I think that it all started with an incredible amount of chemical reactions going on somewhere and then one by chance has the nature of initiating basically the same reaction through its on reaction, only with extremely small differences. Those spawn reactions then continue this pattern, producing very similar reactions with small differences, randomly leading to more varied and complex spawn reactions that were able to maintain that nature, eventually sparking what we now refer to as "life"
If you like watching documentaries on youtube, visit my website which you can find on my youtube channel!
I have created a collection of links to interesting documentaries on subjects like the history and culture of nations, world war II, science and conspiracy theories!
Or simply select and copy the following lines into your browser's address bar:
I believe that life is an accident. Take this the theory is there's an infinite amount of parallel universes according to string theory & M-theory so with an infinite number of universes some will be right for life and think about a calculator, the odds are it can't form by accident but with an infinite number of universes in some by pure accident a calculator could be created by no one, just by random luck.
The same could have been for life. Then evolution lead 2 us and we became civilized.
@deanmullen10 Kind of like the theory of a monkey typing for an infinite amount of time and eventually typing up the entire works of Shakespeare? Interesting.
@deanmullen10 You should get to know chemistry a little better and understand the properties of the elements. It isn't by random change that octane burns. It isn't by random chance that substance X has some specific melting point. It certainly is not by random chance that the element of life is carbon.
@vmelkon I know that but I meant it starts by accident as in there is no creator behind it and it happens due to the mathematical theory of probabilities and time passing.
@deanmullen10 There is no creator behind it but you can't compare the universe to something from the field of mathematics (just probability of the numbers). Example : if I had a 6 sided dice, what are the chances of rolling it and getting a 6?
@vmelkon I know that but I mean the reason life forms is because even though its unlikely to happen, over time the possibility can come to pass, it was just a gesture, a quick way of saying life emerged because the Earth had millions of years for life to form and the universe is so big that life would emerge inevitably.
"3 and a half thousand million years ago"...listen dude, I understand the word billion. You can say 3.5 billion and my brain will in fact NOT explode.
Life started from 1 sphere with every element squashed inside it this sphere with every element splashing around init came from inside that one tiny sphere there is nothing outside that sphere. and it grew until temps got outta hand then a tiny explosion happend then the life began thats the only theory i have for this if that's not true then there is a god.
@bullshitskater101012 thats stupid, everyone knows that god game birth in a italian restaurant and his mom is the all knowing all saucy Spagetti monster.
Man is so well made and put together, it shows that an intelligence created it instead of random chance. If we didn't have something as simple as bees on planet Earth, most life would die within 4 years (Einstein said this).. What if bees didn't form by random chance? We wouldn't be here right now lol..
@Kr0n1k4Lyfe The eco-systems that we have on our planet consists of species that has over time found ways to exploit each other in order to survive. bees are a part of many eco-systems, and are, like all other species, formed by natural selection (not random chance). if bees had not evolved, the eco- systems would not be dependant on them. But you are right about that we may not have existed if so was.
Not to disrespect your religion, but to me it seems God is more of a question than an answer.
Ok then, where did your magical god appear from? What does he do? Did he save or help the people of Japan, no science did. Another point to note, do you believe in Santa Clause? Of course not because I dearly hope you are intelligent enough to not believe this, but then why believe in a magical invisible person that does things with a click of a finger, producing matter and energy which is impossible to the law of physics. These aren't like normal laws, these are impossible to break.
Part 2. At least science has a good answer (the Big Bang Theory) that has actually blown religion out of the water, since Christianity has had to chop and change its views that are in the 'original' scriptures to fit with the facts. When you ask science a question it can give you an answer with examples and some sort of theory about why it happens and if not, it at least says "I don't know" and then go on and find out.
Part 3. Religion on the other hand always gives the answer "God did it" like some sort of child. Religion said that heaven was in the sky, we went to the sky and there was nothing there, then they said it was in space and once again, we have been there and still no heaven?
Part 4. Btw I'm 16 and I'm able to give perfectly good, valid information and argue about this topic showing that religion is really just dying out (mainly by killing themselves over Jesus or something?) modern day kids are at least intelligent enough to make their own decisions, not just have a priest stuff a bible down their throat. You are born into a religion in modern times, and people are realising that "god did it" isn't a satisfactory answer to life's biggest questions.
We will never know how life began. One cell must come from another cell. The "Big Bang" did not let out cells, did it. Now life could not begin without this process...
I am not usually biased, but God is the most probable answer to life.
I've tried to have an open mind on religion and all I ever witness is bloodshed and confusion. To throw out Science fact and theory and in place be told to believe in invisible entities and a man who was born of a virgin, raises the dead, raised from dead, walk on water and heal peoples afflictions and if I don't believe in this impossibility I will burn forever after physical death...once again something another HUMAN told me. As which was told to him and so forth, sorry religion..no way jose
@RespectMyHate those stories in the Bible are wonderful. And that's why I think they're not true, and that the most important thing is to see the POINT of the stories and the MESSAGE. NOT believe it actually happened. The Bible has been tampered with. Fact. Who knows how it has changed or who changed it.
What is important is to know there's been a religion since that has remained unaltered for 1400 years. Islam. Jesus (Issa) and his mother Mary (Maryam) are central to it.
@assym2006 GOD IS ETERNAL. He had no creator. GOD JUST EXISTS.
look either way you look at it, something always exsisted. I think it was God based on all the complexity I see in nature, and you believe it was a cosmic burp, and then everything ordered itself into more order, randomly.
@assym2006 even laws can be changed if there is contrary evidence. science isn't out to prove anything it just observes nature.
So based on that fact, when I see the highly advanced information storage system of DNA, or the computer brain, or heart pump and all the other amazing parts of the body. I think is safe and scientific to assume an intelligence created such things.
much the same way I look at a truck, or a powerdrill, its safe to say and intelligence created such things.
@RespectMyHate "science isn't out to prove anything it just observes nature" -wrong. It proves and disproves through scientific observation.
We know perfectly well why DNA, our brains, and our hearts are the way they are. And we know that natural selection, which forms the basis for why animals adapt, is not random.
"even laws can be changed if there is contrary evidence" - and yet there is no evidence to prove the Bible has not been tampered yet you believe it fully.
@assym2006 Why can't God be a theory, just about everything else is, multi universe (never been observed), The big bang (never been observed), Current theories on star formation (a star have never been observed forming), macro evolution (never been observed) just about every current theory on origins are accepted except God. and its always God you never hear people fight over whether the FSM exists Its always God.
God should be a theory becuase there is so much order in the universe.
Show like these need to say " this is what we believe" instead of teaching everything as fact.
The only reason anyone started using long ages for earth was to make time for the theory of evolution, Evolution needed big time lines for people to believe it, the truth is, we dont really know how old the earth is, they should atleast be honest.
@brandisify; No, no. The long ages of the Earth were hypothesized in the first place to explain the rock formations that are found the world over. Hutton developed the long ages theory 100 years before Darwin. We do quite closely know the age of Earth (or rather we know quite a lot about events in the process of building the Earth), and we have learned quite a lot about the early times especially from studying the Apollo moon rocks. That is honest, and not prophesy.
@Salger12: All beings have always been members of communities from the very earliest times. At the point where cells began building multi-cellular creatures, there has nearly always been sexual reproduction, and thus the basis for community. Individuals don't evolve; species do.
( 0:57 - 1:15 ) ( 1:30 - 2:11 ) ( 2:13 - 2:55 ) (etc...) Why does every investigatory science video feature some guy walking or standing around in the middle of nowhere? Really? Or maybe I have just happened to stumble upon every single one with these coincidental similarities...
@puncheex Yes, Its truly just common sense, Think of it this way what is need to form a simple form of life? think of it in parts, how may parts would be necessary? then all of then parts need to come together, and then Come to life.
Now we can take a dead man, he has alll the parts necessary to house life, but where does the element of life come from? once hes dead you can shock him all day long but he will never be a living being again.
Therefore evolutionist are left with a massive problem
@RespectMyHate: As has no doubt been explained at you many times, evolution is not abiogenesis.
Chemicals react with each other all the time: CO2 dissolves in water, dissolves mineral and moves them elsewhere to sublimate out; fire burns cellulose and makes it water and CO2, and so on. Well, all you need is a reaction that results in a copy of the original being made. Fluorocarbons in the ozone layer come close - they react with ozone, change, expel oxygen, and reassemble, ...
... but the result is 1:1 rather than 1:something greater than 1. If you can find an endothermic reaction that does that, you have life, at least in a reproductive sense. It has been found that RNA can do that, and additionally that simple RNA can be constructed without undue problems in a totally random way, requiring only minimal chemical concentrations and energy, and time. All the rest of life's functions can come later; that's evolution.
@RespectMyHate: Well, I have, but my expertise is in Computer Engineering, so I took a shortcut and simulated it. Nothing like life as we know it, of course, but Conway would recognize it.
Heh. You have no idea; I had a Saturday morning job.
@puncheex Is there anyway your computer simulation could have created itself, or the program you used? No because you need an intelligence to put it together.
Look we are very complex machines, but we are special because we have life, so we already know that no machine can just evolve, but then you have to add the element of life in the picture, which makes it even harder to believe in evolution.
My best conclusion is this, there is an eternal intelligent being who created everything. GOD.
@RespectMyHate: My reference was to the game of Life, a cellular automaton developed by John Horton Conway in the 60s. It was a semi-facetious remark designed to answer your facetious remark about developing my own life randomly. If you were serious in your remark then you demonstrate profound lack of biological understanding.
Self replicating programs are everywhere; you know them as viruses. True, they didn't create themselves, but I don't think it will be long before they do.
... "we are special because we have life, so we already know that no machine can just evolve". Your logic is all crusted up. How do you "know ... no machine can evolve", and why should that be a consequence of the fact that "we have life"? As far as I know, life is just a chemical process requiring only that a chemical be capable of replicating itself from feedstocks and energy; all the rest is decoration. You want it to be some unattainable magic so you can be special with its possession.
@mariahandchristina it's all a complex chemical reaction. even you are, the definition life is abstract. you can say a star is also alive. we are biochemical computers who just don't realize that.
In the beginning of God theory a human said him, why? So he said, it must be something better than us, and blablabla. But now we found how, so we don't need to believe in fairy tales, and spoof things like God
@jonas073 You took the words right out o my mouth. I was just about to post a comment saying exactly the same thing. Why can't people just accept the truth? Why do they have to find out another way that life began when we can tell them the true answer?
@ExtremeFaithInJesus because your just finding the most simple answers to life's hardest questions in order to avoid thinking. Just sitting there relying on folk lore passed down from ancient generations during a time where they didn't have the means or technology to investigate these questions, so instead had to explain them through magic.
dont insult people because of their beliefs, it is very immature. its also very sad that someone who believes in god can be so angry and intolerant in something as simple as a youtube comment. besides you cannot prove either theory
is it really pointless to attempt to go back beyond the Big Bang, is it meaningless to ask what came 'before'. If time itself came into existence with the Big Bang. were did the universe come from were did the big bang come from and why? I really want to know.
I don't quite understand why everyone has to believe that there was some sort of beginning, while in reality, it would make far much more sense to believe that there was never really a beginning. With our logic, it is impossible for the universe to have been created, rather it would have had to have always existed. Perhaps the problem is humans cannot possibly comprehend infinity, it's the same thing as trying to think that there is a boundary to the universe.
@Pride124: There are good scientific reasons to think so. Hubble in the 1920s discovered galaxies beyond our own, and then he determined that they are all moving away from us and each other. If that is extrapolated backwards, they must have at one time all been together in a single point. That's the beginning; corroborating evidence in many forms has been discovered since then.
The basic problem is that NONE of the people who attack evolution have actually studied it. If they did, they would of course see that there's nothing TO attack. It isn't a Satanic Conspiracy, it's simply the description of a process, providing a very useful taxonomy and a way to understand relationships. I see no way around this problem of ignorance. And it will become far worse if we allow these untutored people to drag our science education back into the bronze age.
as you should well know..most people have an issue with macro evolution not micro evolution.micro has been shown in labs rather easily
macro we only have evidence of from fossils, which since that record is as of late incomplete allows room for skeptics to argue,not to mention the Cambrian explosion.
Macro evolution is micro evolution, just on a larger time scale. It is obvious that little changes over time(millions of years) will eventually become big changes.
@draconusrex33: OTOH, there is absolutely no reason, apart from the words of Genesis, to suppose that macro-evolution, being micro-evolution sustained over a longer time period, has not occurred, and no proposed mechanism to prevent it.
Science isn't exactly an exact art, they do get it wrong a lot of the time. Do not place blind faith in scientists, they are not infallible. Life on Earth arose due to bombardment from meteors already containing microbial life and not from a soup of amino acid building blocks. As to how life starts anywhere - who knows? The truth is out there.
@RespectMyHate: Sure it does. There are many instances of major theories being scrapped or overhauled in light of experimental data which contradicted them. I can name dozens: phlogiston theory, luminiferous ether theory, classical mechanics, the structure of the atom, chemical bonding, Ptolemy's epicyclic theory, protein encoding theory, Steady State cosmology, galaxy-as-universe, Lamarkianism, ... the list goes on. Why do you say it does not?
But this life form those meteors is from where? So there's alot of good reason to believe that the life (on our planet) is born on our planet. If we go on Europa, a Jupiter's moon, and that we dig in the ice, under the ice, there's a massive ocean, so in the center of the moon its quite hotter, maybe enought to permit life
I think that it all started with an incredible amount of chemical reactions going on somewhere and then one by chance has the nature of initiating basically the same reaction through its on reaction, only with extremely small differences. Those spawn reactions then continue this pattern, producing very similar reactions with small differences, randomly leading to more varied and complex spawn reactions that were able to maintain that nature, eventually sparking what we now refer to as "life"
thereaISIimShady 2 weeks ago
All who think atoms randomly collided into cells are idiots and u think that olden day people were mad? You are thinking just like them.
MrShed1122 1 month ago
"Where this cowpat is." lmao wtf!?
gregapage 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey!
If you like watching documentaries on youtube, visit my website which you can find on my youtube channel!
I have created a collection of links to interesting documentaries on subjects like the history and culture of nations, world war II, science and conspiracy theories!
Or simply select and copy the following lines into your browser's address bar:
MYHISTORYLINK
.
COM
MrFlohi 5 months ago in playlist How did life begin?
I believe that life is an accident. Take this the theory is there's an infinite amount of parallel universes according to string theory & M-theory so with an infinite number of universes some will be right for life and think about a calculator, the odds are it can't form by accident but with an infinite number of universes in some by pure accident a calculator could be created by no one, just by random luck.
The same could have been for life. Then evolution lead 2 us and we became civilized.
deanmullen10 5 months ago
@deanmullen10 Kind of like the theory of a monkey typing for an infinite amount of time and eventually typing up the entire works of Shakespeare? Interesting.
Kittywhiskers1000 4 months ago
@deanmullen10 You should get to know chemistry a little better and understand the properties of the elements. It isn't by random change that octane burns. It isn't by random chance that substance X has some specific melting point. It certainly is not by random chance that the element of life is carbon.
vmelkon 2 months ago
@vmelkon I know that but I meant it starts by accident as in there is no creator behind it and it happens due to the mathematical theory of probabilities and time passing.
deanmullen10 2 months ago
@deanmullen10 There is no creator behind it but you can't compare the universe to something from the field of mathematics (just probability of the numbers). Example : if I had a 6 sided dice, what are the chances of rolling it and getting a 6?
vmelkon 2 months ago
@vmelkon I know that but I mean the reason life forms is because even though its unlikely to happen, over time the possibility can come to pass, it was just a gesture, a quick way of saying life emerged because the Earth had millions of years for life to form and the universe is so big that life would emerge inevitably.
deanmullen10 2 months ago
"3 and a half thousand million years ago"...listen dude, I understand the word billion. You can say 3.5 billion and my brain will in fact NOT explode.
SilentMott 8 months ago
Life started from 1 sphere with every element squashed inside it this sphere with every element splashing around init came from inside that one tiny sphere there is nothing outside that sphere. and it grew until temps got outta hand then a tiny explosion happend then the life began thats the only theory i have for this if that's not true then there is a god.
mw2cod4blackops 10 months ago
@bullshitskater101012 thats stupid, everyone knows that god game birth in a italian restaurant and his mom is the all knowing all saucy Spagetti monster.
lexdimond1 10 months ago
And God doesn't need a creator, he is the creator. He is not bound by time, or the laws of the Universe that he made.
Kr0n1k4Lyfe 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Kr0n1k4Lyfe "And God doesn't need a creator, he is the creator. He is not bound by time, or the laws of the Universe that he made."
An intelligent being existent for an infinite amount of time? Who discovered it? When was it discovered? How can I repeat his experiment?
vmelkon 2 months ago
JESUS is GOD. No other God before him.
Man is so well made and put together, it shows that an intelligence created it instead of random chance. If we didn't have something as simple as bees on planet Earth, most life would die within 4 years (Einstein said this).. What if bees didn't form by random chance? We wouldn't be here right now lol..
God is the answer.
Kr0n1k4Lyfe 10 months ago
@Kr0n1k4Lyfe The eco-systems that we have on our planet consists of species that has over time found ways to exploit each other in order to survive. bees are a part of many eco-systems, and are, like all other species, formed by natural selection (not random chance). if bees had not evolved, the eco- systems would not be dependant on them. But you are right about that we may not have existed if so was.
Not to disrespect your religion, but to me it seems God is more of a question than an answer.
Sildesalaten 8 months ago
Comment removed
coopen06 10 months ago
@volsrule101
coopen06 10 months ago
Ok then, where did your magical god appear from? What does he do? Did he save or help the people of Japan, no science did. Another point to note, do you believe in Santa Clause? Of course not because I dearly hope you are intelligent enough to not believe this, but then why believe in a magical invisible person that does things with a click of a finger, producing matter and energy which is impossible to the law of physics. These aren't like normal laws, these are impossible to break.
coopen06 10 months ago
Part 2. At least science has a good answer (the Big Bang Theory) that has actually blown religion out of the water, since Christianity has had to chop and change its views that are in the 'original' scriptures to fit with the facts. When you ask science a question it can give you an answer with examples and some sort of theory about why it happens and if not, it at least says "I don't know" and then go on and find out.
coopen06 10 months ago
Part 3. Religion on the other hand always gives the answer "God did it" like some sort of child. Religion said that heaven was in the sky, we went to the sky and there was nothing there, then they said it was in space and once again, we have been there and still no heaven?
coopen06 10 months ago
Part 4. Btw I'm 16 and I'm able to give perfectly good, valid information and argue about this topic showing that religion is really just dying out (mainly by killing themselves over Jesus or something?) modern day kids are at least intelligent enough to make their own decisions, not just have a priest stuff a bible down their throat. You are born into a religion in modern times, and people are realising that "god did it" isn't a satisfactory answer to life's biggest questions.
coopen06 10 months ago
@coopen06 I salute your will for reasoning and your using of your intelligence!
lexdimond1 10 months ago
GOD is the answer!!!
volsrule101 10 months ago
We will never know how life began. One cell must come from another cell. The "Big Bang" did not let out cells, did it. Now life could not begin without this process...
I am not usually biased, but God is the most probable answer to life.
HyperChief117 1 year ago
if we go here where the cow pat is LOL
bentotheclarke 1 year ago
I've tried to have an open mind on religion and all I ever witness is bloodshed and confusion. To throw out Science fact and theory and in place be told to believe in invisible entities and a man who was born of a virgin, raises the dead, raised from dead, walk on water and heal peoples afflictions and if I don't believe in this impossibility I will burn forever after physical death...once again something another HUMAN told me. As which was told to him and so forth, sorry religion..no way jose
kpreston69 1 year ago
@assym2006 I have read about alot of great men but I have only heard of one man whose birth divided history.
I've only read about one man who walked on water.
I've read of only one man who had the power to control the elements.
Had the power to raise the dead.
And even atheist call on in times of trouble.
I think you know who I'm talking about.
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
@RespectMyHate those stories in the Bible are wonderful. And that's why I think they're not true, and that the most important thing is to see the POINT of the stories and the MESSAGE. NOT believe it actually happened. The Bible has been tampered with. Fact. Who knows how it has changed or who changed it.
What is important is to know there's been a religion since that has remained unaltered for 1400 years. Islam. Jesus (Issa) and his mother Mary (Maryam) are central to it.
Prove you are right.
ramzevans 1 year ago
@assym2006 GOD IS ETERNAL. He had no creator. GOD JUST EXISTS.
look either way you look at it, something always exsisted. I think it was God based on all the complexity I see in nature, and you believe it was a cosmic burp, and then everything ordered itself into more order, randomly.
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
@assym2006 even laws can be changed if there is contrary evidence. science isn't out to prove anything it just observes nature.
So based on that fact, when I see the highly advanced information storage system of DNA, or the computer brain, or heart pump and all the other amazing parts of the body. I think is safe and scientific to assume an intelligence created such things.
much the same way I look at a truck, or a powerdrill, its safe to say and intelligence created such things.
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
@RespectMyHate "science isn't out to prove anything it just observes nature" -wrong. It proves and disproves through scientific observation.
We know perfectly well why DNA, our brains, and our hearts are the way they are. And we know that natural selection, which forms the basis for why animals adapt, is not random.
"even laws can be changed if there is contrary evidence" - and yet there is no evidence to prove the Bible has not been tampered yet you believe it fully.
Crazy? Probably.
ramzevans 1 year ago
@assym2006 Why can't God be a theory, just about everything else is, multi universe (never been observed), The big bang (never been observed), Current theories on star formation (a star have never been observed forming), macro evolution (never been observed) just about every current theory on origins are accepted except God. and its always God you never hear people fight over whether the FSM exists Its always God.
God should be a theory becuase there is so much order in the universe.
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
Show like these need to say " this is what we believe" instead of teaching everything as fact.
The only reason anyone started using long ages for earth was to make time for the theory of evolution, Evolution needed big time lines for people to believe it, the truth is, we dont really know how old the earth is, they should atleast be honest.
brandisify 1 year ago
@brandisify; No, no. The long ages of the Earth were hypothesized in the first place to explain the rock formations that are found the world over. Hutton developed the long ages theory 100 years before Darwin. We do quite closely know the age of Earth (or rather we know quite a lot about events in the process of building the Earth), and we have learned quite a lot about the early times especially from studying the Apollo moon rocks. That is honest, and not prophesy.
puncheex 1 year ago
I think their really has to be a god. I mean, how is it possible that the first humans were able to sustain themselves, without being adults?
Salger12 1 year ago
@Salger12: All beings have always been members of communities from the very earliest times. At the point where cells began building multi-cellular creatures, there has nearly always been sexual reproduction, and thus the basis for community. Individuals don't evolve; species do.
puncheex 1 year ago
life comet hit earth tini microscop bacterie over 75345 bllions year growing they finaly get to continent
stjepanzero 1 year ago
How did life begin.... SIMPLE
Some shit blew up... Duno where the shit came from.. but it blew up...
Then some shit changed from microscopic organisms to big fish and shit.
Then gills turned into lungs for some unknown reason... Then shit got smarter... Now we are trying to figure it out.....
TheMango121 1 year ago 18
@TheMango121 hahaha that's maybe the smartest thing i've heard in a long time lol
chris49195092 11 months ago
i think that we ask the wrong question when we think of this... we ask how when we should ask why
ALSchmiiProductions 1 year ago
( 0:57 - 1:15 ) ( 1:30 - 2:11 ) ( 2:13 - 2:55 ) (etc...) Why does every investigatory science video feature some guy walking or standing around in the middle of nowhere? Really? Or maybe I have just happened to stumble upon every single one with these coincidental similarities...
JustCameOnYourFace 1 year ago
@JustCameOnYourFace: It's more interesting than a talking head, and cheaper to produce than an animation.
puncheex 1 year ago
life can't spontaneosly arise by itself its impossible.
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
@RespectMyHate: That's pretty assertive. Got any reasons why this should be so?
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex Yes, Its truly just common sense, Think of it this way what is need to form a simple form of life? think of it in parts, how may parts would be necessary? then all of then parts need to come together, and then Come to life.
Now we can take a dead man, he has alll the parts necessary to house life, but where does the element of life come from? once hes dead you can shock him all day long but he will never be a living being again.
Therefore evolutionist are left with a massive problem
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
@RespectMyHate: As has no doubt been explained at you many times, evolution is not abiogenesis.
Chemicals react with each other all the time: CO2 dissolves in water, dissolves mineral and moves them elsewhere to sublimate out; fire burns cellulose and makes it water and CO2, and so on. Well, all you need is a reaction that results in a copy of the original being made. Fluorocarbons in the ozone layer come close - they react with ozone, change, expel oxygen, and reassemble, ...
puncheex 1 year ago
... but the result is 1:1 rather than 1:something greater than 1. If you can find an endothermic reaction that does that, you have life, at least in a reproductive sense. It has been found that RNA can do that, and additionally that simple RNA can be constructed without undue problems in a totally random way, requiring only minimal chemical concentrations and energy, and time. All the rest of life's functions can come later; that's evolution.
I see no necessity to deny life could happen.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex If you see how life can form randomly, then why don't you make some life. Go make some in your room.
You watched too many cartoons as a kid.
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
@RespectMyHate: Well, I have, but my expertise is in Computer Engineering, so I took a shortcut and simulated it. Nothing like life as we know it, of course, but Conway would recognize it.
Heh. You have no idea; I had a Saturday morning job.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex Is there anyway your computer simulation could have created itself, or the program you used? No because you need an intelligence to put it together.
Look we are very complex machines, but we are special because we have life, so we already know that no machine can just evolve, but then you have to add the element of life in the picture, which makes it even harder to believe in evolution.
My best conclusion is this, there is an eternal intelligent being who created everything. GOD.
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
@RespectMyHate: My reference was to the game of Life, a cellular automaton developed by John Horton Conway in the 60s. It was a semi-facetious remark designed to answer your facetious remark about developing my own life randomly. If you were serious in your remark then you demonstrate profound lack of biological understanding.
Self replicating programs are everywhere; you know them as viruses. True, they didn't create themselves, but I don't think it will be long before they do.
puncheex 1 year ago
... "we are special because we have life, so we already know that no machine can just evolve". Your logic is all crusted up. How do you "know ... no machine can evolve", and why should that be a consequence of the fact that "we have life"? As far as I know, life is just a chemical process requiring only that a chemical be capable of replicating itself from feedstocks and energy; all the rest is decoration. You want it to be some unattainable magic so you can be special with its possession.
puncheex 1 year ago
I dont believe in god or things like that.. So how do you explain 2 me how life began?
mariahandchristina 1 year ago 2
@mariahandchristina it's all a complex chemical reaction. even you are, the definition life is abstract. you can say a star is also alive. we are biochemical computers who just don't realize that.
BDolf030 1 year ago
wat happened before the 3.5 thousand million years ago..?
NoobsUnited 1 year ago
@NoobsUnited: We were just a philosophical potential in the middle of a star.
puncheex 1 year ago
Guys I Swear I Did NOT PUT THAT COMMENT SOMEONE KACKED ME CUS I NEVER SAID IDIOT ON YOUTUBE GUYS I SWEAR !
thexmoker 2 years ago
Yes, that is very believable...
Pride124 2 years ago
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.
Genesis 1:1
jonas073 2 years ago
In the beginning of God theory a human said him, why? So he said, it must be something better than us, and blablabla. But now we found how, so we don't need to believe in fairy tales, and spoof things like God
bengacris 1 year ago
@jonas073 You took the words right out o my mouth. I was just about to post a comment saying exactly the same thing. Why can't people just accept the truth? Why do they have to find out another way that life began when we can tell them the true answer?
ExtremeFaithInJesus 1 year ago
@ExtremeFaithInJesus because your just finding the most simple answers to life's hardest questions in order to avoid thinking. Just sitting there relying on folk lore passed down from ancient generations during a time where they didn't have the means or technology to investigate these questions, so instead had to explain them through magic.
steveywh2 1 year ago
GOD MADE EVERYTHING U BLIND IDIOTS
thexmoker 2 years ago
dont insult people because of their beliefs, it is very immature. its also very sad that someone who believes in god can be so angry and intolerant in something as simple as a youtube comment. besides you cannot prove either theory
gleneth00 2 years ago
He has a close resemblance to physicist Paul Dirac.
crawhip2 2 years ago
is it really pointless to attempt to go back beyond the Big Bang, is it meaningless to ask what came 'before'. If time itself came into existence with the Big Bang. were did the universe come from were did the big bang come from and why? I really want to know.
nemes818 2 years ago
I don't quite understand why everyone has to believe that there was some sort of beginning, while in reality, it would make far much more sense to believe that there was never really a beginning. With our logic, it is impossible for the universe to have been created, rather it would have had to have always existed. Perhaps the problem is humans cannot possibly comprehend infinity, it's the same thing as trying to think that there is a boundary to the universe.
Pride124 2 years ago
@Pride124 sure, but we have proof for the Big Bang, that's why we are searching.
bengacris 1 year ago
@Pride124: There are good scientific reasons to think so. Hubble in the 1920s discovered galaxies beyond our own, and then he determined that they are all moving away from us and each other. If that is extrapolated backwards, they must have at one time all been together in a single point. That's the beginning; corroborating evidence in many forms has been discovered since then.
puncheex 1 year ago
were did the universe come from?
nemes818 2 years ago
@nemes818 Big Bang!
bengacris 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Imaginefree69 2 years ago
as you should well know..most people have an issue with macro evolution not micro evolution.micro has been shown in labs rather easily
macro we only have evidence of from fossils, which since that record is as of late incomplete allows room for skeptics to argue,not to mention the Cambrian explosion.
draconusrex33 2 years ago
Macro evolution is micro evolution, just on a larger time scale. It is obvious that little changes over time(millions of years) will eventually become big changes.
tyrone9009 2 years ago
@draconusrex33: OTOH, there is absolutely no reason, apart from the words of Genesis, to suppose that macro-evolution, being micro-evolution sustained over a longer time period, has not occurred, and no proposed mechanism to prevent it.
puncheex 1 year ago
Science isn't exactly an exact art, they do get it wrong a lot of the time. Do not place blind faith in scientists, they are not infallible. Life on Earth arose due to bombardment from meteors already containing microbial life and not from a soup of amino acid building blocks. As to how life starts anywhere - who knows? The truth is out there.
shizzler01 3 years ago
The beauty of science is that it corrects itself. It will admit that it is wrong.
tyrone9009 2 years ago 15
@tyrone9009 No it doesn't.
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
@RespectMyHate: Sure it does. There are many instances of major theories being scrapped or overhauled in light of experimental data which contradicted them. I can name dozens: phlogiston theory, luminiferous ether theory, classical mechanics, the structure of the atom, chemical bonding, Ptolemy's epicyclic theory, protein encoding theory, Steady State cosmology, galaxy-as-universe, Lamarkianism, ... the list goes on. Why do you say it does not?
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex What you kinda lost me there can you rephrase the question?
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RespectMyHate: Tyrone9009: The beauty of science is that it corrects itself...
You: No it doesn't.
Me: Yes it does, with examples. Why do you say it doesn't?
puncheex 1 year ago
@tyrone9009 Unless it involves admitting that there is a God.
jwpsycho2007 1 year ago
But this life form those meteors is from where? So there's alot of good reason to believe that the life (on our planet) is born on our planet. If we go on Europa, a Jupiter's moon, and that we dig in the ice, under the ice, there's a massive ocean, so in the center of the moon its quite hotter, maybe enought to permit life
bengacris 1 year ago
@bengacris: they think that there is seas on europa, they cant tell yet
random12660 1 year ago
this guy still has alot to learn!!!!
quicksilverAZ 3 years ago
lol what a comment, this guy does not even know what science is. Please ignore this non sense from AkaneByakuya.
CarlosyMonica 3 years ago
There isn't really a cold hard concrete awenser on how we got. Plus we can't really say on how life began because we were not there to witness it.
AkaneByakuya 3 years ago
@AkaneByakuya: Aw, I bet you say the same thing about all felonies - I wasn't there to see it, so it didn't happen.
puncheex 1 year ago