law to their advantage is in the clear ? :)
yanboa 3 years ago
Depends on how u mould it.
curiousboy 3 years ago
wow, you made that comment more than a month ago, i reply, and you reply back within a few minutes? Are you really a person, or just an "organization"? :) Anyways !
yanboa 3 years ago
Everyone, go and read this informative, non-biased forum :
h t t p :/ /groups . yahoo . com/group/Sg_Review/message/4747
change the last 4 digit of the link above to other numbers for other posts
numbers are: 2480, 4742, 4717, 4678, 4688, 4677, 4676, 4665, 4664, 4637, 4610 etc..
there are many other issues but i guess these are enough for now.
curiousboy 3 years ago
@4.08mins, when asked by SDP members on obection of the contents of the film, she admitted on not knowing the contents??!!! How ironic can that be? If MDA do not know what is the contents, then on what grounds do they reject it?
gincu 3 years ago
The MDA has not seen the film to know it totally but obviously they've been tipped off abt it's rough contents.
curiousboy 3 years ago
And that shows we are in an undemocratic society where we, d ppl, have no rights to clarify our views on the govt. That is just like under a dictatorial state. But for once, I agree on your reasons for NS.
gincu 3 years ago
This society is not totally undemocratic becos ppl are allowed to vote.
But there are a few undemocratic situations and rules which I've put out a few already.
curiousboy 3 years ago
And also they were way off duty hours.
enikisser 3 years ago
After watching this video and listening to their court proceedings, the SDP seems more concerned with their personal agenda of fair campaigning rather than coming up with better policies for the sg ppl.
curiousboy 3 years ago
Seriously, who wud care abt the past history of Singapore? They are more concerned with the current state of the country and it's economy. The only thing they wanna change are SOME regulations they feel uncomfortable.
curiousboy 3 years ago
Now I know that you are still a boy, not yet a man. You do not know the difference of right and wrong. Ask your parents, do they like the goverment? How's the pain is like?
gincu 3 years ago
Wat pain are u talking abt? Healthcare is taken care of, there are no riots, the society is peaceful and economy is strong.. this is wat people really want. They are not interested in public demonstrations which have a high chance of rioting due to ppl's emotions.
curiousboy 3 years ago
The pain of struggling economically, financially and especially emotionally? Are you married? Do you have a family? or do you have a job? does it secure you right to the end? Do you pay taxes? Do you know where do taxpayers money go to? Ask yourself, If you do not have the answer, then ask around...
gincu 3 years ago
Struggling economically, finanacially and emotionally is what everyone in the world faces... tell me who doesn't?
Job security is the same for everyone else in a free market economy unless it's a communist state of the past..
Taxpayers money are used to invest by the govt overseas and etc. I feel it's a necessary move to sustain the economic strength and reserves of this nation totally dependent only on human capital.
curiousboy 3 years ago
the truth is that the govt is brutally pragmatic.
they are willing to do anything to achieve goals, even when it's morally questionable.
kstarmd 3 years ago
U need to provide some facts with ur accusations.. wat are morally questionable?
I only think SOME of their policies need review/changes.
curiousboy 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SDP is crap la... Chee Soon Juan is A Political Tragedy for Singapore.
maverick020 3 years ago
Are you very sure about that? I think you were brought up in a family of selfish, corrupted Singaporeans who don't know what is freedom and democracy. Who only knows MONEY!!! GREEDY PIGS!!
gincu 3 years ago
One of the most undemocratic and biased thing i feel is NS. Cos it absolutely serves only the country's interests and not the individual.
curiousboy 3 years ago 4
@curiousboy It's NS. Of course it serves only the country's interests and not the individual. That's a given and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. What I do have a problem with is that it is mandatory. Whether to serve in the military should be voluntary and a personal decision. If Singaporeans are forced to serve, I don't think they'll be as effective in battle because of being of poor government treatment.
Greetings from the US :)
1XMarksSpot 8 months ago
@1XMarksSpot
If it's not mandatory no one in the right mind will do it.
That's why it is termed as National service ... servicing the nation.
Forced to serve = poor govt treatment ? where's the relationship in that?
curiousboy 7 months ago
@curiousboy "Forced" to serve. Anything that is "forced" is poor treatment.
"No on in their right mind would do it" Tell that to the patriotic people in every country.
1XMarksSpot 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol i see 1 fool trying to talk their way out. talk what cock about wedding dinner n then later private party. totally craps doesnt link at all.....
really wonder what kind of PHD they really study. really perm. head damage O.o
bahnoo 3 years ago
There is a link. She's firstly suggesting that the authorities are being hypocritical in accepting private video screenings (like in weddings in private parties) without the need for censorship procedures, and yet picking on them in this situation. Secondly, she's trying to dig the truth out of the lying MDA officer - that the MDA is picking on them not because of the censorship issue itself, but because of the 'sensitivity' of their video content.
behindeverything 3 years ago
I think you have a very low IQ. What they are refering to is about the approval by MDA. You see, if there is a wedding dinner going on, and the video(usually played by the couples-if u r married, u might understand)is rolling without the MDA license, will they crash it too?You see the law is that you need license to screen it to publicly to large crowds, even if it is a private affair like a wedding dinner..get it??
gincu 3 years ago
This video is anti-govt. different from a wedding dinner video, tt's why MDA came to take it. wat's so hard to understand abt this?
curiousboy 3 years ago 4
do u need the MDA to pamper ur ass everytime?...why?..Singaporean has the RIGHTS to see wat they want to see their humans..humans that are being thought-controlled...mda aint got shit on these pple who just wanna put out the truth! and muthafckas who gets blind and doesnt want to see the truth are nothing better than shitholes
jruzz 3 years ago
This video shows the facts in front but is a bit biased towards the end for the party's personal agenda, not for the ppl's agenda.
And the MDA ppl are jus carrying out their orders to take the video.. don't blame them too much la...
curiousboy 3 years ago
SDP inside got spy la, anything they do are reported directly to PAP de.
LookMaNoBrains 3 years ago 2
Surprised that the MDA folks were not quick enough to react with the various arguements, notably the one on the "wedding dinner", which is an obvious diversion. The law applies when the technicalities are involved but we should also look at the broad context to avoid unnecessary time and resources wastage.
seeweetee 3 years ago
The SDP people are real cocky i gotta say..i wouldn't want them to govern my country! They kept saying about wedding dinners,but is it a wedding dinner?no? but i gotta say the MDA people are simply not shrewd enough to handle such cocky people/weidos.
obededom 3 years ago
Use your brains, they are trying to tell the truth to the people! So if the government lies to you your okay about it? And someone try telling the truth through a legal way is wrong? your obviously bias
vandomVenom 3 years ago
hahaha... Sadly, these officers are not equiped to handle the scenarios. The lady and the ohers are probably more exposed to 'harassment' and better prepared.
spacetourist2007 3 years ago
This is ridiculous... if social security was the issue, then there wouldn't be any private functions or screenings. MDA might as well just start going from functions to functions stopping everyone!
sheepie010900 3 years ago 4
i'm just saying that basically politics evolved into democracy so that people's rights are taken care of..maybe trying to win the people's trust wld b a better way to start off by showing ur own qualities as a party..rather than discrediting ur opponents
sanguofan 3 years ago 3
i think the opposition..especially sdp needs to realign their own strategies..being the opposition shld be abt helping to fine tune the political system in the country and contribute..not making a nuisance of themselves..some of their acts if u let them remain might cause more problems for their own image rather than fighting for the people..it seems that over the years they're on the road of avenging their own "wrongs"..they probably cld learn a bit from Anwar and his coalition
sanguofan 3 years ago 6
Yes indeed, this film is rather educational and gives an alternate perspective to what really happened in Singapore instead of that one sided version we get from history textbooks. And what armyboy24 said is correct, they're twisting the law in a way that the Chees are breaking it, in directly. It's a so called "threat to internal security" i think
razgriz90 3 years ago
Well, put it another view, if let's say if the video being shown in the private screening, involves contents (e.g: terrorism-related) that would be a major security threat to Singapore, would the MDA & police be allowed to barge in and investigate? Of cuz, how would the MDA know the contents? Precisely becuz they dunno e content, that's why they requested the person in charge to let them in to investigate. As usual, the Chees just enjoy being the clowns of Singapore, just second to Steven Lim.
armyboy24 3 years ago
That's insane... do you need to submit what u want to view in the private party....?? lots ppl are doing presentation in party and i believe that ppl don't need to ask permission...
BejingDuck 3 years ago 8
MDA another bunch of gov't dogs..
guards83 3 years ago 18
@guards83 every institution is govt dogs every official is govt dog.
old lee kuan yew is destroying Singapore.
MichaelWithstand 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
these guys seems to be selling a lot of 'merchandize' in a so called 'private' event. seriously, grow up people, these people just want to make quick money. idiots.
reextreem 3 years ago
I'm sure they they will make a fortune selling that stuff. Very funny.
royotto1 3 years ago
this video, indeed educates/informs us (mostly the Gen Ys) on the political arena/issues in Singapore.
That aside, with the Internet and inherent power of viral distribution of content online. Controlling the mainstream media will soon no longer be feasible.
jaysonang 3 years ago
As a person who had admired Singapore for many years following my first visit there in 1971 I have become totally disillusioned by the draconian laws enacted and applied by the Singapore PAP Government that inhibit what would be regarded as very mild dissidence to the ruling powers in democracies. If I was in Singapore and conducted a private screening of such a DVD in my hotel room to invited guests, would the MDA and police invade my room?
Bagsy41 3 years ago 2
Would it be a private screening if you have to pay for it? What so draconian about screening videos for classifications which is what mda do? It seems to me sdp intention is to show the video to pple who are not just personal friends and relatives. Shouldn't the video in questions be treated like commercial films then?
joos0202 3 years ago
I just think that we are going on a slow transition towards democracy. Of cos in this instance it kinda looked like a step backward. until the lee dynasty is over and some good opposition comes along, i dont tink most of us could survive without a govt tellin us wat to do when PAP disappear overnight. anybody tot tis could very well be a ploy of the opposition to attract attention, dey could hv ratted on themselves n put up a show if u noe wat im toking about.
tskuan32 3 years ago
Fuck1n6 cheebye MDA, my blood is boiling watching those fu3kers! We must stand up and be counted agst these cronies. Grow up Singapore We need to mature! "Obstructing justice" LOL or she meant objecting PAP??
dazzawong74 3 years ago 6
I love how logical the lady told off the MDA. But the people at the screening were more focused on eating than the video!
hansel25 3 years ago
I really hope that LKY gets a stroke on nomination day for 2011 elections... i dont want him to die... i want him to lee his party fall in his lifetime.
teasapop 3 years ago 7
what a loser LKY... this is a terrible shame to the international eyes!!
hotshibuya 3 years ago 8
Also the t-shirt is horrible.
arare666 3 years ago
mass orgy of idiocracy. that woman, she should be tasered. she's absolutely berserk!
qoojiao 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You all lousy!
The LEES FOREVER.
They make this country awesome and you all say he corrupt.
BLUFF ONLY.
You all jealous ,want his money only.bastards mother sun of coconut.
But its ok,you all will NEVER win. LEE FOREVER . PAP IN MY BLOOD
arare666 3 years ago
stick and stones will break my bones, words will never hurt me.
Tanahwei 3 years ago