@ThatCanadianGuy23 You didn't respond directly, possibly to get the last word. I shall do the same.
Why don't you need to read a book or talk to a scientist? The reason you don't accept evolution is because of what you think of it. When you see reality, it makes much more sense than you think. If you actually took the time to do this, you would accept evolution.
@ThatCanadianGuy23 The fossil record is what scientists use to find out what happened in evolutionary history. Again, read a book or talk to a scientist. I highly dout 99% of scientists would accept something not supported by any evience.
@ThatCanadianGuy23 "I reject evolution on the basis of plenty of actual evidence"
Who convinced you evolution was false? A creationist website? Shockofgod? These sources cherry-pick the evidence and literally lie to you. Creationist websites are definitely biased to their belief. You should talk to an evolutionary biologist about this. There is so much evidence for evolution that today 99% of scientists accept it. In reality, people don't accept it because it contradicts their beliefs.
@ThatCanadianGuy23 How any unbiased person can still reject evolution completely beats me. The evidence is overwhelming. Evolution theory has changed a lot since Darwin's time, but it is not in any way being shown to be false. I highly doubt 99% of scientists would accept a theory with no evidence. Sure, almost everybody in the 1st millennium thought the world was flat, but that's what the evidence appeared to be pointing to at the time. It's debate over until you can do this with evolution.
Don't even try to reason the concept of God to the monkey people, they are lower beings who do not have the cognitive ability to know God. This is only a function of higher beings! You waste your time trying to convince a monkey..."as a man thinketh so is he, says God." Let the evolutionist be monkeys, "made in the image of a monkey" and we will be the "made in the image of God" people. Hopefully God has a zoo in heaven for the monkey people. If not I hope they like hot fires & brimstone.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE ( In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil) ~ Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology).
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their vital structures, organs, and reproductive system hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works doesn't mean there's no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell then the apparatus exists to direct the formation of more cells, but how did that first cell originate? Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not arrange or produce. If a variation survives then that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION COULDN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
GENETIC INFORMATION COULDN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
alrighty heres a question for evolutioists can the body survive without the brain?and can the brain survive without the body?
also this starter cell um how exactly is it it was able to survive under the elements? and "evolve "did it decide hmm i need to survive the elements so im going to evlove into something that can survive the elements? evolution takes millions of years dont it? so um long before it accomplished that i think the elements would have destroyed it.
@HYE123666 First off, our evolve time, from an amphibian, to mammal, to Australopithecus, to Homo Sapiens, took over 7 MILLION YEARS. Now, I'm no professor, but after the extinction of the dinosaurs, we were able to thrive, basically anywhere we wanted to! So yes, our cell would've survived.
@HYE123666 Your first question assumes evolution happens one step at a time. This is false. The "starter cell" evolved naturally. As the organic material it contained served more functions, the cells with the most beneficial functions were selected by the environment. The cell didn't "decide" and it certainly wasn't aware of the gradual evolution. It's false to assume "the elements" would destroy every form of life. The ones that it wouldn't destroy, would be the ones selected for.
@Cherubim64 Stop saying that darwing is wrong and evolution is not a fact if you don't have any prove to say that. That way you will stop looking like an ignorant.
Darwin has another way than the Designer? Did Darwin create God? or his own god?The Creator of the Universe is not a biproduct of human speculation..The Creator of the Universe has the truth of the Universe and all creation..Darwins theory is flawed indeed..to the One Who Designed and Created....There is no need to change anything in the book of Genesis..to the Darwinian theory.....The Bible cannot be subjugated to all the scientific flaws....that i find in darwins theory...
@Cherubim64 If god created the world and in 7 days later create human, why is it that you can find a 4 billion years bacteria fosil, a 240 million years dinosaur fosil, and yet the oldest human fosil ever found is arround 160 thousand years old. If we can find a bacteria thats 4 billions years old why there isn't any trace of a human 4 billions years a go? There is a lot of prove of evolution in our own eyes to be a fact. There hasn't been any prove that god made human and the world in 7 days.
@kg4bga Carbon/radioactive decay can only be off by so much. A creationist says that...
*The decay rate is not the same
*We don't know how active the creature was to begin with
4.5 billion years is 750,000 times longer then 6000 years. There is no way that the decay rate can get 750,000 times faster nor can the energy in the creature increase 750,000 times.
@rayyvnzla Carbon dating methods are based on assumptions...Its a known fact that there are problems with carbon dating and radiometric dating methods.You might take those figures of being accurate but what assures you they are?Have you done these tests yourself?And how can you prove the validity of these tests?If you learn the facts about carbon dating and other dating methods you might find those figures are no where near as precise as you think...Bacteria fossil 4 billion years old??No way
@Cherubim64 Carbon dating is inaccurate, but not by millions of years. So you can assume that a bacteria fossil was created long, long, long before any human was. And other radiometric methods are much more accurate, some incredibly e.g. uranium-lead radiometric dating which has an error margin of 2-5% which in the case of a time span of a few billion years can be off to only a few million years. This concludes that earth was created many billions of years ago. Just sayin'
@Cherubim64 It is people like you that are causing the decline of the overall intelligence of America. You really believe in a book created by men in the desert over 2000 years ago? The book of Genesis is asinine, and so is God.
@jol223334 Intelligence existed way before any darwinian theory even came into existence..The darwinian theory of evolution and darwinian mechanism can't even explain intelligence...Its a dead theory and mythological ...Thats what your theory is a man made philosophy not a factual science. ..And theres no observed evidence to it as required by science..Speculations with no coherence. You believe in a man created 1800 philosophy.associated with marxism and freudism.
@Cherubim64 Here is the problem with religious people, you guys feel that science needs to have an explanation for everything right now at this very moment, and if science does not have an answer when you snap your fingers then the theory is incorrect. Here is the problem that is an argument from ignorance. Just because we don't have an answer for it now does not mean that there is no way to explain it. With the advancement of technology we will eventually explain intelligence.
@Cherubim64 Second, evolution has been observed in laboratories, so your argument that it has never been observed is false. Scientists make prediction based on genetic evidence, fossil evidence, etc... on what types of transitional forms will be found, and not be found. Third, the Biologists definition of evolution is the change in a gene pool population from generation to generation, by mutation, genetic drift, and natural selection. Once again all these things have been observed.
its a great story about the warrior faces but it was probably just coincidence plus the fact that human beings are hard wired to look for patterns, thats why people think they see jeebus's face on slaces of toast
So you can have sex with a child because you are an animal that has evolved without spiritual moral compass? People like you can justify murder, theft, lies, and peadophilia with evolution theory and think to get away with it never having to answer for such doings to no-one. o boy! Are you in for a big surprize and denial wont help you one iota.
Dawkins dismisses this little tale as false in 'The greatest show on earth'. For him, the crabs carapaces resemble warriors faces by sheer coincidence and not artificial selection. And Dawkins is probably right given that it's his field of expertise.
I still want to believe Sagan's explanation though!
If we understand basic chemistry and physics, we know that all of the atoms in the universe came from hydrogen and helium that formed after the 'Big Bang.'
All the heavier elements came from fusion reactions within stars - and all the elements heavier than iron (Fe) came from 'supernova,' the explosion of big stars.
So, the iron in our blood and the carbon in our brain all came from dead stars.
Sounds like a religion to me!
8KaitNikki8 1 day ago
@Mogley52 I've read ever link you spammed, every one is either fake or debunked by science, creationism is not science.
kyekire 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kyekire
@Mogley52
"I've read ever link you spammed, every one is either fake or debunked by science, creationism is not science"
Correct, creationism is as far from science as is possible. Creationism is nothing more than blind conjecture, zero basis in truth.
That evolution happens, is FACT.
Stone-cold, rock-solid fact! That arguments been over for 150 years. Evolution has gotten nothing but further validation at every turn since.
Denial - an embarrassment to human intellect
nolobede 1 week ago
@ThatCanadianGuy23 You didn't respond directly, possibly to get the last word. I shall do the same.
Why don't you need to read a book or talk to a scientist? The reason you don't accept evolution is because of what you think of it. When you see reality, it makes much more sense than you think. If you actually took the time to do this, you would accept evolution.
AtheismIsCorrect 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThatCanadianGuy23 The fossil record is what scientists use to find out what happened in evolutionary history. Again, read a book or talk to a scientist. I highly dout 99% of scientists would accept something not supported by any evience.
AtheismIsCorrect 3 months ago
@ThatCanadianGuy23 You should read a book or talk to a scientist.
AtheismIsCorrect 3 months ago
@ThatCanadianGuy23 "I reject evolution on the basis of plenty of actual evidence"
Who convinced you evolution was false? A creationist website? Shockofgod? These sources cherry-pick the evidence and literally lie to you. Creationist websites are definitely biased to their belief. You should talk to an evolutionary biologist about this. There is so much evidence for evolution that today 99% of scientists accept it. In reality, people don't accept it because it contradicts their beliefs.
AtheismIsCorrect 3 months ago 2
@ThatCanadianGuy23 How any unbiased person can still reject evolution completely beats me. The evidence is overwhelming. Evolution theory has changed a lot since Darwin's time, but it is not in any way being shown to be false. I highly doubt 99% of scientists would accept a theory with no evidence. Sure, almost everybody in the 1st millennium thought the world was flat, but that's what the evidence appeared to be pointing to at the time. It's debate over until you can do this with evolution.
AtheismIsCorrect 3 months ago
@ThatCanadianGuy23 I agree that evolution is not a fact, but it is supported by so much evidence it is a bit ridiculous to deny it.
AtheismIsCorrect 3 months ago
@AtheismIsCorrect, that is incorrect. Evolution IS a fact. It is observed on a regular basis.
You are conflating the concept of scientific theory with the colloquial.
Keep in mind that scientific "theories" never become "fact." They are two distinct descriptions that are nonlinear. Apples and oranges, if you will.
judoyodan 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't even try to reason the concept of God to the monkey people, they are lower beings who do not have the cognitive ability to know God. This is only a function of higher beings! You waste your time trying to convince a monkey..."as a man thinketh so is he, says God." Let the evolutionist be monkeys, "made in the image of a monkey" and we will be the "made in the image of God" people. Hopefully God has a zoo in heaven for the monkey people. If not I hope they like hot fires & brimstone.
tot792 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE ( In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil) ~ Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology).
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their vital structures, organs, and reproductive system hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works doesn't mean there's no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell then the apparatus exists to direct the formation of more cells, but how did that first cell originate? Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not arrange or produce. If a variation survives then that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION COULDN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION COULDN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
Mogley52 5 months ago
@Mogley52 QUIT SPAMMING NOW
anticorncob6 3 months ago
the 3 people that disliked this are asian and feel bad that they relate to crabs
FadedConceptz 5 months ago
alrighty heres a question for evolutioists can the body survive without the brain?and can the brain survive without the body?
also this starter cell um how exactly is it it was able to survive under the elements? and "evolve "did it decide hmm i need to survive the elements so im going to evlove into something that can survive the elements? evolution takes millions of years dont it? so um long before it accomplished that i think the elements would have destroyed it.
or did it plop into a big...
HYE123666 6 months ago
@HYE123666 First off, our evolve time, from an amphibian, to mammal, to Australopithecus, to Homo Sapiens, took over 7 MILLION YEARS. Now, I'm no professor, but after the extinction of the dinosaurs, we were able to thrive, basically anywhere we wanted to! So yes, our cell would've survived.
indianajoneszilla 5 months ago
@HYE123666 Your first question assumes evolution happens one step at a time. This is false. The "starter cell" evolved naturally. As the organic material it contained served more functions, the cells with the most beneficial functions were selected by the environment. The cell didn't "decide" and it certainly wasn't aware of the gradual evolution. It's false to assume "the elements" would destroy every form of life. The ones that it wouldn't destroy, would be the ones selected for.
Nervousification 5 months ago
2 people are unevolved.
YY4Me133 7 months ago 3
The creature Carl was holding in his hand looks so cute ^^
uyenst 9 months ago
I hope my children evolve to have the same voice as him.
Herpkid56 9 months ago
Evolution IS fact
anticorncob6 10 months ago
Carl Sagans proof of evolution is a fact....Crab faces resemble Warrior faces...What is he trying to say warriors evolved from crabs???
Cherubim64 11 months ago
@Cherubim64 Holy shit, I hope this is a joke.
LightoftheWest7 10 months ago
@Cherubim64 Stop saying that darwing is wrong and evolution is not a fact if you don't have any prove to say that. That way you will stop looking like an ignorant.
rayyvnzla 9 months ago
Darwin has another way than the Designer? Did Darwin create God? or his own god?The Creator of the Universe is not a biproduct of human speculation..The Creator of the Universe has the truth of the Universe and all creation..Darwins theory is flawed indeed..to the One Who Designed and Created....There is no need to change anything in the book of Genesis..to the Darwinian theory.....The Bible cannot be subjugated to all the scientific flaws....that i find in darwins theory...
Cherubim64 11 months ago
@Cherubim64 If god created the world and in 7 days later create human, why is it that you can find a 4 billion years bacteria fosil, a 240 million years dinosaur fosil, and yet the oldest human fosil ever found is arround 160 thousand years old. If we can find a bacteria thats 4 billions years old why there isn't any trace of a human 4 billions years a go? There is a lot of prove of evolution in our own eyes to be a fact. There hasn't been any prove that god made human and the world in 7 days.
rayyvnzla 9 months ago
@rayyvnzla that does not provr evolution. Desides I have prof that cardon dating can not work. So how do you know that these fosils are that old?
kg4bga 9 months ago
@kg4bga Carbon/radioactive decay can only be off by so much. A creationist says that...
*The decay rate is not the same
*We don't know how active the creature was to begin with
4.5 billion years is 750,000 times longer then 6000 years. There is no way that the decay rate can get 750,000 times faster nor can the energy in the creature increase 750,000 times.
anticorncob6 8 months ago
@rayyvnzla Carbon dating methods are based on assumptions...Its a known fact that there are problems with carbon dating and radiometric dating methods.You might take those figures of being accurate but what assures you they are?Have you done these tests yourself?And how can you prove the validity of these tests?If you learn the facts about carbon dating and other dating methods you might find those figures are no where near as precise as you think...Bacteria fossil 4 billion years old??No way
Cherubim64 7 months ago
@Cherubim64 Carbon dating is inaccurate, but not by millions of years. So you can assume that a bacteria fossil was created long, long, long before any human was. And other radiometric methods are much more accurate, some incredibly e.g. uranium-lead radiometric dating which has an error margin of 2-5% which in the case of a time span of a few billion years can be off to only a few million years. This concludes that earth was created many billions of years ago. Just sayin'
dillondownie 6 months ago
@Cherubim64 It is people like you that are causing the decline of the overall intelligence of America. You really believe in a book created by men in the desert over 2000 years ago? The book of Genesis is asinine, and so is God.
jol223334 7 months ago 2
@jol223334 Intelligence existed way before any darwinian theory even came into existence..The darwinian theory of evolution and darwinian mechanism can't even explain intelligence...Its a dead theory and mythological ...Thats what your theory is a man made philosophy not a factual science. ..And theres no observed evidence to it as required by science..Speculations with no coherence. You believe in a man created 1800 philosophy.associated with marxism and freudism.
Cherubim64 7 months ago
@Cherubim64 Here is the problem with religious people, you guys feel that science needs to have an explanation for everything right now at this very moment, and if science does not have an answer when you snap your fingers then the theory is incorrect. Here is the problem that is an argument from ignorance. Just because we don't have an answer for it now does not mean that there is no way to explain it. With the advancement of technology we will eventually explain intelligence.
jol223334 7 months ago 2
@Cherubim64 Second, evolution has been observed in laboratories, so your argument that it has never been observed is false. Scientists make prediction based on genetic evidence, fossil evidence, etc... on what types of transitional forms will be found, and not be found. Third, the Biologists definition of evolution is the change in a gene pool population from generation to generation, by mutation, genetic drift, and natural selection. Once again all these things have been observed.
jol223334 7 months ago 2
2 people are creationists
And I actually think that, not just a joke...
anticorncob6 11 months ago
In a juvinile sense of humor. Carl Sagan's got crabs.
crazyinsane500 1 year ago
lmao @ 1:30
UcanbeGOD 1 year ago
not a single advancement in technology is a product of macroevolution
KingsChamps02 1 year ago
its a great story about the warrior faces but it was probably just coincidence plus the fact that human beings are hard wired to look for patterns, thats why people think they see jeebus's face on slaces of toast
bigmanoooo1 1 year ago
@bigmanoooo1 *slices
bigmanoooo1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So you can have sex with a child because you are an animal that has evolved without spiritual moral compass? People like you can justify murder, theft, lies, and peadophilia with evolution theory and think to get away with it never having to answer for such doings to no-one. o boy! Are you in for a big surprize and denial wont help you one iota.
antiazazel 1 year ago
Sagan is my God!!
ayyawark 1 year ago
Dawkins dismisses this little tale as false in 'The greatest show on earth'. For him, the crabs carapaces resemble warriors faces by sheer coincidence and not artificial selection. And Dawkins is probably right given that it's his field of expertise.
I still want to believe Sagan's explanation though!
IstickThingsUpMyBum 1 year ago
I want to make love to his voice
Richy15251 1 year ago
@Richy15251 I'll agree there. he does have a way with words and having those short breaks and slight emphasis on the words.
Yarrick2k5 1 year ago
I PITY THE FOOL
fishy488 1 year ago
Comment removed
fishy488 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Evolution as FACT? c'mon - that's absurd.
Freenetnow 2 years ago
Here is a more in depth video from a biologists lecturing to Evangelicals ."Can an Evangelical Christian Accept Evolution? - Part 1"
flyingscience 2 years ago
Not only can they accept evolution, but they can interject ID into the mix and claim it as their own, as if they knew it all along...
TheBigCollapse 2 years ago
If we understand basic chemistry and physics, we know that all of the atoms in the universe came from hydrogen and helium that formed after the 'Big Bang.'
All the heavier elements came from fusion reactions within stars - and all the elements heavier than iron (Fe) came from 'supernova,' the explosion of big stars.
So, the iron in our blood and the carbon in our brain all came from dead stars.
goog2k 2 years ago 4
In fact, all the atoms on earth came from ancient stars that blew up billions of years ago.
We are all walking, talking stardust --
this cosmos become AWAKE,
looking back at itself . . .
Thank you, Carl.
goog2k 2 years ago 2
Go Sagan!
ashaubert 2 years ago 26
This has been flagged as spam show
The arrogance and ignorance of this astounds me lol
wowperson26 2 years ago
The arrogance and ignorance of the previous comment astounds me.
Aught3 2 years ago 28
What did it say, it was voted down out of existence
questionsamson 2 years ago
Oh, something about the arrogance and ignorance of scientists/atheists/etc.
Aught3 2 years ago
ass
sandwichtaster 2 years ago