Italian debate show-WTC7

[charlesfloyb]

Another reason for lack of sound besides for the obvious ones I stated 2 posts down could be masking agents. Why wouldn't some sort of material or materials be used to soften the explosive sound if it was black operation? To repeat, according to Fire - Science 101, sound is NOT a prerequisite to test for explosives. Explosives should've been tested for, to put the issue at rest.

[charlesfloyb]

@ leftysergeant Actually steel structures if left to burn, burn out and leave the structural skeleton still standing. Every example that I've seen shows that the combustibles burn out and the fire moves on to another part of the building. The complete building NEVER collapses.

[charlesfloyb]

@leftysergeant Actually, according to the firman's protocol, there doesn't have to be sound in order to test for explosives or accelerants. No testing for explosives was ever done. Where the explosives were placed amongst all the other noise, quality of the recording devices, relationship of position of where recording device was with the explosion of WTC7, and other reasons could explain for lack of sound. Recorded sound is NOT mandatory.

[Finnquirer]

A colleague of mine expressed it exhaustively, referring to WTC 7:

"A building comes down like that. Of course it is a controlled demolition. How stupid can people be?" (my translation from Finnish)

See also on YouTube:

9/11 1WTC North Tower vs. Controlled Demolition

[TheEvilDetector]

There is no building 7, it was a giant toaster.

LOL j/k I was bored.

[leftysergeant]

Just another idiot saying that there were squibs at the top of WTC 7. Since when were squibs rectangular and since when do they stay in place relative to the buiolding as it falls and since when do they not expand horizonatlly? Those are gouges from the debris hitting the building. To think otherwise is moronic.

[prezmonk]

Dude, are you in the army? The asshole army?

[grozlz]

yes, those are not squibs, there was damage to the corner right there, where they 'appear'.

however, wtc 7 was otherwise surely a CD

[charlesfloyb]

@leftysergeant Obviously you know nothing about firefighting. If you did, you'd recognize this as controlled demolition.

[leftysergeant]

@charlesfloyb If you knew anything about CD, you would llbe saying "WTF? Where are the ear-splitting explosions that every recording device in Manhattan would have heard?"

Fire Science 101- Steel structures collapse if left to burn.

[haywood16]

Bush knew!

[RichardC111165]

The closest we have to an official story of WTC7 is the NIST report. Google WTC7 + NIST and look on page 26. Note that the east end and west end of the main roof collapsed within a HALF SECOND or each other.

[80smusicfanNO1]

That is a demolition! How could anyone think that that building would have collapsed due to debris hitting it!?

[leftysergeant]

@80smusicfanNO1 steel buildings frequently collapse due to fire.  The WTC buildings that collapsed were just the largest steel buiildings ever to catch fire after sustaining structural damage from impacts.

[edisonoside]

Italian Television is so cool. American Television would NEVER show this on. They would get in so much trouble if they did.

[vatolegato]

pkofpk, you seriously think that wasn't a CD? You expect me to believe the building's supports just magically disappeared as if the bones of a human body magically disappear to let it fall down in an almost even fashion?

[argyle684]

Dont worry man, some people just arent very smart.

[chrissarns]

Thank You! I've been looking for an implosion of a steel frame buildings to compare to wtc7. The web here has been scrubbed. Only unreinforced masonry buildings. I would like to add this to my wtc7 video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v­=A-c-6qkbxd0

[Chewbacca2000]

You can d/l it here;

http://www.911podcasts.com/dis­play.php?cat=9997&med=0&ord=Na­me&strt=30&vid=113&epi=0&typ=0

[PkofPk]

http://www.geocities.com/debun­king911

[bastp62]

so lets see here if set fire to a building your telling me its gonna come down like that, youve gotta be joking

[PkofPk]

No, you are.

 http://www.debunking911.com/fi­rsttime.htm

[grozlz]

PkofPk your sources suck...

[PkofPk]

"When the arugment is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates.

Your out of hand unsubstantiated dismissal "sucks". Betcha dollars to donuts you didn't even read past the first page at any of the sites.

911myths dot com